Welcome to the Green Landscaping Group AB Q2 presentation 2025. For the first part of the presentation, participants will be in listen-only mode. During the questions and answers session, participants are able to ask questions by dialing #KEY5 on their telephone keypad. Now, I will hand the conference over to the CEO, Johan Nordström, and CFO, Marcus Holmström. Please go ahead. Thank you, and welcome to today's earnings call. As mentioned, my name is Johan Nordström, and I'm joined with our CFO, Marcus Holmström, who will manage the financial section of this presentation in a few minutes. Before we dive into the presentation per se, let me just give a high-level pitch on how we look upon the second quarter and put that into context. We started the year with a weak Q1, given the lack of winter and snow removal activities. This, of course, had a spillover effect in the month of April, which meant that we had slightly lower revenue and profitability. It did have a negative impact on our cash flow, as well as the activities we do in the first quarter. They are invoiced in that quarter, but typically, we do receive payment in the beginning of the second quarter. That had a negative effect on our leverage at the end of the day. Beginning in May, things picked up quite significantly. I would say that both May and June came in according to our expected levels, and this is also the high season where we start up with the landscaping activities on a big scale. If you look upon the market as a whole, we can still see that there are headwinds in the marketplace. It hasn't really picked up. When we talk to the entrepreneurs about their outlook, they are positive, as always, and that's a good thing. Nonetheless, from our perspective, I would say that the market is trending sideways so far this year. Our margin expansion activities in Sweden are progressing according to plan. That's where we have discontinuing of a couple of our operations and unprofitable customer contracts and such. That is a work that has been ongoing for some time, and I assume this will have full effect towards the end of the year. As we enter in 2026, I do expect the profit margins in Sweden to increase from current levels. There are a couple of other things in the quarter that I would like to highlight. First of all, I would say the improved profit margins in our Finnish operations are quite substantial. I'm happy to see that Finland is back on track. That looks really promising to us. We also issued our first bond in the second quarter, and that has diversified our financing in a good way. It gives us options as we move into the future. Thirdly, of course, that's the M&A activity, as we have invested in one company that is Wagner, in the southeast of Berlin. Today, we announced our second investment this year, and that is Tesmo and Sons in the Hanover area. With these two investments alone, we're actually halfway through our M&A ambition for the year, as our ambition is to acquire around SEK 80- 100 million. These companies being slightly bigger with a good profit margin means that we are, as I said, about 50% down the road in terms of the M&A activities, and that's really good. Now let's move into the presentation. If we move into the slide there about Green Landscaping Group AB, I assume that most of you are aware of the company. If you look upon the market we are active in, it's outdoor services that we provide. The market per se is a very big market. It's a fairly stable market, and of course, there are favorable macro trends in it. Being active in this type of market will enable us to choose the type of services we provide and the type of customers we provide. That gives us room to maneuver, so to say. Also, for the M&A side of things, if you have a lot of companies in different regions to choose from, you have a large landscape. If you want to be a serial acquirer, that is really important. Applying the right business model is really about the three levers that we talk about if you want to be a successful serial acquirer. You need to have organic growth, you look upon the acquired growth, and you look upon margin expansions. How do you level this out? From my perspective, organic growth is probably the one that we have focused least upon historically. As we move forward, we will probably place some more emphasis on it, even though we don't want to grow too fast organically in that area. Acquired growth, we have been acquiring companies for the last five, six years, and I think we have gained some experience on what to look for and what to avoid. That is pretty much moving along according to plan, I would say. Then, of course, it's about elevating our margins. The industrial average is about 5%. We are roughly at 8%, and we are on a positive trend. Our ambition is, of course, to continue to improve and expand our profit margins. I think that concludes to a large extent the first slide there about the active market, the business model we have chosen, and of course, the M&A strategy that we have been working on. Now, looking upon the rolling 12 months, net sales was to some extent, I would say, almost unchanged to SEK 6.1 billion, where we had an organic growth of - 7%. Acquisitions contributed by 9%, and then we had a negative impact on the exchange rate by a - 2%. The EBITDA decreased by 8% to SEK 479 million, and the margin went down from 8.5%- 7.8%. Cash flow from operating activities, there we came in at a very strong SEK 464 million versus SEK 276 million. That's a significant improvement in the last three or four quarters, as we can see. We have also had some extra activities on that one. Of course, we saw a while back that the cash flow was a bit weak. We have focused on that one for almost a year now, making sure that we actually turn the EBITDA into cash. M&A activities, we have so far for the rolling 12 months completed seven investments. Overall, when I look upon the numbers, given the weak Q1 in particular, I'm not overly excited about the outcome, even though it is related to the Q1 and the lack of winter and the market headwinds. It could be better. The performance in Sweden, and in particular Finland, is improving. We also see a stable situation in Germany, even though that is a new market for us. Given the headwinds in the Q1, it's moving along, I would say, pretty much according to plan. If I move on to the second quarter of this year, we can see that the net sales decreased by 3% to SEK 1.6 billion, and we have a negative organic growth by 9%. As I said, that is a month of April that came in weaker than expected. Also, as we are working on expanding our margins, we can see a slight negative impact from those activities. Then it's market headwinds. EBITDA, we saw an increase of 1% to SEK 145 million. Basically, we are having a slightly slower or negative organic growth, while we are flat or improving on the profit margins. The margins there are 9% versus the 8.7% we had a year ago. Cash flow, they came in at minus SEK 78 million versus minus SEK 11 million. The second quarter, that is a quarter where we start with the landscaping activities, and that means that we are building up capacity to execute those ones. That ties up capital in the second quarter. Typically, we receive that cash back in the third and the fourth quarter. That is cash positive for us. This is a normal trend we have. The negative number is slightly bigger than we would have expected, and that comes from the negative impact on the Q1, the winter activities that we typically invoice in Q1, and then we receive that cash in the second quarter. If you look upon the financial leverage, we are at 2.9x. Slightly higher than our financial plan, but not significantly higher, I would say. Typically, that's a trend we have over the year that it goes up in the second quarter, and then we have a deleverage going on for the remainder of the quarters during the year. Also, for the second quarter, we completed one investment in the second quarter, and we also communicated one after the end of the second quarter today. As I did mention, our ambition is to invest or to acquire about SEK 80 million- SEK 100 million. Typically, we say that the sweet spot company for us is to have a revenue of SEK 100 million at a 10% margin. That's how we communicate 8 to 10 companies per year. We have actually achieved the SEK 50 million or in that neighborhood of acquired EBITDA in two companies this year. That is really strong. I like those companies and do welcome them being a part of the group. The long-term performance of the company, it means we have been growing significantly for quite some time, and now it's slowing down. Right now, our three-year CAGR in terms of revenue is about 8%- 9%, and the EBITDA growth is about 5%. To some extent, there are market headwinds in the winter, as I have been saying, that that's impacting those numbers. We're still a growing company and are having an active M&A agenda. Stable market and right business model, that's what I referred to earlier, that we are active in a very big market with long-term contracts. We have positive megatrends and so forth in the market. Also, it's a fairly low cyclicality in the market we are active in. Moving on to Sweden for the rolling 12 months, we saw a decline in net sales of 12% to SEK 2.5 billion and a 38% decrease of EBITDA. That means that we are, let's say, the winter impact and the margin expansion activities in Sweden are clearly seen for the rolling 12 months. While the second quarter, there we see that the net sales decreased by 9%, but we have a significantly lower decrease in the profitability. The profit margin came in at 5.5% in the second quarter versus 5.7% in the comparable quarter. There is an effect of mild winter in the beginning of the quarter, but otherwise, I would say that the margin expansion, margin improvement activities are still going on and active in Sweden and Norway. For the rolling 12 months, we see that we have a decrease of net sales by 2%, and organic growth is actually quite low. I assume it should be higher given the winter activities, but actually, it's down 3%. We have a 5% positive contribution from M&A activities. There is an okay performance going on in Norway. There is a decline in the EBITDA of 22%, meaning that the profit margin actually has come down from 9.9% to -7.9%. That is to a large extent related to the winter activities. In the second quarter, we can see declining sales by 7% and also a decrease by 30% on the EBITDA. I would say that in Norway, the business condition for landscaping is in line with the preceding quarters. In the markets we are in, I would say that Norway right now is probably the market where we have the biggest headwinds. Sweden and Finland are moving along in a, I would say, a better way from what we hear from our entrepreneurs. Of course, also Germany and Lithuania are moving along nicely. Norway is the one we are monitoring at this point of time, how we can grow that business and also how we can be slightly less winter-dependent as we saw in the first quarter. That is the activities we have in Norway. As we move over to other Europe, this is the focus area for us in terms of the M&A growth we have. We have an active M&A agenda in Europe. For the rolling 12 months, we see that the sales are increasing by a hefty 52% to SEK 1.1 billion. That is a very fast growth we see in Germany. Organically, even though the German market has been in, I would say, a tough market situation for the last two or three years, we actually see that the organic growth is a negative one. That is really good. The EBITDA, of course, has increased by 48% to SEK 227 million with an extremely strong profit margin of 19.3%. In the second quarter, we saw that sales increased by 24% to SEK 333 million. We also saw a large increase in EBITDA, and again, with a very strong profit margin of 19.5%. Even though we don't have the winter activities in Germany, it could be good to know that they have a low season in the first quarter as they have less landscaping activities. You have their Christmas breaks and stuff. That means that typically the first quarter is low season, even though they don't have the winter activities in Germany in general. Again, we can see that in other Europe that you have the Finnish companies who are improving their profit margins, and that's really good. We have strong development in other Europe. Now, moving on to the companies that we have invested in. The first one is Wagner. They are located in the southeast of Berlin in that area. That's where they're operating in. I would say it's a typical landscaping company. They do general contracting work. It's a company that was founded back in 2007. They have an annual revenue of about €11 million, and profit margin is higher than the group average. We do welcome that company being part of the group, and it also means that we're getting a couple of companies in the neighborhood of Berlin. We're starting to see us building a cluster as well in that region. Moving on to the latest one that we announced today, this is Tesmo and Sons. They are based in Hanover. It's a typical landscaping company who does similar work to what Wagner is doing, and that's the majority of the companies in Germany. That's the type of work they are doing. This is a company that was founded by the father back in 1967, and they operate in the Hanover area. They do the classic landscaping part of it. That's earthwork, drainage. There's a picture of a private garden there. That's a very small proportion of their business. They're basically a business-to-business company. It's a fairly substantial company with a revenue of about €16 million. Again, it's a company who has a higher profit margin than the group average. We do welcome Tesmo and the employees of that company to be part of the Green Landscaping Group. I think that concludes my part of the presentation, and then I'd love to hand over to Marcus, who will walk you through the financials. Thank you, Johan. As I said, I will cover the main financials and selecting a few on this slide. As Johan already mentioned, Q2 showed net sales of SEK 1.6 billion, bringing our rolling 12 months to SEK 6.2 billion, resulting in a flat growth in the rolling 12 months. EBITDA in the second quarter came in at SEK 145 million, which was largely in line with last year, but the margin was slightly better at 9.0%. The financial result in segment Sweden and Norway was negatively impacted by continued challenge in the market, but also effects from the mild winter in the start of the quarter. The activity levels gradually increased throughout the quarter. Segment Other Europe delivered a positive performance and positive development, specifically in the Finnish operation. Johan also mentioned the development on the cash flow side. Following several strong cash flow quarters in a row, we came out slightly below the seasonal expectation on working capital development in Q2, much due to the weak Q1 we had, resulting in a cash flow from operating activities at negative SEK 78 million compared to negative SEK 11 million last year, which drove financial leverage up to 2.9x in the quarter. Order backlog increased sequentially to SEK 7.6 billion, but was lower than last year. Please have in mind that the size tends to fluctuate between the quarters and should therefore not be used as a short-term leading indicator. Going to bottom lines, earnings per share in the quarter was up 11% to SEK 1.15 compared to SEK 1.04 last year. Digging a bit more into the cash flow side of things, as I said, following several strong cash flow quarters in a row, cash flow from operating activities amounted to negative SEK 78 million, which was due to the low activity level during the winter season, and that impacted us here now in Q2. As the activity level gradually increased during the quarter, it impacted our net working capital going out the quarter. We expect, as the seasonal cash flow develops over the year, that we will have a positive contribution in Q3 and Q4. Also mentioning our rolling 12 months cash flow being SEK 464 million compared to SEK 276 million last year. Cash flow and working capital has been and will continue to be a focus item for us, and we continue to address actions where needed. Looking at cash flow bridge in the quarter, operating activities negative SEK 78 million. We completed one acquisition in the form of Wagner, which was warmly welcomed to the group and also paid out earnout considerations, totaling a cash flow from investing activities of negative SEK 97 million. We had also CapEx and other lease amortization, which was in line with traditional quarterly levels, negative SEK 67 million. We also issued bonds during the quarter and diversified our funding, and we'll come back to that. The net proceeds for that was positive SEK 495 million. In order to optimize our liquidity position, we used some surplus cash generated from the bond and amortized our revolving credit facility in order to not pay too much of available cash position, totaling our cash flow at minus SEK 82 million in the quarter. Financial leverage and our financial net debt increased to SEK 2.4 billion, and the leverage increased to 2.9 times compared to 2.7 last year. We still have headroom to our financial covenant in the financing agreement. Steady state from here would mean that we would be deleveraging Q3 and Q4 based on our seasonal cash flow. Looking at our loan maturity profile, we can see that we, as I said, have SEK 1.4 billion in total net debt in the quarter. We issued bonds, which broaden our financing base and provide us with additional flexibility going forward. As you can see in the maturity profile, we also will, during the second half of this year, refinance our banking debt. That dialogue has already been initiated with our banks and is moving along positively. The new bond that we issued in the quarter was well received and will mature in December 2028. Concluding my end of this presentation, looking at our financial targets, as I said, in rolling 12 months, we have a flat growth, heavily impacted by the effects we saw in Q1 with the mild winter. On EBITDA level, we're slightly below SEK 7.8 million, which also is impacted by the weak Q1 we had, but profitability was in line and slightly better in relative terms now in Q2. Financial leverage at 2.9 times, which is higher than the target. As I said, steady state from here, with our operating cash flow, we should deleverage towards our target at the end of the year. Our fourth financial target when it comes to dividend, and in line with previous years, the AGM on May 9 decided to not distribute any dividend for fiscal year 2024. With that said, I will leave it back to you, Johan. Thank you. Just a final remark there, as we said that we started the year on a weak side with significantly less snow removal activities. We had a weak Q1. We had some spillover effect that had, I would say, a negative impact on the month of April. From there on, I think the activity level did pick up during the month of May and June. That is a high season for us. Those months actually came in pretty much as expected. We are talking about the market headwinds and so forth. Yes, there are market headwinds, but also we have to keep in mind that our market is quite stable. Overall, yes, there's a negative impact on the market, but on the other hand, there's a stability in the market. We are talking about the margin improvement in Sweden going on, and those are progressing according to plan. I'm really happy to see what's going on there. I did highlight the improvement we see in Finland, what is going on there. As I did mention, and as Marcus came back to that, it's a bond and the two acquisitions we've done so far in this year. As I said, I'm not so happy about the financial outcome, but really what we're doing inside the company will lead us to a good place as we will continue throughout this year. By that, I think that concludes the presentation per se, and then we open up for questions. If you wish to ask a question, please dial #KEY5 on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial #KEY6 on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Dan Johansen from SEB. Please go ahead. Hope we're through afternoon. Johan and Marcus, yeah, a couple of questions from my side. Spillover effects here from the mild winter in Sweden and Norway, just so I understand correctly. Is that because you started doing some preparatory work already during Q1? That's difficult to hear because right now we are ready to open up for questions. Hi, Johan and Marcus, can you hear me? We actually can't hear anything here. Can you hear me now? The next question comes from Alexander Silvestrov from Pareto Securities. Please go ahead. Good afternoon, guys. Can you hear me? Okay, hello. Can you hear me? Hello, guys. This is the operator. We have a little bit of a technical issue. Please wait a little bit. Hello, let's try again here. Can you hear me? Yeah, we can hear you. We apologize for this one. Okay, yeah, no worries. Starting off here with my first question on the organic growth. You mentioned that it picked up quite significantly in May and June. Could you please break out the organic growth that you saw in those months? That's not the data we have the ability to disclose at this point of time. No, sorry, it's a quarter per se that we are reporting. As you mentioned that you were quite happy. Yeah, it came in according to our expectations in the month of May and in the month of June that we, given the previous year's development, and then we, of course, as you do, add on the acquired companies into it, then we had an expected number and that we saw that happening. The weak performance was particularly in the month of April, not in May and June. Okay, did you have a positive expectation for organic growth for May and June? We had a slightly positive trend during the quarter, yes. Okay, moving on here to the acquired contribution and then looking at the acquired contribution to EBITDA. At least, to my estimates, it was softer than expected. I am also wondering here if this was sort of according to your budget or if it also was softer than you had anticipated. If you had seen any margin pressure in the acquired companies. Yeah. I didn't really catch the first part of your question there. Can you please repeat that one? Yeah, looking at the acquired contribution to EBITDA, so contribution from acquisitions, it was softer than we expected. Just asking if it was softer than you expected as well, and if you have seen any margin pressure in the acquired companies that you acquired. The answer is actually that the acquired companies came in according to our expectations pretty much. That was pretty much in line with what we had expected. Okay, that's clear. Just looking at the different markets, you talk about sort of the business conditions in Norway being in line with previous quarters. Here we saw a -10%, right? I guess most of it is explained by April then. Given that you had H2 growth of 9% and 3% respectively, is that what you are referring to in terms of sort of normal business conditions, that you are at at least maybe 3% organically? We have, if I compare Sweden, that's just off my head here. If I compare the organic growth, we have been focusing quite significantly on improving the situation of the profit margin in Sweden. When you do that one, you don't want to see a too high organic growth at that point of time. In Norway, we have had a baseline of a higher organic growth compared to Sweden. Even though there are headlines, we still see that there has been organic growth going on in Norway at the same time as they were negatively impacted by a very weak winter in Norway. The first quarter did hit the operations in Norway quite hard, I would say, but they have had a higher baseline organic growth historically than we have had in Sweden. Okay, thanks for that. A follow-up on the margin performance in Sweden. Just wondering why the margin profile isn't picking up given that the unprofitable contract has been exited. You mentioned now that you see margins improving in 2026. Previously, I think you talked about H2. Has this been postponed or have I just misunderstood? No, not really from my perspective. It's probably my wording studies. What I expect, what we're basically saying is that when we are at the beginning of 2026, then we should have completed the majority of all the activities, meaning I should basically see the full effect of the activities we are doing. I do expect us to see a gradual impact during H2, in particular in the fourth quarter. It will be a gradual increase of profit margin year over year. If you compare the quarter, you have to clean out for the Q1 because you can't compare the rolling 12 months as you have a Q1 to deal with in this year. If you compare the performance in the third quarter and in the fourth quarter of this year to last year, yes, my expectations are that we should see improved profit margins going on in Sweden. Okay, that's very helpful. If that was the question, then as you move into January 2026, of course we should have more or less the full effect of the majority of those activities to be shown for. Yeah, okay. Yeah, that's crystal clear. Thanks. Thank you. Maybe just two last ones on M&A. I think you mentioned that you had SEK 50 million in acquired EBITDA now from the two last acquisitions. Just running the math here, it looks like it's a 16% EBITDA margin for those entities. Could you confirm that? We typically close that number, but the problems I have is that we typically, when we communicate the ambition level of how many companies, it's actually how much EBITDA do we plan to acquire during the course of the year. We say the sweet spot company, as I said, is SEK 100 million at a 10% profit margin. That means 8- 10 companies. In reality, that means SEK 80- 100 million to be acquired. As we have made two bigger acquisitions so far this year at a higher profit margin, I'm not totally sure we're going to end up with 8- 10 companies. I think we're going to be more careful on that one because if I'm already at 50% by two companies, then I end up, how do I communicate that to the market? That's the situation I'm in. If I say I have the ambition of SEK 80- 100 million EBITDA and I've done SEK 50 million on that one and you know the revenue, then you can backtrack the profit margin. Yeah, it is what it is. That's really helpful. These are really great companies to begin with. I'm happy that they are coming aboard. I do prefer slightly bigger acquisitions as well because they do have a tendency of having a better structure internally in terms of how they are structuring calculation, bidding, project management, and so forth. It is not down to one entrepreneur. If you have like a SEK 40 million company in revenue, then it's the entrepreneur who basically does everything. If you are running a SEK 150 million, you need typically three to four skilled project leaders. You need to have a slightly higher level of order in those companies, so they are more resilient. I'm really happy with that one. Gotcha. Last one from me, then I'll jump back into the queue. Just following up here, adding another SEK 50 million in EBITDA through M&A with leverage at 2.98x EBITDA. Is that realistic? Yes. In your perspective? Yes. Yeah, okay. Nice one. That's it for me. Okay, super. Thank you. The next question comes from Carl-Johan Bonnevere from DNB Markets. Please go ahead. Yes, good afternoon, Johan and Magnus. Just to pick your brain a little on the snow effect that transpired into Q2. I think a lot of us might have thought that, say, the weak snow condition might have allowed for an earlier start to maybe normal kind of summer activities. How does that transpire in reality? To some extent, I was surprised as well because I was actually thinking the same as you did. As we don't have snow, we should have moved into the green season already by ending March. We should have a head start in the quarter, not being negatively impacted by the winter. As it turned out, the companies in northern Sweden and also in Norway weren't able to do that to the extent that we had anticipated. That ended up in, so they weren't ahead of schedule. That's what I'm saying. I thought they should, actually as you did, and that did not turn out to be the case. Separately from that, you have the high invoice going on in Q1 when you have the snow activities, and then you have a negative impact on the cash flow in the first quarter because over the year, we typically have a higher leverage, let's say, in the second quarter as we tie up more working capital. That is to some extent reduced by money coming in on paid invoices in the month of April. Of course, that didn't happen as well. That's a separate issue going on there. That meant we came in at a slightly higher leverage than expected. That is actually slightly higher than expected. It's not really a big number from our expectations for the second quarter. Excellent. Thanks for the extra color there. The other part of this is, I guess, there is a thesis then when money is saved on snow removal in the first quarter, that part of the budget might come back in other types of projects in the second half. When would you normally see those kinds of budget thinkings coming through from the local municipalities, if it happens? It happens. Again, we can't guarantee that it's going to happen. Typically, what goes on in the fourth quarter, somewhere in the middle of the fourth quarter, we sit down, our entrepreneurs sit down with the customers, and they basically go through the situation on how much do we have in budget, how much have we used so far, what's the accrued rate, and how much money do we have left before year end, and what activities can we offer to the customers in the month of, let's say, half month of November and in the month of December. That's typically when we do those types of, are having those types of budget discussions with the customers. Excellent. A proactive discussion basically coming up in September, October in that respect. No, it's too early because they typically have that towards the end of the year. I would say in the month of October or November, to my experience, that's when we have that discussion. Excellent. Just a question also on the business combination note in the report. Did you pay for the Wagner acquisition fully out in this quarter, or is there more to come? Otherwise, it looks to be a very nice price tag for that acquisition. Pass. Okay, thank you. Thank you very much. All the best out there. Okay, thank you very much. The next question comes from Julia Sunville from ABG Sundal Collier. Please go ahead. Yes, hello, and good afternoon. Just one question from my side. It's on the Finnish operation and the improvements there. Is this on the market improvements, or is it internal measures that have improved? No, thank you for the question. Hello, Julia. The market conditions overall are stable, I would say. There are no major changes in the macro environment. Finland has been, I won't say suffering badly, but in the markets we're in, I would say Finland is the most troublesome market we have had within the group. We actually don't see any significant change in the market conditions in Finland. We did change the Regional Manager and took one of our successful Managing Directors and placed him in charge. He started to do some changes, and all of a sudden we have, I would say, quite a significant change in profit in those companies in Finland. I'm really excited about what they've done. Okay, perfect. That was all from my side. Okay, thank you. Thank you. There are no more questions at this time. I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments. Okay, I don't have much to add to this one. I think we are moving in the right direction. As I said, we like the market we're in. We like the companies. We like the business model we're operating under. I'm really looking forward to what the future will come or what type of future that will come here for the remainder of the year, in particular as we're moving into 2026. We don't have to have the Q1 in the rolling 12 numbers because you have to have that one for a year before it goes away. Otherwise, I think it's moving along in the right direction, even though the numbers are weak in the second quarter. No question about that one. The leverage might be on the high side, according to some opinions, from my opinion when I look upon the trend over the year, because we typically are peaking in the second quarter. Given the type of profit margin we have and the type of business we're operating under, that is no major concern from my perspective. I don't see that being a hinder or difficult to continue to invest in other companies for the remainder of the year. From that perspective, we're going to continue to do what we do and to improve. That's what it's all about. Great. Thank you all for listening in and have a nice summer. Yeah, have a nice vacation, everybody. Thank you.