Good afternoon, good morning, and welcome to the Q3 Interim Report for Immunovia. I'm excited to speak with you today about the milestones we've achieved and the progress that we've made in our mission to save lives through early detection of pancreatic cancer. This is a really important quarter for us as it marked the transition from being a development stage company to being a commercial stage company, where we brought our PancreaSure test to the market and saw the initial response to that. We have been very excited about the responses that we've received. Throughout this presentation, I'll try to share a little bit of perspective from some of our customers about the PancreaSure test. Here you can see one of those comments from Dr. Raj Kaswani, who works at Northwestern Medicine, who is excited about offering this screening option to his patients. He calls out the fact that the test has a high sensitivity and a high specificity, and so it's a valuable option for their high-risk patients at Northwestern Medicine. On today's call, we'll talk about the launch of PancreaSure and share some initial results. We'll also talk about reimbursement milestones that we've achieved and what lies ahead. We'll briefly cover the Q3 financial results and our cash position. I would like to share a little bit more information about the AFIRM clinical study that we announced results for a while back. Just as a reminder, before we talk about the results of the PancreaSure launch, I thought it would be helpful to go back and make sure that we talked a little bit about the strategy that we're pursuing for the test. One of the things we want to do is really build advocacy, build use among key opinion leaders who practice at the top high-risk surveillance centers across the United States. One of the other things we want to do is make sure that we're smart about how we spend our money. We want to execute a very targeted, low-cost launch that leverages our existing resources as much as possible so that our investment doesn't get ahead of our ability to generate revenue. As we think about expanding over time, that's where we want to bring in a partner. A lot of what we're doing in these early stages is demonstrating the potential of the PancreaSure test so that as we think about what the potential volume is for the test and the reimbursement potential, that potential is obvious to a potential partner for us. It is going to be critical that we continue to run lean, that we operate very efficiently, and that we limit our expenses, looking for ways to automate so that we can scale without our expenses increasing at the same time. Here is a quote from one of our customers, Ray Wadlow, who is a gastrointestinal oncologist at Inova Schar Cancer, just outside of Washington, DC. It speaks to the fact that we are making a transition from the development stage to the commercial stage. As we do that, the fact that we have engaged so many key opinion leaders in our clinical program really sets the stage for us to succeed commercially. Dr. Wadlow was involved in our CLARITY clinical study, and in addition, his patients participated. He said that they are very excited now to use the test that is available in the market. This is something that we've seen from multiple physicians who were involved in our clinical studies. As we've shared previously, we will launch PancreaSure in three phases. As I mentioned earlier, we want to increase our commercial investment as we start to approach and achieve reimbursement so that when we start to generate significant volume, we're getting paid for that volume, and we're not investing money in generating too much volume that doesn't generate a lot of revenue. We'll go through three phases: targeted advocacy, which will last until around the middle of 2026, a volume-building phase that will comprise the end of 2026, and then as we move into 2027, we will really focus on revenue growth as both the volume builds and we start to get reimbursement from payers. As we think about the first stage that we're in right now, just as a reminder, our objective is to build targeted advocacy. In this phase, we are targeting those key opinion leaders who practice and who screen for pancreatic cancer at top high-risk surveillance centers across the United States. Our sales effort has been very, very limited at this point. We have not yet hired any salespeople. The sales effort has been completely done by members of the management team and I reaching out to prospects, including both those who participated in our clinical studies, those who used our prior IMMray PanCan-d test, and then others that we have met over the years. A really important thing during the three phases of this launch is that the metrics that we use to evaluate our progress will change over time. When we're in this targeted advocacy phase, our primary metric is going to be the number of high-risk surveillance centers that order PancreaSure. That's our key metric of success. Are we getting more and more of those top physicians, those experts in the field, to raise their hand and say, "I want to use the PancreaSure test with my patients"? That's a really critical metric for us, more important than volume, more important even than revenue. Those things will come, but the first thing that we have to do is build that advocacy. Because if we build that advocacy, that sets the foundation for us to grow the business going forward from here. I'm very excited to share our progress so far on that key metric. As of the end of the third quarter, we had 10 leading pancreatic cancer centers who had implemented PancreaSure, and that's just in the first month. If you remember, we launched the test on September 2nd. In just those four weeks, we were able to get 10 centers registered and up and running ordering the test. You can see some of the names here on the right-hand side of the screen. We can't disclose all of them. Some of these centers have a prohibition against using their names and sharing them commercially, but we are very excited by the fact that we've got a range of systems represented here. Some of them, like Northwestern and Penn Medicine, are top academic institutions. Others, like Hackensack Meridian and Honor Health, are community health systems that are not affiliated with an academic center but do have a high-risk surveillance program. This represents the range that we want to pursue. You can also see here a good geographic range. We have everything from the northeast with Penn to the west with University of Colorado Health. Honor Health is in Arizona and Hackensack Meridian, New Jersey. We have a good geographic representation across the country. That is important because we want to build advocacy overall, but also in specific regions within the country. I mentioned that our metrics will evolve as we move through the three phases of the launch. When we get into the volume-building phase later on in 2026, that is when our primary metric will really become PancreaSure volume, and we will start looking at revenue as we get into 2027. It is not that we are not focused on how to generate revenue. It's just that the most important thing that we can do in the near term to ultimately generate the revenue that we need is to focus on building that targeted advocacy. One of the things I think is important to understand is how does our testing process work, and what does that mean in terms of when a test order becomes a completed test and ultimately leads to a patient paying for that test? Here you have a simple flow chart that shows the fact that once a physician orders the test in our online portal, we immediately contact the patient to schedule their blood draw. That can happen the same day in some cases. In other cases, it may take us up to a week to reach that patient. Once we reach them, we schedule that appointment to have their blood drawn so that we can collect the sample. Sometimes that happens as soon as the next day. In other cases, because of that patient's schedule, it may take a few weeks to get that appointment scheduled. Once the blood is collected, it's shipped overnight to our lab in North Carolina. From there, it takes us somewhere between 2 and 10 days to run the test. Running the test is actually quite quick, but we want to batch tests together so that we're not doing a small number because that increases our cost per test. By batching them together in larger batches, we reduce the cost per test, and we deliver the results in a reasonable time to our customers. As you see here, once we deliver the results to the provider, we send out the bill within a day to the patient. From there, as you can imagine, it may take some time to collect the revenue from that patient to collect that payment. It can be as quick as the next day if they use their credit card to pay online. For some people, we need to send them a couple of reminders before they pay. In total, what you can see is that we can, in some cases, go from a test order to cash collection in an ideal scenario as quick as about a week. That is about as quick as we could do it. There may be other situations where it takes a few months or even longer. That is just something to be aware of that we know this is a dynamic in this market, and we are planning accordingly. One of the other things that will impact how quickly an order turns into revenue is the fact that we give our physicians what we call future order functionality. What that means is that if a patient is in the physician's office, maybe they are having an MRI or they are having an endoscopic ultrasound, that physician may want to use the PancreaSure test. In many cases, many of our physicians tell us how they want to use the test is at six-month intervals in between that imaging that is done with an MRI or an endoscopic ultrasound. What we do is we give the physician the opportunity to place a future order while that patient is in their office, while that patient is right in front of them. That order gets captured in our system, and then we know once it's time for that order to happen, we go through the normal process where we contact the patient and schedule the blood draw. In some cases, that might lead to waiting to reach out to that patient for six months, which is probably most common. We've seen some future orders placed as far out as nine months. We know that this is something that ultimately will really bolster our results. It's essentially building a pipeline of future tests. While we're in the early days following launch, some of these orders are just going to take quite a while to work their way through the system. Again, as we think about this targeted advocacy idea, I just wanted to share one last quote from one of our key opinion leaders. He works at New York University. He leads the pancreatic cancer surveillance screening program there. Dr. Gonda talked about the fact that NYU is a major network of hospitals with different levels of access to cancer screening across their system. In fact, one of their sites is actually down in Florida and treats New York residents who are in Florida different parts of the year. Because PancreaSure is a simple blood test, NYU can use our test to expand the access within their system. Previous research within NYU shows that only one in five people who is eligible for pancreatic cancer screening is actually getting screened. A big part of the problem is access to the imaging approaches that have always been the standard of care for pancreatic cancer surveillance. By giving them a blood test, we give them a new option. One of the things that's especially exciting is that we've been working with Dr. Gonda on the initial setup, and that setup has been in the New York area. We actually had one of the physicians down in Florida who practices with the New York University practice in Florida reach out to us proactively, not even realizing yet that the New York group was starting to set up this program, and said, "We'd really like to take advantage of the PancreaSure test. How do we get set up to use it?" I think that speaks to the fact that there is a clear demand for the PancreaSure test. Moving on from our launch progress, let's talk a little bit about reimbursement and the milestones that we've achieved and what lies ahead. If you think about getting reimbursed for a diagnostic test in the United States, there are really four elements that come into play. We refer to them as the four C's: code, cost, coverage, and contracts. A code is the billing code that's used to identify a test. This really facilitates the reimbursement and billing process when we send a claim to an insurance company and ask them to reimburse us. Cost refers to the price of the test, and that's really determined by the clinical lab fee schedule, which is set by Medicare, a government agency. Coverage is the payer's determination that the test is reasonable and it's medically necessary. Essentially, what they're saying with coverage is, "We believe that this test adds value for the patients who are covered by our insurance plan, and therefore we're going to pay for our patients to have this test." Contract is something that happens with commercial insurance companies where we enter into a contract. It really sets terms of payment and really ensures that the process runs smoothly. If you look at our progress across these four elements, what you see is we've made very good progress in 2025. Earlier this year, we received our code, and that code is effective as of October 1, 2025. I'm also very excited to share literally just late yesterday, we received notice from Medicare that they have set the final clinical lab fee schedule rate for the PancreaSure test. They've set the rate at $897, which means that when Medicare reimburses us in the future, that reimbursement will be $897. We're excited about that rate. We think that it really fairly reflects the value of our test and reflects the clinical and economic impact that we can have and that Medicare expects us to have on the people who use the Medicare program. The next step is coverage. We don't have coverage in place today. The key there is to complete and publish the clinical studies that show that medical necessity, that prove to Medicare and prove to commercial insurers that this test is something that should be included in the physician's approach to early screening for pancreatic cancer. Let's talk a little bit more about coverage. To prove medical necessity and secure coverage, we've got to generate three types of evidence: analytical validation, clinical validation, and clinical utility. Analytical validity means does the lab measure the biomarkers accurately? It's essentially a very lab-focused measure of are we, for the five biomarkers in the PancreaSure test, accurately measuring the level of that biomarker in the patient's blood? You can see that we've completed our studies there, and we're actively pursuing publication of that study. Next is clinical validation. Clinical validation essentially means if you're given a blood sample and you run the test, can you accurately distinguish cancer from a sample that doesn't have cancer? You're likely familiar with the results that we've announced previously from the CLARITY study and from the VERIFY study. On today's call, I'm going to share with you results from a third study called AFIRM. We have just had the CLARITY study published. It was published in the Journal of Gastroenterology, which is really considered the premier journal in gastrointestinal disease. One of our key opinion leaders who publishes extensively said he was incredibly surprised that they selected a diagnostic test to publish an article in Gastroenterology. He said it really speaks to the quality of the CLARITY study and the promise of the PancreaSure test. For analytical validity and clinical validity, we have excellent data, and we're largely ready to submit that to insurers. The key is just making sure that everything is published. Clinical utility is the final part of the clinical evidence package that we need to generate. We currently have two clinical utility studies underway. These are studies that are being funded by the National Institutes of Health of the US government. There is very minimal cost to us. We are looking to conduct additional studies in 2026 and beyond. Why additional studies? There are a couple of reasons. One, the two studies that are underway will take a few years to complete. We want to have some clinical utility studies that can be done more quickly. That's why we'll be doing survey studies that we can complete in the first part of 2026 so that we can submit them as evidence of clinical utility in 2026. Another reason that we want to show or demonstrate clinical utility across multiple studies is that there are multiple ways that the study can or that our test can show value. Clinical utility basically means do you impact physician decisions and/or can you improve patient outcomes based on using the test? There are, as you can imagine, multiple ways to show that because the test is used different ways. For example, if the test is used to evaluate pancreatic cysts for patients who are going to surgery, that's a different kind of clinical utility than if that test is used in someone who has a family history of pancreatic cancer and they're being monitored over time to identify cancer as quickly as we can. We want to do multiple clinical utility studies so that we really build out that body of evidence. As we now switch to the Q3 financial results and the cash position, we are excited to share that this was a solid quarter for us from a cash flow and financial results standpoint. We had net sales of SEK 101,000. That was almost entirely royalty revenue. As we discussed earlier, it will take quite a while for orders that were placed in September to actually generate revenue. We do not expect to see that for a little while here. That revenue will come more in 2026 as we ramp up our volume and as we start to realize that revenue as patients work their way through the testing process. Our operating loss for the third quarter was SEK 25.5 million, which was down from SEK 31.2 million last year. Importantly, as we approached the launch, we also looked for any way possible to conserve cash. Our cash burn was reduced to SEK 5.4 million per month. That is well below the guidance that we have had in place of SEK 8-10 million per month. I do want to highlight, as we move forward with the launch, we certainly expect to go back more to that previous guidance level of SEK 8-10 million, but we wanted to do everything we could to preserve cash prior to the launch. At the end of the third quarter, our cash was SEK 26.6 million, and that was bolstered by a bridge loan that we had received during the quarter. As you recall, our cash position was bolstered by a successful rights issue. That rights issue actually completed after quarter end, but we were very excited with the way it played out. We were excited that guarantors were interested in guaranteeing the rights issue to 100%. Even more grateful and excited that 87.9% of rights issues were subscribed. That really, I think, speaks to the support that we've received from shareholders. I want to express how much I appreciate that. I know that it's been a difficult ride as a shareholder and appreciate the continued trust that you have placed in us. Because of that trust, we were able to raise just over SEK 100 million, which resulted in a net cash infusion of just under SEK 70 million when you account for the repayment of the bridge loan that I mentioned. That cash will take us into the third quarter of 2026. We'll use these funds to fund the commercial launch and also those clinical studies that I mentioned earlier in the clinical utility arena. Finally, before we wrap up and transition to questions, I want to share the results from the AFIRM clinical validation that we recently completed. The AFIRM study comes after two prior studies. You'll remember that we did the CLARITY study and the VERIFY study. Those were both intended to show that we could accurately detect stage one and two pancreatic cancer when you were looking at that cancer compared to high-risk controls. Control samples from people who have that familial or hereditary risk for cancer, people who have pancreatic cysts that put them at risk for cancer. Can we distinguish in between those two groups? The CLARITY and the VERIFY results showed we absolutely could. We had very strong sensitivity, meaning that we could detect cancer, as well as specificity, meaning that we did not have a lot of false positives where we returned a positive result when there really was not cancer there. One of the questions that we got from physicians after those two studies was, "We understand the fact that you focused on stage one and two for early detection. That's really important. But are you certain that if a patient has stage three or four cancer, you will detect it?" That was one of the key questions we wanted to solve or wanted to answer. Another question was, "How would the test perform in a normal patient population, meaning those people who are not at high risk?" That's important because many of our competitors in the early detection space have historically used normal patient populations as controls. What happens is it's easier to avoid a false positive if you use those normal patients as your controls. We wanted to have the data that allowed an apples-to-apples comparison between our test and, for example, some of the multi-cancer early detection tests that are out there. We were thrilled with the results. They turned out exactly how we would have hoped. PancreaSure showed excellent sensitivity, 10 percentage points higher in stage three and four cancer compared to the sensitivity that we showed in stage one and two. If you look at the VERIFY and the CLARITY studies, on average, we were able to detect about 78% of stage one and two cancers. In the AFIRM study where we looked at stage three and four pancreatic cancers, we detected 88% of those cancers, so literally 10 percentage points more. Similarly, we saw excellent specificity, even higher than what we had seen with the high-risk controls. We showed 98% specificity in those healthy controls in the AFIRM study. This data adds to the body of evidence that says PancreaSure is a very accurate test. The fact that it becomes more accurate as a patient moves through the stages of disease shows that our five biomarkers really are detecting cancer and increasing or decreasing as cancer comes to be in a person's body and over time as that cancer grows and develops. Another excellent set of clinical data that really gives us confidence in the test itself. With that, I'm excited to see if there are any questions. We can certainly take questions for the call in, as well as you can ask questions using the chat feature as well. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you've entered a queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Questioners on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode while asking a question. Anyone with a question may press star and one at this time. Once again, to ask a question, please press star followed by one. We have a question from Nicholas Elhammer from Carlsquare. Please go ahead. Hello. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. Thank you for an excellent presentation and very clearly explaining the steps of reimbursement and commercialization. I was wondering, what do you know about the test so far? How is it used? Is it used as a complement to other screening methods, such as endoscopic ultrasound? The comments from the clients seem to suggest, or is it perhaps subjects that are eligible but not doing screening for some reason and sort of reaching a new patient? Yeah. Thanks for the question, Nicholas. What we're hearing is all of those things. For existing patients, we have physicians who are using the test on those six-month intervals in between their regularly scheduled imaging, whether that's MRI or ultrasound or, in some cases, even a CT scan. We have some physicians who are using the test at the same time that they do imaging. Essentially, they want to sync up the two so that they can understand how the results compare. We do certainly see a number of physicians who are using the test for people who are not in surveillance today. That can mean a lot of different things. For example, some physicians are using the test for people who do not meet the formal criteria for pancreatic cancer, but maybe they have a reason to be concerned. For example, this might be someone who has one relative with pancreatic cancer, but maybe they don't meet the formal definition for screening yet. Maybe they're too young, or the relative was not a close relative, but a more distant relative. We're seeing them use the test in that situation. We're also seeing them use the test for people who are younger and really don't want to sign up for 30 years or more of intense imaging surveillance. I think we'll learn a lot more about how the test is being used. We're conducting a quality survey now. One of the things that we're asking physicians to do is provide information about how they are using the test for each particular patient. We look forward to sharing that data in the quarters to come. Okay. Great. A little bit going back, you have explained a lot about the reimbursement process. How is it going sort of with Medicare? Is it reasonable to expect reimbursement from Medicare in 2026? Yeah. Medicare is our clear focus for reimbursement initially. It is a very large payer. It is a very important payer. It is also one of the payers that is most proactive about providing coverage. It is our clear focus. We are waiting for that last clinical utility evidence that I mentioned, those surveys. We will then be submitting to Medicare in 2026. In terms of the timing of when that coverage actually happens, that is something that we cannot really predict. The timeline is not set in stone by any stretch. We will be able to share information about when we submit. At that point, we will not know when we will get coverage. The one thing that I will share is that now that we have a code and we have a rate, we can begin submitting claims to insurance companies. We do hope to see some insurance company reimbursement in 2026. It'll be limited because we don't have those coverage policies in place yet, but we are hoping to see some of that in 2026. Oh, great. That sounds promising. A little bit regarding the organization, end of the period report, 12 employees, I believe. That's excluding any account managers, I believe. They should be added going forward. That's correct. Our plan is to add three strategic account managers who will sell the test throughout the country. I think that's going to be a really important addition to the team. Okay. Great. Finally, you have provided some guidance. What about R&D costs going forward? Should we expect that to ramp up or be stable? Yeah. I guess what I would say is our intention is to keep our total expenses and cash burn within the guidance that we've shared previously of $8 million-$10 million per month. There may be times when our R&D expenses ramp up, but there will be other savings that we try to offset that with. We'll be finalizing our 2026 budget here very shortly and getting that approved through the board. Part of that process is to make final decisions about a couple of the clinical studies that we're considering, but we need to think about how that fits into the budget financially. Okay. Great. Thank you very much. All right. Thanks a lot, Nicholas. There are no further questions from the phone. Okay. We've got some questions on the chat line. I'll share those and then answer them. One is, you described the embrace of the PancreaSure test in the scientific community. How do you convert that embrace into orders and sales? I think this is a great question. What we see is that there is a high level of interest in the experts who run the pancreatic cancer surveillance programs. They are eager to use the test and to start incorporating it into their practice. At the same time, that requires change. They have to change their processes. They have to change, in some cases, formal protocols. Part of what we will do is work with them to understand how do those processes need to change, what specific patient populations do they want to use the test for, how can they identify those people within their patient base, and what steps do they need to take in order to be in a position to utilize the test fully. That is one of the things Nicholas asked about staffing. That is one of the key ways that the account managers will add value. We really want them to get in, get integrated with these high-risk surveillance centers, get to know the staff people, because ultimately, while the tests are ordered by the physician, the staff people really play a crucial role in identifying patients for testing, making sure that orders are placed, and following through to make sure that the testing happens. All of those things will be key elements of our effort to make sure that we can turn that enthusiasm into orders and sales. A question: how much are patients paying for the test? That varies based on their ability to pay. We offer patients financial assistance if they have lower income. The amount that a patient pays could be $0, it could be $100, it could be $200, or it could be as much as $995. People who are not eligible for financial assistance are going to pay somewhere between $750 and $995. As time goes on, we'll be able to provide a better estimate of what's our average selling price and what's the average amount that a patient pays for the test. Are we still pursuing a commercial ally or partner? Can you tell us about that process? Yes, we are absolutely still very interested in partnering with a large diagnostics company that will ultimately help us expand our physician reach significantly and drive volume. What we do currently is keep those potential partners informed about different developments that are happening. When we attend conferences, we schedule meetings with those potential partners. For example, I'll be attending the JP Morgan conference in January that brings together many of the top life sciences companies in the world. We'll be having a number of meetings with those potential partners at that time. As you can imagine, it's difficult to say when that will lead to a partnership agreement being put in place. The reality is that we want to make sure that we don't enter an agreement too soon. That may sound strange, but we want to enter into an agreement when we've demonstrated the potential of PancreaSure, when we've made more progress on reimbursement, so that the split of value between us and that partner is more shaded to Immunovia's benefits. We are absolutely still pursuing it and are excited to move forward with that. Okay. I don't think we have any other questions unless there's any that somebody had in mind that they want to ask quickly before we wrap up. There are no further questions from the phone. Thank you very much for your time. I really appreciate you joining the call today to learn a little bit more about our progress in launching the PancreaSure test and in building towards reimbursement for the test in 2026 and beyond. I'm thrilled that we have crossed over and made the transition to the point where we are now commercializing the PancreaSure test. It really is a major step forward for us in achieving our mission of saving lives through early detection. It is a really important milestone for the company and for our shareholders. Thank you for your support, and we look forward to more good news in the future. Take care.