Welcome to Bambuser Q1 Report 2023. For the first part of the conference call, the participants will be in listen-only mode. During the questions and answer session, participants are able to ask questions by dialing star five on their telephone keypad. I will hand the conference over to the speakers, CEO Maryam Ghahremani and Chief Strategy Officer and Acting CFO, Jonas Lagerström. Good morning and welcome to Bambuser Q1 2023 report. I am Maryam Ghahremani, the CEO, and I will hold this presentation together with Acting CFO, Jonas Lagerström. Today's agenda will cover a short company introduction for people new to Bambuser. We will move over to Q4 highlights and finish off with SaaS KPIs and financials. Bambuser is the world's leading video commerce company. We were founded in 2007 by offering a video technology that lets users stream live video from their mobile phones. We pivoted into video commerce at the end of 2019 and have since then attracted over 350 brands across 45 countries. We have a global presence in New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Turku, and Stockholm, where we have our HQ. We have since the start delivered a strong ARR momentum. For this quarter, we faced some headwind due to weaker macro, churn, and delay in deal closing as we are in conversations with more enterprise customers who typically have a more complex procurement process. The world is changing, it's changing fast. Today, most e-com sites are static, meaning that they only have text and images to describe the products. However, we are all interactive more and more with video today. I'm sure that in the last 24 hours you have already consumed some sort of video with FaceTime, Zoom, YouTube, or any other services. These consumer trends will turn into business, it is only a matter of time before video becomes standard in e-commerce. The evolution to video is unstoppable. Bambuser offers a shopping experience that taps into today's consumer behavior around video. With Bambuser, our merchants can 10x their conversion, repurpose the content by using snippets from the shows in social media, on product landing pages, or even use existing videos and make them shoppable. The customers are making more informed purchases, and as a result of that, we see decreased returns among our customers. Video commerce is the future and something that has a significant presence in China. The western part of the world is 5-7 years behind China, where we note a massive GMV growth and general adaption. We have assessed the market opportunity and estimated that the global total addressable market is over SEK 250 billion and growing. The market is wide open with low penetration. Our core market opportunity is estimated to be over SEK 9 billion. It consists of larger companies being present in the regions and verticals we currently serve. Bambuser is the leading SaaS company in the video commerce space and well-positioned as demand grows. Our product suite consists of 2 products. One-to-Many is our flagship product and stands for over 90% of our ARR. This is the solution when one of multiple hosts is interacting with many viewers. It is very easy to get started. You can basically start from your smartphone or use external cameras. The viewers can interact through chat and send likes during the show. The One-to-Many solution has a full product promotion and add to cart functionality. One of our core strengths is that we use the merchant's native checkout. This is important as the checkout is very often the most important step in the customer buying journey that the merchants have spent most time iterating in order to achieve the highest conversion. One-to-Many integrates seamlessly with the customer journey. Our solution is also platform agnostic, meaning that we can work with more or less all e-com platforms such as Salesforce, Commerce Cloud, Shopify, or Magento, to name a few. Our other product is One-to-One. This is our solution that allows the merchants to have a face-to-face conversation between the end consumer and the brand representative, either in the form of a drop-in or a scheduled meeting. Our solution is very strong in verticals such as beauty and consumer electronics. We also see demand in verticals that have complex purchase journeys, such as automotive and luxury. Our One-to-One solution has an interactive shopping layer that integrates with the merchant's native add to cart function and checkout. We also have integration to several booking and CRM systems. Bambuser is present across the globe with over 350 paying customers, and we're proud to have some of the best-in-class merchants and partners using our video commerce platform globally. Now please let me walk you through some Q1 highlights. We successfully acquired new customers such as Sonos and CYBEX, and renewed and expand customers such as KORRES, NET-A-PORTER, and DICK'S Sporting Goods. We launched our own booking system for One-to-One, which was a feature that our customers had to have with another service provider before. It is still possible for our customers to integrate their preferred booking system with our platform, but the fact that we now offer our own booking system really sharpens our offering. A booked One-to-One call has an average duration of 50 minutes, and the average order value is +65% versus unassisted e-commerce sales. We are proud to welcome Sonos as a customer. Sonos is a perfect example of our ideal customer profile, the kind of customer we are pursuing. This was a lead through our Salesforce partnership channel, and we're excited to see what other opportunities our partnership channels will present. We released our One-to-Many SDK that allows our customers to integrate our technology into their own consumer-facing apps. Our customers can now offer their end consumers a customized journey with full control. This is a product that our customers have asked us to offer, and it creates a strong stickiness as we integrate quite deep into our customers' tech stack. With that, I'm now leaving over to our acting CFO, Jonas Lagerström. Good morning. I will now guide you through the SaaS KPIs and financials. We have restated our ARR as we have updated our ARR definition to include discounts. We will therefore use this updated ARR definition when we communicate ARR going forward. I would also like to remind you that we start account for ARR when a license period begins, and we post the ARR as churn when the license period ends, even if we are in discussion with the customer about renewals. If the customer comes back at any time after the churn, we will post it as new business. The ARR growth was 26% year-over-year at constant exchange rates. The quarter-over-quarter growth was flat, and it was challenging quarter with a weaker macro that delayed several new business discussions, and we were also impacted by churn in the quarter. In May, I represented over 60% of the new business. We also saw strong growth in APAC. We're not satisfied with the growth, notice that the customer churning have a lower average ARR profile than the group average. We are working to refine our ideal customer profile to onboard customers with better retention opportunity also setting up tactics to reach that customer group as effective as possible. We are introducing a new pricing model in Q2 that would allow the customers to grow with us as they increase adoption of our video commerce platform. We're also refining our time to value customer journey, our customers get as much value as possible from our platform in the shortest amount of time. Our net revenue retention improved slightly quarter-over-quarter for all accounts will remain strong in our enterprise segment. The somewhat weaker quarter-over-quarter NRR amongst the enterprise and top 20 accounts come from that we have been very successful upselling our current enterprise accounts in the past 12 months. Excuse me. For a good portion of the enterprise accounts, our current pricing model limits us to grow at the same rate this quarter. As mentioned earlier, we are introducing a new pricing model that would allow us to continue grow our accounts over time as they increase adoption and get customer value. The number of customer groups declined quarter-over-quarter due to churn as already been addressed. We see a 5% growth year-over-year, and we are pleased to see that the average ARR by customer group continues to grow with 30% year-over-year. We see this as evidence that our focus on enterprise accounts is paying off. Let's move on to ARR by region. APAC demonstrated high growth and now represents 13% of the total ARR. Beauty and electronics were strong verticals. Our move on more mature markets, Americas and EMEA, did not see the same growth, but it was still successful in growing verticals such as fashion and home and garden for EMEA and accessories and jewelry for Americas. EMEA remains as the largest region with 51%. If we look at the product mix, it is similar to the previous quarter. One-to-One has taken approximately 1 additional% of the total ARR share with strong growth in APAC and Americas. One-to-Many saw growth in all regions led by APAC in percentage growth. However, Americas and EMEA accounted for the growth in monetary terms. We are pleased to introduce a function-based income statement this quarter. We are, as of now, breaking out the expenses by function, namely S&M, R&D, and G&A. This also means that we are presenting a gross margin that reflects our business model. We believe that this will give better transparency and improve benchmarking with other listed SaaS companies. If we look at the net sales development, it grew 1% year-over-year, mainly impacted by weaker professional services. As mentioned in previous reports, we are focusing on our professional services around our SaaS offering. Hence, it is expected to see a decline year-over-year until the transition is completed. Most important is that we are growing our SaaS net sales with 25% year-over-year. The SaaS gross margin improved 10 percentage points year-over-year. The margin improvement was driven by better scale of our fixed costs. The gross margin for professional services is equivalent to adjusted EBITDA margin, meaning that we recognize typical OpEx costs such as staff costs, assignment costs, subcontractors, but not amortization and depreciation as cost of revenue. Excuse me, 3 percentage point improvement year-over-year for the professional services. For the adjusted EBITDA, we noticed a small decline quarter-over-quarter due to increased spending in marketing and IT and due to weaker net sales from professional services. Most importantly, the underlying trend is positive and we improved adjusted EBITDA margin with SEK 30 million year-over-year. We continued our initiatives to become leaner and more efficient as an organization. We're continuing this work in Q2 by reallocating capital where it truly moves our business forward in terms of improved ARR and free cash flow. Let's finish with the cash flow. We noticed a similar trend in the free cash flow as with adjusted EBITDA. This quarter was a bit affected by negative working capital. We see the same underlying trend that points in the direction of our positive cash flow target. Our cash balance was SEK 348 million, which we consider sufficient, taking us to positive cash flow. Thank you for listening. We are now moving on to the Q&A session where we are ready to answer your questions. Thank you. If you wish to ask a question, please dial star five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial star five again on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial star five on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Erik Åfors from CapeView Capital. Please go ahead. Hello. Thanks for your hard work for shareholders, first of all. I have a few questions, if you don't mind. I wanted to start with asking about the various pieces of the ARR puzzle. Perhaps we can start with the new business. New business was a bit weak. You mentioned macro, weakening consumer sentiment and so on. Probably also seasonality. Q1 is not where you strike the biggest new contracts. How do you see the pipeline for the rest of the year? It would be interesting to understand what you're seeing there in terms of new business prospects for the rest of the year. Thank you. We are a bit reluctant to give you any forecast at this stage. What we do see is that we are working hard to build that enterprise pipeline, which is something that obviously takes slightly more time than working with more SME accounts. We have a quite positive view in general terms. We also, as we said in the report, we believe that the closings may have some volatility because these enterprise accounts are a bit unreliable when exactly we can close them. Sometimes you have very long discussions with them. It can take 6, 9, even 12 months before we can close those accounts. That's why we also want to be quite frank in that there will be some volatility between the quarters. In general terms, I would say that the enterprise pipeline is being built up and we see positive going forward. That's very helpful. I wasn't looking for an exact number, just a little bit of understanding how it looks. Thank you. Maybe moving on to churn. Churn has been relatively high in Q4 and Q1. I think you lost about SEK 25 million of ARR if you add up the two quarters. Presumably, it's related to sort of customers you took in during COVID when everyone was excited about this, and not all clients unfortunately invested enough in everything around it to make it work. My question is really, if we look at the ARR, the book you have today of the SEK 140 million left, do you have any sense how much left there could be that could churn that isn't really using the product or have invested enough in live video shopping? That would be interesting to understand. Thank you for the question. I think that is also numbers that we don't give any forecast on. I think what we see in the churn, and of course, we're not satisfied with the churn, is that there, as you yourself, you said, it's a lot of customers that jumped into this during COVID. Also with the macro, we see there is a lot of retailers undergoing quite tough challenges today. I think we see a lot of SMEs that are churning. I would say in those numbers, we really don't see any of the ICP clients. Once again, we're really looking for enterprise clients and moving away from the SMEs, which I would say is mostly the part of the chunk churn we see. I would say there is two reasons for churn. One is due to lack of internal resources. We know all companies are, you know, letting go of people, and they're not investing in a lot in new technologies or adding, you know, more FDs. I think that is the first one. And the second one is that they have a hard time adapting. I mean, this is a new way of working, and I think adaptation takes time. I think those are the two main reasons we see. That's helpful. Thank you. And maybe the last piece of the puzzle, the downselling, I think you changed the name, and I forgot what it is now, but that, kind of, like-for-like sales to existing client base, hasn't really generated so much extra ARR growth. I looked over the last 12 months to take out any quarter volatility, added 8, 9 million SEK to ARR. Given the client base you have, you know, LVMH, you have a large furniture retailer, et cetera, et cetera. I would have thought that the rollout within these accounts would have generated more upselling over time. How should we think about upselling going forward? Is there anything I'm missing in my logics there in terms of what's going on within that piece? Excuse me. No, I think that's a very valid question. I think it's important to understand where we come from. Our current business model is license-based, and we mainly charge the customer by market. If you take a global company that is quite perfect for our current pricing model because they have multiple markets, we can basically grow by market with them. There is a sort of ARR ceiling on each market because it's more of a fixed license fee. What we have done now or are doing right now is that we, in this quarter, Q2, we are implementing a new pricing model that we can talk more about next quarter. In an essence, it's more usage-based. It's more based how they utilize and work and use our product. It will also. That means that if you are a customer that have multiple markets or only one market, we have the opportunity to grow with them because then we can land a customer, and perhaps we would land them slightly lower in AR terms, but we have the opportunity to grow with them over time and by that also grow the AR. This should over time be great for AR growth and of course NR metrics. And we also believe it will be better for retention because that means that we may not go in so high with certain accounts before we have proven our value to them. We can sort of tie that ARR growth with the improved value to the customer. Going back to why have we not expanded so much? Well, that is because for the last 12 months, actually, we did expand really well. This quarter, we sort of hit a kind of a ceiling with some of our accounts, where we had kind of outgrown their geographical markets. That's why we see a little less appealing expansion this quarter. I hope that explains. That's very helpful. Thank you. Moving on to the cost side. You, your headcount was down, I think, 168 now. It's sort of down, I think around 25% from the peak in Q2 last year to 26 people. You reduced it quite meaningfully during this quarter. If you could just help us understand, how do you think about the headcount from now, you're 168, for the rest of the year? Just, you know, directionally, do you think it will go up from here, be relatively flat from here, or could it go down further? Just to understand the trend. I would say the trend is going towards that, like all other tech companies, we are going down in headcounts as we, you know, want to use and invest our cash in a more sufficient way. Yeah, that's where we're looking at. I would say rather down than up. We're really focused on talent density. I think there will be some replacements in areas where we need to grow and in areas where there are less focus in the company right now. I can also just add to that I think it's important to recognize that the company has been in this new space since the pivot for roughly 3 years now. That may represent perhaps 10 years for any other company. That we have to sort of change the sort of pool of talent depending on which phase we are in the journey. Right now, we are looking into moving more into our marketing team, and it's also important for us to deploy more cash into marketing and demand gen also as the market, you know, is more competitive. That's what we mean with when we want to reallocate cash. We rather don't really stick to a specific headcount because we think that is perhaps the wrong way of measuring it. It's more about the general cash allocation, how we redeploy that to attract best growth and on the long-term cash flow. I understand. That's helpful. Maybe tying it a little bit to costs. I look at sort of absolute costs between adjusted EBITDA and sales, so as a total mass, cost mass of the company. It was SEK 95 million in Q one and Q two of last year, then it sort of dropped, and it's been SEK 80 million-SEK 86 million in the last three quarters, relatively stable. Given that headcounts fell in Q one and you talk about rather down than up headcount, is it fair to assume that that total cost base will, if anything, come down further? Is there anything I'm missing there when I add it up? I think we are. It's reasonable to say that there will be a more efficient cost base, that must not necessarily mean in absolute numbers. It's rather that we can redeploy that cash to fuel better growth. Even though we are incredibly concerned and cautious with the cash and we have our eyes on the cost base, we also understand that we need to spend to grow. You could expect a more, how should I put it, attractive OPEX rather to net sales in the long term, I would say. I hope that sort of gives an indication of how we wanna sort of run the business going forward. That's very helpful. My last question is more big picture strategic after all these number related questions. Given it's a kind of fast changing market and you, and you said three years for you is probably 10 years for any other company, and you have to be agile, if you could help us understand what do you see changing in the market and how you play in the market going forward. It seems to me like you're, you know, there's a bit more general video focus in terms of your product focus, and then in terms of how you sell the product, a little bit more channel focus. If you could just elaborate a little bit and help us understand how it's changing your business model, that'd be helpful, I think. I can start a bit. We released a live video shopping product 3 years ago. I would say that today we're selling more of a video commerce platform to our customers, where video is shoppable and interactive video is in the focus rather than the live video shopping part of it. I mean, of course, it's a big part of what we sell, so I think in a strategic way it has moved a lot the past 3 years. We cannot forget that we have 2 products. Strategically, we see a huge potential in the One-to-One. Once again, it's only 7% of our ARR today, and we see that one being a strong contributor to growth going forward as our focus has been the One-to-Many product and not the One-to-One. Not going very much ahead of time, but I think more and more we are seeing ourselves as a partner to our customers when it comes to really being ahead of the curve when it comes to innovation to commerce and also how you connect phygital and digital stores, like how do you really make that connection, which I would say both One-to-One and One-to-Many is a great example of with many of our customers where really they use the products to really build that phygital experience that we're talking about today. I think a very different, a very different how to say, product suite we're selling rather than a feature, and market changing very fast. I don't know if you wanna add something to that. No, I think that's very good point. I think what we also see is that, you know, how our customers can utilize the outcome from the shows that they're producing on our platform and use that in other areas and really try to help them repurpose that content, whether it's in different Facebook ads or other advertisements or to use them as a part of the product landing pages, but also how we can help customers make existing videos, shoppable, that did not intend from the beginning have the purpose of being a shoppable video. These are all capabilities that we have had for some time in our platform, but as adoption grows amongst the customers and in-interest grows, this is something that we see will start to generate more actual value to our customers. I also think that that will give us a wider customer base and adoption in general going forward. That's also one of the main reasons why we wanna refrain from using the word live, because live is such a small part of this ecosystem that we are building. So we think video commerce is a more suited description of the space. That's very helpful. That's all the questions I had. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. There are no more questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any questions from the web. We have a question from Frans Höggren, from Pareto Securities. Where are you seeing the most ARR growth potential install base new customer groups? I think we see a mix of existing customers. As I just said, we have 350 customers. Of those, there are very few that are using the One-to-One product, so we see a huge upsell opportunity amongst the existing customers for One-to-One, and we're very focused on that product for this year. I believe that that one will grow. Once again, we're focusing on the customers we have, where we can grow. Of course, new customer groups we're looking into adding, we have identified a very strong ICP, and as you see in the numbers, we are strong in the enterprise segment. Then there was a question on what are our typical deal cycles now in terms of months. I would say also due to macro and how retail is looking, I mean, the deal cycles are a bit longer than what they were a year ago. I would say if you, if you take an enterprise client, we've been talking about this before also, we see it can go, I mean, I would say between 6 to 12 months, and sometimes it's even longer than 12 months, depending on the RFP cycle. I would say typical deal cycle, 6 to 12 months. That is what we see today. I can also just add to where we see the most ARR growth potential, that we are now seriously exploring the partnership channel opportunity. As you know, we have Salesforce as a partner that we have spoken quite frequently about. They have an excellent customer base that fits perfectly into our customer profile. However, we are also obviously exploring other partnerships that we expect to be announced in the near future that we believe will also supercharge the growth opportunities. That was all questions from the web. Thank you for listening in, and have a good day. Thank you.