Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Zbigniew Siomkalski, and I will chair the Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. until the election of the chair of the Ordinary General Meeting of the KGHM. First of all, I would like to welcome the shareholders and their proxies representing shareholders of the company, members of the Supervisory Board, Mr. Józef Czyczerski, Mr. Przemysław Darowski, Mr. Artur Ulrich, Mr. Bogusław Szarek, as well as the Management Board, Remigiusz Paszkiewicz, President of the Management Board, Mr. Piotr Krzyżewski, Vice President of the Management Board for Finance, Mr. Zbigniew Bryja, Vice President of the Management Board for Development, Mr. Mirosław Laskowski, Vice President of the Management Board for Production, and Ms. Anna Sobieraj-Kozakiewicz, Vice President of the Management Board for International Assets. I would also like to welcome representatives of the media and the company employees. The minutes of this Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM will be taken by Mr. Radoslaw Senkiak, a notary sitting beside me. Now let me ask you to put forward candidates for the position of chair of this Ordinary General Meeting. Okay. Good morning. Andrzej Leganowicz. I'm a shareholder. I have one share, exercising my rights as well. I submit my candidacy for the position of chair of the Ordinary General Meeting. Thank you very much. Are there any other candidates? I don't see any. One candidate has been put forward, Mr. Andrzej Leganowicz, to be chair of the Ordinary General Meeting. Before the election of the chair of the Ordinary General Meeting, I would like to ask a representative of the programmer company to tell the shareholders and the proxies of shareholders about the details of the terminals used in the voting procedure. Good morning. You have received three tags. Green, yes, red, no, against, and yellow, abstention. If the voting starts, wait for the blue screen, please attach the tag to the reader. When you vote, you will see information that the vote has been cast. In the open vote, with the information what the vote was. In the secret ballot, no information. If you have more than two sets, you put one tag and then you put another tag. Let me suggest a test vote for you to check whether your tags work. If you see a please say yes or please vote, put the tags in the device to the reader. Voting in progress. The height of the arrow underneath. Have you checked? Have everybody checked whether the device works? We finish the test vote. The vote has been finished. Thank you very much. Are there any question to you? Are there any question? No. Thank you. I hereby start a secret ballot on the election of the chair of the Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM. The candidate is Mr. Andrzej Leganowicz. I can see that some people are still voting. I'm not closing the vote yet. Thank you very much. Has everybody cast their vote yet? I don't see anyone raising their hand. I hereby close the vote and please tell us the results. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, minutes of the secret ballot number one for the chair of the ordinary general meeting, 141,171,162 votes were cast. All votes were valid. For, 140,992,158, which constitute 99.8732% of the votes cast, against 179,003 votes, which is 0.12% of all valid votes cast, and there was one abstention. The number of shares, 141,171,162 shares and votes, and the percentage in the share capital, 70.58%. That's the percentage of such. In the secret ballot, Mr. Andrzej Leganowicz has been elected chair of this ordinary general meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. Hereby I give the floor to him, and he will chair this meeting from then on. Thank you very much. Thank you very much for electing me. By electing the chair of the ordinary general meeting, on the second point of the agenda, point three, confirmation of the legality of convening the ordinary general meeting and its capacity to adopt resolutions. First of all, I'm signing the attendance list. Let me inform you that the list signed by the chair of the ordinary general meeting will be submitted for you to view, for the shareholders to view, during this ordinary general meeting. Those of you who need to see the document will have an opportunity to do so until the end of this ordinary general meeting. Moving on to the confirmation of the legality and convening the ordinary general meeting, I would like to inform you that this ordinary general meeting have been convened in accordance with the current legal requirements. The announcement was published on the website of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. at www.kghm.com on the 5th of May, 2026, and this announcement is still on the website. The content of the announcement meets the requirements specified in the Code of Commercial Companies, Article 402 and 17/2, 2026. This is the number of the announcement. It was sent on the 5th of May, 2026 to the electronic information database in accordance with the legal provisions on the financial instruments and the regulations on public companies. In the report number 18/2026, the proposed resolutions have been published, resolutions submitted to this general meeting. The documentation submitted to the general meeting has been published on the website of the company. In line with the criteria specified in Article 402 of the Code of Commercial Companies, these documents are still on the website. I would like to inform you that no shareholder has exercised the right specified in 401 of the Code of Commercial Companies, that is submitting proposal for a point on the agenda. Two shareholders, Nationale-Nederlanden and the State Treasury, before the date of this general meeting, put forward candidates for the supervisory board in relation to the fact that there is a point on the agenda on the resolutions on the election of members of the supervisory board. Nationale-Nederlanden did that on the 1st of June, 2026, and the company published this in the report number 2026. The State Treasury informed everybody of that yesterday, and the company put information on this on the report number 21/2026. The list has been compiled in accordance with Article 407 and 406 of the Code of Commercial Companies. In line with Section 25.1 of the statutes of the company, the general meeting can adopt resolutions if at least one-quarter of the share capital is represented. Currently, the attendance is as follows. We have in this room, in person or represented by proxies, 843 shareholders. Number of shares, 141,171,163 shares. The percentage of the capital represented, 17.586%, rounded up to the 100%. I hereby announce that we have a quorum capable of holding this ordinary general meeting and adopting resolutions is there. We have a quorum. This general meeting was convened without possibilities of participating in it through electronic media. All the votes will be direct votes by people present in this room. In view of the above, I would like to say that this meeting has been convened legally. It is valid. It is capable of adopting the resolutions. We have representatives of the media. My request to them is to introduce them. Iwona Nieszka, Luczka Kazimierczak, Głogów, głogów website. Magda Źródek, a trading representative from KGHM. lubin24.com. Tomasz Jóźwiak from miedz.pl website. Thank you very much. Any shareholders or proxies have reservations about representatives of the media taking part in this general meeting? No reservations and protests. Let me inform you, ladies and gentlemen, that we have also representatives of certified accountants responsible for checking the reports, representing PricewaterhouseCoopers, which can be important in the reporting part of this ordinary general meeting. The meeting is streamed online on the internet, and the entire meeting is being recorded. As far as I know, it is recorded in the audio and video format. From the information I have, I can tell you that the recording will be published later on the website of the company. This is all as far as point three on the agenda. Point four, acceptance of the agenda of the ordinary general meeting. The agenda of the meeting is an obligatory part of the announcement of the general meeting. I assume that everybody present here knows the agenda. Is there a need for the agenda to be read out? I do not think there is such a need. We assume that all people present here know the agenda. Would you like to present some comments on the published agenda, or do you have any suggestions concerning the adoption of the agenda? If there are any such remarks, questions, please do so now. No contributions. There is a resolution. It is resolution number 2026 of the ordinary general meeting of KGHM, with its registered office in Lubin, dated ninth June 2026. On the acceptance of the agenda of the ordinary general meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. The ordinary general meeting of KGHM resolves the following. In section one, the following agenda of the ordinary general meeting of KGHM is hereby accepted, all the points are listed, and it is known to all of you. Some of the points have already been done. It contains 16 points. Point 16 is the closing of the ordinary general meeting. In section two of this resolution, we read that this resolution comes into force upon its adoption. Are there any comments on this proposal for a resolution? No. Let's have a vote. The vote is an open vote, and it will be settled by an ordinary majority. [Foreign language] The vote is in progress at the moment. Dziękuję. Thank you very much. I understand that we can say that all people authorized to vote have voted. Let's close the voting. Let's present the results on screens first. The number of votes cast for the adoption of the Resolution, 140,992,158. Against, 179,004. Abstentions, none. I hereby declare that the resolutions on the acceptance of the agenda of the Ordinary General Meeting has been adopted in an open ballot. Let's move to the reporting part of this Ordinary General Meeting, starting from point five on the agenda and ending on point 10. This means presentation as required, various reports submitted to the General Meeting by the Management of the company and the Supervisory Board. The procedure of the points would be as follows. First of all, I would like to suggest a reference to the publications by the company on the publications on the website of the company and ESPI, the Electronic Information Transfer System. All these reports mentioned in the agenda from point five to point 10, have been published well in advance. I assume that all interested parties have had access to them. This presentation of the documents, I think, has been completed. In addition, what we can read from point five to point 10, let me also inform you that the General Meeting will be debating the report on good practices in sponsoring in sport by State Treasury companies in 2025. This report was added to the documentation presented by the company and was published together with other documents before the General Meeting on the website of the company. As an introduction to the discussion, we will have a brief presentation by the management board with key points of the reports. I suggest that we open a discussion, and this discussion will cover points from five until point 10. It will cover all the reports and all the proposals mentioned in this point. Shareholders wishing to contribute to the discussion will have an opportunity to do so. Is this formula of proceedings clear to all present? I think yes. Let me invite the management board of the company to present reports submitted to the general meeting, and reports and proposals. Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. As Mr. Chair said already, the financial performance and results have already been published before. I'm talking not only about the entire 2025, but also I'm talking about detailed publication of Q1 performance 2026. I would not like to dwell on the details and particular results. I would just like to present several general comments on the actions of the company and management board in 2025, and then I will give the floor to Mr. Krzyżewski so that he can comment on the most important items pertaining to our financial performance and the operational activity of the company. Ladies and gentlemen, as the management board, we believe that 2025, last year, the company had very good results, and I'm not talking only about the financial results, but also operational activities. This is a year of responsible decisions and very sustainable implementation of our decisions. When looking at the stability of our operations based on extended assets, the management board decided to build three new shafts here in the Copper Basin area. These are fundamental decisions in terms of our investments, they will secure the continuity of production. They will also provide the security of mining and metallurgy for years to come, tens of years to come. At the same time, the management board increased the effectiveness of the organization, we made very good decisions. We, as a result, increased our investment capacity. Furthermore, we saw improvement in our processes, in the main technological process of KGHM. We made a decision, we started implementing a cost optimization process, I'm talking about the cost optimization process that brings us very positive effects. We focus on those areas that have the greatest potential with regard, of course, optimization, materials, energy production, and inventories. It is very important in our operations. These are particular actions, I have said they bring tangible results. At the same time, I believe that we have a very good cooperation with the social party. We have a stable social dialogue within the entire group, this has been proven by having a remuneration consensus that was reached at the beginning of this year. Also this is based on our performance, on our results from 2025, to a large extent. We want to be good partners to the social party. Thanks to the involvement of the management board in 2025, I would like to underline that, we have now a changed tax environment. This allowed us to release a large pool of assets for investments. I would like to underline that this is money that comes from lowered taxes. Part of these assets are already invested in our country. I would also like to say that our international assets are important, so mines and our previous investments abroad. I am talking about Chile and the U.S.A. We very efficiently continued the construction of the Victoria mine in Canada. You know the result, it is almost half of the EBITDA from the international assets that we have. These assets are really significant, and they are a great stabilizer, so to say, of our financial performance. It gives us a lot of room for improvement, investment, and stabilizing our operational activity. Also, we talked about that before, we do have certain plans regarding expansion abroad, and we are going to talk about that when presenting our strategy. In 2025, we provide a strategy that required certain corrections, adjustments, already with the new composition of the management board. This pertaining to our activity abroad, strengthening our energy side. The third pillar area was the capital group. I am not talking only about the companies here in Poland, but also our international assets. We are going to present this strategy at the beginning of July. This is our corporate calendar, and this is, of course, connected with the date of presenting the results for particular months. Ladies and gentlemen, since we do have these good results and we do have our long-term dividend policy in place, we decided to pay dividend in the amount PLN 1.50 per share. This is, I am talking to our shareholders that are here in the room and the proxies, this is going to be discussed today as well. Now I would like to give the floor to Mr. Krzyżewski. Thank you very much. Mr. Krzyżewski, thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Now, I would like to remind you about our performance in 2025. I will give you two dimensions year-on-year, then I will refer to the budget of 2025. As far as the consolidated revenue goes, we have an increase of 3%. This is over PLN 36 billion. Cost discipline and certain operational leverage resulted in an increase of 22% of EBITDA. This exceeded PLN 10 billion on a consolidated level. Our profit was 28% or 20% higher. This is over PLN 3,680,000,000. Now, let's move on to the budget dimension. When you look at the production in Poland and abroad, the production of payable copper was according to the budget. Molybdenum and silver, the parameters exceeded our budget assumptions. When we look at the sales, comparing this to 2025, payable copper, this was according to our budget. Sales of silver exceeded the budget and precious metals as well, which allowed us to reach the results that were assumed in the budget. Thank you so much. Thank you very much. In accordance with my previous announcement, I will open a discussion in a minute, and this will be our main discussion of this general meeting, and it will include points five to 10 of the agenda. The first question that I would like to know whether there are any participants who would like to express their views or comments now. If you would. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Marek Barylak. Now a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, if you have prepared your questions, I would like to ask you to convey your questions or comments to the chair of the general meeting. In a moment, I will ask you to formulate your questions that were prepared for today's general meeting. I would propose a short technical break so that the management board or the supervisory board can present their answers. Now let me give the floor to Mr. Adam Siwek. Good afternoon. I'm a shareholder. My name is Adam Siwek, and I'm the president of the Thermal Energy Company and a foundation for Magnolia. I have questions, but they will be preceded by a quote. A letter from the president to the shareholders. Let me quote this letter. KGHM, for years, have been operating in light of sustainable development, combining production needs to responsible approach to the environment and relations with local communities. One of the pillars of KGHM Polska Miedź is involvement in dialogue and good neighborly relations. Energy transformation and diversification of energy sources remained a very important direction of acting of the company. The highest operational standards, transparency and dialogue build value. I would like to thank all the shareholders of KGHM Group that take active part in the dialogue and support us in development sincerely. Ladies and gentlemen, in light of the information presented in the financial statement, including the emissions, there's a question arising. Is this transparency model declared in the statement, the model of environmental responsibility, dialogue, and relations is reflected in the actual activities of the group? These questions I would like to ask to the supervisory board, and especially that they are supervising the everyday activities of the company. Three questions. Does the supervisory board confirms that they received a letter on the 17th of October 2025 regarding the inspection of the responsibility to inform shareholders about the activities? Is the lack of the response mean that the supervisory board thinks that the risk is not important? Has the supervisory board analyzed the decisions of the court that state that the organs of the KGHM do not provide public information, with the threat of breaking or infringing on the relevant legislation? The questions that you are asking pertain to the questions regarding the closure of the year 2025. Okay. Yes, that is true. I do have more than 10 questions to the management board. Can the management board confirm that the financial statements for 2025 clearly, fully reflect all the important risks, regulatory risk, environmental risk, and operational risk of the group for 2025? What reserves do you have for potential environmental fines, regulatory fines and risks related to the energy and thermal energy activities of the group? Does the board think that the risk included in the letter from the 17th of October were not fully revealed in the financial statements for 2025? Does the management board think that the damage regarded to the mining activity is not present? Can the management board explain why Zagłębie Lubin paid fines to the managers of the road infrastructure, water infrastructure, but in terms of the thermal energy, they say that there are no losses. How does the management board define the causal relation regarding the mining activities that might be deemed dissipated? Does the management think that the books in Legnica risk is included in the financial statement? Do you think that this risk is important in terms of a financial statement, and how is this reflected in the financial statement? When will the management board present the current energy strategy of the KGHM Capital Group? Does the lack of this strategy impact the investment decisions and risk management? What were the reasons for refusal of participation in Strategy Energy Collaboration Poland and the study visit from Denmark, an attaché in the Embassy of Denmark, even though the Marshal of the Lower Silesia Minister of Energy and the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Denmark have the patronage over this project. Has the management board analyzed this cooperation, and what are the results of this assessment? Why did you refuse the dialogue in this respect with stakeholders? Does the management board confirm that the installation at Dobrzyńska Street in Legnica was exploited according to the permit and the provisions of the directive? In 2025, emission indexes, have they been exceeded, and if so, for how long? Have you reported that to relevant bodies? Have you analyzed the risk of fines related to the operation of the installation, Dobrzyńska Street? Installation, Niklowa Street, was it operating in 2025, and did it produce energy? Did the management board analyze the risk of these operations without the proper concession? The last question, can the management board confirm that all the risks, including mining damage and regulatory risk and environmental risk, were reliably and fully revealed according to MSSF as well? Have they been revealed to the shareholders? This is the only opportunity for me to ask these questions, and my questions are very detailed. All the letters that we sent were not addressed. We did not receive any responses. We did not receive satisfactory answers. Thank you very much for this possibility of asking these questions. These questions, do you Okay, I do not have these questions in writing, but there are not many of them, and maybe somebody could actually write a note to the relevant bodies in KGHM. Yes, we can do that. Question number one, it pertains to the financial statement, the separate financial statement. I'm talking about page 26, 27. I'm talking about the loss of the value of the assets. I'm going to wait till the President opens this statement. Generally, in this part of the financial statement, the company said that nothing shows that the test of value loss should be performed or a test of reversing the value loss of the national assets. However, compared to the situations from two years ago, when this was taking into account, the macroeconomic assumptions and the situation in the company were different. I'm talking about company capitalization, prices of metals, et cetera. you said that you are implementing a number of cost optimization activities. We do have a change as a tax, I would like to quote one sentence from the statement. There's this sentence there. Following the change of the regulation on changing the tax on mining materials, there is no reason to change. There's going to be no impact on the value of the national assets. This is what the board said. there were public documents, like the justification to the act, signed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk. There's information about benefits that KGHM enjoys after introducing or implementing this act. It's PLN 10 billion within 10 years, for the first three years, this is about PLN 2 billion. Looking at the quarterly results, I would like to say that these benefits are larger than expected. Even this is visible in the Q1. my question is, do you still claim the results for 2025 would be higher by PLN 3 billion. You quoted one of the financial statements presented to the general meeting, I do believe that your statements have been well thought through. today we are not changing the wording of the statement. according to the Act on auditors, until the statement is not approved, it can be changed. Theoretically, yes. is this your intention? No. Would you like to change the financial statement or one of the financial statements presenting to the general meeting? this is what I understand. you asked whether the management board maintains its position, the position of the management board is included and reflected in the financial statement, right? Okay, this is a statement from March. It was presented in June. I quoted a governmental document from October. Yes, of course, there are numerous factors that are important to you. I would like to know whether the management board took into account this governmental document, concluding that the change in the tax is not a reason for value loss. I understand this is your first question. This question has been written down. can you move on to the next question, symmetrical or analogous question to the supervisory board? Is Mr. Matysiak here? He's our main auditor. Mr. Matysiak. He's here? Okay. I would like to know whether you are a certified auditor and what role did you play in the statement. I'm a managing partner of the entire process, and I represent the company. Are you the main certified auditor? I am a certified auditor, responsible for the financial statement. what's your question? Value loss. You said that this is one of the main issues of this examination. this is a quote from the separate financial statement. the analysis included the understanding of the process of value loss, reasons why there's no value loss. can you tell me, during your analysis, did you also analyze this document that I mentioned? This is a public document. This is a justification of the government for the bill regarding the tax on certain mine assets, it was signed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk. this document says that the benefits for KGHM in the first 3 years is about PLN 2 billion, in the next years to come, it's PLN 1 billion per year. Have you analyzed that, what other procedures did you perform in this particular scope? I would like to focus on this value loss of the national assets. Okay, that's your next question. Thank you. We have written that down. The next question, please. Okay, that's the question for our certified auditor. Now the next question. Do we have any other questions? Okay, question number three to the management board. In 2023, the company had a marginal exposure to any securing instruments, no open positions for copper and silver. At the end of 2025, the scale of these measures increased to 27 million ounces of silver, over 200,000 in terms of copper, the exposure increased by 5 million ounces of silver. In the statement for 2025, we have a negative value of these instruments in total profit, PLN 2.3 billion, this is the highest negative result in the history of KGHM. I'm talking about nominal values. My question to the management board is, the decision of risk management changes, has it been supported by any analysis of risks before, including the profit and loss analysis long-term? Have you also analyzed the results of internal reports, audits pertaining to the process of hedging the metal prices? Thank you. Next question. The question has been written down. Next question, please. This is a question to the management board. It pertains to the supervision of a particular company, a foreign company. It's a very specific characteristic question, maybe. What I'm talking about is the control scope over DMC Mining Services. In public materials that are currently available, in the emission prospect of the Luminex Resources company, DMC Mining Services is indicated as a source of information pertaining to the plant investments for investments near Nowa Sól. Okay, I would like to ask the following. Is the management board aware that this information is available in the market, that the information from the subsidiary of KGHM has been used? Has this information been verified within the ownership supervision over this company? I'm talking about a potential risk for the future regarding the reputation. That's what I wanted to ask. That's all. These are all your questions, right? Okay. Now. The resolution on the appropriation of profits. If you like to address the proposal for the resolution, I will give you this opportunity when we vote on the profits. That would be point 11.d, if it's only the proposals for the resolution. If you want to formulate something more, if you are talking only about a proposed resolution, please submit it at the point when we will have the voting. Thank you very much. I agree that I will present a proposal for the relevant resolution in point 11. To sum up, I would like to suggest that we have a 20-minute break in order for the company representatives to be able to present their position on answering the questions asked to them. Let me say that the questions to the supervisory board, given the fact that it is a collegiate body, the supervisory board specifies its position on a given matter collegially. I think that the company will refer to these questions, no doubt, but these questions can be answered in a limited manner during this general meeting, given the fact that the nature of the board is collegial. The supervisory board is collegial. That's all. I think that a break of 20 minutes will be enough. Let's have a 20-minute break. It's 12:25 P.M., please come back at 12:45 P.M. A request for you to take your seats to continue our ordinary general meeting. I request for you to inform the people still in the lobby to return to the room because we will soon resume the general meeting. I hereby resume the ordinary general meeting of KGHM. We are in the reporting part of this general meeting. In the course of the discussion covering points from five until point 10 of the agenda, the shareholders have formulated some questions. After the resumption of the meeting, there is a request to the management board to present its position on the questions asked by the shareholders. Ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of the management board, I would like to confirm that all the questions submitted today at this ordinary general meeting, all the reports have been prepared in accordance with all the rules and regulations and prepared meticulously. When it comes to answers to these questions addressed to the management board, we will respond as required by law within 14 days in writing, because first of all, we have to check, and that's one of the main reasons. We have to check whether the detailed answers to these questions do not infringe, A, confidentiality, B, require us to go back to the source documents in order to prepare a good answer, in order for these answers to be reliable, honest, and as detailed as possible given the objective situation, given the requirements of confidentiality and secrecy. Thank you very much. When it comes to the questions addressed to the supervisory board. Ladies and gentlemen, when it comes to the questions addressed to the supervisory board, one concerns November 2025. We will check that. I was not member of the supervisory board then, but we will really check whether the board was informed and what decisions it took on the matter. The other issue concerns March this year. We are dealing with year 2025. The board has asked the management board for explanations. We have not yet received all of them, because I know that talking to the president, some decisions have already been taken, we are yet to receive. When it comes to the rulings, the rulings come from two weeks ago. The company received them last week, and the supervisory board will certainly explore that, but that concerns 2026. Thank you very much. In view of the above, we have to decide that the discussion on the reporting part Yes. I'm sorry. I do apologize. Please let the auditor present his position. I hereby confirm our position expressed in the opinion from the 26th of March. We have read the relevant documents, confirming now that there are no grounds for tests for loss of value. Thank you very much. I understand that. No. In accordance with the rules and regulations, we have times for questions and replies. I can reply to what I've heard. Yes. One of my questions on the position of the management board on the loss of value issue concerned the here and now. In two weeks, I understand we will vote on the financial statement, if you decided now that, for example, having analyzed this government document, that you conclude, "We were wrong. We've made a mistake. Perhaps indeed, this change in the tax does give us some additional earnings, and our assumptions from March were wrong." I understand that you have been talking about encouraging the management board on changing its position. No. The management said that it would reply within 14 days. I think we should receive the answer here and now. Please let me tell you that this term, this deadline within two weeks, it has been provided for in the Code of Commercial Companies. We are complying with the legal regulations and in the situation in which you are formulating your questions, important for you, this requires preparation for answers based on analysis of the relevant documents. The admissible form of reply is a reply in writing within two weeks under Article 428 of the Code of Commercial Companies. It's a usual procedure followed during a general meeting. A reply is provided in the form of a report and addressed to everybody. Thank you very much. Mr. Chair, if I may. Yes. I'm aware of the procedure of the deadlines, I do like to draw your attention to one issue. The management board was informed many times about the risks I mentioned, and it has failed to reply. That's one thing. The rulings that were delivered a few days ago, they do concern 2025. I would like to stress that. That's the second part. The third part, perhaps a verification of risks that may materialize and may influence the financial statement leading to its correction. If I may, I would like to ask the management board, when it comes to specific questions that were read out, the management board was aware of these risks. That's all I wanted to say. I do understand. I do confirm what I've said later. There is a procedure for providing information, for transparent information relating to the ordinary meeting, providing answers in the course of a general meeting, and it cannot be questioned, that procedure. When it comes to your position on the impact of specific circumstances on the content of the financial statement, let me inform you that irrespective of how important it seems to you, what you are talking about, we may be dealing with what can be described as divergence of positions. Not necessarily, we don't have to agree with you. I think that every single person formulating any question or thesis during this general meeting today is aware of the fact that the perception of company issues and the impact of various circumstances on the company operations, in the opinion of the management board, may be different from what it seems from the perspective of a shareholder coming to the general meeting and having a different view on the matter. We do understand this situation. The position of the management board may be different from your position. It can be so, but it doesn't have to be so. This position has been divergent, different for many months, which doesn't change the situation. You have asked your question. The management board has declared its willingness to reply, I assume that the management board will reply within two weeks, the statutory deadline. We are hereby closing the discussion on the reporting part of this meeting. The statement referred from points five to 10, they have been submitted to the general meeting. As has been said before, we have referred to earlier publications of the company. Also, they have been read by the general meeting. Next point of the agenda is number 11. In point A, we have approval of the separate financial statement of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for the financial year ended on the 31st of December 2025. That's point A. The proposed resolution submitted to the general meeting on this matter has been published among the materials for this general meeting. The question, do we need to read out the whole proposal of the resolution before we vote on it? I see no comments on that. One more question on a formal issue. Perhaps we could vote on a break in the meeting until the moment we receive the answers, then we can continue when the management board has prepared the answers. We have the 9th of June. We have time until the end of the month. Quite a lot of time. Honestly speaking, I don't know whether we can submit such a formal proposal to have a break. Please come down. Does your contribution formulated now, should it be treated as a formal proposal for a break in this general meeting until the 30th of June 2026, until the Management Board has prepared. What we can do, we can announce a break, which in line with the regulations of the Code, will not be longer than 30 days, indicated a date and place where the general meeting will be resumed. If the Management Board has prepared the answers in two weeks, we can meet in two weeks. Let me draw your attention to the fact that a resolution on a break in the general meeting cannot be conditional. We cannot say "if" in the resolution. The question is, we heard that we will have answers in two weeks. I have a question to you then. Are you submitting a formal proposal for a break in the general meeting until a specific date or no? Yes. I think three weeks will be enough. Until, yes, until the 30th of June. I formally submit the proposal for a break in this general meeting in order to resume it on the 30th of June. Such a proposal is submitted under Article 408 of the Code of Commercial Companies on the break in the general meeting on a date different from the. Such a proposal requires a qualified majority of 2/3. Is the situation clear? Can I have your name? Jerzy Paluchnik. Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby start a vote on can we have a five-minute break. Do you need time to consult? 5 minutes? Yes. I announce a five-minute technical break, following which we will vote on the proposal by Mr. Jerzy Paluchnik to announce a break in the general meeting until the 30th of June 2026 and resume the general meeting at the place, at the venue when it was convened. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, have you managed to receive the required information for you to be able to vote? Do we have everybody in the room? We hereby starting the vote on the proposal for announcing a break in the general meeting until the 30th of June, 2026. The hour of the resumption can be the same, 11:00 A.M. I assume that the venue will be available on this potential date of the resumption of the general meeting. I hereby announce the vote on the proposed resolution on announcing a break in the ordinary general meeting of the KGHM Polska Miedź S.A., acting under Article 408 of the Code of Commercial Companies, announces a break in the general meeting until the 30th of June, 2026, until 11:00 A.M. The meeting will be resumed at the venue of the Jan Wyżykowski Hall, at the venue where the general meeting has been convened, and the relevant address of the company as is in the announcement of the convening of the meeting. This resolution enters into force upon its adoption. If this resolution is adopted, the meeting will suspend all the procedures until the day of the resumption of the meeting. I hereby start the vote. Please vote. Those of you who are for the break, use the plus tag. Those who are against the break, use the minus tag. Please note that given the qualified majority required for this vote, all votes, including abstentions are taken into account in this vote. [Foreign language] The voting is in progress. [Foreign language] No, not yet. Voting is still in progress. [Foreign language] I hereby close the voting. Please present the results. The number of votes for is six. Votes against, 70,982,668. Abstentions, 68,263,134 votes. I hereby declare that the number of votes for this resolution is not enough to adopt a resolution on a break in the general meeting. Let us return to the agenda. We have a vote on the approval of the separate financial statements of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for the financial year ending on the 31st December 2025. Let me stress here that the management board has confirmed the validity of this statement, and so have the auditors. Let us vote on this proposal of resolution, and it will be an open ballot. The proposal has been included in the material prepared for the general meeting. There is no need to read out the whole draft resolution. Cast your votes on the resolution on the approval of the separate financial statements of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for the financial year ended on the 31st of December 2025. [Foreign language] The vote is still in progress. I would like to ask the technical staff to intervene. Can we say No. Still waiting. I hereby close the voting. Please present the results. The number of votes cast for the adoption of the resolution, 139,992,096. Against, 636,145. Abstentions, 542,921 votes. I hereby declare that the resolution has been adopted by the general meeting. Next, sub point B, adoption of the resolution on the approval of the consolidated financial statements of the KGHM Group for the financial year ended on the 31st of December 2025. The proposal of the resolution is included in the materials for this general meeting. I hereby submit this for the vote of the general meeting. Please cast your votes. Voting is in progress. I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. The number of votes for the adoption of the resolution, 139,992,097. Against, 636,144. Abstentions, 542,921. The resolution has been adopted by the general meeting. Point three, adoption of the resolution on the approval of the Management Board's report on the activities of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. The proposal of the resolution has been included in the materials for the general meeting. I hereby submit it to the general meeting to vote on it. Approval of the Management Board's report on the activities of the KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. and the KGHM Polska Miedź Group. Please cast your votes now. I hereby close the vote, please present the results. The number of votes for, 140,438,831. Against, 189,410. Abstentions, 542,921 votes. The resolution has been adopted by the general meeting in an open ballot. The adoption of the resolution on the appropriation of profit for 2025. I would like to present the proposal for the resolution. We can read. The Ordinary General Meeting of the KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. hereby resolves that the profit for 2025 of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. in the amount of PLN 1,946,423,407.72 shall be appropriated as follows. 1, as shareholder dividend, PLN 300 million, which represents PLN 1.5 per one share. Reserve capital, PLN 1,646,423,407. Section two, the Ordinary General Meeting hereby sets the following. A dividend date for 2025 at 25th June 2026. two, payment date for dividend for 2025 as at 9 July 2026 in the amount of PLN 1.5 per share. three, the resolution comes into force upon its adoption. The proposal is accompanied by a justification. Mr. Barylak has prepared an alternative proposal for the resolution. I ask him to present it now. Mr. Chair, ladies and gentlemen, operating as a shareholder, I would like to propose for a resolution on the appropriation of profit of KGHM Group for 2025. The Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. on the 9th of June 2026 resolved the following. one, the Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź resolved to divide net profit for 2025 in the amount of PLN 1,936,423,407.72 in the following manner. one, for shareholder dividend, PLN 600 million, so PLN 3 per one share. two, for reserve capital, PLN 1,346,432,407.72. Two, the ordinary general meeting of KGHM resolved, sets a dividend date at 25 June 2025, a payment date of dividend for 2025 as at 9th July 2026, and the amount is PLN 1.5. The resolution comes into force upon its adoption. Justification for this proposal of resolution. The dividend is a link between the company and shareholders and is a form of reward for the capital and contribution to the success of the company. Increased amount of dividend in comparison to the recommendation of the management board will not have a measurable impact on the investment program of the company and will not cause an imbalance between the dividend and the capacity of the company to invest effectively, and is in line of Article 339 of the Code of Commercial Companies. In 2024, let me note, the ordinary general meeting decided to pay dividend for 2023 in the amount of PLN 1.50 per share, despite the fact that the financial statement of the KGHM for the financial year ending on the 31st of December 2023, showed a net loss of PLN 1,150,000,000. The payment of the dividend made no impact on the operations of the company, especially given the economic aspect. Significantly, from December 2025, the situation of the market has been very good when it comes to the main materials extracted by the company. Both the national and international analysts say that the prices of these materials will continue given the demand on international markets. As a result, in the first quarter of 2025, the company has achieved a net profit of PLN 3,359,000,000, which is a rise of over 10% in comparison with the previous year. In view of the above, given the need to maintain the relationship between the company and the shareholders and the interest of the company, the proposal is justified and necessary. Thank you very much. Can I have this proposal in writing? Two copies. Thank you very much. Two copies. Thank you very much. Does anyone present here would like to say something about the appropriation of profit for 2025? I don't see any hands and requests for the floor. I think that we should have a 10-minute break in order for proxies to consult the principles, how to vote, and then secondly, the financial implications of the proposal needs to be checked and verified with regard to the fact whether all the amounts will balance each other out. I think we'll be ready to resume the proceedings in 10 minutes. Let's meet here at 1:42 P.M. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, please take your seats. We are going to resume the general meeting shortly. If you could please tell all the persons that are still outside the room to come back so that we can resume the proceedings. Thank you. I hereby resume the proceedings of the general meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. This is point 11D of the agenda, and in this point, we are going to adopt a resolution on the appropriation of profit of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. Marek Bareła, shareholder, has a draft resolution with alternative wording of this resolution. We are going to vote on this draft in the first place. Here are the assumptions. The amount from the profit for a dividend is PLN 600 million, which is PLN 3 per share, and the company's reserve capital, PLN 1,346,432,434.72. Paragraph two, dividend date is the 25th of June 2026, and the payment date of dividend is the 9th of July 2026, PLN 3 per share. This is the wording of the resolution read in full by Mr. Barylak before that. Let's have a voting on the resolution regarding appropriation of profit, as presented by Mr. Barylak. This is an open voting. Please cast your votes now. If the draft resolution proposed by Mr. Barylak receives a simple majority of votes, the general meeting will approve the resolution that is aligned with the intention of Mr. Barylak, we do not vote on the proposition of the management board. If the simple majority is not achieved, we are going to vote on the proposal presented by the management board. Thank you very much. Has everyone cast their votes? I'm closing the voting now. Please present the results of the voting. Votes for the adoption of the resolution, 29,266,226 votes. Against, 63,599,902 votes. Abstention, 46,399,680 votes. I hereby state that the resolution did not achieve the required majority and is not being approved by the general meeting. Now we are going to vote on the resolution proposed by the management board. Let me remind you of the values, PLN 300 million. For dividend, PLN 1.5 per share. For the company's reserve capital, PLN 423,407.72. The dividend date at 25th of June 2026, and the payment date of the dividend, 9th of July 2026. The amount of PLN 1.5. Now let's vote. I'm closing voting now. The number of votes for adopting the resolution, 140,992,152. Against, 179,009, and abstentions, one. I hereby state that the resolution is adopted by the general meeting. The next point on the agenda is the approval of the report of the Supervisory Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. The wording of the resolution, the Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. approves the report of the Supervisory Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. Paragraph two, the resolution comes into force upon its adoption. Now let's vote on this resolution. Please cast your votes. I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results, please. Number of votes for, 140,449,231 votes. Against, 179,009. Abstentions, 542,921. I hereby state that the resolution has been approved. Now let's move on to point 11F, regarding issuing an opinion on the report on the remuneration of the Management Board and Supervisory Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. The wording is as follows: the Ordinary General Meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. gives a favorable opinion on the report on the remuneration of the Management Board and Supervisory Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. Now let's vote on the resolution. Please cast your votes. Can I close the voting? Yes. Okay, I hereby close the voting. Let's see the results. Number of votes for adopting the Resolution, 84,133,663 votes. Against, 45,951,266. Abstentions, 10,935,189. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted by the general meeting. The next point in the agenda, point number 12, these are approvals of the best performance of duties of members of the Management Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. As an introduction, let me add that all the resolutions pertaining to the performance of duties for the members of the Management Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. are going to be secret ballots because these are confidential matters. The second piece of information is that there are certain limitations to the voting rights that stem from Article 411 of the Code of Commercial Companies. So the proxies cannot vote on the performance of duties for the members of the Management Boards. If such a situation takes place, I'm going to ask the technical crew to exclude such a person from voting. Now, in the next votings, I'm only going to provide you with the name and surname of the person that is subject to the voting. I'm not going to read the entire wording of the resolution. The first resolution pertains to Mr. Zbigniew Bryja. We do not want to decline the name. I'm talking about linguistic declination, so Zbigniew Bryja. Now we are going to vote on the resolution regarding the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Zbigniew Bryja, a member of the Management Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. So now please cast your votes. This is a secret ballot. Can I deem the voting closed? Yes, I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results. The number of votes for adopting the resolution, 140,286,934. Against, 251,522. Abstentions, 632,706. So the resolution has been approved in the secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Piotr Krzyżewski. Let's vote in a secret ballot. Please cast your votes. [Foreign language] I hereby close the voting. The number of votes for: 140,286,933. Against: 251,523. Abstentions: 632,706. I hereby state that the resolution in a secret ballot has been adopted. The next resolution: approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Mirosław Laskowski. It's a secret ballot. Please cast your votes. [Foreign language] The voting is on. Zamykam głos- I'm closing the voting. The number of votes for: 140,286,934 votes. Against: 251,521. Abstentions: 632,706 votes. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Igor Złotalisz. Let's have a secret ballot on the resolution. In this case, please cast your votes. The voting is in progress. I'm closing the voting. The number of votes for, 140,070,394. Votes against, 468,061. Abstentions, 632,706. The resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. Now, resolution on the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Piotr Stryczek. Let's have a secret ballot. Please cast your votes. The voting is in progress. I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results. The number of votes for adopting the resolution, 138,263,268. Against, 468,060. Abstentions, 632,706 votes. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot by the general meeting. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Anna Sobieraj-Kozakiewicz. Let's have a secret ballot on the case. Please cast your votes. I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results. The number of votes for adopting the resolution, 140,068,423. Votes against, 470,032. Abstentions, 632,606 votes. I hereby state that the resolution was adopted in the secret ballot. The next voting pertaining to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Andrzej Szydło. Let's vote on the resolution for the approval of the performance of duty for Andrzej Szydło. The voting is secret. Please cast your votes. The voting is in progress. I'm closing the voting. Please, let's see the results. The number of votes for adopting the Resolution 140,068,422. Votes against, 470,032. Abstentions, 632,606. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. These are the results of the voting on the approval of the performance of duties of members of the Management Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. As I understand, all the persons from the Management Board have been included in the votes. Now we are going to move on to the adoption of resolutions on the approval of the performance of duties of members of the Supervisory Board of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for 2025. These are going to be secret ballot and Article 411, as I've mentioned before. First, we are going to vote on Aleksander Cieslinski. Let's vote. This is a secret ballot. Please cast your votes. The voting is in progress. I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results. The number of votes for, 131,361,612. Votes against, 9,071,202. Abstentions, 738,342. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Jozef Tepecki. Let's vote on the resolution. The vote is secret. Please cast your votes. The voting is in progress. I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results. The number of votes for adopting the Resolution, 131,580,034. Votes against, 8,852,780. Abstentions, 738,342. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Przemysław Darowski. Let's have a secret ballot on this case, please cast your votes now. I'm closing the voting. Let's see the results. The number of votes for, 133,088,000. We've lost the results. Can we see them again, please? Please, technical crew, we could not see the results. Again, for 133,088,187. Against, 384,254. Abstentions, 738,342. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Zbysław Dobrowolski. We're going to have a secret ballot on this case. Please cast your votes now. I'm closing the voting, let's see the results. The number of votes for, 131,578,150 against 8,854,669, and abstentions 712,209. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. I have received information from the technical crew. It turns out that the attendance changed, that the number of shareholders present is 842. The quorum is still maintained, the general meeting still can adopt resolutions. One person left the room. The next resolution that is going to be voted on is the resolution on the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Dominik Januszewski. We're going to have a secret ballot on this case. Please cast your votes now. I hereby close the vote. Let's see the results. The number of votes for 139,806,551 against 626,268. Abstentions 712,209. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the approval of the performance of duties for 2025 of Tadeusz Kocowski. We're going to have a secret ballot on that. Please cast your votes now. [Foreign language] I hereby carry the vote. Let's see the results. The number of votes for is 123,397,474. Votes against 17,035,340 and abstentions 712,214. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. Next resolution is on the approval of the performance of duties of Mr. Marian Noga. I hereby begin the vote. Please cast your votes. [Foreign language] I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. The number of votes in total 141,145,929. Against 10,071,617. Abstentions 712,209. The resolution has been adopted. The next resolution concerns the approval of the performance of duties of Mr. Piotr Prugar. It will be voted on in a secret ballot. Please cast your votes. [Foreign language] I hereby close the vote and please present the results. In total, the number of votes for the adoption of the resolution, 139,946,360. Against, 486,503. Abstentions, 712,209. The resolution has been adopted. The next resolution concerns the approval of performance of duties of Mr. Bogusław Szarek. Please cast your votes. [Foreign language] I hereby close the vote and please present the results. The number for the adoption of the resolution, 127,619,719. Against, 12,813,100. Abstentions, 712,209. The resolution has been adopted by the General Meeting in a secret ballot. The next vote is on the approval of the performance of duties of Ms. Joanna Zakrzewska. I hereby start the vote. Please cast your votes. [Foreign language] I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. The number of votes cast for the adoption of the resolution, 139,957,594. Against, 475,225. Abstentions, 712,209. The resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. These are the results of the votes on the approval of the performance of duties of members of the supervisory board. Those who are active in this financial year were taken into account in the financial year 2025? Yes. Okay. Now let us move on to the next point of the agenda, 14, adoption of resolutions on the appointment of members of the new supervisory board of KGHM for the new 12th term. Some background information. The procedure of the appointment of the supervisory board is divided in two stages. In the first stage, we will appoint members of the management board appointed by the general meeting or under general rules. In point 15, we will appoint members of the Supervisory Board designated by the employees of the company. I have the relevant documentation summing up the elections in the company with the announcement of the election commission, which carried out the elections on the 14th and 15th of January 2026. In the announcements, we read that for the new 12th term, on behalf of the company employees of the KGHM, the following have been elected: Marcin Kaczanowski, Bogusław Szarek, Przemysław Darowski, which will be confirmed by the relevant resolutions of the General Meeting. First, we will vote on the appointments to the Supervisory Board on the general terms. Here, I would like to inform you that when preparing the General Meeting, as I've said, seven candidates were proposed. The first was by the shareholder Nationale-Nederlanden, it was on the 29th of May 2026, the information about this was published in the current report 20/2026. The candidate is Joanna Zakrzewska. She was put forward as an independent candidate to the Supervisory Board. The relevant declarations were submitted to the company, the information on this is included all in the report I have mentioned. six candidates to the Supervisory Board were submitted yesterday on the 8th of June 2026. These candidates were submitted by the State Treasury. Zbigniew Ćwiąkalski, Artur Ulrich, Łukasz Żelewski, Piotr Prugar, Ewa Banachowicz, Rafał Szmytke. I understand that the shareholder confirms these candidates. Katarzyna Witkowska, the proxy of the State Treasury. Yes, Mr. Chair, I confirm these candidates. At the same time, I would like to inform you that all candidates submitted by the State Treasury have agreed to stand as candidates, all have received the positive opinion of the relevant body. I would like to present to you, Mr. Chair, declarations of the candidates concerning their independence criteria. As I understand from these declarations, we can be sure that all the candidates meet the criteria specified in Section 16 of the statute, referring to the Act on Statutory Auditors, Audit Firms and Public Oversight. If I remember correctly. Yes, I do see this request. Yes. The situation that we have in connection with these candidates under general rules, the General Meeting appoints a maximum of seven members of the Supervisory Board. Three candidates are designated by the employees. Seven members are appointed on the general rules. At least two should meet the criteria of independence mentioned earlier. As far as I see, seven out of those seven candidates submitted fulfill these independent criteria. I would like to ask an additional question to the representative of the State Treasury. Do these declarations refer to the provisions of Article 129, Section 3 of the Act on Certified Auditors? These are very provisions, criteria, and we know that while the independent criteria differ for the stock exchange, they differ in various regulations. These ones are very precise, very strict. I would like to be reassured whether they do fulfill these criteria. The independent criteria we are referring to, these are criteria defined in the Act on Certified Auditors and Public Supervision. In Article 129 of this act, we have a catalog of criteria that the regulator deems to be relevant when it comes to defining independence. Two of these criteria are referred in section 16.5, as well as to good practices, which also refer to this Act on Certified Auditor and Public Supervision. If I'm mistaken or have omitted something, please correct me. I would also like to add that these declarations were filled and prepared using the form of the company published on its website, the company published forms of declarations used by the candidates and the parties submitting the candidates. Let me also add that the statutory rules concerning the appointment of independent members of the supervisory board are as follows. This independence should be revealed, disclosed before the election, and which is basically has taken place. I would ask the question, apart from these candidates submitted, do you want to submit any other candidates when it comes to the appointments of members of the supervisory board and the general rules. Are there any other candidates you would like to submit? Please do so now. I see there are no other candidates. The candidate list is closed. There are seven candidates, and the votes on the appointment to the supervisory board will be in the alphabetical order. We have a proposal of a framework resolution to be filled in two places. One concerns the date of the start of the term of the member of the supervisory board, because on the day of this general meeting, adopting the financial statements and other statements, the terms of the current members come to a close. It is rational to start the new terms as of tomorrow, the 10th of June. If you have a different opinion, please present it now. We are clear on one point. Each of the proposed resolutions will have this date. The ordinary general meeting of the KGHM Polska Miedź as of The blank will be filled as of the 10th of June 2026 to the composition of the supervisory board of the KGHM S.A. Mr., Mrs., Ms. for the new 12th term. Coming back to the independence. One of the candidates is the president of the CEO of the Polski Holding Hotelowy, a State Treasury company. Are there no links between this company and KGHM through the State Treasury? Perhaps this person does not meet the independence requirements. The information on the fulfillment of the criteria of independence by the candidate is not through an investigation of the candidate. It is based on a declaration submitted by the candidate. The requesting party informs us that the candidate has declared his or her independence, and that's all. No. The Financial Supervision Commission will then verify whether the company has control procedures that make sure whether a candidate is indeed independent or not. If we have a CV or resume of someone who is a CEO of a State Treasury company, I think it's relevant to ask the question whether the State Treasury, by proposing this particular person as a candidate, has carried out some internal analysis to establish whether this declaration is true. Perhaps indeed, this person may not be aware entirely of this, whether the State Treasury has carried out its own verification of these declarations. We assume that the declarations submitted by the candidates for the supervisory board are true. If there are suggestions otherwise when it comes to the authenticity of these declarations, the company will verify that. As of now, we have no grounds for questioning these declarations of independence. Let us start the votes on the resolutions on the appointment of supervisory board members, appointed under general rules by the general meetings. We have seven candidates, and the framework draft resolution will be used each time. In alphabetical order, the first concerns the candidacy of Ewa Banachowicz and the appointment of Ewa Banachowicz as a member of the supervisory board. We filled Ewa Banachowicz's name. I hereby start a secret ballot on the appointment of Ewa Banachowicz as member of the supervisory board for the new fourth term. Please cast your vote. I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. The number of votes cast for the adoption of the resolution, 97,635,190. Against, 41,131,499. Abstentions, 2,377,739. The resolution to appoint Ms. Ewa Banachowicz to the supervisory board of KGHM Polska Miedź for the fourth term has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution concerns the appointment of Mr. Zbigniew Ćwiąkalski to the supervisory board. I hereby open a secret ballot on the resolution on the appointment of Mr. Ćwiąkalski to the supervisory board of KGHM. I hereby close the vote. Let us see the results. Number of votes cast for the adoption of the resolution, 97,635,790. Against, 41,131,498. Abstentions, 2,300,77,740. The resolution has been adopted by the general meeting in a secret ballot. The next resolution will concern the appointment to the supervisory board of Mr. Piotr Prugar. Let us open a secret ballot on the resolution on the appointment of Mr. Piotr Prugar to the supervisory board. We should add the name in the nominative in the Polish language in order to avoid any doubt as to the form of the last name. Mr. Piotr Prugar. I hereby close the vote. Number of votes cast for the adoption of the resolution, 97,637,762. Against, 41,129,526. Abstentions, 2,377,739. The resolution has been adopted by the general meeting in a secret ballot. The next resolution will concern the appointment to the supervisory board of Mr. Rafał Szmytke. I hereby open this secret ballot on the appointment of Mr. Rafał Szmytke to the supervisory board. Please cast your votes. Can we finish the vote? I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. Number of votes cast for the resolution, 97,635,789. Against, 41,131,499. Abstentions, 2,377,740. The resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution will concern the appointment to the Supervisory Board of Mr. Artur Ulrich. I suggest that the last name should be added in the nominative in the content of the resolution. I hereby start the vote on the appointment of Mr. Artur Ulrich to the Supervisory Board. Can we close the vote? I hereby close the vote. The number of votes cast for the resolution, 97,635,790. Against, 41,139,498. Abstentions, 2,377,739. The resolution has been adopted by the general meeting in a secret ballot. The next resolution will concern the appointment to the Supervisory Board of Ms. Joanna Zakrzewska. I hereby open a secret ballot on this resolution. Please cast your votes. Ms. Joanna Zakrzewska, a candidate submitted by Nationale-Nederlanden. An independent candidate. I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. Number of votes cast for the adoption of the resolution, 97,635,791. Against, 41,138,497. Abstentions, 2,377,740. The resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The last voting in this cycle concerns the appointment to the Supervisory Board of Mr. Łukasz Żelewski. I hereby open the secret ballot on the resolution on the appointment of Mr. Łukasz Żelewski to the Supervisory Board. [Foreign language] The voting is in progress. [Foreign language] I hereby close the vote. Please present the results. [Foreign language] Number of votes cast for the resolution, 97,614,406. Against, 41,915,433. Abstentions, 1,615,188. The resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. Here are the results on the appointments to the Supervisory Board in point 14 of the agenda. Let us move now to point 15 and three rounds of voting on the appointment to the Supervisory Board of people selected by the employees of the group. Each of the draft resolutions is going to be completed with the date of starting the term, that is the 10th of June 2026. It is tomorrow. First, let's vote on the resolution on the appointment of Przemysław Darowski. The ordinary general meeting of KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. hereby appoints as of the 10th of June 2026 Mr. Darowski, who is a candidate of the employees of the KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. for the new 12th term. Now let's vote on this resolution. It's a secret ballot, of course. Please cast your votes now. [Foreign language] The voting is in progress. Zamykam głosowanie. Poproszę o wynik. I hereby close the vote. Let's see the results. The number of votes for, 103,357,399. Against, 10,293,119. Abstentions, 27,494,511. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the appointment of Mr. Marcin Kaczanowski to the Supervisory Board elected by the employees of the KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. Group. Let's vote on the resolution. It's a secret ballot. Please cast your votes now. Can I close the vote? Yes. I have closed the vote. Let's see the results. Vote for, 130,155,129. Vote against, 495,389, and abstentions, 27,494,511. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. The next resolution pertains to the appointment of Bogusław Szarek, elected by the employees of the KGHM Polska Miedź Group to the Supervisory Board. Let's have a secret ballot on the resolution. Please cast your votes now. I hereby close the vote. The number of votes for, 90,395,544. Vote against, 22,594,711. Abstentions, 27,494,511. I hereby state that the resolution has been adopted in a secret ballot. These are the results of the appointments to the Supervisory Board for the 12th term of those members of the Supervisory Board elected by the employees of KGHM Polska Miedź. Having appointed these persons, we have completed point number 15 of the agenda. Point 16 is the closing of the Ordinary General Meeting. This is what I'm doing right now. Thank you very much to all the participants, and I hereby close the Ordinary General Meeting