Good afternoon. Thank you for attending today's agilon health second quarter 2022 earnings call. My name is Forum, and I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will remain muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. It is now my pleasure to pass the conference over to our host, Matthew Gillmor, Vice President of Investor Relations. Mr. Gillmor, please proceed. Thank you, Forum. Good evening and welcome to our call. With me is our CEO, Steve Sell, and our CFO, Tim Bensley. Following prepared remarks from Steve and Tim, we will conduct a Q&A session. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that our remarks and responses to questions may include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those stated or implied by forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in our SEC filings. Please note that we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Additionally, certain financial measures we will discuss in this call are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that providing these measures helps investors gain a better and more complete understanding of our financial results and is consistent with how management views our financial results. Reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure is available in the earnings press release and Form 8-K filed with the SEC. With that, let me turn the call over to Steve. Thanks, Matt. Good evening, and thanks for joining us. We've had a very strong first six months of the year, and our performance demonstrates rapid progress against our vision to transform healthcare and communities across the country by empowering primary care doctors. The new primary care model we have created with our partners aligns physician outcomes with improvements in the quality, experience, and cost of their senior patients' total care. As a result, senior patients are living longer, healthier lives, and primary care doctors are enjoying greater satisfaction as they share in the success of a more holistic and effective approach to patient care. We have now created a true national network of like-minded physicians, and with the record class of 2023, we will have 2,200 primary care doctors and nearly 500,000 senior patients on the platform, which will make agilon one of the largest organizations in the country supporting full risk care for senior patients. As we have recently announced with our local partners, this class will include four new states, Maine, Minnesota, South Carolina, and Tennessee. By being first in these states with a scaled multi-payer full risk model, we will shape the evolution of value-based care in these markets for decades. The combination of agilon's partner success and macro forces at the national level has created a material acceleration in physicians seeking a new primary care model. Now to the focus of today's call. I will cover three areas in my remarks. First, highlights from our second quarter and key performance drivers. Second, an update on the implementation for the class of 2023 and new partner development for 2024. Third, a quick comment on our upcoming Pod Leadership Retreat in Maine and how we leverage our growing physician network. Our second quarter results were strong. Membership, revenue, and adjusted EBITDA all came in above the high end of our guidance. This was driven by inline MA medical margin performance, which included dilution at the unit level from higher than forecasted membership growth. Direct Contracting results were ahead of expectations, with strong underlying trends in revenue and medical margin. Most importantly, when considering the combined Medicare Advantage and Direct Contracting results, the value of a primary care physician being on the agilon network continues to increase. Ultimately, this is helping to fuel our growth and ability to improve patient care in more communities. Our growth continues to benefit from the embedded membership in our physician partners' practices and our established position as a first mover introducing multi-payer full risk models in our markets. MA and Direct Contracting live membership on the platform reached 352,000 members, an increase of 114,000 members year to date. This growth is a function of outsized performance in new year one geographies, continued strong same geography growth in year two-plus markets, and the expansion of Direct Contracting from six to 10 geographies at the beginning of the year. From a margin perspective, our MA medical margin increased by 49% to $82 million or $103 per member per month in the second quarter, up from $95 per member per month a year ago. Medical margin performance was consistent with our expectations, with strong performance in our partner markets offsetting dilution at the unit level from higher membership growth. As we have discussed with you, our ability to grow membership and profitability at the same time is a hallmark of our capital-efficient partnership model. Importantly, we share these economics with our physician partners and the local communities we serve. Year-to-date, we have reinvested over $80 million back into our local communities. This reinvestment is helping to sustain and grow access to primary care and transform healthcare delivery. Our medical margin performance reflects positive momentum within our 16 partner markets. In our 10 partner markets that have been live more than a year, medical margin per member per month on a year-to-date basis increased by 26% from $108 to $136. This is a key metric for our business, and this increase was entirely driven by efficiency within our healthcare claims expense. One of the clinical drivers behind this performance is our ability to increase access to primary care services, including touch points with complex high-risk seniors. To be clear, greater access for high-risk patients is made possible by two things that are fundamental to our model. First, our primary care partners are now in a business model that rewards them for creating time in their schedule for complex seniors. Second, through the agilon platform, our PCP partners better understand who their high-risk patients are and when a proactive visit would be most valuable. Physicians in traditional fee for service or even partial risk don't have a business model that rewards this type of investment. We are also encouraged by the early performance of our six year one markets. These new partners are achieving results typically seen in more mature markets as they benefit from implementing best practices from across the agilon network. As I noted earlier, Direct Contracting performance was positive during the quarter and included strong gains in margins and 63% year-over-year membership growth. Direct Contracting allows our physician partners to have a single full risk model across their entire Medicare panel and leverages existing investments we have made into Medicare Advantage. In terms of profitability to agilon, our strong performance in Medicare Advantage and Direct Contracting, combined with platform support cost leverage, translated to adjusted EBITDA of $7 million during the quarter and $20 million year to date, which is nearly a tenfold increase from $2 million last year. Tim will provide some additional color in his remarks. Let me turn now to an update on our implementation work for the class of 2023 and new partner development for 2024. For our seven new partners starting in 2023, we are currently focused on two key areas for the back half of the year. First, establishing clinical processes that will support our performance in year one, which includes expanding access for members so they can do things like see their primary care physician for an annual wellness visit. These processes also help us to identify high-risk members that will need more proactive support from the care team over the coming months and years. Our second focus area is completing contracts with health plans, both national and regional. We are making strong progress on both fronts, and our new partners continue to benefit from the broader agilon network. As we complete the payer contracting into year-end, we will update you on a refreshed class of 2023 membership outlook, just as we have done in the past with prior classes. With respect to new partners for 2024, our business development team has made great progress in the last couple of months. The breadth and depth of the pipeline remains very strong, and we are seeing significant opportunities across diverse partner types and geographies. This includes all types of physician organizations, including independent groups and health systems in both new and existing states. I'm pleased to share with you that we have already signed two letters of intent for 2024, and we will begin implementing these partners in the coming months. The inflection in demand we are seeing reflects macro drivers, namely payer demands for value and the growing senior population, and the level of success that our partners are seeing on the platform. We believe all 200,000 primary care physicians in the United States will need a new business model for their senior patients over the next decade. Our success will be determined by the value we create for these PCPs, their patients, and their communities. We believe our approach has clear advantages, and this is becoming increasingly visible every day. I wanted to close by highlighting an example of how we reinforce and leverage the power of agilon's growing network of 2,000+ primary care doctors. Tomorrow, we will kick off our pod leadership meeting in Portland, Maine, which will bring together over 100 physicians from across the agilon network. These pod leaders serve as mentors to smaller groups of PCPs within their respective practices, which helps to reinforce clinical best practices. We have found that these smaller physician pods are highly effective in driving outcomes and reducing variability, especially in areas like high-risk member touches, which we talked about earlier. Over the weekend, we will examine several case studies from across the network, and how our pod leaders can become even more effective. Our ability to share best practices between our partner groups is getting stronger and stronger. This is reinforcing the sense of empowerment primary care physicians gain from being a part of the agilon network and helps to drive performance for both new and mature partners. With that, let me turn things over to Tim. Thanks, Steve, and good evening. I'll now review highlights from our second quarter results and our guidance for the third quarter and full year 2022. Starting with our membership growth for the second quarter, total members live on the agilon platform, including both Medicare Advantage and Direct Contracting, increased to 352,000, with Medicare Advantage membership coming in above our previous guidance for the quarter. Our consolidated Medicare Advantage membership increased 44% to 261,000, and our Direct Contracting membership increased 63% to over 90,000. Our Medicare Advantage membership growth was driven by the addition of six new geographies in January and 13% same geography growth in existing markets. Direct Contracting membership benefited primarily from the addition of new markets joining the program. Revenues increased 34% on a year-over-year basis to $670 million during the second quarter. Year-to-date, revenues increased 45% to $1.32 billion. Revenue growth was mostly driven by membership gains from our new and existing geographies. Normalized for the timing of a large retroactive group contract in the prior year, revenues would have grown 42% in the second quarter. On a per member per month basis, or PMPM, revenue declined 2% during the quarter, which primarily reflects market and member mix, as well as the expiration of the sequester moratorium. Medical margin increased 49% year- over- year to $82 million during the second quarter. Year-to-date, medical margin increased 57% to $168 million. Even with the dilution from our membership growth, medical margins increased as a percentage of revenue and on a PMPM basis. Medical margins were 12.2% of revenue during the second quarter compared to 11.1% last year, and medical margin PMPM increased 8% to $103 compared to $95 last year. Medical margin growth was primarily driven by the maturation of our year two- plus partner markets and member cohorts, which offset the dilution from stronger membership growth. On a year-to-date basis, medical margin PMPM in our 10 partner markets that have been live more than one year increased 26% from $108 to $136. Utilization trends were consistent with our expectations and remain near 2019 baseline levels. Utilization for inpatient services continues to run below historic baseline, while outpatient utilization is modestly above baseline. COVID-related utilization was relatively modest in the quarter and similar to prior year. Network contribution, which reflects agilon's share of medical margin, increased 50% to $37 million during the second quarter. Year-to-date, network contribution increased 44% to $78 million. The year-over-year increase in network contribution reflects the gain in medical margin as well as the relative contribution of medical margin across our geographies. Platform support costs, which include market and enterprise-level G&A, increased 18% to $36 million. On a year-to-date basis, platform support costs increased 19% to $70 million. Growth in our platform support costs continues to trend well below our revenue growth and highlights the light overhead structure of our partnership model. As a percentage of revenue, platform support costs declined to 5% during the second quarter compared to 6% last year. Our adjusted EBITDA was $7.5 million in the quarter compared to -$1.7 million last year. On a year-to-date basis, adjusted EBITDA was +$19.5 million compared to +$2.1 million last year. The increase to adjusted EBITDA reflects the gain in network contribution and leverage against platform support, as well as a +$6.2 million dollar contribution from Direct Contracting. Direct Contracting performance during Q2 was solid, reflecting positive trends in both revenue and claims expense. Medical margins for our DCEs increased over 100% in the quarter to $21 million and increased 12% on a PMPM basis to $79. Results from our Direct Contracting Entities are reflected on a net basis within other income. Turning to our balance sheet and cash flow. As of June 30th, we had over $950 million in cash and marketable securities and under $50 million in outstanding debt. Given the strength of our balance sheet and low capital requirements, we invested $285 million of our cash into U.S. Treasuries and high-quality corporate debt during the quarter. These investments are reflected in the marketable securities lines in our balance sheet. Cash flow from operations was - $60 million for the quarter, which was consistent with our expectations. The increased use of cash this quarter primarily reflects the timing of risk pool settlement for their health plans, which we expect will normalize in the back half of the year. We remain extremely well-capitalized and do not anticipate needing any external capital to drive our future growth. Turning now to our financial guidance for the third quarter and full year 2022. For the third quarter, we expect ending membership live on the agilon platform will grow 50% at the midpoint to a range of 348,000-356,000. This includes Medicare Advantage membership of 263,000-266,000 and Direct Contracting membership of 85,000-90,000. We anticipate revenue in a range of $645 million-$655 million, or 42% growth at the midpoint. We expect continued progression with our medical margin and adjusted EBITDA as members and markets mature on the platform. For the third quarter, we expect medical margin in a range of $65 million-$70 million, representing 55% growth and adjusted EBITDA of -$2 million to -$5 million compared to -$14 million in the prior year. We estimate Direct Contracting will contribute low to single digit EBITDA in the third quarter and for the second half of 2022. For the full year 2022, we have raised our membership and revenue outlook to reflect greater pull-through of commercial agents and year one market membership, while largely maintaining medical margin and adjusted EBITDA, as these members generally start with lower than average margins. We now expect total membership on the agilon platform will grow over 49% year-over-year to 345,000-355,000, with revenue growth of 43% at the midpoint to a range of $2.615 billion-$2.635 billion. We continue to expect significant gains in medical margin and adjusted EBITDA. We now anticipate medical margin in a range of $292 million-$305 million and continue to expect adjusted EBITDA in a range of breakeven to +$10 million, which represents a year-over-year gain in adjusted EBITDA of approximately $40 million-$50 million. With that, we're now ready to take your questions. Operator? Okay, Forum, I think we're ready for Q&A if you want to open it up. Absolutely. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If for any reason you would like to remove that question, please press star followed by two. Again, to ask a question, press star one. As a reminder, if you are using a speakerphone, please remember to pick up your handset before asking your question. Our first question comes from the line of Lisa Gill with JPMorgan. Lisa, your line is now open. Thanks very much, and thank you for taking my questions. I have a couple, if I can. You know, Steve, let me start with comments around entering four new states. Obviously, we knew about Maine at the Analyst Day, but how are you thinking about the opportunities in some of those other states? I think you talked about Tennessee, South Carolina, Minnesota. You know, what are you seeing around the physicians, the opportunities, the class size opportunities? Anything that you can give us around that would be my first question. Yeah. Well, thanks, Lisa. I really appreciate the question. You know, we're really proud of the class of 2023, as we've talked about before. It's a really big deal for us to be able to enter new states. There are a limited set of entry points, and to be able to be first in terms of full risk value-based care, and then do it with a partner at scale that's really well respected and understand those communities is a huge advantage. As I said in my remarks, you know, we believe this gives us the ability to really shape value-based care in these communities for decades. Each one of these groups is wrestling with the challenges of growing senior population and the Medicare fee for service economics, and they've seen the success that our other partners are driving, and they recognize the value of a primary care physician on our platform. They really see opportunities to grow. Let me walk through these just a little bit. In Tennessee, we have a great partner in Jackson, Tennessee. This is a rural, underserved market. We have 40+ PCPs that gives us a real scaled position in the market. This is a high growth market, growing about 13% a year in MA, which is well above the national average. What we'll be able to bring in terms of investment and access around primary care and enhanced care team resources will be really transformational. In Charleston, South Carolina, we've got two great groups. They represent about 35% of the independent primary care physicians within that market. That, too, is an incredibly high growth market. As we talk about the value for PCPs, they see a real opportunity to grow in other PCPs that can join in. Finally, in terms of the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area in Minnesota, I was there last week. I'm originally from Minneapolis-Saint Paul, and I think we see a real opportunity to change the trajectory in that market. We're working with both regional and national players there. It's a market that has large health systems, and these groups are incredibly well-respected. They have great relationships with those systems. We think that they can drive just incredible success for us. I think it's a real positive for us and one that we see driving more growth and very strong performance. Steve, you know, we saw the nice membership growth that you had in the quarter. But how do I think about the impact on MLR, you know, from that higher membership? How does it impact your full year outlook and your ability to really start to manage those costs for those patients? Sure, Lisa. Very proud of our quarter and the growth. Our extra growth was about 5,000 members above the high end of our Medicare Advantage membership guidance, about 8,000, I think, above the average. That's really a function of strong same-geography growth. This quarter, the big chunk of that was in our year-one markets, those that went live as of January 1st, and seeing a faster pull-through by working with these health plans of that membership. We're executing better. The dilution in the quarter was about 30 basis points from that extra membership. Tim can walk you through kind of how that carries forward into the second half guidance. I guess what I'm really proud of is we talked about the key metric being our year two- plus markets and their performance, and that step up year-over-year from $108 PMPM to $136. That really allows us to grow year one markets even more, to absorb it in the quarter, and really drive strong performance. As well as this is the first quarter that we've had a year-over-year comparison in Direct Contracting, and that strong performance jumping from $71 PMPM a year ago up to $79, growing 63% as Tim talked about. Those two things will carry into the second half forecast. Tim? Yes, Steve, a couple of things. That was great. A couple of things I would add is that incremental membership that we grew over our guidance range in, on average, it was about 5,000 members on the high end of our range, drove really almost all of or the lion's share of the incremental revenue. We were about $18 million higher than the high end of our guidance also on revenue. That incremental revenue really does flow through to very little medical margin initially because of the reasons Steve talked about. You know, a lot of those members are either agents, which come in at a very low medical margin or actually growth from our newest markets, our year one markets, which are also, you know, starting at a lower medical margin. You know, the overall medical margin flowing through from those was really less than $500,000 in the quarter, you know, hence the 20-30 basis points, depending on how you want to look at it, of dilution. you know, notwithstanding that, I think you know, pretty happy with the overall numbers. You know, the medical margin dollars that we delivered of $82 million were you know, at the high end of our guidance. you know, the overall MLR that we delivered of 87.7% is still a pretty big increase over a year ago, so we're happy with that as well. Obviously, those numbers also include some prior period development in them. As we look forward into the second half of the year, which I think, Lisa, was the other part of your question, you know, we had a pretty nice improvement in MLR in the first half of this year. When you adjust for some of that prior period development, it was about 190 basis points improvement. In the second half of the year, we're essentially forecasting the same kind of improvement when you look at our guidance now. You know, the second half, we've also guided to incremental revenue. I think the H2 incremental revenue over the former high end of our guidance is about $27 million. Again, almost all that's going to be driven by the incremental membership growth that we've now guided to, which will flow through to a pretty low medical margin number and be, you know, relatively dilutive, but still, it'll allow us to deliver that, you know, 190 or so basis points increase in MLR in the second half. That's really helpful. Just a point of clarification, Tim. You know, one of your competitors talked about Direct Contracting having a retroactive adjustment of roughly 7.5%. Did that not impact you, or were you able to just kind of work through that? You know, as you talked about the increase on a PMPM basis, but that kind of stood out to me that it didn't seem to impact you in the same way. That's really a great question. You know, just two seconds on the way the model works, Lisa. You know, the CMLI comes out at the beginning of the year and tells you, "Hey, here's what we expect your trend to be," which drives the revenue number. The way they set up this year was they originally said. By the way, they used 2019 as a baseline. The idea was, 2022 trend will be 16.1% over that 2019 baseline. Obviously, there were some low years in there, including 2020, which was a decline. What that really implied for year-over-year in 2022 was more than a 10% increase. When we went into the year, and we talked a little bit about this in Q1, we looked at it and said, "That looks really high to us." We've got a lot of experience now. We have a lot of members on the platform. We've got a lot of data, and our analysis said, "That number feels high. We're expecting that there's going to be some, you know, relatively sizable retro trend adjustments during the year." When we booked our Q1, we actually booked an assumption of a retro trend adjustment even though it hadn't happened yet. Then, of course, when we booked Q2, we're already booking in line with that kind of a number. I think the actual adjustment that CMMI announced in their May update was 7.9% off that 16.1%. What we've been both booking to and our assumption for the full year is much more in line with, you know, with a sizable retro trend adjustment. We're not seeing that kind of swing back and forth quarter to quarter. Okay, great. Thanks for all the details, and congrats on the quarter. Sure. Thanks. Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from the line of Justin Lake with Wolfe Research. Justin, your line is now open. Thanks. Appreciate the questions. First, just following up on what you just talked about, on Direct Contracting. What is, when they're looking at 2019 to 2022? You're saying 2019 to 2022 was, I think you said 16%, 17%, now it's adjusted lower. It was supposed to be 17%, now it's 10%. Is that the way to read it? No. I am just trying to give it to you in two different ways. They quote to everybody the trend number of 2022 over 2019, which was about 16.1%. Now, if you wanna look at that and say, "Well, what is that 2022 over 2021?" That same 16% would have implied over a 10% improvement in a 10% trend in 2022 over 2021. They've adjusted those numbers, or they announced a, you know, interim retro trend adjustment sort of guidance of down 7.9% from that number in their May update. That's the way that works. You know, for us personally, we had already accounted for a retro trend adjustment because we've, you know, we've been through this last year. We kinda saw how that went. We've got a lot of data now. We were able to do our own estimate of what we think the trend's gonna be, and we expected there to be a retro trend adjustment. We were already accruing for that in Q1 even before the May announcement came out. I will say that the underlying Direct Contracting performance, though, is still really strong, and we're very happy. Yeah. You know, big increase in membership, right? I think from year-end, we've increased, like, 39,000 members. From a year ago, we've increased something like 34,000 members. And even with that increase, you know, as Steve spoke about, we're seeing a pretty nice pickup in medical margin, either on a PMPM basis. I think $79 this Q2 over $71 in the first quarter, second quarter of last year, which was the first quarter we had it. That's like a 50 basis point pickup in the MLR. You know, we're seeing really positive trends in the second year, notwithstanding that huge membership growth, both in claims and our ability to drive revenue. Membership and revenue, so we're pretty pleased with it. Yeah. Justin, just a quick add. I mean, we're 90,000 members in Direct Contracting now. It's 25% of our membership. You know, I know we don't consolidate revenue, but on a revenue equivalent basis, it's a larger percentage of that. We spent a lot of time with the innovation center, and we certainly learned a lot through the first year. I think what Tim just described is really kind of a prudent approach to what we're doing. I think it gives us just incredible confidence around our strategy, right? We sort of said all along, we're gonna look at this as a single line of business. Our partners, on average, have 400 senior patients across Direct Contracting and Medicare Advantage in the 10 markets where we've got both. They're now seeing the real power that's being driven off of that. We've got over $100 PMPM year to date in MA. We're approaching $80 PMPM in Direct Contracting, all with the growth that Tim just talked about. I think the power of that approach and the first time we've been able to now do a year-over-year comparison, I realize it's in a different spot, and you gotta go pull it out of the 10-Q, but Tim teed it up for you. It's extremely encouraging to me and to all of our partners, and I think other physicians out there are seeing that, and that's how we're seeing this uptake in terms of growth with other physicians joining the platform. Justin, if I can just add one other thing real quick. We don't obviously consolidate these results. We just report them on a net basis and other income. We do actually report out, so you can obviously pick those up in our 10-Q. Just as a point of comparison, I mean, we've generated over $500 million of revenue in Direct Contracting through the first two quarters of this year. When you you know, you can pull that out of the 10-Q, but you know, it's a big number. This is really a big part of our business now. Thanks for all the detail. I appreciate it. Couple other numbers questions. One, can you tell us what the drivers of, you know, the negative development has been this year, you know, and versus what normal should be positive to some extent, probably have some reserve for average deviation. How far off are you from where you would have expected to be? You know, have you learned anything from that that you think, you know, educating the reserves going forward, have you increased the reserves or something? Yeah. That's a great question. First of all, you know, our expectation would be, you know, we're always seeking to be correct, right? You know, obviously, it'd be nice to be correct with maybe a little bit of conservatism. You know, obviously, this time around, it was the other way, and we do have some prior period development. The drivers of it were really a couple of things that we think are a bit anomalous. One of them was as we've now, you know, started to complete the run-out and through of claims in the back half for the back half of last year, we did see some change in seasonality in the back half where especially Q4 was a little bit higher seasonality of claims than we had seen previously. That caught us a little bit off. We have a couple of large dollar claims that we didn't have visibility to that have become apparent to us now. And then we did have a little bit higher COVID costs than we were originally expecting in Q4, but obviously, you've seen that as we move through the run out. All of those things have kind of contributed and stacked up in one direction to create some you know negative PPD that we've recognized now a little bit in Q1 and some more in Q2. As we go forward, you know, we've actually looked at that seasonality now and included those learnings into how we're both accruing and forecasting for the second half of the year. Our guidance for the second half of the year includes some of those changes that we've seen in trend. You know, we'll just continue, obviously, to use all the data and all the operational information we have and, you know, try to make sure that we're, you know, getting the ball as close to the pin as we can on our accruals. Got it. The last quick one. You said you have two physician groups signed up for 2024. Where would. Correct. Where was that last year in terms of at this point? You know, how many did you have in 2020, you know, 2021 at this point and 2020, maybe just to give us a little bit of comparability? Thank you. Yeah. I mean, it's a quick one, Justin. We've never had groups sign up this early. When we talk about an inflection in demand, when we talk about groups understanding the value that they have and what they can achieve through a partnership with agilon, that's accelerating this. The two that we've signed last year at this point, we had zero, and every year prior to that. We, we've had zero. These will have, you know, 16, 18-month implementations, which should give us just a tremendous leap forward. The rest of the funnel for 2024 looks extremely strong, basically at every step down on that process from qualifying all the way down to signing letters of intent like we talked about. We're ahead of where we've been, and I think it's a function of just what we talked about, which is the challenge that these practices face, the need for this new model, the success that we've had, and the ability to talk to enough peers now so that it's not agilon telling them, it's a peer who went through a similar decision. Perfect. Thanks again, guys. Yes. Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Baxter with Wells Fargo. Stephen, your line is now open. Yeah. Hi, thanks. Wanted to ask a big picture question on the medical margin performance. We've generally heard from your health plan partners that the utilization environment, especially for, you know, for Medicare and Medicaid, you know, is pretty benign, running below baseline levels. I know you're characterizing as, you know, closer to baseline levels. Also, you know, I think you said your markets, your year one markets are performing a bit ahead of plan. The combination of these two things, I guess maybe I'm a little bit surprised that maybe the medical margin guidance on a dollar basis, like, I guess, it's diluted impact new members have on the percentage. I guess I'm a little bit surprised the dollar basis, you know, maybe has not increased more throughout the year. Essentially, the health plans seem to be saying, you know, they're expecting higher utilization in the future than they're seeing today. It doesn't necessarily seem to be the way that you guys are thinking about it. Would love to just get your insight into, you know, some of the, maybe the things that could be holding back, the medical margin dollar guidance from improving this year, and also thoughts on kind of your view of utilization versus maybe some of your health plan partners. Thanks. Yeah, Steve, absolutely. You know, I think our medical margin forecast for the second half of the year, first of all, we do have a little more confidence in the range, and we tightened it up a little bit by raising the lower end of the range. That is based on some of the performance that we've seen so far this year. Our expectation is that, you know, so far through the year, we have seen utilization, you know, just slightly below that 2019 baseline. Now, you know, I don't know, as everyone's talking about, there's a couple of different components of that, and we've talked about this on previous calls, but it's still pretty consistent. You know, acute utilization is definitely below baseline, but we're seeing a pretty good offset for that in outpatient, and that kind of continues. That's what we've basically built into our balance of year as well, that we're gonna continue to see those utilization numbers. That hasn't changed since our previous guidance, although we did tighten up the range a little bit, as I said, because we have a little bit more confidence. I mean, in addition to that, of course, we did increase our revenue guidance. I think as we talked about earlier on the call, you know, we wouldn't expect that to flow through to much incremental medical margin because it's primarily being driven by, you know, incremental agents or more members in our year one geography markets. Yeah. Stephen, I would just add. Go ahead. Go ahead, of course. What I was just, If you wanted to add on to that. Okay. What I was gonna add to what Tim said is, I mean, he just gave you the context earlier about kind of run rate, first half performance relative to last year, first half to first half, and continuing that forward. You know, that first half performance has the clinical programs that we've invested in, and those kind of expand throughout the year. The utilization comments he made about being in line, I think is right on. Okay. No, appreciate that. Then just on the managed care contracting side of things. I do remember, you know, maybe earlier in the process when you guys were going public, there were some markets where, you know, some of the national plans participated in some but not others. I just love an update, you know, as the health plans have seen more data. Has the kind of the coverage of your markets of the national health plans changed at all, or is that still an opportunity for you guys in the future? Well, we have very deep partnerships with five national payers. We have joint operating committees. We plan growth. I mean, there are markets that they would like us to expand to that we're planning on. In every market in which we're working with a national plan that we've approached them on, we've been able to contract and do that successfully. I think the depth of that relationship is pretty significant, Stephen, and I think there's a lot of opportunity in terms of additional markets going forward. Stephen, I think what is probably differentiated, and Steve can comment on this, is, you know, our ability to contract with regional plans is very differentiated, and that gets us into a lot of different markets. We have a lot of experience with that now. Then our ability to contract and take risk on PPO is also fairly differentiated. It's something that actually drove a little bit of upside in the quarter in terms of the membership pull-through, because there are some attribution processes that go along with taking PPO risk. Yeah. The majority of our health plans, Stephen, have never done full risk contracting before we contract with them. Those are obviously regional payers. Some are relatively new to Medicare Advantage. Our ability to do that, to take full risk on PPO products in many parts of the country that we're the only one doing that, period. For the nationals, for the regionals, I think the partnership is working well. Right. Forum, I think we can go to the next question. Perfect. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Tanquilut with Jefferies. Brian, your line is now open. Thank you. You've actually got Taji Phillips for Brian. Thanks for taking my question. Just curious, as you approach providers for partnerships, can you just clarify the incentive structure there, specifically on the gain share component? Sorry, you broke up. What was the, o n the gain share, asking about the incentives for partners, particularly on the gain share, you mean on like surplus sharing? Let's talk about the partners. Yes. Sorry. Yes. If you didn't catch my question, sorry. Go ahead. I think we got it. I think, yeah. Let me tell you how it works. So, we enter a new market. We talked about four states today that we've entered. We've got a partner in each one of these markets. We enter into an exclusive 20-year joint venture with them. We take all of the downside, we bring the people, the process, the capital to the table. They bring all of the local know-how, the investments they've made, patients, physicians, facilities, et cetera. We put that together, and create a partnership that's focused on Medicare Advantage and focused on moving to full risk. We do that in a 12-month implementation. You know, Justin just asked about some of the timelines. Sometimes it's even longer than that. That implementation is done so that when we hit day one, year one, we're really set. We've got an excellent baseline from a cost perspective and from a revenue perspective. As we talked about in our prepared remarks, we really understand who those complex patients are that need even more services, and we're able to wrap them with a care team. The incentive or the surplus is split 50/50 on the upside. When we talked about investing $80 million back into these communities year to date, that's really a reflection of the surplus that's generated by being able to manage costs and take out waste, and then that less local expenses, that 50% going to those partners. That's how the incentive structure works. Great. Thanks for the color. Sure. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from the line of Whit Mayo with SVB Securities. Whit, your line is now open. Hey, thanks. Good afternoon. You guys have talked around this a little bit, but is there any way to, excuse me, to potentially quantify how much of the member growth you get annually comes from agents? Is this year tracking higher than normal? I mean, are there any really big differences in the conversion ratio on MA and DCE? In the quarter, we were 13% same geography growth. That's a combination of those agents and organic growth, those that are electing and then physicians joining. That physician component continues to grow in the quarter, it was just under half, came from physicians that are joining. That's a very strong component within it. The split on agents versus fee for service, I'm gonna guess it's 80% or more agents. We can work offline with you and get more on that, but I'm guessing that's about what it is. Yeah, of the 13% same geography. No, I. I was gonna say, just to put a finer point on it, the 13% same-geography growth that we reported, about 60% of that in the first half of this year was organic, which is patients or fee-for-service conversions, and the majority of that would have been patients. I don't know the exact percentage breakdown on that part of it, but, y eah. Do you feel like you are seeing a higher conversion of agents this year versus normal years? I'm just wondering if this is a function of, you know, any internal initiatives or just the way the year sort of landing. I think what drove the outsized performance on membership growth in the quarter was a faster pull through with our health plan partners around on PPO products and this attribution work that we do with them. That's a function of working more closely with them, getting that logic agreed to in accelerating the touch points with those patients. As an example, a health plan might require you to have a patient verbally verify that this is their primary care physician before that attribution becomes effective. I think that we are seeing more senior patients choose at a faster rate. I think it's a function of execution. I also think it's a function of their primary care physicians really seeing incredible value and comfort within this. I think it's a combination of those two. Sorry, not to belabor, but nearly all of the incremental membership that we saw versus our guidance in the quarter and for balance of year, the vast majority of that is coming from either agents or incremental members in those year one markets, which are also, you know, because they're in their first year, are lower medical margin PMPM as well. That's kind of what caused the dilution, and it's one of the reasons why, in the second quarter, we can raise our revenue by about $27 million, but don't anticipate that there'll be a huge incremental, you know, medical margin driven by those members. Now ultimately, there will be. You know, we love to get those members on the platform because it means obviously there's a ton of Embedded margin there for us to get as those members mature on the platform. Initially in that first six months in the second half of the year, if they come on, they'll be, you know, pretty low medical margin contribution. Okay, thanks. I'll hop back in the queue. We got a pretty busy night. Thanks, guys. Yes, sir. Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from the line of Kevin Fischbeck with Bank of America. Kevin, your line is now open. Hey, this is Adam Ron on for Kevin. Going back to that gain share discussion, other medical expense came in higher than we were modeling, at least. If you divide other medical expense in live geography divided by medical margins year-to-date, you get about 54%, which is more than the 50%. Is that just timing throughout the year, or how should we think about what's in that line and how exactly we should be modeling that? Yeah, other medical expenses has two components to it. Part of it is the partner sharing, and part of it is the actual other medical expenses, which the primary portion of that is another incentive that we pay to physicians, which are incentives we pay for their completion of annual wellness visits. Those are kind of the two components of those, which is one of the reasons why the, you know, partner sharing part itself is not 50% of medical margin because it's, what we're sharing is actually the market level profitability, not the market level medical margin. The reason it starts to approach 50% overall is, other medical expenses that are also deducted, which, you know, other medical expenses, not partner sharing, which are, you know, again, the largest part of that is going to be AWV incentives. There can be some fluctuation quarter-to-quarter. Yeah. Some of it's dependent on, you know, market by market dynamics. For instance, just that part of the broader other medical expenses that is not partner sharing, the part that's, for instance, AWV expenses, you know, that can be accelerated earlier in the year if we're completing those, you know, more quickly. Obviously, that would be a good thing if we get them done earlier in the year. That's kind of how that works. Okay, got it. Some other point is there was some discussion in your quarter about Medicaid investigation on a business that you no longer own, but just curious if you could comment on that and what’s happening with that in California? I think he's talking about the He's talking about California. Yeah. I mean, so, you know, we've been out of California for a couple of years now. I think it was really a strategy decision. That's a delegated model state, Kevin, in which to basically be able to pass risk, you have to have an MSO. The groups pay the claims, they do the UM, they do a lot of the customer service around that. Very different from what we do in other places. The logic was really focus on the partner business, and that's what most of the country looks like, much more PPO products in other places. That's kind of logic around that. Within the Medicaid business, that was a part of what we had there in California. I think that's progressing in terms of where we're at right now. You can, of course, read our SEC filings. There's information about the divestiture. It does reference some non-compliance issues that were actually self-disclosed by agilon. Those predominantly predated agilon's ownership, and you can read about that in our filings. The penalties that were paid by some of the health plans were relatively immaterial. Encourage you to read our SEC filings on that. Thanks. Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Daniels with William Blair. Ryan, your line is now open. Yeah. Hey, guys. This is Jack Senft for Ryan Daniels. Thank you for taking my question, and congrats on the solid quarter. I just wanted to first touch on the conversations you're having with clients and specifically other health systems. Just kind of curious how that's progressed during, you know, this more volatile market, and especially as it relates to MaineHealth. Are you still continuing to see an uptick in conversation with health systems? If so, you know, do you see that kind of stemming from the MaineHealth partnership announcement, or is it more, you know, just from the overall thematic trend, and from the shift from fee for service to value-based care? You know, is it a little of both? Just kind of curious if you have any comments on that. Thanks. Yeah. I mean, I think health systems are a tremendous opportunity for us. I think that we're seeing pretty robust conversations with a number of health systems. I do think that the MaineHealth announcement certainly helps that. There's also a series of health systems within, you know, existing geographies where we've got a partner that, you know, there's some dialogue. I think that health systems face a lot of the same challenges in terms of Medicare. I think they face the same challenges in terms of primary care, in terms of what it's costing to subsidize those primary care physicians and how they really integrate them. I think increasingly, they're realizing the value that they have within that, and the opportunity for, you know, this new primary care model. It's a tremendous opportunity for us. We've got a number of conversations going on that. The last thing I'll say is these tend to take longer, just given the size and the complexity of these health systems and the number of stakeholders that are involved, but we're encouraged. Great. Understood. Thank you. Just as a really quick follow-up regarding guidance. So just given third quarter guidance and then calculating out the implied fourth quarter guidance, it appears as though like revenue will be flat to just slightly up in the fourth quarter. Am I thinking of this correctly? Is there any additional information that you might have on how we should kind of think of the revenue cadence during the remainder of the year? That is a good question. I don't think it's flat in the fourth quarter. Normally, what you'd expect in our seasonality is for you know, revenues not to grow much during the year. Part of what's going on there is just the seasonality of the business. Oh, I thought you meant flat versus prior year. I was like, it's not flat versus prior year in the fourth quarter. You mean flat quarter to quarter? Sorry. Yes. Sequentially. Sorry. Yeah, yeah. No, that's exactly what. Sorry, I was misinterpreting here. Like, we're definitely not gonna be flat year-over-year. Yeah, that's typically what's gonna happen. As we move through the year, we will pick up more members, but our revenue PMPM will start to decline a bit as well. The reason for that is, I think what Matthew was just about to say is, as we lose the older members that were on our platform as they attrit off the platform as we move through the year, those are the higher revenue PMPM members. The new members that come on, which as we talked about before, are primarily agents that have very low revenue PMPM, partly by the fact that when they age in, they have, you know, we have kind of a default, very low RAF score that goes against their each of those members. So we would expect that revenue PMPMs kind of decline a bit as you move through the year. Now, that's offset. Total revenue dollars now are helped out by the fact that we're also increasing members. But the two of those, you know, can result in either, you know, that revenue number staying from Q3 to Q4 relatively constant in dollars or maybe even dropping a little bit in Q4. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. I appreciate that. By the way, just in case everybody didn't pick up on it, the other factor that'll affect obviously second quarter revenue or second half, sorry, revenue PMPM, is we'll see the second half of the, you know, reinstitution of the sequester as well. Had about a 1% impact on Q2, but it'll have a full 2% impact for the back half of the year. Perfect. Our next question comes from the line of Gary Taylor with Cowen. Gary, your line is now open. Hi, good afternoon. Good evening, guys. A few questions I just wanna come back to. Just on DCE, if CMS was, you know, implying a 10% for 2022 versus 2021, they backed 7.9% out of it, so they're, you know, low 2s% fee-for-service costs growth. That actually seems awfully low in terms of how I'd imagine the year plays out. Will they look at this every quarter? Do you have any visibility on when the next retro might be? Yeah. Yeah. Gary, a couple things. One is that does seem low, and I think, you know, they do an update in May. They'll do another one later this month, and they'll do another one in November. Not every quarter, but three times a year. We look at kind of all the overall trends from the data we have, and so we kind of make our own estimate of how we think that'll work over the full year. We'll get another update in August, but it does feel like the 7.9% adjustment is probably high and may be driven by just, you know, essentially what the first quarter looked like, and that may not hold or probably wouldn't hold through the whole year. That's a good call out on that one. Gotcha. Just going to the prior year, developments, a little bit. It's, you know, that's obviously negative, is not what we'd prefer to see. You mentioned a few items it was related to. It's actually fairly small as a percent of yes, last year's medical claims, maybe 70 basis points or so. Since you're, you know, right around break-even EBITDA, it's actually big relative to EBITDA. Just trying to think about the guidance you have for the third quarter on EBITDA. I would imagine at this point in the year, you're not anticipating that there's any development weighing on that number. Is that fair? Yeah. I mean, by this point in the year, you know, the run out of prior year is getting pretty close to complete. It's not 100%, but it's pretty close. That's right. I mean, if we're gonna take prior period negative development from 2021, obviously the vast majority of that would have already been recognized and seen through Q2. How do we think about this quarter where you had guided toward midpoint $5.5 million to EBITDA? You did $7.5 million, but you absorbed $8 million of negative development in the quarter would imply, you know, current year results like well ahead of guidance unless, you know, you're, you know, anticipating there'd still be development based on when Q trends. But is there any nuance to that? Yeah. Clearly not the latter. Yeah, clearly not the latter in terms of anticipating it, but in terms of the former, probably two big drivers. One is the underlying performance of both our partner markets that have been out there for more than one year, as well as better than expected performance in our year one markets that Steve talked about. That underlying performance was definitely better than what we had forecast, and that helped offset it. The second thing was, for the overall EBITDA number that you're pointing to, where we delivered about, you know, $1.5 million or so better than the high end of our guidance, Direct Contracting definitely performed better than we had expected in the quarter. That helped contribute to that number as well. Yeah, Gary, when I step back and look at this combined business that we're running across Medicare Advantage and Direct Contracting. Year-over-year membership is up 50% and even including the prior period you talked about and the dilution from the above forecasted growth, we're growing our med margin PMPM 8%. That is super encouraging for us, and it's really these year two-plus markets just executing really well and starting to see the benefit across MA and DCE. You see it in the year two membership for Direct Contracting as well. There is something to this execution, to the scale, to the consistency and leveraging the investments that we're making that's running through our performance, which we're really encouraged about. Thanks. Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from the line of George Hill with Deutsche Bank. George, your line is now open. Yeah, good evening, guys, and thanks for taking the questions. Steve, I wanna zoom out for a second. It's kind of two big picture questions. Number one is with the entrance of Minneapolis-Saint Paul, I'm trying to find my best view of your kind of service map, but it looks like this is the biggest market from, like, an MSA density perspective that you guys are gonna enter. So I guess I would ask about, like what should we be reading into you guys moving into more dense urban settings. Number two, I'd ask you about comments on kinda the competition for members in market. Like, there's an organization that I would assume that you guys compete with in western Pennsylvania that's like an amalgam of health systems that's trying to do what agilon does. It seems to be wanting to be aggressive in its marketing for members in market. I guess I would ask about like talk to me about the battle for new members and new agents in market and what you guys can do to arm your provider organizations as they try to attract new beneficiaries. Yeah, no, I mean, like, I really appreciate the question, George. Just first point, Detroit would be the largest MSA that we're in, but Minneapolis is clearly right up there. Two is we are moving into these areas. We tend to do it with large groups at scale that have great reputations, and we're first there. You know, in Minneapolis, I was there last week, all of the payers are excited about this. This is a mix of nationals and of locals. And it's, you know, we're encouraged by what's there. That's also a market in which, like I said, there's two large health systems, but there's a number of independents that I think are really excited about this. This idea about the value that each primary care physician can provide, and the benefit that they can see in their practice and the investment back in the community is really resonating. The best way that we compete there is we continue to perform, and we can attract new primary care physicians 'cause they can see the results that their peers are joining. You know, I wrote a note out to our partners just about different announcements out in the space, and it's a great time to be a primary care physician. It's really a sense of urgency that we all have to have to really perform because there is increased competition once you're in a market. We think we've got a lead. We think we're first. We think we're coming at scale, and it's gonna give us that performance benefit. People do have choices, and the best selling pitch we've got is the results that their peers are enjoying that they can get by coming on the platform. Okay. I appreciate that. Thank you. All right. Forum, I think we're gonna go ahead and wrap the call there. Thank you for your question. Operator, so I think we're ready to go ahead and end the call. Perfect. Sounds good. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line. Great. Thanks, everybody.