Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Amkor Technology second quarter 2024 earnings conference call. My name is Diego, and I'll be your conference facilitator today. Please note we are having some system issues with our webcast and slide technology, so if you're connected via the webcast, you may not see the slide presentation, but you will hear the audio of this webcast or via the webcast link. A reminder, at this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After speakers' remarks, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Jennifer Jue, Head of Investor Relations. Ms. Jue, please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us for Amkor's second quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Joining me today are Giel Rutten, our Chief Executive Officer, and Megan Faust, our Chief Financial Officer. Our earnings press release was filed with the SEC this afternoon and is available on the investor relations page of our website, along with the presentation slides that accompany today's call. During this presentation, we will use non-GAAP financial measures, and you can find the reconciliation to the U.S. GAAP equivalent on our website. We will make forward-looking statements about our expectations for Amkor's future performance based on the environment as we currently see it. Of course, actual results could differ. Please refer to our press release and SEC filings for information on risk factors, uncertainties, and exceptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from these expectations. Please note that the financial results discussed today are preliminary, and final data will be included in our Form 10-Q. Now I'll turn the call over to Giel. Thank you, Jennifer. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining the call today. Amkor delivered second quarter performance in line with expectations, with revenue of $1.46 billion and EPS of $0.27. Total revenue increased 7% sequentially, driven by demand for advanced packaging, notably for premium-tier smartphones and 2.5D technology for AI solutions. During the quarter, we maintained focus on our strategic pillars to elevate our leadership position. We successfully brought online additional capacity for 2.5D technology in Korea and qualified advanced SiP and memory technology in Vietnam to support production ramps in the third quarter. Additionally, we are excited that we have reached a significant milestone in establishing a U.S. manufacturing presence for advanced packaging. We aligned on a non-binding preliminary memorandum of terms with the U.S. Department of Commerce for up to $400 million in grants under the CHIPS and Science Act. These funds will support building a new facility in Arizona, enabling advanced packaging and test for high-performance computing, AI, communications, and automotive markets. We look forward to being part of a strong ecosystem of front-end fabs, IDMs, and suppliers in establishing a resilient U.S. semiconductor supply chain. Now, let me review the current dynamics in each of our end markets. Revenue in the communications end market increased 10% sequentially. Within the iOS ecosystem, we experienced a larger than seasonal increase, driven by builds for the full launch of premium-tier smartphones. Revenue within the Android supply chain declined slightly sequentially, but still showed a strong 20% year-on-year growth. Our advanced packaging technology supports a wide range of applications and functionality throughout the phone. With our advanced SiP technologies for heterogeneous integration, together with our proprietary Flip Chip Package -on -Package technology, we support the full range of applications from RF and camera to the latest AI-enabled HPC processors that require high speed and high- density interconnect with fine pitch bonding. Revenue from our automotive and industrial end market was down 2% sequentially. Recovery in this market is taking longer than anticipated due to weak demand and ongoing inventory corrections. Despite these near-term dynamics, we believe the long-term drivers for growth remain intact. Semiconductor content per car is expected to continue to increase, driven by the proliferation of ADAS, electrification, infotainment, and telematics, all requiring advanced packaging technology. Amkor is the leading automotive OSAT and has multiple decades of experience meeting the stringent requirements of the automotive industry. With a broad portfolio of advanced and mainstream technologies, an established large-scale manufacturing base in critical regions like Europe and Japan, and trusted relationships with key customers in the automotive supply chain, Amkor is well positioned to support the secular growth in this market when it exits the current cycle. Revenue from the computing end market increased 20% sequentially, driven by strength in AI devices and several new product introductions for ARM-based PCs. We executed on our planned expansion for 2.5D capacity for AI devices, more than tripling our capacity versus second quarter of 2023. In the third quarter, we expect constraints and high-bandwidth memory supply to limit revenue growth. Amkor is leading the OSAT supply chain with the deployment of 2.5D technology. With the robust demand and additional capacity, we now expect the full year 2.5D revenue to quadruple versus 2023 levels. We continue to partner with multiple customers on next-generation technology, utilizing organic interposers, and expect those solutions to be brought to market in the first half of 2025. Revenue from the consumer end market decreased 6% sequentially, driven by the wind down of legacy IoT devices ahead of the expected ramp-up of next-generation products. Traditional consumer product demand has been muted, but the high-volume production ramp of a new wearable product utilizing advanced SiP technology is expected to start in the third quarter. Consumer IoT devices require miniaturization with increasing levels of integration. Our advanced SiP technology for heterogeneous integration positions us well to meet these requirements, and our new Vietnam facility enables us to continue to drive manufacturing scale and innovation. During the second quarter, our manufacturing organization had to manage multiple challenges. On one hand, several factories still showed low utilization, where focus was on cost control while maintaining high-quality standards. On the other hand, we executed the capacity ramp for 2.5D technology in Korea, qualified advanced SiP and memory technology in Vietnam, and prepared for the steep seasonal ramp in the third quarter. Additionally, the team further progressed with our advanced packaging and test facility in Arizona by advancing factory design and construction planning, and working with customers to develop the technology roadmap and capacity loading scenarios. During the second half of the year, cost and quality, together with managing a steep seasonal ramp, will remain top priorities. Now let me turn to our third quarter outlook. Considering current market conditions, we expect third quarter revenue of $1.835 billion at the midpoint of guidance. This represents sequential growth of 26%, driven by advanced packaging in support of the seasonal launch of premium-tier smartphones, the ramp of a new consumer wearable device, and continued strong demand in high-performance computing and ARM-based PCs. The slower-than-expected recovery in the automotive and industrial markets, together with the continued weak demand in traditional data centers, has dampened anticipated growth in the third quarter. Looking forward, we remain confident that the secular growth drivers for the industry remain in place. With our strong technology leadership in advanced packaging, a uniquely diversified global footprint, and partnerships with lead customers, we are well positioned to accelerate while exiting this cycle. With that, I will now turn the call over to Megan to provide more detailed financial information. Thank you, Giel, and good afternoon, everyone. Amkor delivered second quarter revenue of $1.46 billion. This was in line with guidance and represents a 7% sequential increase, driven by strength in advanced SiP and 2.5D technology. Second quarter gross profit was $212 million, and gross margin was 14.5%. While gross margin declined modestly from Q1 due to higher material content, gross profit dollars expanded 5%. Operating expenses for the quarter came in lower than expected, at $131 million. We expect Q2 to be the peak for operating expenses in 2024 due to preparation costs for our factory in Vietnam. We are on track to begin production in Vietnam in Q3, and we expect a portion of the costs to move to cost of goods sold when production begins. Operating income was $82 million, and operating income margin was 5.6%. Net income for the second quarter was $67 million, resulting in EPS of $0.27. Second quarter EBITDA was $247 million, and EBITDA margin was 16.9%. Our balance sheet remains strong. We ended the quarter with $1.5 billion of cash and short-term investments, and total liquidity of $2.2 billion. Our total debt as of the end of the quarter is $1.1 billion, and our debt-to-EBITDA ratio is 1x. Moving on to our third quarter outlook, we expect Q3 revenue of around $1.835 billion, representing a significant sequential increase of 26%. Our Q3 increase is primarily driven by advanced SiP products, supporting the fall launch of premium tier smartphones, as well as a next generation consumer wearable product. While we have expanded our capacity for 2.5D technology supporting AI devices, high-bandwidth memory constraints may limit sequential revenue growth. Given the soft demand and ongoing inventory corrections in the automotive and industrial market, we anticipate this end market may stay fairly flat compared to Q2. We expect gross margin to be between 14% and 16%. We are anticipating a higher than seasonal material content due to a product mix concentrated in advanced SiP. While this does constrain gross margin, absolute profitability will expand at a much higher growth rate than revenue. We expect Q3 operating expenses of around $125 million. We expect our full year effective tax rate to be around 18%. Third quarter net income is expected to be between $105 million and $140 million, resulting in EPS of $0.42 to $0.56. This represents more than an 80% increase in profitability compared to Q2. Our CapEx forecast for the year remains at $750 million. Our investments are primarily focused on increasing advanced co-packaging capacity for 2.5D and advanced SiP, as well as expanding select manufacturing facilities. Last week, Amkor signed a non-binding preliminary memorandum of terms with the U.S. Department of Commerce to receive up to $400 million in direct funding as a part of the CHIPS and Science Act. We are proud to be the leading advanced packaging and test OSAT headquartered in the U.S., and this milestone underscores our commitment to ensuring U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, security, and innovation. In closing, Amkor continues to execute on our three strategic pillars. First, technology leadership by providing expanded capacity to support growing demand for 2.5D, enabling AI. Second, expanding our broad geographic footprint by hitting a significant milestone with our U.S. manufacturing plans and signing a preliminary memorandum of terms for CHIPS funding. Third, our focus on industry megatrends. We believe that the secular growth drivers for the industry remain in place, and that our partnerships with leading semiconductor companies will drive growth as we exit the cycle. With that, we will now open the call up for your questions. Operator? Thank you, and we will now conduct our question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate that your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we pull for questions. Our first question comes from Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson. Please state your question. Yes, good afternoon. Thank you for letting me ask a few questions. Megan, first question, on the model itself. When you look at the margin guidance versus previous expectations for, you know, in incremental gross margins as you ramped up revenue, I'm curious, how big of an impact is it, moving from the operating expense line to the gross margin line of this new facility? What is the relative kind of quarter-to-quarter impact of that? Sure. Hi, Tom. With respect to the Vietnam production facility going online, that movement from operating expenses, the order of magnitude isn't going to be that much more than what you're seeing in our guide between Q2 and Q3 going down. So that's less than $10 million. That is not, you know, the biggest impact to the Q3 margin guidance. Okay, so when you look at the Q3 margin guidance, then what is the, the biggest impact that's kind of counteracting the, just the revenue growth, incremental margin? Yeah. So really, what's happening with respect to our Q3 profitability is it's a function of utilization as it relates to certain products and product mix. So while we are anticipating an increase in our utilization in Q3, probably in the low 70s, the way that that's spreading amongst our factories is very dynamic. We have high utilization in factories such as Korea that are supporting advanced SiP, while others are much lower than expected and as what we had estimated previously, and that's really due to some ongoing lower demand in our traditional consumer, traditional data center, and as we had mentioned in our prepared remarks, in the automotive and industrial. So with respect to those dynamics, we are gonna see a peak seasonal material content in Q3, so that's the biggest driver that will constrain flow through. That is just a function of demand and product mix, it's not a structural cost. So that's where your first question about the Vietnam cost, it's not structural. In fact, the manufacturing costs estimated for Q3, which we characterize as labor, depreciation, and OCOGs, that excludes materials, those are only gonna increase in the mid-single digits as compared to the 26% increase in revenue. Great. Okay, now I appreciate all the extra color on the margins. And then, Giel, when you look at the PC and server market, you know, you talked about how in some of the new PCs were getting more active, but yet the servers are still pretty weak. Is that different than normal seasonality? Is there seasonality there, or is it really just a cyclical impact that you see in the PC and servers? Yes, Tom, let me try to give a little bit of color there. So first of all, we see some initial recovery in the general PC market, where we see specific growth for Amkor is in the ARM-based PCs, and they were ramping up starting Q1, and that goes into Q4 of this year. The significant ramps, and that goes across multiple customers here. So it's the general PC market gradually recovering, and very specifically, ARM-based PCs, that's where we have a good position, it's ramping up in the course of this year. Okay, and then, just on the server side, what's your expectation for that recovery? Sorry, can you, can you repeat? Oh, just for the server chips and, the server market itself? Well, I mean, the server market is a broad market. I mean, if we take the category of AI-based servers, then we expect that to continue to grow into the remaining part of this year and also into 2025. For the conventional servers, we still see weakness. We believe that in data centers, the investments that are being made by the hyperscalers are really tuned towards the AI servers, and that means that the more, let's say, conventional servers are still fairly weak. So far, I cannot report an improvement there. Thank you. Our next question comes from Charles Shi with Needham & Company. Please state your question. Hi, Giel, Megan, wanna ask a couple questions. First, glad to hear that you guys are getting traction on the organic interposer. You will come to the market in first half next year, 2025. I wonder, can you provide us a little bit of more color? Because I believe you have three customers on your 2.5D, at least that was the case 90 days ago. One, if you can give an update, and two, what's the mix in terms of engagement with your customer? How many are sticking with the silicon interposer, and how many are actually looking at the organic interposer ramp with you in first half next year? And if I may, just the third part of this question would be the tools you put in place for silicon interposer-based 2.5D versus organic interposer-based 2.5D, are they fundable? Thank you. Hi, Charles. Good to hear you. Let me start with the last part of your question with respect to the tools that we are investing in. A bit more specifics there, I think we had the first tranche of investments finalized in the second quarter, and we went for a tranche, same order of magnitude of investment that will become available in the early part of 2025, late this year, early part of 2025. Most of these tools are fungible, of course, across wafer-based technology, so that's both 2.5D with interposer as well as what you call organic interposer or high-density fan-out technology. Now, with respect to the transition from one technology to another, for the organic interposer, we are engaged with a broad range of customers. Let's say between five and 10 customers. We are currently running pilot production, initial runs, and we expect to ramp into mass production early 2025. That engagement is broader from a customer engagement perspective, and also from a product portfolio perspective. If we take the traditional 2.5D with interposer, then we, we indeed have in the order of magnitude of three to five customers where we run, let's say, a variable, let's say, volume production currently, and we expect that to continue into 2025 also. Although initially there was expected a faster changeover from one technology to another, we now see that 2.5D will continue well into 2025. Thank you. Okay. Yeah, that's great. May I ask you a second question, maybe to Megan? Hey, Megan, I think you previously expect 30%, half-over-half, revenue growth. Understandably, there's a little bit of a softness still in auto, in traditional consumer, 2.5D RAM, but looks like there's some upstream constraints on the HBM side. Does that change the 30%, half-over-half growth outlook you originally thought is going to be the case, let's say, 90 days ago? Hi, Charles. Yeah, so while there may have been some mix shift changes, and we did perform slightly better in the second quarter than expected, our full year top line expectations have not fundamentally changed. We are expecting, you know, a muted first half, followed by a stronger than seasonal significant growth in the second half. And what's driving that is also consistent with respect to our strong seasonal iOS launch cycle, our new consumer wearable program. We have installed and have incremental capacity for our 2.5D. However, that will be limited somewhat with some of the high-bandwidth memory constraints. And really, the only change then is with respect to the ongoing automotive and industrial continuing to be weak. However, for automotive and industrial, we do expect Q2 to be the trough, and we are expecting some mild recovery and increase in Q3. So overall, with respect to the shape of the year, with Q1 and Q2 outperforming somewhat, that might have adjusted the shape, but the full year expectations are the same. Thank you. Our next question comes from Randy Abrams with UBS. Please state your question. Okay, yeah, and thank you. Yeah, I wanted to follow up just on that, the prior comments you made on outlook. Just a couple clarifications, one on the HBM constraints. Is that a view? Is it a production or a yield issue that's limiting the ramp up? And is there visibility or how you're feeling is how long that constraint holds? And then I wanted to ask about, I think, your full year relatively unchanged despite a little bit of impacts on third quarter. So, if you could give an initial view, just the tail end of the year, fourth quarter, are you seeing above seasonal, and who do you see as kind of drivers continuing to Q4? Okay. Let me try to give a little bit color on the high-bandwidth memory constraints. Now, currently we're working with all three suppliers for high-bandwidth memory, so we're fully qualified for all three. You know, the constraint is not related to yield, it's related to supply from high-bandwidth memories, mostly from the biggest supplier there. It started by the end of the second quarter, and it goes into, let's say, this month, and we expect that the next two months, or the second quarter, of the third quarter, it will normalize. But overall, it has some impact on further revenue growth in the 2.5D business. With respect to your second part of the question, what are the drivers in second half growth? You know, there are in line with what we expected in the, let's say, at the end of the first quarter. The main drivers are, as Megan already highlighted, the ramp of a seasonal launch in the iOS system together with Android's recovery. So although in the second quarter, Android was sequentially slightly down, we still see a 20% year-on-year in the second quarter, and we expect that strength to continue in the remaining part of the year. So definitely in the communication side, we expect strength in the second half. Also the ramp of the IoT wearable device that will be a meaningful contribution in the second half. We executed that qualification, and we expect that ramp to go as planned, as is the 2.5D capacity expansion that we put in place. And there, you know, the outlook, the forecast is in line with expectation, and that will grow. And Megan already mentioned the rebalancing in the automotive and industrial markets. That takes slightly longer than expected, although we believe that the second quarter of 2024 is the trough, and that from here on, we see a much more balanced supply chain. The inventory situation on most of the subsegments in automotive is much more balanced than it was when we started this year. The feedback from our customers is that, you know, going into Q3, there will be a slight recovery, and then going into Q4 and 2025, the automotive market will go back to original seasonality. Randy, just to add to your question about Q4, our historical seasonality for Q4 is usually a sequential flattish to up or down, ±1%. Okay. Maybe to clarify, I guess, two follow-ups, quick follow-ups. The flat plus or minus, it sounds like your implied is it's rolling all those pieces up. So at this stage, it seems like it's a little better. And I guess the other, just the other clarification, the IOS, and it seems like your competitor also cited a little bit earlier build. Is that what you're seeing? Because I noticed second quarter, I think you had a bit. Is it, do you feel it was a little earlier, so it pulls back, and then or do you think it's actually strong, feels like it's actually stronger, so that kind of ties to the fourth quarter being better than that flat plus or minus? Yeah, we believe it's, you know, for the iOS ramp, we saw second quarter revenue better than expected. In my view, there are two elements to this. One is indeed an early build for the second half ramp, and also we saw a very large correction in the first quarter. So I believe that, you know, that correction was probably too significant, and therefore it needed to be corrected a little bit in the second quarter. So two main effects. Then other effect is more strength in the second quarter, but we also expect that to continue in the third and fourth quarter. Thank you. And our next question comes from Craig Ellis with B. Riley Securities. Please state your question. Yeah, thanks for taking the question. I wanted to follow up on some comments that seem to have been a theme through a number of prior questions, and it relates to the changes in views versus three months ago in auto and industrial, the traditional server part of the PC market, and some of the upstream constraints in high bandwidth memory. I'm wondering if it's possible to one, just rank those in terms of how they're impacting the business in the third quarter versus what you would have expected three months ago, and then in aggregate, can you quantify what that impact is versus what you were thinking back in the April 10 timeframe? Megan, can you comment to that? Yeah. So Craig, I'll, I'll give some color there. One, we didn't guide Q3, you know, a quarter ago, so just wanna establish that there. Sure. Yeah. Yeah. That there's really not a baseline for us to compare to. But as far as it does relate, we did indicate, you know, margin profile, which would have had a product mix associated with that. The auto and industrial, we had expected that to start to recover faster than it is, so that's probably the largest of the three that you mentioned, followed by the traditional data center. That one also has continued to decline. It, it's more difficult to see that within our computing segment, 'cause that's being offset by the strength in ARM-based PCs, as well as the really significant 2.5 D. And last, that's. That is impacting Q3 is, as Giel mentioned, a bit of a slower start on the incremental capacity that we've installed, given some of that high bandwidth memory constraints that we are seeing start to come back through. So from that perspective, that's the order of magnitude on those three items. That's really helpful. Thanks for clarifying, Megan. The second thing I wanted to do is just understand the AI market dynamic a little bit better. So it's encouraging to see that the business should be up a little bit in Q 2. The question may be more for Giel, regarding what you're hearing from some of your bigger customers in that area, and admittedly, there might be a lot of smaller ones, but what are they indicating about the timing of when that business really starts to come back? Would it gain materially in the fourth quarter, or are they setting an expectation that it really isn't coming back to something resembling prior health until 2025? Yeah. Yeah, that's a good, that's a good question, Craig. You know, from the customer feedback, I can give you a bit color here. First of all, you know, on calling the second quarter this year, the trough quarter for automotive, that seems to be across our customer base a consistent message. There are a few exceptions there, but the portfolio that they serve for the automotive market is slightly different. So if you look to our own exposure to the automotive markets, then our customers really consistently give us the message, the second quarter is the trough. Going from here, and, you know, if you take the impact on Amkor's revenue on a year-on-year basis, it's roughly 20% down in automotive and industrial. So from here on, we expect a gradual improvement. Now, if we take the, let's say, the improvement in the second, in the third quarter, it's still moderate, let's say, low- to- mid single-digit up versus the second quarter, but we expect that improvement to continue, but it will continue well into 2025 before we are back to our normal run rate. That's one thing. Second thing is, of course, for us, it's very important to check our market position and validate that, and we're convinced that we're still gaining market share in the automotive markets. And you may have seen the announcement in Europe with one of the bigger power companies in automotive for silicon carbide, where we're investing or co-investing in our factory in Portugal. And that project continues as planned. Actually, to some extent, we're accelerating there because they expect that the demand going towards the second half, 2025 and 2026, is actually increasing. So overall, yes, step-by-step improvements into Q3, Q4, and further improvement into 2025. To exactly predict when we are back at the full run rate is difficult to say. Although some feedback from customers gives also the indication that the tier ones and the OEMs are actually sort of overreacting to the, let's say, inventory situation. So currently, you know, some of the tier ones seem to go back to a two-week inventory level. So you may see a swing there of getting out of this correction in 2025. But for now, I think that's our assumption. Thank you. Our next question comes from Ben Reitzes with Melius Research. Please state your question. Yeah. Hi. Thanks for the question. I wanted to talk about gross margin and utilization rates. So, if you could just discuss the puts and takes on gross margin as we head into the second half. Looks like about a 0.5 point improvement on the midpoint in 3Q. And I was wondering if you were going to get more leverage in 4Q, how material that could be, you know, given the pace of sales. And then I know you had a depreciation benefit in the prior quarter. I just was wondering if there's any other puts and takes we need to be thinking about with regard to what we just saw in your outlook. Thanks. Hi, Ben. Okay, so with respect to our Q3 guide, with 15% at the midpoint for gross margin, utilization is what is constraining that, which has been, I would say, had an impact on the product mix based on the nature of the products that are underutilized or the factories that are underutilized. So with respect to our automotive and industrial being weaker than expected, that is having an impact on what we would say are highly profitable products, as well as the 2.5D, where we're not seeing the magnitude of sequential growth that we would have anticipated. That being said, we are seeing really strong growth as it relates to communications and consumers. That is primarily supported by our advanced SiP technology, and that has a very high material content. So while that is constraining the gross margin to around 15%, we are seeing very significant bottom line earnings expansion. So you'll note that our bottom line EPS is growing more than 80%. So there continues to be significant leverage in our financial model. You've also asked about potential Q4 puts and takes. While we're not guiding Q4 at this time, we do anticipate some of those product mix items to have some growth, as Giel has just mentioned, with respect to automotive, as well as our 2.5 D technology specifically. And then you also asked about the depreciation change in useful life. That was a $0.05 benefit and had an impact of, you know, around 100 basis points in Q1. That's a fairly similar impact for Q2. That will also, you know, be similar, albeit it will somewhat decline as we get into the second half and some of those assets roll off. Did that address your question, Ben? Yeah. So the depreciation was still a $0.05 benefit in the quarter you just had, and it'll diminish as you go throughout the year. Is that right? Correct. Comparable to. Yes, comparable to Q1. Okay. And then, just with regard to the interposer, you know, comment that Giel made, that, you know, for the first half of 2025, is there anything that we need to be aware of with regard to seasonality or impact on margin, you know, as you make that transition and help those customers move to that? Is there something that, you know, with regard to the model, that when it comes out, that we should be aware of? Well, a few comments there, Ben. You know, with respect to the organic interposer versus the 2.5D with interposer, you know, the value add that we deliver in organic interposer is more significant, is larger than for 2.5D, because there we procure the interposer, that interposer is not present there, but we deliver basically an organic interposer ourselves. So we expect some uplift in margin in that transition. How that transition exactly pans out depends on the product changeover. And you know, what we're currently seeing is that products in the older technologies seem to last longer, and that some of the newer products may be launched a little bit later than expected, but that's the impact that we foresee. Okay. And so it's safe to say, just going back, that communications and are better than expected, and that's continuing throughout the year. Is that the same case with the AI PC, or is the AI PC. Because there's been some reports that the AI PC has been, you know, a little muted, but you're saying it's gonna increase sequentially throughout the year. So, I believe that hits in the computing segment. So, are you seeing strength in the AI PC area, like you are in smartphones, or are you, you know, seeing it kind of below expectations? That's my final question. Thanks. Well, overall, you know, the absolute revenue in AI PC is still small. However, I mean, the transition from x86 to ARM architecture is definitely an upside for Amkor. And we believe that we have a good market position there. We started with our lead customers, you know, three generations ago, and they are currently ramping up. They're also, you know, expanding their own silicon in that same PC, so that gives us more traction. But also a second customer that launched their products that seem to be very attractive for the PC makers, and they're now launching new products in the market with that architecture. So we believe it will have legs and it will further grow. You know, some specifics over the growth during the year, or in the year. We see, you know, that over the quarters, there is a step up quarter- on- quarter. You know, from what we see now, that will continue into 2025. Thank you. And our next question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please state your question. Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking the question. My first one is on Q3, your Q3 revenue guide. Megan, you mentioned auto industrial should be up modestly, if I caught that right. Curious how you're thinking about comms, consumer and computing, comms from a seasonality perspective. I'm guessing strong double digits, but computing in particular with some of the HBM constraints that you spoke to, can that business grow double digits, or is it more like single digits? Any sort of quantitative context there would be super helpful. Hi, Toshiya. Yeah, I can give you some color there. So as mentioned, automotive, we said, would have mild, mild growth sequentially. As it relates to computing, we aren't seeing that double-digit growth that was possible given some of the, the dynamics with the high-bandwidth memory constraints. So that's also gonna be in the low- to- mid single digits for computing. Communications is gonna be very strong. You know, historically, we've seen very, very strong sequential communications ramp. That being said, we did have a stronger than seasonal Q2, so that Q3 seasonality will probably be a little bit softer, but overall it'll be the very significant. Consumer, however, with our new launch of a IoT wearable device, that will have the largest percentage increase sequentially for the quarter, and that can be, you know, up to 75% or more sequential growth given the scale of that launch. That's very helpful. Thank you. And then as my follow-up, a multi-part question on the U.S. facility. I know it's early, but just wanted to get a feel as to how you're thinking about Arizona. So timing of CapEx or capital spending outlay over the next, you know, couple of years, several years, in terms of CHIPS Act funding, how does that come through? And you know, again, long term, what percentage of capacity do you expect to have in the U.S. and the cost competitiveness of your facility in the U.S. vis-a-vis your current locations? Any color around there would be very, very helpful. Thank you. Okay. Well, let me, let me start, and then Megan can help on the, on the financial part, Toshiya. You know, the facility that we're planning to build in the U.S. is a sizable facility. I think we started off with a 40,000 sq m clean room, and currently we're working with the design companies to look at closer to a 60,000 sq m clean room. So it's, it's sizable. How much will it, will it contribute to Amkor's total? I think it will be less than 10%, significantly less than 10% of our total. But you know, that's the order of magnitude that we will grow to in the future. Now, the rate of growth and which customers and which technologies that we will ramp up, I think that's currently under evaluation. We're working with customers on the roadmap and on the ramp scenarios for each. You know, and there is definitely a high interest in the high performance computing parts, but also in the communication parts. So, early to tell, but it's a significant sizable facility in the size of what we're currently having in our K5 facility in Korea. And the same technologies will run in the U.S. as what we're currently running in Korea. I can add a few comments on the investment. As far as it relates to 2024, this won't have, you know, any material impact on our 2024 investment. We'll start to see some of that CapEx come into play in 2025, as we're planning to break ground, in the second half of 2025. But the most significant investments, which will include our machinery and equipment, those will happen in 2026 and 2027. So as it relates to CHIPS funding, it's a bit too early, to tell. Typically, those will lag the investments themselves. So as we get closer, we'll update you. With respect to 2025, we do anticipate being able to continue in our low teens capital intensity. Very helpful. Thank you so much. Thank you. Our next question comes from Krish Sankar with TD Cowen. Please state your question. Yeah, hi, thank you for taking my question. Giel, I have a first question. You mentioned, strength in AI on this computer strong. I understand it's still very small. Is there a way to quantify how much, how much the compute revenue, the total revenue is today, and where could it be exiting down the control, and how do you think about the shape of the growth longer term? Hi, Krish. You know, the line is not very clear, but the part of your question, the second part was, as I understood it well, the revenue contribution of AI currently. You know, what I can say there is that we shared the capacity ramp, that we triple our capacity by the second quarter of this year, and we executed upon that. What we can share on top of that is that we share for 2024, we will quadruple our revenue versus 2023. So it's a significant ramp for the year. You know, the exact percentage of total revenue for Amkor is still in the single digits, but it's growing rapidly. You got me level with the in on, as a percentage of your compute revenues or total revenues. So it's simply small. Is it fair to say that? Sorry, I think we missed. The line is breaking up. Let me look here at Jennifer. Jennifer, can you repeat, Krish? Yeah, I'm trying to figure out on, as a percentage of your compute revenues, how much is it today? Our compute revenue to date as a percentage of total revenue, let me find that for you. It's in the order of 15% to 17% of total revenue. On PCs, like, the non-x86 PCs, how much is that? Oh, you know, we don't go into the details. I just mentioned before that that category of PCs is just ramping up now. We have two main customers being introduced in the market. It's still, you know, below $100 million of revenue in the quarter. So, it's still relatively small. Got it. Got it. And then a follow-up for Megan. Thanks for the follow on the $400 million in PMT from CHIPS Act. But if I understand this right, you know, the $400 million in PMT you get from CHIPS Act, it requires you to spend a total of $2.7 billion in CapEx, approximately $2.3 billion of your own profit. Is that a fair assumption? And when you mentioned that the majority will come in calendar 2026, 2027, so should we assume this $2.3 billion will be spent from calendar 2025 to calendar 2026 or calendar 2028? So, Krish, again, we're trying to make sure we heard your question appropriately. I think you're referring to the timing and magnitude of our U.S. investment and how that, counterplays with the CHIPS funding. You know, for the full project, we're expecting to spend about $2 billion. We are gonna do that in phases, which is what this particular CHIPS program is aligned to. So as it relates to phase one, we expect that to, you know, within the next three years, be up and running. So we will have, you know, had an investment in the order of magnitude of, you know, $1.5 billion, in order to get that phase, you know, up and running to its fullest. Timing of that investment will be concentrated in 2026 and 2027, and the CHIPS reimbursement traditionally will lag that investment as it relates to that. We can't share further details on that at this time. Thank you. Our next question comes from Randy Abrams with UBS. Please state your question. Okay. Yes, thank you. Just a couple follow-up questions. First, for the gross margin, it seems like the one area lagging, aside from SiP, is the mature nodes. So curious, as you go into next year, and you see pick up, how the leverage is, and then also how you see the throughput or leverage for investment in the advanced packaging, given you have to spend to grow that business? Okay, let me start to give some initial comments here on mature nodes. You know, mature nodes with, you know, for Amkor, if we take our mature nodes portfolio, specifically related to wire bond and lead frame, that's very much tuned towards the automotive and industrial market. So we're not exposed to the commodity segment of the mature nodes market, where there's significant competition from China, evolving supply chain. So we believe that in the automotive market, although they declined significantly year-over-year, we were able to hold our market position for mature nodes in the automotive market. And we work with critical customers there, mostly in Europe, U.S., but yeah, on our manufacturing, but also in Japan. The dynamics in each of these markets is similar but not completely the same. But we expect that going towards the end of the year and early next year, we see a gradual recovery there. That relates to the mature nodes. With respect to the investment in advanced packaging, we already mentioned the profitability for that investment portfolio, and that product and service portfolio is higher than corporate average. And we believe, you know, that's a good investment for the company. We also believe that the 2.5D and the high-density fan-out technology is a technology, let's say, is developing as a standard technology in the high-performance computing and AI domain. We have a leadership position there, and you know, given the interest we get from a broad customer base, we believe that that will be a sustainable position going forward. The final question I just had on the OpEx, with the ramp-up of all these more complex technologies, do you see changed R&D intensity or OpEx level that you need to spend? Like, absolute dollars have to pick up or OpEx ratio to advance some of these new technologies? Hi, Randy. Yeah, we continue to focus and invest in R&D in order to ensure that we're supporting our customers in these new technologies. We don't see what I would characterize as step function in R&D. You know, that can be lumpy from time- to -time, where we have programs that are accelerating before they move into production and move into COGS. I would say from a total OpEx perspective, I wouldn't see that increasing above 8%. Thank you. At this time, I'm showing no further questions. I would like to turn the call back over to Giel for closing remarks. Okay. Thank you. Let me recap the key messages. Amkor delivered second quarter results in line with our expectations, with revenue of $1.46 billion and EPS of $0.27. We successfully brought online additional capacity for 2.5D technology and qualified our Vietnam facility to support production ramps in the third quarter. We are expecting third quarter revenue to grow significantly, with revenue of $1.835 billion at the midpoint of guidance, reflecting a 26% sequential increase. We reached a significant milestone with the U.S. Department of Commerce and aligned on a preliminary memorandum of terms for up to $400 million in direct funding under the CHIPS and Science Act to support our planned Advanced Packaging and Test facility in Arizona. Looking forward, we remain confident that the secular growth drivers for the industry remain in place, and with our strong technology leadership in advanced packaging, a uniquely diversified global footprint and partnerships with lead customers, we are well positioned to accelerate while exiting this cycle. Thank you for joining the call today. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.