Good morning, everyone. What happened with the sound? That was a great start. Welcome to this Q3 report of Bravida's presentation today. It seems like we have some issues with the sound. Meanwhile, together with me today is... Petra Vranjes. Hello. Our CFO, yes. Together with Petra, I will take you through and guide you through this presentation. Thank you for that. I think we start immediately. Are we fine with the sound? Yes. Thumbs up. We start. Bravida, as you know, presence in 190 different locations. We were 14,000 employees in 2024. We are unfortunately a bit fewer people today. Hopefully, when the market gets back again, we'll start to grow the company again. We had in 2024 close to SEK 30 billion in sales in four different countries. By that, we are going into the highlights for this third quarter of 2025. Very happy to see a very strong performance in Denmark. Denmark is contributing to the margin improvement for the whole group with 80 basis points. We are improving our margin to 5.3% in a very demanding market. I think that is very strong. As a CEO, of course, you work daily with things you can improve. You think that you can have done some things better. I also have to admit that in this market condition, I think it's very strong to be able to improve the margin like we have done in this quarter. EPS increased with 24%. Denmark is executing due to the plan we have communicated earlier, or slightly better, actually. The guidance for the full year is still close to 5%. Throughout this year we have been more and more confident that we should, Christian and his team will deliver on that one. Acquisition contributes with 2.5%. We also see an increased order intake in Finland with healthy margins, which is really good. We have an operation cash flow that is due to timing issues, slightly weaker than we wanted to be. On the other hand, at the same time last year, we were around 130% cash conversion. There is a timing issue depending on some large projects. The net sales is down 2% roughly. The main reason, except for the market as such, is of course that we are very thorough in what kind of projects and business we bring into our portfolio. The restricted project selection has contributed to the low net sales and of course also the improved margin. That is going hand in hand. EBITDA in the quarter, the margin increased to 5.3%. As I said, the driver behind this is that the margin is significantly improved in Denmark, despite a weak market. Very good from the Danish team. At the same time, we have very stable margins in Norway and Sweden in a tough market. Finland, a lower margin. That is more depending on an isolated issue in one branch or few projects. I guess Petra will come back to that later. Order intake and backlog. The order intake is up 5%. Might be a positive sign. I think it's still too early to say that the market will turn. We still think that it will take a bit into 2026 before we see that the growth is coming back in our books. Activity has increased a bit, but the order backlog is on a stable level. We are very happy with the quality of the orders we have in our books today. The market is a bit challenging, but an increased or improved order intake and a stable order backlog is of course very good to see. Maybe worth mentioning is that the order book increased in Sweden and Finland in the quarter. ESG, the change in CO2 emissions is down 42% if we compare to the net sales in 2020. It is improved with close to 15% the last 12 months. Especially happy we are with the improved work with health and safety. The accident rate is improved, and it's now at 5, which is lower than our target. It's lower than last year, which was 5.9. A low number is good. Norway, Sweden is better than our group target. Finland has improved a lot. Denmark is working hard to get down in this KPI as well to improve that work. It is very good to see that we are moving in the right direction regarding the ESG KPIs as well as we are improving the margin at the same time as we're improving the margin, I would say. Acquisitions. We have done two acquisitions until the third quarter, adding SEK 300 million plus in annual sales. In the fourth quarter, we have added another two acquisitions, one in Sweden and one in Norway. Slightly smaller ones, but with good margins. The pipeline is still strong. We have good quality in the pipeline. A lot of discussion, but as I said the last couple of quarters, it is a bit more tricky to close the deals depending on, and the main reason is the market condition. Sometimes we want to do the deal, but the sellers might think that they are performing slightly below what they are used to do. When some want to sell, we maybe are a bit too cautious because their performance is going south or is not in the level we want it to be. Good pipeline, but slightly more trickier to actually close the deals. With that, I hand over to Petra, who will take you through the different segments. Thank you, Mattias. Looking at the different segments, we will start with Sweden as usual. In Sweden, we have seen a growth of negative 7%, mainly explained by the softer market in the southern parts of Sweden. We have also closed down some branches there in quarter four, which brings the sales down. We do have an impact of acquisition in the quarter isolated. It's positively impacted by 4%. When we look at the year to date, the number is 2% of the impact from the acquisition. Sweden has closed on an EBITDA margin of SEK 172 million, which is 6% flat on the quarter, down from 6.3% with the lower sales and top line then. When we look at the year to date, we can see that Sweden is performing on a flat EBITDA margin of 5.7%. Very good performance considering the lower top line that we see there. On the order side, we have had a positive book-to-bill in the quarter, and the orders booked came in 33% higher than last year's quarter. For the year to date, Sweden is down on the backlog with 9% year over year. I should also mention that in Sweden, we have an ongoing review of the organizational governance and steering, and we are expecting some efficiencies from that to come. When we then look at Denmark, Denmark has performed very good. They are executing diligently on their plan, and with that, they have increased the sales with 23% organically. Impacted by the currency effect of 3%, we are at 20% positive growth in the quarter. We can see that both services sales and installation sales are increasing, services up 15% and installation by 24% year over year. The EBITDA margin up to 5.5% from a negative EBITDA margin last year. Denmark is contributing with more than SEK 100 million in the isolated quarter. If we look at the year-to-date numbers, we have Denmark up 470 basis points year over year. On the order intake, Denmark is down 32% in this isolated quarter. However, looking at the year-to-date numbers, we can see that the backlog has increased with 8%. Very strong from the Danish team on the execution on their plan. Norway, here we can see that Norway came in on SEK 1.2 billion, and that is a sales decline of 10% in the quarter. Also, Norway is affected by the currency exchange, and they are down 3% on the currency exchange. Organically, a 7% decline for Norway in the isolated quarter. Norway is also performing well on their EBITDA margin considering the sales decrease. They are coming in on 5.7% EBITDA in the quarter. We can see that the year-to-date number, they are improving the EBITDA margin to 5.6% from 5.4%. Strong execution on securing the cost side from Norway. On the order booking, we have a slight decline, 9% in the quarter. The year-to-date then order backlog is up also in Norway. Looking at Finland, Finland has closed on SEK 528 million with a close to zero EBITDA margin depending on the low top line in Finland and a couple of two projects that we have taken write-downs for in Finland in one branch. That brings the EBITDA margin to 0.6% in the quarter. The growth or decline of 18% is affected by currency exchange rates in Finland as well, 2% down and also positively from acquisitions where we see a 5% increase in top line. Year-to-date EBITDA margin is of course also impacted by this quarter's write-downs and is landing on 1.6% compared to 3.8% in last year's year-to-date numbers. On the order side, Finland came in very strongly. They are booking small, medium-sized orders. They also have in this quarter closed a deal for the industrial facility in Finland. The orders are then 66% for the isolated quarter. Finland actually booked SEK 749 million in order intake in the quarter. Backlog is also up 15% on the year-to-date numbers. That was the segment. Let's look at the net debt and cash flow. On the cash conversion, like Mattias was mentioning, we do have a weaker cash conversion in the quarter. We are at 63% compared to 134% last year. We have a negative cash from operating units. It came in on negative SEK 111 million. This is due to buildup of contractual assets for some of our larger projects that are executing. In the larger projects, we have early advance payments, which we have received earlier years. We had a very good cash conversion last year above 130%. Now we are executing on those contracts. They are invoicing according to the contracts and contractual terms and conditions and executing as they should. Cash varies over the quarter for those large contracts. When we look at the net debt, we can see that we have SEK 3.5 billion of net debt. Interest-bearing liabilities close at SEK 4.1 billion, including SEK 1.5 billion of commercial papers and SEK 1.4 billion of lease. Our credit facility of revolving credits is SEK 2.5 billion, of which we had SEK 2.1 billion as unused credit facility end of September. Our net debt to EBITDA ratio is at 1.5x. Our target is to be below 2.5x. We are well within that target. With that, I welcome Mattias back to take us through the highlights. Thank you so much, Petra. The highlights or summary for Q3 is I think that we have an improved EBITDA and improved margin. The EBITDA is 342 compared to 294, and the margin is 5.3% compared to 4.5%. I think that is very much because of a great job from all the local leaders and the branches and all the personnel in the branches. Good cost control and very thorough work with all the businesses we actually are providing to all our customers. EPS up 24%. This is at the same time as the top line is actually down 2.2%. With that, I think also you can see that we had a negative organic growth. I think it was 7% or 8% last quarter. It's slightly better now. I think that the market has bottomed out. It hasn't improved. It will take some quarters before that will happen, I guess. If that happens sooner, I think that's better, of course. We can see that installation sales is flat, and we are losing some percent in the service business. I think that is because the normal type of business is impacted by the market demand. There are some infrastructure projects, defense facilities, et cetera, that's actually driving the installation portfolio a bit more than it normally does. Organic growth minus 3%. We have acquisitions where we're actually adding 2.5%, and then we have some headwinds from the currency. We see increased order intake in Finland and Sweden. Operating cash flow, Petra just talked about, which is a timing issue, you can say. As she said, it was above 130% this time last year, and now it's slightly lower. We are, of course, working with that. There are some contracts that are deciding when to let us invoice, so it's not any other reason behind that. We have improved LTIFR and very good KPIs regarding our CO2 emissions. Going to the market outlook, service activity continues to be stable. There will be challenges in the installation business. There will be some positive opportunities regarding slightly bigger projects in the infrastructure segments and also, of course, the defense facilities. I earlier have said that the defense investment hasn't really started in Sweden, but we now can see that that are starting to grow, which is, of course, positive and can give us some tailwind going forward. With that said, it is important to understand that we will continue to be very selective regarding what kind of business we bring into our portfolio. Having a balance between the risk exposure and the business we're bringing in is important. I think that is the main reason why we have been able to improve our margin in this quite tough market. It seems like the market has bottomed out. From now on, I hope we can go up. It will probably take, as I said, a couple of quarters more before it does. We are preparing us as a company, improving us as a company so we can go into the next cycle as a better company than we entered into this existing cycle. With that, I think we open up for Q&As. If you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial pound key six on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Carl Ragnerstam from Nordea. Please go ahead. Good morning. It's Carl here from Nordea. A couple of questions. Firstly, coming back to the cash flows, I appreciate your comments on it. We have previously, in the previous quarter, discussed the milestone payments of what is suspected to be the bypass project. What is your view on that right now? How certain are you? I mean, is it to ensure me and the market that it's not a conflict coming up or an issue at all in those contracts where you're not getting paid? Thank you, Carl, for the question. Good morning. When it comes to the large projects, they do have this cash intake in advance. A lot of cash comes in early. In this specific project, we got a lot of cash a couple of years ago, and it's been ongoing. When we are talking about milestones, there are many, many milestones in the project, and we are invoicing as we go. It's not like the project is stagnant and not doing any invoicing. We've got a lot of cash up front. We are executing. It builds up assets, and we are invoicing according to the contract. It will have a buildup of assets first before we actually do get out of it. If you look at the project in total, there's not an issue with the cash conversion in those large projects. If you look at an isolated quarter or year, you might see the tendencies of a fluctuation. OK, that's good. I can sense quite a big difference in the communication between what you said in Q2 and now Q3. When we listened to your Q2 conf call, it sounded like it was specifically one big project where you had a couple of hundred million SEK that you expected to invoice during Q3 or Q4. Now I sense that you no longer expect this, or you don't see that dynamic at all. What is the difference there? We are actually expecting invoicing, and we are invoicing. This project invoiced quite a significant amount of money in Q3 as well, and we'll do that in Q4 as well. However, we are building more on the assets than we expected, and we expected because we haven't been deep diving into the project per se. Now we have done that a bit more, that's why we have more information. It's not just one project. If you look at the cash intake in the last year, if you look at 2024, you have 130%+ of cash conversion. You do have more other projects, primarily from Denmark, coming in with a lot of cash in last year. That's why you hear a little bit difference in the tone, because we have more projects coming in that have a conversion earlier and now are in the same phase as the big project in Sweden. Yeah, and also, if I may add, Petra, if you look at the numbers for 2020, at that time, we also said that we have a lot of pre-invoice in one big project. I think that is explaining why we have a slightly weaker situation in these quarters where we are right now. That is actually a couple of years ago. That is also things that happen in these large projects where we actually are one of the few who have the competence, but also have the balance sheet to provide those services. We, of course, price the risk and the cash part into the margin when we are bidding for these projects. OK, that is clear. Just finally, on this discussion, sorry for not letting it go that easily, the SEK 400 million-SEK 500 million we discussed before, you don't anticipate it for the Swedish operation to come in Q4 or Q1 then? I mean, those money are not existing anymore then, that we discussed before. The SEK 400 million-SEK 500 million? A couple of hundred million, I think. Yeah. We discussed that in previous quarters. Definitely in the range of SEK 100 million- SEK 200 million. There are hundreds of millions absolutely coming in. We are also building the project at the same time. OK, so the milestone payments are not coming basically in Q4 or Q1? There are some coming. On the other hand, we have a very high production now, and part of the production we are doing now is things we invoiced three years ago. Another way to answer it, Carl, is that this is a cash flow issue. It is not a margin issue. We have not a dispute with the customer. It's just that we have a professional customer who wants to tick the boxes for the different milestones before we are allowed or can send the invoice. That is the situation for now. In 2020, I think we had a cash conversion of 135%. The main reason behind that, as we said then, was pre-invoicing in a large project. I think overall in the project, we have a good or OK cash situation. Now, if you look at the certain period of that project, a project that is actually going on for many, many years, then for now, these 12 months, it is a weak explanation for the numbers you see these last 12 months and in this quarter. OK, that's good. Looking into Denmark, quite strong word in the quarter, definitely. You're still guiding, as I interpret it, below 5% or maybe touching 5%. Sequentially, we have seen Q4 typically being significantly stronger. Why are you not more confident in reaching above 5%? Is it just to be maybe prudent? No, we have no reason. I think we have delivered on what we have said in Denmark, absolutely. As I said in an interview earlier, we are more confident today than we were. We have been more and more confident for every quarter that we will reach the guidance we have given to you. I think if it's prudent or not, I don't know. We will stay with the guidance slightly below or at around 5%. Do you still expect the seasonal pattern? Yeah, to some extent. Of course, I think it's written in the report as well. We still have some projects with lower margin to finalize. They are fewer today than they were a quarter ago, and they are impacting less than they did before. Yeah, maybe you're right, Carl. I hope you're right. We normally do not guide at all, so we stay with what we have said before, and we are very confident that we will deliver on that. Yeah, that's my answer. Thank you. The final one, if I may, sorry if I ask, is regarding the reviewing of the Swedish organization. You say it's to improve efficiency and governance. What are you actually doing in Sweden? Can you shed some light to what the plan is? Yeah, absolutely. You haven't seen that externally because we have had the segments as countries: Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. However, internally, Sweden has been steered and governed differently from the other countries. We have had more than one. We have had three to four in times, I understand, also divisions. Now we are reviewing that to consolidate some of this and to get a clearer and better steering of Sweden as a country like the other countries as well. In that, we are expecting some efficiencies to come out. OK, very clear. Can you quantify the efficiencies as well? Not at this moment, we cannot. We are still reviewing. OK, very clear. Thank you. Thank you, Carl. Thank you. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Johan Lönnqvist Sundén from DNB Carnegie. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Good morning. Good morning. If we start a little bit on the Swedish business, just curious to hear a little bit more color on the kind of lower organic growth we see in the Swedish service business. Any indication or what's behind it, basically? I think that is the reason behind the tough market. If you take out or take away the slightly larger projects in the infrastructure, defense industry, the pharma, et cetera, you would see the same pattern on the installations. I think that is just a sign of a tough market. It's still very stable. There are some positive segments on the installation business that might be seen from your perspective, that the installation is stronger than the service business. The service business is still very stable. There are some impacts from, for example, small projects on the service business where our customers are more cautious about their investment. They are doing the normal service, but the small renovation project, et cetera, is missing for the moment. I think that is just how the market looks. That's how I want to answer that one. Did you understand what I meant? Yeah, I just don't understand the wording of stable when it's falling 11% year over year. I think that has been the trend. My view on the market is that it has bottomed out. It has stopped being worse, but it hasn't really improved. Why does the question come back to the pricing in general? Is there a big pricing pressure on the service contract that makes you step away a little bit, or is it any of those kind of elements? The new contracts, there is, of course, a price pressure. Existing contracts we are delivering on as is. Of course, there is a price pressure in a market like this, absolutely. If you go to the installation business and just looking at the order intake and visibility from your side going into Q4, Q1 here, how much of a step down on pricing should we anticipate? Yeah, we try to defend our margin, of course. I think also the volume might be in some places, we actually have reached some kind of critical size where we maybe don't want to scale down more. I think the margin will probably more be impacted by slightly higher cost than a lower price from now on, I think. The prices, if I should say something about the prices, I think they have maybe improved a bit, but on low levels. When you say it has improved, it's on the tenders in Q3 that should be delivered upon H1 2026. Yeah, exactly. It's not a big change. I think it's still a quite demanding market. We, from time to another, hear that we hear some competitors taking prices very, very low. That is happening in a good market as well. If we look at the Finnish business, some write-downs in this quarter. Yep. Should we anticipate more write-downs coming in Q4, Q1, or is this isolated to this quarter? How should we view it? We think that the Finnish margin will go up the coming quarters. Even if we have a tough market in Finland, those write-downs are isolated to one branch, you can say. We have very good control and our eyes on it. We have done measures already, and we will continue to focus to improve that branch, of course. The margin in Finland will improve the coming quarters. Yeah? Yes, we are expecting that. The Finnish business is otherwise a bit hampered under low sales, and as you can see, they have closed some good projects and good contracts. We're not expecting that part. The isolated write-down was two projects in one branch, and that one we're not expecting going forward. Things can, of course, always happen. We do price risks in our projects, and you can always have write-downs coming up every now and then. We're not expecting that in Finland in the near future, at least. A final question from my side. It's related to the question from Carl before. It's on the cash flow profile and working capital profile. What should we anticipate on the working capital swings in the coming, say, two, three, four quarters? We are expecting an improved sequential cash conversion for Q4. I'm not supposed to guide. Mattias is telling me every now and then I'm not supposed to guide. We are expecting, of course, a bit improved cash flow. I wouldn't be expecting the 130 million unless we get some really big contracts and they bring on board advance payments. I would expect a bit lower than that, definitely, but improved compared to this quarter. Yeah, I just want to add another way to look at this as well. I understand this is of your interest, of course. If you take a look at the last 10 years in Bravida, we have actually an average on cash conversion at, I think it's 99% or 98%, even if we include this quarter. I think if you isolate one quarter, then, of course, we can have these differences. I think we had the same in 2019 or something. In 2020, we had 135%. As we see it in Bravida, some of the large projects are historically very profitable for us. That is because we are good at it. We are choosing them very carefully. It also means when we try to be front-loaded in our cash terms in a contract, it means that after a while, the customer actually wants to have something delivered for the money we actually invoiced them earlier. In this specific case, without mentioning the project, that is contractual terms that were decided when we were bidding for the project where we had a big invoice in the beginning. We have a middle phase where we are producing a lot, and we are invoicing slightly less. In the end, there are some testing where we have a big invoice where we have lower production as well. I think that is what you get as well in these types of projects. It is a timing thing in the contract. It's not the margin thing. We definitely have no dispute with the customer. I think that is what we can say. Take a look at the 10-year average cash conversion. We are very close to 100%, even if we, yeah, put this third quarter into that calculation. Yeah, I understand. I think given the kind of dynamics and that we are in the dark from the outside, I think it would be good for visibility if you can improve guidance on this topic a little bit going forward. We can take that in a separate discussion. Yeah. Appreciate. Thank you. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Oscar Rönnkvist from SEB. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, guys. Just a couple of questions for me. The first one is just on the market outlook. It seems like you shifted your comments a little bit from the Q2 report. I just wanted to hear your thoughts on the direction of travel. Is it just that you have pushed out your recovery expectations? Is there any difference in the Q2 communication? Thanks. No, but I think we get new information not every day, but quite every month at least. We also saw that the construction industry in Sweden actually kept the growth numbers for the industry, but they actually pushed them a couple of quarters forward. I think that is, of course, what we see as well. If you go back a year and a half, I think most of the people in the whole society or our industry said that the market will turn after Christmas 2024. It was after summer 2024. After last summer, it was in spring 2025. No one really wants to guess anymore. I think what we really have to focus on is what are we doing in this market, because the market is nothing we can do anything about. We can decide what to do in a challenging market. That is, continue to work with our cost side, be very focused on meeting a lot of customers, try to develop new services, and improve our way to deliver existing services. That's what we work really hard on every day. My ambition, our ambition, is to become an even better company when we enter the next phase of the cycle, as I said earlier. Of course, the communication is therefore changed since the last quarter. We also have some more information. I know everyone wants me to say that the market is improving and changing, but to be honest, we can't see it today. We see it's stable. We think we are a very strong company with many good people, but we are not magicians. We can see that the market has definitely been more stable today. It has stopped being worse. It is now leveled out. Hopefully, we can go up from this point. The quicker, the better, of course. The honest answer is that we can see a positive order intake. We can see an order backlog that is improved in some areas. We've seen increased activity in the tender phases, but we can't see it until this year that we are increasing the production. I think that is what is actually important. Perfect. Thank you. Just a small question on Finland. You talked about increasing margins. Obviously, the Q3 margin wasn't that appealing at 0.6%. First of all, do you have any sort of comment about the magnitude of the project write-downs? Also, when you say that the margin should improve, is that from an adjusted basis, not including the one-offs from your side? Or is it just saying that it should improve from 0.6%? Yeah, but if I start then, Petra, if I miss something you want to add, you can do that. I think first, it is an isolated problem. While Finland is quite small in a tough market, we really can't stand these mistakes that we have done in one certain branch. We are now fixing that. Improving the margin going ahead means that we will have a better margin in Q4 compared to Q3, obviously. If I remember correctly, I think we had a quite good Q4 last year in Finland. I don't think we will meet that one, but it will be better and better. The good thing in our business model is, of course, when we have finalized those projects with the write-down writings, then they are gone, and then we have a healthier portfolio immediately. Was I right, Petra? Absolutely. You're absolutely correct there. Maybe I should also add that Finland, to your point, is such a small market. The write-downs of two projects that would maybe not even surface in a bigger market are impacting the EBITDA margin quite significantly in Finland. It's double digits on the millions, but it's not a huge number in the context of Bravida. Understood. Thank you very much. Thank you. There are no more questions at this time. I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments. Thank you so much for all questions. We know that it is a very busy day in the stock market today in Sweden. A lot of companies are reporting, which I think is why we have slightly fewer questions today. Thank you for participating. We will go back to continue to improve Bravida while we are waiting for a slightly better market. Thank you all. Thank you, everybody.