Hello, a very warm welcome to Embracer's fiscal Q4 report. Today we have, as always, a lot to talk about. We have very strong sales for Valheim, 6.8 million units sold. We have five days until the release of Biomutant. We also have a pipeline to look forward to. We are going to start today's presentation with a presentation by CEO and founder, Lars Wingefors, and CFO, Johan Ekström. Then I will come back with a Q&A after that. Without further ado, I'll leave it over to you, Lars and Johan. Please go ahead. Thank you, Oscar. Hello, good morning, everyone, and very welcome to Karlstad, Värmland. I'm really pleased to announce another stable quarter. I'm humbled to report this morning a record performance of the group with net sales growing 80% year-over-year to SEK 2.4 billion, and excellence in the games business area, reaching close to SEK 2 billion in sales, driven by 85% organic growth. The partner publishing business was stable at a bit over SEK 400 million. Really pleased to see that the profitability came in strong. We have a 216% increase in the operation EBIT that now are about SEK 900 million in the quarter. The free cash flow came in at more than SEK 860 million in the quarter, and that is more than SEK 585 million more than the same period last year. The record performance was driven mainly by the fantastic sales of Valheim. The game sold 6.8 million copies in the quarter. This morning are reporting we are expecting the game to sell another one to 1.2 million copies in the quarter ending June. A lot of great titles performed during the quarter. A great continued performance of SnowRunner, Metro, and many other titles that also delivered strong back-catalog sales. All in all, we have 160 game development projects under development at the end of the quarter. That is not including the pipeline from Gearbox and Aspyr that came in April 1st. All in all, we are engaging 126 game studios across the world. Whereof about half are internal and half are external, engaging more than 5,000 game developers. We had a record investment into our pipeline. We invested SEK 563 million in the quarter. That is close to five times the value of the game released during the fourth quarter. Looking ahead, we are looking in the current year to have the strongest year ever. We are expecting to complete more than 90 game development projects during the year for an investment value of between SEK 2.8 billion-SEK 3.3 billion. The first quarter, we're expecting SEK 300 million-SEK 350 million. As of today, we have more than SEK 17 billion in cash or available credit lines. That was during the quarter increased by the large ABB we made in March, raising more than SEK 7.5 billion. We have, during the past quarter and up until today, been engaging with a lot of fantastic entrepreneurs and creators and companies across the world. This is ongoing work we are doing. We are reporting this morning to give you a bit of color that we are currently in about 20 late-stage talks with those entrepreneurs and creators. We integrated Gearbox, Easybrain, Aspyr during the April and May, and I'm happy to report that the Easybrain performance are exceeding our expectation at the time of the merger. Announcing this morning the reformation of a new game development studio in the U.K., Free Radical Design, that is headed up by the original founders of the studio, Free Radical Design, the makers behind TimeSplitters. With that said, I would like to leave over to Johan to take you through the financial numbers. Thank you, Lars. Yes. Let's start by looking at our P&L for the quarter and the full year, and we can conclude that during the quarter had a solid sales performance, where we are growing our top line with 80% over last year, reaching SEK 2.4 billion in net sales. Sales is driven by mainly business area games, where we had a strong growth of 119% over last year, and a relatively flat performance in the partner publishing film business area. The top line growth fell through to EBITDA, increasing EBITDA over last year with 137%, reaching SEK 1,172 million in the quarter. Operationally, EBIT in the period, SEK 903 million, which is 216% better than last year, yielding an operational EBIT margin of 38% for the quarter. Profitability was increased by the strong growth in the top line, but also a gross margin expansion through the positive product mix shift from Partner Publishing Film to Business Area Games. Then also within Partner Publishing Film, we had a stable performance of the film segment in the quarter. Looking at our adjusted EPS for the quarter, it amounts to SEK 2.07 per share, which is more than double what we had during the same time last year. Our full year performance is on the top line. We are generating SEK 9 billion in net sales, which is 72% above the same period last year. Our operational EBIT reached close to SEK 2.9 billion for the full financial year, up 178% compared to the year before that, yielding an operational EBIT margin of 32%. Looking at the full year adjusted EPS, it reached SEK 6.44 per share, which is 129% over last year. Also interesting to note is that if you compare this with the EPS at the time of the IPO, it's actually 14 x higher than it was at the time of the IPO. Turning to the amortizations, as you all know, we distinguish between operational amortizations and acquisition-related amortizations. The operational amortization reached SEK 270 million in the quarter, and the acquisition-related amortizations, SEK 758 million in the quarter. The operational amortizations is driven mainly by the amortizations on completed game development projects, which was SEK 202 million in the quarter. Also, other intangible assets mainly related to the film segment added to the operational amortizations. If you look to the acquisition-related amortizations, the majority is related to goodwill, SEK 612 million out of the SEK 758 million, but also acquisition of IP rights. We had a solid cash flow generation in the quarter. The cash flow from operating activities increased 211% versus the same period last year, mainly driven by the increased EBITDA and the profitability. We also continue to invest into our business. The total investment in intangible assets was SEK 599 million in the quarter, where SEK 563 is related to game development. We also had a cash flow related to acquisitions closed during the period of SEK 405 million. Cash flow from financing activities is positive, close to SEK 6.9 billion net in the quarter. It's mainly driven by the share issue that we made in March, but it's also reduced by the reduced utilization of credit facilities in Koch Media. Free cash flow, SEK 861 million in the quarter. Trailing 12 months, SEK 1,685 million in free cash flow. If you look at the quarter, you should also bear in mind that we are investing more than ever into our games portfolio and still generating the SEK 861 million. Taking a close look at the investments made during the quarter, they amount to SEK 599 million. As said, the majority is related to investment into our games portfolio, SEK 563 million. Out of the SEK 563 million, SEK 398 million, or close to SEK 400 million, is investments made through internal studios, and SEK 166 million is investments made with external studios. We also have a SEK 36 million investment in other intangibles, which is mainly related to our film segment. During the quarter, we finalized games of SEK 117 million. This can be compared with the investments made into games during the quarter. If we look at the increase over last year's, we increase with 35% over last year. We had SEK 417 million a year ago in the quarter, now it's SEK 563 million. You can see that we continue to have a higher degree of investments being made with our internal studios. The investments into the games development portfolio also shows in the business related KPIs, where we have increased the amount of studios compared to last year. We had 126 studios by the end of March, not including M&A transactions that were closed in the beginning of April. The amount of developers that are engaged in our development projects is 5,100, and more than twice as much as we had in the same period last year. Projects in pipelines, 160, up 60%, approximately, versus same period last year. If we look at the value of finalized game development, we expect for the first quarter of this 2021/2022 fiscal year to complete and release games to a value of between SEK 300 million and SEK 350 million. For the full year, we expect the amount to be between SEK 2.8 billion and SEK 3.3 billion. The completion will be back-end loaded over the year, where you can see that there's a significant expected release value in Q4. During the year ending March 2022, the ambition is to complete more than 90 game development projects, summing up to this between SEK 2.8 billion and SEK 3.3 billion in completed games value. Turning to our balance sheet, total assets at the end of March was close to SEK 34 billion. Looking at assets, there are significant amounts in intangible assets, at SEK 16.4 billion in total. These can be divided into operational intangible assets, which is SEK 3.9 billion, and acquisition-related intangible assets, which amounts to SEK 12.5 billion. Out of the operational intangible assets, the vast majority is related to our ongoing game development portfolio, which is SEK 3.2 billion, or 82% of the SEK 3.9 billion operational intangible assets. Completed games is SEK 513 million at the end of March. Acquisition-related intangible assets, the majority, SEK 10.8 billion, is related to goodwill. We have a strong liquidity, at the end of the quarter, the available funds amounted to SEK 20.5 billion. As per now, it's SEK 17.2 billion. Looking at the non-operational amortizations ahead of us, the forecast for this fiscal year is close to SEK 6.7 billion. For this quarter, April to June, we expect the amortizations on acquisition-related intangibles to amount to SEK 1,670 million. Worth noting here is that the forecast includes all transactions closed as per 31st of March, but also Gearbox, Easybrain, and Aspyr, who were closed in the beginning of April. To summarize, Johan, we will have SEK 30 billion in amortizations over the coming five years. Yes. Hitting the net profitability EBIT- Yes before the reported EBIT. Yes. As we have a straight-line amortization schedule for acquisition-related amortizations, it's for the coming five years, and then of course, at year six it will be zero. Business areas. Thank you so much, Johan. Thank you, Lars. Looking at the games business area and the financial performance, we are at a trailing 12 months basis, close to SEK 6.5 billion in sales. The quarter again is close to SEK 2 billion. Looking at the balance, new releases, and back catalog, new releases only were 42%, even though we had Valheim in the quarter, so we really had strong back-catalog sales way above SEK 1 billion. The share of digital sales are increasing, driven this quarter partly by Valheim. 89% of the sales were digital in the quarter for the games business area, and on a trailing 12 months basis, we are up to 80%. Owned share titles are now at 62%, and the rest is then publishing titles, also defining Valheim as a publishing title. Organic growth, obviously I'm very pleased this morning to report the full year organic growth of 70%. We have been having a good organic growth the past years. I would like to highlight this morning that of the 160 ongoing game development projects, 2/3 of them are based on either new IPs, entirely new IPs, or IPs that we revitalize that has not been with any new content or games the past five years. We have more than 240 IPs within our group to work on. Still, the bottleneck for us and the rest of the industry is talents and games developers. We still have more of dormant IPs, licenses, and IDs across the group than we have talents to develop this for. Meaning 1/3 of the portfolio of games development are more on a recent established or released IPs. Now looking at each operational group. We have THQ Nordic, that had a stable performance, about SEK 350 million in the quarter. They are at an all-time high on a trailing 12 months basis, as close to SEK 1.8 billion in sales. They had a few titles releasing in the quarter, Monster Jam Steel Titans 2, and Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning on Nintendo Switch. The business mainly was driven by a continued strong performance of Wreckfest, SpongeBob, and Destroy All Humans!, and many others. Glad to report this morning that the Destroy All Humans!, the remake, released last July, has sold now more than 1 million copies, and the remake of SpongeBob: Battle for Bikini Bottom - Rehydrated, releasing in June last year, has sold way more than 2 million copies. Looking ahead, finally, we are just five days to release Biomutant. Biomutant has been something that we have been talking every quarterly since the IPO, more or less. I'm excited about that release, and also happy to get the reports that are above our expectations in terms of pre-orders. The title will be released globally on PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC on May 25th. Also in the quarter, we are releasing an upgraded version of Wreckfest on PlayStation 5, and as well as Destroy All Humans! on Nintendo Switch in the end of the quarter. With that said about the operational performance, I think we have Klemens from Vienna with us on a stream here. Because Klemens, you made some acquisitions a few days ago, and rather than I'm talking about them, I would like you to tell us a bit more. How are you doing in Vienna? Are you playing a bit of "Biomutant" this morning, or? We are playing Biomutant since years. Yeah, we are thrilled that the release is next week, and we are looking forward to how it will be received by the audience finally. Today I think I should talk a little bit about the three acquisitions we made. Yeah the last weeks. I promised you We have three slides here. Here we can. Thank you the slide of Appeal, so please go ahead. Okay. I promised you that I will not spend more than five minutes, although I could talk hours about those amazing studios. First of all, Appeal Studios. The main reason why we acquired Appeal Studios is definitely Yves Grolet, his team of leads as the entire development team in the studio. Those guys go always for the maximum possible. Worth mentioning is also that Yves has worked on five generation of consoles so far. If you remember the early days of console development, you know those guys were handpicked by the platform holders because not everybody was allowed to develop a PlayStation 1 or PlayStation 2 game back in the 1990s. Yves was constantly among those group of developers, and this says something at least. They will work in the future on memorable open world games. They started already, so they have two games in development. One is an internal project based on a THQ Nordic IP, where luckily Appeal Studios is extremely familiar with this IP, and the other project is for another publisher, so it's a third-party project. Yeah, can't wait to reveal the news about this game in development there. Kaiko. We know Peter and the gang of Peter since 2014. They helped us a lot with remasters, remakes, and porting projects. An amazing story maybe to tell about the porting project was definitely Darksiders Warmastered Edition for the Xbox One. It shows also the technical skills of the studio, because it took Peter and his team six weeks to port Darksiders Warmastered Edition from PlayStation 4 to Xbox One, including submission. This is still a benchmark and a record of our porting history within the group. Currently, they work on Fatesworn, which is an add-on to Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning. After they are finalized this one, which is up for release this summer, they work on a sequel of one of our most valuable IPs we have in our portfolio, and it's based on a original THQ IP. I hope I can share some assets in 2022 about this project, but watch out. Last but not least, if you could make a slide turn. Thank you. Massive Miniteam. This studio was founded by Tim, Michael, and Robert, and they worked together with HandyGames since a couple of years now. They helped with also with porting projects, but also with a nice game called Spitlings. It's the first acquisition of HandyGames, which is making THQ Nordic team, a grandmother company, and I guess the right term for Embracer Group would be a great-grandmother company. I'm really thrilled that HandyGames made this move, and set the ratios to growth going forward. They work on internal and external projects at the moment, and the internal project, which I'm really thrilled to tell you, is based on a U.S. license from a major movie TV studio. This project is up for release in 2022, and this will lift HandyGames as well as Massive Miniteam into new spheres. Watch out, this will be an amazing game for the summer season in 2022. That's it. I can talk for hours, but I will save you from too much. Well done. Thank you so much. Really pleased to welcome all the new team members at THQ Nordic and HandyGames. Thank you so much. Good luck. Thank you. remaining five days. Bye-bye. Okay, with that said from THQ Nordic, I'm moving over to our friends at Deep Silver that had a stable performance, reaching SEK 465 million sales in the quarter. On a trailing 12 months basis, they are quite stable at about SEK 2 billion. Releases, the most successful release in the quarter was Supercross 4 from our friends at Milestone. They also released Gods Will Fall during the quarter. The quarter, as usual, was driven by a very strong back catalog of the Metro games, the Kingdom Come: Deliverance, the Saints Row series, Outward, and a continued performance of the Milestone's lineup. Milestone announced their most ambitious game project yet, Hot Wheels Unleashed, that will due for release during the current financial year. I'm pleased to see there has been a great interest from fans of the Hot Wheels online. Our friends at Vertigo, they announced that the co-op first-person title After the Fall will be coming this summer. Really excited to finally have that game coming out. Flying Wild Hog confirmed this morning that they're having a very exciting pipeline with four titles that will be start releasing this financial year. Moving to Stockholm, I'm really happy that Klemens, Andreas, and the team led by Tobias and many others at Starbreeze came to an agreement that Deep Silver will be the publisher of the upcoming Payday 3 for PC and console. All in all, Deep Silver has a very interesting pipeline with some very exciting projects coming out, both this financial year as well as future years. Moving to our friends in Florida, New York, St. Petersburg, and many other places around the world, Saber Interactive, they had a continued performance, SEK 371 million in sales in the quarter. Continued strong performance of SnowRunner and World War Z. Now, SnowRunner we are reporting has sold close to 2 million copies as of end of March. They continued to be very active within the market. The acquisition of Zen Studios closed legally during the quarter, and now during end of April, they released, with really favorable reviews, Star Wars Pinball VR. Also, really happy to see that Aspyr closed early April, and that will help Saber significantly to increase their presence in the U.S. market. Aspyr already released a great remake of the old classic Star Wars: Republic Commando on the PlayStation 4 and Nintendo Switch. SnowRunner, again, released two days ago on the Switch, and finally on Steam. Both versions are the Game of the Year editions, and pleased to see that it's had a good start on Steam. Looking ahead, they're having a very interesting pipeline that is with a lot of big titles. I would say more in later or financial years post the current one. They're having a good pipeline in the current year. Here you can see that the Evil Dead one is the one I can talk about today that are expected during the current financial year. DECA Games had a stable performance, SEK 104 million in the quarter. In the mid-quarter, IUGO and A Thinking Ape, our friends in Vancouver, finally came legally into the group, and we had a bit of revenues from them in the end of the fourth quarter. The original business model of DECA to take care of great mobile games and continue operating them showed a strong performance, for example, here on Zombie Catchers that had a most solid quarter during its seven years lifetime. We briefed this morning about this IDFA change. This is very early, even though it has been announced and implemented. It's still very early, but so far we have not seen any material change in the business, and we are not expecting that in terms of DECA. I'm confident our friends at Easybrain will adapt to that change well, and they're prepared for it for a very long period of time. Moving to Skövde and Stockholm, Coffee Stain, again, is just an amazing performance. The quarterly sales came in at SEK 781 million, which is a 851% increase year-over-year. On a trailing 12 months basis, Coffee Stain's sales are up to SEK 1.2 billion. For the revenue, the main revenue driver was Valheim, but again, a very solid continued performance of Satisfactory and Deep Rock Galactic. They are very busy, and they are having a very interesting pipeline of future projects. The only two that are announced are Midnight Ghost Hunt and Songs of Conquest. Moving to our friends in Karlstad at Amplifier, led by the team in Stockholm. They had their largest studio, Tarsier Studios, releasing Little Nightmares II during the quarter. I was really pleased to see well received by both gamers and critics alike. During the quarter, we actually were able to book a royalty from our publishing, our friends at Bandai Namco, that are the publisher, that have done a great job of publishing this title. During the quarter and announced just a week ago, really happy to welcome FRAME BREAK from Skövde into the group, and I can't wait to see what the future holds for that studio. Amplifier continues to invest. They are really organic growth investments for the long term. They are setting up new studios, hiring talents, and building new IPs. I'm excited what Amplifier and their amazing studios will bring to the group over the coming years. Moving to the partner publishing and film business area, we had a quarter that is very in line with last year, about SEK 400 million. Solid performance of the film business that are increasingly becoming digitally, as well as they have been doing a number of good license deals with TV channels in Germany and Italy. They also launched their own YouTube channel, MovieDome, that has more than 100,000 subscribers the first month. A continued solid performance from our friends at Sola Media in Germany. Looking at the business, we've been stating we are the last man standing within physical distribution, not only because we love and understand and believe in that part of the games industry, also because we think it's a really relevant service to provide both for our internal studios as well as our external partners within the industry. Overall, Embracer Group, and especially Koch Media, are really complementing the industry. That's why I was pleased to see that Koch Media have signed another major game publisher for physical distribution for most countries within Europe. At the same time, we had another business partner moving out with the new releases from the business, and that the publisher are done insourcing that part of the business. The Koch Media physical and partner publishing business are growing. They opened offices in Hong Kong and Tokyo during the period, as well as we have decided to invest in a new European logistic center. It's already existing in Austria, in Höfen, now we are investing a good amount into expanding that capacity. I think we're increasing the capacity with 60%, and with the new robotic systems as well. M&A. Just to recap a bit of numbers. Here you can see on the left hand, the maximum consideration during the past five years. Starting 2017, we're allocating SEK 100 million into acquisitions, led by the acquisition of Experiment 101, the makers behind Biomutant. We have continued building on this strategy. This year so far, now talking calendar year, we have, if you define it as maximum consideration, invested SEK 22 billion into new talents into the group. The absolute majority are investments within business area games, with a few acquisitions within partner publishing and film. Number of deals, we have done 50 deals since the IPO of acquisitions, not counting the assets or IP acquisitions, just counting companies. I don't like to use the word acquisitions, actually, because I see that we more merge with fantastic talents in the industry. Even though the legal term is acquisition, I know that. Looking at the verticals and the bolt-on acquisition mergers, it's a good balance. Last year, for example, we invested SEK 7 billion into the new operating units, here defined as verticals, and SEK 6.3 billion in bolt-on. Sorry for being a bit on these very financial terms when talking about people. Yeah. We continue to work on this topic across the group, both at the parent company, Embracer, here in Karlstad, Stockholm, as well, obviously, across our operating units. We have been talking to at least way over 150 companies since the last quarterly. Currently, we are engaging with more than 20 late-stage talks defined here, some under exclusive LOIs, some we believe that we will welcome to the group if concluded. I would like to restate that acquisitions could happen anytime, and we're trying to move the cycle of the whole business and the parent company away from announcing acquisitions at the quarterly reporting and then to have them more regularly integrated. Okay, Johan, I'm leaving over the SpongeBob slide here. Thank you very much. The sustainability quarterly update. A lot has been done during the quarter within the area, and we are really happy to say that we have done the first global employee survey for Embracer. Also very happy to see that we had a very high response rate from all of the people in the Embracer Group, 74%. Very happy about that. Of course, we are processing the information received, and we will get back with more information around this in our sustainability report, which is part of the annual report. Another achievement during the quarter is that we have done a risk analysis and materiality analysis within the ESG area. This has been done together with an external partner assisting us with this. It has been great work, and the outcome is that we will be able to focus the areas within sustainability or ESG that matters most to all of our different stakeholders. We continue to work with the Ambassador Program. The team there is really focusing on spreading the word of the sustainability framework and also identifying specific actions or initiatives and sharing these across the group. We would like to reiterate our Smarter Business Framework, which is the four pillars that underpins our look and view on sustainability. We have our Business Sense, Solid Work, Great People, and Greener Planet. We really believe that these four pillars, in a good way, also captures what's important for our stakeholders and the company as such, and of course, our employees. Can just highlight that during May, I contributed to the Safer Together fundraiser, donating, sharing knowledge within the really important area of mental health. Lars. Thank you. Sustainability, part of that for me is the culture of gaming, and part of that culture is the legacy of the industry. As announced last quarterly, is part of the culture here at Embracer Group level here in Sweden to build archive of all the fantastic industry products made the past 40 years. Happy to see that we now employed our first guy on board, and he has actually acquired a bit of collections the past quarters or the past month. Now, as of this morning, we're announcing to hire more people to build this archive. Here you can actually see a picture of one of our fantastic collections of Sega products. Really pleased about this, and this give me a bit of joy sometimes in office, as well as many of other people at the parent company. Happy to share more about this in the future. Deep dive, Johan, we defined as non-recurring information. Yes. We start off with looking at an interesting graph. It shows net sales in business area games during the last fiscal years by title. The notion here is to see that we have a real diversified revenue base. Out of the total net sales within business area games of SEK 6.4 billion, top 10 titles amounts to 44%. Even if you look at approximately the top 40 titles, you reach 74% of game sales. Interesting view. Also, I would like to give an update on the IFRS conversion and the regulated market. As communicated a quarter ago, the board of directors decided in mid-February to convert to IFRS and thereby start the process of becoming listed on a regulated market. The overall timeline for the project is estimated to be between 18 and 36 months from February. A lot has been achieved in the quarter. We are very happy to say that we have signed with a senior resource that will be instrumental for the overall process of listing on the regulated market. We have also strengthened the group finance team here in Karlstad with a senior resource as head of financial control. Start officially in June, has already been part of the early stage phases in the IFRS conversion. We made an evaluation and an agreement with an external partner to provide support and expertise throughout this IFRS conversion project. One of the Big Fours, I would imagine. Yes, it is. Yes. Also this quarter, we present you with the project ROI scatter graph, where we look at the contribution in relation to the investment for released games. The sample, as always, includes titles where we have either had sales above SEK 40 million or investments of SEK 40 million. It's roughly a bit more than 30 projects in the sample. Of course, if you look down at 1.0x, that would be the breakeven, where the contribution is equal to the investment. The weighted average for us is 3.3x. If you look at this in terms of return profile, if you have an investment period of maybe two to three years, then you have a return period of two years, the internal rate of return in average for organic investments looks very attractive. It's also why it's the key priority to continue to invest into organic growth. We were presented with a challenge this quarter in the graph. To get all the scatters into the diagram, we needed to adopt the Y-axis here a bit. Yes. Last but not least, we will take time to go through our PPA process. The reason is we got a bit of questions from stakeholders and shareholders the past period. I think it would be great to just revisit the topic of how we're doing a PPA. Basically, it's a five-step process. It starts with number one, where you identify the purchase price. Of course, that will be then including upfront consideration and any conditional consideration. Step number two is to identify the value of what you have purchased, which is the net asset value in the target company. The first step in this is to obtain an opening balance sheet for the target, and that's basically the balance sheet at closing date of transaction according to the target's statutory principles. You perform and document a gap analysis, where you look at the statutory GAAP vis-à-vis the K3 and Embracer GAAP. Next after that, you do adjustments to align the opening balance with K3. In part or when you look at the acquisitions that Embracer makes, it's very common that you would need to look into the recognition of ongoing game development, always taking into account that it needs to fulfill the criteria for capitalization on the K3. Another thing to look at is recognizing completed games development project. They also need to fulfill the criteria of K3 to be able to be capitalized. In that respect, you also need to take into account amortizations that will be related to the specific project. Could be other adjustments as well. If you acquire a company that historically has had a more cash-based accounting, well, then you need to change it to accrual-based accounting. Always when doing this, it's based on materiality and traceability, the availability of historical data. Once that's done, it's step three, four, five, basically calculating the surplus value related to the transaction, allocating the surplus value to other identifiable acquisition-related intangible assets. Last but not least, you will have the residual, which basically will be classified and reported as goodwill. When we look at this, we feel that by following the above five-step process, it's our assessment that the operational EBIT presents a representative picture of Embracer's operational and organic performance. We can have a bit of a deeper look into step number two on this slide, where you recognize ongoing game development. As said earlier, it needs to always fulfill the criteria for capitalization under K3. What you start to do is that you assess the type of commercial agreements that is linked to the relevant projects. Generally speaking, there will be two types of agreements, either an internal development agreement or a work for hire development agreement. For internal development agreements, you should capitalize development expenses during the development period and start amortizations as the development is completed. For work for hire development projects, development expenses will be expensed as incurred, and revenue will be recognized based on the percentage of completion method. Based on these rules, we can conclude that if you have a studio working with work for hire development projects, they will not recognize any intangible assets related to game development. Studios or publishers that fund their own development projects should recognize ongoing game development assets. If you have a publisher that applies K3 and it acquires a studio that is currently working on a project funded by the same publisher, you will have at the closing date, the publisher has already capitalized its investment into development project. Hence, there will be no additional recognition of ongoing game development in the PPA relating to the acquisition of the studio. If you look at the financial year, we have SEK 162 million has been recognized as either ongoing game development or finalized game development in the acquisition that has been closed during 2021. Important here is to recognize that two companies has had important work for hire businesses. One is Saber and the other is Flying Wild Hog. Looking at existing publishing relationships, at least there has been existing publishing relationships with 4A and Purple Lamp. We have also made a simple example of operational EBIT, it's two different cases. The underlying assumptions are the same. Basically, the assumption is that you are developing a game. The expenses are SEK 10 million per year and takes three years to do it. The ROI expected is three times the investment, it's two-thirds in year four and the last third in year five. The assumption is also that you release the game in the beginning of year four. The first case on the top-hand side shows an organic investment and its implication on operational EBIT per year on the left-hand side, and on the balance sheet to the right-hand side. Basically, during the development phase, year one, two, three, it's zero impact on operational EBIT. Once the game is released, you will get the contributions or the net sales from the game, that's also when you start to amortize the development project. The second case shows a situation where the studio publisher is acquired at the end of year two. We also are assuming that the value of the ongoing game development fulfills the criteria of capitalization, and it's thereby recognized in the opening balance through the PPA, which is the yellow column on the lower right-hand graph. What's interesting is that operational profit impact during this time period is the same. You will have a zero impact year one, two, three, and then you will have the same pattern as if it would have been an organic investment. Yes. Thank you so much, Johan. With that said, we would like to walk over to Oscar for a Q&A. Great. Thank you. Let's start the Q&A. I want to start by saying that obviously Embracer is maturing as a company, and we just heard that Embracer is now a great grandmother. What does that make you, Lars? Good question, Oscar. Let's dive into Q4 to start here, and starting with Valheim, same as we did last quarter. 6.8 million units sold, and I would say one of the most played games in the world. What can you say about the guidance of 1 million-1.2 million copies in Q1? Is it conservative? Is it realistic? What do you see for the rest of the year? No. This is a publishing project, so in the respect of the team at Iron Gate and the publishing team at Coffee Stain, obviously I've been talking to them before providing this number, and I'm happy to see it's still performing well on Steam, even though the first craziness in February is obviously on a much lower level now. I think it's hard to give a guidance about this quarter, but I would imagine it's a game that people will enjoy playing not only this year, but for the decade to come. I know the team are working to bring out more content, and there is many other ideas for that game in the future. Keep in mind, and with the respect of our philosophy and strategy of leaving great people doing what they want to do, it's a team of five people. They made an amazing game, so I have the full trust they will continue building on that. I suspect, given the interest in this game, that there must also be interest from console platform owners, from streaming platforms, and what have you. What is the plan in terms of porting to console, new content, and how much is it possible to scale up the team, both internally and also with the support from Coffee Stain and Embracer? I'm quite certain there has been a lot of interest about that game on various platforms. This is not about the short cash grab to just port and do everything as quick as possible. It's all about building a long-term franchise and letting the great people doing it, taking their time. Even though I'm sure there is some short-term-ness you can grab, I think the team have a plan, and they will communicate that plan when they're ready. Yep. Looking at the Q4, the report here, I think what stands out is apart from Coffee Stain’s remarkable performance, I think margins, operating margins and gross margins, starting with gross margins. What is driving the strong gross margin performance? I guess it’s high share of game sales and, I think a record high digital share of sales as well. Johan? Yeah. Oscar, it's of course the favorable product mix shift towards Business Area Games and also that the share of digital is high in the quarter. Also as we mentioned within Koch Film film segment, film has had a solid performance in the quarter. That's the main drivers, also if you look at the specific Business Area Games, we also see that that's a bit better than last year, mainly driven by what we explained. Yep. Great. Just checking, but you spoke a little bit or indicated the gross margins for Valheim of I think 30%-35%, excluding the ownership piece. Is that still the case or? Well, we haven't publicly announced the exact margins in that. I think Coffee Stain has a business model of a publishing margin, and then they invest in the minority into the game studios, and that's how they operate. Iron Gate are in line with that, and I don't think there's change from what I've been stating before. Great. That's clear enough, at least. I think it's quite obvious that you did receive a contribution from profits from associates from Valheim. I guess we should think about it as probably lower contribution in Q1 as it came early. Is that the case? Yeah, we were happy now we had a financial year-end to recognize that. Johan, I don't know if you have more color on that. No. It's recognized and up until the end of March, and then what it will be going forward is basically depending on the performance of the title. Yep. Just briefly on the drivers, apart from Valheim in the quarter, I guess it's quite a broad back-catalog performance. You mentioned Metro, SnowRunner, Wreckfest, and Kingdom Come. Anything that stands out in Q4? No. Well, you saw the slide of the very diverse range of the titles performing. You always see titles like SnowRunner now, Metro, SpongeBob, World War Z, Satisfactory, Deep Rock. There is 10, 20 titles constantly performing every quarter. Obviously, that is driving a stability in the back-catalog revenues. A little bit of a boring question, but other external costs, if I may. Quite low in the quarter, is that due to few releases and quite low marketing spend or anything else? Yeah. It's basically lower marketing spend as there are no or fewer audio releases, and then that's the main driver. Great. Quite a lot of acquisitions announced in conjunction with Q2, I believe it was, which is, I mean, a little bit hard to sort of keep track of. Can you just talk a little bit about, perhaps for you, Johan, about the M&A contribution compared to Q3? What has sort of been added sequentially here? Start with that. You mean in Q4? Yeah, in Q4 compared to Q3. I know you signed- Yeah ...finalized on some acquisitions mid-quarter. Yeah. The acquisition that has been added to the reported numbers for Q4 is basically the ones closed during the quarter, which is ATA and IUGO. Yeah. In the greater scheme of things, it's not any significant revenues. No. Even though every revenue is important. Yep. I think also important here, capitalized development sequentially, not a huge increase compared to what previous acquisitions have sort of added. I guess, is that an effect of these studios partly being more work for hire with less capitalized development? Yes. That's the effect, and we mentioned it in the quarterly report also that specifically for Flying Wild Hog, it's a work-for-hire contract. We actually revisited the PPA. Yeah. During the fourth, Flying Wild Hog was announced in the end of Q3. During the final quarter here, the team has spent a lot of time on looking through and assessing these commercial agreements. It's sometimes difficult, take time. The conclusions, together with external expertise, is that they are work-for-hire contracts. That basically means that what was originally added to ongoing game development in Q3 is not there anymore. Subsequently, you will have an increase in goodwill. You can also see that in the ongoing capitalized development, which didn't increase very much here in Q4. Yeah. Turning over to Q1 and the next fiscal year, starting with the raised guidance, SEK 2.8 billion-SEK 3.3 billion in completed development, which is SEK 300 million higher the range. Is that fully a result of the addition of Aspyr and, more importantly, Gearbox? Mainly driven by that. There is a bit of other additions as well. Okay. There's always additions to the coming periods. If you are early in the financial year, you can still sign publishing projects coming out in the financial year. The later you come into the year, the harder it is to sign new publishing releasing in the same year. We are still in that phase. We are adding new projects for publishing at least that will be releasing in the current financial year. Important to state, now we are providing this guidance, and we had discussions. Now this guidance is based on the best assessment of the management teams across the world and their expectations of their pipelines as of today or yesterday. Yeah, that's how this forecast works. Yep. A little bit more short-term, Q1. I can just start off by saying that it seems like you have a really strong market share on Steam, an important platform right now. With that in mind, you guide for SEK 300 million-SEK 350 million in completed development in Q1, which is relatively low given the size of the company now, and despite, of course, Biomutant. What can you say about the mix there between large and small titles? If you compare that number to the SEK 117 million we had in Q4, it's a quite healthy increase. A good chunk of it is Biomutant, and then there is a number of other releases. Obviously, many of the product releases are not that costly that we are releasing. Obviously, the Switch project they've been working on the past year or so, it's important, but it's obviously not any significant amount. That's why the overall number is what you see here as a bit lower than you expect, but that's the way it is. We're stating we've also been acquiring the past year and years companies that are very efficient, having a quite low cost base and a very high revenue potential of the project. That is also lowering that number of completion value. Yep. Very clear. Biomutant, finally it's time in five days. You wrote in the report and talked about it on stage here, strong pre-orders above management expectations. The key question here is what are the management expectations? Well, this is a title that is also physical. There is an expectation of pre-ordering. We had the Collector's Editions, Atomic Editions, and so on, made for years. Happy to see that are more or less sold out. You should be glad to find one. Happy to see that there seem to be a lot of love in Japan for the game. There is also a healthy addition from pre-orderings in Japan. I'm as excited as most others to see how, first of all, the gamers will enjoy the game. The reviews from gamers obviously will be very important, but also the reviews from our well-respected critics around the world. I will check a lot of reviews coming in and released the night before release. Great. In terms of Metacritic, the critic reviews, and Steam reviews, what is most important? What are you happy with? Any first indications at all? No, I don't want to step ahead here. Stefan and the great team at Experiment have worked 24/7 almost, partly to make this happen. Now all people across the publishing team and Stefan and the team are working with the critics and others to explain the game and talk about the game. It's not my job to sit here to tell anything. To be honest, I don't really have any information about that. I suppose reviews will come out from critics the night before. That's the public information I have. I guess that's correct. Okay, great. A few more questions from me before turning over to some questions from the web here. Also looking at the guidance, turning back to that per quarter, it's notable that I suspect that the largest chunk of the projects in terms of value comes in Q4. First of all, is it correct that at least two AAA releases will come in Q4? Yeah, starting with that. That could be an assumption, Oscar. It's very delicate by me here, and in respect of the philosophy of letting our great teams talking about the projects, and now there's a lot of interest from gamers around the world. In that respect, I like to have them talking when they are ready. Yep. You are definitely guiding for- I'm talking through the numbers, Oscar. Yeah, absolutely. I think it was SEK 1.6 billion in Q4. Assuming that it's two AAA titles, what would be sort of the consideration looking at Q3 versus Q4 for a AAA title in terms of competition, in terms of the volumes of new consoles sold, et cetera? I think obviously I'm pleased to see there is a strong demand of the new consoles, so there will be more consoles on the market. We expect the new level of gaming to be stable and to increase over the coming years. Obviously, that will also help when releasing fantastic projects. In the end of the day, it's all about putting out quality products. Quality comes first. It's really the philosophy. I'm really confident about the pipeline for the year. I've been seeing a lot of these products myself, and we had external companies doing reviews, mock-up reviews, and other things. Yeah, it looks very solid. Okay, great. I see we have some overlapping questions with the webcast here, so I'll go over to that. Starting with a question here from, let's see, Ben May from Berenberg. Is the big Q4 weighted release schedule a function of waiting? Well, actually, I just asked that, so I'll skip that. The second question is that Take-Two indicated in their Q4 on Tuesday night a major new release from Gearbox will come this financial year. Can we make an assumption that this will feature in the larger Q4 period? In respect to Take-Two and Gearbox, I don't really have any comments. I let them speak. I'm just pleased and excited what they're doing together. Great. I'll view that as confirmed. Just kidding. The next question here on the market conditions, I suppose. From Benjamin May again: We have begun to see a decline in U.S. spend on video games in April, given the tough comparable of last year when consumers were staying home. Have you seen any notable trends that would suggest this is continuing or reversing, and do you anticipate this to impact your back catalog growth? I know we had a bump in April, May, and then it came down last year. To be honest, I think we have many titles performing well on the platforms right now, and Easybrain are reporting good performance. It's a bit being in Premium mainly. It's a bit lumpy in that sense. You don't have the data by the minute as you have in free-to-play and mobile. I think those companies could talk more about that thing. In Premium and within Embracer and with all the organic growth we're having, it's all about putting out great quality content. I've been stating I'm expecting us to grow organically solidly this year. That's really the comment I can have on that. Very good. Turning over to a question from Ken Rumph. Hope I pronounced that correctly. Can you comment on the largest projects within the SEK 3 billion guidance this year? Not by name, for instance, the largest in absolute numbers, or the total of the top three, top five, or top 10 games. Any sort of input on that? No, I think I provided guidance previously. We've been talking previously about some big projects in the previous quarterly reporting, there is no change to that. I just see a very wide range of fantastic projects. Obviously we could have projects with quite low investment breaking out, then you have projects the other way around. I'm sorry, Ken Rumph, I don't have a top three guidance here for you. Understood. Turning over to a question from Erik Lindholm-Röjestål from Nordea. With Easybrain performing above management expectations with limited IDFA impact, is it fair to assume that you're leaning towards the higher end of guidance range that you gave in conjunction with the acquisitions? First of all, you need to remember, Easybrain, they are really data-driven and quite conservative. We had an expectation entering with a quite low number in the current quarter and then growing over the year. Now they are a bit above that number. It's not massively, but performing above that number, which really pleases me, obviously, just having them on board. I think the IDFA is super early, and I think the implementation is on a very small amount of phones. It's very early to say, but so far we have not seen any change in the numbers. Yep. I think this is an interesting topic, my impression is that the different players in the ecosystems, consultants, ad agencies, and so forth, are sort of managing to go around the system a bit. The fear is, I guess, that Apple will strike down on that too, which may have a bigger impact in due course. Is that also what you're hearing, or do you have a view there? There is so many different views on this. At the end of the day, if we had a very leading team doing what they're doing, I'm confident they will manage this as good as, or the best as anyone could do. That just gives me confidence about the long term of Easybrain. Great. A question from Nick Dempsey with Barclays, with the amortization flowing through from games released in Q4 2022 in particular, should we expect operational EBIT margins to be clearly lower in full year 2023 than in full year 2022 as it comes late in this current fiscal year? I think it's too early to start talking about those margins. I think in general, when we're looking at the long-term business plans across the group, we see healthy organic growth, not only this current financial year, but also the years thereafter. Yep. I have some questions that were forwarded to me here. In Q3 2020, I believe, the report, it was mentioned that Embracer Group would be working towards being listed on a regulated exchange. What exchanges are being discussed? Does the company already meet the regulatory requirements of the exchanges being discussed, and where are you on the timeline there? It's quite a long time period. Any update there? I think the main focus right now is the IFRS project and the financial control. I've been talking to Nasdaq, and we now hired a senior resource coming in. I'm confident we will find its way. I'm interested to talk to the other stock exchanges and to have a discussion whether it's relevant to have a dual listing. In the end of the day, I think Stockholm would be the main. That's my assumption, but I'm open-minded as always. It's many factors. One factor, I would like to talk to our shareholders about this, what they think. It's also about the liquidity of the share. If you split it to too many stock exchanges, that could hurt you. Also our stakeholders outside Sweden, shareholders, but also the entrepreneurs. Remember, more than half the company's owned by the entrepreneurs and creators that have joined the group, and perhaps there is a demand and wish to have local public market trading shares as well. There's many factors, and we will take our time to do this the best absolute way we can. Understood. Another question here. Someone wondering what's happening with all the content deals that are done within the group and how these are recognized as revenue. Is the whole sum recognized immediately when a game is released, or do you portion it out over, I guess, the contract length? Johan. You need to assess the individual agreement to see if you fulfill the criteria of being able to recognize this as revenue. Yeah, the answer is that it depends. One of the criteria is that you need to fulfill the performance obligations to be able to recognize your revenue. You need to assess if you have done that, and that depends on each individual agreement. For example, just to add on there, if you sign a, let's say, 12-month agreement with Epic Games, I suppose there are a lot of minimum guarantee agreements. Would that be recognized upfront or over time, or does that depend as well? Of course, you need to look into the specific agreement relating to that specific game. In general, if you have a minimum guarantee, it would be recognized over the time period. Okay. Not upfront. Got it. Another question here on Flying Wild Hog. You went through this a bit, but maybe could be good to go into detail. What happened to the company's project on the balance sheet? Why is SEK 29 million going to IP rights and other, and SEK 96 million to goodwill? Yeah. I think you touched on it earlier, but in the preliminary PPA that we had. It was closed late in Q3. In the preliminary PPA we had there, the agreements or the development projects were deemed to be internal development projects at that time, and the effect was minimum because it was late closing in Q3. Now as the work has been through the onboarding, when you work with the PPA, the assessment is that these agreements are work-for-hire agreements. If it's a work-for-hire agreement, you cannot capitalize an intangible asset in terms of ongoing game development. Then we need to remove it, and it'll be goodwill. Great. That means going forward, the same deals or agreements will not be capitalized either going forward? Yeah. Yeah. As you said, of course, then there is no capitalization in Q4 related to that because you don't capitalize the development spend. Instead, you expense it as it occurs, and you recognize the development income according to the percentage of completion method. Very clear. Thank you. We have a question from Matti Littunen at Bernstein. Thank you for the games cost value guidance by quarter. Could you tell us roughly how much Biomutant is of the Q1 total? No, I can't tell you exactly, but it's a healthy share of it. Okay, I think we'll have to settle for that. We discussed that. On M&A, back to my questions now, you've stopped announcing acquisitions in conjunction with reports, so more focus on the report. We're trying to avoid it, to focus on the actual report rather than the M&A announcement. Interesting. Going forward. Looking at the comments on M&A, what can you say about the mix there between new potential operating units in the group and smaller sort of add-on acquisitions in the operating units? No, it's hard to give you a call on that. I think in general, most transactions you will see is when we merge with game developers and bolt-ons to the existing operating units, building for the future. We've been talking to quite a few very sizable potential new verticals during the past period. Of that mentioned 20+ dialogues, there is a wide range on that 20. I don't want to provide more color on that. Okay. The comments in the report about being patient, about focusing on quality first, also in M&A. What do you want to say? What do you mean really there about that? I think for us, it's important to have quality in the process. Due diligence, SPA, dialogue, talking to the team, assessment of the games development pipelines, understanding the business. That needs to take some time. There is a lot of stakeholders, some shareholders pushing, "Why don't you do more deals?" This is not about doing deals every morning. It's about the decade to come. We need to really get together with the right company, and we need to have the right processes. Now having a more sizable business than we had five years ago, it's important that Johan and the team also having a good process to integrate all this. They've done a fantastic job, and I'm really happy now to hear the green lights from also external parties about the processes you've been doing and auditing and all that. I don't want to destroy that by just throwing things in here overnight. Understood. Then had a question from the web there on Gearbox and Take-Two. Looking at the movie instead, I saw that it's supposedly coming out in 2022, the Borderlands movie. In general, is it high potential to release a game in conjunction with a movie coming out? Is that reasonable given that the last Borderlands game was- I know both the Gearbox and Take-Two has a lot of great fans for the IP and a big love for the IP. I will let them communicate their plans whenever. In the respect of them, that's the operating thing for them to communicate. It hasn't gone very long since the acquisitions were confirmed or closed. What can you say about the dialogue between the different studios and groups, and how are the plans progressing and potential synergies as well? Well, again, I think we are one of the companies that has the most synergies within the industry. That's because most of the mergers and acquisitions are done within each operating units that are fully integrated. Across the group, there are more ongoing projects than ever, I would say. Really good dialogues about both technology, publishing and distribution, marketing, business intelligence. I think that is a real interesting upside or potential over the coming decade, what the wider ecosystem of Embracer could do, both financially for us, but also for everyone joining. I think that why it makes sense to continue our strategy to build a greater and bigger company is the more fantastic people and companies and talents we get on board, the more it makes sense to join. On that note, are you seeing an impact from the Gearbox acquisition, Easybrain, and Aspyr as well in discussions? Yeah, sure. Randy and the team is way well into the discussions. Yes. Great. The notable signing for Koch Media's partner publishing business announced, I think it was yesterday, on Twitter at least, Activision Blizzard for most EMEA markets, excluding Italy and U.K. What is the impact of that, and some context as well, if possible? I think Koch and Klemens have been talking about consolidation in terms of some bigger players start using their services over time, and he talked about that already three years ago, and I'm pleased to see that start happening now. Doing such a thing is a big thing. It will take a while until such a thing is fully integrated and it's happening. Again, this is a long-term thing. It's a long-term relationship. It's not about rushing in this quarter. I think with patience, you will see a gradual top-line revenue coming in from potentially that contract, but other contracts in the future. At the same time, we had another partner moving out because they were insourcing. I think the margins mix between them. Over time, Klemens have been stating you could see the growth. I've been stating to you, Oscar, and the market here, we see a stable partner publishing business. I think as a financial analyst, you should not be carried away. With that said, I expect that some of the titles Activision Blizzard has is maybe bigger than Codemasters, for example. Is that a fair assumption, or is there anything missing there? In the respect of the partners, I don't want to talk about titles. In terms of phasing during a typical year, I guess the seasonality may change a little bit from F1 titles coming out over the summer to perhaps Call of Duty being a key title in fiscal Q3, for example. Again, I don't want to talk about the details. I think that's why we have such brilliant people like you and other analysts to do this work. Fair enough. Let's see if we have any more questions from the web. An interesting short video with, or talk by Klemens on video link there. Any hints on Kaiko's project at all you want to share? One of the biggest IPs in THQ? Kaiko is a well-trusted partner to the team since seven years. I'm sure they're interesting things to them. I don't have anything more to disclose. Sorry, Oscar. Understood. Looking a bit further out, we have the guidance for this fiscal year coming now, which seems quite exciting. What can you say about the coming years if you compare it to this year? Should we expect higher value of completed development, or should this be seen as a remarkable year in terms of releases? The thing I've been stating, we see on top line a healthy organic growth the current year, and I'm expecting that organic growth to continue the years to come. I think that's the color I can give you at the moment. Okay, and I think actually another question here. Just an update on the progress of acquired companies. I think one important example being Saber Interactive. If you could just talk a little bit about how when you acquire a company, how you sort of change the focus from work for hire to internal development and what effects that have over time, and just do that for some key acquisitions would be interesting to hear. No, every company joining are accessing the ecosystem and the smorgasbord of optionalities, how they potentially could change their business, how they could use synergies, how they can use publishing capacities. At the same time, with respect of their culture, mindset, and entrepreneurship, they have the operational freedom if they want to continue working with external parties, and if they want to continue working with our fantastic external work-for-hire clients, it's really their decision. I'm really pleased to see the performance of all our companies post-integration. Also, it's important to say that they are different in mindset and how they operate and the business models. I don't believe in that I should tell them, "Here's the way you should operate. It's my way or no way." That is not the way I operate. Great. I think time to wrap it up. Yeah. I'll ask a final question from the web here, quite classic question. Where do you see yourself and Embracer in 10 years? The most common question, actually, since the IPO. I've been stating since the IPO, I want to build a sizable business with a long-term mindset, complementing the industry, with a good business, with strong financials, with stability, and diverse. I think we are on that path, and God knows what that path will look like in 10 years. I think it's important as an operator and an entrepreneur to make the right daily decisions along the way. In my experience, obviously, I have in mind where I'm going and where we are going as a group. You need to be adaptive and flexible, and there is a lot of things happening within the industry. I was stating, for example, this morning that realizing that the economic value of the games released past year was about SEK 100 million, but the platform holders take SEK 200 million. Is that fair, or is it over time? I think there's things that hopefully will play our way as content creators over the coming decade. I would like to highlight that this morning. If part of that fees could come to create greater games for our fantastic gamers and customers, that is really what I would like to see. Great. I think that's a good ending note. Yeah, thank you, everyone, for listening in. That's it for the Q4 presentation. Thank you. Okay. Thank you.