Welcome, and thank you for joining us on the Q4 conference call for Cloetta. My name is Nathalie Redmo, and I'm Head of Investor Relations. I'm here today with Henri de Sauvage Nolting, CEO of Cloetta, and Frans Rydén, CFO. Henri and Frans will take you through our fourth quarter and year-end results, and we will then move on to a Q&A session. I will now hand over to Henri. Thank you, Nathalie. If we look at the quarter four results, I would say it is all best described by strong sales and an improved profitability while the circumstances were challenging. It's very good to see that we now are back to eight quarters of growth on the branded business. Remember that before the pandemic, we left it at eight quarters of growth, and Frans will show you a bit how that is being put in perspective. A lot of the growth, of course, coming from pricing, which is a general theme. Also pick and mix seven quarters of volume growth and profitability despite the higher input cost. We do see the input cost rising, and we have been able to offset that in quarter four, primarily through pricing and good cost control. Further pricing will gradually become effective throughout quarter one 2023, given the continued inflation. The inflation, of course, is starting to change a bit in nature because we now also see that our raw material suppliers are pricing in their energy cost and labor and transportation cost. It's not purely only the raw material itself which is going up. Of course, we see our cost going up as well. The Greenfield facility project proceeded. The union process is partially still ongoing. We also delivered a strong cash flow and a net debt over EBITDA, which remained well below the targeted 2.5, actually very low. That's something which Frans can talk about. The board is proposing a dividend of one SEK per share to the AGM. With that said, Frans, can you take us into a few more details? Yes, thank you. As usual, I will start with the net sales, where we are then for the 7th consecutive quarter reporting organic growth for the total company. This quarter is just shy of double digits at 9.5%, and including currency upside, sales increased by 14.6%. I want to call out already at that point, something to help you understand this currency effect on our reported results. There are three pieces. First, it helps our reported top line, as I just mentioned. Secondly, you will see that in the presentation, there is actually only limited upside at the operating profit level. The gross profit upside is largely offset by the translation of costs that we have incurred in Europe to Swedish kronors on sales, general and administration, which makes it look as if those costs are up when they're actually not up. Thirdly, while the operating profit is not significantly affected, the Forex does affect net financial items through revaluation of cash in our cash pool, and thereby also the net profit. That impact is non-cash and it's unrealized. The suppression of the net profit is also non-cash and unrealized. Importantly, it doesn't affect our ability to pay the dividends that Henri mentioned, and I will come back to this. Starting with the sales though, they are again driven by both branded package products growing at just over 6% and pick and mix growing at 21%. We'll look at that in more detail. Starting with the branded packaged on the top row. That's for three quarters of our sales, and this is the eighth quarter of growth, as Henri mentioned. We are now matching our pre-pandemic record of eight consecutive quarters of growth. At 6.1% growth, that is a little bit less than what we had in quarter three. If you scan across, you can see that in this quarter, we are meeting a much tougher competitor as Q4 2021 was up over 9% as we were still growing very strongly after the pandemic. I also want to comment on the volumes. As you know, we have stepped away from some volumes where customers have not been willing to meet us on the need for pricing, that remains a bit of a factor in the quarter. We're also seeing a hopeful mix in branded, where Pastilles and gum volumes are growing faster than the rest of the branded and faster than what it did in quarter three and in quarter three year to date. On the lower half of the slide for pick & mix, growing at 25%, that is the seventh quarter of consecutive growth and comes on top of the solid 32% growth we had in quarter four in 2021. The sales growth is again underpinned by both pricing and volume. Let's look at the profitability. On the operating profit, we have again this quarter been able to manage the rising input cost, we have offset that through strong pricing and other activities to keep costs down. Adjusted operating profit is growing faster than our organic sales with or without the Forex upside. We are delivering a step up in operating profit margin versus quarter four last year. On a full-year basis, our operating profit margin is also up versus last year and just above 10%. That is despite the compression effect of the higher pricing that we have discussed in prior quarters. I also think as we look at Q4 and the full-year here, it's fair to say that we've done what we said that we would do, which was to offset the input cost during the year, leveraging all the tools to our disposal. That said, Henri mentioned this, input costs have also continued to go up. While you may not always see it in the market data, surely everyone can see it, you know, when they check their own prices. Basically, energy is up. Everyone has felt that. Labor costs are also going up, largely due to those earlier increases. This is now affecting much more our suppliers conversion cost. As a result, we have announced further pricing, which has and will gradually become effective during quarter one. I can also confirm that what we shared in Q3, which is that we have increased our investment behind our brands this quarter, although not to the level that we did in quarter four last year. While marketing spend is down year-over-year, we have spent more in this quarter than we did in any of the three preceding quarters. Looking at the segments side by side here, with the branded package segment on the top. Absolute profit is up, and so is the margin, both for the quarter and the full-year. Again, this is driven by pricing. There's a favorable mix with the gum and pencils that I mentioned doing better than the average. The marketer spend increase not reaching last year's level. Excluding the lower marketing, absolute profit is still up, whereas the reported margin percent would be more similar to last year. Also taking into account the compression effect on the margin from the high pricing, we're doing quite well. Now for pick & mix, you do not see the same development in the quarter as you do in the full-year. Here it makes sense to recall that this quarter is the seventh consecutive quarter for pick & mix, where we have also stayed in profit, not just grown, but stayed in profit. That is despite the very high increased input costs. A few years ago, that would probably not have been possible. I'd like to think of this as the hard work on building profitability is evident from the ability to avoid making a loss in the current environment rather than seeing it as a stagnation on the journey or that we are not focusing enough on this. I would also say that, of course, this is not where we want to be. We actually have a slide here just to zoom in a little bit close on pick and mix and the end that we have expressed to reach 5%-7% of adjusted operating profit for this segment and what we will continue to work towards. When we started this journey, on the very left, we were making about 1%-2% EBIT margin for pick and mix despite a SEK 60 million loss in Swedish kronors we were making in Sweden. The other countries pick and mix was compensating for that. We have previously shown that we brought Sweden back to break even. Interestingly, that alone would have been enough to bring the segment to about 5% EBIT margin and basically into the range that we are seeking. We're not talking about something that is impossible here. This is not quite chronological, but we've had two big hits. First, it was the volume losses due to COVID, and now we have the increased input cost. We have through pricing and other efforts, kept the margin above zero, as I mentioned, the last seven quarters, but not much more. I also want to mention that this result does include pick & mix having first absorbed its fair share of the common cost. The profit seen on this slide is not fully representative of the favorable contribution that we have from pick & mix. Nonetheless, given the contract structure of pick & mix, and I think I've shared this as well earlier, we have so far been able to manage the input cost increase partially through pricing and partially through other means. Meaning that, and here you should look at the striped arrows that should sort of be seen together, there is still an upside to come from having completed the pricing in full. The question would be, when will that happen? Given that there is a bit of a lag, that will happen when costs stop going up and we can catch up. In addition to that, we will continue to drive the margin enhancing initiatives. There are further volume gains to be had in addition to other levers. Of course, the reversal of the compression on the margins is very important. This explains our ambition. As mentioned, in a way, the key to get to mid-single digits was always turning around Sweden's losses. That has been done. For the rest of the business, it's more to rebuild to where we were and any upside on breakeven in Sweden then also becomes accretive. Moving on to sales, general, and admin. With the pricing raising the top line, there is of course a significant drop in the spend as a% of sales from 27% down towards 24%. That is despite the impact of the ForEx I mentioned initially. That's adding SEK 21 million to the reported SG&A. We should exclude a translation effect here. We are controlling costs, not only with respect to the marketing that I mentioned earlier, but also offsetting increased costs such as in merchandising, given the continued growing volumes or increased employee salaries when comparing year-over-year. On a full-year basis, there remains a, let's say, smallish 1% increase in SG&A. When you exclude Forex, that's about, you know, SEK 20 million here against SEK 1.6 billion spend. That's as marketing spend is held at similar levels, while all the other increases in salaries, merchandising, et cetera, we have been able to offset through cost savings. The earlier presented savings from our VIP + cost savings program, which has delivered about 1% EBIT net of reinvestment, is still holding. Looking then at cash. As is the case for our business, we tend to generate our cash in the back half of the year after investing in working capital in the first half. Q3 wasn't different, and Q4 is not different as presented today. Our discretionary free cash flow for the quarter was SEK 241 million. That accounts for most of the full-year free cash flow of SEK 305 million. Overall, cash flow holds to the normal seasonal patterns with the year ending with low receivables after the festive season. Also lower inventories and lower payables. What is of course still affecting us in all three is pricing and higher input costs. On the same number of cash conversion cycle, it ties up more working capital, so the result is despite that. On CapEx, the spend is a bit lower than our normal run rate, but we do expect that on a full-year basis, the spend will be on average SEK 50 million-SEK 60 million per quarter in line with what we normally do, excluding spend on the greenfield, which wouldn't really materialize, at least not in the first half of the year. As we look at the cash, I also want to comment on, and returning to the point that I made at the very start, something you do not see in this cash flow bridge, and that is the effect of the very high net financial items in the quarter and for the full-year, for the simple reason that it's basically non-cash. For the net financial items and now looking at the full-year, that includes a negative SEK 143 million of unrealized exchange differences. That's a lot of negative and a lot more negative than what we've been before. I think the worst time prior was 2012 with about SEK 19 million. That's important to understand because our profit after taxes affects that, but not our ability to pay dividend. Which brings me to the last slide on net financial position. As we close the year, our net debt at SEK 1.9 billion is slightly up versus last year. If you take into account the revaluation impact, we're actually on par with last year, and our leverage is improved at 1.9x. It's down versus last year. Not only that, it's actually the first time since 2012, maybe even before then, since our net debt at year-end has been below two in terms of leverage. We're well below the 2.5 long-term target. As we close the quarter, our unutilized credit facilities and commercial papers and cash were at SEK 3.9 billion. That's more than last year. That's driven by the newly agreed financing for the greenfield, which we've also presented in more detail during the investor event earlier this fall, which is available on our website. Consequently, with our strong growth and improving operating profit as well as strong cash flow and solid financial position, the board has proposed a dividend of 1 krona per share in line with earlier expressed ambition. This is at the upper end or just above. They usually refer to 40%-60% of profit after tax, of course, excluding the Greenfield. Of course, that profit, and as I mentioned earlier, is very much suppressed by the non-cash unrealized revaluation effect on cash in our cash pool, and that does not reduce our ability to pay dividends. Before I hand back to Henri, I want to mention that in the presentation towards the back, we have also included a simple couple of slides bridging our reported number to our pro forma numbers excluding the Greenfield, and then bridging that to our adjusted operating profit as presented here. We provide this for the quarter and for the full-year. Of course, in the quarter, there's no material movements, but that way you have it in one place and in a simple-to-read format. With that, back to you, Henri. Good. Thank you, Frans. Quick strategic updates, and we always talk a lot about what is happening in our core markets and in Europe. Of course, as part of our strategy is also to expand on the international positions which Cloetta has for many years, and which we focused upon as from the new strategy implementation. Just to give you a feel of that, we're looking at growth levels of 15%, 14% on top of the existing business with a new team, with a focused agenda on the top five brands we already have in those markets. Then also focused on the regions, as we call them, you can see them on the right, where Cloetta is already present for many years. This is a clear growth strategy to contribute to the overall growth journey of Cloetta, and also to get more scale into our business through growth in those markets. Quite nice to see, and if we keep on doing this will be an important pillar under our business. The next is, I think a external complement, you could say, of the progress we've made within our pick and mix business that we are really able to claim now that we are the category captain in pick and mix. Customers coming to us, we can advise them on how to grow their business, on how to attract shoppers to that category, how to promote, how to activate, et cetera, et cetera. Why are we so confident to say that? Well, this is a piece of information from Norway. There are three customers over there, or three main customers. We are having our Candyking concept within REMA 1000. Here you can see a external piece of research which was published widely, what are the main categories shoppers go to these three retailers for. You can see in REMA, pick and mix from Candyking is on the number one place. That in itself is already very nice to see. You can also see that in the other two customers, their own pick and mix concepts are not even featuring in the top 10. This is really a piece of proof, I would say, that we now really know pick and mix can help our customers, like we do with brands, to grow their business and do that in a very professional way. As part of our CSR agenda, we're also looking at other areas than just the climate action. One thing which is really important is for the people part, the three legs of our CSR strategy. What you can see over here is that Cloetta is a very active part in the pledge on kids marketing. We already had that. We updated that. We actually go beyond some of the things we want to steer and we want to do. That is something which is, I think, important for a responsible company and also very good to see the enthusiasm and understanding of our commercial organizations that we do good business. Another one on the for you is the accidents we have in our factories. We want people who walk into our factory to work there for eight hours to also leave in a good, in a good way. There's a lot of focus on this. Our vision is to come to zero, and then a strange word, LTIR, that is lost time incidence rate. How many accidents do we have where people have to leave the factory to maybe seek a doctor's consult based on the number of hours. You can see that this gradually over the last couple of years has been going down. Of course, each accident is one too many. We work a lot with people in particular on the safety structure and how to train people to always think safety before they act when they make changes to machines or when they are starting up, et cetera, et cetera. Really important for us. Safety first is an important message for our people. A bit of an update from a different angle in the CSR journey, that means that we can now open up for questions. I'll give it back to the operator to manage that. We will now be beginning a question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touch-tone telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the queue, you may press star and two. Participants are registered to use only headsets while asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. We have a question on the web. Could you please comment on overall branded segment volume development versus the 6.1% organic growth? Was volume positive in index terms? Where are we on branded product volume relative to pre-pandemic, i.e., quarter four, 2019? Overall, I would say that we've seen in the quarter, as Frans said, that in some categories like pick and mix, we see strong volume growth. We're also very pleased to see the volume growth we had on both gum and the Pastilles business. We have good profitability over there. That is the category where we lost volume during the pandemic, so very important to bring that back. On overall on branded. We are just shy of having stable volumes that is mostly driven for now from some customers who did not want to buy our products at the new higher prices, and where we have been very firm that we say, "Well, you know, we are not in this, in this business to shift our profit to our customers," and that has had an impact. Have the exact relation to the pre-pandemic fronts, you have that. Well, I mean, I mean, the big view of this, of course, is that you also during the pandemic, we continued to grow. Mm. on the branded side. I mean, there was a bit of an effect just very initially. If you recall, the decline was not. You see that on the slide as well with quarterly growth. It was nowhere near what happened on the pick & mix side. We've continued to, you know, to basically to grow on the branded side. Actually, in totality, these two categories together, we are above where we were in 2019 on top line. Whereas the pick & mix volume-wise is still below. Part of it volume lost. Part of it's volume that we walked away from because we couldn't get the pricing through. Branded is doing well versus 2019. There's a second question. "Hi, can you discuss about competition from other players, please? Discussions also with big retailers, customers regarding price increases due to global inflation, price can increase with where's the limit? Update on the new facility." Other players is a little bit difficult to talk about. I mean, that you should ask them. I would say in FMCG, most companies are taking pricing since they're all faced with the same raw material input cost. We're now, of course, a year into this, more or less, and I would say that everybody is getting these effects even if you would have had some delayed effect. Of course, discussions with retailers, it is difficult. I mean, we are very open and transparent about showing them what our absolute price increases are on things like raw materials, energy, transport, et cetera. We seek compensation for the absolute level. I think we've got quite some praise that we do it in that way. That is good. Of course, there is some variation from market to market on how this is being done. As I said before, in some markets, there are customers who are not willing to pay the price, which is completely transparent and fair as we see. Then we walk away from that business, which I think is the only right thing to do in the current climate. Where is the limit? I mean, that is an, of course, a good, a good question. What we know from the past when we had the previous financial crisis, we could see that the confectionery category in general was not so much affected. Yeah, that is a good thing to see. We already see that right now that, given the fact that we have strong brands and also that we have been investing in those brands in the last couple of years, it also means that the consumer is willing to pay this higher price. I would not be able to have a very strong view on how that is going to look in the, in the future. That's so far so good. Of course, we see some channel shifts of shoppers going into cheaper channels, but that also fits with our strategy because we are present in the channels where the consumers are shopping. I think it's much more like we also said in the report, that we will try to adjust our offering to the consumers to also take this into account value packs or smaller purchase price packs is something we will do. An update on the new facility. I mean, that is going along. I mean, we're negotiating with the unions. We're talking to the government in the city where we have one of the options of the land to get the permits. All that work is on ongoing. Yeah, I guess on the question of also, you know, on CapEx. Of course, when we have details around that, we will share that. As we presented before, it's of course it doesn't come now in the first half of the year. We first have to get everything ready, and we have to contract as well with what we're gonna order, building, machinery, et cetera. There's of course no CapEx spend in the first half of the year at least. That will come more towards later on. Good. We have a next question. "You mentioned that cost inflation will continue during 2023 as your suppliers pass on energy and labor costs despite moderating raw material and freight. What is the magnitude of the cost inflation that you are preparing for in 2023?" That is of course a bit sensitive in the sense that that is a part of the discussions we have with our with our retailers, so it would not be wise to to share that. Of course, the impact continues even though as you also mentioned, some of the things, raw materials are maybe not going up as fast and freights may be becoming more benign in some areas. Let's not forget that also energy is being used to refine sugar or to produce carton. Of course, these costs are now also getting into the raw material or packaging material prices we are paying. I would say we have shown during 2022 that we can manage that we will price, and that will just continue in 2023 in the same way. Yeah, maybe just share a little bit more on this piece. Let's say why we don't want to give you a specific number on this. It's a little bit similar to that we don't want to give you exactly the price because how much the costs are increasing, it depends on what the products are that the customer is buying from us, and it depends also what was the price the last time we had the price increase because that also varies between the markets and the customers. If we give you a number which is average, then half of the customers will think they were overcharged and half of them thought they got away with it. It's basically I think the main point is it is a lot of cost increases, but we will continue to manage those as we have done in the last year. Good. I don't see any more questions on the screen. I think we come to the end of this call. Very efficient, I would say, in half an hour. Thank you very much and have a good weekend.