Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the first quarter 2021 Arbor Realty Trust earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. Also, be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your speaker today, Paul Elenio, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead. Okay. Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to the quarterly earnings call for Arbor Realty Trust. This morning we'll discuss the results for the quarter ended March 31st, 2021. With me on the call today is Ivan Kaufman, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Before we begin, I need to inform you that statements made in this earnings call may be deemed forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including information about possible or soon future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, and objectives. These statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance, taking into account the information currently available to us. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Arbor's expectations in these forward-looking statements are detailed in our SEC reports. Listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of today. Arbor undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after today or the occurrences of unanticipated events. I'll now turn the call over to Arbor's President and CEO, Ivan Kaufman. Thank you, Paul, and thanks to everyone for joining us on today's call. We're very excited today to discuss our outstanding first-quarter results and the significant success we've had in continuing to build on the tremendous momentum we created in 2020. As we mentioned on our last call, we have been the top-performing REIT in the space for almost five years in a row, and we were extremely confident that we would be able to continue that success in 2021. Our exceptional first-quarter results continue to demonstrate our unique ability to consistently deliver outsized returns in every market cycle through our diverse operating platform. One of our primary goals for 2021 was to join the dividend elite club of 10 straight years of dividend growth. We are very pleased to have accomplished that goal by increasing our dividend to $0.34 a share this quarter. This is our fourth consecutive quarterly dividend increase and our 20th increase in the last 10 years, all while continuing to maintain the lowest dividend payout ratio in the industry. We've built a viable operating platform focusing on the right asset classes with very stable liability structures, an active balance sheet, GSE agency business, private label program, and single-family rental platform, and many diversified income streams that generate strong earnings and dividends in every market cycle. I can't stress enough the importance of having multiple products with diverse income streams, and that is why we believe we should consistently trade at a substantial premium to our peer group. To further highlight our incredible success, I would like to talk about the significant growth we experienced in the first quarter in all areas of our business and how well-positioned we are to continue this success going forward. As Paul will discuss in more detail, our first quarter financial results were once again very remarkable. We produced distributable earnings of $0.52 per share, which is an incredible accomplishment and well in excess of our current dividend, representing a payout ratio of just around 65%. Our ability to consistently generate exceptional results and increase our dividend is a true testament to the value of our franchise and the many diversified income streams we have created. We continue to realize significant benefits from many areas of our diverse platform, including continued growth in our GSE agency platform that produces strong margins and increased servicing fees, strong contributions from our private label program, record growth, and significant benefits from the size and scale of our balance sheet business, as well as superior execution in our liability structures, strong performance of our multifamily-focused portfolios with very few delinquencies and extremely low forbearances, and substantial income from our residential business. These reoccurring benefits, combined with our versatile originations platform, strong pipeline, and credit quality of our portfolio, puts us in a unique position to be able to continue to produce significant distributable earnings going forward as we are extremely well positioned for future growth and success. A little over a year ago, we made a commitment to build out a premier single-family rental platform. We believe the single-family rental space is as big as the multifamily lending market and is a phenomenal business with enormous opportunities in the bridge, permanent lending, and build to rent products. We made considerable progress in growing out this platform and are committed to being a leader in this space. We are very pleased with the significant growth we are seeing in our pipeline of opportunities by leveraging off of our existing originations capacity and capabilities. In the first quarter, we closed $162 million of single-family rental product and currently have well over a billion dollars of additional deals in our pipeline, making us very optimistic about the growth in this segment of our business. We also believe we are the leader in the single-family build to rent space, which provides us with opportunities to originate construction, bridge, and permanent loans on the same transactions. Again, we are very excited about the growth in this platform and are confident this business will be a significant driver of yet another income stream, further diversifying our lending platform. We also continue to experience significant growth in our GSE agency platform and are seeing increased momentum in our private label product as well. We originated $1.25 billion in agency loans in the first quarter and $1.4 billion, including our private label business, which is up from $800 million in agency originations and $1.1 billion, including private label, for the first quarter of last year. Equally as important, we have a very robust pipeline giving us confidence in our ability to produce significant agency volumes for the balance of the year. Our GSE agency platform continues to offer a premium value as it requires limited capital and generates significant long-dated predictable income streams and produces significant annual cash flow. Additionally, our $25.5 billion GSE agency servicing portfolio, which has grown 26% in the last year, is mostly prepayment-protected and generates $117 million a year and growing in recurring cash flow, which is up 33% from $88 million annually last year. This is in addition to the strong gain on sale margins we continue to generate from our origination platform, which combined with new and increased servicing revenues, will continue to contribute greatly to our earnings and dividends. We're seeing tremendous growth in our balance sheet business as our deal flow has greatly exceeded our expectations. We have already grown our balance sheet loan book 14% in the first quarter to $6.3 billion on $1 billion in new originations. We have a very robust pipeline which will allow us to meaningfully grow our loan book for the balance of the year. This unprecedented growth will significantly increase our run rate of net interest income going forward. Very importantly, these balance sheet loans also create a substantial pipeline of future GSE agency origination volumes and long-dated servicing revenues, further increasing our future earnings and dividends. Additionally, we are very successful in raising $150 million of common equity in the first quarter and issuing $175 million of five year 5% unsecured debt last week, which will allow us to fund our growing pipeline of loans and investments to be extremely accretive to our future earnings and dividends. In fact, once this capital is fully deployed, we estimate it will be $0.06-$0.08 accretive to annual earnings rate. For every $100 million of capital we raise in the future at these prices, we estimate we will grow our annual earnings and dividend by an additional $0.02-$0.03 a share. Another area of emphasis and one of key business strategies is the financing of a high-quality balance sheet portfolio with the appropriate liability structures. We have consistently been the leader in the CLO securitization market, we were once again very successful in closing our 14th CLO in the first quarter, totaling $785 million with very favorable terms, including higher leverage, reduced pricing, enhanced flexibility, and a two-and-a-half year replenishment feature. The continued utilization of these vehicles has contributed greatly to our success by allowing us to appropriately match fund our assets with non-recourse, non-mark-to-market, long-term dated, and generate very attractive levered returns on our capital and provide us with a rock-solid balance sheet. It is also very important to stress that over 90% of our book are senior bridge loans. More importantly, 83% of our portfolio is in multifamily assets, which has been the most resilient asset class in all cycles and continues to significantly outperform all other asset classes in this cycle as well. In summary, we had an exceptional quarter and we are well positioned to have another outstanding year in 2021. We have a versatile operating platform that is multifamily centric with a strong pipeline, significant servicing income, sizable balance sheet portfolio, single-family and rental platform, and residential mortgage business, providing us with many diverse and growing business lines that positions us exceptionally well for continued future success. As a result, we are confident that we will continue to outperform our peers and preserve our long-term streak of being the best-performing company in our space. I will now turn this call over to Paul to take you through the financial results. Okay, thanks, Ivan. As Ivan mentioned, we had another exceptional quarter producing distributable earnings of $75 million or $0.52 per share for the first quarter. These results once again translated into industry-high ROEs of approximately 20% for the first quarter, which was up 50% from the first quarter last year and have allowed us to increase our dividend run rate to $1.36 a share. Our financial results continue to benefit greatly from many aspects of our diverse business model, including significant growth in our agency and balance sheet business platforms that produce substantial gain on sales margins, long-dated servicing income, and strong levered returns on our capital, the substantial income we continue to generate from our residential banking joint venture, and the credit quality of our portfolio. As we mentioned earlier, we had another phenomenal quarter from our residential banking business. Recorded approximately $22 million of income from this investment in the first quarter, which contributed approximately $0.13 a share on a tax-affected basis to our distributable earnings. The income from this investment was higher than we expected in the first quarter, mainly due to entering into an agreement with one of our key principals to purchase a portion of our future ownership interest at a premium. Which accounted for approximately $11 million of additional income allocated to us in the first quarter. As a result of this transaction, we will receive approximately 9% of all income from this business on a go-forward basis. The income from this investment continues to emphasize the diversity of our income streams and acts as a natural hedge against declining interest rates, specifically earnings on our escrow balances. While this investment will continue to contribute to our distributable earnings going forward, as expected, we are seeing some normalization in volumes and margins in the business, which started in March, we believe this trend could continue for the balance of the year. Our adjusted book value of March 31st was approximately $10.86 a share, adding back roughly $62 million of non-cash general CECL reserves on a tax-affected basis. This is up 5% from approximately $10.35 a share last quarter, largely due to our first quarter capital raise, as well as the significant earnings we generated in the first quarter that were well in excess of our dividend. As a reminder, we have very little exposure to the asset classes that have been affected the most by the recession, such as retail and hospitality. Our total exposure to these asset classes is approximately $200 million or 4% of our portfolio. We also believe we have adequately reserved for these assets and do not feel at this point that any material further impairment will be necessary, which gives us confidence that our adjusted book value accurately reflects the current impact of the recession. Looking at the results from our GSE agency business, we originated $1.25 billion in loans and recorded $1.8 billion in loan sales in the first quarter. The margins on our GSE agency loan sales was up to approximately 1.47% in the first quarter from 1.41% in the fourth quarter. In the first quarter, we recorded $37 million of mortgage servicing rights income related to $1.5 billion of committed loans, representing an average MSR rate of around 2.53% compared to 2.45% last quarter. As Ivan mentioned, we've also seen an uptick in our private label business, originating $150 million in new product in the first quarter. Our servicing portfolio also grew another 3% this quarter to $25.5 billion at March 31st, with a weighted average servicing fee of 46 basis points and an estimated remaining life of nine years. This portfolio will continue to generate a predictable annuity of income going forward of around $117 million gross annually, which is up approximately $29 million or 33% on an annual basis from the same time last year. Additionally, prepayment fees related to certain loans that have yield maintenance provisions was approximately $2.7 million for both the first quarter and fourth quarters. We also continue to see very positive trends related to our GSE agency business collections, which we believe reflects the strength of our borrowers and the quality of our GSE agency portfolio. We only have a handful of delinquent loans outstanding and extremely low forbearance numbers in our portfolio through March. Loans in forbearance represent less than 0.4% of our $19.1 billion Fannie book and around 5.25% of our $4.8 billion Freddie loan book, which is actually down slightly since January, as we've had very few new requests for forbearances in the last several months. As a result of these extremely low forbearance numbers, we also have no material unrecovered servicing advances outstanding. In our balance sheet lending operation, we had substantial growth, growing our portfolio 14% to $6.3 billion in the first quarter on over $1 billion of new originations. Our $6.3 billion investment portfolio had an all-in yield of 5.64% at March 31st, compared to 5.8% at December 31st, mainly due to higher rates on runoff as compared to new originations during the quarter. The average balance in our core investments was up to $5.9 billion this quarter from $5.1 billion last quarter, mainly due to the significant growth we experienced in both the fourth and first quarters. The average yield on these investments was 5.72% for the first quarter, compared to 6.04% for the fourth quarter, mainly due to more acceleration of fees from early runoff in the fourth quarter and higher interest rates on runoff as compared to originations in the first quarter. Total debt on our core assets was approximately $5.6 billion at March 31st with an all-in debt cost of approximately 2.9% compared to a debt cost of around 3.03% at December 31st. The average balance on our debt facilities was up to approximately $5.2 billion for the first quarter from $4.6 billion for the fourth quarter, again, mostly due to financing the growth in our portfolio. The average cost of funds on our debt facilities decreased to 2.99% for the first quarter from 3.05% for the fourth quarter. Overall net interest spreads on our core assets decreased to 273 this quarter, compared to 2.99% last quarter, again, mainly due to yield compression on new originations as compared to runoff and less acceleration of fees from early runoff this quarter. Our overall spot net interest spreads were relatively flat at 2.74% at March 31st and 2.77% at December 31st. Lastly, the average leverage ratio on our core lending assets, including the trust preferreds and perpetual preferred stock as equity, was down to 83% in the first quarter from 85% in the fourth quarter. Our overall debt-to-equity ratio on a spot basis was flat at 3.0 -1 for both March 31st and December 31st, excluding general CECL reserves. That completes our prepared remarks for this morning, and I'll now turn it back to the operator to take any questions you may have at this time. Chris? Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press the star and one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press the pound key. We do ask that you please pick up your handset to allow for optimal sound quality. Our first question comes from Steven Delaney from JMP Securities. Please go ahead. Good morning, Ivan Kaufman and Paul Elenio, and congrats on a strong report overall, and especially the latest dividend hike to $0.34. I looked back in our model this morning and from our records, and I think they're accurate, you've now doubled your dividend since the $0.17 paid in the fourth quarter of 2016, so just a bit over four years, so quite an accomplishment. As far as Q&A, Ivan Kaufman, I could tell the enthusiasm in your SFR and B2R initiative. Could you just give us an update on that program in terms of I understand it's carried in the structured business currently, but how large are the outstanding loans on the books at March 31? How do the returns on these compare to your traditional bridge loan product? Thank you. Sure. We think the build-to-rent space is a phenomenal space, and I'm intent on dominating that space and personally active in relationship building. What we like about the business is it has three components. The first one is the construction element, which is a little bit more complicated, requires a balance sheet and real entrepreneurial capability. That's the initial phase. We're generally pricing those loans to levered returns of low to mid-teens. That's just the beginning of the story. The real benefit is transitioning them to a bridge loan in a look very much like a multi-family loan and give us the same kind of returns. Then we exit those through our private label program or sometimes through the agencies. We get what we call three bites at the apple with each product. Sure It creates long-dated revenue streams. The other aspects are just doing scattered sites, floating rate loans or fixed rate loans. That's a little bit more of a competitive market. We're fairly active in that as well. Relative to what's on the balance sheet and what's in the pipeline, Paul, I'm going to transition that to you on what we've done year to date. Yeah. Sure. Thanks. Thanks, Steven Delaney, for the compliments. I think what we've accomplished has been extraordinary as well. As far as where the numbers land on the balance sheet and kind of the different pieces as Ivan Kaufman laid out, we've got several pieces of this business. We have a permanent side of the business, as you know. Some of that is fixed-rate loans, which we did have a little bit of a sale this quarter on some inventory we had on our balance sheet. That will go through the agency business because it's being sold kind of into the market as individual sales, and we'll carry that through our agency business. It hasn't been big yet, but that's where that'll go. The rest of the business, the permanent variable rate loans that we're swapping out and pooling for a securitization, kind of like a CLO or a private label securitization, that'll end up on the structured side of the business and has. You've got the build to rent and the bridge loans. All that being said, where we're at is we have about $190 million sitting in our balance sheet business, which is comprised of bridge, funded build to rent, and permanent execution that's variable rate. Keep in mind, though, we've done about $350 million of build to rent deals, and only about $40 million of that has been funded. There's about $300 million that's unfunded that we've committed to and we disclose in our filings. As we fund those advances, it'll continue to add to the balance sheet portfolio on the structured side. Got it. We saw an increase in private label, $152 million in the quarter, or at least that's what, in terms of originations. Now, are some of those single-family rental fixed-rate loans? No. They're not. Those are just fixed-rate loans. That's a good lead in because what you'll see, and this is one of the benefits of the way we run our company is, as you're fully aware from some of the other people you cover, agency originations were quite soft in the first quarter. Yes. We look at it a little bit holistically. It's just a matter of where we're going to originate, whether it be agency, whether it be private label, whether it be bridge. Depending on the appetite of the agencies, we may do more private label or more bridge. That's what makes our franchise so unique in the sense that it's just a matter of which pocket the originations go into. Overall, we look at the overall, not the particular segment. Understood. Steve, just to give some numbers to that, the overall for the quarter between the agency, private label, and balance sheet, we did 2.5 billion of transactions this quarter. If you go back to this time last year in the first quarter, which was largely pre-pandemic, if you remember. Sure We did about $2 billion. We're up 28% over last year's numbers. Nice. Which were pre-pandemic. This growth has been pretty exceptional. One final thing, Ivan. It's early in the year, but we are working with lower caps on the GSEs, on multifamily. Kind of awkward, I call $70 billion lower than $80 billion. You know what I'm talking about. Fannie Mae totally blew through in the first quarter, $21.5 billion versus $17.5 billion, so $4 billion over. I'm thinking as we get into the second half of the year, these seem pretty firm when Mark Calabria put these in place, that he wanted them down and he wanted more affordable. Is this going to play into I know the private label that you did was not necessarily focused on this, but could we see, by the second half of this year, another opportunity for you to aggregate private label multifamily and do a second CMBS transaction? Without a question. While the first quarter was strong, it was really as a result of a strong January. The agencies backed off, and February and March were actually much lighter than anticipated, and that's when we started gaining a lot of momentum on our private label. We've gained considerable momentum, and I think it'll be an active part of our business for all of 2021. Also, we don't see that backing off. We see the agencies having cap issues. We see a greater level of affordability, which you know we play in very big. We think our private label is going to be a great part of our story. Thank you both for the comments. Thanks, Steve. Our next question comes from Leon Cooperman from Omega Family Office. Your line is open. Thank you. I hesitate to add any compliments to supplement the prior questioner, but let me just say, I've been involved with the company, actually since the IPO, and very heavily for the last decade. I have to compliment you on the movement into multiple product lines, the CLOs that you managed to issue. I think you've been very masterful in running the company. What should I worry about? What worries you at night? What keeps you up? Clearly, when you're growing a business, there's always a lot to worry about. I want to reflect on one thing, that we're one of the only companies in our space that didn't suffer any dilution going through the financial dislocation that just occurred. You actually bought some stock back at the near the low. We did. Most people were getting rescue capital. We would keep an eye on our liquidity. We would keep an eye on our liability structures. Those are critical because we always go through a downturn, and as long as you have the right liability structures in place and good credit quality, you'll manage through those dislocations. We want to have as much liquidity as possible. Looking back on it, Lee, I guess, not having had to issue equity, I would've loved to have bought back more stock. For us, we focus on our liability structures, and we focus on our liquidity, and most significantly, we will focus on our ability to manage our portfolio, which is outstanding. Those are the things that we focus on so we don't lose too much sleep. Well, congratulations on your performance. Stay well. I lose sleep because of my prostate, not because of Arbor Realty. Thanks, Lee. Lee. Take care. Stay healthy. Our next question comes from Charlie Arestia from JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, Ivan and Paul. Thanks for taking the questions today. We've heard a lot recently about there being a lot of capital chasing after multifamily and industrial properties lately, sort of a flight to quality post-COVID, broader unknowns around office and hospitality, and more of the known issues with retail. Obviously, multifamily is most relevant to Arbor by a wide margin. Ivan, would love to get your view on what you're seeing out there in terms of competition for your core assets, if you're seeing that competition pick up recently as more of your peers have gotten more comfortable deploying capital than maybe a quarter or two ago. The competition is fierce. It's actually greater now than it was pre-pandemic. Even a lot of the people who got hurt are back and being very aggressive. There's no question there's a lot of compression on our pricing, but trying to make that up on the debt side. We do have a franchise, we do have a lot of momentum. We did bulk up in the fourth quarter and first quarter to kind of get ahead. We have good spreads in place. We'll work on our liability structures and keep an eye on credit. I think one of the other things we're going to focus on very, very precisely is that for the loans we do put on our balance sheet, we're going to try and turn them as much as we can into agency, and pick up the back-end fees and reduce our risk on some of the loans that are on our books. Make no mistake about it's an extraordinarily aggressive environment right now. Understood. Look, we're sitting here first week of May. Obviously, agency originations came back down to earth a little bit this quarter. Curious if you can give us a sense of where volumes might shake out for the year, given what the pipeline looks like, and you guys typically have pretty good visibility into that. I think we all realize that 2020 was certainly an unusual year, but wondering how 2021 volumes might compare to your pre-COVID annual numbers. As I mentioned a little earlier, the agencies, while they had a great January, they did back off their pricing, lost some market share. They're starting to get aggressive again. I think it's going to be a pretty good year. I'll let Paul comment a little bit on the numbers. We are seeing growth on our private label segment of our business, which when the agencies widen out a little bit, that segment will pick up. I think from a holistic basis, we'll probably do fairly consistently what we did last year. The mix may be a little different between private label and between the agency side. Paul, you want to fill in some of the numbers? Yeah, sure. Charlie Arestia, good question, and I'll give you some color. As Ivan said, the agencies were a little light in February, March, and even into April, but our pipeline has gotten really, really big. Just some context around that. With private label, we did about $365 million of agency and private label in April. We have over a $2 billion pipeline right now in agency and private label. It's starting to pick up again. Our balance sheet business has grown dramatically, as you've seen. In the month of April, we did another $450 million of balance sheet product. We did have about $350 million of runoff. There was a couple of deals that ran off a little larger. The growth was about $100 million. I guess the way we look at it is exactly the way Ivan's laid this out. We've got multiple pockets, multiple different products, and I think we will be higher than we were last year on total volume, but the mix will change, right? Because we'll have a little bit less maybe on the agency, a little bit more private label, and certainly more origination volume on the balance sheet side. That's the kind of way we look at it. Again, we have the ability to go in all different areas of our business lines. The unknown is runoff. As Ivan mentioned, we're laser-focused on recapturing as much of the runoff as we can. We've always been a firm that's prided ourselves on portfolio retention. On the balance sheet side, we've been doing mostly multi-family bridge loans of late. In the last two quarters, we've recaptured more than 50% of the runoff on the balance sheet side into agency and APL product. That's the way we manage the business. I think, as Ivan said, we'll probably come in right around where we were last year. The mix will just be a little different, and we're excited about it. Got it. Thank you both so much for the color. Our next question comes from Stephen Laws from Raymond James. Your line is open. Good morning. Yeah, previous people said congrats on another strong quarter. Feel like that's every quarter. It's a great run. You guys have done a lot of hard work. To follow up on the previous comments, Ivan, on the private label, as you see that mix shift, do you have enough track record in the private label side to know your margins and gain on sale there? If you see a decline in the Fannie business, which I think has some higher margins than the other, is that going to be offset, or how do we think about that changing on a weighted basis as the mix shifts? The first private label securitization is always the hardest. What we were really pleased about, it was well received. We were a little nervous because with the pandemic hitting and potential credit issues, we didn't want to have a misstep. We're very pleased to say that the portfolio performed perfectly and the market's really expecting us to come back to market. I think that our second execution is going to be even better than our first, which did very well. We think it'll do very well. Paul can comment more on the margin side of the business. We feel really comfortable that that's just another product in line with similar execution to how we have it on the agency side of the business. Yeah. Steven, I think that's right. It'll change a little bit depending on market. We'll aggregate, as Ivan said, for another securitization. Obviously, we're swapping out what we can to protect our spreads. I've always guided this business from a low of 101.35 to a high of 101.50 on the margin. I think that's where we've been coming in consistently. Could the private label business do a little better in some of our securitizations? Yes, I think it'll blend all to around there. If it surprises us on the upside, that's great. I don't think the move in mix from agency to private label will change our margins dramatically overall on a weighted basis. Great. That's helpful. Two questions just around the higher rate, the move in rates we've seen. First on the servicing side, how sensitive is that? How much duration is added? If rates moved up, would that extend the life of those cash flows even further, and how much so? Or is it less sensitive than what you might see on resi MSRs? Secondly, does it give you an opportunity to earn a higher return on your escrow balances? How's that invested? If so, how much incremental return can you generate there? Yeah. Ivan, I don't know if you want me to take that. Go ahead, Paul. You take it. I think that's right. The MSRs that we generate is substantially different, as you know, Steven, to resi, because most of what we're doing is 10- 12- 15 year paper that has yield maintenance provisions and lockouts to about six months prior to maturity. This stuff is very sticky and that's what we love about this business. There are times people pay off early. You see we get prepayment fees. There may hold on the yield maintenance, I think it's less rate sensitive, as you said, than resi. That being said, if rates move and it makes sense for somebody to redo a deal, we'll be there to recapture that deal, and we'll also get in on the back end on the yield maintenance side. The second part of your question was? Escrow of return on your escrow. Related to escrow. Yeah. We're sitting with about $1.4 billion in escrow balances right now. Clearly they're earning far less than they were earning in the past, as you know, because of where rates have gone. We've had some natural hedges against that with the run-up in our resi business. Yeah, if rates move up substantially, we're going to see an increase in our escrow balances. That could be offset by the fact that we've got certain loans in our portfolio with LIBOR floors that may not fully kick in. Yeah, it's clearly on the escrow side, you could see a real run-up. I think we're earning about $5 million annually on our escrow balances right now. That number was $15 million, $16 million, $17 million when rates were higher a couple of years ago. There's obviously tremendous room for expansion there if rates were to rise. Yeah. Great. Well, that's helpful color. Thanks for the comments, Paul. Appreciate it. Our next question comes from Jade Rahmani with KBW. Your line is open. Good morning, everyone. This is Ryan Tomasello on for Jade. Just in terms of the SFR business, clearly there's a nice opportunity there. Was curious, Ivan, if you think that there will be an additional amount of investment required to build out that platform. I know you've already spent some capital in that space, but curious based on the outlook if you think you'd like to spend more there. As a follow-up to that, are there any interesting M&A opportunities to support the build-out of that SFR lending business? Thanks. On the build-out, it's actually a pretty good question because we were initially building it out at a totally separate and dedicated unit. We came to the conclusion that we could actually integrate it into our existing structure and have it aligned in part of our existing structure. When it comes to the build-to-rent unit, most of the operational structure and credit decisions are being made by the same bridge group. We're able to create enormous efficiencies and the same efficiencies on the origination side. It won't cost us as much. We actually adjusted that when we started. There won't be that much incremental overhead other than on an executive level, which we pretty much have our full complement of the executives that we need to create that. In terms of acquisition opportunities, I don't really see that many acquisition opportunities at the moment. We saw a few. We passed on them. We felt building them out better would be more interesting. I think it's more a commitment of our executive talent to create the relationships and the infrastructure, which we're very, very pleased with our growth. As Paul mentioned earlier, we have a pipeline of almost $1 billion that we think we can close over the next 12 months. That ramps up because a lot of the build to rent takes 24 months to deploy that money. Even with the $1 billion that we put out, it's going to take probably two years to get that money fully deployed. We're pretty pleased with all the elements that we have in place at the moment. Great. Thanks for that. Then Ivan, in terms of, or maybe for Paul rather, in terms of the residential mortgage JVs, just sifting through the puts and takes there with the volume normalization, coupled with the partial sell-down of your stake. What do you think is a meaningful baseline for our models over the next few quarters for that business just so that we're all on the same page here in terms of the reasonableness of expectations? This is the hardest thing we talk about every quarter, right? This business has surprised us on the upside every single quarter. As I mentioned in my commentary, we did have some excess income during the quarter from the sell-down of a piece of our interest. If you normalize that, it was probably $10 million, $11 million. There certainly has been some margin compression and some normalization of volumes as we all expected, and we saw it in the public companies as well that you guys all follow. April was probably one of our lower points at this point. We don't have it fully closed yet, but it's coming in obviously pretty light. I think for me, the way I look at this, and hopefully it'll surprise us on the upside, is that they're doing anywhere from a low of $40 million to a high of $70 million a quarter in profit, and our 9% represents anywhere from $4 million - $6 million of that. That's a normalized level for us. It's $0.02-$0.03 a share a quarter on a normalized level. I think that probably starts in the second quarter. Maybe it'll be a little higher, maybe it'll be a little lower, different quarters. It's a good business. We like it a lot. We're obviously very big on the consumer direct and retail side of that business. We're driven by technology greatly in that business, so we can gain market share. I think that's a pretty conservative number for us of $4 million - $6 million a quarter for our share, then hopefully it grows from there. Just one last question if I can. Just to give us an update around the seven NPLs that were unchanged quarter-over-quarter. Can you discuss the credit outlook there? Anything noticeable that has changed over the last few quarters? Maybe just a quick reminder on the major assets that comprise that pool. Thanks. Sure. We haven't really seen a change at all in our credit. In fact, our credit's held very, very strong. We've seen very few cracks, both on the agency side and on the balance sheet side. That number, it's quite impressive that that number has held in there. A couple of the deals that we've talked about in the past that are on that NPL list, is we've got a couple of student housing deals that we think will work out just fine and don't need reserves for. We've got one healthcare deal, and I think what's on there is also one multifamily deal. Again, we don't have a reserve on it, but we're working through that product right now. There's nothing really changed. It's a few assets, a couple of student housing, one multifamily, one healthcare deal. We don't have many in the way of reserves against those assets. Maybe on that $60 million in net carrying, we have about $6 million in reserves. We haven't seen the outlook materially change on those assets, and we're confident that we're adequately reserved. We're going to work out these assets and get some of them to perform and maybe even have a recovery down the road. That's our view. Thanks for taking the questions. With that, it appears there are no further questions over the line at this time. I'd like to go ahead and turn the program back over to Ivan for any closing remarks. Well, thanks everybody for your participation. It's been a great first quarter. We're really optimistic about the year and what we've put together in our operating franchise and multiple income streams. Look forward to the next quarter and everybody's participation. Everybody have a great day. This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.