Thank you. Please take me to slide two. Hi, my name is Gustaf Öhrn. I'm the acting CEO of BHG since August this year. I'm here together with Jesper Flemme, CFO, to do a short presentation of the Q3 report and do our very best to answer your questions. Slide three. Today's agenda in short that we will take you through the financial highlights of the quarter and a few words about the market and the strategic ambitions and the future and the structure of the business looking forward. Then Jesper will do a financial update, and I will in the end do my very best to summarize, and we'll both be available for the Q&A. As I believe that some of you listened to our communication in conjunction with our recent communication of the stock write-down, I do apologize that there will be some repetition. Slide five. Short about the financial highlights. Sales came in what we see as decent levels considering the market circumstances. We have an overall growth of 1.5%. With this, we believe that we continue to take market share in a market with softening demand. It should be noted that order intake was approximately SEK 100 million higher than sales, primarily due to sales of heat pumps with long delivery times, orders taken in Q3, but then will be delivered in Q4. With what we considered a relatively strong top line, earnings came in a somewhat weaker than expected with a realized EBIT margin of 1.5%, driven primarily by price pressure in the market and to some extent also on cost increase, primarily in the direct selling cost. Cash flow was better than last year, but still negative, negatively driven by seasonal fluctuations, and is the result of strong sales in order intake in the second quarter that is then paid for in the third quarter. Slide six. To put a bit of context on why we are taking forceful actions on both short term and also to provide some clarification on our longer term strategic ambitions, we decided to provide some information about the recent market development and the longer term development of the BHG Group. This is our view of the market development, and as no surprise to anyone, demand was extremely strong throughout the peak of the pandemic and has since leveled off, primarily due to what we called corona rebalancing effects, both in channel and category. BHG being online and home, we were massively, positively impacted by the pandemic effect and consequently suffered in the rebalancing. Since spring, also impacted by the war in Ukraine and the following geopolitical disturbances, rent increases, energy prices, and inflation, and as a consequence of all of the above, weakening consumer demand. We believe that by now, much of what we call the rebalancing effect of the pandemic is diminishing, although not all gone yet, but the geopolitical effects, energy pricing, rent levels, et cetera, has been even further strengthened, leading to now record low consumer confidence. Considering all of the above, we perceive BHG sales in the third quarter as a sign of strength. As an intro to the structural changes and the revised strategy that we are implementing, we believe it is relevant to take one step back and review the development of BHG in a longer perspective. 10 years ago, BHG was Bygghemma.se, a SEK 200 million business in Sweden. Since then, we have had exceptional organic growth and been further fueled by some 37 acquisitions to take us to where we are today, a European business with SEK 13 billion in sales. I mention this because the focus has been solely on growth. With this as a background and with a changing market situation, we need to, and are in the process of revising our strategy to what we call Olympia or the next phase for BHG, including an increased focus on cash flow and cost levels. In a shorter perspective, viewing our business in a 12-month scenario, it becomes evident just how fundamental the change that has occurred in the last year has been. One year ago, we were still in a pandemic. Demand was strong. We were experiencing massive supply chain disruptions as a consequence of strong demand and weak supply. Visualized by astronomical freight costs with a container at the peak costing more than $20,000 to ship from Asia to Europe. Now, one year later, we have a war in Europe. We have an energy crisis of massive proportions. We have record high inflation. We have high and increasing rent levels. We have record low consumer confidence, falling demand, and the container freight from Asia now costing in the region of $4,000. We believe and plan for a continued tough market in the consumer sector for the following 12-18 months. It is based on this scenario. We are implementing the current short-term actions. We do so to future-proof BHG and to come out of this tough market situation when it does normalize stronger than we went into it. Please take me to slide seven. Short-term, as we have communicated two weeks ago, we have taken the following actions. We have implemented structure and organization changes to facilitate our revised strategy, including consolidations and synergies. More on this later. We are reducing our cost levels. We have targeted a SEK 150 million-SEK 200 million reduction, primarily in organizational cost and warehousing. We have reduced our stock levels by approximately 100 million SEK in the third quarter, and we have set a target to reduce the level by another 100-200 million SEK in the fourth quarter. We continued further reductions to free up capital in 2023. In discussions with our banks, we have agreed on a temporary covenant relief until the end of 2023, and we have decided upon and executed a stock write-down of SEK 375 million, primarily on seasonal products that was not sold to the extent we planned for during this year's spring and summer season. Please take me to slide eight. As you have all understood by now, we foresee a tough market environment the coming 12-18 months, with limited opportunities for growth in the organic business. We are, as explained, taking actions on both cost and cash flow. However, with that said, we are retailers, and as such, we must always look to drive top line. Also in tough market, there is opportunities, and some of the potential sources of growth we see include. Several of our businesses had already, prior to the market downturn, initiated internationalization with sites in new market as a source of sales growth. The beauty of the online model is that this can be done with very limited cost and cash flow. We also see opportunities to grow through external marketplaces, making our product available in new markets through international marketplaces. This primarily valid for our Value Home segment with its main business in the private label sector. To facilitate assortment expansion and intercompany sales between our different businesses without driving cost or stock levels, we are setting up an internal marketplace between our entities. In crisis, there is and will always occur opportunities. We are confident that there will be white spots available to grow in when competitors go out of business or leave categories, and we will be there to take them. Finally, currently, our focus on M&A, for obvious reasons, is limited. When the market recoups, there will be opportunities for those who are financially strong, and we plan and act to be so. Last but not least, in these tough times, it's important to remember that the structural trends that has taken us to where we are today, I'm talking about online migration from the physical channel, and the interest in home and home environments remains unchanged and intact. A few words about our strategic ambition, our structural and the organizational changes. Please take me to slide 10. We have the last few months spent considerable efforts in defining our future strategy. This is done in a project we call Project Olympia, and we have defined what we believe is the next phase for BHG. The main ambition has been to define the future strategic direction for the group and also to reduce complexity, a needed initiative after 10 years of expansion and 37 acquisitions with focus on growth rather than simplification and consolidation. Also to find and realize synergies, both revenue synergies such as through intercompany sales and cross-selling, but also cost synergies. As an example, we see big opportunities in supply chain, in warehousing, scalable IT platforms, et cetera. Please take me to slide 11. One of the structural changes we have done is dividing our business into three business units based on the consumer profile, but also based on the business model. Home Improvement based on a drop-ship model with Bygghemma as its lead brand. This we will consolidate and build into what we call the pan-Nordic do-it-yourself powerhouse. Value Home, primarily based on private label with Trademax as a lead brand. We also here see opportunities to merge businesses and expand through external marketplaces. Finally, Premium Living, where we are accelerating internationalization and the sales of premium Scandinavian design based on the wholesale model with Nordic Nest and Svenssons as lead brands. Dividing the business into these three business units facilitates complexity reduction, but also we do this because we are confident that this is where the main synergies are to be realized. The main synergies will be rather on business unit level rather than on group level. We have also operationally strengthened our group management team with the three BU leads, we all have extensive operational CEO experience. Please take me to slide 12. This means structuring our business in three levels, with group continuing to be a super slim structure, defining overall strategies, corporate functions as finance, IR, and with centers of excellence in areas as tech, HR, ESG, et cetera, to support the business unit. The business unit in which we define the strategic direction for the business units, and as mentioned, where the majority of the realization of synergies will take place in the areas mentioned as supply chain, warehousing, IT, et cetera. Finally, the entities, controlling all front-end functions, the customer understanding, defining the business concept, defining product and pricing, setting marketing and a promotion, et cetera. Thank you. With that, I'll hand it over to Jesper. Thank you, Gustaf. In the third quarter, we further advanced our positions despite a difficult market. Sales were relatively strong, but profitability was weak. Net sales increased 1.5%, reaching SEK 3.1 billion. Organic growth amounted to -5% and pro forma organic growth to -7%. Total growth was driven by the home furniture segment, where the premium segment led by Nordic Nest and Svenssons showed the highest growth along with our Eastern European furniture business, Furniturebox. Adjusted EBIT amounted to SEK 48 million, corresponding to an EBIT margin of 1.5%. The EBIT margin was negatively impacted by primarily price pressure in the market due to weak demand. Turning to page 15 and the EBIT bridge. The product margin in the quarter was negatively impacted by price pressure in the market as a result of weak demand. Direct selling costs increased in the period as a result of elevated fuel prices and high inventory levels. The increase in organizational costs from same period last year is mainly due to increases in personnel related costs. As Gustaf mentioned, we are executing on substantial cost reduction initiatives to adjust our fixed cost base to the lower demand. Finally, the increase in depreciation and amortization in relation to sales was primarily driven by weak sales and new lease agreements. All in all, our EBIT margin amounted to a disappointing 1.5% in the third quarter. Let us turn to cash flow. Slide 16, please. Cash flow from operating activities improved compared to last year and amounted to SEK -133 million, negatively impacted by changes in working capital as a result of supplier payments during the period. Reducing inventory is key to improving cash flow. Items held in inventory were reduced by SEK 98 million during the third quarter. A target has been set to initially reduce items held in inventory by an additional SEK 100-200 million in the fourth quarter and thereby improving cash flow from operating activities. The right-hand graph showing the development in liquidity walks us through the starting period position of SEK 274 million, deducting the cash flow from operations and the impact of investing activities, a majority of which is M&A related, and finally adding the financing activities which are primarily related to the new share issue completed in the second quarter, but also include amortization of leasing liabilities, bringing us to the period end SEK 692 million of liquidity at hand. Slide 17, please. The group's net debt amounted to SEK 2.1 billion at the end of the quarter, and net debt in relation to LTM adjusted EBITDA ended at 3.4 x. We have renegotiated and been granted a temporary relief on covenants by our banks. The relief will remain in force from Q3 this year up to and including Q4 next year. In addition, acquisition-related liabilities have decreased and amounts to SEK 1.4 billion at the end of the quarter, compared to SEK 1.8 billion at the end of the second quarter. Cash flow-wise, we assess that roughly SEK 350 million will be paid out next year and another SEK 75 million in 2024. On top of our liquidity at hand, we had unutilized credit facilities at the end of the quarter of SEK 500 million. Handing it back over to you, Gustaf, to summarize and conclude. Thank you, Jesper. Q3 summary. Trying to summarize this. We are considering the challenging market circumstances, happy with the top-line development and trust that we took market share in the quarter. We are doing structural and organizational changes to facilitate the implementation of a revised strategy. We have launched a number of actions to respond to the challenging market, including cost and inventory reductions to improve both profit and cash flow, as well as we have executed a stock write-down and renegotiated our covenants. We feel confident that our actions and our plan will take us back to the defined capital structure. With all these challenging messages, it feels important to again remind ourselves that the structural trends that has built BHG to what it is remains intact. I'm talking about primarily the migration from the physical to the digital channel and the continued interest in our home and home environment. Thank you, and looking forward to do our very best to answer your questions. Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you'd like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. We have our first question from the line of Benjamin Wahlstedt from ABG. Please go ahead. Hello and good morning. Just two short questions from me. First of all, I note that direct selling costs seem to hurt margins, especially in the DIY segment. How can we work? Could you give us a bit more color on that, please? Good morning, Benjamin. The direct selling cost, it's mainly the effect from inventory levels as fulfillment go up and also the effect from increased fuel prices. Sure. These would be relevant for the home furnishing segment as well, right? At least the way I'm calculating it, the share of sales is not higher this quarter than it was in Q3 2021 for home furnishing. How do we understand that? If we look at the do-it-yourself segment, we have seen a decline in efficiency. That's the easiest way to describe it. Driving fulfillment costs up in relation to sales. Yeah, got it. Thank you. One more question. Your net debt to EBITDA ratio to 3.4, that's on pro forma EBITDA. Is that the way the banks would measure your debt level as well? Yes. On pro forma numbers, that is. Yeah. Okay, perfect. That was it for me. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. We have our next question from the line of Gustav Hagius. Please go ahead. Thank you. This is Gustav Hagius with SEB. A few questions if I may. Firstly on this stock write-down that you announced previously, could you give some more light on sort of how the work has been conducted in identifying those items? Have you sort of gone category by category? Sort of, how have you accounted for this? Have you made a reduction in expected sellout price, sort of halved it, or have you written it down fully as unsellable? If that's the case, where are these products? Do you still have them or have you disposed them somehow? Thank you, Gustav. I will try starting to say that it has been a thorough job on SKU level, trying to really identify the need for write-down. With that said, of course we need a model. We can't go through all of our products. The way we have done it is, it's an accrual, and it's not like the products have been written down 100%. It's a, you know, between 50% and 30%, and we still have the products and they are sellable. If I add. Yeah. Sorry. Please. Gustaf here. Adding very much of those products as we mentioned is spring and summer products. The majority of the sale from those will come back next year in Q2, in Q3. Yeah. If you've written down sort of the inventory value with half, I assume the sellout is also like 30%-40% higher than the value in your inventory or how is that accounted for? How much lower does the net price need to be in order for you not to have a capital gain in the summer months on these products if you sell them? Inventory value reflects the realizable value as we see it right now. On the one-offs, I recognize the SEK 5.5 million gardening leave one-off. I assume that's for the departed CEO. Is that the total amount? Will there be additional costs related to this also in Q4 in 2023? There will be no additional cost relating to changing CEO. All right. On the same note for one-time costs, I note that you again now in Q3 bring up strategy work as a one-off. Can you confirm if Q3 concludes that one-off, apparent one-off or should we expect further one-time costs related to strategy work going forward? No, we do not expect any more cost relating to the strategy work. All right. On the covenant waiver, could you shed some light on the level of generosity from the lenders? I assume you cannot go infinitely high in terms of gearing or how is that new structure set up? We will not disclose the actual terms, but of course there's a limit to the levers that we can have during next year. We feel that the headroom that we have now is the one that we need to be able to get back on track during 2023. In that scenario, if you feel that that is enough, I assume you have a view on your organic sales decline for 2023. Could you confirm whether or not that's double digit or not going into that assumption that the waiver will be enough for you to ride through 2023? As you know, we don't share any forward-looking prognosis, and we'll not do that in this case either. Only thing I can say is basically what Jesper said before. We of course do our plan, and of course we have our thoughts about next year and we feel confident that we have the sufficient headroom needed. I will not disclose any figures on what we calculate for. The thing I can assure you is, you know, the reason why we're doing all the actions we are doing is that we think it's the prudent thing to do right now. Nobody knows how tough the market is gonna be next year, but not making the precautions to prepare ourselves for a tough market would be the wrong thing to do, and that is what we are doing. We're preparing ourselves for what we believe can be a tough market, and we have set the plan and the actions so that if that happens, we should still be able to come through it. All right. Final one from me. Could you give us a little bit of an update on your warehouse status now? You obviously have Kalmar and Helsingborg. I assume you try to consolidate as much as possible in there, but what's the strategy there and the potential and how many warehouses are you hosting at the moment and how many you feel that you will have by the end of 2023? I will not share exactly how many we will have, but we have a number of warehouses today, and it ties back very much to what I said in the presentation. We have 10 years of, you know, complete focus on growth and very little on consolidating, and there is significant opportunities to consolidate. One of them is warehousing. On top of that, we've also now, since our stock level has gone up, been forced to take on extra warehouses. I think some of those we will be able to get out of already next year. I think some of the consolidation measures, they will take longer, because many of them are tied up in contracts, et cetera, and also requires, you know, some longer term work on IT platforms, et cetera. Some of the savings from consolidations will be realized next year, and others will take longer. It's a fantastic. And final- opportunity for savings. Yes. On that note, do you also see any potential to consolidate or merge holdings of yours to make it a little bit less complex? I'm not sure if it's plausible given the entrepreneurs in each company, but is that something that you also consider or is it within this SEK 150 million-SEK 200 million savings that you communicated? It's not within the savings. The savings is based on what we can believe we can do within the current structure. Yes, there is ambitions for consolidations within the group. With that said, we still very much believe in the decentralized model, and we very much believe that the accountability of the entrepreneurs is extremely essential. We stay in that model, but we also see opportunities where we think there's better value and better focus if we decide to consolidate entities. Great. Sorry, one final one. -5% organic growth performance in the quarter. I assume it was a little bit worse towards the end of the quarter than in the beginning. Could you give some color on what your exit rate was in terms of organic growth into Q4? You also write that you expect it to get worse before it gets better, so I assume you see a deterioration here gradually. Actually, it was relatively even throughout the quarter. We haven't seen a huge difference in September compared to going into the quarter. Okay. Thank you. Those were all my questions. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We have our next question from the line of Mislav Ikman. Please go ahead. Thank you. Yes, a couple of questions. Firstly, can you elaborate a little bit on the recruitment of a permanent CEO? It sounds like from the profile you're describing that you would be looking at an internal recruitment, but that should be. If so, that should be done fairly quickly. Can you elaborate a little bit here what you're looking for? Are you looking internally, externally, or both? We're looking for an operational profile, and we have come, you know, decent part in that work, but I can't share any more information on the process as you can understand. It's the operational background within online retail is what we're looking for. Okay. Thank you. Follow up on the covenants here. Am I right to assume that you've had a relief from covenants here, but you still have to pay higher interest rates if you're in breach of the initial covenants, which I believe are at 3.5 x EBITDA? If so, can you provide any kind of rough guidance for what you expect in terms of financial net for 2023, and particularly considering that interest rates have gone up quite a bit in recent months? You're absolutely right. A higher leverage comes with a higher margin from the banks. I will not give you exact number, but I can say that it might be a doubling of the margin from the banks. That's the way it can be. A doubling of the margin and then also rising interest rates on top of that, you mean? Yes. Okay. Fair enough. A little bit on the earn outs as well here. SEK 1.4 billion, that's still a fairly high number. As I understand, a very significant part of this is related to 2025 to 2027. I assume a significant part of those earn outs are based on expectations of strong earnings recovery. Is that correct? If earnings stay at depressed levels, your earn out fees would be a lot lower than SEK 1.4 billion. Is that a correct assumption? Absolutely. I mean, I've said this before, it's always the fact that when we close a quarter, it's our best guess of what the actual payment will be. As you say, they are depending on performance of underlying businesses. If profitability stays at this level, the amount to be paid out will be way smaller. Very good. Thanks. Just also a follow-up here on your outlook statements here, where you're talking about a challenging next 12-18 months, and you're even saying that you expect things to get worse before they get better. Obviously, in Q3 versus Q2, you saw a sequential improvement in sales. You say that things have not deteriorated towards the end of the quarter. So what are you basing and particularly considering the comparisons are gradually becoming easier here as well, what are you basing the assumption that things will get a lot worse before they get better? Are you talking top line or earnings or both? We're talking primarily about top line, or at least I am. It's very much based on consumer confidence. I wouldn't say that I have any more information than you guys on that one. Consumer confidence has come down very low. From my perspective, I think you know, sales in general is holding up surprisingly well considering the consumer confidence in the market. You know, with the development that is happening right now, all the disposable income will come down. That is the reason why we believe that it's gonna be tougher in the consumer sector in the 12-18 months to be. We don't know if that will happen or not, but it's definitely the prudent thing right now to plan for it and take the actions necessary if that realizes. I think there's a good reason to believe that it will happen. With the measures you're doing now, do you think that those will be sufficient to keep you above break even in the coming quarters as well? Obviously assuming we don't see a very sharp slowdown in sales. If we see a decline of a similar magnitude as we've seen now in recent quarters, do you think you are well-positioned to stay above break even throughout 2023? I'm not gonna comment on that because then we start giving prognoses forward, which we decided not to do. As I said, I think we have done what is sufficient and needed to do in order to, you know, come back when we come out of this, to the strong position we went into it, and also to stay within the capital structure which we need to be within. That's the only information I can share with you. Yep. Fair enough. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you very much. Thank you. Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. To ask a question, please press star and one on your phone. There are no questions. Thank you very much. Appreciate you listening in. Thank you.