Good morning, everyone. Welcome to today's fourth quarter earnings presentation. As usual, I will start today's presentation with the highlights of the quarter before I'll go through the changes to the portfolio. Our CFO, Eirik Eide, will take us through the financials and the financing activity of the quarter. The presentation will be concluded with opening up for questions. If you would like to ask a question, please use the Q&A function. I'm starting off today's presentation on page two. 2025 has been an active year for Ocean Yield, and we are pleased to report a fourth quarter with, again, strong and stable performance. We report an EBITDA adjusted for finance lease effects of $95.3 million, and a net profit of $21.5 million. This brings the 2025 full year figures to $400.9 million and $90.8 million, respectively. We ended the fourth quarter with a strong balance sheet, with $138.8 million in available liquidity and an equity ratio of 30.7%. At year-end, the EBITDA backlog stood at $4.5 billion, and the average remaining contract duration was 10.6 years. During the quarter, we announced the extension of the LNG cooperation with NYK, with a four plus four vessel transaction, which Cheniere announced in December. I'll come back to this in greater detail. The infrastructure-like characteristics of LNG fits well with our strategy of investing in modern vessels with long-term stable cash flows to Tier One counterparties. This transaction highlights how we work with industry-leading partners to build and expand Ocean Yield into a leading provider of infrastructure assets to leading shipping and energy companies. The LNG new building program in France LNG and Cape Omega continue to progress according to plan and schedule, and two LNG vessels were delivered during the fourth quarter. Moving on to page three. Including the four LNG vessels on charter to Cheniere announced in December, the fleet now counts 70 vessels with an average age of 4.2 years. The EBITDA backlog was $4.5 billion at the end of the year, and 100% of the fleet remains on long-term charters. Our continued investments into the LNG space significantly increases diversification of the backlog, with LNG and gas carriers now making up 39% of the backlog. 50% of the backlog now comes from investment grade-rated companies. I think this is a strong testimony to our continued strategy of investing in long-term, stable cash flows to high-quality counterparties. Following the addition of Cheniere, we now have 18 first-class end users and charters who all enjoy leading positions in the different segments where they operate. This provides both sector and client diversification, and create a solid foundation for long-term, stable, and predictable cash flows in the years to come. Let me now flip to page four for more details on the LNG co-investments with NYK. On the 19th of December, we announced that Ocean Yield and NYK together have agreed to co-invest in four firm and four optional new-build LNG carriers to be constructed in Korea for deliveries in 2028 and 2029. Both parties will have an ownership interest of around 50% in the vessels, and NYK will technically and commercially manage the vessels. Upon delivery, the vessels will commence 12-year firm time charters with options to Cheniere. Cheniere is an investment grade-rated leading LNG player with more than 10% of the global liquefaction capacity and a current market cap of around $50 billion. We are now working closely with NYK to secure the financing and have obtained very attractive financing proposal from leading Asian and European banks. We are excited to expand our cooperation with NYK, and I think this transaction once again showcase our ability to grow with our partners. Let's now move to page five for more details on other changes to the portfolio. During the quarter, we welcomed Elisa Halcyon into the France LNG fleet, and she commenced her charter to EDF. During and after the quarter, Al Zour and Al Fattan were delivered to the Cape Omega fleet and commenced their charters to Qatargas. During the fourth quarter, purchase options have been declared for Nissos Rhenia and Nissos Despotiko, and they will be delivered to Okeanis Eco Tankers during the second quarter. During the quarter, six VLCCs on charter to International Seaways and two LR2 product tankers on charter to Scorpio were delivered to its new owners. After the quarter end, the LR2 STI Symphony was delivered to its new owner. I think with that, I'd like to hand the word over to Eirik, who will take us through the financials and the financing activity of the quarter. Thank you, Andreas. As usual, let me start with taking a look at a financial snapshot of the company as of the fourth quarter and also for the full year 2025. We have recorded EBITDA of $52.9 million, and adjusted EBITDA was $95.3 million. Net profit for the quarter, $21.5 million. The board of directors has not declared a dividend for this quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter, we had available liquidity of $138.8 million, and the equity ratio stood at 30.7%. Let us move on. If we look at the figures for the full year 2025, EBITDA was $227 million, with adjusted EBITDA of $400.9 million. Net profit for the year, $90.8 million. A total of $100 million was paid in dividends for the year. As you may recall, KKR did an equity injection of $30 million in Q3, so net of this, the dividend is $70 million. Let us move on to the headline figures of the income statement. Total revenues and other income was $60.5 million in Q4, compared with $71.3 million in Q3. More specifically, operating lease revenue was $19.4 million, compared to $18.7 million in Q3. The figure here is mainly in line with the third quarter for our vessels that are accounted for as operating leases. On finance lease revenue, that was $33.5 million, compared to $38.7 million in Q3. The decrease here is mainly due to redelivery of the six VLCCs that were on charter to International Seaways, where they declared the purchase options under those leases, and the vessels were redelivered in the fourth quarter. Income from our joint ventures was $5.9 million, compared to $6.8 million in Q3, and the variance here is mainly due to higher operating expenses in France LNG, and also costs related to delivery of one LNG vessels during the quarter. We had other revenue of $1.7 million, and this is mainly related to purchase options declared during the quarter. I may add here that the figure in Q3 was unusually high and was mainly one-off gains related to lease modification effects and transaction-related income from the completion of the Cape Omega LNG investment. That brings us to an operating profit of $47 million, compared to $59.5 million in Q3. On net financial items, those were negative $25.5 million, compared to negative $30.2 million in Q3. The decrease here is mainly driven by somewhat lower interest expenses as a result of vessel sales, also positive movements on the mark-to-market of derivatives. Overall, the quarter ended with a net profit of $21.5 million, compared to $28 million in Q3. As I mentioned, the reduction is mainly compared to last quarter due to the one-off effects that we recorded in Q3. If we move on and look at the historical adjusted EBITDA, this is the actual cash EBITDA that we receive under our lease agreements, also we have included interest on shareholder loans to the joint venture investments. This was $95.3 million in Q4, compared to $112.9 million in Q3. Also, at the next slide, if we look at the full year adjusted EBITDA figure, that was above the $400 million mark for the first time, compared to $375 million in Q3. Let's take a quick look at the balance sheet. If we turn to the balance sheet, you will see here we had total assets of $2.475 billion in Q4, which is down from $2.8 billion in Q3. The reduction here is mainly due to redelivery of the vessels that I mentioned and also, a dividend payment that was done in Q4. Available liquidity, almost $139 million, compared to $192 million last quarter. If we look at the book equity ratio, that was 30.7% compared to 30% in Q3. Let us move on to financing initiatives. Taking advantage of this, we have completed a refinancing of one Suezmax tanker in the quarter, where we reduced the margin on this loan. In addition, we have done the same on two container vessels, where the margins have been reduced and the tenors have been extended, further improving the returns on these investments. Finally, as part of our daily cash management, we have paid down on some of our revolving credit facilities also this quarter. At the end of the quarter, we had total available commitments of about $25 million under these credit facilities. That concludes my section, and I hand the word back to you, Andreas. Thank you, Eirik. Let me summarize the quarter quickly on page 11. 2025 was another strong year for Ocean Yield, as we continued to selectively grow and expand our business. These two value stands at very robust levels, and our counterparties remain well-capitalized, resulting in low overall portfolio risk. As Eirik mentioned, we continue to allocate capital to a strong and robust balance sheet, and our strong access to attractive repriced capital, both in the secured and unsecured markets, create a competitive advantage. We closely monitor the shipping markets and remain focused on risk reward as always, as we evaluate new growth and strategic partnerships with industry-leading partners and clients. I encourage all of you to read our newly published ESG report to better understand our continued ambition of playing a role as a facilitator for change in the maritime industry. I think with that, I'd like to thank you all for watching the Q4 earnings presentation, and I would now like to open up for questions. I remind you, if you do have a question, please use the Q&A function. We have received a couple of questions this morning, Andreas, and the first is: many of your transactions lately have been within the JV structures, deviating somewhat from ordinary bareboat structures. Is this a reflection of a change in strategy, and what would you expect going forward? Good question. Well, I think, yes, the most recent transactions on the LNG side are sort of different in structure, but effectively, they're very much in line with our strategy. I think in a nutshell, what we do is invest in modern assets with long-term charters. I think that the JV structures is a unique way for us to partner with industry-leading ship owners and operators, getting access to those kind of transactions, where the counterparties are effectively investment-grade rated entities. I think, going forward, to answer that question, it's also important to look backwards in terms of, you know, in 2021 and 2022, we did substantial transactions in, first, the tanker market and then the bulker market, where we saw best value at the time. I think over the last couple of years, we have seen, you know, attractive risk-reward on the LNG side. I think going forward, what you could expect is really to see us navigate between the different segments, pending on where we see the most attractive risk-reward. Yes, different in structure, but underlying really the same long-term, stable cash flows to credible credit or end users and clients. Yep. Good. We have talked about the second question here, is we have talked about Braskem before, and is there any update to the situation with Braskem, and how do you view that credit risk at the moment? We talked about this on the third quarter presentation as well. It is the fact that Braskem has hired advisors to do a balance sheet review. Effectively, this is a result of a prolonged downturn in the petrochemical industry. It's important to here note that shipping is an, I would say, mission-critical and fully integrated part of Braskem's operations, and as such, are classified as OpEx. We do not expect any balance sheet review to involve or have an impact on shipping as such. The LR1 product tankers that we currently have under construction at GSI in China currently have a lease to value at around 75%. These vessels are due to carry between 55,000 and 60,000 tons of naphtha per voyage, basically providing feedstock to Braskem's cracker facilities in Brazil. As such, you know, they are a necessary mean for Braskem to continue their production of polypropylene or plastics, effectively. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. On the LNG side, it's the same. They do provide feedstock, and as such, are mission-critical, and integrated into that production and operation as such. One could argue that the counterparty risk might be somewhat higher, but the asset protection and the nature of the vessels that we have financed with Braskem gives us necessary comfort as such. That said, we always monitor the situation very closely, and we will continue to stay on top of this situation also going forward. Good. Thank you. That seems to be all the questions that we have received this morning. Well, if there are no further questions, then, this concludes today's fourth quarter earnings presentation, and I would like to thank all of you for watching.