Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Cloetta Earnings Report Q3 2023 Conference Call. I am George, the conference call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by Q&A session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Henri de Sauvage Nolting. Please go ahead. Good. Thank you, and welcome, everybody. In the room here, it's me and Frans Rydén, the CFO, and we will take you through the quarter three results. So if we go to the agenda, we have the quarterly update, the financials, and a few remarks on some strategic updates. And then, of course, we'll open for the Q&A. So another strong quarter for Cloetta. Very strong double-digit organic growth in the branded business. That is now 20 quarters of growth. Take that in the context of the 10 years without growth and only the 3 Corona quarters without growth. So that's really strong and giving us confidence for the future, even though a lot of the growth is driven by pricing. Then also, the Pick & Mix business is very strong double-digit organic growth, and even with the effects, which Frans will show you a bit more about our number one Pick & Mix customer in the U.K. going into administration, which had an effect both on the top and the bottom line in the quarter. If we then look at the profitability, we can see a higher adjusted operating profit in absolute sense, so that's really good. Primarily attributable to the pricing to mitigate the cost, but also our own cost control, and to really make sure that we're not raising more than needed to cover for things like raw materials, energy, transportation, and packaging. So we're offsetting the higher input cost, and that is a theme we've been talking about before and also the way we will keep on running this business going forwards. We're also taking the opportunity, also with all these supply chain improvements we are making, to really streamline and optimize our product portfolio and take out those kind of lines of business which are not giving enough EBIT or creating too much cost due to the complexities or really cleaning up parts in the portfolio where we think we can do better with. Then the greenfield project is progressing. It's a long process, and the permitting process will probably take more time, and we're coming back with an updated timeline to take that into account. Our Net debt/ EBITDA remains below our target of 2.5. So with that said, I would like to hand over to Frans. Thank you, Henri. So, as Henri mentioned, we are again pleased to report strong double-digit organic net sales growth, 12.2%. This is honestly terrific organic growth, and especially as now in quarter three, we are comparing ourselves to quarter three last year, when we had already started to catch up on the pricing. So even if the growth in the quarter is lower than the growth year-to-date, I would argue that this is a further step forward. So at net sales of SEK 2,148 million, it's also the highest that we've ever had in a quarter. Now, the sales continue to be aided by the translation of our foreign sales to the weaker Swedish krona, and including that translation effect, the sales grew 19.5%. Now, what you might find interesting, though, is that if you strip out the 7.3% effect of translation, the quarter would still be our Q1 with more than 2 billion SEK in sales. So that's a nice milestone, I think, 2 billion. Now, the effect of currencies will come back throughout this deck, but the key points are, firstly, a stronger euro helps when translating our foreign-made sales and foreign earned profits to the result in SEK. It also makes our SG&A look higher, of course. But secondly, as a result, we have also had a need to take more pricing, because if we didn't, the SEK we earn on selling those products in the Swedish markets wouldn't cover the EUR cost we incurred to produce the products in the first place. That's... It's also if they are produced in Sweden, because the raw material is often purchased in euros. The same thing applies also to Norway. Ultimately, though, offering the best value to the consumer is the basis for consumers accepting paying a higher price to our customers. And I've said this before, unlike energy and food, the consumer is completely free to decide if to buy our product or not. And despite the inflationary environment, many are continuing to buy Cloetta products, and we're proud of this and our own work to ensure that our brands have this pricing power and that our organization has the capability to execute that agenda. Looking then at net sales by segment. So the branded package sales, which accounts for three-quarters of our sales, grew organically by 10.9%, making it the 11th quarter of consecutive growth, and as Henri mentioned, the 20th quarter of growth since 2018. Similar to total sales, this quarter, we reported the highest sales we've had of branded packaged products since we started with segment reporting. The growth is driven by pricing, but also some favorable mix within the portfolio and between markets, including with the ramped-up effort on portfolio rationalization, as well as where we have stepped away from sales, where our fair pricing has not been accepted. With respect to the branded packaged volumes, I would argue, and I did this also earlier this year, that let's call it our underlying volumes, and by that I mean the consumer's willingness to buy our packaged products. That volume is just about holding versus last year. If I, however, include volumes where we have walked away, where customers are not willing to accept our fair pricing, then our volumes for branded packaged products are down, but actually not as much as the rest of the market. The Pick & Mix segment is also growing organically, 16.4%, and you see it on the lower half of the slide. This is primarily driven by pricing, and it's the 10th consecutive quarter of growth in Pick & Mix. This quarter, the profitability requires some unpeeling. Henri mentioned some of it, and I will come back to that. But Pick & Mix does have volume growth, and there's not many businesses that can claim that currently, so that is also very encouraging. Of course, it helps with absorption of cost throughout our supply chain, and that helps profit. So let's look at the profit. So we are pleased to report further strengthening of the profit, despite the one-time impact that Henri mentioned. Overall, profit is up SEK 20 million, and in there you can see a strong Forex translation effect, and then a slightly favorable net price effect. And that is the combination of pricing, efficiencies, and savings, less, of course, higher input cost, less the negative currency I mentioned, and then the net effect of the two one-timers we have in this quarter. So we're very pleased to have continued growth despite all of that. Now, with respect to the one-timers, we had a gain of SEK 12 million relating to an electricity grant, but that was more than offset by the impact of one of our biggest customers in the U.K. entering into administration, a customer named Wilko, if you were to look that up. As a result, we have taken a provision for the receivables outstanding with that customer. That's a total of SEK 24 million. In addition, the quarter three result is, of course, affected also by the lost profit on sales that we didn't end up having to Wilko, and that's almost a full quarter three. And that, of course, is not a one-time effect, but it will affect Q4 in a similar fashion. We are now working through the immediate and long-term effect of this change, and Henri will talk more about the U.K. business shortly. As for the volume and mix, it is slightly unfavorable, and that is both on account of volume stepped away from, but also because the mix between the two segments, where the faster growth in Pick & Mix, growing from a total point of view, overshadows that we do have a positive mix, both within the branded package sales, with pastilles and gum, holding on to volume better than average, and for a positive mix between countries in both the two segments. Now, while profit in Swedish kronors is improved compared to last year, we continue to see the effect of the compression from pricing with profit margin adjusted just shy of double digit at 9.7%. Now, we will, of course, see an equal and opposite effect, so a decompression of our margins when costs fully start to come down. Energy cost does have come down, but sugar cost and cocoa have gone even further up, and then the negative currency effect in Sweden and Norway that I mentioned. So we are not yet at the point where we are in a position to lower any pricing. But let's look at the two segments separately. So the drivers for the variance are really the same, although with a clear difference that the retailer who has gone into administration in the U.K. was primarily a customer of Pick & Mix. So almost all of that hit lands in the Pick & Mix segments. So to help you, we have broken out what the underlying performance is. If one thinks more in terms of if, if consumers like the product and customers are willing to pay for it, and then separately, what's the effect of the administration of Wilko? And based on that, we have done a nice step up in profit in the quarter. Now, despite the growth in profit, compression is also very clear here. It is holding branded package below last year, although the 13.3% in the quarter is an improvement versus year to date of 12.9%. The Pick & Mix margins, of course, are down, for that different reasons, but if you excluded the one-timer, it would have improved slightly despite the compression effect. Moving on to sales, general, and admin. So, as mentioned, the currency translation helps with top line and profit, but has the opposite effect when translating the cost incurred in euro-denominated countries to Swedish kronor. So SG&A, excluding currency and minor items affecting comparability, is up on account of salary inflation relating to our own workforce, which is only partially offset by our cost savings, and likewise, knock-on effects from inflation at suppliers, including where contracts are often indexed. As we saw in the earlier bridge, we are able to offset these costs together with all other input costs and with the much higher sales, there is again a drop in spend as% of sales, both in the quarter and even more year to date. Now, with respect to investment in our brands, we have ensured to keep investments during year to date 2023, quite close to what we did last year, including with a bit less spend now in Q3, followed by, and I can flag for that already now, followed by an expected significant step up in Q4. Q4 spend is planned to land around SEK 20 million-SEK 30 million, higher than Q3 spend, and that's similar to what we also did the last two years. So we strongly believe that love brands are the key to consumers' willingness to consume and customers' willingness to buy them at a fair price. I will also here comment on that there is no major movements in the items affecting comparability on account of an expected different timeline for the startup of the Greenfield, as the increase of restructuring provisions is largely offset by a reversal of the impaired production assets, given that we will use those assets for a longer period. Moving then to cash. As you probably recall, I mentioned that our cash flow would improve in the second half this year, as it generally does follow such seasonality, and the free cash delivery for the quarter is SEK 123 million, bringing the year-to-date free cash flow to SEK 102 million. In this over and under comparison to last year, it does appear that we are doing worse than last year, but then there was a bit of a catch-up effect in Q3 last year, and on a year-to-date basis, we are actually doing better in free cash flow by about SEK 38 million. That said, cash is not where we want it to be, and we have increased our efforts in managing working capital to help offset some of the effect of the inflation and pricing. And given that we pay our suppliers before we get paid by our customers, our high business growth inevitably means more cash tied up in working capital, and that is what you see impacting our free cash flow also this quarter. Now, the investment in CapEx was a bit higher than normal run rate, as we are installing new packaging equipment in the plant in Slovakia, and the spend also includes about SEK 5 million related to capitalized engineering support for the technical design of the Greenfield. As mentioned by Henri, given the regulatory process, we now expect to start the new plant later, and therefore also start major CapEx investments later in 2025 rather than in 2024, as previously communicated. On the back of the Greenfield, we have again provided the details on items affecting comparability in the report and a, what I hope is helpful bridge at the end of this presentation. Each quarter, we review the accounting for the Greenfield for any necessary updates, including now based on the revised estimate on timing. And for this quarter, as I mentioned, there is no major movement. Now, coming back to the estimated timeline. So, Henri will come back to this, but I still want to mention that we will still close one of the plants in Roosendaal in 2024, and we will selectively outsource volumes. This reduces the need for CapEx, and together with other improvements identified in the quite detailed work on the Greenfield, enables us to stay within the net investment shared previously, which was SEK 1.9 billion, even if the current higher interest rates would remain when spend starts in earnest. Today, we're not providing a full update on the business case, but given the high salary inflation in 2023, and based on the work to date, the incremental EBIT has improved within the range previously shared, which was SEK 220-260 million per annum. I also want to, as I did in Q2, spend a little bit time on the net financial items on this slide and the continued effect of the weak Swedish krona and the Norwegian krona. As before, you really can't tell from the cash flow since the net financial items in this quarter are mostly impacted by non-cash, unrealized exchange differences. In Q2, the exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents year to date were negative SEK 137 million, as we closed the quarter with very weak, both Swedish krona and Norwegian krona. And now in Q3, about half of that has reversed out, given the strengthening of both currencies, so a positive SEK 67 million effect. And while it's not impacting the cash flow, the strength in Swedish krona does impact revaluation of euro-denominated debt, and that in turn, helps net debt. So let's look at the net debt and the leverage. So this is my final slide. Our financial position remains strong despite the working capital and the effect of the higher input cost inflation and our offsetting pricing on that. We have strong growth, we have improved operating profit adjusted, we have improved free cash flow year to date, and we have access to additional credit facilities and commercial papers, plus cash on hand of SEK 3.7 billion. Our leverage of 2.0 is improved versus last quarter, and it is also the lowest we've had in a quarter three, ever, as far as I know. Now, it's in part because the strengthening of the Swedish krona and the effect of that on the revaluation, but also without that, the leverage would have been for yet another quarter, well below our long-term target of 2.5. On the positive note of the leverage of 2.0, back to you, Henri. Thank you, Frans. So a few items on our strategy. So if we go to the new factory, the regulatory process will take longer than anticipated. This is at the moment what we expect. Not 100% sure, but expect. So what has happened since then? There's a conditional purchase agreement for the land, and the agreement is such that if we are not getting the permit, there are no costs for us associated with that. So that is secured. The city council has started the permitting process review. There are certain legal steps which need to be taken to give everybody a chance to react on the proposal and the permit, which the government wants to grant to us. We think that we will get the permit in 2024, but a lot will depend on how this will develop in the next couple of months. That means that our major investments will happen during 2025 and not 2024, as previously communicated. And that would also mean that the plant will start operation during the second half of 2026. And of course, we'll keep you updated in the coming quarters when we have more clarity on the regulatory process. That's one. Then we looked at how can we make both the business case become better, the CapEx less, but also to get already some savings in, and that means that we will close the Borchwerf factory. That's the old Lonka factory from the acquisition from a number of years ago. We will close that plant in 2024, and through a mix of measures by insourcing into existing factories, outsourcing to third party, but also cleaning out some of the portfolio. We can do this, and it will have a positive effect on the total business and the business case, of course. Then we went through the first phase of the tendering process for all the buildings, utilities, roadworks, et cetera. So I call it the stuff which we are not doing that often ourselves in contrary to, let's say, buying new machines or processing equipment. And those inputs have been received and evaluated, and that's good to have that secured. With that information and all the other changes we've made to the program, we can see that the total investments remain within the budget, and the savings have even improved within the range of SEK 220-SEK 260 million. That's quite important because, of course, we have more capitalized interest in there. That means that what we have estimated and which we also communicated remains the budget and that we are secure that we will be able to deliver this project within the budget with more savings, but delayed, as communicated before. That's a quick update on the Greenfield. The next topic is the U.K. Of course, with Wilko as our number one Pick & Mix customer falling out, we did a strategic review on how to operate in the U.K. Just to give you a bit of a flavor, I mean, the U.K. candy and gum market is a GBP 2 billion market, so really big, 64 million people, profitable. If you look at Pick & Mix, Pick & Mix is only 1% of that total market. If you compare that to the Nordics, where the average is around 20%, there's a lot of growth opportunity for Pick & Mix in the U.K., but that will take time, of course. If you look at the portfolio we have, we have now 2 brands in the U.K. We've cleaned out also over there, many of the non-strategic brands and product lines we have. So we have the Jelly Bean Factory brand as one, and then the Chewits brand as the other leg we stand on in the branded business. Of course, both brands have been there a long time. Chewits, in particular, with a little bit of love and attention, we see fantastic growth figures in both of these brands, and that gives also a very good way forward to become a bigger company in the U.K. So what are we doing? There's new production lines coming in for Chewits, which are going to take the cost of production down quite significantly, which will be very positive. We have changed our whole go-to-market model in a way that we are going directly to the food retailers, so that we don't work with distributors anymore. And we see the volumes in The Jelly Bean Factory going up, which is also good for the profitability, and we've cleaned the portfolio. So quite important. And then within Candyking, we do have the effect of the Wilko stores. There are some 391 stores which are not selling Pick & Mix anymore. And it also means that our merchandising costs, of course, are going up for the remaining stores because there's a lot of fixed costs in there in driving to a store, sorry, driving to a city and then visiting three, three stores. So there's two major things we're doing. We are going out to all our customers at the moment to price for the fact that the merchandising costs per store are up. Yeah, and we're also executing a restructuring of our merchandising and field sales force and even some head office to adjust our indirect cost to the level of volume we now have within Pick & Mix. Then, of course, are the opportunities I already mentioned, so we can grow the volume per store. If we go from 1% to 2%, I mean, that would be already a doubling of the business, and we're also able to grow in the number of points of sale. So within particular high street, that is where Wilko was classified, we already see some of our existing customers taking over the Wilko stores and reaching out to us to get Pick & Mix into those stores. So, as from next year, I would say we are able to claw back part of that. And we see that as well when we look at the year-to-date growth in the other stores, and the non-Wilko stores, we see a growth of 14%. So we're confident that we will be able to mitigate the effect of Wilko going into administration. Yes, then we go to the next one. On CSR, I would say there's quite some stuff happening, and we do want to communicate a bit of an update on our vegan journey. Our commitment is that 90% of the candy portfolio will be vegan by 2030. At the moment, we're at 33%, and that is progressing quite, quite well. There's also a big consumer trend. It's also good for the Science Based Targets initiative if we go more into plant-based. So that is happening. Then only for people, we have committed ourselves to being much more clear on portion control, which you can see there on the right. We will implement that on all our candy packs in the period of 2024-2026, and we also make people aware on the kind of calories they are getting when they're eating our products. Yes, and then there's a few examples of what we're doing with brands. So our core brands, the most important ones we, we have, you can see that, executing them and strengthening them is really helping, helping us. So one is the Ahlgrens Bilar, a fantastic upgrade of the, of the packaging, making it more authentic, but also in a more modern way, with a sustainable packaging, with the PlantP ack on there as well, and then also a new communication package for Ahlgrens Bilar, which we're launching at the moment and also into Q4, and an immediate effect on our, our market share. So quite, quite nice, a very strong brand for us, and then growing in the market with some fantastic execution. And then we have two examples from Denmark and Norway. So we have the Skipper's Pipes, which is an iconic brand within Denmark, and this has been a project for at least three years to get mini pipes in the bag so that we can really get into new occasions, and not like buying it for yourself, but also able to share with family on the TV moment or whatever. And this product has been launched with such a tremendous force by the Danish team that, I mean, you cannot go into a store in Denmark and not seeing this. These products are basically coming on top of the current Skipper's Pipes range, and it's now, during the launch period, the number one product within candy in Denmark, and that's quite an achievement, I can tell you. Another example is Pops. I remember that we launched the Tupla Puffs last year in Finland. Had an enormous success, gaining a lot of new consumers and market shares, and that same product we've now launched under the Pops brand in Norway. Too early to show you the results, but I thought it was a very nice example of where you can really scale good innovations across several brands, because this product is existing and it's just a matter of the packaging and nothing more, and the Pops brand really can carry this product in a good way. And it's a lovely, lovely product, I would say. So with that said, we go to the Q&A, and you can either ask it here over the phone or on the web. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touch-tone telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use only handsets while asking a question. Anyone who has a question, may press star and one at this time. Our first question comes from the line of Nicklas, Nicklas Skogman from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Hello, good morning, everyone. Good morning. A couple of questions from me. If we start with Wilko, you shared the bad debt provision and the impact on the profits in the quarter. But you also alluded to that you now have basically no sales, but you still have a merchandising force, et cetera, et cetera, that is costing money. So I assume there was a sort of running cost impacting profits in this quarter as well. Now, you said you were going to restructure the sales force, and you are going to raise prices to the remaining retailers who carry Pick & Mix. But how should we think about the profit impact from Wilko in Q4 and then in the next couple of quarters? We think we can address this fairly quickly, but we will need quarter four to do this. So the pricing is out there, so I can say that already, and we are discussing this with all the Pick & Mix customers for exactly the same reasons as you just say. And then also the restructuring process in the U.K. goes fairly quick. But that means that in Q4 we will have that combined effect, and then hopefully we will be ready in Q1 on the new base. And just think, just adding to that, so it wasn't lost as well with what I shared. So we sort of the issue with Wilko, that came to light very early in quarter three. So we basically, in this quarter, we have hardly any sales relating to Wilko. So when we think about Q4 versus Q3, that's those are fairly like for like already. And then, as Henri said, the restructuring, of course, that needs to take, you know, it's time to follow all the requirements around that. Okay, that's perfectly clear, and thanks a lot. Second question is on the Greenfield factory. First of all, why are you closing this plant in Holland next year? It's one of the plants which we got through the acquisition of Lonka. We have been struggling with the profitability of some of the parts of this portfolio, so we saw an opportunity now to get rid of some of these parts, and it's a rented production facilities. We were not the owners of that of the building. In the original plan, we were going to move a small part of that into the new Greenfield, but now we found a different solution for that, so that we don't have to wait with executing that, which means that we get those savings earlier and also that we can save a bit of CapEx in the Greenfield, because we're not going to build that into the new Greenfield. So that is basically the background of that, and then we will be going out of that in the second half of 2024. Okay. But sorry, this outsourcing, will that contribute to a net increase in costs? I heard you were renting the facility, so that will go away, of course, but that I think you already impaired all the fixtures previously for these factories that were planned to be closed. So what will be the net effect of costs from this move? It's insourcing and outsourcing. So some parts of this production, we will actually insource in one of our existing factories. That will have a positive effect, of course, on the fixed cost of that factory because there's more volume coming in into that, into that plant. Of course, there, it's an existing line, but there's always a bit of cost associated with moving a line from one plant to to another. And then the outsourcing, I think we've been able to do that on a competitive level so that in the totality, it has a positive effect. Yes. Yeah, I mean, I would add to this, that so part of the solution here, we would not have found that if we hadn't spent the time on the Greenfield. So it's really... I mean, in a way, you can think of it as network optimization. I think we actually, that's what we called this when we had the Investor Day a year ago as well, sort of supply chain restructuring. So in that optimization, as Henri says, you know, there's other benefits that come in. So we don't do an updated business case today, but yeah, there is no reason to assume that there will be any extra cost next year as a result of this. Okay, that sounds good. Thanks. Third question on the gross margin, I guess. But looking at the Q4, will there be a significantly smaller impact on the gross margin from previous price hikes compared to what we saw in Q3? Well, I mean, I think what we've seen now in Q3 is that we are having pricing on top of pricing, right? So that's that will be the same thing when we go into Q4 as well. And of course, given that it's more and more cost and more and more pricing, so the compression effect, you know, kind of gets bigger and bigger all the time. I think the other sort of big thing I wanted to flag for Q4 again, so it's not lost, is that actually, already when we came out of the pandemic, we stepped up our spend in Q4 on the brands. And part of that is preparations, you know, heading into the new year, but it's also to get a, you know, good push at the end of the year. We did the same thing last year. It was a pretty big step up, and what I shared there is that we will do a similar big step up also this year. So I think in terms of margins, that will be have a much bigger effect than the, let's say, the change in compression quarter-over-quarter. I'm not sure I understood. So, I was talking about the pricing impact on the gross margin, 'cause you said in the report that you have covered more of the input costs this year than you did last year. I was just wondering, is that. Did we already see that impact in Q4 last year? It sounded like we didn't, so there would be also more of the input costs covered in Q4 this year than last year. So, let me see if I-- So last year, and, in the beginning of the year, right? We hadn't caught up on the pricing, and during Q3, we caught up, and let's say by end of the year, we were there, and that had a compression effect. Then during this year, costs have continued to go up, and we've continued to take more pricing, and we're sort of pacing, you know, fairly well right now. If I stripped out from this quarter the pricing and just assume we would have the same profit without the pricing, we would have been at close to 11% operating profit adjusted. So versus the, you know, 9.5% we're at now. So the more pricing we take, the more compression effect we will have. So, but it's not a huge difference, Q4 versus Q3, but where we will have a big difference on operating profit adjusted margin, that is the step up of marketing investments in Q4 versus what we have done in Q3. Okay, so let's talk about marketing expenses. So what's the year-on-year Q4 marketing spend increase? Yeah. So I mean, we will. We already stepped up in Q4 last year, so year-over-year, it's, you know, fairly similar. Okay. So what we did this year in Q3, it's a little bit lower than what it was in the first two quarters. The same thing as it was last year. So it's, you know, fairly similar, and then we do a step up in Q4. So let's say the trend is very similar this year to what we had last year. Okay. But, but Q3 this year was a bit lower than Q3 last year? Q3 this year was fairly similar to Q3 last year, but it was less than what we had in Q1 and Q2. Okay. Okay, I, I think I understand, I understand. Let's see. I think those were all... Oh, yeah, the final one would be back to the Greenfield factory. So because of this delay, are there, and you, you say the return on investment is unchanged, et cetera, et cetera, but do you have any sort of running costs that are now ticking, because of this delay? Any significant costs? No, not significant. I mean, as you've seen in our items affecting comparability, we do have, you know, engineering costs, et cetera. And in the CapEx, I mentioned there's like SEK 5 million of capitalized interest. But in the scheme of things, this is not big money, and even for the land, the conditional land purchase, it's secured through a bank guarantee, so there is no cash out there either. So no- Down payment, you mean? Yeah, no, no, no payment. So, no, it's sort of, let's say, the whole thing pushes back the major CapEx outflow, the cash outflow, that's pushed back, and of course, unfortunately, the EBIT upside is also pushed back. Okay, that's great. Thank you very much. Thank you, Nicklas. As a reminder, if you wish to raise the floor question, you may press star and one. There are no more questions over the phone. Good, and we don't see any more questions here on the web either. So then I would like to thank you all for attending this call, and we will talk again in on the Q4 results. Thank you very much.