Hello, and welcome to the presentation of Mycronic's Q2 report. My name is Sven Chetkovich. I'm the Director, Investor Relations at Mycronic. With me, I have Mycronic's CEO and President, Anders Lindqvist, and CFO and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, Pierre Brorsson. With that, I hand over to Anders. Please go ahead and present Mycronic's second quarter. Okay. Thank you very much, Sven, and good morning to everyone. What we will present today is short summary of the quarter. We will go a little bit deeper in the different divisions. Pierre will give further explanations on the financials, some final remarks, and then you have the opportunity to ask questions that we will answer. In the presentation, which we will not present, is also the market update for those who wanna look into that. If we start with the quarter, a short summary, we could see a quite good increase in order intake by 20%. It has to be noted that this is supported by a very positive currency effect and also by acquisitions. Excluding for that, it's more or less a flat ordering intake compared to the same quarter last year. Sales increased with 20% to close to SEK 1.3 billion, and we could see very nice increases in the three divisions, High Flex, High Volume, and Global Technologies. Also here, supported partly by positive currency effects and acquisitions, while we had a decline in Pattern Generators, which I will explain in a while. EBIT decreased a little bit to SEK 224 million, and all divisions showed double-digit EBIT margins. We are, very happy to see that the three divisions, High Flex, High Volume, and Global Technologies, are all above 10%, which is also the former AS division. Very happy with that. We had lower sales in Pattern Generators and also very challenging comparative quarter last year for High Volume, explaining the decrease in EBIT. The margin ended at 18%. Backlog is a little bit more than SEK 2.1 billion, which is a good level for us. It contained nine mask writers as of end of the quarter. Going into a little bit more details on the different divisions, starting with the Pattern Generators. We could see that the market for photomask has been strong and is strong. You can see from the Omdia report that it's forecasted to grow 10%, and this is despite the uncertainty that we have in the world with lockdowns in China and war in Ukraine and et cetera. We did not receive any orders during the second quarter, so the order intake declined with 16%. Because of that, however, the pipeline for the rest of the year looks very promising for us. The sales decreased by 11%. We delivered 5 SLX mask writer machines, and the EBIT ended at SEK 110 million, which is less than last year. This is explained by the lower sales and also a less advantageous product mix. Backlog SEK 635 million, which is good, and as said, nine systems in that backlog at the end of the quarter. Moving then to the High Flex division. Here we have seen a very good demand in the market, especially in Europe and also North America. China has been a little bit weaker, very much due to the COVID lockdowns that are still occurring in China. You could see that the trend of relocation of production of electronics is continuing, and the relocation is going from Asia to North America and Europe, which is a positive for us because our product offering has a very good fit to the nature of such production, and also we have very good geographical presence in these areas. To further increase our geographical presence, we are actually now opening an entity in Mexico to support this increase in production. The order intake increased 19%, and despite still challenges on the supply chain and on the freight and logistic side, we were able to keep up with very good delivery times for our key products. Sales increased 18% and gross margin 41%, which is a reasonably good gross margin. EBIT up to SEK 45 million. Quite good increase in the order backlog to close to SEK 240 million. Very good result in this division. The High Volume division here is mainly have its business in China. Despite, as we had in the other division with weaker sales because of lockdowns, we were not so much impacted by that in this division. This is very much because of the car industry, especially the electric car industry, which have shown a very good demand. Order intake increased 27%. Here we also have a very strong currency effect, and also we have made an acquisition here, in last year. Without these effects, the order intake was more or less same as on the last year's level. Sales increased with 21% and the margin 41%, which is a normal margin for us. You can see that the comparative quarter last year we had 53%, which is extremely high and higher than normal. This is the reason for the decline. Also explaining why EBIT declined to SEK 65 million coming from SEK 94 million, as we had the lower gross profit in the same quarter, but also we have had increased bad debt provisions in this division. The backlog increased to close to SEK 1 billion coming from SEK 758 million. We have also announced earlier our intention to investigate the possibility to list Axxon. Axxon is the main company in the High Volume division. We are investigating the possibility to list Axxon on the stock exchange in Shanghai. The reason why we do this is that Axxon has been extremely successful over the years during our ownership. We have had an average annual growth of very close to 40%, and we have been growing very profitable. We want to continue this going forward. At the same time, we see that the competition increase, especially in China. It's not only competition for customers, it's also competition for employees, land or space for production and also on acquisitions. You can see that there is a disadvantage not to be listed in China when competing for talent and for land and for customers and suppliers, et cetera. We believe this would allow us to continue our successful growth journey. That's why we are investigating this possibility. We move to Global Technologies. It had a very good result there, a very strong EBIT. You could see that the market for testing of PCB and also substrate has been very strong. This market is mainly in Asia and no slowdown was visible in China despite lockdowns. On the die bonding side, we also saw a very solid business, even though our customers, companies like Google, Facebook, et cetera, which are running large data centers, have announced some recruitment freezes, but our business has been continued to be good. Order intake, if we exclude acquisition and divestment, because we also divested a business earlier this year, decreased 9%, and the sales increased with 11%. EBIT, we're very happy with this result of SEK 43 million or equal to 17% b acklog up to SEK 284 million at the end of the quarter. The outlook for this year, we have no intention to change that. We still believe that we will end with the net sales at around SEK 5 billion. This is at currency rates as end of last year when we announced this target. Also unchanged is the EBIT target of 2022, slightly above 15%, which is our long-term financial target as well, which is lower than normal for us. This is also because of the product mix that we have in the backlog, especially on the Pattern Generators side, which is explaining this. When it comes to the financial targets, right now we have a target of being above 15% over a business cycle and also have a net debt that is less than three times EBITDA, on average over a few years. As we will reach our revenue target this year, we have decided and are working on new financial targets, and this will be presented at the Capital Markets Day later this year, which will be on September 5 after summer. You will know about our new targets. All right, that was the end of my part. I will hand over now to Pierre, who will explain a little bit about the financials. Thank you, Anders, and good morning, everyone. On a rolling 12-month basis, we are now at SEK 4.7 billion. From now on, we will only be supported by a very limited effect on the acquisition side. That now is ending with the large acquisition that was made in the middle of last year. As you can see, the EBIT rolling 12-month has continued down to a level which is about what we said in our outlook for the full year to be slightly above the 15%. As you see on the next page, more clearly, the comparisons are a little bit less challenging in the second half of the year, compared to in the beginning of the year. We don't expect this one to continue downwards. Aftermarket is now closing in on SEK 1.5 billion, continuously increasing, even if it was not a sequential increase quarter-over-quarter this quarter, but still above last year. This is a very good base for us to in case the equipment business would be somewhat slower. Here you can see that we have been steadily delivering this 15%-20% over the last couple of quarters. You can also see that Q3 and Q4 of last year, as I mentioned, was a little bit lower than the very strong start of last year we had when we were delivering profitably within Pattern Generators. We have a year where we have another mix within Pattern Generators and where also Pattern Generators is making up a smaller share of the total Mycronic business. If we look at the profit and go some time back when we made the divisionalization, the Pattern Generators was more or less equal to the total profit of Mycronic, and for this quarter, for instance, it's just above 50%. Very happy to have a better distribution between the divisions. If we look at the comparison between last year's quarter and this year's quarter, we can see that there was a distinctly higher gross margin last year, and if we would multiply this year's volume with that, then we would have added SEK 109 million to the EBIT of this year. With the product mix, as explained before, we were lower, and thereby going down to 45% on average. We had a little bit higher operational costs. This is to about SEK 25 million of these. Around SEK 50 million is related to acquisition or the net effect of acquisitions and divestments I should say. On top of that, we had a little bit higher costs in particular in related to receivables in China, where we provided for this had a net effect of around SEK 10 million, where we released some provisions last year and increased provisions this year. In the other column, you find the result of the revaluation of currencies as well as the net of subsidies, and both of these were positive in the quarter versus the same quarter last year. Division-wise, summarizing this up, we had then lower EBIT contribution from PG, as mentioned, with lower sales and lower gross margin on the sales we had. In High Flex, we had higher sales, and we also had a better gross margin. In High Volume, we had this was lower despite a little bit of currency support when revaluing the result, but largely due to the gross margin, but also to some degree on the cost side. A strong contribution from Global Technologies, our smallest division, where we saw a very good result both in our die bonding business and our electrical testing business. Looking at the cash flow, we had a few effects compared to last year. If we look at this is then displaying the situation, not quarter-on-quarter, but year-to-date. We have, of course, as mentioned several times, a lower operational result. We have also a build-up on the receivable side, and this is largely related to China. It's not only the HV division, but also the PG and GT divisions have increased receivables, particularly related to China. We have on the investing side, divested AEI during the year. Last year we had a large acquisition incoming instead. The company stays strong and we have a net cash reported of SEK 505 million. This would enable us to take advantage of any opportunities as well as protect us from any risk scenarios in the short to mid-term. With that, I hand back the word to Anders. Thank you, okay. This is the last from me, so I want to say a few things about sustainability and give an example on what we are working on right now. We have announced, and this was announced before, among other targets that we have on sustainability, one of them is that we want to halve our carbon dioxide emissions from our own operations, and this should be done at the latest by 2030. If we analyze our emissions, what they originate from, we could see that the freight is a major part of that, and especially air freight. This has to be reduced in all divisions in order to reach this target. To support that, we have initiated a study to see what kind of opportunities do we have to reduce emissions with alternative ways of transportation, alternative flows of products and goods and et cetera and so on. We see that the study will be completed in the third quarter this year and will support the divisions in their ongoing work to reduce emissions. Good step forward on this. All right, so that was the last piece of the presentation, Sven. Thank you, Anders and Pierre. Now we're moving over to our Q&A session. Operator, we are ready to take questions, please. Anyone with a question may press star one at this time. The first question comes from Mikael Laséen from Carnegie. Please go ahead. Yes, thank you. Good morning. I have quite a few number of questions here, but I'll start with the PG segment, the Pattern Generator segment. Can you talk to us about the market situation right now for the display photomask writers? You have interesting slides, for example, page 30. If you can elaborate on what you're seeing right now and how you see the timing of orders. All right. Yeah, first of all, the photomask market is quite strong. I think we had a growth last year of almost 14%, and this year on the forecast, 10%. Our customers have been doing and are doing very good. Both, you asked about the display, but it's both on the display side and on the semicon side, we could see. The numbers is not the same, but the market is good on both sides, I would say. It has been a while since we received a display order, but we see also now that the pipeline and the interest is there, which is quite strong. I would say very strong, and so on. Of course, we expect orders to come here. We haven't seen any change in the market when it comes to technology or alternative ways of producing. We still believe that laser writing of photomask is still the most efficient way to manufacture high-end displays. There has been no change either nor on the technology side or on the competitive landscape. It's more or less a question on timing on when our customers want to invest in a new production and new technology, and also in what type, of course. This shift from LCD to AMOLED or to high, more advanced displays is still going on. It was a little slower during the COVID times, but now it's again on the agenda. We look very positive to the future on this. The next question comes from Fredrik Lithell from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I have a specific question on the second quarter here. Just to get the figures right when it comes to the PG division, you had five SLX machines that you delivered, that you shipped, that you sort of revenue recognized. And then you have your aftermarket revenue. How, you know, when it comes to getting the SEK 348 million revenue number in place here, what was sort of... Did you have a lower ASP on the SLX machines, or did you have a substantially lower aftermarket revenue in the quarter compared to the Q1 2022 figure, for example? If you could sort of guide us a little bit through those details on the PG side on revenues. Thank you. Okay. There are, of course, differences even if you talk about the SLXs. There are quite a different price range, depending on which model is being shipped. I think we have disclosed intervals for all the machines that have been shipped. You could probably back calculate it from there. You can also see that in the order intake, which is a fair proxy for what the aftermarket is in a normal quarter, you can see the number. As we don't have any machine orders there. Okay. I can get sort of a proxy for the average price per SLX that you shipped in Q2, and then backtrack the aftermarket revenue that way? Yeah. Okay. Should be possible. They're not so many, so. As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one. The next question comes from Mikael Laséen from Carnegie. Please go ahead. Yeah, I have a few more. This potential listing of the High Volume segment, I'm curious, so the reasons for this, if you could comment on how this could add value for Mycronic shareholders and what type of competition that you see there. You mentioned quite a number of a few things that could, I mean, impact the segment. Have you noticed that already now, or do you expect that potentially to happen, or how should we look at that? Our intention is to investigate the possibility. There is no decision. We can see that the local Chinese competition have increased over the years in our dispensing with our dispensing technology. To continue to grow, we need to have access to the best people in China, in particular. We need to have access to the best production facilities and the best governmental support as well as customers and suppliers, of course. We could see that all those things are becoming easier for listed companies than for non-listed companies in China. Many of our local competitors are listed or have the intention to be listed. In many cases, we are second in line or even third in line, especially as being a foreign owned enterprise. This is also valid for acquisitions. We have been quite active in our search to acquire Axxon similar or similar to Axxon type of businesses in China, as we have had such good success with that company. Here we can see that the sellers prefer to sell to listed companies. Of course, it's easier to pay with shares, having a listing on the stock exchange. We believe that there are many benefits, and the shareholder benefit should be that we can continue to grow in a profitable way and generate profits. If it would be possible, and if it is a good idea, our intention is to float a very small part of the company. The minimum allowed is 10%, and we want to be a solid majority owner going forward as well. It's not significant. Okay. Can I ask one more? Yes. Please go ahead. Okay. When it comes to the High Volume segment, I'm curious about the first of all, the customer concentration, if you can say something about that, how many customers they have and how, sort of, the top five customers, how much they are generating. If you can talk about the electric car industry and how they are exposed to that, if this is something that is continuing or if it's a project-based phenomenon right now. I cannot answer in detail on all of that. If you take the majority of business is still in China, but we also continuously grow outside of China, which is taking a much bigger part. These applications for the customer segments are typically within consumer electronics, which is a high volume segment. It's very much around mobile phone, smartwatches, earbuds or earphones, AirPods, and computers and tablets and similar things. All the, if you would say top five customers and so on, they will be all the big names within this kind of products. Normally, they're sub-suppliers and not them directly, but the sub-supplier to the manufacturers of these kind of products. The business is very much product-driven, so from year to year, the top five changes normally. It's never the same top five or even top 10 because this business is very much large products and very much waves of technology. We could see that two years back, we had a big investment wave because of the 5G telephony technology came into place. Last year, we had a big investment wave in the AirPods, where every manufacturer wanted to have those in-ear small wireless earphones. Now it's very much driven by electric cars, as you said, and also smart watches and health devices. We believe that the electric car segment is still the electric car part of the total automotive manufacturing is still very small. This will continue to develop. I think that will be. It's already very important for us, but I think it will be even more important because the amount of electronics in an electric car is much, much higher than in a normal car, not only because of the drivetrain, but also because of more advanced control equipment, and so on. This is and will be a very important segment, and I think that is not going away very easily. Was there anything more in that question? I'm just curious about the top five customers, but yeah, that's fair enough. Not ready to explain that in detail. I have one more about the Global Technologies segment and the data center side. The recruitment situation there that larger data center cloud service providers are holding back the recruitment. How is that relevant for you? Can you explain that, please? I think it's not relevant, but we want to mention it so no one believes it's relevant, in a way, because we could see that there have been recruitment freezes by that. Those are typically our customers. We sell optoelectronics or assembly equipment for optoelectronics for companies providing Facebook and Google and such companies with communication devices. We have seen that our market has still been very strong on this one. This is despite that it's like the end customers seem to slow down a little bit on their, at least on the personnel side. It doesn't necessarily mean that they spend less on equipment, of course, but we just want to highlight this. Okay, good. Thank you very much. We have a follow-up question from Fredrik Lithell from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Yes. Thank you very much for taking a second one here. I was just thinking maybe you could help us through a little bit when it comes to Global Technologies. They had a very good quarter now, and Q1 is probably a seasonally weaker quarter. Is it? Should we think about it as seasonal swing factors between the quarters or is it lumped due to projects of scale that you sort of revenue recognize and thereby Q2 was, you know, higher than Q1? How should we sort of gauge in between the different quarters? I think the most important number here will be the backlog. Our deviation on quarter is our ability to deliver from that backlog. We had much higher constraints in production in the quarter one with more problems than now when it comes to material shortage, personnel shortage, logistic challenges and so on, which has becoming much better for us in this division. We were able to deliver much more equipment in the second quarter than in the first quarter. It's not really because of the market. In this case, it was more our own ability to deliver that was influencing this. Okay. Is it fair to assume that in a normal world, if you wouldn't have the constraints on the supply side, the order backlog would signal better than what net sales should be at what level, because you deliver what you receive in orders, you deliver pretty much in one quarter? Not necessarily. Depends a little bit on the timing, of course, and there is lead timing in here. I think as long as the backlog is bigger than the order intake over some time, we should be able to have positive sales because if there are no production constraints. When it comes to the gross margin here, 41%, is that an effect of the volumes or is it sort of better prices or something else behind the improvement in the gross margin then? It is, it's the level where we should be, you can say a little bit, because with too low volumes, of course, we get under absorption in the production facility and so on. Now we're running at the level as we want to. Of course, this also depends on product mix, to quite some extent. I don't know exactly how much that was impacting on this quarter. Maybe, Pierre, you have some idea. We have a little bit positive effect on the electrical testing side by having a lower margin from one of the segments which did not have much sales in this quarter. Generally speaking, we should be on the 40% level. Okay. Okay, perfect. Thank you very much. For any further question, please press star and one. Star followed by one. Gentlemen, so far there are no more questions. With that, we have then reached the end of today's presentation. However, before we end, I would like to remind you that Mycronic invites institutional investors, analysts, and media representatives to our Capital Markets Day on Monday, September 5th, as Anders also mentioned earlier in the presentation. The Capital Markets Day will take place at our headquarters in Täby, just outside Stockholm, and will include a demo of some of our machines and a production tour. It will also be streamed live for those who cannot participate in person. Just a reminder that you can sign up on our website under Investors. Thank you very much for attending today.