Thank you for joining us on the Q2 conference call for Cloetta. My name is Natalie Redmo, and I'm Head of Investor Relations. I'm here today with Henri de Sauvage-Nolting, CEO of Cloetta, and Frans Rydén, CFO. Henri and Frans will take you through our results for the Q2, and we will then move on to a Q&A session. I will now hand over to Henri. Thank you, Natalie. This is the normal agenda. We start with the quarterly update from me. What are the key messages? That we had a lot of growth, as I think we all expected, so high organic growth and also continued profit improvement that makes us proud of these results. Strong growth in the branded business of 14.8% organic and also a favorable mix from higher margin products. That's also quite important. Pick & Mix, having volume growth, which is really good, and on top of that, of course, 22.4% organic growth in total. Really positive to see. I'll show you a few initiatives we're doing on Pick & Mix when we come to the strategic update. The higher adjusted operating profit reflected last year, our pricing was only partially offsetting the cost inflation. Remember that we always have this lag in pricing after input costs are going up. Last year, we were lagging, now we are on top of that. That's quite an important one if you judge the results. We're also looking and executing a lot of things in the factories. One of the things is that we are stepping up the efforts in the portfolio rationalization. We were actually doing that before. We're doing this now faster, also to contribute to lower costs in order to compensate for our own internal costs, which are going up, and that is difficult to price through to the customer. We're taking out costs. We're also at the same time then creating capacity for further growth. On the greenfield project, I'll come a little bit more specific. The big last union negotiation outstanding in Belgium was finalized. Also, the city council in Roosendaal has published the intent to sell this piece of land to Cloetta. Net debt remains below our targets. Frans will also talk a bit more about the loan facilities, which are now extended in order to finance the greenfield project. Frans, if you elude a little bit more in detail on the financials. Yes, thank you. As Henri mentioned, we are again pleased to report strong double-digit organic net sales growth, 16.7%, and when including the effect of currencies, growth is 22.9%. It takes us the closest we have been to report SEK 2 billion in sales in a single quarter at really just shy at SEK 1,998 million. That milestone is still out there ahead of us, and let's see when we will get there. The 16.7% growth is a bit lower than the growth we reported in Q1, of course, as we progress in the year, we will face a tougher and tougher comparable given the ramp up that we had in pricing last year. I will come back to a couple of things more than once in this presentation. One of those is the strong organic growth in an environment where consumers are increasingly under pressure from rising inflation, our fair pricing to offset our own rising input costs, and also the stronger euros effect on our sales and the profit generated outside of Sweden and Norway, but also that it leads to challenge when materials for the Swedish and Norwegian markets are purchased outside. Firstly, though, I want to say, you've heard me say this before, unlike energy and food, et cetera, the consumer is completely free to decide if they want to buy our products or not. Despite the inflation environment, many are continuing to buy Cloetta products. We are, of course, very happy with this, but we're also proud because neither the customers or the customers, as in the consumers, accept higher prices by default, and that our products have this pricing power is the result of many years of effort to strengthen the quality of the product, the quality of our brands, and also the organization that actually carries out the work across functions and markets. Moving then over to net sales by segments and started with the branded package sales on the top. That accounts for close to 3/4 of our sales, and it's growing organically by 14.8%. This is the 10th quarter of growth, so we continue the streak post-pandemic, and we extend the lead of our pre-pandemic record of eight consecutive quarters of growth. This is also the highest sales we've had of branded packaged products since we started with segment reporting, and likely also before that, with the prior record actually being Q1 earlier this year. The growth, as mentioned, is driven by pricing, but also some favorable mix within the portfolio and between markets, including as we have ramped up, and Henri mentioned this, the effort on product portfolio rationalization to create space for more profitable and more strategic growth, as well as we've had to step away from sales when our fair pricing has not been accepted. Despite this, with respect to the branded package volume, I would argue, and I also did this in Q1, that our underlying branded package volume, and by that I mean the consumer's willingness to buy our product, are just about holding versus last year. Here I'm talking about volumes. If I, however, include volumes where we've had to walk away from when customers are not willing to accept our fair pricing, then our volumes for branded packaged products are down somewhat, and that is in line with the overall market. In the Pick & Mix segment, however, which is also growing top line, organically 22.4%, that is primarily driven by pricing, but there we also have volume growth, as Henri mentioned. Q2 2023 is now the ninth consecutive quarter of growth with profit in Pick & Mix. This is despite a tougher comparator than what we had in Q1, including as a result of that there is more Easter sales that happened in Q1 this year than what it was in the last year. Let's then move on to the profit. We are pleased to report a very strong quarter, where our pricing has offset the higher input costs in line with our stated ambition. On this slide, what really stands out is also that for the first time, can we see a net favorability comparing price versus cost? In 2022, we were lagging in our pricing versus the steep increase in cost, and now in Q2 2023, we have caught up. I've even added a small insert here from the presentation last year to sort of help illustrate this. At the same time, also since last year, we have shared that we would work on all the other tools at our disposal to manage the increase in costs, including premiumization, mix, efficiencies, cost control, and as such, the favorable balance of pricing net of cost in Q2 this year is a reflection of fair pricing next to the other efforts on our side. As we progress into the second half of 2023, I think it's also important to recall that we will meet then a stiffer and stiffer comparable as we ramped up and started to catch up on pricing last year, and also all these other offsetting actions were starting to take hold. You can also see here an unfavorability for volume and mix. That is correct, but the underlying volumes are pretty much holding, but with a decline due to our principled approach to fair pricing. You also have an unfavorable mix because the Pick & Mix segment is doing, from a volume point of view, better than the branded side. Now, while profit in SEK is improved compared to last year, we continue to see the effect of the compression from pricing with respect to the profit margin. Adjusted, it's just shy of double digit at 9.6%. However, as costs eventually start to come down, we will see an equal and opposite positive effect on our margins. Yes, energy costs have come down, but sugar costs are very high, and we also have a very negative currency effect in Sweden and Norway. We are not yet at a point where pricing should be lowered. Nonetheless, let's look at the two segments separately. The overall drivers are those that I mentioned, but it's clear here that the pricing is offsetting cost, and there's a strong improvement versus last year, given the lag in pricing during 2022. Also, similar to last quarter, the branded has a favorable mix, and Pick & Mix is growing in volume, although both are less accentuated now than in Q1, given the tougher comparator. Despite the growth in profit, the compression is very clear here and is holding branded package margins stable to last year. For Pick & Mix, it's actually slightly down. We have to also remember that this result is despite the increase in costs, and that's sort of the result of all of our efforts of building profitability in Pick & Mix. I don't want to see this as a stagnation, but rather as holding to what we've said. Moving on to Sales, General, and Admin. With the rising top line, there is a significant drop in spend as percent of sales from almost 26% to just below 23%. That's the same compression effect that we see on the profit margin. SG&A, excluding some minor items affecting comparability, is up. Half of that increase relates to the translation of costs incurred in euro to the Swedish result. The other half relate to salary inflation relating to our own workforce, but also those of suppliers of various services, where contracts are often indexed. We saw in the earlier bridge, we have been able to offset these costs. We will continue to work very hard on doing so. Looking at cash. Is the case for our business, we tend to generate our cash in the back half of the year after investing in working capital in the first half. Our Q2 free cash flow aligns to that at only SEK 2 million for the quarter, and slightly negative year to date. I'm pleased to report that that is nonetheless SEK 138 million better than in Q2 2022, despite the continued inflation of our input costs and our commensurate pricing. As you know, higher input cost per kilo does mean higher payable, but that savable impact on working capital is more than negated by the effects on inventory values and the higher receivables on account of the necessary higher price we have to charge. An improvement of the free cash flow versus last year, despite that effect, is quite good. The driver of the stronger working capital in the quarter is the improved focus on receivables, as we have increased the whole organization's effort in this area, but we're also helped by the timing of Easter. The improved free cash flow is also despite somewhat higher investment in property, plant, and equipment this quarter, where the increase relates to investment in folding boxes as used, for example, in Läkerol, which will allow us to harmonize packaging size and also reduce costs, as well as investment in new bag packaging to more fully utilize production capacity. There is also a couple of million SEK here related to capitalized engineering support for the technical design of the greenfield. But as previously shared, CapEx for the greenfield will not materially impact this year, but rather be initiated in 2024. On the matter of the greenfield, we have again provided the details on items affecting comparability in the report, and also in a, what I hope is a helpful bridge at the end of this presentation. Each quarter, we review the accounting for the Greenfield for any necessary updates, including on timing, with outcome, as is now on the finalized negotiations. Overall, we remain within the range of numbers previously communicated. Not reflected in the cash flow are the high net financial items in the quarter, given that similarly to quarter one, those are mostly unrealized exchange differences, which are not part of the operating cash flow, but they do form part of the exchange differences. Interestingly, had we closed the quarter yesterday with the current FX rate, we would have had a gain on net financial items, so SEK 80 million better than we have now correctly reported. Nonetheless, we didn't close yesterday, so they do have an effect, and that is also on the net financial position. That takes me to my last slide. I would argue that our financial position remains strong. We have strong growth, we have improved operating profits, we have better free cash flow, and we have access to additional credit facilities and commercial papers, plus cash on hand for SEK 3.6 billion. Our leverage is 2.3, which is below our long-term target of 2.5, and it is lower than our leverage in Q2 last year. It is higher than Q1 this year, including due to the effect of these unrealized exchange differences. I would also say it is primarily higher than Q1 on account of payment of SEK 1 per share dividend down during this quarter. On the positive note of paying dividend, over to you, Henri. Thank you, Frans. A few strategic updates on the areas where we're working, you know, the four areas we focus on. If we start with the first one, and we already talked about the portfolio harmonization, to get more out of our installed capacity and also focus on cost decreases and increased gross margins. You can see here, for example, in our branded business, 75% of Cloetta, that we're taking the number of consumer units, so that is SKU, stock keeping units and displays, we're taking that down. You can see that that journey already started in 2021. Low-hanging fruits first, but we keep on pushing that agenda. A number of items down of 17.5%, another 7.5% down. Also, when we have the new greenfield, there's even further possibilities when we bring everything together of the plants into one unit. How do we do that? Well, we're classifying our SKUs in ABCD. A are the really big ones, doing most of the turnover, and D are the small ones, where we then say goodbye. It's not only the SKUs, we're also working more integrated backwards. We look at recipes and raw materials. I think we shared that, like last year, the number of strawberry flavors we have, and also semi-finished, these are like the individual products going into our mixed bag. A lot of progress over here, really contributing to cost reductions. If we look at Pick & Mix, same kind of journey. You see 2019, that was just after the CandyKing acquisition. We have more than 1,000 active items. You can see that we aim to be somewhere north of 600. That's also a lot of cost and stock coming out of the system. We are taking decisions on the assortment for all the Pick & Mix countries, more and more centralized, of course, with input from the countries. Where we try then also to have items to be sold in multiple countries. We're also centralizing the buying, sitting them together with the assortment team to take better buying decisions. We are doing a lot over here as well in order to bring costs down to contribute to the EBIT margin of Pick & Mix. You can see again that we are really stepping up, not only in e-commerce, but also in quick commerce, that is quite logic, because when you look at quick commerce, where people expect to get a product between 20-30 minutes, it is in particular the impulse products, which are very attractive in that channels, from drinks to ice cream to chips, but also candy is a really big category with a much higher share in the channel than in e-commerce. Apart from our regular products, we're also now launching next to, for example, Tupla, we're launching CandyKing in foodora, a CandyKing pre-packed Pick & Mix. You can see that on the picture and off to a stellar start. Also very interesting channel for us to explore and also learn more about consumers shopping in these kind of q-commerce channels. We are stepping up our efforts in a bit of a guerrilla marketing way to bring the CandyKing brand more and more alive in all the markets where we are working. This is what you could say is the advertising for CandyKing. We do that without too much investments, because we know that we don't have the enormous amounts of money to support the brand, but still, we are working on that, get a lot of free media in social. Here you have a few examples of Elle, for example, talking about the kind of products we're bringing to the market, and we get a lot of consumer reactions and tractions from that. In a relatively cost-effective way, we are able to start really building the CandyKing brand. Then you can also see that with the approach we have taken, that these kind of buy and win themes, you can see here, one picture, we are implementing something across all the markets where we are active. Again, using our scale and bringing something of activation towards the customers and their shoppers, and that also is reflecting that more and more customers are coming towards us saying, "Hey, and we really see that you're the only one really doing something professional within Pick & Mix. We would like to switch to your CandyKing concept." That, of course, is a great tribute to all the work we are doing. On the greenfield, I think we've mentioned a few things. The last union negotiations in Belgium are finalized and signed, so that is also good for the people over there, that they now know how this is going to work out in the coming years. The City Council of Roosendaal, they have now published the intent to sell the piece of land, which you see here, within the red stripes, where we're going to build the new plant. That is ongoing. We've had another open day with all the people from the neighborhood in current plant and future plant to explain even more, you know, what is it to produce candy? How do we do that? What kind of things are you expecting when you live not in the neighborhood, but when you live somewhere further out of this industrial estate? Quite important. Electricity supply has been ordered. You need to do that well in advance in the Netherlands. After the summer, we will start with the next phase in the tendering process for the building. There's quite some interest of companies putting forward their intent to put in a quote. There's a quite strict process we will be following to look at that whole tendering, to see we get the best quality for the best price. The last phases are happening in the engineering design, so that is all the equipment which will go inside of the factory to get the last specifications ready based on the product portfolio. Also that tendering process can start. That was the last slide on the strategic update. That means we will now be opening for questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press Star and one on the touchtone telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press Star and two. Participants are requested to choose only hands as we're asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. The first question comes from the line of Niklas Kuman with Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Hello, good morning, everyone. Good morning. A couple of questions from my side. It sounds like the, I mean, input prices have stabilized, but the overall picture is more like, yeah, it remains flat rather than coming down. Meaning that, I guess, we shouldn't expect the gross margin to recover, perhaps at least for the next quarter, I mean, to reach flat, it will remain? Yeah. Remain negative. You're right. Yeah. We do see, of course, energy prices coming down, but there's also an important thing over there. I mean, when the newspapers are commenting about energy prices, of course, it's spot prices. That doesn't mean that when you have longer term energy supply, that you get these kind of prices, because we also need to be sure that in December or in January, we're able to produce. Of course, we see some positive effects from that, and there's of course, also negative effects, which is particularly the sugar price, which is historically now at a very high level. There is the currency, which we also see as a certain commodity, because we buy a lot of, so yeah, we buy a lot of raw materials in euros or US dollars, and we also produce in euros. When we look at the SEK and the NOK, but also the British pound, we see negative effects of that. I think your assumption is quite right. All right. If we then, I think, I mean, I think the input costs started to stabilize in Q4 in November. Maybe then early next year, the gross margin impact will be unchanged. Well, it's not completely because the sugar prices actually have been going up up till, I would say, May or so of this year. There are a few other ingredients which also have been going up. What is then going to happen next year? Yeah, that remains to be seen, right? I mean, that's I don't know, at least. Yeah. Have you then continued to hike prices, your prices, because of the higher sugar price? Yeah, if there is an in the combination of energy, you mentioned sugar prices and FX, you know, we do these quarterly calculations towards our customers in our fair pricing model, if there is a reason to raise, we raise. Yep. Very good. I mean, it seems to be working for now, very well. I think Q2 must have been record, even in absolute numbers. If the second question is on the net financial items section of the income statement, both now in Q1 and Q2, and you mentioned there would have been a massively different impact if you had closed the quarter today. What is the actual underlying interest costs or net effect of loans, if you will, that you have and that you expect to have quarterly ahead? Yeah, I have to give you a gold star here, Nicklas, because we saw that you figured out that it was SEK -12, and that's sort of how we look at it as well. If we include, you know, whatever realized interests and, you know, cash pool income, expenses, I mean, the net of the whole thing. Yeah, I would say SEK 12. Okay. great. good stuff. That was all for me. Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one on your telephone. Star followed by one. Good. We have Sorry. We have a question from Michel Keusch from Bellevue. Please go ahead, sir. Yes, hello. Just a quick question, actually, on the extension of the maturities. Maybe if you could just give a bit of background on, you know, maybe the reasons for this, and also if there are any cost implications of this extension of the maturities. No, no. Well, we do that on a, you know, regular basis. We don't have it set up where, you know, all our facility would expires at the same time. It's, you know, it's par for course, and we've done that at the same terms as we had previously. I think it's more of a point of saying that the banks obviously still have a lot of confidence in us, and they don't have a problem with extending our facilities. Mm-hmm. Okay, that's just a normal. Yeah. Basically pushing forward of the, of your portfolio's maturities. It's nothing related to the project itself, which is. No. Delays or things of that, and you want to match? No, no. That's it. Thanks for asking that. No, it's a bit of a correction. That's those are not the facilities that we entered into for the greenfield. Yes. Okay, I understand. Okay, very clear. Thank you. Good. We have a question from Stefan, from Nordea. Have the price increases with your customers become tougher? I would say yes, in general, of course, in this high inflation environment, everybody is being pushed from either raw material side or of course, from the general opinion and the public. We do believe in our fair pricing model, where we say, we raise 1 SEK for 1 SEK. If our input cost and raw materials are going up with 1 SEK, we also price up to our customers with 1 SEK. That we have been doing. That we keep on doing. That means that sometimes customers do not agree to that. Then we step away from that business, or we reduce that business. I think we have communicated that also before, that we have been doing that in certain markets. We can do that because, you know, as you know, we are quite well, filled capacity-wise in our factory network, so we can, fairly easily, I would say, we can substitute these volumes with other volumes. Sorry, can I just add to that as well? It's also because, I mean, the cost increases have been so severe over this period of time, that we really don't have a choice than to push our pricing as well out. Yeah. Because otherwise, I mean, we would make a huge loss on these products. It's not, we're not talking about small margins here. No. Do we expect to be able to continue to offset price increases? I would say, yes. We will just continue with our fair pricing model in the way we have been working with that. I don't see a reason why we should change that or whether we should not be successful with that. There's a question about one-offs related to the new factory, Frans? I mean, basically, we will have, you know, items affecting comparability relating to the new factory as we move along. Because there's, you know, there's a project team working on it. Those costs we want to keep separate for full transparency. What we will continue to do is not only report all the details, you know, in the actual report, but also in the presentation we're uploading. We're providing a very clear, easy to understand overview of this, to see what it is. Now, the spend that we have is within the numbers that we communicated originally, where we say that we have certain one-off costs initially, and then we have certain one-off gains at the end of this, when we also dispose off our existing, you know, property and land. We are within the budget that we communicated, so it's not an increase per se. Yeah. Good. Let's check if there's more questions? Once again, to ask a question from the telephone, please press star and one. We have no further questions from the telephone, sir. No? Good. We will close with a few remarks. I mean, a good quarter, a lot of growth, of course, primarily driven by pricing, but we can mix with volume. If we take some of the lost customer volumes out, even the branded part is very close to being stable, which is a big tribute, I would say, to all the stuff we have been doing in the last couple of years to strengthen our brands and to get consumers to like our products. We'll continue on that way. Of course, the step up this quarter in profit is also largely to what... To the comparator of last year, where we were lagging, so that we also need to be a bit more modest when we think going forwards about the kind of step ups. We are pleased with this quarter, and we'll continue executing the strategy we are executing for the last couple of years. Thank you very much!