Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I am Paulina, your Chorus Call operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the TUPRS conference call and live webcast to present and discuss the second quarter 2026 financial results. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Gökhan Dizemen, CFO, and Ms. Gülsen Ayaz, Investor Relations and Enterprise Risk Executive Director. Ms. Ayaz, you may now proceed. Hello, everyone. Good evening from Tüpraş headquarters in Istanbul, and welcome to our teleconference. Thank you for being with us today. I'm Gülsen Ayaz. As some of you already know, I have recently joined Tüpraş as the Investor Relations and Enterprise Risk Executive Director. I'm here with Gökhan Dizemen, our CFO, and my colleagues from Tüpraş IR and financial reporting. Over the next hour or so, we will review the second quarter industry backdrop and discuss our operational and financial performance, followed by a Q&A session. Before we'll start, I'll kindly draw your attention to our cautionary statement on page two. For further details beyond the scope of today's presentation, please refer to the financial report and material disclosures available on our website. Let's begin with an overview of the key developments in the global oil market and the Turkish macro environment, which together with the next slide, should provide useful context for understanding the sector dynamics as well as our performance in the reporting period. Brent crude prices remained highly volatile throughout the quarter, primarily driven by geopolitical developments in the Middle East. Following a sharp spike in April, prices eased on expectations of de-escalation between U.S. and Iran, coupled with weaker demand from China, before moving higher again as geopolitical tensions resurfaced towards the end of the quarter. Despite the volatility in Brent, though, our discipline in inventory management and hedging strategy helped mitigate the impact on our financial performance. While the global oil demand moderated in the second quarter, the decline in supply was significantly steeper, keeping the product markets fundamentally tight. Supply was further constrained by reduced refinery availability in the Middle East amid the regional conflict, alongside ongoing disruption in Russian refining, where roughly one-third of the capacity remained affected by drone attacks. Tightening product balances outweighed the decline in demand, providing sustained support for crack margins. At home, prudent and disciplined monetary stance has been maintained. The central bank revised its year-end inflation forecast to 26% from 16%, while keeping the policy rate unchanged at 37% to preserve the positive real interest rate environment and ensure macroeconomic stability. Overall fuel demand in Turkey remained over the first five months of 2026. While diesel demand softened modestly, continued strength in gasoline and jet fuel demand more than offset this shortfall. Diesel demand was weaker year-on-year in May, as expectations of lower prices stemming from a potential U.S.-Iran deal encouraged buyers to postpone their purchases. Moving on to the refining environment, global refinery capacity utilization rates declined sharply during the second quarter, falling below the lower end of the five-year range. The downturn was concentrated in the Middle East, Asia Pac, and CIS regions, where geopolitical tensions, refinery outages, and crude availability constraints disrupted operations. In contrast, refineries in Europe and North America modestly increased utilization rates, partially offsetting the loss of supply and preventing even higher crack margins. Tight product market conditions weighed on European inventory levels more visibly in the second quarter, with Europe sourcing around 40% of its jet fuel and 10% of its diesel from the Middle East. Disruptions to trade flows quickly translated into lower inventory levels and heightened supply concerns. Consequently, market focus has effectively shifted from crude availability to refined product availability. To offset lower jet fuel and diesel imports from the Middle East, Europe increased imports from the U.S., while European refiners shifted their production slate toward mid-distillates. Nevertheless, mid-distillate inventories recovered only modestly and remained below the five-year average throughout the quarter. Meanwhile, with refiners prioritizing mid-distillate yields ahead of the summer season, gasoline inventories continued to decline as demand accelerated with seasonality. As a result, crack margins significantly strengthened due to low utilization rates and declining inventories. Lower refinery utilization across key regions led to scarcity in refined products throughout the quarter, limiting Europe's ability to import. In this environment, mid-distillate crack margins averaged around $50.50 per barrel during the second quarter, remaining well above historical levels. Product markets tightened even further in July following Russia's continued refinery disruptions and diesel export restrictions, pushing mid-distillate cracks to $70.70 per barrel. For gasoline, after a seasonally weaker first quarter, margins recovered sharply in the second quarter and further increased to $44 per barrel in July, again surpassing the last five years' average. With inventories still constrained and peak season demand to come, we believe market fundamentals remain supportive of margins. Coming to the crack margins by product with the second quarter, diesel crack margins averaged $49 per barrel, significantly higher than the prior year and well above the five-year average, supported primarily by refinery disruptions, constrained product balances, and limited trade flows across key markets. Jet fuel cracks averaged $52 per barrel in a pressured market, again remaining well above the five-year range. Gasoline cracks averaged $24 per barrel, marking a year-on-year increase led by low inventories, seasonally high demand, and reduced gasoline output as refiners prioritized mid-distillate yields, as we discussed. Finally, HSFO cracks averaged around -$21 per barrel in the second quarter, down $15 per barrel compared to last year. Geopolitical disruptions hindered global shipping routes and reduced bunker demand for most of the quarter, resulting in notably weaker margins. That said, we have seen HSFO cracks turn less negative around a short period of opening of Hormuz. Geopolitical tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz significantly affected heavy crude differentials throughout the second quarter. Supply disruption concerns, which began to build in March, pushed heavy crude prices to their peak in May. Following the ceasefire, with improving diplomatic climate in late June and the partial resumption of flows through Hormuz, premiums gradually normalized through July. Elevated crude exports from Russia and softer demand from China were the other factors that helped. Oil Official Selling Prices also reflected this normalization. Throughout this period, we leveraged our diversified and flexible procurement to optimize our crude slate in response to evolving market conditions. While differentials normalized since May, June, renewed geopolitical tensions in July indicate that September OSPs could move higher. Now moving on to Tüpraş highlights for the second quarter. An optimized product mix, thanks to our refining flexibilities, carried our white product yield to 83%, the highest second quarter level since 2017, further strengthening value extraction during the quarter. We achieved a 96% capacity utilization rate in the reporting period, underscoring the resilience and reliability of our operations. At a time when many refineries around the world experienced lower utilization rates due to operational disruptions, we sustained high throughput levels, enabling us to fully capture seasonal demand, and most importantly, meet Türkiye's fuel needs without interruption. Finally, strong net refining margin, together with disciplined execution and cash management, further strengthened our financial position. We generated $1.6 billion EBITDA in the first half, up 120% year-on-year. $2.3 billion free cash flow in the first half not only covers the second dividend payment and the remaining CapEx for the year, but also presents a robust outlook on financial strength and future shareholder return. Maintaining a strong cash position provides us with further flexibility, and navigate market volatility, and seize emerging opportunities. On the refining side, our production was 6.9 million tons in the second quarter, parallel to 2024 and 2025 levels. In lack of any major refinery maintenance, we operated at near full capacity to capture strong demand conditions. Crude distillation utilization reached 86%, while the utilization rate for processing other feedstock stood at 9%. On the sales front, domestic and international volumes were 6.1 and 1.7 million tons respectively, summing up to 7.9 million tons in total, up 4% year-on-year. Domestic sales grew 5%, supported by strong diesel and gasoline volumes, up 9% and 7% respectively. Diesel sales outperformed the broader market trend, driven by our product slate optimization. Now, let's quickly look into the electricity operations. As you know, in this slide, we summarize the electricity production and sales activities of Entek and Tüpraş together. With the addition of 16-megawatt new capacity in Kırıkkale SPP, our total zero-carbon electricity generation capacity increased to 435 megawatts by the end of the quarter. In Q2, 69% of electricity generation in our facilities was from hydro, 18% from wind, and the rest from CCGT and solar. Total zero-carbon electricity from production stood at 389 gigawatt hours, of which around 10% was sold under the feed-in tariff, while the remainder was sold to the spot market. Despite higher electricity production year-on-year, EBITDA declined due to a softer pricing environment, but we expect a progressive EBITDA contribution from our electricity generation business in the second half as pricing conditions improve. Well, this concludes my remarks. I will now hand over to our CFO, who will take you through our financial performance and revised full-year outlooks. Thank you, Gülşen. Good evening, everyone, and thank you for joining our call. The second quarter benefited from a supportive refining environment, relentless optimization initiatives, and strong cash generation. Despite ongoing geopolitical volatility, we successfully leveraged our operational flexibility and diversified crude slates to capture favorable market conditions. We delivered another quarter of robust financial performance while further strengthening our balance sheets. All figures on this slide are presented under IAS 29 inflation accounting, with prior year figures restated for comparability. Net sales increased by 50% year-on-year on the back of stronger crack margins and higher sales volume. The cost of goods sold benefited from our well-diversified crude slate, underpinned by strong procurement expertise, operational flexibility, and broad market access. Throughout the quarter, we leveraged our diversified sourcing capabilities to navigate changing market conditions and enhance feedstock economics. Supported by stronger margins at 96% capacity utilization rate and a record-high second quarter-white product yield, operating profit increased nearly four-fold year-on-year to TRY 47 billion. Below the operating line, financial income improved year-on-year, primarily driven by higher net interest income on our cash balance. Profit before tax more than tripled year-on-year and reached to TRY 50 billion, driven largely by very strong operational performance. The effective tax rate declined compared to the first quarter, following a change in corporate tax legislation. Accordingly, the corporate tax rate applicable to income generated from manufacturing activities by companies holding an industrial registration certificate and actively engaged in manufacturing has been reduced from 25% to 11.5%, effective January 1st, 2027. While this amendment has no impact on the current tax expense, it has been reflected in the deferred tax calculations in the consolidated financial statements as of the second quarter through a one-time non-cash adjustment, which significantly reduced the effective tax rate. Accordingly, net profit reached to TRY 46 billion, while EBITDA increased to TRY 55 billion, representing around 180% year-on-year growth. Moving on to the drivers of profit before tax performance year-on-year, the main contributor was the significant improvement in refining profitability with stronger crack margins, adding TRY 52 billion year-on-year. Despite the pressure from higher crude oil prices, freight, and related costs, a proactively managed trade flow helped contain the negative impact coming from crude differentials to TRY 14.4 billion. Although Brent prices declined, the overall inventory effects remained relatively limited as the price impact was largely mitigated by foreign exchange movements and our hedging activity. Overall, despite the headwinds, our ability to leverage our core strengths and capitalize on favorable sector dynamics enabled us to deliver a more-than-threefold increase in profit before tax, driven entirely by operational performance. Moving on to the balance sheet items, net debt to EBITDA came in at -1.1 multiple as of the second quarter. Cash and cash equivalents and financial liabilities stood close to TRY 200 billion and TRY 70 billion respectively. We ended the quarter with a strong net cash position of TRY 130 billion, corresponding to around $2.8 billion. Working capital stood at TRY -34 billion thanks to successful management of payables and receivables in volatile dynamics. A better-than-expected working capital balance beyond seasonal factors was largely driven by the supportive operating environment. We do not view this as a sustainable level and expect working capital to gradually normalize toward our long-term objective of maintaining a neutral working capital position. Consistent with our policy of maintaining a square FX position, we ended the first half at target level through disciplined FX management. The next slide provides an overview of our first-half performance relative to our revised 2026 guidance. I will elaborate on the key drivers behind our guidance revision in the following slides. The net refining margin was $21.4 per barrel in the second quarter, bringing the first-half net refining margin to $15.6 per barrel. Our half-year capacity utilization rate was 95.1%, in line with our guidance. Production and sales reached 13.6 million tons and 15.3 million tons respectively. We spent close to $250 million on plant investments over the first half. The next slide is showing our refinery maintenance schedule. The schedule remains unchanged from last quarter. All activities scheduled for 2026 consist of routine periodic maintenance. Execution remains on track with no major plant maintenance projects this year, supporting high capacity utilization and underpinning our full-year production guidance. Turning to our revised 2026 guidance, we are raising our net refining margin expectation to $13-$15 per barrel from $6-$7 per barrel earlier. The wider range of guidance is set to capture the continued volatility in sector dynamics. The revised guidance is driven not only by the stronger refining environment experienced year to date, but also by our conviction that favorable market conditions will persist alongside our ability to continue capturing value through effective execution. Global refinery outages have significantly tightened product markets, these supply disruptions will take time to unwind. Even if geopolitical tensions ease, we expect only a gradual normalization in product markets, which should continue to underpin crack margins. On the crude side, our flexible sourcing capability has enabled us to effectively manage feedstock costs, further supporting our refining performance. Looking ahead, we anticipate a strong third quarter supported by prevailing strength in crack margins and peak seasonal demand. At the same time, our guidance assumes a gradual normalization of product market conditions from August onwards, while crude premiums are expected to increase from September relative to August levels. We also factor in the typical seasonal moderation in demand in the fourth quarter. Our guidance for production, sales, and investment CapEx remains unchanged. This concludes our presentation, now we will proceed to the Q&A session. The first question is from the line of Ricardo Rezende with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hello. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. If I may, three short questions. The first one on the updated guidance. Is the higher margins also due to your expectations of a higher share of white products within your mix, similar to what I've seen in the second quarter? The second question, when you mention about the maintenance schedule, if margins remain higher for longer, would you consider pushing some of those maintenance to 2027, or you rather take the chance on going into maintenance in the low season? The third question is on your crude strategy. If you could just comment a little bit on the different crudes that you bought during the second quarter, and if you see any relevant changes compared to your historical crude intake. Thank you. Thank you, Ricardo, for the questions. Let me start with our net refining margin guidance. As you followed through the presentation, we delivered a very strong second quarter supported by a favorably refining environment and crack margins that remained significantly above last year's level. First of all, looking ahead, we expect that disrupted refining capacity, especially in the Middle East and Russia, will return gradually in 2026, probably until early 2027. This should definitely continue to provide support for margins. Although we expect some normalization from these exceptionally strong levels seen recently, because as you follow, around 10% of the total global refining capacity is within the Gulf region, and it corresponds to around 12 million barrels per day. On the other hand, Russia also has an important impact on the refining capacity. Around seven million barrels of their refining capacity is there, and almost one-third of this capacity was hit by the drone attacks. Compared to the beginning of the year, Russia's refinery runs declined by around two million barrels per day. This is a very significant amount. All in all, we think that crack margins will continue to be strong in the third and especially fourth quarter of the year with a normalization from the exceptionally strong levels that we see right now. As for the white product yield, we reached 83% in the first six months of the year. We think that this will continue in the upcoming periods. We don't expect any material change in our white product yield for the remaining part of the year, as long as we continue to achieve these high capacity utilization rates. This is critical for us. On your last question regarding the crude strategy, as you know, we are running one of the most complex refineries within the Mediterranean region. The fact that our refinery is complex gives us the flexibility to source from various suppliers. This year, we procured from around 14 countries with around 24 different grades. This is important. We started to process a few new crude types in our refineries this year as well. On top of it, we have two coastal refineries. This also gives us logistical advantage for crude imports as well as product exports. Last but not least is the trading office that we have. It also gives us the optionality to tap into new markets as we did in this volatile period. We procured two cargos from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve of the U.S. as well as tapped into new countries, as we discussed in our last call, like Guyana, Colombia, Norway. Trying to diversify our supply base as much as we can given this volatile environment, and use this operational flexibility as a key asset for our refining performance. Regarding the maintenance schedule, as we discussed during the presentation, we don't expect any postponement or delay, and we continue to stick to our maintenance schedule that we announced at the beginning of the year. Thank you. Okay. The next question is from the line of Anna Kishmariya with UBS. Please go ahead. Good day. Thank you for the presentation. Congratulations on very strong results. A couple of questions from my side. Probably first around the net refining margin for the quarter. Can you please provide a little bit more color around what impact from the jet fuel lag was there, and the differential? I think previously we were discussing that the differentials were expanding, but it looks like you managed to realize a very good differential, very good price for your crude basket, and also what was the impact from the jet margin lag. Second question will be around the effective tax rate. What should we think of it going forward for this second half of the year? Because there was this one-off of the reevaluation of the deferred taxes, but what would be the reasonable assumption for the second half of the year? Final question around working capital unblind. You mentioned that it will be gradually unblinding. Do you mean it will be gradually unblinding over 2026, or so we will see some working capital built in the second half, or whether it will take longer and it will take into 2027 to fully unblind this? Thank you. Can the management hear us? Sorry, can you hear us? We can hear you now, yes. Okay. I apologize. I think we were on mute. We were just talking and just trying to respond to the queries of Anne. Starting with the first question on the jet margins, as we discussed during the first quarter conference call, there is a certain lag in our jet fuel margins due to the contractual structure of the jet fuel sales that we make in Turkey. Therefore, the positive impact of the spike in jet cracks, which occurred in March, was marginally reflected in the first quarter, but was fully realized in the second quarter. We have seen the spike in jet margins that was realized in March, in the second quarter mostly. This was beneficial from the second quarter's financial perspective. On your second question regarding the differentials. As you follow up, the easing of the geopolitical tensions in late June has supported a more favorable crude procurement outlook for the third quarter. We have seen the peaks in May and June for the crude differentials, as you can see on the presentation. With the easing of these geopolitical tensions and the start of the ceasefire talks, we have seen a much more favorable crude procurement outlook for the third quarter. This renewed volatility, both in Hormuz as well as in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, we think that could put some upward pressure on costs later in the period, especially from September onwards. This is something that we expect, especially, as I said, for the differentials, because given the fact that the volatility still continues, especially in the Gulf as well as in Russia and Ukraine, we think that this could put some pressure on costs later in the third quarter, especially from September onwards. All in all, we have seen the peaks in May and June. The differential started to ease from July onwards, especially July and August, we think that there could be some pressure from September onwards, as discussed. I think your last question was on the effective tax rate. The impact on the deferred tax was reflected in the second quarter results because of the fact that this tax rate changed from 25% to 11.5%, declined the deferred tax liability of Tüpraş on the balance sheet. This was reflected, as I said, in the second quarter result as a one-off tax income. We'll be seeing the cash impact of this tax legislation change in 2026. As I said, this is a one-off deferred tax income and will not be having an impact on the second half results of Tüpraş. Thank you very much. Oh, one more from Your last question was on the working capital. Typically, our target working capital is to have a neutral working capital balance by having around 20 to 25 days of receivable turnover, amount of inventory turnover, and 50 to 55 days of a trade payables turnover. The fact that we procured more spot cargoes with better terms in the first half of the year, helped us to have negative net working capital because of the increase in our trade payables days. We think that this will gradually normalize within this year, and our target of neutral net working capital will continue. A few days, we could have an impact on the net working capital days for a couple of days, let's say, for normalization purposes. You can think of an adjustment of a couple of days to normalize our net working capital. As I said, these levels are unusual for us because of the fact that our spot crude purchases increased during this period with more favorable payment terms. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Ildar Khaziev with HSBC. Please go ahead. Yes, hello. Thank you so much, and congratulations with the very strong results. Just a question on the cash flow statement. I am seeing that there was a net 42 billion TRY outflow from derivatives. Is my understanding correct that this is basically as a settlement of the loss you might have in 1Q? Should we expect that this will reverse a bit in 3Q, given that you now have a positive net derivative position on the balance sheet? Thank you. In terms of the derivative position, this mainly comes from our inventory hedging activity. As an inventory hedging strategy, what we try to do is we're aiming to align the pricing period of crude processed in our refineries with the pricing out period of the products sold in the market. As a result of this hedging policy, we carry very limited flat price exposure for our inventories, which corresponds to bottom or deep inventory levels. Accordingly, inventory gain and loss stemming from the balance sheet is very much limited, as you can see in our profit before tax reconciliation. This means that any cash inflow and outflow coming from the hedging activity offsets with the inventory gains and losses stemming from the balance sheet. The cash flow impact is somehow offset between the derivatives and the change in inventories. Thank you so much. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Can Alagöz with QNB Finansinvest. Please go ahead. Mr. Alagöz, can you speak? Can you hear me now? Yes, we can hear you. You can go ahead. Okay, great. Sorry about it. Thank you. Thanks for the call. My question is about your cash position and the dividend outlook. Your cash position is very strong and credit spreads suggest strong third quarter with healthy operating cash flow again. Given this, is there any possibility of additional dividend payment for this year on top of the dividend already announced? Because if I remember correctly, the company made additional dividend distribution in 2023 or 2024. Should we consider a similar scenario as a possibility for this year? Thank you. Thank you for the question. We don't have any specific practice of paying additional or special dividends in a financial year. Our dividend decisions are assessed annually, taking into account our annual financial performance, future CapEx plans, cash flow budget for the upcoming year, and our liquidity requirements, obviously. At this stage, it's still early to comment on a potential dividend based on solely half-year results. As you also pointed out, the outlook is obviously supportive because of the strong earnings momentum we are seeing right now. We also have a publicly disclosed dividend policy whereby we target to distribute around 80% of our distributable profit calculated in accordance with the Capital Markets Board requirements. We remain committed to this policy as well, and any dividend proposal is made by the board of directors for the relevant financial year and obviously remains subject to the approval of the general assembly. What we try to achieve is that after distributing dividends, we always want to make sure that our balance sheet is healthy and our liquidity position is intact. As I said, there's no practice of paying additional dividends or special dividends in a financial year. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much. The next question is from the line of Sacha Lenka with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Yes. Thank you very much for the presentation and the opportunity to ask questions. I just have one question, with regards to the refining macro outlook. I think you did mention that the Gulf region is about 10% of global refining capacity. Just wanted your views on, if things normalize and the Strait of Hormuz reopens, what percentage of that capacity in your view would return? The reason I ask is when we saw the MoU signed in mid-June, and things started to normalize, you did see a pretty sharp correction in refining margins generally speaking, and obviously given all of the volatility in July, they did go up. Just wanted your views there. Thank you. Thank you for the question. First of all, the exceptionally high margins we saw in March were largely driven by a temporary supply shock and a degree of market panic as you might remember. In the second quarter, European refiners shifted yields toward Middle East slates to compensate the imports coming from the Middle East, especially Europe is dependent on Middle East slate products to the Gulf region, Middle Eastern supply. This had led some moderation from recent peaks in Middle East slate cracks. The margins still continue to remain well above their five-year average levels. At the same time, because the European refiners shifted their production to Middle East slate, the gasoline balances started to tighten, and the fact that the peak season, the driving season kicked in, we have seen an increase in gasoline margins as well. All in all, both Middle East slate margins as well as gasoline margins increased in the second quarter of the year and supported the overall refining margin environment. More recently, Russia imposed an export ban for both Middle East slate and gasoline products. This also resulted in tightened balances within Europe, including Türkiye, and again, supported the refining margin environment. On top of it, as discussed during the presentation, around 10% of the refining capacity is within the Gulf, and we know that approximately half of this was damaged as a kind of an infrastructure that damaged during the war. Russia also has a significant refining capacity of around 7 million barrels per day. Again, because of the Ukrainian drone attacks, Russian refinery outages are quite high compared to the beginning of the year. The refining capacity in Russia declined by around 2 million barrels per day. This is also putting pressure on the product balances within Europe and Med. We think that the recovery of those damages will take time and because of this, we'll be seeing still high crack margin environments in 2026. This is creating obviously a beneficial environment for all refiners operating in Europe as well as in the U.S. These are the key assumptions that are relevant for our net refining margin. Anything that you'd like to add, Melda? Let me add one thing there. What we've seen recently is an exceptional level in crack margins in July. Obviously, those seem to be unsustainable, so we do not expect those levels to be within our numbers in the remainder of the year. Even at the times when the news flow was a little bit more optimistic or positive when Hormuz was open, we've seen crack margins very strong within the second quarter. What we are assuming is, yes, some gradual normalization because of the reasons Gökhan was explaining, but still very strong crack margins in the third quarter, if not for the full year. We would not even rule out a case scenario where the strong crack margins run into early 2027. Yeah. Thank you. That's very clear. Thank you. We have a follow-up question from Ildar Khaziev with HSBC. Please go ahead. Thank you again. I wanted to ask about your fleet of tankers. You've been building that fleet for quite some time, and I think I've seen news about another order for four more tankers recently. Can you tell us what's the target there in the midterm? What kind of fleet size do you have in mind, and is the fact that you have such a fleet, is that the reason why your freight costs have not really increased at all if I look at your financials? Also, if you could comment on how much of your needs your own fleet covers at the moment, and actually at what point the delivery takes place. Is it like FOB Turkey coast, so this is like FOB somewhere, in other locations where you're actually purchasing the crude oil. How should we look at the freight? Is it really reflected in your P&L statement? Thank you. Let me start. Thank you for the question. As you follow from our announcements, we placed order for four Suezmax ships a couple of days ago and signed a construction contract with two Korean shipbuilders. As you know, we have been active in this business for an extended period, and the primary objective of this investment is to expand our fleet and strengthen the security and flexibility of our crude oil supply chain. That's very critical for us because we are short in fleet. We need to import crude to the country in order to run our refineries. We are short in transportation and time charter. This is one of the costs that we incur in order to bring products to the country. We think that investing in vessels will support Tüpraş's core refining operations by increasing our transportation flexibility and enhancing supply security as well as operational efficiency. These are the reasons that we think will be key for investing in those four ships. What I can tell you in addition to this is that with these four Suezmax ships, our total shipping capacity is expected to increase by around 75% to around 1.5 million deadweight tons. We'll be spending around $400 million for the procurement of those ships. As mentioned, we just placed the orders right now, and the delivery will take place in 2029. Hence, the payments will be made in installments, so there'll be not any one-off cash flow impact on our balance sheet in 2026 or 2027. We'll be making the payments in installments until 2029. The CapEx impact will also be limited for this year. Anything that you would like to add, Gülsen, from shipping side? No, I think it's all complete. I think part of the question was how much self-sufficient we are. I wouldn't look at it like that, but I can tell you that the amount of our cargoes going through our subsidiary, Ditaş, is around small piece. That doesn't mean that the entire capacity is allocated to us, so that would not necessarily answer the question. I would more focus on the capacity increase that Gökhan was mentioning, which is about 75%. Exactly. This is crucial because, as I mentioned, we are short in the fleet. We need to bring product to the country to process in our refineries. The more we buy on an FOB basis directly from the source, the more we benefit by capturing more value within the supply chain. Otherwise, if there are some arbitrage opportunities between regions, in most of the time, the ship owners will be the ones who fill this gap and capture more from the arbitrage opportunities. By owning those ships, we'll be in a position to capture more value within the supply chain by going directly to the source and making our crude procurements as much FOB-based as possible. Thank you so much for the explanation. Can I just ask whether for the cargoes for which you can't use your own fleet, for those cargoes, the cost of freight will be a part of the cost of crude purchases, right? Right. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the conference over to management for any closing comments. Thank you. Thank you once again for joining us today. Before we conclude, I'd like to share a few closing remarks. The second quarter unfolded against a dynamic geopolitical backdrop and continued volatility across global energy markets. As the quarter progressed, the market narrative shifted from crude availability towards refined product availability. Lower global refining utilization, together with ongoing refinery outages, resulted in tighter product balances and created a supportive environment for refining margins that extended well beyond the initial geopolitical disruptions. Against this backdrop, we delivered robust operational and financial performance, high utilization across our refining system, disciplined execution, and operational flexibility once again enabled us to capture favorable market conditions. The first half of the year has validated the strength of our execution capabilities. Our decision to raise full-year net refining margin guidance to $13 to $15 per barrel reflects not only improved market conditions, but also our confidence in our ability to consistently turn market opportunities into sustainable financial performance. Although our guidance incorporates a gradual normalization in product markets during the second half, we believe our integrated business model, operational excellence, and financial discipline position us well to successfully navigate through evolving market dynamics and deliver long-term value for our shareholders. We appreciate your continuing trust, support, and we look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Thank you. Bye-bye.