Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Stora Enso's Q4 results presentation. Thank you for joining us today. I'm Hans Sohlström, the President and CEO of Stora Enso. I'm here with our CFO, Seppo Parvi, to take you through our performance and outlook before we take your questions. We start the presentation by taking a look at this image of the Earth Observatory on Svalbard in Norway. It's a prime examples of a building that must withstand harsh weather conditions, and it was constructed using cross-laminated timber from Stora Enso. Let's now shift our focus to our full year guidance. Our projected operational EBIT for this year is expected to be higher than the EUR 342 million achieved in 2023. In regard to our dividend, the board of directors has authorized a dividend distribution of EUR 0.10 per share in April and a potential second installment of EUR 0.20 per share to be paid latest in the fourth quarter of this year. This reflects our commitment to delivering value to shareholders despite the current market uncertainties. Stora Enso financial performance in the fourth quarter of 2023 was unsatisfactory, as it was affected by continued market headwinds. This especially impacted our packaging and wood products businesses. Group sales decreased year-on-year by 24% to approximately EUR 2.2 billion. Lower demand led to reduced deliveries and lower sales prices across all divisions, except for the Forest division. This resulted in an Operational EBIT of EUR 51 million, down from EUR 355 million a year ago, and with an Operational EBIT margin decreasing to 2.3%, down from 12.4%. On a positive note, the Operational EBIT improved sequentially with an increase of EUR 30 million. Cash flow from operations amounted to EUR 323 million in the fourth quarter, and EUR 954 million for the full year of 2023. We have focused on cash flow generation by reducing our operating working capital and reviewing our capital expenditure priorities. Towards the end of the year, we achieved a significant reduction in working capital to an all-time record low level. In the fourth quarter, the change in working capital was 207 million and decreased by 650 million from its peak in the first quarter of 2023. I'll now give you an overview of the main factors impacting our results. Our last quarter profitability declined significantly compared to a year ago. Despite our efforts to manage our product mix effectively, sales prices have decreased across all divisions, with the exception of forest. Lower demand led to decreased deliveries in all divisions. Apart from wood costs, many variable cost categories improved. However, total variable costs still increased by EUR 43 million. We have decreased fixed costs by EUR 112 million, which has been achieved through careful cost management and a reduction in maintenance expenses year on year. While we are disappointed by the overall reduction in profitability, to remain competitive and drive growth, Stora Enso will launch profit improvement program. I will come back to this topic later in the presentation. Let's now turn to the divisional overview. Starting with our Packaging Materials division, we continued to experience low market demand. In Consumer Board, the market stabilized at a low level. The containerboard and paper markets remained weak. Retail sales and private consumption are still under pressure. However, the most forward-looking indicator, ordering flow, improved slightly. Sales decreased by 22%, or EUR 290 million, to approximately EUR 1 billion year-on-year. Sales and profitability were impacted by lower containerboard and paper prices and lower volumes of consumer board. As a result, Operational EBIT dropped to -EUR 43 million. While we were able to decrease variable and fixed costs, excluding fiber, it was not enough to compensate for the revenue loss. We also had annual maintenance shutdowns in large units in Consumer Board, with startup challenges impacting profitability. The restructuring actions announced in June 2023 are now completed. The whole container board unit in the Netherlands and one book paper machine in Anjalankoski, Finland were permanently closed during the quarter. Next up is our Packaging Solutions segment, which experienced ongoing weak market conditions and price pressure on all markets. Sales increased by 40%, or EUR 70 million to EUR 247 million, driven by the acquisition of the De Jong Packaging Group, which we now call Business Unit Western Europe. Despite the ongoing market pressures on prices driven by overcapacity, the demand stabilized on low levels across most markets and segments. Operational EBIT increased slightly to EUR 6 million. Year-on-year, we saw improvements in all markets except for the seasonally driven fresh product segments, such as fruit, vegetables, and flowers in Western Europe. Proactive cost mitigation actions supported the result development. Let's have a look at what happened in the pulp market in the quarter. Our Biomaterials division showed modest improvement from the previous quarter, supported by some positive price changes, and global pulp inventories falling below the five-year average. However, market conditions remained uncertain, and the underlying demand continued at a relatively weak level. Sales decreased from the all-time high quarterly sales in the fourth quarter of 2022 by 42% to EUR 375 million. Sales prices were significantly lower due to continued weak demand, especially for the board and paper segments. End-use demand for tissue, personal care products, and specialties remained stable. Deliveries declined due to the closure of the Sunila pulp mill and the annual maintenance shutdowns at the Enocell site. Additionally, variable costs were higher, impacted by somewhat higher wood costs. As a result, our Operational EBIT decreased to EUR 35 million from an all-time high in the fourth quarter of 2022. However, sequentially, the Operational EBIT improved by EUR 30 million. Now, let's take a look at the development in our Wood Products division. The Wood Products division continued to face weak market demand at low margins, but in the traditional both in the traditional and in the Building Solutions markets. We saw stabilization in the traditional wood products business after a rapid decline in demand over the past few quarters. However, the Building Solutions business is still under pressure. A substantial decline in building permits and projects has reduced the demand for cross-laminated timber and laminated veneer lumber. The Eurozone construction confidence is negative, and building permits have declined compared to last year. Construction activity, which represent around 80% of the market driver for this division, remains low. As a result, our sales decreased by 28% to EUR 341 million, and our Operational EBIT decreased to -EUR 27 million. We took cost mitigation actions and production curtailments to adjust to the weaker market. Forest division continued to be our most solid profit generator. The Forest division had a solid performance in the fourth quarter. The wood market in the Baltics and Nordics remained tight, especially for pulpwood in Finland and sawlogs in Sweden, due to high industrial and energy wood demand. Wood prices increased, but the effect of higher wood prices was fully offset by lower volumes. Sales decreased by 2% to EUR 650 million. Flexible use of the group's own forests and efficient wood sourcing continued to secure reliable wood supply. Operational EBIT of EUR 75 million was an increase of 22%, and it reflects resilient and strong operational performance in the group's forest assets. This operational EBIT in the quarter was a record result for the Forest division. With this in mind, let's take a look at how the fair value of Stora Enso's forest assets developed. We are pleased to report an increase in the value of our forest assets, which reflects the strength of our holdings. Our forest portfolio grew in value by EUR 393 million year- on- year to EUR 8.7 billion, equivalent to EUR 11 per share. Quarter on quarter, the increase was EUR 476 million, driven by market transaction price increases and a positive currency effect from the Swedish krona. So how can we further monetize on our forest assets? Our ambition is to significantly increase our involvement in wind energy on our forest land to 5-10 TWh from the 1 TWh we have today. We plan to start ramping up from 2030 onwards. The total potential for wind power production on Stora Enso's land in Sweden is estimated to be 75 TWh annually, of which at least 30% of the full potential can be realized long term. Our recent agreement to develop about 1,000 megawatts with the Swedish renewable energy company OX2 is a step towards achieving our ambition. Now, on to the next point, what our focus and action points to improve profits and strengthen our competitiveness are. We plan to initiate a new profit improvement program that will target an annualized EUR 80 million Operational EBIT improvement. This is essential due to the continued weak and uncertain market environment we are facing. There may be potential reductions of approximately 1,000 employees across all divisions and group functions, but important to note, without any production site closure. We expect that the majority of savings from these initiatives could materialize in 2025. Although difficult, this plan is necessary to ensure our long-term success and competitiveness. Our new program builds on last year's restructuring initiative, identifying synergies and focusing on core business activities aligned with our strategy. It is also allowing us to pursue this new program aided, aimed at achieving greater efficiencies. Last year's restructuring program resulting in an annual operational EBIT improvement of EUR 110 million, along with a reduction of about 1,150 employees, together with site closures and capacity cuts. And now I will hand over to Seppo to go more into the financial details. So over to you, Seppo. ... Thank you, Hans. We have already covered the proposed dividend of EUR 0.10 a share, payable shortly after the AGM, an additional up to EUR 0.20 a share at the board's discretion by the end of 2024. Dividend is down from the year before due to the weak results in 2023. So let's go into our long-term financial targets. Due to challenging business environment and unsatisfactory financial performance, we are not reaching our long-term targets. And as you just heard from Hans, we are taking further actions to strengthen the balance sheet and to strengthen the business short, medium, or long term in order to turn around the negative trend, as well as to improve long-term competitiveness. Very critical going forward is a healthy balance. Our target for net debt to EBITDA remains to be below 2x, even though the ratio increased from the previous quarter now and ended up at 3.2x. One of our focus areas is to release capital through working capital management and divestments like Beihai. These actions are helping us also to reduce leverage and to increase liquidity. All divisions, with the exception of the strong performance in the forest division, are falling behind the return of capital targets. Next, let's take a closer look at our capital allocations. During 2023, capital expenditures amounted to EUR 1,125 million, increase of 45% from prior year. This is mainly due to the consumer board investment at the Oulu site in Finland. This year, 2024, we estimate to continue on a CapEx level of EUR 1 billion-EUR 1.1 billion, as the Oulu investment is moving ahead according to the schedule, as well as its function. Production in Oulu is expected to start during 2025. One of our long-term targets is to keep CapEx at or below depreciation over the cycle. After larger strategic investments, such as Oulu investment now, we aim to quickly revert to the average range of EUR 600 million-EUR 800 million after 2024. Due to the current business environment and to protect our balance sheet and cash flow, we are continuing to be restrictive on new strategic CapEx initiatives for the foreseeable future. Let's now take a close look at the cash flow. In the current challenging market conditions, weak financial performance as strategic investments have created short-term pressure on our cash flow and balance sheet. We are focused... Last year, we continued to focus on the cash flow generation by reducing operating working capital and reviewing our capital expenditure priorities. A significant working capital reduction was achieved towards the end of the year, reducing working capital by EUR 650 million from the peak in the first quarter in 2023. We have put a lot of focus on cash flow and working capital, as I said, and I have to say here that the organization has done excellent job in addressing working capital, and the work continues. Cash flow from operations amounted to EUR 323 million in the fourth quarter, and EUR 954 million for the full year 2023. We continued to review our investment priorities for this year, 2024, as well as next year, 2025. Our liquidity position remains strong, so let's take a look at that next. We are maintaining our strong liquidity position to ensure that we have sources to meet our obligations and support our growth investment plans. We have currently about EUR 2.5 billion in cash and cash equivalents. We also have other unused credit facilities of up to EUR 1.9 billion. Important to note is also that there are no financial covenants, and we have investment grade, both from Fitch and Moody's. I will now hand back to you, Hans, to give an overview of our sustainability targets and the market demand outlook. Please. Thank you, Seppo. Sustainability is what drives our demand and growth. Sustainability is our strategic business enabler and a competitive advantage. We have clear and ambitious sustainability targets on climate, circularity, and biodiversity, and these will remain intact until we achieve them. Let's now look at how we are progressing. For climate, in the left-hand column, we are enhancing our energy efficiency and using more clean energy for Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and at the end of the fourth quarter, our production emissions were down by 41% compared to 2019. In the fourth quarter of 2023, we committed to another important target, when we committed to reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2040 through signing up to The Climate Pledge. For circularity, we have achieved 94% recyclability of our products last year and aim to reach 100% by 2030. To follow our development in biodiversity, we use impact indicators to monitor and report on the quality of our forestry operations on an annual basis. Our goal is to have a net positive effect of biodiversity in our own forests and plantations by 2050. Now, on the next topic, which is the market demand outlook. We do not expect the first quarter this year to show a significant market improvement following a historical low fourth quarter in 2023 and a slow recovery. For packaging materials, demand for consumer and container board is expected to remain stable. Nevertheless, the end of this stocking in the value chain during the first half of 2024 may support a slight recovery, especially in the consumer board segment. Demand for corrugated packaging in Europe is expected to be stronger, mainly due to the seasonally high greenhouse season. Pulp demand is expected to be slightly stronger with improving European operating rates. The demand in China is expected to be slightly weaker due to oversupply and a low season. Demand for sawn wood is expected to be stable, with some potential improvement due to increase in customer inventories. The Building Solutions segment is expecting weaker demand. Also, the demand for pulpwood is expected to be weaker, but still remains strong for pulpwood for energy use. While the sawlog market demand in Europe is expected to be weaker, but the tight Swedish sawlog market continues. I will now conclude before we move to the Q&A. To summarize what we have presented today, our determined focus on profit improvement, competitiveness, and cash flow through the recent restructuring program, resulting in an annual operating EBIT improvement of EUR 110 million, putting us on a strong path forward. We are now initiating a new profit improvement program, targeting to further improve our result by EUR 80 million annually through cost reductions. We believe that the proposed dividend distribution of EUR 0.10 per share in April, and a potential for a second installment of up to EUR 0.20 per share in the fourth quarter of this year, reflect our commitment to shareholder value despite the market uncertainty. Looking ahead, our cost reduction and growth initiatives have positioned us for higher operational EBIT in 2024 than in 2023, despite ongoing market volatility. We are committed to building a stronger future for our shareholders and the company, and we thank you for your attention today. We are now looking forward to hearing your questions and continuing the conversation. If you'd like to ask a question, please use the Raise Hand function at the bottom of your Zoom screen, or if you've dialed in, please press star nine. Please only ask a maximum of two questions at a time. If you wish to ask more than two questions, please rejoin the queue. Our first question is from Charlie Muir-Sands at BNP Paribas. Charlie, if you could please unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Yeah, thank you very much. Can you hear me okay? Yes, we hear you, Charlie. Yeah, great. Thank you. I've got lots of questions, but I promise I will stick to the two, as requested. Firstly, on the profit improvement program that targets the 80 million benefit, coming through starting in 2025, could you talk, please, about the potential costs of implementing that, in total and in cash cost terms, and how we should think about the phasing there? And then secondly, you flag, that you may consider paying up to EUR 0.20 per share for the dividend, later in the year. Can you just share some of the criteria, perhaps qualitatively, if not quantitatively, around how you might make that decision, given the balance sheet leverage and other considerations? Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, Charlie. Well, first of all, we don't disclose the estimated costs when it relates to the EUR 80 million new profit improvement program. But it will be... You know, the source for the cost savings will be employee reduction, FTE reductions. So that's the indication I can give. And if I may add there, you have to notice that we just announced the plan, and we now enter into more detailed planning, and then we will go through the union negotiations. And then, depending on outcome of those, as well as on the geographical split, that is still open also, that what kind of cost there will be, will be in connection to the program. So that's something we come back as we proceed with the program in the coming quarterly reports. When it comes to your question about the dividend proposal from the board of directors to the AGM, so the EUR 0.20 discretionary in the proposal for the end of the year, well, you know, I think it really reflects the dividend proposal reflects our commitment to create shareholder value. We know that the dividend is important for our shareholders, and... But on the same time, the visibility into the year, into the market conditions, geopolitics, macroeconomics, there is a lot of uncertainty there. So that's the reason why the dividend proposal has been constructed as it has been. Great. Thank you very much. Our next question is from Linus Larsson. Linus, if you could please press star nine to unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Yes, thank you very much. A couple of questions on the reshaping of your packaging materials division, if I may. First of all, if you could, maybe share with us, how the process regarding to the Beihai divestment is going, what's the book value of that asset? What's the interest that you're receiving in the market, and what's the timing that you expect on that divestment process, please? ... Yeah. Thank you, Linus. Well, first of all, as you can see from the report, Beihai is now defined as asset held for divestment. And clearly we are progressing here with... For us, it's much more important that we get the maximum value out of the deal than that it's a quick deal. So we are emphasizing that. Having said that, you know, we are progressing according to plan. And I guess that's about what we can say. Anything to add here? Well, like, like Lars mentioned, it's now classified as asset held for sale. In the balance sheet, actually, you see on the asset side, EUR 839 million value for assets held for sale. Thank you very much. And then, then on, on another part of that same division, Oulu, conversion, could you maybe share a bit more on where you are in that, investment project? How much has been spent? How much is still to be spent? And also, what are the current challenges? And, and, and if you could just give us a, a bit of a picture, how that, the project is, is ongoing. Yes, thank you, Linus. The Oulu investment project is progressing according to schedule, according to budget, in budget. I don't think we disclose any further details on the- We actually sort of rough guidance on the phasing. And I think if you look at where we are now in the project, we still have about a year to go before the ramp-up starts. So roughly half of the budget of the EUR 1 billion has been spent so far. Okay. That's helpful. Thanks a lot. Thank you. Our next question is from Samu Wilhelmsson from Nordea Markets. Samu, if you could please unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Yes, thank you very much for taking my question. Only one question from, from my side. Obviously, the balance sheet strengthening will be one of the key agendas going into 2024. And in terms of credit ratings, you have stated that you have the, quote, "ambition," to be Investment Grade and sustain Investment Grade metrics throughout the business cycles. But could you give us some more, more wording around that? Is this... Are you committed to Investment Grade rating, or how would you put some wording around that, given that you are exceeding your leverage targets, at least at the moment? Yeah, and of course, we are implementing actions, as you have seen in this report and previous reports, to first of all improve the profitability through the profit improvement programs, and then we are working to release capital. Like mentioned, we have put a lot of focus on reducing working capital, that is improving our cash flow, reducing net debt, as well as we are working on the divestments like Beihai. And I think that shows our commitment to work, to keep and improve our leverage when it comes to credit ratings. So we are taking actions, serious actions, to ensure that we remain in good shape. Okay, thanks. So basically, does that mean that if you have an ambition, basically, that if you would fall to a high-yield territory, that you wouldn't jeopardize your finances going forward? Well, I think if you look at our loan agreements, first of all, we have no governance, like I mentioned in my part. Looking at the credit rating, of course, it would have some effect on the price of the money you have to pay, but I think that when it comes to access to the market, that is not so critical. But of course, our ambition level is to remain and keep Investment Grade, and that's what we are working towards. All right. Thanks for the clarification. No further questions from my side. Just a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please use the Raise Hand function at the bottom of your Zoom screen, or if you've dialed in, please press star nine. Again, please only ask a maximum of two questions at a time. If you'd like to ask more than two questions, please rejoin the queue. Our next question is from Cole Hathorn at Jefferies. Cole, if you'd like to unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Morning. Thanks for taking my question. I'd just like a little bit of color on your 2024 outlook guidance. I mean, it's a little bit lower than probably, you know, for myself and some of the street were expecting it. Do you have specific views on kind of pricing that's embedded into that guidance? What I'm trying to understand is, you know, are you confident in delivering kind of towards the upper end of that kind of higher guidance and, you know, potentially seeing how the year develops, and then revisiting the market beyond that? Is the first question, so conservativeness of guidance. And the second one is on the CapEx. The CapEx number came in a little bit higher than what I expected. I'm just wanting to understand, you know, what's included in that 2024 CapEx guidance of EUR 1 billion. Thank you. Yes. Thank you, Cole. Well, regarding the outlook and the guidance, as we have also stated, I mean, there is not a lot of visibility into this year. Of course, we know how the beginning of the year looks like. But, you know, a year is a long period. We feel that this is a solid, good, you know, guidance that we can give at this stage. And regarding the capital expenditure, so we have the EUR 1.1 billion investment project ongoing in the new consumer board production line in Oulu. And as Seppo just stated, I mean, we're about halfway there when it comes to capital expenditure and cash out. There is still a significant part to be done during this year for the start-up, then as from the beginning of 2025. Anything Seppo want to add? Yeah, I think, I think capital expenditure range we are giving out for 2024 is pretty well in line what we have communicated earlier without giving the range. Reminding that we have this significant investment going on in Oulu, and, and ramp up is in 2025. And, and then other projects that I also mentioned is, for instance, our Skoghall project to increase capacity there at board machine number eight. And then we have Skutskär Bleach Plant and Enocel unbleached kraft pulp projects that are going on, as an example. But I think the main, main driver for the difference to sort of normalize level that, that I mentioned in, in one of the slides is coming from Oulu. Then maybe just as a follow-up, I mean, it's always difficult to do restructurings and, and reduce headcount, but I'm just, I'm just wondering, in your packaging materials division, you know, how can you improve kind of the operating rates or improve the mix of that business? I mean, did you consider potentially reducing some of your consumer board capacity, considering that you're going to be ramping up Oulu in, you know, 2025 onwards? Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, Cole. The new restructuring program doesn't include any plans for further or new capacity closures. It's a program which is focusing on the various synergies and efficiency improvement opportunities that we have identified since we moved into a decentralized, more decentralized P&L structure in November of last year. So clearly, during the last couple of months, we have learned, you know, how we can focus more on really driving profitability, serving our customers, operating our mills as effectively as possible, and that is the reason for this streamlining plan that we have announced. So it doesn't include any plans for further capacity closures or optimizations. Our next question is from Charlie Muir-Sands at BNP Paribas. Charlie, if you could please unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Hi there again. Two more questions for me, please. But firstly, with respect to your forest revaluation, I understand you use a sort of a three-year trailing average methodology. Just wondered if you could update us on where the forest valuation sits, though, versus the 2023 year-end position, given that some of the forest values in Sweden went up, but some went down in different counties last year. And secondly, just going back to Beihai, can you just clarify, since it's now held for sale, was it still consolidated during Q4? And, can you give us any guidance on what the deconsolidation impact will be on profits in 2024, or what it contributed to EBIT or EBIT loss in 2023? Thank you. First of all, when it comes to Beihai, so it's still fully consolidated. It's just balancing issue that we are marking as asset for sale. When it comes to other effects, that's something we come back to after, and when we are ready with the divestment, so we don't go further into details at this stage. When it comes to forest valuations, and you are right, there are differences between the regions in Sweden and inside the regions on different counties. And if you look at the areas where our forests are, so roughly, you could say that the prices have been fluctuating around zero, sort of from a couple percentage positive to couple percentage negative. And, as you know, we use three-year average, and that is a moving three-year average. And then, of course, the oldest ones are dropped out, and new ones are added, and that is how the average is then coming back. So last quarter, the prices dropped somewhat, but nothing radical, and there's still a good amount of deals done. So sample, we think, is still quite reliable and good. It's just come slightly down if you look at the number of deals, but nothing dramatic, at least in the regions where we have our forests. Great. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from Andrew Jones at UBS. Andrew, if you could please unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Hello, Andrew, are you able to unmute your line and ask your question? We'll move on, and we'll take our next question from Brian Morgan at Morgan Stanley. Brian, if you could unmute your line and ask your question, please. Thank you. ... Right. Can I just ask a point of clarification around your guidance for operational EBIT for 2024? When you say higher year-on-year, is that within the previously communicated band? So that would be 15%-50% higher year-on-year, just to clarify that. Yes, that's correct. That's perfect. That's all I wanted. Thank you. Guidance ranges are on our IR pages in the, on our web pages. Okay, cool. Thank you. Our next question comes from Robin Santavirta at Carnegie. Robin, if you could please press star six to unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Yes, thank you very much for taking my question, and hello, everybody. Now, first question I have is related to the outlook for pulpwood and log prices in Finland and Sweden for you guys at the moment. And what is the outlook going forward now in 2024? And what do you model in the guidance? Is it roughly in line with the current pricing, or is it up, or do you expect prices to start to decline? And can you also, sort of related to this, comment on what is the reason that prices of pulpwood in Scandinavia is so high? I do understand that we are not receiving the import from Russia, but I can also see operating rates very low in both Sweden and certainly in Finland. Why are prices not declining in wood raw material? Yes. Thank you, Robin. Well, you know, as we have stated, you know, the wood costs in the Nordic countries are on a high level, and we foresee at least now in the beginning of the year that they will remain stable on a high level. And you know, the reasons for is the very high wood costs in Finland, it is exactly as you say. I mean, there is Finland used to... Out of the supply in Finland, about one-tenth, about 10% used to come from Russia, and that stopped in 2022. So, there is less supply into the market. We have also some new capacity, pulp mill capacity, that has been starting up in Finland. I would say that it's a result of supply and demand. And also, we should remember that quite a lot of chips was also imported from Russia earlier to Finland and used by energy industry at the bio boilers. And also that has disappeared, not only pulpwood imports from Russia. And also, sawmilling volumes are down, so less chips and dust available from sawmills. And that then means that as they are short of raw material, then they are competing on pulpwood market with us and our competitors. Yeah, correct, Seppo. And, and also, if we look at the last years, there has been an increasing use of pulpwood for energy production purposes, so that has also impacted the market. I understand. Thanks. The second question I have is related to your forest assets. You have historically not gained sort of a lot of positive from that into your valuation, perhaps due to quite volatile margin performance in the industry. Now, could you consider to monetize a part of... I guess you want to, of course, hold the self-sufficiency, but monetize part of that forest assets to strengthen your balance sheet. Is that something that you are at all, you know, thinking about? Like we always said, we see forest as a strategic asset for us and part of our supply chain. But like always, and like earlier, we are of course doing this kind of forest land optimization, where we are selling some pieces of land which are logistically not at optimal places for our footprint, and then purchasing more if available closer to our mills to optimize the wood supply network that we have. So that kind of work we continue and do, depending a bit on opportunistic basis as well. I understand. Thank you very much. Our next question is from Cole Hathorn at Jefferies. Cole, if you could please unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you. Morning. Thank you for taking my follow-up. I'd just like a little bit more color on, you know, the outlook that you're seeing in the packaging materials division by end market. Any color would be helpful. I mean, we've seen some of your competitors announce that they've been able to achieve liquid packaging board price increases. I'd just like view on what you're seeing on pricing and volumes in LPB, what you're seeing on kind of the box board segment, and then container board or kraftliner, you know, where do you see inventory levels and demand into the new year, considering you're saying that there should be a bit of improvement in the box business in packaging solutions? Thank you. ... Yes. Thank you, Carl. Well, first of all, when it comes to our consumer board business, so including folding box board, liquid packaging board, and many other, let's say, higher added value board grades, you know, the price development has been more stable. And we have mainly been suffering, you know, from lower demand and lower volumes. And we see that there is, let's say, signs of destocking having come or coming to an end, which then could lead to some normalization, or let's say some stabilization of the markets. On the other hand, if you are looking to the really underlying demand driver, which is very much related to consumer spending and consumer confidence in the economic development, you know, there is not very strong signals either that the underlying demand would strengthen significantly. Then, in Container board, that's where there has been a more significant price drop during last year. And there also we saw earlier, let's say, a stabilization of market and destocking coming to an end already earlier of last year. And here, basically, we can also see that, you know, the stabilization is seen in some improved order inflow. But still, I mean, the underlying demand is very much driven by both consumer spending as well as industrial activity. Looking into these demand drivers, there is no fundamental change. I mean, of course, the easing of inflation, you know, the easing of interest rates at some point should have an impact also on consumer confidence and spending, but I think it's too early to draw any conclusions from that at this stage. So hopefully, this gave some additional flavor to your question. Thanks very much. And then just a clarification, you know, the Oulu investment for the box board machine, considering the investment in kind of the pulp mill and, you know, averaging fixed costs at that mill, it is right to assume that your, your kind of cost per ton of your kraftliner production at that site would also, substantially reduce? So you'd, you'd shift down your position on, on the cost curve on, on the kraftliner side as well at Oulu. Yes, that's correct, Carl. We have one last question from Linus Larsson. Linus, if you could please unmute your line and ask the question. Thank you. Thanks for taking a follow-up question from me. Just on the Forest Division, you talk about no major changes in the outlook. So I'm just curious to hear this EUR 75 million of EBIT in the fourth quarter, is that representative for the quarters ahead? I understand there was a bit of an uptick in the fair valuation compared to the third quarter. But what's the expectation on quarterly EBIT from the Forest Division in 2024, please? Well, we don't go into that deep, as you know, Linus. But as you know from history, forest division is quite a steady performer. Last quarter of 2023 was record high, and of course, it depends on the volumes, and prices have been high, as you know, when it comes to forest wood prices. And we have a lot of wood that we sell in Sweden forest, and Tornator, our selling company in Finland is benefiting, and that is reflected in the result. So like I said, quite steady performer, but notice it was record high. But it's quite steady business, and that's also why we like to own forest. Right. Thanks for that. Thank you. We have no further questions on the line now, so I will hand back to Hans Sohlström for closing remarks. Thank you. Well, thank you. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you for participating. And just as a final statement, you know, trust us, we will be remain very focused on profit improvement, competitiveness, and cash flow, and delivering shareholder value. Thank you very much for participation, and have a good day. Thank you.