Good morning, and a warm welcome to Electrolux second quarter 2022 results presentation. My name is Jonas Samuelson, and with me, I have our CFO, Therese Friberg, and our Head of Investor Relations, Sophie Arnius. Before starting, I'd like to mention that this session is recorded and will be available on our website as an on-demand version. Let's look at our performance in the second quarter of 2022. Organic sales were flat with an operating income of SEK 0.6 billion or 1.7% of net sales. Like in the first quarter, we faced significant supply chain challenges in Q2. The irregular deliveries of multiple components, mainly electronics, continued to substantially lower our volumes and caused severe production inefficiencies and high costs for air freight and spot buys. In North America, labor shortages and a faulty critical component issue further aggravated the situation, and the business area made a loss in the quarter. The decline in market demand compared to a strong quarter last year also contributed to lower volumes. Industry shipments were in the quarter impacted by supply chain constraints in specific product categories and by softening consumer demand following high general inflation and increased interest rates. Despite the constrained environment, we still delivered solid mix improvements as we continue to have strong demand for our newer and innovative products and optimize the use of available components. However, we could not fully meet the underlying demand, especially in laundry and premium cooking. Our strong price realization continued, and we offset the significant cost inflation, mainly in raw materials and logistics. The significant, mainly supply-driven volume decline and related inefficiencies thus fully account for the year-over-year earnings deterioration. Therese will now walk us through the main drivers behind the change in operating income. We had a strong organic contribution to earnings in the quarter. As Jonas mentioned, we continued to have very good price realization from our list price increases implemented both during this quarter and previous quarters. While the promotional activity normalized somewhat from a previously very low level, our attractive product and brand offering generated a positive mix despite limitations from the supply chain constraints, and aftermarket sales grew in the quarter. Volumes declined significantly, mainly as a result of the global supply chain constraints in combination with labor shortage and production interruption related to a faulty component in North America that impacted product availability negatively. Our investments in consumer experience, innovation, and marketing increased to support strategic growth initiatives and the product launches. Cost efficiency was negative. The supply chain constraints resulted in considerably increased cost for logistics and components, as well as large inefficiencies in production. The higher cost was both inflation-driven and due to use of express rates and spot buys of components. Price offset the continued significant cost inflation, mainly in raw material that is included in the external factors and in logistics that is part of the cost efficiency. Let's take a deeper look at our price and mix development. The EBIT margin accretion for the group from price and mix in the quarter was 13.1 percentage points. This was mainly from price, as we continue to have a strong price execution across all regions, driven by the list price increases implemented both during this year and in 2021 to offset the significant cost inflation. Promotional activities started to normalize, mainly in North America and in Latin America. Mix also contributed to improve the quarter for the group. In Europe, mix was favorable, even though the lack of specific electronic components especially impacted the laundry category negatively. I'm very pleased that our clear focus on premium brands, Electrolux and AEG, as well as on high mix products, really showed a positive mix also this quarter. In North America, our ability to drive mix was severely impacted by shortages of multiple components. By optimizing the allocation of the available components, we managed to keep the mix flat in the quarter. In Latin America, mix was positive. It is great to see how well received our products, product launches enabled by our re-engineering program are by the consumers, especially since consumer purchasing power is decreasing in the region as a whole. An improved product availability and significant growth in aftermarket sales also contributed to the mix improvement. In Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa, mix increased, partly driven by successful product launches, as you will hear about in a moment. An attractive product and brand offering is essential for our profitable growth, and Jonas will now give you some concrete examples of what we do. Emerging markets growth is a key strategic pillar for us. Based upon our manufacturing hub in Egypt, we're introducing new tailored products for the Middle East Africa region. In 2022, new water heaters were launched, which have been very well received by Egyptian consumers with a star rating of 4.89 out of 5. The launch will continue in more countries such as Morocco and Libya until 2023. Product developments that improve the user experience have been key, with particular focus on comfort, safety, and hygiene. Heating efficiency has increased, making almost 30% more hot water available at the same capacity compared to the current platform. By introducing a new material for enhanced heater insulation, heat loss has been reduced by around 15%, making these products both more energy efficient and cost effective for users. I would also like to mention our new Electrolux kitchen range that was launched in Australia and New Zealand during the quarter. The launch includes premium multi-door refrigerators, built-in ovens, built-in hobs, and freestanding cookers. In the launch, we leverage our Swedish heritage and emphasize sustainability aspects, extending the Make It Last campaign that we've used for laundry products to the Taste category. The multi-door fridges and built-in ovens will progressively be launched across other markets in the region. One important factor I'd like to emphasize is that the multi-door fridges are built in Rayong in Thailand based on our global modularized product platform for refrigerators. It's a very good example of how we, through the modularized platform, can leverage our global scale, accelerate innovation speed, and have higher production flexibility. In this specific case, a significant part of the production is also exported to the North American market. These are some examples on how we drive profitable growth. Operating cash flow for the second quarter amounted to SEK 400 million. We are now back to a more normal seasonality in operating working capital. However, the actual inventory levels is elevated due to high cost inflation and impacts related to supply chain constraints, such as longer time in transit, inefficiencies, and generally high component stock while still missing certain components. We intend to optimize the inventory levels during the second half of the year. In addition, a lower operating income and a higher level of investments compared to last year impacted cash flow negatively versus last year. Let's now go into our business areas performance in Q2, starting with Europe. Organic net sales declined 7.7% versus last year, where strong price and mix were more than offset by volume decline. Russia, Ukraine was a significant factor, but the biggest challenge was electronic component availability, impacting primarily fabric care and pre-premium food preparation. We also saw weakening consumer confidence and inflation impacting general demand. Price realization was strong in the quarter, with new list prices implemented during the quarter, fully offsetting external factors. The positive mix realization was driven by prioritization of premium brands, products, and sales channels. EBIT was heavily impacted by the production volume losses, resulting in both lower gross profit contribution and significant manufacturing inefficiencies. Additionally, high cost for express logistics and spot buys continued to weigh on the results. Let's look at the European market. In the second quarter, overall market demand in Europe declined by 10%. Western Europe declined by 8%, and demand in Eastern Europe by 15%. If we exclude Russia, Eastern Europe declined by 10%. For Europe as a whole, we have to remember that we're comparing to a strong quarter last year, and we remain above pre-pandemic levels. Market shipments were significantly impacted by supply chain constraints, limiting product availability. In addition, the negative impact on consumer demand from the high general inflation, increased interest rates, and increased geopolitical tensions accelerated during the quarter. Retailers' inventory levels are estimated to be at medium to high levels in general. Let's continue with our business area in North America. We had an EBIT loss with flat sales, where supply constraints continued to impact our operations heavily with the regular supply of multiple components. Combined with labor shortages, this resulted in production volume losses, significant production inefficiencies, and high costs for air freight and spot buys of components. In addition, an isolated issue with a critical faulty component, which was fixed during the second quarter, resulted in lower volumes for specific high-mix products and lower productivity. A strategic decision to move away from certain source products categories with low profitability also contributed to the lower sales volumes in the quarter. The combination of these challenges severely impacted our earnings. We managed to have a flat mix development through an optimized component allocation. Price developed strongly, driven by list price increases. Although promotion started to normalize, net price fully offset significant cost inflation, mainly in raw materials and logistics. Looking at the U.S. market, industry shipments of core appliances in the U.S. decreased by 6% compared to a strong last year. Compared to the first quarter of 2019, industry shipments still increased by 11%. High general inflation and increased interest rates started to impact consumer demand negatively, which resulted in increased inventory at retailers in general. In specific product categories, supply chain constraints continued to limit the ability to fully meet underlying demand. Market demand for all major appliances, including microwave ovens and home comfort products, decreased by 9% year-over-year. Let's move on to Latin America. Market demand was weak in mainly Brazil and Chile, while positive from low levels in Argentina. We also saw good performance in Northern Latin America. Strong price performance more than offset the lower sales volumes, resulting in organic growth of 13%. We also saw a positive mix from a large number of new product launches despite the market pressures. The strong price execution more than offset the impact of inflation and currency in the quarter, and investments in marketing were increased to support the new product launches. Finally, turning to Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, we saw positive demand in most key markets in the quarter, notably Southeast Asia and Australia, New Zealand. New price increases started to have effect in the quarter, supported by new product launches. However, although the availability of electronics improved sequentially in the region, it still caused constraints of key products. Prices fully offset inflationary and currency headwinds, resulting in a solid EBIT. Let's turn to the market outlook. The market environment has, since 2020, been highly volatile, and it continues to rapidly change. Inflation soaring to historically high levels, and higher interest rates, and supply constraints exacerbated by uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the war in Ukraine result in limited visibility for the rest of the year. We maintain our regional market demand outlook for 2022, with the exception of North America, which is revised to negative. However, we still expect demand to be above pre-pandemic levels, except for in Latin America, as well as the Russian market impact on Europe. In the first half of the year, global supply chain constraints impacted the industry's ability to fully meet the underlying demand. In the second half of the year, we expect a slowdown in consumer demand to be the main constraint for industry shipments, while the global supply chain situation is expected to improve. Let's look at our 2022 full year volume demand view year-over-year for specific regions. In Europe, we expect market shipments to be negative. High general inflation, rising interest rates, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine have resulted in a sharp drop in consumer confidence. Hence, consumer spending is expected to further deteriorate, and to what extent is still uncertain. In Russia and Ukraine, we expect market demand to drop significantly. The replacement market, which in general drives roughly 60% of demand in more mature markets such as Western Europe, is still assessed to be supportive. In terms of market value, higher average selling price is expected to offset the decline in market shipments. In North America, demand is estimated to be negative for the full year compared to our previous flat view. This is mainly driven by an anticipated further slowdown in consumer demand as soaring general inflation and rising interest rates negatively impact consumer purchasing power. However, on the positive side, we expect support from the housing market, low unemployment rates, and the replacement cycle. We also see a shortening of the cycle, ownership cycle due to increased usage during the pandemic. In Latin America, we expect consumer demand for 2022 to be negative, driven by Brazil and Chile. In both Brazil and Chile, higher general inflation and increased nominal interest rates, combined with reduction of government aid and uncertainty on the political situation contribute to the negative demand view. In Argentina, consumer demand growth is expected to continue in 2022, but we have to bear in mind that it's from a weak baseline from several years that's starting to catch up. Finally, we estimate market demand in the Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa region to be positive for the full year 2022, mainly driven by Southeast Asia, which is a large market for us in the region. In general, we have so far seen underlying consumer demand being solid across most markets in the region, and the uncertainty going forward is mainly around potential pandemic restrictions and impact from general higher inflation on consumer demand. For Australia, which is our other large market, we expect solid demand for the year compared to a strong 2021, with a decline for the second half of the year given an expected slowdown in consumer demand. Let's now look at the business outlook. The second quarter has been challenging with regards to the constrained environment. In volatile times, as we're now experiencing, it's vital to continue on our long-term strategic journey while also being efficient and agile. I'm pleased with our achievements over the last years, where we step by step consistently have improved earnings quality through a clear strategy for driving profitable growth, providing relevant innovations under well-established brands to our target consumers, and delivering these products with high quality and automated production. These are key success factors also going forward in the dynamic environment that we're facing with high general inflation and increased geopolitical tension, as well as continuing supply chain constraints and pandemic. In 2021, the combined contribution from volume, price and mix to operating income was nearly SEK 9 billion. We expect this organic year-over-year contribution to be even higher in 2022, mainly driven by price, but also increasing sales of innovative high-margin products and aftermarket solutions. Price is our main tool to offset cost inflation, and we have a strong track record of successfully doing this. Through strong price execution, we offset significant cost inflation in the first half of the year, primarily in raw material and logistics. We remain confident to do so also in the full year as we've done for the past four years. In an inflationary environment, price increases are more accepted in the market. This, combined with an attractive product range, makes us well-positioned to continue to be successful in raising prices if needed. Just to be clear on what we mean with cost inflation, it comprises of two parts. First, external factors, which include raw material, currency, tariffs, and excess labor cost inflation. Second, the cost inflation in, for example, sourced finished goods, electronic components, and logistics, which is included in our cost efficiency in the business outlook. Starting with external factors, we maintain our estimate of a negative headwind in the range of SEK 8 billion-SEK 10 billion. The year-over-year increase is mainly driven by raw material, especially steel price. Recently, we've seen steel prices coming down substantially from very high levels in the spring, but not significantly enough to impact second half year's contracted costs. The constrained global supply environment has resulted in cost inflation, especially for logistics, in particular ocean freight, but also for electronic components. The increased geopolitical tension has mainly impacted logistics through higher fuel prices. If we shift focus from price to the other two levels within organic contribution, we now expect the combined contribution from volume and mix to be negative for the full year instead of positive. Due to the softer consumer demand outlook, we now expect year-over-year volume decline seen in the first half of the year to also continue in the second half, though at a lower degree. We expect higher volumes in the second half than in the first, with sequentially improved supply outweighing the negative impact of weaker consumer demand. We still expect a strong earnings contribution from mix for the full year, and 2022 is our most launch-intensive year ever, partly enabled by our re-engineering program. I'm very pleased with the strong consumer demand for our new innovative product and the earnings contribution from these launches. This gives us confidence that consumer demand for our products will remain healthy also in a more challenging environment, and provides us with a great platform to drive mix improvements. We aim to invest more in innovation and marketing to support these launches, but also to strengthen our digital capabilities supporting the consumer interactions. In recent years, mix improvements have contributed an average of SEK 1 billion to operating income. Global supply chain constraints are expected to sequentially improve from mid-2022, with continued risk of disruptions relating to the resurgence of the coronavirus as well as consequences of the war in Ukraine. Looking specifically at the cost efficiency, we expect this to be negative for the year. Main drivers are cost inflation on logistics, finished goods, and components, as well as production inefficiencies related to constrained environment, especially in North America. We estimate the elevated cost level for air freight and spot buys of electronic components to remain in the second half of the year. We will also see an increase in depreciation as we continue to start up additional production lines and new product platforms in our factories that are part of our SEK 8 billion re-engineering program. On the positive side, we expect cost savings from the re-engineering program in 2022, even if the full efficiency gains are dependent on a stable volume and supply chain. Investments to strengthen our competitiveness through innovation, automation, and modularization continue in 2022, and total capital expenditures are estimated to be in the range of SEK 7 billion-SEK 8 billion. The increase compared to 2021 relates mainly to some timing of investments from 2021 and raw material inflation on equipment. To sum up the quarter and the strategic drivers that we've delivered on, this has been a very challenging quarter, but there are highlights. In this inflationary environment, a strong price development is crucial, and we continue to successfully execute list price increases in all regions. This makes me confident that price will fully offset cost inflation for the full year as it has done for the past four years. I'm also very pleased with the way we continue to drive mix, increasing sales of our high-margin products despite the supply constraint environment and softening consumer confidence. It shows how well our new innovative products are being received by consumers, a key driver for us to deliver profitable growth. With the new organization effective July 1st, we further expand our strategic scope with a dedicated commercial and consumer journey team. So far, we've successfully executed on better products, more targeted brands, and increased manufacturing efficiency. We now expand our focus beyond the product itself to all interactions we have with our consumers, including aftermarket. In volatile times as we're now experiencing, being efficient and agile is important, but it's vital to simultaneously progress on our long-term strategy. With that, I leave the word to Sophie. Thank you, Jonas and Therese. We will now open up for questions. As you know, to allow as many of you to ask questions, please limit it to one question per person. You are of course welcome to enter the Q&A queue again and ask additional questions if time allows. Moderator, please open up for questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, to register for a question, please press zero followed by the one on your telephone keypad. Our first question comes from Uma Samlin from Bank of America. Please go ahead, your line is open. Hi, good morning, everyone. Thank you very much for taking my question. I just, my first question is on the European market. In Q2, your organic growth was at -8%. The market unit growth was at -10%. If I assume that you had a bit of price increases in Europe, does it mean that you're actually losing some market share given the supply chain issues? If we look at a bit longer term, how do you think about the European market evolution going forward? Do you see the low-cost players such as like Beko, for example, taking more share given their cost advantages? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks for the question. We did lose share in the quarter. The biggest factor was that we're not selling in Russia, so others have been, so we're losing share from that. Underlying the real issue is again, the availability of electronics components, which was very challenging during the quarter, particularly as I mentioned in our fabric care laundry operations and in premium food preparation. There we had a worse supply situation apparently than the overall market situation. We did lose some share also in the rest of Europe in the quarter. As we go forward, we're seeing improvements step by step in that supply environment. We expect to over time not be negatively impacted versus the overall market when it comes to availability. That's an improvement that we're seeing kind of on a step-by-step basis, not from just one day to the next. You know, as we then look at the market, we had in Q1 and Q2 of 2021 very strong demand. In the second half of 2021, volumes decreased in the market as a whole. That was to a large extent driven by the emergence of these supply issues that we're still experiencing. You know, as we go into the second half of the year, we expect our supply situation to get better and but at the same time, to the point, the consumer demand is sequentially weakening. The net of the two we expect to be a positive for volume for us in Europe in the second half versus the first half. Still year over year, the market is going down in the second half. This is, by the way, true for our overall outlook for the group as well. Europe being a big driver of that. I guess that you expect the supply chain issues to improve gradually in H2 this year? Yes. That's correct. Yes. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Andre Kukhnin from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Yes, good morning. Thanks so much for taking my question. I wanted to clarify maybe a bit further on the supply chain issues in the quarter sequentially for Europe and North America, that kind of impact where we were losing kind of SEK 460 million and SEK 370 million of profit across the two regions, and then that expectation for the second half improvement with the visibility that you have. Do you think we can get to at least the Q1 run rate with that improvement in component availability? Or is that too ambitious given your expectations for demand? On a year-over-year basis, I would say the hit is, I mean, for the group as a whole, relatively similar in Q1 and Q2, right? We lost about SEK 1.5 billion of EBIT, both in Q1 and in Q2 versus the prior year. It shifted a bit between the business areas. Whereas, you know, Latin American and APAC, MEA, became better quarter-over-quarter, Europe and North America overall were more challenged in the second quarter. Mm. The issue then on the supply that we faced here in Q1 and Q2, and the projected improvements, we were clear also in the first quarter that we expected Q2 to be tough, and then we saw gradual improvements from the second half of the year. That's still how we see it and what we see coming. It's a step-by-step improvement. It's not from one day to the next, but we are having visibility to better supply in Q3 than we had in Q2, and even better supply in Q4 than we see in Q3. It's an ongoing improvement that we see ahead of us. You know, even though sort of general consumer demand is weakening, we still, as I mentioned to the prior question, we're still seeing improvement in the overall shipments in the second half compared to in the first half. Right. If I may just follow up, Jonas, on Europe and North America specifically, 'cause it's quite hard for us to get any visibility or any insight into how those component shortages issues are phasing. Clearly, they managed to have a substantial impact in the second quarter and first quarter, while you did say it gets worse in Q2, but broader messaging and industrial seems to be that kind of shortages were sort of evening out, compared to sort of beginning of the year. There's not been that much kind of worsening, while here we've got quite a substantial impact. I'm just trying to gauge Whether there is a relief kind of in Q3, Q4 that brings us back to Q1 in terms of kind of that availability of supply for you from what you see from suppliers already, or is that too ambitious to think about it specifically for Europe and North America? Yeah. Actually, I would say the specific electronic supply situation was actually more or less as we had predicted in the second half. We saw this improvement in availability coming already in Q1, but from Q3 and on. We were pretty clear about that also in the, you know, after Q1. Yeah, it shifts around a bit because these are very specific components going to specific products. Also in the quarter, we had high impact specifically on our higher margin laundry and premium food preparation products in Europe as well as in North America. We had this specific component issue in North America that's since been fixed. We're actually not really changing our view there. We do see improvement sequentially now from Q3, and that's expected to further improve in Q4 and into next year. Step-by-step, we're coming back to a more normalized supply environment. Again, we expect that to be a bigger positive than the negative we see from consumer demand in the second half versus the first half. Got it. Thank you for your time. Sure. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Johan Eliason from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is now open. Yeah. Good morning, Jonas, Therese, and Sophie. I'm not envying you, the juggling you have to do right now with the things going left and right. On one topic, external factors, i.e. raw materials. I think when you entered this year, you indicated you had a lower than normal hedging volume for steel. I'm sort of just wondering in Q2 when we saw these rapid steel price hikes coming, or was it end of Q1? Did you sort of basically hedge the rest of the year? Or how is the hedging volumes looking right now, considering your comment on lower steel price not impacting you yet for the second half? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks for the sympathy, first of all. On the raw material outlook. For steel, we have a fairly significant portion of our contract on certain types of pricing mechanisms. Prices for the second half for a portion of our supply is impacted by mechanisms related to the average prices in the first half. There we've seen a bit of a rollercoaster, as you hinted. We saw a big spike and then it dropped back substantially from those spike levels. On average, that means that our price level for the second half is more or less similar to what we had already guided for. Now of course, the fact that steel prices have dropped back from those spikes is very good news. You know, as we go forward, we still consider steel to be at sort of historically elevated levels with further downside potential. That's something that we will of course work on and push for as we go into next year. For the rest of this year, the vast majority is now locked in. Okay. It's an issue for next year then. Okay, thank you very much. Yep. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from William Turner from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead, your line is open. Morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. When we look into the remainder of the year, it's pretty clear that consumer demand is reducing. As you mentioned earlier on the call, that retailer inventory levels are healthier. In my mind, I can see it being a lot more challenging to push through higher prices going forward. At the same time, obviously you've got quite intense cost inflation. My question is, what can Electrolux do to get off these low margin levels that you've had in the second quarter? There's obviously the improving supply chain situation, but I can imagine, like I said, pricing will be tougher to push through. Or should we really be expecting a challenging couple of quarters ahead of us until the cost inflation abates? In terms of the cost inflation, I think for us, the big hits have already come, right? Our big exposures are steel, plastics and logistics, ocean freight and overland logistics. Those are the areas where we have by far the highest pressure. Labor costs for us is a fairly, you know, as you know, fairly small portion of our total cost. I think we've already had most of the cost pressure that we're gonna see this cycle, unless something dramatic happens, which it can. We've already raised prices for a significant or most of that cost inflation, as you saw in the quarter with very strong net price realization. We have announced some further price increases taking effect now, in some areas, mainly in Europe and LATAM. We're constantly, of course, reviewing the need for any further price increases. If you think about the composition of our result here in the second quarter, also first quarter, we were able to offset these inflationary pressures, the underlying inflationary pressures. What we're not able to offset is, you know, very high volume drops compared to what we had planned for, and the significant inefficiencies related to those volume drops. We talked a lot about express freight spot buys, but also the fact that we have. We're running with substantially too high manufacturing costs given the volumes that we're able to produce. It's not easy to adjust the cost level to that lower production volume since it's so unpredictable as we've been guiding for. As we go forward, I think the biggest improvement factor that we see is more steady supply, meaning we can plan our production in a more steady way and significantly reduce the amount of express logistics and spot buys. Those factors in themselves are, you know, if they occur or when they occur, sufficient to restore our profitability. The challenge of course is that the visibility on exactly how that plays out going forward is not fantastic, neither for us nor for you, of course. It's less about price and inflation. It's much more about supply and availability of the right components at the right time, and to be able to plan our operations accordingly. That's again where we see improvements coming into the second half of the year. Okay. Yeah. Very interesting. Thanks for sharing that. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Olof Cederholm from ABG. Please go ahead, your line is open. Yes. Hi, everyone. Just another question on the supply situation, and particularly with more component availability in the second half. Will you be able to direct those components towards the most profitable products that were particularly weak in Q2? Or is that out of your control? It's to marginally at our control, I would say. Unfortunately, the components vary quite a bit between different product categories and executions. You can, you know, just to illustrate it. The type of display on a product is, you know, varies a lot. If it's a touch display or a rotating dial and so on, and that requires different electronic components. So we can't really swap between those. Same goes for power electronics. You know, depending on the energy efficiency requirement, depending on lots of different things, we have different components. So that's why the predictability becomes so low, that you know, we don't have a ton of flexibility to shift mix around. We may actually have too much of one component and too little of another one. This has been our challenge now for the last year, effectively. Now we are seeing that step by step, we're getting more visibility on which components we'll get, and gradually we're also seeing better supply of those, components going into our premium product. You know, visibility is still limited, I would say, but definitely improving. Excuse me. Excellent. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Krista Magnusson from DNB. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Morning. The cost component that you mentioned a couple of times in the report and on the call, can you give a bit more flavor on that one and the implication it had? Yeah. We don't wanna go into too much explicit details, but in this one it's relating to a critical component that goes into a range of important high margin products that we have in North America, where we had significant quality issues that stopped us from producing that in the quarter and also resulted in rework of a number of products. That was fully addressed in the quarter and is now back to full production flow and distribution flow. Is it possible to quantify the effects on earnings as the ballpark effect? You know, it's clearly noticeable. It's not to the point where it's material and requiring, let's say, a specific quantification. Okay. Just a quick on share buybacks. Net up 1.7 times now and the visibility is still quite poor. What are your thoughts on the ongoing and continued share buybacks beyond the current mandate? We're halfway through the current mandate approximately, and that's continuing according to plan. The board will assess then whether to continue with a new mandate in the October timeframe. It's too early to have a point of view on that. Thank you. Just to clarify, we have a current mandate of SEK 1.25 billion or up to 8 million shares, and that's where we're pretty much halfway through that. Mm-hmm. Thanks. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Gustav Hagéus from SEB. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I have a question regarding the initial assumption of the cost savings for the re-engineering program. I believe last time you quantified this might have been in 2019. If I recall correctly, you were then referencing a cost savings versus 2019 of SEK 3 billion+. Since then you've referenced the timeline hasn't really gone through all that the initial planned savings due to erratic supply constraints, supply components and so forth. If we're now looking in a situation in H2 in 2023, when that part of the issue is actually much better, and as you referenced, volumes will be higher as you see it versus 2019. Do you then see that initial estimate of yours for 2023 of SEK 3 billion+ in savings might actually materialize? Thanks. Yeah. When it comes to sort of the underlying, to your point, the underlying drivers of those improvements, most of those are in place. We're concentrating manufacturing of food preservation and food preparation in North America into two factories. The first step of that has been done. Food preservation is consolidated. Food preparation, we're still in the early stages of the phase-in of that new range of cooking products. That's still to come. On the food preservation side, you know, as mentioned, you know, the underlying factors are there. We've consolidated the factories, we've introduced the highly automated production processes. We've modularized the product. The underlying drivers are there. Of course, as you're well aware, we have a situation with massively increased raw material costs, logistics costs, labor availability is very challenging, and then we have these component supply issues. While those are all improving in the second half, I would struggle to say that they're normal, expected to be normal, in the second half. We'll see improvements. Definitely, again, the underlying conditions to realize those benefits are there. The other thing that we mentioned is that, you know, compared to the initial forecast that we had on cost reductions, we've changed the mix quite substantially in our production. We're producing more of our higher margin, higher featured, product and a bit less of our lower margin, high, sort of mass product. While we expect the same benefits, the way they come through is a little bit different. A little bit less in net sort of cost savings, a little bit more in mix improvements. But that definitely stays, as previously guided. All right. Thank you, guys. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Martin Wilkie from Citi. Please go ahead, your line is open. Yeah, thank you. Good morning. It's Martin from Citi. The question I had was on pricing. Obviously, very good performance across the industry so far on pricing. We do get comments that promotional activity, things like that, have obviously been curtailed to some degree because of lack of supply. As we go into the second half, if supply eases and therefore industry volumes are more able to be delivered, is there a risk that you start getting more promotional activity? How should we think about that in terms of pricing in the second half? Thank you. No, I actually do expect promotional activity in terms of the promotional cadence to start to normalize, which is, in my view, not necessarily a bad thing because it also serves to drive volume to some extent. I think the cost realities are what they are for us and for other players in the market. I don't expect, you know, very deep discounting like we had prior to the pandemic. You know, a more sort of healthy, normalized promotional cadence is not necessarily a bad thing for our sales and profitability over time. Of course, we have to watch out and see that it doesn't escalate, but we don't really see that happening across the board right now. You know, in terms of our outlook, our guidance in terms of, you know, pricing offsetting cost inflation, that's still. I mean, that takes into account that there will be a certain amount of normalization in promotional activity. Great. That's helpful. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Akash Gupta from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead, your line is open. Yes. Hi, good morning, and thanks for your time. My question was on your market demand comments for Europe and North America, where you expect negative development. Maybe if you can elaborate on what level of negative development are we expecting in both of the regions. Clearly Europe has already gone down quite significantly already in Q2. Are we talking about high single-digit decline in volumes for the year or more like double-digit decline? Similarly, if any similar comments you can provide on North America, that'd be great. Thank you. Yeah. Obviously we don't give specific guidance, but what I can do is to give a little bit more context. Honestly being able to guide and also look at the numbers is challenging. If you go back then, you know, a couple of years, the first half of 2020 was super bad for the industry with lockdowns and COVID and coronavirus. Then we saw this roaring recovery, particularly in Q1 and Q2 of 2021. Also the second half of 2020 was quite strong. You know, then in the second half of 2021, the industry actually started to decline. Most of that decline, though, was driven by the fact that industry supply was impacted by component availability. We had constraints in the second half of 2021, but not yet really driven by weaker consumer confidence or anything like that. As we go into the first quarter of 2022, industry is still constrained by availability, but then we see a normalization and decline in demand from those very elevated levels of 2021. I think it's important to note, as we did, that demand is still above that 2019 level or total sales are above that 2019 level in the first half of 2022. We expect that to be the case also for the second half of 2022. You know, continued negative development year-over-year in the second half in terms of overall demand. For us, we expect the improvement in supply that we are expecting now in the second half of the year to actually be a net positive compared to the first half of the year. You obviously, these complexities in terms of comparison, I understand that it makes it challenging to fully track it. What we are able to say is that despite this continued weakening in consumer demand, we expect to ship more volume in the second half than in the first since we are getting better supply. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is a follow-up question from Andre Kukhnin from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Yes, thank you very much for taking the follow-up question. I just wanted to check on that faulty component issue quantification. Could you share with us what is the materiality requirement for disclosure? Kind of what level would it need to be for you to We haven't given that, but that's something that, yeah, that's internal to us. Okay. Okay, fair enough. If I may, just on promotional activity, I wonder if you could help us with that differentiation as what you've just said about deep discounting versus promotional activity actually being helpful to drive volumes. It's still somewhat perplexing that in an environment where it's hard to fulfill existing demand, there's promotional activity coming back. Is it to do with kind of driving promotions on specific products that you can supply and hence we would like to maximize? Is that the way to think about it? Yeah. First of all, we're not talking about major promotional deep discounting. It's more, you know, for example, in North America, there's always kind of a Labor Day event or a Memorial Day event or and so on. For the past few, you know, couple of years now, those have been essentially non-existent. Now we do see them, those, you know, events coming back. Retailers have inventory, so they definitely want to promote. Now, you know, as we've kind of indicated here in the first half of the year, we have been more impacted than the industry as a whole from in terms of component availability. As that now improves in the second half of the year, we definitely expect to start that, you know, restart that promotional cadence. Again, this is not necessarily a negative thing for us. We think we expect to sell higher volumes. Even if that means a little bit more promotional spend, we have raised prices to the point where and continuing to raise prices to the point where we can afford that, also given the inflationary headwinds. Got it. Thanks very much. The overall equation is what we're trying to optimize in terms of growth contribution, let's say, sales. Right. Got it. Thank you, Jonas. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Kari Rinta from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Yes. Thank you. Karri Rinta, Handelsbanken. I wanted to get some clarity on your thinking and policy when it comes to pre-announcement, because you did report quite a bit below consensus expectations for the second quarter. Since you don't give any sort of guidance on a quarterly basis, so should I understand that you only pre-announce if you see that your full year performance is deviating materially from consensus expectations? Or is there some other reasoning behind not pre-announcing the second quarter numbers? Yeah. No, I mean, obviously we take that very, very seriously, you know. What would trigger any type of pre-announcement. You know, what we relate to, that's what the regulations say is, you know, the performance in relation to what we have previously communicated and what can be reasonably expected based on what we have previously communicated. That's the assessment that we continuously make. Clearly here, again, as mentioned, we saw a profit drop of about SEK 1.5 Billion in Q1. We saw a profit drop of about SEK 1.5 Billion in Q2. We had clearly indicated that we expected Q2 to be as challenging as Q1, with low visibility on the specifics. In this case, we evaluated the performance. We concluded that we didn't have a requirement to communicate. It's something we take incredibly seriously. All right. Fair enough. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our last question comes from Johan Eliason from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Yeah. Hi again. Just to follow up on demand and the situation, especially in Europe in terms of energy prices, et cetera. Back in 2007 through 2010, we saw a scrapping premium in the U.S. appliance industry that sort of reignited consumer demand, at least in the first half of 2010 to a significant degree. Do you see any sort of actions like that happening in any significant country in Europe, considering that there's a gas crisis and energy needs to be saved going forward in order to be able to heat the houses over the winters? I've seen a lot of discussion around incentives for energy efficiency. I haven't seen anything specific related to appliances, though, at this point. No. A lot of discussion on the topic to your comment. I think it is clear, though, that the very significant increase in electricity prices makes consumers more conscious about energy consumption, which is a positive overall for us and for mix in demand in Europe, as people are choosing more energy efficient appliances. Yeah. Yeah. That makes sense. We'll see what happens there. Just coming back a little bit on pricing. I think you alluded to in Q1 that prices on average were up some 8%, and now we see price mix was 13% on the margin here. Is the price component higher than this 8% now in the second quarter, or is it the mix effect that has driven the development? No. Price realization is better in Q2 than in Q1. Yeah. Yeah. Okay, perfect. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. There appear to be no further questions. I'll return the conference back to you. Thank you, operator, and thanks, everybody, for very important and good questions. You know, recognizing this has been a very tough quarter, I'm still, you know, pleased with our strong price and mix execution. As we go forward, we'll most likely continue to experience this type of high volatility. Although we do estimate some improvement in the supply situation, as mentioned. It's crucial that we also in this environment continue to sustain our strong focus on innovation. It's clear that it not only pays off in terms of stronger mix, but also drives volume and facilitates necessary price increases. As mentioned, this is our most launch-intensive year ever, and that's continuing in the second half. Adding to the consumer experience of using our products, we're now taking the innovation further, getting closer to the consumer in all interactions, and we're committed to deliver long-term shareholder value through profitable growth. Thank you very much, and talk to you soon again.