Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the AGNC Investment Corp third quarter twenty twenty-four shareholder call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star and then one using a touchtone telephone. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Please note, today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Katie Turlington of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you all for joining AGNC Investment Corp's third quarter 2024 earnings call. Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. This conference call and corresponding slide presentation contain statements that, to the extent they are not recitations of historical fact, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All such forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Reform Act. Actual outcomes and results could differ materially from those forecasts due to the impact of many factors beyond the control of AGNC. All forward-looking statements included in this presentation are made only as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change without notice. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements are included in AGNC's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies are available on the SEC's website at sec.gov. We disclaim any obligation to update our forward-looking statements unless required by law. Participants on the call include Peter Federico, Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Bernie Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chris Kuehl, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, Aaron Pas, Senior Vice President, Non-Agency Portfolio Management, and Sean Reid, Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development. With that, I will turn the call over to Peter Federico. Good morning, and thank you for joining our third quarter earnings call. For the last several quarters, we have spoken about a promising and durable investment environment that we believed was unfolding for AGNC. An environment characterized by mortgage spreads that were materially wider than historical norms, declining interest rate volatility, and the emerging accommodative monetary policy stance by the Federal Reserve. In the third quarter, these positive trends became increasingly apparent, and as a result, investor optimism grew. Against this favorable fixed income investment backdrop, AGNC generated a very strong economic return of 9.3% in the third quarter, driven by solid book value growth and our compelling monthly dividend, which has now remained stable at $0.12 per common share for 55 consecutive months. At its September meeting, the Fed began the process of recalibrating monetary policy with an initial rate cut that was larger than many expected. More important than the magnitude of the rate cut itself, the move marked the end of a very challenging three-year period of unprecedented monetary policy restraint. In addition, the Fed also communicated its intention to lower short-term rates to a neutral level over time. Consistent with this view, the September Summary of Economic Projections showed the median federal funds rate declining by 250 basis points by the end of 2026. While the path to this neutral policy stance will undoubtedly depend on economic data, as Chairman Powell explicitly stated, the direction of travel is now clear. This significant transition in monetary policy marked a positive development for AGNC and for fixed income markets, broadly speaking. In response to this improved monetary policy outlook, Treasury rates rallied across the yield curve, with short-term rates declining significantly more than long-term rates. To put the rate moves in perspective, the yield curve ended the quarter with a positive slope for the first time in two years. Agency MBS performance during the third quarter varied considerably by coupon and hedge composition. Our performance benefited from having a diversified mix of assets, as well as a meaningful share of longer-term Treasury-based hedges. From a macro perspective, there were a couple of important takeaways from the third quarter. First, the long-awaited Fed pivot occurred, and consistent with historical experience, the Fed is expected to return the federal funds rate to a neutral level over the next 12 to 24 months. Typically, in such periods of monetary policy accommodation, the yield curve steepens and the demand for high-quality fixed income instruments, like Agency MBS, grows. The other important takeaway from the quarter is that Agency MBS spreads remain in the same relatively narrow trading range that has now been in place for close to a year. This trading range compares very favorably to the highly volatile spread environment that existed while the Fed was aggressively tightening monetary policy. As a levered and hedged investor in Agency MBS, AGNC's return opportunities are most favorable when Agency MBS spreads to swap and Treasury rates are wide and stable, and when interest rates and monetary policy are less volatile. We anticipated that this type of environment would eventually emerge once the Fed transitioned to an accommodative monetary policy stance, which it did at the September meeting. With Agency MBS spreads trading in a relatively narrow range this year, it follows that our common stock net asset value would also be relatively stable. That has been the case, with our net asset value per common share increasing a modest 1.4% over the first nine months of the year. Much more significantly, however, our economic return per common share, which includes the dividends we paid as well as the change in our net asset value, was 13.8% through the first nine months of the year. Similarly, our total stock return, with dividends reinvested, was 17.5% over the same period. This performance exemplifies AGNC's ability to generate very attractive returns in environments where spreads are wide and stable. Looking ahead, we believe the most likely scenario for Agency MBS spreads is that they remain in the current trading range. This view is predicated in part on our belief that the supply and demand dynamics for Agency MBS remain in reasonable balance. Given the recent modest decline in mortgage rates, it is possible that the supply of Agency MBS will increase somewhat over the intermediate term. On the demand side, however, accommodative monetary policy, a steeper yield curve, historically large money market mutual fund balances, and less onerous bank regulation indicate to us that the demand for high-quality fixed income assets is biased to increase as the Fed reduces short-term interest rates. While the path of financial markets is never perfectly smooth and periods of volatility are inevitable, the outlook for Agency MBS is decidedly better today than it was in twenty twenty-two and twenty twenty-three, given the current economic outlook, the stance of the Fed, and our expectation that long-term interest rates and Agency MBS spreads will remain relatively stable. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Bernie Bell to discuss our financial results in greater detail. Thank you, Peter. For the third quarter, AGNC had total comprehensive income of $0.63 per share. Economic return on tangible common equity was 9.3% for the quarter, comprised of $0.36 of dividends declared per common share and an increase in our tangible net book value of $0.42 per share, or 5%. As of late last week, our tangible net book value per common share was down about 3% for October, or about 3.5% after deducting our monthly dividend accrual. Leverage decreased modestly for the quarter to 7.2 x tangible equity as of quarter end, from 7.4 x as of Q2. Additionally, we concluded the quarter with unencumbered cash and Agency MBS of $6.2 billion, or 68% of our tangible equity, which was up from $5.3 billion, or 65% of tangible equity as of June thirtieth. The average projected life CPR for our portfolio at quarter end increased 4% to 13.2%, consistent with the decline in interest rates, while the average coupon in our portfolio was largely unchanged at just over 5% as of 9:30 A.M. Actual CPRs for the quarter averaged 7.3%, up slightly from 7.1% for Q2. Net spread and dollar roll income declined by $0.10 to $0.43 per common share for the quarter, driven by a reduction in our net interest rate spread, which narrowed by approximately 50 basis points to just above 220 basis points for the quarter. About half of the decline in our net interest spread was a result of $6.5 billion of very low-cost pay-fixed swaps that matured during the quarter. We have no additional swaps scheduled to mature until the second quarter of next year. The other half of the decline was due to our decision to further reduce our swap-based hedges and increase our use of Treasury-based hedges, which are not captured in our reported net interest spread. Lastly, in the third quarter, we issued $781 million of common equity through our at-the-market offering program. The significant increase in ATM issuance was consistent with the substantial price-to-book premium of our common stock throughout the quarter and drove material book value accretion for the benefit of our common stockholders. In addition, the positive investment environment provided a favorable backdrop for the deployment of this new capital. And with that, I'll now turn the call over to Chris Kuehl to discuss the Agency mortgage market. Thanks, Bernie. Weaker economic data and increasingly dovish Fed rhetoric provided a constructive backdrop for risk assets and duration throughout the third quarter. The yield curve steepened dramatically, with two-year and ten-year Treasury yields declining 112 basis points and 62 basis points, respectively. Both MBS and corporate credit indices outperformed Treasury benchmarks during the quarter. However, within MBS, performance was heavily influenced by coupon, hedge type, and tenor. Lower coupon MBS, which comprised the vast majority of the Bloomberg MBS Index, outperformed higher coupons in the third quarter, with 4.5% and lower coupons tightening 10 to 15 basis points, while 5% and higher coupons ranged from slightly tighter to modestly wider. The outperformance of lower coupon MBS was driven by favorable technicals, as fixed income bond fund inflows continued to increase at an average weekly pace year-to-date of $8.5 billion, roughly double the pace of last year. These funds are largely index-based, and as such, drove demand for lower coupon MBS. In contrast, the decline in primary mortgage rates, combined with the tail end of elevated seasonal housing activity, led to an increase in supply and relative underperformance of production coupon MBS. Notably, Agency MBS spread volatility has been considerably lower in 2024, with par coupon spreads to a blend of 5- and 10-year Treasury yields, trading in a range of 40 basis points. This compares favorably to 2023 and 2022, when par coupon spreads traded in a range of 75 and 108 basis points, respectively. During the third quarter, we added about $5 billion in Agency MBS, and as a result, our investment portfolio increased to $72.1 billion as of September thirtieth. In terms of portfolio composition, we added approximately $6 billion in pools during the quarter, most of which were in low pay-up categories, while our TBA position declined consistent with conventional rolls trading at relatively weak implied funding levels. Our Ginnie Mae TBA position in aggregate was largely unchanged as of September thirtieth, as valuations remained attractive and roll-implied financing continued to offer an advantage versus repo funding. Hedge positioning was also a material driver of performance during the third quarter, given the combination of yield curve steepening and swap spread tightening. As a result, MBS hedged with longer tenor U.S. Treasury-based instruments generated significantly better total returns. During the third quarter, we decreased our swap-based hedges and increased our allocation to Treasury-based hedges. Importantly, we also continued to increase our use of longer-term hedges, given the shift in monetary policy and our expectations for further yield curve steepening. Consistent with this shift towards longer-term hedges, our overall hedge ratio declined to 72%. We believe longer-term Treasury hedges give us additional protection against the challenges posed by the growing U.S. government debt and ongoing budget deficits. I'll now turn the call over to Aaron to discuss the Non-Agency markets. Thank you, Chris. In early August, as market expectations shifted toward faster rate cuts, credit spreads initially widened. By the end of the quarter, however, broad-based risk -on sentiment pushed macro markets higher. As a result, credit spreads generally ended the quarter unchanged to somewhat tighter. In Q3, the synthetic investment-grade index was close to unchanged, while the high yield index tightened by about fifteen basis points. On the cash bond side, the Bloomberg IG Index narrowed by five basis points, and subsequent to quarter end, has tightened about eight basis points. Last week, this index closed through the tightest levels seen during the COVID QE period and reaching the tightest valuations in the post-Great Financial Crisis era. As we have mentioned before, credit fundamentals continue to show a divided consumer base. Lower-income households continue to face pressure, but we've yet to see significant signs of distress. Our Non-Agency securities portfolio ended the quarter at $890 million, down roughly 5% from the previous quarter, with the composition of our holdings mostly unchanged. The reduction in the portfolio was due to our participation in GSE tender offers for credit risk transfer securities. Lastly, the funding environment for Non-Agency securities remains stable and historically attractive. With that, I'll hand the call back over to Peter. Thank you, Aaron. With that, we'll now open the call up to your questions. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star and then one on your touchtone telephones. If you are using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Once again, that is star and then one to join the question queue. At this time, we'll pause momentarily to assemble the roster. Our first question today comes from Bose George from KBW. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, everyone. Good morning. Just wanted to follow up first on the, you know, the comments you made on the changes to your hedges. So does this, you know, position you better for curve steepening? Is that the sort of driver? Yeah, Bose, that's exactly right. It's a great question. And, you know, Chris mentioned this in his prepared remarks, and we've talked about this now for several quarters, but you really see the impact of it this quarter with our hedge ratio coming down to 72% from 98% the last quarter. And as Chris mentioned, we've systematically shifted our hedges more toward the longer part of the yield curve. In fact, if you think about it from a duration perspective, almost 80% of our hedges come from hedges that are seven years and longer. So we're concentrating our hedge book to have longer-dated instruments with the expectation that the yield curve will steepen over time, and that's consistent with the monetary policy environment that we're in. Also, from our perspective, makes sense for us now to operate with a hedge ratio less than 100%, so that we, over time, will gain some benefit of having some of our debt repricing to the new Fed funds rate. Oh, okay, great. Thanks. And then actually, on the core earnings, you know, obviously makes sense with as the swaps fall off- Yeah You know, the direction of that. You know, just over time, I mean, is the way to think about it is your core earnings should sort of essentially converge with your economic returns. So, you know, if we think you can generate a 17 ROE, that's kind of where core earnings end up? That's exactly right. There's a lot of factors that went into the decline in our net spread and dollar roll income this last quarter. Bernie mentioned, you know, we had $6.5 billion worth of swaps mature this quarter. We actually don't have any swaps maturing over the next two quarters. But more than that, we took some actions to actually reduce our swap book further. Because we did favor Treasury-based hedges, they actually were a better performing hedge, really, for the last several quarters, given the tightening in swap spreads. So we wanted to have more Treasury-based hedges, and that has a direct impact on our net spread and dollar roll income because it doesn't include those hedges. It only includes our Treasury-based hedges. In fact, for example, if you included the carry on our Treasury position, it would probably be somewhere in the neighborhood of about $0.08 of carry on our Treasury position right now that is not captured in that net spread and dollar roll income. So, from that perspective, it's not a significant driver. In fact, it's not a driver at all of our dividend policy. If you think about our net spread and dollar roll income has been well over our dividend now for a couple years, and it hasn't impacted our dividend policy. It's a reflection of the current period income, and even express that on our equity, it translates to a return on equity of somewhere between 19% and 20%. That's still above the long run economics, as you point out. Today, the economics of new mortgages are in the 16% to really 18% range right now. I would expect our net spread and dollar roll income on our margin to compress consistent with that. And the speed and pace of growth of our portfolio also has an impact on that compression. For example, we have raised a lot of capital in the last two quarters, and as Chris has mentioned, we've purchased, over the last two quarters, about $8 billion worth of mortgages. So we've grown our mortgage portfolio at a pace of around 12.5%, and we're bringing those on at those current spreads, call it between 150 and 200 basis points. So that, in and of itself, is driving some of that compression. It's not a number, our net interest margin, nor our net spread and dollar roll income. Those are current period numbers. They're not numbers that affect our dividend policy. We're looking at the long run economics of our portfolio, and we think it still remains very well aligned. Great. That's helpful. Thanks. Sure. Thank you, Bose. Our next question comes from Crispin Love from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead with your question. Thanks, and good morning, everyone. Peter, just following up on that last question. Just based on your comments and expectations of Agency spreads remaining in the current trading range, can you discuss the return expectations in Agency MBS, and then how that compares to your book value yield right now, which is around the mid-teens, about 17% or so? I think you mentioned a normalized level of 16%-18%. So do you feel good about the current dividend level here, that you do have some near-term benefits with the hedges before getting to that 16%-18% level? Yeah, we do feel good about our alignment with our dividend policy and the economics of our portfolio. And there's a couple really takeaways. I mentioned this in my prepared remarks, but the fact that mortgages continue to stay in this same narrower range is a really positive development just overall. I mean, that's from our perspective, mortgages being at wide levels and stable levels allow us to generate the really attractive earnings like we've experienced so far for the first three quarters. And importantly, the spread volatility has come down. Chris mentioned this. You think about that spread range this year, for example, mortgages have only traded in a forty basis point range. Compare that to two years ago, it was over a hundred basis point range. So that obviously has a lot of impact on our risk management position and how we position the portfolio. It does appear to us that mortgages are kind of comfortable in this range, and and if you look back to the end of the quarter to now, mortgages have actually moved back toward the middle of the range. I often refer to the current coupon spread to the five and ten years as just a benchmark. That now is back around close to a hundred and fifty basis points, which is sort of right in the middle of the hundred and forty to hundred and sixty basis point range. And importantly, mortgages current coupon, anyhow, to a blend of swap hedges is somewhere in the hundred and eighty-five basis point range now. So if we're going to use, like we always do, even though we have about 40% of our hedges in Treasuries now, we're always going to use a mix of swaps and Treasuries as hedges. You can think about that spread as being somewhere average, you know, about 170-175 basis points. That translates to really attractive ROEs. That's our base case expectation, is they stay in this range. Great. Thanks, Peter, and then just on your expectations for the level of 30-year mortgage rates over the near to intermediate term? Yeah Mortgage rates rallied in the third quarter, backed up a bit in recent weeks. So curious on your thoughts here. I know you've said publicly that you didn't necessarily expect them to break below 6%, but just curious on what your expectations are right now. Yeah, no, I think it's a really important point about the outlook for the mortgage market. If we had this call, for example, right at the end of the quarter when the ten-year was at three sixty or so, and the risk was that it was going lower, we would have had a lot of conversation about prepayment risk in the mortgage market because it was clearly starting to pick up, certainly with some of the more recent vintages. But now, the mortgage rate, given the backup of Treasury rates, the ten-year Treasury, close to four twenty-five as of yesterday. Primary mortgage rates are now above six fifty, approaching six seventy-five, depending on where you look. That's a really significant shift. Again, it's going to slow the supply of mortgages down, which really improves the technicals. Against the backdrop of a more accommodative Fed, growing demand for fixed income in general, and now, given the backup in mortgage rates, and it appears that the ten-year really is sort of well positioned at this four to four and a quarter range. It seems to us that the likely scenario is that the primary mortgage rate stays above six and a half for an extended period of time. So that's part of why we're so optimistic about the outlook for the mortgage market. Great. Thank you, Peter. That's all super helpful. Sure. Thank you, Crispin. Our next question comes from Rick Shane from JP Morgan. Please go ahead with your question. Thanks, everybody, for taking my question. Good morning. Look, you've laid out sort of strategically what the opportunity is, but, you know, we're basically twenty-two days into the quarter, ten years backed up forty basis points, spreads on the five ten spread has widened twenty basis points. The MOVE Index has gone from ninety-five to, like, one twenty-eight. It's a pretty challenging or a pretty volatile three weeks. How do you what are the first of all, how does that impact book value on an updated basis? But what opportunities and what risks should we be thinking about in the short term, given pretty dramatic moves? And again, I realize we're within the sort of norms, but it's a twenty-day move that drives that. Yeah. Bernie mentioned in the prepared remarks. Thanks for the question. Bernie mentioned in the prepared remarks that our book value as of the end of last week was down around 3.5%, given the backup in Treasury rates. We ended last quarter with a slightly positive duration gap of 0.2 years. So the backup in rates had a little bit of a negative impact on our book value. But as I mentioned, mortgage spreads moving back toward the middle of the range has been the other driver of that. What I think it shows is that we're in a higher volatility environment right now over the near term, and it's simply because of the election. One of the reasons why we ended the quarter, last quarter, with our leverage still very low at 7.2, was essentially retaining some capacity for this environment from a risk management perspective and from an opportunity perspective. Our unencumbered position, cash position at the end of last quarter was $6.2 billion, or 68% of our equity. That's one of the highest prints we've had. But we did anticipate that as we went into the election, the interest rate environment would become much more volatile, and that clearly has been the case, given the outlook of how close the election is. This backup in interest rates is related to that. I expect that it's going to remain volatile for the next several weeks or maybe even a month or so. But in the end, once you get through the election, I think the fundamental outlook for the mortgage market takes over and for fixed income in general, and that's why we're so optimistic. But you're right, we have to be a little defensive here for the next couple of weeks until we get through the election. Got it. No, sorry for missing the comments. I was clearly making another cup of coffee. I apologize. That's okay. No problem. It's worth repeating. Excellent. That's it for me. Thanks, guys. Our next question comes from Doug Harter from UBS. Please go ahead with your question. Hi, Doug. Thanks. Hi, Peter. Just on the last comment about, you know, kind of being defensive, you know, I guess, how are you thinking about, you know, kind of delta hedging, you know, you know, kind of reducing portfolio size or leverage, you know, kind of in the run-up to the election or in this kind of current volatility versus, you know, kind of having the flexibility of kind of letting leverage rise? Yeah. I think we were well positioned from a leverage perspective, so I don't anticipate us having to do anything on the leverage side. But I do anticipate, and we typically would do this in such an environment, you know, delta hedge some of the rate move. Our duration gap, for example, today is probably about point four years or something in that neighborhood, about a half year. I don't expect it to be much larger than that and may even come down over time. So we'll be a little bit more active on the delta hedging side. I don't anticipate us having to do anything on the leverage side. I expect this, again, to be a fairly short-lived period of volatility. Great. And then on the Treasury hedges, you know, clearly swap spreads have moved and widened and, you know, being in Treasuries was the better place to be. You know, how do you think about, you know, kind of where those where that spread can go and, you know, that does at some point, it makes sense to try to capture that difference and move into more, you know, SOFR-based hedges? I'll start with the latter part. It definitely does. And if you recall, over the last several quarters, we've actually talked more about increasing our swap-based hedges. But we did the opposite last quarter because of the way the market was trading. But you're right, over the long run, or longer run, I do expect us to shift back more toward swap-based hedges. But as Chris mentioned, right now, given the focus on the deficit, given the sort of response in the Treasury market to the election and how that may play out and what that may mean under either administration for the supply of Treasuries, we've sort of delayed that transition to back toward our more of our swap-based hedges. If you think, like, historically, we probably have, on average, operate with somewhere between 70%-80% of our hedges and swap-based hedges. Today, it's 60%, so there could be 10% or 20% shift in our hedge portfolio over time once we get stability in the rate market and stability in the swap spreads. But swap spreads, as you pointed out, they're very technical, very difficult to read. A lot goes into them. But over the long run, you're right, we will shift back more towards swap-based hedges at some point. Great. Appreciate it, Peter. Our next question comes from Trevor Cranston from JMP Securities. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, thanks. Good morning, Trevor. Morning. I think you mentioned in the prepared comments that, you know, as the yield curve starts to steepen with the Fed easing, you know, you'd expect to see some increased demand for MBS. Can you elaborate on that a little bit in terms of, you know, like how much curve steepness you typically need to see for some of that demand to come in, and kind of who the investor base that comes in as the yield curve becomes steeper? Thanks. Yeah. It's an unknown, but I do expect the demand to increase, and I expect the demand to really come from unlevered investors, not levered investors. That while there are some levered investors, they're not the significant share of the market as we see it going forward. Chris mentioned the bond fund inflows, and that's really one of the key drivers of that will be the shape of the yield curve. I mean, there's $6+ trillion in money market mutual funds that have been enjoying returns of over 5%. Those are obviously going away, and over time, fixed income, like a high-quality Agency current coupon with a yield today of 5.5% or so, will look really attractive. And I think that ultimately money will flow out of those funds and out of equity into fixed income, given the attractive yield opportunity. So it's something that's just going to occur over time. But the shape of the yield curve obviously will be important from a bank perspective in terms of the carry on mortgages, foreign demand, perhaps. We do expect and we thought we were going to get some resolution on the Basel Endgame. Certainly, the Fed indicated that they were moving toward resolution on that late in the third quarter. That seems to have been delayed, but that was heading in a very positive direction. So there will be some clarity over that, over the next quarter or so. And so I think that'll be a positive for the bond market as well. So those are the sources that we see occurring over time. Got it. Okay. Appreciate the comment. Thank you. Sure. Our next question comes from Eric Hagen from BTIG. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Following up on the leverage questions. Hold on one second. Sure. You guys are running less than eight times leverage, but, you know, like you said, mortgage spreads are still relatively wide. I mean, how much room do you feel like you have to raise leverage, and what's the right way to benchmark your leverage, and maybe the upper bound that you could target versus periods historically, where the shape of the curve has, you know, maybe been a little different, and your valuation also supports the ability to raise accretive capital right now? Yeah. There's a lot there, and it's difficult to give you any sort of hard quantification of the upper bound or the lower bound, because it's really driven by the specific environment that you're in. So the variables that matter a lot when you're thinking about setting your leverage, really it comes down to volatility, and it comes down to volatility of interest rates and the volatility of spreads. And when you're in a highly volatile spread environment, we are a spread business, and that is the biggest driver of our book value. So if we're in an environment like we were, this is why we specifically brought this up on this call, back a year or two ago, when mortgage spread range was really wide, you had to really be defensive in terms of your leverage position to give yourself sufficient capacity to absorb these very wide spread moves. As that range narrows, that obviously gives you more confidence to operate with higher leverage. That, as I've been trying to communicate, has been materializing over the last several quarters. The more we stay in the range, the more confidence you get in the range, gives you greater ability to operate with higher leverage. To the extent that mortgages are on the upper end of that range, and you're confident that range holds, that's a more of an ideal time to employ more leverage. When you get to the lower end of the range, we obviously are a little more hesitant to deploy capital at those levels. For example, in the third quarter, when we raised capital, at times, mortgages were in that range, in the middle of the range, and they were really attractive. When they got to the lower end of the range, we actually paused and didn't deploy capital as quickly. So it's an opportunistic sort of decision. But the point is, today, as we ended the quarter with 68% of our capital unencumbered, it does give us capacity to operate with higher leverage. Once we get confidence in the mortgage spread range, which is becoming, we're becoming increasingly confident in, and then once we get through this interest rate environment, obviously, we've had experiences with elections where interest rates have become very volatile. That's something that we're going to have to be disciplined with over the short run. That's really helpful. Hey, do you guys see a material difference in yield or carry within the coupon stack? And as you guys raise additional capital, where do you expect to potentially deploy that within the stack? Thank you. Yeah. I'll have Chris talk a little bit about where we see the opportunities. Yeah. So general, excuse me, generally speaking, production coupons offer the best long-run risk-adjusted returns. Of course, they have more prepayment risk, you know, but we think that's more than in the price. You know, higher coupon spreads are wide because they have to contend with much worse technicals, right? If banks were more involved in growing their securities holdings, the spread curve would likely be less upward sloping. Instead, you know, the market dynamic that's been in place for over a year now, as fixed income, you know, sentiment has improved, you know, bond fund inflows are generally directed to index coupons, which aren't being produced, whereas, you know, all the organic supply is in higher coupons. I think, you know, over time, as banks rotate out of lower yielding securities and into higher coupons and ultimately, you know, start growing their securities holdings, relative value relationships, you know, will likely shift, but it'll take time. It'll likely require Basel III clarity, as Peter mentioned, maybe a couple more Fed rate cuts. In the meantime, you know, we're likely to, you know, maintain and add, you know, higher coupons relative to the index, which, you know, we think offer the best, the best long-run returns. You know, that said, you know, there are sectors within lower coupons that can be compelling from, you know, a total return perspective and also provide diversification and liquidity benefits in certain environments. But generally speaking, you know, we see the, the best opportunities in production coupons. That's really helpful. Thank you, guys. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Stewart from Janney Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Peter, maybe you could elaborate on your view of the current prepayment environment and maybe specific to the servicing industry capacity, and how that affects near-term prepayment outlooks on current coupons? Sure. I'll let Chris address that. Yeah, sure. So, you know, the last two prepay reports, you know, were certainly the most interesting that we've had really, you know, in the post-COVID period, since we had a pretty sizable portion, you know, of the float in higher coupons at least exposed to, you know, 50+ basis point incentive to refinance. So in fairness, you know, as a percentage of the outstanding float, it was still very small at around 10%, but as a percent of the float originated since two thousand and twenty-two, it was a little over 30%, you know, when mortgage rates got down to around 6% back in September. We've since, you know, obviously sold off 40+ basis points in October. So, you know, the refi wave was again very short-lived. But you know, what we observed is that the response for a given incentive to refinance, you know, was definitely sharper than what we observed during the last, you know, mini refi wave, you know, around the start of the year, but still quite a bit slower than what we experienced during COVID. So in other words, for the same incentive for similar loans, peak speeds were still quite a bit lower than what we experienced during COVID. So you know, in fairness, you know, these sample sizes, you know, are too short-lived to draw any, you know, significant conclusions from. But you know, what we've observed so far is a less aggressive response than a couple of years ago. You know, the only other thing I'd say, you know, capacity clearly is not an issue in the system. We're not, certainly not betting against efficiency in the refi process longer run, but there are, you know, there are possibly, you know, some differences today that explain the weaker response. A lack of a media effect is one for sure. You know, and given the relatively flat curve, refi products like ARMs are less compelling to borrowers, and so there are explanations, you know, to the tamer response, but, you know, again, it's hard to draw, you know, long-run conclusions from such a short event. Okay. That's really helpful. Thank you for that and then a high-level question. You know, as we look at slide 24, we just look at the MBS spread sensitivity to a shock. Can you remind us, you know, first, how that's measured in terms of MBS spread? And maybe what the delta is between realizing that and that snapshot. I believe we're something like 12.6% appreciation for 25 basis points at six thirty, so maybe if you could just help, you know, put a point in the primary drivers between actual and that snapshot, that'd be helpful. Thanks. Yeah, it's one of the issues that I think maybe made this quarter a little bit confusing, because you really can't look at just a simple benchmark spread. Really, when we're doing that, we're running our entire portfolio and shocking each of our coupons and coming up with that sensitivity. The challenge for investors is, how do I replicate that in terms of estimating our book value performance? If you look, for example, at the current coupon spread as a benchmark, which I often refer to in terms of given indications of richness or cheapness, it can lead to misleading results. Like, for example, this last quarter, current coupon looked like it tightened a lot, and that's because we shifted down in coupon by almost a full coupon. So we went from a six at the beginning of the quarter to a five, and so there's a big drop in yield, not consistent with the economics of spread tightening. What you really have to do is you have to look at the performance of each coupon to a sort of hedge benchmark and come up with a weighted average approach that will lead you to a more correct conclusion. If you look at, for example, the performance of a six and the performance of a five last quarter, sixes actually were wider on the quarter by close to eight basis points, and fives were actually tighter on the quarter by a couple of basis points. So that was really the way you have to look at the performance. That's what we're doing when we do that sensitivity. You would have to look at our portfolio, look at it by coupon, look at the performance of each coupon to a benchmark hedge portfolio, whether it be swaps or Treasuries, and draw a conclusion from there. Great, thanks. I don't know if that- No, that's helpful. Yeah, no, it makes perfect sense to me. I mean, we were... You beat us by $0.15, so that's the way we do it. But I do get the question a lot, so I thought it was helpful to- Yes T o draw a high-level takeaway. Perfect. Our final question comes from Harsh Hemnani, from Green Street. Please go ahead with your question. Good morning, Harsh. Thank you. Maybe following up on that, prepayment speeds questions. The expected life CPR increased quite a bit. Can you help explain that increase against the backdrop of, you know, where you're expecting, call it, mortgage rates to trade in the 6.5% range? Is it just the sensitivity to the same refi incentive increasing? Any color there would be helpful. Yeah, the increase in our projected lifetime CPR was based on where prevailing interest rates were at the end of the quarter. So interest rates in the third quarter declined. Forward interest rates were also lower. That led to an acceleration in our expectation of prepayment speeds on our portfolio over the lifetime based on each particular coupon. So it's consistent with where forward rates are and forward mortgage rates are. Got it, okay. Obviously, that will change every quarter with interest rates. So, I don't know if that- Got it. Answers your. Yeah. Yep, that's helpful. Maybe if I can also ask, so, the weighted average coupon on just the MBS portfolio ticked down slightly a bit during the quarter. At the end of the quarter, I think it was consistent with the current coupon. Yeah. The current coupon, of course, has increased since then. Can we expect the trend of sort of moving towards higher coupons to continue for the next couple quarters? Yeah. Yeah, as Chris mentioned, well, a couple of things that Chris mentioned. One is that in the last quarter, we actually moved down a little bit in coupon. We actually increased our holdings. The most significant increase in our holdings was a 4.5% coupon. So that was one of the drivers of the decline in our average coupon. But as Chris mentioned, our inclination now is to move back up in coupon, given this rate environment. So I would expect some upward pressure on our average coupon to move up consistent with that portfolio reallocation. Got it. Thank you. Sure. Ladies and gentlemen, with that, we'll complete today's question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Peter Federico for closing, concluding remarks. Again, I appreciate everybody joining our call today. We're really pleased with our third quarter results, very encouraged by the outlook for the mortgage market, and we look forward to speaking to you all again at the end of the year. And with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll conclude today's conference call and presentation. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the AGNC Investment Corp. third quarter 2024 shareholder call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star and then one using a touchtone telephone. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Please note, today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Katie Turlington of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you all for joining AGNC Investment Corp's third quarter 2024 earnings call. Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. This conference call and corresponding slide presentation contains statements that, to the extent they are not recitations of historical fact, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All such forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Reform Act. Actual outcomes and results could differ materially from those forecasts due to the impact of many factors beyond the control of AGNC. All forward-looking statements included in this presentation are made only as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change without notice. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements are included in AGNC's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies are available on the SEC's website at sec.gov. We disclaim any obligation to update our forward-looking statements unless required by law. Participants on the call include Peter Federico, Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Bernie Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chris Kuehl, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, Aaron Pas, Senior Vice President, Non-Agency Portfolio Management, and Sean Reid, Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development. With that, I will turn the call over to Peter Federico. Good morning, and thank you for joining our third quarter earnings call. For the last several quarters, we have spoken about a promising and durable investment environment that we believed was unfolding for AGNC, an environment characterized by mortgage spreads that were materially wider than historical norms, declining interest rate volatility, and the emerging accommodative monetary policy stance by the Federal Reserve. In the third quarter, these positive trends became increasingly apparent, and as a result, investor optimism grew. Against this favorable fixed income investment backdrop, AGNC generated a very strong economic return of 9.3% in the third quarter, driven by solid book value growth and our compelling monthly dividend, which has now remained stable at $0.12 per common share for 55 consecutive months. At its September meeting, the Fed began the process of recalibrating monetary policy with an initial rate cut that was larger than many expected. More important than the magnitude of the rate cut itself, the move marked the end of a very challenging three-year period of unprecedented monetary policy restraint. In addition, the Fed also communicated its intention to lower short-term rates to a neutral level over time. Consistent with this view, the September Summary of Economic Projections showed the median federal funds rate declining by two hundred and fifty basis points by the end of twenty twenty-six. While the path to this neutral policy stance will undoubtedly depend on economic data, as Chairman Powell explicitly stated, "The direction of travel is now clear." This significant transition in monetary policy marked a positive development for AGNC and for fixed income markets, broadly speaking. In response to this improved monetary policy outlook, Treasury rates rallied across the yield curve, with short-term rates declining significantly more than long-term rates. To put the rate moves in perspective, the yield curve ended the quarter with a positive slope for the first time in two years. Agency MBS performance during the third quarter varied considerably by coupon and hedge composition. Our performance benefited from having a diversified mix of assets, as well as a meaningful share of longer-term Treasury-based hedges. From a macro perspective, there were a couple of important takeaways from the third quarter. First, the long-awaited Fed pivot occurred, and consistent with historical experience, the Fed is expected to return the federal funds rate to a neutral level over the next 12 to 24 months. Typically, in such periods of monetary policy accommodation, the yield curve steepens and the demand for high-quality fixed income instruments, like Agency MBS, grows. The other important takeaway from the quarter is that Agency MBS spreads remain in the same relatively narrow trading range that has now been in place for close to a year. This trading range compares very favorably to the highly volatile spread environment that existed while the Fed was aggressively tightening monetary policy. As a levered and hedged investor in Agency MBS, AGNC's return opportunities are most favorable when Agency MBS spreads to swap and Treasury rates are wide and stable, and when interest rates and monetary policy are less volatile. We anticipated that this type of environment would eventually emerge once the Fed transitioned to an accommodative monetary policy stance, which it did at the September meeting. With Agency MBS spreads trading in a relatively narrow range this year, it follows that our common stock net asset value would also be relatively stable. That has been the case, with our net asset value per common share increasing a modest 1.4% over the first nine months of the year. Much more significantly, however, our economic return per common share, which includes the dividends we paid, as well as the change in our net asset value, was 13.8% through the first nine months of the year. Similarly, our total stock return, with dividends reinvested, was 17.5% over the same period. This performance exemplifies AGNC's ability to generate very attractive returns in environments where spreads are wide and stable. Looking ahead, we believe the most likely scenario for Agency MBS spreads is that they remain in the current trading range. This view is predicated in part on our belief that the supply and demand dynamics for Agency MBS remain in reasonable balance. Given the recent modest decline in mortgage rates, it is possible that the supply of Agency MBS will increase somewhat over the intermediate term. On the demand side, however, accommodative monetary policy, a steeper yield curve, historically large money market mutual fund balances, and less onerous bank regulation indicate to us that the demand for high-quality fixed income assets is biased to increase as the Fed reduces short-term interest rates. While the path of financial markets is never perfectly smooth and periods of volatility are inevitable, the outlook for Agency MBS is decidedly better today than it was in 2022 and 2023, given the current economic outlook, the stance of the Fed, and our expectation that long-term interest rates and Agency MBS spreads will remain relatively stable. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Bernie Bell to discuss our financial results in greater detail. Thank you, Peter. For the third quarter, AGNC had total comprehensive income of $0.63 per share. Economic return on tangible common equity was 9.3% for the quarter, comprised of $0.36 of dividends declared per common share and an increase in our tangible net book value of $0.42 per share, or 5%. As of late last week, our tangible net book value per common share was down about 3% for October, or about 3.5% after deducting our monthly dividend accrual. Leverage decreased modestly for the quarter to 7.2 x tangible equity as of quarter end, from 7.4 x as of Q2. Additionally, we concluded the quarter with unencumbered cash and Agency MBS of $6.2 billion, or 68% of our tangible equity, which was up from $5.3 billion, or 65% of tangible equity as of June 30. The average projected life CPR for our portfolio at quarter end increased 4% to 13.2%, consistent with the decline in interest rates, while the average coupon in our portfolio was largely unchanged at just over 5% as of September 30. Actual CPRs for the quarter averaged 7.3%, up slightly from 7.1% for Q2. Net spread and dollar roll income declined by $0.10 to $0.43 per common share for the quarter, driven by a reduction in our net interest rate spread, which narrowed by approximately 50 basis points to just above 220 basis points for the quarter. About half of the decline in our net interest spread was a result of $6.5 billion of very low-cost pay-fixed swaps that matured during the quarter. We have no additional swaps scheduled to mature until the second quarter of next year. The other half of the decline was due to our decision to further reduce our swap-based hedges and increase our use of Treasury-based hedges, which are not captured in our reported net interest spread. Lastly, in the third quarter, we issued $781 million of common equity through our at-the-market offering program. The significant increase in ATM issuance was consistent with the substantial price-to-book premium of our common stock throughout the quarter and drove material book value accretion for the benefit of our common stockholders. In addition, the positive investment environment provided a favorable backdrop for the deployment of this new capital, and with that, I'll now turn the call over to Chris Kuehl to discuss the Agency mortgage market. Thanks, Bernie. Weaker economic data and increasingly dovish Fed rhetoric provided a constructive backdrop for risk assets and duration throughout the third quarter. The yield curve steepened dramatically, with two-year and ten-year Treasury yields declining one hundred and twelve basis points and sixty-two basis points, respectively. Both MBS and corporate credit indices outperformed Treasury benchmarks during the quarter. However, within MBS, performance was heavily influenced by coupon, hedge type, and tenor. Lower coupon MBS, which comprise the vast majority of the Bloomberg MBS Index, outperformed higher coupons in the third quarter, with 4.5% and lower coupons tightening ten to fifteen basis points, while 5% and higher coupons ranged from slightly tighter to modestly wider. The outperformance of lower coupon MBS was driven by favorable technicals, as fixed income bond fund inflows continued to increase at an average weekly pace year-to-date of $8.5 billion, roughly double the pace of last year. These funds are largely index-based, and as such, drove demand for lower coupon MBS. In contrast, the decline in primary mortgage rates, combined with the tail end of elevated seasonal housing activity, led to an increase in supply and relative underperformance of production coupon MBS. Notably, Agency MBS spread volatility has been considerably lower in 2024, with par coupon spreads to a blend of 5- and 10-year Treasury yields, trading in a range of 40 basis points. This compares favorably to 2023 and 2022, when par coupon spreads traded in a range of 75 and 108 basis points, respectively. During the third quarter, we added about $5 billion in Agency MBS, and as a result, our investment portfolio increased to $72.1 billion as of September thirtieth. In terms of portfolio composition, we added approximately $6 billion in pools during the quarter, most of which were in low pay-up categories, while our TBA position declined consistent with conventional rolls trading at relatively weak implied funding levels. Our Ginnie Mae TBA position in aggregate was largely unchanged as of September thirtieth, as valuations remained attractive and roll-implied financing continued to offer an advantage versus repo funding. Hedge positioning was also a material driver of performance during the third quarter, given the combination of yield curve steepening and swap spread tightening. As a result, MBS hedged with longer tenor U.S. Treasury-based instruments generated significantly better total returns. During the third quarter, we decreased our swap-based hedges and increased our allocation to Treasury-based hedges. Importantly, we also continued to increase our use of longer-term hedges, given the shift in monetary policy and our expectations for further yield curve steepening. Consistent with this shift towards longer-term hedges, our overall hedge ratio declined to 72%. We believe longer-term Treasury hedges give us additional protection against the challenges posed by the growing U.S. government debt and ongoing budget deficits. I'll now turn the call over to Aaron to discuss the Non-Agency markets. Thank you, Chris. In early August, as market expectations shifted toward faster rate cuts, credit spreads initially widened. By the end of the quarter, however, broad-based risk-on sentiment pushed macro markets higher. As a result, credit spreads generally ended the quarter unchanged to somewhat tighter. In Q3, the synthetic investment-grade index was close to unchanged, while the high yield index tightened by about fifteen basis points. On the cash bond side, the Bloomberg IG Index narrowed by five basis points and subsequent to quarter end, has tightened about eight basis points. Last week, this index closed through the tightest levels seen during the COVID QE period, and reaching the tightest valuations in the post-Great Financial Crisis era. As we have mentioned before, credit fundamentals continue to show a divided consumer base. Lower-income households continue to face pressure, but we've yet to see significant signs of distress. Our Non-Agency securities portfolio ended the quarter at $890 million, down roughly 5% from the previous quarter, with the composition of our holdings mostly unchanged. The reduction in the portfolio was due to our participation in GSE tender offers for credit risk transfer securities. Lastly, the funding environment for Non-Agency securities remains stable and historically attractive. With that, I'll hand the call back over to Peter. Thank you, Aaron. With that, we'll now open the call up to your questions. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star and then one on your touchtone telephones. If you are using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Once again, that is star and then one to join the question queue. At this time, we'll pause momentarily to assemble the roster. Our first question today comes from Bose George from KBW. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, everyone, good morning. Just wanted to follow up first on the, you know, the comments you made on the changes to your hedges. So does this, you know, position you better for curve steepening? Is that the, sort of the driver? Yeah, Bose, that's exactly right. It's a great question. And, you know, Chris mentioned this in his prepared remarks, and we've talked about this now for several quarters, but you really see the impact of it this quarter with our hedge ratio coming down to 72% from 98% the last quarter. And as Chris mentioned, we've systematically shifted our hedges more toward the longer part of the yield curve. In fact, if you think about it from a duration perspective, almost 80% of our hedges come from hedges that are seven years and longer. So we're concentrating our hedge book to have longer-dated instruments, with the expectation that the yield curve will steepen over time, and that's consistent with the monetary policy environment that we're in. Also, from our perspective, makes sense for us now to operate with a hedge ratio less than 100%, so that we over time will gain some benefit of having some of our debt repricing to the new Fed funds rate. Oh, okay, great. Thanks. And then actually on the core earnings, you know, obviously makes sense with as the swaps roll off- Yeah. You know, the direction of that. You know, just over time, I mean, is the way to think about it is your core earnings should sort of essentially converge with your economic return. So, you know, if we think you can generate a seventeen ROE, that's kind of where core earnings end up? That's exactly right. And there's a lot of factors that went into the decline in our net spread and dollar roll income this last quarter. Bernie mentioned, you know, we had $6.5 billion worth of swaps mature this quarter. We actually don't have any swaps maturing over the next two quarters. But more than that, we took some actions to actually reduce our swap book further. Because we did favor Treasury-based hedges, they actually were a better performing hedge, really, for the last several quarters, given the tightening in swap spreads. So we wanted to have more Treasury-based hedges, and that has a direct impact on our net spread and dollar roll income because it doesn't include those hedges. It only includes our Treasury-based hedges. In fact, for example, if you included the carry on our Treasury position, it would probably be somewhere in the neighborhood of about $0.08 of carry on our Treasury position right now that is not captured in that net spread and dollar roll income. So, from that perspective, it's not a significant driver. In fact, it's not a driver at all of our dividend policy. If you think about our net spread and dollar roll income has been well over our dividend now for a couple years, and it hasn't impacted our dividend policy. It's a reflection of the current period earnings. When you take that net spread and dollar roll income and even express that on our equity, it translates to a return on equity of somewhere between 19% and 20%. That's still above the long run economics, as you point out. Today, the economics of new mortgages are in the 16% to really 18% range right now. I would expect our net spread and dollar roll income on our margin to compress consistent with that. And the speed and pace of growth of our portfolio also has an impact on that compression. For example, we have raised a lot of capital in the last two quarters, and as Chris has mentioned, we've purchased over the last two quarters about $8 billion worth of mortgages. So we've grown our mortgage portfolio at a pace of around 12.5%, and we're bringing those on at those current spreads, call it between 150 and 200 basis points. So that in and of itself is driving some of that compression. It's not a number, our net interest margin, nor our net spread and dollar roll income. Those are current period numbers. They're not numbers that affect our dividend policy. We're looking at the long run economics of our portfolio, and we think it still remains very well aligned. Great. That's helpful. Thanks. Sure. Thank you, Bose. Our next question comes from Crispin Love from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead with your question. Thanks, and good morning, everyone. Peter, just following up on that last question, just based on your comments and expectations of Agency spreads remaining in the current trading range, can you discuss the return expectations in Agency MBS, and then how that compares to your book value yield right now, which is around the mid-teens, about 17% or so? I think you mentioned a normalized level of 16%-18%. So do you feel good about the current dividend level here, that you do have some near-term benefits with the hedges before getting to that 16%-18% level? Yeah, we do feel good about our alignment with our dividend policy and the economics of our portfolio. And there's a couple really important takeaways. I mentioned this in my prepared remarks, but the fact that mortgages continue to stay in this same narrower range is a really positive development just overall. I mean, that's from our perspective, mortgages being at wide levels and stable levels allow us to generate the really attractive earnings like we've experienced so far for the first three quarters. And importantly, the spread volatility has come down. Chris mentioned this. You think about that spread range this year, for example, mortgages have only traded in a forty basis point range. Compare that to two years ago, it was over a hundred basis point range. That obviously has a lot of impact on our risk management position and how we position the portfolio. It does appear to us that mortgages are kind of comfortable in this range, and and if you look back to the end of the quarter to now, mortgages have actually moved back toward the middle of the range. I often refer to the current coupon spread to the five and ten years as just a benchmark. That now is back around close to a hundred and fifty basis points, which is sort of right in the middle of the hundred and forty to hundred and sixty basis point range. Importantly, mortgages current coupon, anyhow, to a blend of swap hedges, is somewhere in the hundred and eighty-five basis point range now. So if we're going to use, like we always do, even though we have about 40% of our hedges in Treasuries now, we're always going to use a mix of swaps and Treasuries as hedges. You can think about that spread as being somewhere average, you know, about 170-175 basis points. That translates to really attractive ROEs. That's our base case expectation, is they stay in this range. Great. Thanks, Peter. And then just on your expectations for the level of thirty-year mortgage rates over the near to intermediate term. Yeah. Mortgage rates rallied in the third quarter, backed up a bit in recent weeks. So curious on your thoughts here. I know you've said publicly that you didn't necessarily expect them to break below 6%, but just curious on what your expectations are right now. Yeah, no, I think it's a really important point about the outlook for the mortgage market. If we had this call, for example, right at the end of the quarter when the 10-year was at 3.60 or so, and the risk was that it was going lower, we would have had a lot of conversation about prepayment risk in the mortgage market because it was clearly starting to pick up, certainly with some of the more recent vintages. But now the mortgage rate, given the backup of Treasury rates, the 10-year Treasury, close to 4.25 as of yesterday. Primary mortgage rates are now above 6.50, approaching 6.75, depending on where you look. That's a really significant shift. Again, it's going to slow the supply of mortgages down, which really improves the technicals. Against the backdrop of a more accommodative Fed, growing demand for fixed income in general, and now, given the backup in mortgage rates, and it appears that the ten-year really is sort of well positioned at this four to four and a quarter range. It seems to us that the most likely scenario is that the primary mortgage rate stays above six and a half for an extended period of time. So that's part of why we're so optimistic about the outlook for the mortgage market. Great. Thank you, Peter. That's all super helpful. Sure. Thank you, Crispin. Our next question comes from Rick Shane from JP Morgan. Please go ahead with your question. Thanks, everybody, for taking my question. Good morning. Look, you've laid out sort of strategically what the opportunity is, but, you know, we're basically 22 days into the quarter, 10-year backed up 40 basis points, spreads on the 5-10 spread has widened 20 basis points. The MOVE Index has gone from 95 to, like, 128. It's a pretty challenging or a pretty volatile three weeks. What are the first of all, how does that impact book value on an updated basis? But what opportunities and what risks should we be thinking about in the short term, given pretty dramatic moves? And again, I realize we're within the sort of norms, but it's a 20-day move that drives that. Yeah. Bernie mentioned in the prepared remarks. Thanks for the question. Bernie mentioned in the prepared remarks that our book value as of the end of last week was down around 3.5%, given the backup in Treasury rates. We ended last quarter with a slightly positive duration gap of 0.2 years. So the backup in rates had a little bit of a negative impact on our book value. But as I mentioned, mortgage spreads moving back toward the middle of the range has been the other driver of that. What I think it shows is that we're in a higher volatility environment right now over the near term, and it's simply because of the election. One of the reasons why we ended the quarter last quarter with our leverage still very low at 7.2 was essentially retaining some capacity for this environment from a risk management perspective and from an opportunity perspective. Our unencumbered position, cash position at the end of last quarter was $6.2 billion, or 68% of our equity. That's one of the highest prints we've had. But we did anticipate that as we went into the election, the interest rate environment would become much more volatile, and that clearly has been the case, given the outlook of how close the election is. This backup in interest rates is related to that. I expect that it's going to remain volatile for the next several weeks or maybe even a month or so. But in the end, once you get through the election, I think the fundamental outlook for the mortgage market takes over and for fixed income in general, and that's why we're so optimistic. But you're right, we have to be a little defensive here for the next couple of weeks until we get through the election. Got it. And sorry for missing the comments. I was clearly making another cup of coffee. I apologize. That's okay. No problem. It's worth repeating. Excellent. That's it for me. Thanks, guys. Our next question comes from Doug Harter from UBS. Please go ahead with your question. Hi, Doug. Thanks. Hi, Peter. Just on the last comment about, you know, kind of being defensive, you know, I guess, how are you thinking about, you know, kind of delta hedging, you know, kind of reducing portfolio size or leverage, you know, kind of in the run-up to the election or in this kind of current volatility versus, you know, kind of having the flexibility of kind of letting leverage rise? Yeah. I think we were well positioned from a leverage perspective, so I don't anticipate us having to do anything on the leverage side. But I do anticipate, and we typically would do this in such an environment, is, you know, delta hedge some of the rate move. Our duration gap, for example, today is probably about point four years or something in that neighborhood, about a half year. I don't expect it to be much larger than that and may even come down over time. So we'll be a little bit more active on the delta hedging side. I don't anticipate us having to do anything on the, on the leverage side. I expect this, again, to be a fairly short-lived period of volatility. Great. And then, on the Treasury hedges, you know, clearly swap spreads have moved and widened and, you know, being in Treasuries was the better place to be. You know, how do you think about, you know, kind of where that spread can go and, you know, does at some point it makes sense to try to capture that difference and move into more, you know, SOFR-based hedges? I'll start with the latter part. It definitely does. And if you recall, over the last several quarters, we've actually talked more about increasing our swap-based hedges. But we did the opposite last quarter because of the way the market was trading. But you're right, over the long run or longer run, I do expect us to shift back more toward swap-based hedges. But as Chris mentioned, right now, given the focus on the deficit, given the sort of response in the Treasury market to the election and how that may play out and what that may mean under either administration for the supply of Treasuries, we've sort of delayed that transition to back toward more of our swap-based hedges. If you think, like, historically, we probably have, on average, operate with somewhere between 70%-80% of our hedges and swap-based hedges. Today, it's 60%, so there could be 10% or 20% shift in our hedge portfolio over time once we get stability in the, in the rate market and stability in the, in the swap spreads. But swap spreads, as you pointed out, they're very technical, very difficult to read. A lot goes into them, but over the long run, you're right, we will shift back more towards swap-based hedges at some point. Great. Appreciate it, Peter. Our next question comes from Trevor Cranston from JMP Securities. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, thanks, Good morning, Trevor. Morning. I think you mentioned in the prepared comments that, you know, as the yield curve starts to steepen with the Fed easing, you know, you'd expect to see some increased demand for MBS. Can you elaborate on that a little bit in terms of, you know, like how much curve steepness you'd typically need to see for some of that demand to come in and kind of who the investor base that comes in as the yield curve becomes steeper? Thanks. Yeah. It's an unknown, but I do expect the demand to increase, and I expect the demand to really come from unlevered investors, not levered investors. That while there are some levered investors, they're not the significant share of the market as we see it going forward. Chris mentioned the bond fund inflows, and that's really one of the key drivers of that will be the shape of the yield curve. I mean, there's six plus trillion dollars in money market mutual funds that have been enjoying returns of over 5%. Those are obviously going away, and over time, fixed income, like a high-quality agency, current coupon with a yield today of 5.5% or so, will look really attractive. And I think that ultimately, money will flow out of those funds and out of equity into fixed income, given the attractive yield opportunity. So it's something that's just gonna occur over time. But the shape of the yield curve obviously will be important from a bank perspective in terms of the carry on mortgages, foreign demand, perhaps. We do expect and we thought we were gonna get some resolution on the Basel Endgame. Certainly, the Fed indicated that they were moving toward resolution on that late in the third quarter. That seems to have been delayed, but that was heading in a very positive direction. So there will be some clarity over that over the next quarter or so. And so I think that'll be a positive for the bond market as well. Those are the sources that we see occurring over time. Got it. Okay, appreciate the comment. Thank you. Sure. Our next question comes from Eric Hagen from BTIG. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Following up on the leverage questions. Hold on one second. Sure. you guys are running less than eight times leverage, but, you know, like you said, mortgage spreads are still relatively wide. I mean, how much room do you feel like you have to raise leverage, and what's the right way to benchmark your leverage? And maybe the upper bound that you could target versus periods historically, where the shape of the curve has, you know, maybe been a little different, and your valuation also supports the ability to raise accretive capital right now. Yeah, there's a lot there, and it's difficult to give you any sort of hard quantification of the upper bound or lower bound, because it's really driven by the specific environment that you're in. So the variables that matter a lot when you're thinking about setting your leverage, really it comes down to volatility, and it comes down to volatility of interest rates and the volatility of spreads. And then when you're in a highly volatile spread environment, we are a spread business, and that is the biggest driver of our book value. So if we're in an environment like we were, this is why we specifically brought this up on this call, back a year or two ago, when mortgage spread range was really wide, you had to really be defensive in terms of your leverage position to give yourself sufficient capacity to absorb these very wide spread moves. As that range narrows, that obviously gives you more confidence to operate with higher leverage. That, as I've been trying to communicate, has been materializing over the last several quarters. The more we stay in the range, the more confidence you get in the range, gives you greater ability to operate with higher leverage. To the extent that mortgages are on the upper end of that range, and you're confident that range holds, that's a more of an ideal time to employ more leverage. When you get to the lower end of the range, we obviously are a little more hesitant to deploy capital at those levels. For example, in the third quarter, when we raised capital, at times, mortgages were in that range, in the middle of the range, and they were really attractive. When they got to the lower end of the range, we actually paused and didn't deploy capital as quickly, so it's an opportunistic sort of decision, but the point is, today, as we ended the quarter with 68% of our capital unencumbered, it does give us capacity to operate with higher leverage. Once we get confidence in the mortgage spread range, which is, we're becoming increasingly confident in, and then once we get through this interest rate environment, obviously we've had experiences with elections where interest rates have become very volatile. That's something that we're going to have to be disciplined with over the short run. That's really helpful. Hey, do you guys see a material difference in yield or carry within the coupon stack? And as you guys raise additional capital, where do you expect to potentially deploy that within this, within the stack? Thank you. Yeah, I'll have Chris talk a little bit about where we see the opportunities. Generally speaking, production coupons offer the best long-run risk-adjusted returns. Of course, they have more prepayment risk, you know, but we think that's more than in the price. You know, higher coupon spreads are wide because they have to contend with much worse technicals, right? If banks were more involved in growing their securities holdings, the spread curve would likely be less upward sloping. Instead, you know, the market dynamic that's been in place for over a year now, as fixed income, you know, sentiment has improved, you know, bond fund inflows are generally directed to index coupons, which aren't being produced, whereas, you know, all the organic supply is in higher coupons. I think, you know, over time, as banks rotate out of lower yielding securities and into higher coupons and ultimately, you know, start growing their securities holdings, relative value relationships, you know, will likely shift, but it'll take time. It'll likely require Basel III clarity, as Peter mentioned, maybe a couple more Fed rate cuts. In the meantime, you know, we're likely to, you know, maintain and add, you know, higher coupons relative to the index, which, you know, we think offer the best the best long-run returns. You know, that said, you know, there are sectors within lower coupons that can be compelling from, you know, a total return perspective and also provide diversification and liquidity benefits in certain environments. But generally speaking, you know, we see the best opportunities in production coupons. That's really helpful. Thank you, guys. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Stewart from Janney Montgomery. Please go ahead with your question. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Peter, maybe you could elaborate on your view of the current prepayment environment and maybe specific to the servicing industry capacity, and how that affects near-term prepayment outlooks on current coupons? Sure. I'll let Chris address that. Yeah, sure. So, you know, the last two prepay reports, you know, were certainly the most interesting that we've had, really, you know, in the post-COVID period, since we had a pretty sizable portion, you know, of the float in higher coupons at least exposed to, you know, 50+ basis point incentive to refinance. So in fairness, you know, as a percentage of the outstanding float, it was still very small at around 10%, but as a percent of the float originated since 2022, it was a little over 30%, you know, when mortgage rates got down to around 6% back in September. We've since, you know, obviously sold off 40+ basis points in October. So, you know, the refi wave was again very short-lived. But, you know, what we observed is that the response for a given incentive to refinance, you know, was definitely sharper than what we observed during the last, you know, mini refi wave, you know, around the start of the year, but still quite a bit slower than what we experienced during COVID. So in other words, for the same incentive for similar loans, peak speeds were still quite a bit lower than what we experienced during COVID. So, you know, in fairness, you know, these sample sizes, you know, are too short-lived to draw any, you know, significant conclusions from. But, you know, what we've observed so far is a less aggressive response than a couple of years ago. You know, the only other thing I'd say, you know, capacity clearly is not an issue in the system. We're not, certainly not betting against efficiency in the refi process longer run, but there are, you know, possibly some differences today that explain the weaker response. A lack of a media effect is one for sure. You know, and given the relatively flat curve, refi products like ARMs are less compelling to borrowers. And so there are explanations, you know, to the market response. But, you know, again, it's hard to draw, you know, long-run conclusions from such a short event. Okay. That's really helpful. Thank you for that. And then a high-level question. You know, as we look at slide 24, we just look at the MBS spread sensitivity to a shock. Can you remind us, you know, first, how that's measured in terms of the MBS spread? And maybe what the delta is between realizing that and that snapshot. I believe we're something like 12.6% appreciation for 25 basis points at 6.30. So maybe if you could just help, you know, put a point in the primary drivers between actual and that snapshot. That'd be helpful. Thanks. Yeah, it's one of the issues that I think maybe, maybe made this quarter a little bit confusing, because you really can't look at just a simple benchmark spread. Really, when we're doing that, we're running our entire portfolio and shocking each of our coupons and coming up with that sensitivity. The challenge for investors is how do I replicate that in terms of estimating our book value performance? If you look, for example, at the current coupon spread as a benchmark, which I often refer to in terms of giving indications of richness or cheapness, it can lead to misleading results. Like, for example, this last quarter, current coupon looked like it tightened a lot, and that's because we shifted down in coupon by almost a full coupon. So we went from a six at the beginning of the quarter to a five, and so there's a big drop in yield, not consistent with the economics of spread tightening. What you really have to do is look at the performance of each coupon to a sort of hedged benchmark. and come up with a weighted average approach, that will lead you to a more correct conclusion. If you look at, for example, the performance of a six and the performance of a five last quarter, sixes actually were wider on the quarter by close to eight basis points, and fives were actually tighter on the quarter by a couple basis points. So that was really the way you have to look at the performance. That's what we're doing when we do that sensitivity. You would have to look at our portfolio, look at it by coupon, look at the performance of each coupon to a benchmark hedge portfolio, whether it be swaps or Treasuries, and draw a conclusion from there. Great. I don't know if that- Thanks. I don't know if that- No, that's helpful. Yeah, no, it makes perfect sense to me. I mean, we, you beat us by $0.15, so, that's the way we do it. But I do get the question a lot, so I thought it was helpful to- Yes T o draw a high-level takeaway. Perfect. Our final question comes from Harsh Hemnani from Green Street. Please go ahead with your question. Good morning, Harsh. Thank you. Maybe following up on that, prepayment speeds questions, the expected life CPR increased quite a bit. Can you help explain that increase against the backdrop of, you know, where you're expecting, call it, mortgage rates to trade in the 6.5% range? Is it just the sensitivity to the same refi incentive increasing? Any color there would be helpful. Yeah, the increase in our projected lifetime CPR was based on where prevailing interest rates were at the end of the quarter. So interest rates in the third quarter declined. Forward interest rates were also lower. That led to an acceleration in our expectation of prepayment speeds on our portfolio over the lifetime based on each particular coupon. So it's consistent with where forward rates are and forward mortgage rates are. Got it. Okay. Okay. Obviously, that will change every quarter with interest rates. So, I don't know if that- Got it. Yeah. Yep, that's helpful. Maybe if I can also ask, so, the weighted average coupon on just the MBS portfolio ticked down slightly a bit during the quarter. At the end of the quarter, I think it was consistent with the current coupon. Yeah. The current coupon, of course, has increased since then. Can we expect the trend of sort of moving towards higher coupons to continue for the next couple quarters? Yeah. As Chris mentioned, well, a couple of things that Chris mentioned. One is that in the last quarter, we actually moved down a little bit in coupon. We actually increased our holdings. The most significant increase in our holdings was a 4.5% coupon. So that was one of the drivers of the decline in our average coupon. But as Chris mentioned, our inclination now is to move back up in coupon, given this rate environment, so I would expect some upward pressure on our average coupon to move up consistent with that portfolio reallocation. Got it. Thank you. Sure. Ladies and gentlemen, with that, we'll complete today's question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Peter Federico for concluding remarks. Again, I appreciate everybody joining our call today. We're really pleased with our third quarter results. Very, encouraged by the outlook for the mortgage market, and we look forward to speaking to you all again at the end of the year. With that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll conclude today's conference call and presentation. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.