Good morning, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Quarter 2022 Adaptimmune Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there'll be a question and answer session. To ask a question during this session, you'll need to press star one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Juli Miller, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Good morning, and welcome to Adaptimmune's conference call to discuss our first quarter 2022 financial results and business updates. I would ask you to review the full text of our forward-looking statements from this morning's press release. We anticipate making projections during this call, and actual results could differ materially due to several factors, including those outlined in our latest filings with the SEC. Adrian Rawcliffe, our Chief Executive Officer, and Gavin Wood, our Chief Financial Officer, are here with me for the prepared portion of the call. Other members of our management team will be available for Q&A. With that, I'll turn the call over to Adrian Rawcliffe. Thank you, Juli. Thank you everyone for joining us. Adaptimmune's ambition is to transform the lives of people with cancer by discovering, developing, and delivering cell therapies. This is clearly a long-term ambition, but in the short and medium term, we are focused on the delivery of our 2-2-5-2 strategy. This year, our focus is specifically on four clear areas. File the BLA for afami-cel, continue building our MAGE-A4 franchise, scale up our manufacturing capabilities and progress our allogeneic products towards the clinic. In the first quarter, we have executed well across all four areas. We are making good progress towards the submission of our BLA for our first product, afami-cel, for the treatment of synovial sarcoma. At ASCO next month, we will present pooled analysis from patients with synovial sarcoma from across our trials with afami-cel, with a full update on the SPEARHEAD-1 trial planned for CTOS later this year. Secondly, our MAGE-A4 franchise is expanding with the SURPASS family of clinical trials using our next generation SPEAR T-cells targeting MAGE-A4. We have continued to recruit steadily in the phase 1 SURPASS trial, and we are planning a data update at ESMO this year. As a reminder, this is a phase 1 trial that has shown responses across a broad range of solid tumors, and we aim to convert these early signals into registerable products. There have been two tumor types identified so far for further progression, esophageal and EGJ, as well as ovarian cancers. For esophageal and EGJ cancers, we are recruiting in our phase 2 SURPASS-2 trial. For ovarian cancer, we are planning to initiate an additional phase 2 trial, SURPASS-3, this year. We are also initiating a combination arm with nivolumab in the phase 1 SURPASS trial. Thirdly, as the only cell therapy company with late-stage autologous programs as well as advanced capabilities in the allo space, we are making progress towards filing an IND for our first wholly owned allogeneic product targeting MAGE-A4 next year, as well as progressing our collaborations with Genentech and with Astellas. Lastly, we are scaling U.S. manufacturing facilities to deliver cell therapies for our first commercial product and our ongoing and planned clinical trials. We are nearing the completion of construction for our new dedicated allogeneic manufacturing facility in the U.K., and we'll begin the commissioning process in Q3. We are constantly developing as a company, building the capabilities required to be an integrated cell therapy company. In our last call, I talked about the external additions to leadership in commercial and quality. Last week, we announced that Jo Brewer has been appointed to the role of Chief Scientific Officer, effective May 4. Jo is an exceptional scientific leader with a strong track record of building successful teams and driving innovation in cell therapy. She has a long history with Adaptimmune and its predecessor companies, with more than 20 years of experience, specifically in T-cell receptors, TCR-T cells, and cell therapies. She's worked on all of our clinical autologous programs, most recently has led our allogeneic efforts, building the allogeneic team from scratch, playing a key role in the partnerships with Astellas and with Genentech, and with her team, taking allogeneic stem cell-derived alpha beta T-cells from an idea towards clinical reality for us and our partners over the coming years. With that, I'd like to hand over to Gavin to provide a financial update. Gavin? Thanks, Adrian. With a robust balance sheet with total liquidity at the end of Q1 of $304 million, and I can confirm that this provides a cash runway that extends into early 2024, enabling us to execute against the focus areas Adrian has just laid out. We've invested significantly over the last few years to build an integrated cell therapy company with a full range of end-to-end capability. As we strongly believe that this is critical for the long-term success of Adaptimmune. Like you, we are acutely aware of the challenges presented by the biotech and wider financial markets. We have a seasoned management team who have weathered difficult markets in the past. We believe that fundamentally good companies with products that are close to commercialization and with a proven platform will be well-placed to achieve fair valuation as the markets rebalance. We have the people and the capabilities to position us well for long-term success to execute against our mission to transform the lives of people with cancer. With that financial update, I'll turn over the call to the operator for Q&A. Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you'll need to press star one on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. We have a question from Marc Frahm with Cowen and Company. Your line is open. Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe just to start off, getting to the next update from the ADP-A2M4CD8 program at ESMO. Can you provide some color as to kind of how many patients do you expect to be there, and do you expect more tumor types to kind of reach that go/no go decision that you've already gotten to with ovarian and esophageal? Short answer is... Hi, Marc Frahm. Thanks for the question. Short answer is no, we're not providing any guidance on the numbers of patients. We've said we recruited steadily in that phase I trial, and we'll update on all of the patients that we have assessments for at the time that we do the data cut for ESMO. I think the answer to your second question is a bit more nuanced. Obviously, the entire purpose of the phase I trial is to deliver signals in that. Clearly, as time goes by, we anticipate that we will identify additional indications for development. That that's the purpose of the trial, and that's all I'm gonna say on that. Okay. Thanks. That's helpful. Maybe on the BLA submission? Just on timelines there, I guess, have you had your pre-BLA meeting in? If not, you know, kind of what steps still need to be done before you can kind of request that and get that part of the process scheduled? We haven't had the pre-BLA meeting. What I would say is that the list of things that we have yet to do, we've outlined on the slide that's in our corporate deck. We've got a range of things that we've completed, including the preclinical sections of the filing, the pediatric plans, et cetera. Then on the right-hand side of that slide, which I'll refer you all to, it's got the items that are in progress, many of which relate to the CMC section of the file. I think progress is good on all of those aspects, and we remain on track for the filing this year. Okay. The last one, with ASGCT, you're presenting on a new next-generation MAGE-A4 product, with IL-7 and CCL19. Just can you explain the rationale on that product? You know, are there particular tumor types or tumor microenvironments that you know, you think that's particularly well suited for? I'm gonna ask Helen Tayton-Martin to take that. Helen. Yes. Thanks, Marc. Good question. Thank you. Yes. The next-gen construct you're referring to is a collaboration program construct from a program with Noile-Immune, where there are two additional molecules in the construct alongside the same TCR. One of them is IL-7, which is there to increase proliferation and survival of the T cells, and the other one is CCL19, which increases basically trafficking to the tumor site of not just the T cells, but broader immune cells as well. Two slightly different mechanisms to the CD8α, which is basically increasing potency of CD4 cells. In answer to your question, in regard to which tumor types, I think that we're taking a view that we're looking at both hot and cold tumors to see whether these two mechanisms together, you know, deliver the effect that we hope that they will. More to come on that as we get closer to opening the study. Okay. Thank you. Thanks, Marc Frahm. Our next question comes from Tony Butler with ROTH Capital. Your line is open. Yes. Good morning. Thanks very much. Two brief questions. One, I just wanna again refer Adrian to slide 12- Yeah. Really speak directly to the vector release from Miltenyi. I wanna understand if I'm correct, you're also building your own vector manufacturing, but you're gonna continue to use Miltenyi's vector if that's correct. What are the steps that would strike me as being a much more, let's say, heavy-weighted item that needs to be checked off. I'm just curious if you could speak to the nuances there. Second question is around SURPASS. To what end is there a desire perhaps to consider, or is there a consideration for a tumor-agnostic indication for MAGE-A4? Thanks very much. Okay. I'm going to ask John to answer the first question, which is, I'd just point out that Miltenyi Biotec is our supplier for vector for afami-cel, and for all other products, we make our own vector. John, do you wanna comment on the deliveries around the BLA? Yeah, sure. Thanks, Tony. This is John. Miltenyi is in their new commercial facility. They're not early days, actually. They're quite advanced in the commissioning of that facility. We expect by Q3 to have material from that facility that we'll use for our own drug product PPQs in Q3. You're also right on that we have our own facility as well for SURPASS and for future autologous products. We will use that for the viral vector. Thanks. With respect Thanks, John. To the opportunity for a tumor-agnostic indication arising out of the SURPASS trial, I'm going to ask Elliot Norry, Chief Medical Officer, to comment on that. Yeah. Hi. Thanks. I think that from the standpoint of a tumor-agnostic approach, it certainly makes sense. You know, our belief is that the basis for efficacy is the target, not the tumor type. That being said, in conversations with experts and regulatory advice, one needs to establish that the drug would generally be approvable in one or more tumor types initially, and then can approach a more tumor-agnostic approach. I think that we certainly have our eye on the ability to approach this from a tumor-agnostic standpoint, Tony, but we're also simultaneously looking at how do we demonstrate in each specific tumor type what would warrant an indication so that we can, you know, sort of move along those paths simultaneously. The trials that are designed to look individually at, you know, one tumor type and then another trial to look at another tumor type are not exclusive of a tumor-agnostic indication. They can be pursued simultaneously. Elliot, thanks very much. Appreciate it. Thanks, Tony. We have a question from Jonathan Chang with SVB Securities. Your line is open. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question. This is Yanan on for Jonathan Chang. Hi. I just wanted to ask on SURPASS-3, just what steps need to take place between now and trial initiation, and if there's, you know, just any other detail you can provide on that trial and the plan there. Elliot, do you want to take that? Sure. Hi, Uncertain. For the SURPASS-3 trial, it's really no different than what it takes to get other trials up and running. We have learned over time that it really is worth our while to get the protocol and the questions that we're specifically answering with the study really hammered out upfront. The steps that are ongoing really, not sort of remaining, but ongoing, are seeking KOL advice, finalizing protocol, getting ready to submit the protocol to regulatory authorities and study sites. We're on track to initiate that study this year. Great. Thank you for the additional detail there. Also just wanted to ask, as you're starting the checkpoint inhibitor combination for the CD8 strategy, just curious if there's certain indications that you think might be, you know, more warranted for a combination versus monotherapy approach? Yeah. The combination can be used with any of the indications in the SURPASS trial, so it's not being introduced for one or two specific indications. We actually think that the mechanism of action should be applicable to all of the tumor types, and it's really there to help the T cells. And we know that we bring both our own T cells and other T cells into the tumor based on translational studies, and that's across tumor types. If that's the case, then the checkpoint inhibitors really should have a chance of working across tumor types. You know, obviously, checkpoint inhibitors have had a range of efficacy in those tumor types. It's possible that it behaves differently from tumor type to tumor type, but we think that there's reason to pursue it in all of them. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Michael Schmidt with Guggenheim. Your line is open. Hi, good morning. This is Paul on for Michael. Thanks for taking our question. Sure. Just one more from us on the BLA filing. You previously mentioned the method validation for potency assays as part of the work in progress, which has caused some issues for other cell therapies during the process. Maybe just your thoughts on similarities or differences from others on potency assays and your confidence in aligning with the FDA there. I'll ask John to cover that one. John? Yeah. Yeah. On the potency assay, we're validating the same potency assay for our drug product that we used in the clinic. We feel pretty confident about being able to successfully complete that validation. You know, obviously, we have the MAGE-A4 target to test against, which is a little different than what some of the other companies, particularly the TIL companies, have had to face. For those two reasons, I think we're in good shape from a potency assay perspective. Okay, great. Thanks. Then just secondly, really quickly, on the ASCO data, will this update for lete-cel primarily be updated analyses in patients for whom we've already seen data, or will there be any new patients from cohort one in the update at ASCO? Thanks. What will be different about the ASCO evaluation presentation will be that we're combining data from the phase 1 study and the phase 2 study in patients with sarcoma. It'll be a larger data set, which will allow us to, you know, look at contributing factors to efficacy in a more robust fashion. Specifically to your point, there aren't any new patients. There aren't significant new patients in that data set. Yeah significant numbers. I mean, it's a pooled data set which makes it larger. Yeah. Got it. Thank you. Thank you. We have a question from Nick Abbott with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Oh, good morning. I have a question on the IL-7 TIL, and that is obviously use the NFAT promoter to control IL-7. Makes sense. My question is, what are the levels of IL-7 that you expect to reproduce? And are these sufficient to support other T-cell populations, you know, on the hopeful assumption that TIL induced antigen spreading? And then I have a follow-up. Thank you. Okay. We'll get back to you on the levels of IL-7 produced, and we have the presentation at ASGCT that I think will deal with that. What's your follow-up? Got another one from the ASGCT. Okay. it's, you know, do you think you'll be able to measure the level of IL-7 in patients, and could it correlate to TIL quality for want of a better term, as you know, you would interpret the data from TIL as reflective of varying levels of T cells able to effectively target the tumor. Hopefully better TIL quality products might produce more IL-7, but I don't know if you expect to be able to measure that in patients. Yeah. Sorry, Nick. Sorry. Let me just try and address that. First of all, we can measure IL-7 in patients, but what's really important is the IL-7 in the tumor. The way that the construct is made is that the IL-7 production is actually triggered by T-cell activity. The action will actually be inside the tumor. There are ways that we can assess that with post-treatment tumor biopsies, and systemic measurements of IL-7 will be a part of it. There'll be other translational ways to look at activation of T cells and other markers that we'll use to assess the impact of IL-7 in addition to, you know, the efficacy itself. Fair enough. Thank you. Thanks, Nick. Thank you. We have a question from Peter Lawson with Barclays. Your line is open. Good morning. This is Shay on for Peter Lawson. Thanks for taking the question. Just briefly on the pre-BLA meeting, I believe you mentioned you hadn't set up a date for that, but could we expect an update when you have it, particularly around the manufacturing and release testing? Is there any sense of timing for when that might happen over the next few months here? Secondly, if you could talk a little bit about how you're thinking about prepping for the launch now ahead of that filing and what the next steps are there. Third, just briefly as well on the NIVO cohort, are you expecting to just have this in the phase 1, or are you already planning to incorporate this into your phase 2, SURPASS-2 and SURPASS-3? What might that look like there? Thank you. First question around the pre-BLA meeting. Typically that will happen a few months ahead of the file. We anticipate that later this year. We will update on the progress on that and on all of the milestones that we've outlined between now and the BLA. With respect to what your second question was with respect to launch, what was the question there? Yes. Correct. The launch. When might you expect to do that, or at least in 2023? Okay. I'll ask Cintia Piccina, Chief Commercial Officer, to just touch on that. Cynthia. Thank you, Adrian. We're planning to submit by the end of the year and so hopefully be able to launch by the end of next year. The launch preparation is going great. We're leveraging a lot of the expertise that we already have at the sites, from a clinical perspective, from a clinical operations perspective, and putting the team together to really have a launch that will be very focused on the centers of excellence. It is an ultra-rare disease, and we have the opportunity to also be extremely customer-centered as we are very focused on cell therapies alone. Really very agile and focused in leveraging our expertise for the launch. With respect to nivolumab in the phase 1 trial and its potential use outside of that phase 1 trial, I'll ask Elliot to comment on that. Yeah. The use of nivolumab is really based on the fact that it's given every four weeks, which fits very well with the way that the current trial is organized. We plan to, you know, test it in phase 1. I mean, I think that that's really the nature of this, the arm of this trial. If we see that there are important efficacy advantages to it, then we certainly could advance that into a later stage trial, just like we look for other signals. We think that this is an important combination to explore. Great. Thank you. Thank you. We have a question from Mara Goldstein with Mizuho. Your line is open. Great. Thanks so much for taking the question. Up first is I'm wondering if you can maybe outline for us sort of where you are in terms of target identification with the Genentech program and how we should think about that for 2022 and 2023. The second just is on the SURPASS-2 and SURPASS-3 programs. You know, what should we think about in terms of what would be considered you know sort of the bar for signal for those programs? I'll ask Helen Tayton-Martin to talk about the status of the Genentech program, and then I'll come back and touch on the bar for our- Thank you. Helen. Hi, Mara. In terms of the Genentech collaboration, the initial targets were already selected at the time of the deals, and they're not disclosed and unlikely to be disclosed in the near term. Targets nominated and, you know, we're pleased with that. The collaboration is moving forward, you know, per the expected plan. I think it's different to the autologous system because here you have a gene-edited stem cell line that we start with. Obviously the focus is there and then constructs drop into that. You know, work is moving forward according to the plan. I think, you know, we're really pleased with the collaboration. I think, you know, more to come. Milestones will really probably be around the anniversary payments and also research payments that become due, and we'll update on those in due course. Okay. Thank you. Thanks, Helen. With respect to the level of signal, I think there's a general answer and a specific answer. The general answer, which we've given quite a lot, is you anticipate that at least three out of ten patients show significant efficacy in the IA response in order to identify that that's sufficient efficacy to be thinking about taking that forward. Obviously with individual tumor types, as Elliot referred to earlier, there are specific patient populations that exist within specific treatment paradigms, and the bars for efficacy maybe will vary across the tumor types that we're studying. That that's one of the things that we're taking into consideration as we go into SURPASS-2 and SURPASS-3. For SURPASS-1 in terms of signal, three out of 10 responses with reasonable durability in what is, you know, inherently a very late end stage patient population. Okay. Thank you. Just- Sorry. No. That's it. Thank you. I'm showing no other questions in the queue. I'd like to turn the call back to Adrian Rawcliffe for any closing remarks. Thanks. As I conclude the call, I want to just refer back to our ambition to transform the lives of people with cancer by designing and delivering cell therapies, which as I opened with, is not a short-term ambition, but we do have short-term deliverables against that. We have chosen to go after difficult to treat solid tumors, and in that context, we are about to submit the BLA for our first product. We have shown significant responses across multiple indications with our first next gen product, and I look forward to updating that at ESMO. More broadly, we are developing the manufacturing capabilities to deliver the commercial product and products for our clinical trial, and we are well underway to finalize construction for our first allogeneic manufacturing facility. Overall, I believe we are in a strong position to deliver against the ambition, both for people with cancer and for investors. Thank you for listening. With that, we'll close the call. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.