Good afternoon, welcome to the interim report presentation for the Holmen Group. It's especially nice to see you actually on a Friday afternoon. Anders, it's 2:30 P.M., I know you have had some other companies presenting before us. Anyway, my name is Henrik, this is Anders. We are the usual suspects going to do this today, we start as we normally do, to go through the presentation, then we are happy to take any questions you might have. To start with, we have a very strong result also in the Q3, a bit above SEK 1.1 billion, despite that we have had the maintenance shut. Of course, we have had a lot of help from really high wood products prices. Before we start to go through the different business areas, just take one step back and look at how we have come through the whole pandemic period. I'm happy to see that we have kept our net debt almost unchanged during the whole period, despite that we have given normal dividend or paid for normal dividend, we have bought Martinsons, we have also paid for a half a wind farm, roughly SEK 700 million. Roughly half, at least. Which is a very strong base for going forward in the future and develop the company further. A few words about the wood market. What we have seen lately, as you know, all sawmills have been running full, there has been quite a lot of competition for the saw logs in the forest, actually a bit more up in the north than in the southern parts of Sweden. We can also see that prices are on the rise, not so dramatically, but still the price trend is up. If you look at pulpwood, on the other hand, the market is more or less in balance for a couple of reasons. First of all, there have been some closures, and supply of wood has been quite high as well, partly driven by the spruce bark beetles down in the southern parts of Sweden. Anders, slightly higher prices, how does this compare to our financial results? Well, the financial performance of the forest is quite dull, as it should be. Not much has happened. We see slightly higher result in the Q3 over Q2, thanks to the higher timber prices. Thank you. Moving on to paperboard. Our two mills, one in Sweden, one in England, where we produce a bit more than half a million tons of paperboard. The market is actually quite good. The market balance is healthy. I would almost say it's under stress. Also, for some reasons, first of all, demand in Europe is up 4% so far this year compared to last year, which is strong, partly depending on that somewhere our virgin fiber-based board is also meeting recycled fiber-based board. That's white lined chipboard versus folding boxboard. There has been some substitution going towards more folding boxboard and less RCP-based products, partly because the availability of RCP isn't that good. There is in the market also a bit of cost pressure, and together with good demand and the balance, we also see, as we speak right now, a pressure on prices for paperboard up. We are currently negotiating, so we are not commenting on how this will go, and as you remember, we have always said that it takes time to change prices when it comes to consumer board, especially up in the niche where we are based. We have had maintenance shut, both in the Q2 and in the Q3, even though we have roughly the same volumes, or we have delivered roughly the same volumes, which means that we have reduced our stock levels a bit. Anders, it's quite a messy quarter, to be honest. Indeed. It is. If you try to summarize everything that has happened, including maintenance shuts, energy cost, et cetera. Yeah. Well, if we start with the YoY, the two major maintenance shuts have taken a toll slightly more than SEK 300 million on the profit. If you adjust for them, actually, we are performing slightly better than last year due to better production, as a result of a debottlenecking exercise we did in the Iggesund Mill. Looking at the quarter, both quarters, Q3 and Q2, has been affected by maintenance shuts. This quarter was a impact of SEK 140 million, but we also had seasonally low personnel cost, roughly SEK 30 million positive impact in the Q3. We have this turbine that is out of operation, and it's expected to start during January next year. It has no effect on our ability to produce board, but we have quite a big impact on the energy cost side. We are not getting any green certificates, and we need to buy electricity from the grid. That is very expensive in the U.K., as in most places in Europe. That had an impact of SEK 150 million as extra costs in Q3. The insurance investigation is still ongoing, so we don't have any result of it, and hence we can't take anything in the books with respect to the insurance compensation. Thank you. If we move on to paper. This year has included so many changes, so it's almost unbelievable. We started the year with a totally different picture or view of the market than where we are today. What we see in the market today is that there is a shortage of paper for a few reasons. First of all, there is not enough recycled fibers to de-ink to use to produce printing paper, or it's very expensive, as you can see on this chart. That means that all in all, that both RCP prices are getting more and more expensive, and there is always some kind of relation between what we call deinking, which is used for producing printing paper, and OCC, mainly used to produce testliner and fluting. That has also meant that prices of paper are on its way up, and we are also negotiating paper prices. As we are negotiating, we can't comment much more on that now. What we have seen, though, is that our concept of local Swedish wood, which there is enough of, and we have good control of the raw material supply, and fossil-free electricity. Well, electricity, we'll come to that, has become more expensive, but still that concept has proven quite successful today, and it has also meant that we have been able to actually run full since beginning of this year. As I said, we started the year with a totally different view, but slowly, but safely during the year, we have come back to full operations. What does that mean when it comes to financials, Anders? If we look YoY, we have lower prices this year. We have actually lost SEK 250 million in revenues due to lower prices. We have been able to regain that thanks to higher volumes and that we've been able to lower our costs, so essentially unchanged result despite the lower prices YoY. Q3, we see a good improvement in profitability. It's thanks to price increases on those contracts that we have renegotiated, and we have a better product mix as well. We do face higher electricity costs, but they have been balanced out by seasonally low cost for personnel and maintenance. They are roughly SEK 50 million lower than a normal quarter. Thanks. Wood products. Maybe we should have started with wood products today because it's the star of our company and other companies, of course, as well, if you have wood products. We have a market situation which is very interesting at the moment. We have had a period with price increases, extremely high prices for a while in the U.S., and European prices has gone up quite a lot as well, or actually a lot. Where we are right now, we are in a situation where we see that prices in Europe, they have definitely peaked. The question is where they will be in the Q4. We will see. We have a tendency in the U.S., because U.S. is a few months ahead of Europe, and what we have seen there is that it bottomed out during the summer. If we look at the future prices for November, which is a good indicator for where prices are going currently, we see that they are at least slowly on their way up again. It's not easy to know exactly what will happen, but that's the tendency we see in the market right now. You have Europe going down, and you have U.S. starting actually to pick up. Regardless, what we see is that the interest for building in wood has never been as high as it is right now. A lot of discussions, and I think also we have a rather good feeling about being an alternative to concrete and steel, and especially it's expensive with energy now, but most probably it will be even more expensive in the future with materials like concrete and steel when they have to carry the true climate cost. Coming back to high prices, Anders, in the Q3. It's a fantastic result both year-to-date and this quarter. If we look at the quarter, we benefited from quite good price increases, but on the other hand, we see that customers don't really take out the volumes. They're a bit wait-and-see mode. Deliveries are always seasonally a bit low in Q3, but this quarter they are lower than normal. We have also had some downtime during the vacation period where we have lower production than normal. Finally, a few words about renewable energy. I think we mentioned in the beginning that the energy situation in Europe, not only in Europe, it's in most parts of the world, it's really energy crunch where we are right now. Prices are extremely high. They are volatile. Also we see that the cost for emission rights are on a very high level, which means that it's not easy to handle energy costs regardless what operations you're running. Just a reminder to ourselves, it's a big dependence on fossil energy worldwide. Skellefteå, which will contribute with another roughly 35% of renewable energy production. Summarizing wind and especially hydropower situation during the Q3. We see a quarter with high prices, not as high in the northern part of Sweden as in the southern part, but still historically high. That has had a positive impact, but we do have some internal hedges that have countered that profit improvement. At the same time, it is a scarcity of water, which means that our production was lower than normal and our levels in the water reservoirs are 20% lower than a normal year, as it is for the rest of Sweden. Concluding again with our strategy, or call it business model, which I think is becoming more and more important to make people understand because it's actually quite beautiful. We grow houses. We never grow a single tree to burn or not even to produce paperboard or paper. From the leftovers, of course, we do that, and they also contribute to the climate benefit. More and more, we should make sure that we do not only harvest the trees growing in the forest, we should also make sure that we harvest the energy blowing over the trees and also the water running through the rivers. All in all, a sustainability and climate benefit, which is fantastic, I would say. That concludes our presentation, and we're happy to take any questions you might have. Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press zero, one on your telephone keypad. If you wish to withdraw your question, you may do so by pressing zero, tow to cancel. There will now be a brief pause while questions are being registered. The first question comes from Robin Santavirta from Carnegie. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thank you very much, and hello, everybody. First related to the wood products segment, quite a significant drop in deliveries in Q3. You said a bit seasonal element, also a little bit of destocking. Could you describe what kind of inventory levels are you seeing both for yourself and your customers and any particular segment or markets where you have weakness, or is it across the board? Our inventories are at a good level. That's not the problem. It's very difficult to assess how large inventories is there in the chain to the retail customers. They are shrinking by the day, but we can't give you any guidance on how large they are. I think is what you see in the U.S. is that they have done with it. They're already through that cycle and are slowly restocking again. In Europe, it's the opposite. I understand. Looking at your market, any particular weak or strong markets, or is it a similar development in all your key export markets? I think it's a lot of waiting right now from the customers, the ones that can wait and order tomorrow instead of today because they don't know exactly what to expect. That's what we see in the market right now. All right. Thanks. In terms of the paper market, seems to be a quite tight environment and costs are going up. You often speak about the long-term pricing intervals in your business. Any potential now to sort of renegotiate prices as apparently a lot of your competitors are increasing prices in the middle of the interval? Are you also doing that? In terms of paper, on the cost side, your cost per ton seems to go down. Could you explain how much is energy, chemicals, and logistics and what is the outlook when we go to 2022 for those input costs? Should you start by explaining the cost, and then I take the price? Yeah. What we see right now, we see an increase in energy prices. We will see a further increase in Q4, maybe SEK 60 million-SEK 70 million headwind from increasing energy prices. It's still a bit uncertain. That cost situation we expect to prevail in Q1. Then we expect energy prices for us at least to go back to a normal situation. When it comes to chemicals and transportation, yeah, we see some cost inflation. It's quite muted. It's not a meaningful number. When it comes to pricing and paper, well, first of all, normally, we always honor our contracts. On the other hand, we have a number of contracts kicking in from half year, Q4, beginning of the year, clearly, the majority are renegotiated for January 1st, but not all of them. They're also different in length. Some is a quarter, some half year, et cetera. I know there is a lot of discussions about breaking contracts, but normally we do not do that. I understand. Thank you. Then a final question on the paperboard segment. What kind of maintenance schedule for next year are you planning? What should we expect? We will have one major maintenance shut during the H2 of the year, and it will be at the Iggesund Mill. All right. Thank you. Thank you, Robin. Thank you. The next question comes from Christian Kopfer from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thanks, operator. Just one follow-up from my side. On the wood market, I think you mentioned, Henrik, that you see prices coming up a little bit in the U.S. Just wondering what you see on the prices in the U.S. in relation to what you have in the Nordic market right now. Is it profitable to ship wood products from a pricing point of view now than when the prices have turned up? Or are prices still very much higher in the Nordics? What you saw from the U.S., that was futures for deliveries in November. Where we are right now, you know that prices aren't stable. They are changing all the time. Right now, Europe is coming down a bit, and U.S. seems to go up a bit. As we speak today, they are roughly on the same level prices in Europe and in the U.S. It's no big difference. U.S. is coming from a much higher level, as you know. Right. I know. Okay, finally, then, on the paper side, sorry if you touched upon it already, maybe I missed it, on the price hikes, or let's put it this way, are you expecting to compensate with the higher prices to the higher energy price that you see? Yes, we are. Normally we do it when the contracts are running out, when we're negotiating a new contract. We have no intention to change or to break all the contracts we have at the current moment. Yeah. Okay. Thanks. Thank you. The next question comes from Johannes Grunselius from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hello, everyone. It's Johannes here. A question from my side on the CO2 credits that you get for free. The same goes with most of your peers. You're selling some of them at the end of the year, usually. Could you give some info how this could impact this year earnings? I suppose you will get much more profits from these CO2 credits this year compared to previous years. Thanks. We sell it gradually throughout the year. We don't sell it at one point in time. We sell it gradually throughout the year. You're right in pointing out that the income this year is higher than previous year because the prices of the carbon credits are higher, but the allocations are lower, reflecting the ambition of EU to lower the carbon dioxide, how the system is run. We sell it throughout the year. Okay. That's useful to know. I know from the annual report, obviously, what you made last year. Could you indicate what you expect to make this year of these credits? No, it is quite at the detail level. It is in our result for the first nine months. Okay The level we have. Maybe I missed this in the discussions earlier, but could you remind us about the hedging level for the coming quarter and next year in terms of energy, both on these volumes you are selling to the market and what you are buying in the market? Thanks. As we disclosed in the quarterly report, on a net level, when we measure our net exposure, it is 65% hedged for Q4. It is fully hedged for 2022, and 80% hedged for 2023. Okay. That's good to know. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Linus Larsson from SEB. Please go ahead. Thank you very much, and a good day to everyone. I'd like to continue on the energy topic, if I may. Just for clarification sake, what you said on the SEK 60 million-SEK 70 million up on the fourth versus the third quarter, was that relating to the paper division alone, or was it on the Group level, or could you just clarify that to start with? It was on the paper division. Great. If we look at paperboard then, if you could give the corresponding figure, please, and that I guess would be net of the energy bonus that you would at least normally have in the U.K., and it's part of the question whether you will have any of that this year given what's happened to the turbine at Workington. Normally, in the paperboard division, we are self-sufficient in energy. We don't see any effect between quarters. Okay Right now, when we operate the turbine, or don't operate the turbine, we will have a negative headwind from that in Q4, buying electricity from the market. I can't give any guidance on how much headwind we will have on it. We will classify it as an item affecting comparability. On the, how should I say, the adjusted EBIT line, it will remain a flat development? Yeah. That should reflect as if we run the turbine. Great. That's clear. Thank you very much. Yeah, no, I think I'm fine. Thank you. Thanks, Linus. Thank you. The next question comes from Martin Melbye from ABG. Please go ahead, your line is open. Yes, good afternoon. Within Sawmilling, when you say that prices are going down a bit in Europe, what does that mean in percent? Is that 20%? Regarding the volumes, how much of the drop in volumes in Q3 is due to a willingly, say, stopped production from your side? How much is coming back, say, in Q4? It's a very difficult question to answer, Martin. We are in the middle of everybody's trying to figure out how much will the price drop? When will I, as a customer, start to buy? Absolutely. We don't. Customers are simply waiting. If they can, they wait, and that affects our deliveries as well, of course. As Henrik mentioned, in the U.S., this de-stocking cycle maybe have taken three, four months before buyers had to start buying again, and that's when we see this bounce back in prices in the U.S. Regarding volumes, should volumes be getting back in Q4? Or is it wait and see mode for the whole operation? I think it is. It's very hard to predict. Okay. Where volumes are going. Depends what we have in between. The underlying demand in the market is good, but we have a de-stocking effect. Volume should pick up a bit in Q4, yeah. Okay. Then on the price negotiations for paper and paperboard, will that have an effect at all in Q4, or is it next year? Much more next year. Thank you. That's all. Thank you. The next question comes from Oskar Lindström from Danske Bank. Please go ahead, your line is open. Hi, this is Oskar. I'd like to continue a little bit on Martin's question there about wood products pricing. You're saying it's a wait and see mode in your main European markets. Could you say a little bit maybe about what the situation looks like in your export markets? North Africa, what's the situation in the U.K.? Any more color on that? No. We don't. It's difficult to give you much color right now, Oskar. It's essentially the same status. Some markets you have seen that they have started to buy, but it's early. It's a lot of destocking, Oskar. Do you have any feeling for how large their stocks are? Do they have a lot of stock that they can consume, or are they already hitting the bottom of the barrel? Very difficult to tell. We don't have any good statistics on that. As I mentioned, it took a few months for the U.S. to hit the bottom and go up again. When did this start here in Europe, would you say? How many months into the 3 months or so period are we? I don't know. I think we're in the middle of it right now, actually. Okay. I realize it's difficult to answer about the rather opaque wood products market. I have another question. Given the strong structural outlook and picture that you paint for wood products, do you have any possibility to expand capacity in your operations? Or is it more attractive to expand downstream in that operation? I think we've done quite a lot lately, haven't we? We expanded the Braviken sawmill. We bought Linghem, and lately also Martinsons, including also, actually, the building systems. Sure, we can do some things, but no major effect on volumes as we take small steps every day. We try to, at least. Would you directly have enough access to timber and so on to expand if you wanted to? We are in a position where we do have a very strong position in the wooden market, so that should not be the limitation. It's more what we want to do, what does make sense, and the timing of it. Right now, we're sort of in a consolidation mode Just a final question, maybe a little bit more general, but on that theme. You have a very strong balance sheet, great earnings at the moment, strong cash flow generation. The wind power park in Blåbergsliden is mostly paid for already. Where are you looking to allocate capital? Do you have attractive growth opportunities in the company? Is it returning capital to shareholders or acquisitions? Where do you see the opportunity? We do have good opportunities to develop our industry. We're interested in expanding the wind farms once we get permits, and we are not concerned of having a strong financial situation. Rather the contrary, we like to have it. Yeah. All right. Very good. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Lars Kjellberg from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead, your line is open. Thank you. Paper-based packaging has been in very good demand. Are you still seeing that good demand trend? Are you, as a company, obvious you're more in niche maybe, but are you seeing any wins from other substrates? Again, coming back to your thinking about your substituting and having a positive carbon effect, are you seeing any wins from fossil-based packaging materials to you directly, or if you have any color on that'd be really helpful. I guess you mean replacing plastics? Correct. I think we should be a bit careful also. There is so much done in the plastic industry as well to make it green. We don't know exactly where that will go, but we see a lot of interest and ways to cooperate with customers to try to find solution where we could replace a bit of plastic. Over time, I think that will happen, but no major effect on our business. The underlying demand is nice. It's good. It's better than before, to be honest. If you look at Europe a few years ago, we didn't see the same increase in demand either. I think you have to look a bit also at the white lined chipboard and the recycled fiber-based side of the business. There is some substitution going on from recycled fiber-based to virgin fiber-based. It's fair to say that your order books today and your folding boxboard and SBS business is very strong? Yes. No meaningful change from the strength you saw in the H1 of the year, just continued. At the moment, they are really, really strong, yes. We have had our maintenance shuts, as you know, of course, that has a bit of an effect of our delivery times as well, pushed them a bit further away. If I give some flavor, Lars. Early in the year, we more saw that the Asian demand was very strong. Europe has come along nicely throughout the year, and it has become quite a lot better during the year from the European side. Shifting to Blåbergsliden, when do you actually expect to ramp this up? You're talking about the next few months. How should we think about the ramp-up of those facilities, the 26 turbines you're ramping up? How long will it take to reach that nominal capacity that you've been talking about? The nominal capacity we should reach somewhere in Q2. We should have all of the mills producing during late Q1 and gradually from the coming weeks. It will be a gradual ramp-up. We should potentially expect some contribution from this business already in Q4, then? Yeah, some, but it's quite marginal. Got it. All right. That's it from me. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Cole Hathorn from Jefferies. Please go ahead, your line is open. Afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. The first one is just a clarification question. On the last call, you mentioned that there's going to be about a SEK 30 million-SEK 40 million, kind of one-off deductible for the insurance claim on the turbine. I'm just wondering, have you recognized that as a cost? Then the SEK 151 that you mentioned, kind of adjusting item, is that separate? That's just the first question. The second question is looking at the Wood Products division from kind of a longer-term perspective. You talked about multi-year demand trends and the benefits that you're seeing there. When you think about pricing, not near term, but on a longer-term horizon, should we be thinking about pricing above the pre-COVID levels and demand above the pre-COVID levels? This is the second question. Finally on renewable energy, you just mentioned that you should be at full capacity in the second quarter on the new wind farm. I'm just wanting to clarify, is that potential future capacity, is it hedged on the forward curve, that energy production, or will that be open into the market? Thank you. Should we take the SEK 35 million first? We have not concluded the insurance case, hence we have not been able to recognize any revenue, and we have not taken any cost for deductible on the insurance. The SEK 150 million effect we have in the report is purely from the extra cost we have had of buying electricity from the grid and not receiving green certificates. You speculate in the future prices of wood and the demand. You saw that I said that I think it's a rather interesting position to be an alternative to concrete and steel. Partly why we believe that's interesting is that most probably just concrete and steel will have to carry quite the big climate cost in the future. We see emission rights right now, where they're going, et cetera, and that maybe could mean that prices for building come up, and we can then follow whatever the price will be for concrete and steel. To add to your comment, during the last 15 years, wood products have tracked, although it has been volatile, it has tracked the cost of concrete. If you have to capture the carbon dioxide in the concrete, that comes with a cost. It should make concrete much more expensive in the future. Correct. Thank you. Thank you. Just a reminder that if would like to ask a question please press zero, one on your telephone keypad. We have no further questions, so I will pass back to the speakers. Thank you very much for taking your time, again, especially as it's a Friday afternoon, and have a nice weekend. Bye-bye.