Good morning and a warm welcome to the presentation of Skanska's Q4 report for 2024. I'm Antonia Junelind, I'm the Senior Vice President for Skanska's Investor Relations. And here on stage in our studio in Stockholm today is our President and CEO, Anders Danielsson, and Acting CFO responsible for the year-end report, Pontus Winqvist. Shortly, they will take you through an update in relation to business performance, financials, and the market outlook. And after the initial presentation, we will move over to your questions. If you're watching us online, then I encourage you to join our web audio link and use the telephone conference number to ask questions. You can follow the instructions by the operator there. But we will get back to you when we are opening for Q&A. So with that short introduction, I will hand over to you, Anders. Thank you, Antonia. Before we go into the report, I want you to look at the picture here on the right. It's a project that we're building. It's a new railway connection between New Jersey and Manhattan, and you can see here the bridge arches that are actually prefabricated upstate New York and then taken down by the Hudson River to the site and assembled on site. Great project. If I summarize the Q4, it's a strong quarter. We have a strong performance in the construction stream. We have a record high order backlog, and we also see some gradual improvement in the project development, which is encouraging. Growing the investment property portfolio also in the Q4. Operating margin in construction, 4.5% in the Q4 and compared to 4.4% last year. And if you look at the full year, we have a 3.5% operating margin, which is in line with our target. So strong performance. Return on capital employed in project development, that's included residential and commercial, it's 2.6% on a rolling 12. Not at our target level, but improving. Return on capital employed in investment properties, 4.6%. Here we have a target of 6%. So also there we are improving on a rolling 12. Return on equity, 10% on a rolling 12. And we maintain the robust financial position, which is extremely important and also a competitive advantage for us. The board has proposed a dividend of SEK 8 per share. And we also are in line with our target of reducing carbon emission, and now we have reduced it with 61% compared to the baseline year 2015. So if I go into each stream, starting with construction, we increased the revenue in the quarter, and we have very strong order bookings. So we have a book- to- build 123% on a rolling 12, which is really strong and giving us a record high order backlog of SEK 285 billion. Operating income over SEK 2 billion, also a good increase here. Again, the operating margin 4.5%. And we can see that it is a strong delivery in all markets. And overall, on a 12-month basis, we are in line with our target. I'll move over to residential development. Also here, we can see increased revenue since we are selling more apartments, more homes. And we also started more homes, which we have said a couple of quarters now that this is a priority for us to be able to gain profit in the future as well from this. We are well positioned. We have an operating income of just shy of SEK 200 million, giving us a ROCE of 1.6% in rolling 12. We continue to see a stable market in Central Europe that has been stable for some time now, which is good. We also see gradual improving in the Nordics, but from low levels, and we expect it to take some time before we're coming back to normal levels. We're starting projects in all home markets, also important. We can see that we have an operating margin of 8%. A bit below our target of 10%, but encouraging to see that we're holding up the profitability here. Commercial property development, operating income over SEK 300 million in the quarter. We have a gain on sale of SEK 561 million. Return on capital employed of 3% on rolling 12. We have 15 ongoing projects, which corresponds to just over SEK 20 billion in total investment upon completion. We have 24 completed projects corresponding to almost SEK 13 billion in total investment, which of those we have a 65% lease ratio. We're coming back to that. Five projects, we have divested five projects in the quarter, one internally to our investment property portfolio and the rest externally. We're also starting, we have said that earlier, we prioritize starting projects. We have started three projects in Finland, Sweden, and Hungary during the Q4. Going, moving on to investment properties. Here we have a stable operating income of SEK 74 million in the quarter. The leasing ratio in the current portfolio, 87%. We added one project, Property Oas in Malmö. So now we have seven projects altogether in the portfolio with a value of SEK 8.2 billion. I'm coming back now to construction, moving into order bookings. Here you can see the order bookings trends over five years, and as you can see, the blue bar is the order backlog, which is on record high level and really strong order intake here. You can see the gray line, the order bookings on the rolling 12-month basis, steady the last few years in the upwards trend, so that's going. We can go into each geography as well on the next slide. Here you see overall 123% book-to-build, very strong, and also overall, good 93% in the Nordics, just over 100% in Sweden. Also Europe has picked up. You can see we actually increased it somewhat compared to the year before, so overall, very good position. It's extremely high, of course, in the US, 152%, which gives us 24 months of production. But you should also remember that the U.S. order backlog has a longer duration now than we have seen before. And also longer duration compared to the European one, the Nordic and Europe. But strong overall. With that, I hand over to Pontus to give us some more. Thank you, Anders. Then starting with construction, as you can see, we had a revenue in the Q4 of SEK 47 billion compared to SEK 41.6 billion the same quarter last year. That's an increase with 13%. And of those 13%, 1% is related to currency. For the full year, revenue increased by 5% in both local currencies and in Swedish kronor. Operating income then increased in the Q4 to SEK 2.1 billion, an increase by 15% compared to the Q4 last year. And as Anders said earlier, this results in an operating margin of 4.5% for the quarter and 3.5% for the full year, which is in line with our financial targets. Looking then into the different geographies, you can see that we in the Q4 actually had an operating margin that's well above 4%. You can also see that the operating income in all geographies are increasing compared to the Q4 last year. So strong delivery from our construction business. Going then into residential development, here you can also see that there is quite an increase of the revenue. It's 30% compared to last year. And that we are increasing our sales, of course, is a result of that. You can also see that the S&A percentage has come down quite a lot. It's now on 5.7%. And that is, of course, a result of that we have been working with adjusting the business to have a good level of, or a good organization, but that also is ready to ramp up when we are continuing to start more projects going forward. Regarding the result here, it's impacted by operational losses from BoKlok of SEK 60 million, but it also impacted by release of provisions of around the same amount. And those releases are spread on the different geographies. So they take out each other. So the underlying 8% is quite representative for the business right now. And if you look into the different geographies, you can see that it is a small negative in Sweden, but that's impacted then of BoKlok. Also then both the Nordics and Europe has an impact of BoKlok. And then, as I said, you have those releases of provisions that spread around in the geographies. And blended margin then of 8% for the residential business. Going into the homes started and sold, you can see that we are actually increasing both when it comes to started and sold. We have started projects in the Q4 in all geographies. We sold 573 homes then in the Q4. The market, it has improved, but it's still not good. It's slightly on an improving basis, but we are not where we would like to be long term yet. Looking then into the number of homes in production, so you can see that we are on the same level as we were in the Q4, but we have completed a number of homes, but also then, as I said earlier, started new projects in all our geographies. Regarding the sales rate, we have a sales rate of 52%, and that's also that is the same level as we had by the close of Q3. Going then into commercial development or commercial property development, you can see here that we have a revenue of SEK 3.5 billion, or 3.6 actually. We divested five projects, of which one was internal. Of the divestment value of SEK 3.3 billion, we had SEK 561 million in gains. A part of that gain is coming from release of provisions from older divested projects. So basically, it's risk that has disappeared from those projects and that we have released during the Q4. So don't expect the 561 be representative for what we have in the portfolio. Looking into the unrealized gains then of the existing portfolio, here you can see that the top of the bar there in Q4, which is represented the completed, has decreased somewhat. And that is since we have divested properties during the Q4. Then we have added on the light blue part, which is then the ongoing properties that has been added on here because we have started. This quite busy slide is then showing the completion profile of our unsold properties or unsold projects, and you can see in the Q4 where it has actually increased since the Q3 because we have then during the Q4 completed a couple of projects, which also has an impact of the leasing ratio in those projects, which has gone down from 75% to 65% because we have sold projects with higher leasing ratio compared to the new added project in the portfolio that has somewhat lower leasing ratio. Yes. Looking then into the leasing ratio, so you can see that we have continued to have a stable leasing ratio. 64% is the leasing ratio, and you can also see that there is a decline in the completion ratio because we have then started new projects, which then takes down the completion ratio in the portfolio. But we keep the occupancy rate higher than the completion rate. IP then, investment properties, stable delivery, but it is also, of course, a stable business. We have added on one project that was divested from CD into IP during the quarter, Oas in Malmö. And we are delivering an operating income on the same level as we did in the Q4 of SEK 74 billion. You can also see then that we have a good occupancy rate in this portfolio of 87%. So for the full group then, you see that we had an operating income of SEK 2.7 billion. Just looking into the Q4 last year, it's worth to remember that that quarter was impacted of write-downs in the property portfolio and also the divestment of the LaGuardia project coming from asset management. Then we are delivering SEK 2.7 billion in operating income. We have a tax of SEK 647 million, which represents 22% in the quarter and 25% for the full year. You might remember that we had a little bit of a higher tax rate in the Q3, but now I would say this is quite representative for the business that we have right now, which means less profits coming out from tax-free property divestment and a higher proportion of profits coming in from the US business, where we still, I would say still have a higher tax rate than the other parts of the business. Cash flow. We had a strong cash flow in the Q4, operating cash flow of SEK 5.1 billion. This is then coming from continued strong cash delivery within the working capital from construction. Added to that, we have divested more than we have invested. Those two parts are continuing in the Q4 to deliver a strong cash situation. Going then into the free working capital, you can see here that we have SEK 34.5 billion in free working capital. I would say that that is a record high level in absolute terms. It's an increase from SEK 31 billion in the Q3. We have the currency effect in this. You can say of that increase, around SEK 1.3 billion is currencies because a lot of the free working capital then is coming from the U.S. business and the development in the Q4 was weak or the Swedish krona was weak. Also, the relative ratio here, 17.5% compared to 17.4% free working capital compared to the revenue is strong. And I think I said in the Q3 that we had a lot of mobilization payments, et cetera, that was contributing to the strong cash flow in the Q3. That's true. But in the Q4 then, we have also had quite a lot of, you can say, too early payments from a number of clients, which boosted the cash flow here or the working capital in the Q4. So I don't think we shall expect this amount of SEK 34.5 billion to continue in the first and the Q2. Investments and divestments, and as I said earlier here, you can see that we have had a net divestment situation during the last quarter. And going forward, I think that we are starting more projects both in CD and RD. So we shall expect that investment pace is increasing somewhat. When it comes to the divestments, they tend to be a little bit bumpy. So it might differ between the different quarters when those are coming. Of course, this strong cash flow also impacts the liquidity situation. So we have an increase here since the Q3 of almost SEK 5 billion in liquidity. We say that we have available funds of SEK 28.6 billion. And we also have quite a good maturity profile of our outstanding debt. So the liquidity seems to be in good shape. Going then into the financial position, and of course, this cash flow then has contributed to an improved and strong financial position where our net financial receivable has increased from SEK 6.5 billion in the Q3 to SEK 12 billion by the closing of the Q4. So you can see even if the assets have increased, also the equity are increasing. So we have a stable equity to asset ratio here of above 36%. So by that, I leave it to you, Anders, talk a little bit about the market. Yes. So I will go over the market outlook. And starting with construction, we can see continued strong market in the U.S., both when it comes to civil and our building operation. We are located in the right geographies and in the right segments. So we believe it will continue to be strong. We see a stable market in civil in Europe, most of the countries. And we changed a couple of indicators here. We improved the outlook for Finland somewhat. We can see more projects coming out now in the coming year. And also somewhat fewer projects in Norway, which has been a strong civil market for some time. But it's still stable. So overall, a stable civil market. Somewhat continued to be unchanged weak for the rest of Europe when it comes to building, and residential development also, the overall weak market outlook in the Nordics. Having said that, we have seen some improvements, but we believe it will take some time before we are back on normal levels here in Europe, but of course, interest rate cuts helps the market, and we do see an underlying need for apartments in the Nordics. The Central European market, residential market is continued to be stable, and we are operating mainly in Poland and Czech Republic, and it's good places for us to be in. Commercial property development, we see transaction market is coming back somewhat in Europe. You could see our divestment here lagging a bit in the US due to the interest rate situation there. But the occupier market, the leasing market is stable in Europe and also improving in the U.S. So that's encouraging. More and more large companies requiring their employees to come back to the office five days a week. And that also helps us. But it is a polarized market. And flight to quality is really clear. And that's exactly the type of product we can offer the market. So that's beneficial for us. Investment properties, we believe it will be a stable market. Also here, a polarized occupier market. Our contracts go to where we have really high quality in the good locations, which we have. And rents are expected to be stable in investment properties. To sum up this presentation, there is a strong performance for the group. Construction has a really good quarter this time as well and a record high order backlog and gradual improvement of the transaction market for project development. We continue to grow the investment properties as planned. We will continue to do that. We are maintaining a robust financial position. The board again has proposed a dividend of 8 crowns per share. With that, I hand over to Antonia to open up the Q&A. Thank you, Anders. Yes, so now we will open up for your questions. As I mentioned before, if you're watching us online, then please use the web audio link or the provided telephone conference number. The operator will provide you with detailed instructions and put you through to us here in the studio. If you are joining us here in Stockholm, then I will ask you to just please raise your hand. We will bring a microphone so that we can hear your question very well. I will start by asking you to then state your name and organization. We have a question here in the front. Okay, Stefan Andersson, Danske Bank. First question on the order intake. Looking at what you've announced already in Q1, I think it's SEK 12.5 billion. Looking back, the average is SEK 1.2 billion-SEK 1.5 billion. So I mean, it's 10 times the size. Is that just a coincidence temporarily or has it been that strong entering 2025? If you look at the 2024, we have the majority order intake is in U.S. We have larger projects in the U.S. So I would say the market continues to be strong, definitely. And then on construction as well, looking at the margins, just taking it year on year, the U.S. is down a little bit and Sweden is up a little bit. And looking at what Peab said, they see a little bit of pressure in Sweden. So one question is, do you see pressure in the Nordics on the tendering? And then secondly, in the U.S., is there an effect of you ramping up projects and being cautious in profit taking in the beginning? Or is that a misunderstanding from my side? If I start with Sweden, I would say on the infrastructure it's a stable market. So we don't see any changes in the pressure really in Sweden. If I go to the U.S., if you look at the profit takeout that we have, so of course when we are starting up projects, large projects, we are a bit conservative in the early days of the project. That's how we work. And you can see it also in the trend. And I know you want us to keep it short with maximum three. So I'll take the last one as well. Capacity-wise, I mean, you have had a phenomenal order intake in the U.S. You have 24 months of production there. Could you maybe elaborate on your ability to take on more in that market? Yeah, we are very careful before we even bid for a project that we should have the right team in place and we should have also the right suppliers and securing that. And we do have that. But as I said earlier, it's a long duration of the 24 months. So we still have capacity and we go in for a project. But we are selective. I can say that. We are selective. We go in for a project where we see that we have a competitive advantage. We have the right team in place. And so we can secure a good margin. Thank you. Very good. So then we'll move over to the online audience. Operator, can you please introduce the next caller? Okay, thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the queue, you can press star and two. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. The first question comes from the line of Sirwan Tucker from SEB. Please go ahead. Yes, thank you and good morning. I have a couple of questions. First of all, these provisions that you have in RD, first of all, would you say that these types of provisions are something that could be recurring or is it just a specific item for Q4? Hi, yes. I would say that those are not recurring. So there have been some release of provision because we were forecasting or were afraid of a somewhat poorer market than it actually was. So then it was a possibility to release those in the Q4. But don't expect that to continue to happen. Yes. And also a follow-up question on that because you mentioned that the underlying margin, which is representative, is about 8% for RD. But could you maybe give some type of outlook on the BoKlok, which continues to incur losses this quarter? Yeah, when it comes to those losses, it's mostly related to that the BoKlok business will be transferred into the Swedish business. And of course, there are costs connected to that transfer. Then we won't run a business that is not contributing to the result long term. But from this year, it will be embedded in the Swedish RD business. So we won't see BoKlok anymore from a report perspective. Okay, good. Also have another question on these provisions because in CD you have these gains, which is SEK 561 million in the quarter. What is the adjusted divestment gain if you exclude these provisions? I would say that you could calculate on that the underlying gain is, or divestment gain is, low double-digit%. Okay. And you asked also a question on the central eliminations, which seem to be quite low on both revenue. And then you also have some type of SEK 8-9 million positive impact also. But could you clarify what types of one-off items there might be in central eliminations? And what can we say about going forward? No, I guess you are referring to the SEK 89 million. That is, it's not a one-off effect. It is a one-off effect this quarter, but it could happen other quarter. And that's related to, it's complicated. It's when we have higher capitalized from the beginning, capitalized more interest than we have costs of interest, then we have to take that over capitalization to reduce that. That happened last year and booked a debt on that. Then one year later, we have to release that. So you can say in the case that we were capitalizing more from the beginning than we had in interest rate costs, then that will happen. I can say that this is not likely to happen during this year. So it needs to be certain circumstances before that is happening. And yeah, we don't see it will happen during this year. So treat it as a one-off in eliminations. Okay, good. And you asked one final question here because you state that you will have SEK 3.1 billion in cash flows in H1 from handovers in CD. Could you say anything about investment? Should we expect net divestment cash flow in H1 or do you plan to increase investment? As I said earlier, we are planning to increase investment both in RD and CD. When it comes to divestments, it's harder to predict when they will come. So therefore, it can be quarters with net investments, but it can be other quarters with net divestments. But the investment pace will increase. Okay, good. Thank you. Those were my questions. The next question comes from the line of Graham Hunt from Jefferies. Please go ahead. Thank you very much. I'll go one by one. I just have three questions. Firstly, could I ask about how you're thinking about investment from here in terms of the types of assets you're looking to develop over the next or your next investment cycle? Our commercial office space is still an area you want to invest in. What would be the alternatives that you're considering or that we could see go into the portfolio over the next few years? Yeah, hello Graham, I can take that. In the commercial development operation, we continue to believe in the office market long term, and we have seen that we have made good divestment of those during, especially in Europe and Nordics, but we also have said that we will try to diversify the portfolios on what we are looking into life science, for example, in parts of the US. We also have started some multi-family residential for rental use, and that's also a good market, so I expect the market to be somewhat more diversified going forward. Thanks. And then second question, just on data centers. We've heard a lot about this topic in the market of late. And we did see in your order intake, data center orders pick up into the end of 2024. Could you just remind us what your backlog exposure is there and how you see yourself positioned, particularly in the U.S. for this market going forward? We are well positioned when it comes to that segment in the market, especially in the U.S. where we see the strongest activity. And we have a good organization. We are multiple clients, repeat clients that want to build out. We see a strong pipeline. But also we are strong in other segments as well. We are in more traditional infrastructure, for example, roads and railways and so on. And we're also strong when it comes to schools, hospitals, universities, airports, and so on. So we are in the right places, but it's a very attractive segment, the data centers, and we expect it to continue over time. Got it. And last question, just on your outlook. I know that the U.K. isn't your biggest market, but interested to hear what your take is there and to see that you still see it as weak despite, I mean, we hear a lot of positive noises from the U.K. government. So just trying to understand a little bit about your caution there. Thanks. Yes, of course. It's for us an important market, one of our important home markets, and we believe in the market more long term. But we have seen some lack of pipeline for some time. It's really encouraging to hear the government wants to invest more in infrastructure. And we are strong. We have a strong organization, but we believe it will take some time before we see those projects materialize. So our outlook is 12 months ahead. And it takes, in my experience, it takes some more time before we really can start those projects. Got it. Understood. Thank you very much. Thanks. The next question comes from the line of Simon Mortensen from DNB Markets. Please go ahead. Hi, thank you. And congratulations with a great result. I think I'll follow up on the previous questions. And the market outlook, you have residential development and commercial development with a negative arrow unchanged from last quarter. But at the same time, you're saying you want to increase the investments in both commercial development and residential development with some footnotes on the weak rental markets, etc. But could you please give us the rationale for why you want to ramp things up given that you have this market outlook and what kind of exposures and geographies you then will be most active in given the current market outlook you just presented? Yeah, of course. I can take a stream by stream and start with residential. What we have seen now, the Central European market has been stable. So we have good sales in the Central European, good profitability as well, good return. So there, of course, we focus on starting projects in that market, and we have done so. But we also see an uptick in the sales in the Nordic market. And if you look at a couple of years back, we have not started so many projects. So we have started fewer projects than we have been able to sell. So now it's natural for us to pick up that so we can be. Our ambition is to be in balance there how much we sell and how much we start. So that's why we're saying we're going to prioritize to be selective in our starts, but that's going. On the commercial property development, we have started three new projects in the quarter, but that is in Europe and in the Nordics. And there we can see the transaction market has improved. We have been able to divest projects. We are focusing on lowering the sort of land bank somewhat and prioritizing which market we are in. But in the prioritized market, we want to start projects so we can gain from it in the future as well. So that is the rationale of that. And just to add on that, that we are not starting any project where we don't have the right financial fundamentals. So I mean, that's always a must in order to start, that the financials are the right, that they are delivering according to our targets. Okay, thank you. And that was kind of my biggest concern. You don't start if you started because you needed the work, but you clearly don't in the backlog. But another question. In commercial development, we see the leasing ratio dropping a bit back. And we see negative net leasing actually in your investment properties division. It's a small division, but given what we read about the market locally, could you please give us a bit of flavor on the net leasing situation as you experience it, especially also in the Nordics? If we start with the IP, yes, you are right that there is a small decrease in the occupancy rate there. But that is because there have been a number of small tenants that are under renegotiation. We don't know exactly what will happen with those. And then we have added one property with slightly lower leasing ratio. So I don't think it's any drama at all when it comes to IP. When you take the entire CD portfolio, we have leased 55,000 sq m during the quarter. So I think there we are continuing to delivering. But if you look into the completed portfolio within the CD portfolio, there was, of course, a couple of divestments of high-leased properties while a couple of not-as-high-leased properties went into the completed part. Okay, thank you. There were also my questions for this time. Okay, very good. So operator, can you just update me here? I had one more person in the queue and that disappeared. Do we have anyone queuing to ask questions now? Yes, we have a question from Arnaud Lehmann from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Good. Thank you very much. Good morning, everybody. A couple of questions on my side. Coming back on the construction business, in particular in the U.S., we've heard a lot of noise with the new administration and also sometimes disruption to payment of subcontractors. So I guess the first question is, have you seen any disruption on your side in terms of the public federal projects in terms of the way you are paid or the way the contracts are made? And do you see a risk that in the future, future contracts might be maybe less favorable for private companies working with the federal government? That's my first question, please. Yeah, no, we haven't seen any of that. We have a very stable operation. We have good contracts with the repeat clients in the U.S. on the public side. And we don't see any trend downwards when it comes to the pipeline either. So it continues to be strong and stable. Okay, thank you for that. And my second question is on commercial development. You highlighted that there were a few provisions in Q4. What would be the, let's say, normalized development margins for future projects that you might be selling? Are you saying that, let's say, low double digit is a new normal for commercial development, or at least for 2025 in terms of what you might be able to sell? I can start with that one. We have a target of the return. The return should be at least 10% on the capital we employed. We haven't changed that target. So coming back to the previous question, we will start projects selectively where we see we have the business case in place. So we haven't changed our target there. But we don't give any forecast either. Fair enough. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, there are no more questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Antonia Junelind for any closing remarks. Fantastic. Thank you very much. So this means that we've answered all of your questions. Then I want to take the opportunity to say thank you, Anders and Pontus, for your presentations and your answers here today. And thank you to all of you that joined us here in the studio for this live event. Lastly, thanks to those of you that have been watching. A recorded version of this broadcast will be available on our webpage later today. We will be back with more comments after the release of our Q1 report in May. Thank you. Have a lovely day.