Good morning and welcome to the Archrock Second Quarter 2025 Conference Call. Your host for today's call is Megan Repine, Vice President of Investor Relations at Archrock. I will now turn the call over to Ms. Repine. You may begin. Thank you, Regina. Hello, everyone, and thanks for joining us on today's call. With me today are Brad Childers, President and Chief Executive Officer of Archrock, and Doug Aron, Chief Financial Officer of Archrock. Yesterday, we released our financial and operating results for the second quarter of 2025. If you have not received a copy, you can find the information on the company's website at www.archrock.com. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, based on our current beliefs and expectations, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to Archrock's management team. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Please refer to our latest filings with the SEC for a list of factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements made during this call. In addition, our discussion today will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income, Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS, adjusted gross margin, and Cash Available for Dividend. For reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial results, please see yesterday's press release and our Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. I'll now turn the call over to Brad to discuss Archrock's second quarter results and to provide an update of our business. Thank you, Megan, and good morning, everyone. Archrock's second quarter performance was outstanding. While global macro uncertainty and stock market volatility continued during the second quarter, solid demand for natural gas and compression persisted. Our operational and financial execution continued to stand out and included several quarterly records for the company. This reflected strong underlying business performance and robust earnings power from two accretive acquisitions over the last four quarters. We recorded record adjusted EPS and Adjusted EBITDA during the quarter. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, we increased our adjusted EPS by nearly 70% and Adjusted EBITDA by more than 60%. Our fleet remained fully utilized at 96%, and on a sequential basis, we increased our contract compression operating fleet by more than 368,000 horsepower. This growth was driven by the addition of the NGCS fleet that closed on May 1, as well as high-return organic investments in new build horsepower. Notwithstanding the funding of $297 million for the NGCS acquisition, we maintained our sector-leading financial position, including a low quarter-end leverage ratio of 3.3x, driven by the stability of our cash flows and prudent acquisition financing. We raised our quarterly dividend per share by 11% compared to the prior quarter and 27% compared to a year ago, all while maintaining robust dividend coverage of 3.4x. We also accelerated the repurchase of shares under our buyback authorization, given what we believe is a dislocation between our stock performance and the strength of our current business fundamentals and future expectations. Since the inception of our share repurchase program in April of 2023, we've repurchased 2.7 million shares of common stock at an average price of $18.84 per share for an aggregate of more than $51 million. I want to be clear, based on what we are experiencing in the market today, in both our overall activity and bookings, we expect to grow our business and our profits through the rest of 2025, in 2026, and beyond. In short, we have confidence in what we're seeing in the market, confidence in our strategy, and confidence in our operations and execution. Let me unpack each of these a bit. Confidence in the market. We expect growing LNG exports and power generation needs to create a significant demand pull for U.S. Natural gas production and midstream infrastructure, including natural gas compression across all major oil and gas basins. More to come on that in a bit. Confidence in our strategy. We've solidified our position as the compression partner of choice with our customers. We've built a modern, scalable, and geographically diverse fleet, positioning us to meet this robust customer demand. Confidence in our operations and execution. Beyond our assets, we've invested in the right people, training and development, and processes and technology to deliver sustainable and attractive growth in earnings, free cash flow, and returns to our shareholders. Next, I want to dive more into the market. Fundamentals for compression are strong, and the outlook supports our expectation for continued high levels of utilization of our existing fleet and growth opportunities for new build equipment. We expect strength and durability of natural gas demand growth will provide a significant tailwind for our business well beyond 2025. LNG demand, exports to Mexico, power generation, and the emerging opportunity presented by the onshoring of AI data centers are expected to require a significant call on U.S. natural gas production to the tune of an incremental 20- 30 BCF a day by 2030, depending upon the forecast. Simply put, we need all the gas we can get, and to support this production, the U.S. will need to make substantial and broad-based investments to expand the natural gas transportation infrastructure. I want to expand a bit on the Permian, which is top of mind for many today. We operate more than 2.6 million horsepower in the Permian. Even in the most recent monthly forecast by Enverus, gas production volumes are anticipated to grow by more than 30% by 2030. This growth in excess of 30% compares to oil volume growth of 15% over the same time period. This dynamic of natural gas production outpacing oil production is one that is consistent with historical trends in other more mature associated gas plays, like the Eagle Ford and the Bakken, where rising GORs have led to natural gas volume growth long after oil volume peaks. The magnitude of the demand pull on gas production and midstream infrastructure, including gathering systems, processing plants, pipelines, and compression, cannot be satisfied by the Permian alone and will require investment across other major oil and gas shale basins. Against this backdrop, I believe Archrock's scale, broad geographic footprint, and modern fleet are best positioned to meet this customer demand. This diverse and formidable foothold has taken decades to establish and build. A few highlights worth noting include that Archrock is the largest contract compression provider in the Eagle Ford. Archrock provides compression for some of the largest midstream companies in the Haynesville, and Archrock has a meaningful presence in the Marcellus and the Rockies. Moving to our segments, our Contract Operations fleet was fully utilized during the quarter, with utilization exiting the quarter at a rate of 96%. Based on what we see in the market today, we expect to be able to maintain a high utilization for the foreseeable future. Stock activity year to date has been at historically low levels, and our compressors are staying on location longer. Based on our latest data from 2024, the average time an Archrock compressor stays on location is more than six years, representing a 52% improvement since 2021. This, we believe, is driven by a couple of factors. First, like the oil and gas business overall, the compression market is more stable and continues to be reinforced by capital discipline by our customers, by Archrock, and by others. Second, and more importantly, we've standardized and high-graded our fleets. This includes the divestiture of horsepower that is non-strategic or in non-growth plays, and our investments in large midstream horsepower and electric motor drive compression. As part of our ongoing asset management practices, on August 1, we completed the sale of approximately 155 compressors, comprising about 47,000 horsepower, to FLOCO for $71 million. This transaction is a win for both companies. The horsepower is deployed primarily in High-Pressure Gas Lift applications, a type of artificial lift used in the early stage of a well's lifecycle, and an area of expertise for FLOCO. For Archrock, we acquired these assets as part of the TOPS transaction. Proceeds from the sale will help fund our new build equipment investments and reduce our net CapEx for the year. At quarter end, we had 4.7 million operating horsepower, up from 4.3 million last quarter, or up by 368,000 horsepower. Excluding active asset sales and the NGCS horsepower addition, we grew horsepower organically by approximately 47,000 horsepower in the quarter. As we look ahead, we have a substantial contracted backlog for the second half of 2025, and we are booking units for 2026 delivery to meet continued strong customer demand, including in the Permian. For the 15th straight quarter, monthly revenue per horsepower moved higher to $23.75 during the second quarter of 2025, a new company record. We achieved a quarterly adjusted gross margin percentage of 70% for the third quarter in a row. In the aftermarket services segment, we reported quarterly revenue of more than $60 million, a level we haven't achieved since 2018. This reflected high demand for service work and an increase in contract maintenance work, as exceptional customer service is driving repeat business. In addition, we had a large engine sell order in our parts business. Second quarter AMS gross margin percentage remained at impressive levels, but was down sequentially given this higher mix of parts sales during the quarter. Shifting to our capital allocation framework for 2025, we are committed to our prudent and returns-based approach. Yesterday, we narrowed our guidance for 2025 growth capital to between $340 million- $360 million of investment in our fleet, from previously $330 million- $370 million. As a reminder, these investments are underpinned by multi-year contracts with blue-chip customers. Beyond 2025, we see a continuation of attractive growth, and the IRRs at which we expect to invest new build capital remain robust. Based on the continuation of the consistent and strong customer demand we see today, we expect 2026 growth CapEx to be not less than $250 million and within the range of investment levels that we have made annually since 2023 to support the infrastructure buildout we are experiencing in the U.S. in order to satisfy the growing demand for natural gas described earlier. As we invest in these compelling opportunities, we're committed to maintaining an industry-leading balance sheet. We plan to maintain a leverage ratio of between 3x- 3.5x. This underpins our ability to execute on our plans and opportunistically adapt to market conditions. At this level of capital expenditures, we anticipate continued growth in our earnings and free cash flow, both before and after dividends. We expect to continue to grow our dividends over time, along with this growth in our profits, and we will continue to use share buybacks as an additional tool for value creation for our shareholders. In summary, another quarter in the books reinforces our confidence in the near and long-term outlook for Archrock. High confidence in our outlook underscored the decision to raise our 2025 Adjusted EBITDA guidance, increase our quarterly cash dividend per share, and accelerate share repurchases. We believe the best is still ahead of us. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Doug for a review of our second quarter performance and to provide additional color on our updated 2025 guidance. Thanks, Brad, and good morning. Let's look at a summary of our second quarter results and then cover our updated financial outlook for 2025. Net income for the second quarter of 2025 was $63.4 million. Excluding transaction-related and restructuring costs and adjusting for the associated tax impact, we delivered adjusted net income of $68.4 million or $0.39 per share. The $0.39 per share also included the - $0.04 impact from an impairment on the High-Pressure Gas Lift business we sold to FLOCO. We reported Adjusted EBITDA of $213 million for the second quarter of 2025. Underlying business performance was strong in the second quarter as we delivered higher total adjusted gross margin dollars for the Contract Operations and aftermarket services on a sequential basis. Results further benefited from a $4 million net gain on the sale of assets, as well as $3 million in other income, primarily comprised of proceeds from insurance and other settlements. Turning to our business segments, Contract Operations revenue came in at $318 million in the second quarter of 2025, up 6% compared to the first quarter of 2025 and 41% compared to the prior year period. The increase reflects horsepower growth, organic and acquired, as well as higher pricing. Compared to the first quarter, we grew our adjusted gross margin dollars by more than $11.5 million. We delivered a record adjusted gross margin percentage of approximately 70% for the third straight quarter. In our aftermarket services segment, we reported second quarter 2025 revenue of $65 million compared to the first quarter 2025 of $47 million. Second quarter 2025 AMS adjusted gross margin percentage was 23% compared to 25% in the first quarter of 2025 and consistent with guidance. On May 1, 2025, we closed the NGCS transaction. We funded the cash portion of the total consideration for NGCS with a combination of equity and debt to keep us on track to achieve our financial targets, including our objective of maintaining a consistent leverage ratio of 3x- 3.5x. Archrock issued 2.25 million new common shares to the sellers and funded the $297 million cash portion of total consideration with available capacity under our ABL credit facility. Shortly after completion of the transaction, we closed on the upsizing of our ABL facility from $1.1 billion- $1.5 billion with strong support from our existing lender group. This brought our period-end total debt to $2.6 billion and available liquidity to $675 million. Our leverage ratio at quarter end was 3.3x, calculated as quarter-end total debt divided by our trailing 12-month EBITDA. This was up slightly from 3.2x in the first quarter of 2025, reflecting the acquisition. With our prudent financing strategy across two transactions in the last year and our expectation for continued strong performance in our business, we expect to continue deleveraging as the year progresses. The increase in discretionary cash flow from the addition of TOPS and NGCS further enhances our financial flexibility and capacity to increase dividends to our shareholders over time. We recently declared a second quarter dividend of $0.21 per share or $0.84 on an annualized basis, our second increase in 2025 and third since our acquisition of TOPS last year. Our second quarter dividend reflected an increase of 11% over the first quarter 2025 dividend level and an increase of 27% over the second quarter 2024 dividend level. Cash Available for Dividend for the second quarter of 2025 totaled $125 million, leading to an impressive quarterly dividend coverage of 3.4x. In addition to increasing the dividend, during the quarter, we repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares for approximately $29 million at an average price of $23.49 per share. This left approximately $59 million in remaining capacity for additional share repurchases as of the end of the second quarter of 2025. Turning to our updated outlook, Archrock increased its 2025 annual guidance to reflect continued outperformance during the second quarter and growth in the second half of the year. Our guidance reflects eight months of contribution from the NGCS transaction and outperformance in our business, partially offset by the removal of five months of contribution of the High-Pressure Gas Lift business we sold to FLOCO. We are raising our 2025 Adjusted EBITDA range to $810 million- $850 million from the prior range of $790 million- $830 million. Segment-level revenue and adjusted gross margin detail can be found in our earnings release issued last night. Turning to capital, including NGCS, we are narrowing our growth CapEx guidance range to between $340 million and $360 million to support investment in new build horsepower and repackaged CapEx to meet continued customer demand. Our growth CapEx is underpinned by multi-year contracts and was first half weighted. Maintenance CapEx is still forecasted to be approximately $110 million- $120 million. We now anticipate approximately $35 million- $40 million in other CapEx, primarily for new vehicles. Total capital expenditures are expected to be funded by operations and further supported by non-strategic asset sale proceeds, which total more than $102 million in 2025 year to date, including the sale we announced last night. In summary, the supportive market conditions remain in place and the operational transformation of Archrock's business from its prior positioning, as well as ongoing investments in our high-quality asset base, innovative processes, and technology are driving consistent and repeatable success. We believe our production-oriented business, high-graded operation, and outstanding financial position provide us with differentiated earnings and cash flow growth ahead. With that, Regina, we are now ready to open the line for questions. At this time, if you'd like to ask a question, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. We ask that you please limit your questions to one and one follow-up. Our first question will come from the line of Gab Moreen with Mizuho Securities. Please go ahead. Gab, your line might be on mute. Our next question will come from the line of Eli Johnson with JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to start on the outlook for capacity additions in 2026 and beyond. Your remarks mentioned 2026 CapEx not below $250 million, and so, you know, we can imagine orders are filling up into 2026. Just how does the order book next year compare to what you saw this year, and the outlook for organic unit adds next year? Thanks. Thanks for the question. The order book that we're seeing reflects the inherent growth in the business. The summary I'd offer is that our customers are busy and our customers are ordering equipment ahead of schedule. What we normally see, this is, I think, the earliest that we've offered any outlook on guidance for CapEx for the year ahead. The reason for that is that what we see in the order book is we're already, you know, approaching the levels that we see that minimum investment level at. The good news is we see just with the demand for natural gas growing based on LNG demand, AI data centers, distributed power demand, we see our customers getting very busy to put in place the infrastructure to meet that growing demand. Our order book to date reflects a strong order book, very consistent with what we've seen year- over- year. It's already clear to us that we have at least a minimum investment level indicative of that growth ahead that we could share with our investors at this time. Understood. I appreciate the color there. Maybe just thinking about the outlook for pricing, as you see it now, I think we continue to see revenue per horsepower per month tick up quarter over quarter. Just in terms of the outlook for that in the second half of 2025 and in 2026, should we expect to see pricing continue to tick up? How have contract terms with customers evolved? Is there any sort of change in terms of term that they're looking for? Color there would be great. I have two fronts I want to take that on. The first is pricing, and then the second one is contract term and time on location. For pricing, what we see right now is that our opportunity for revenue increases is reflecting a more normalized level of inflation. We think about that year- over- year. We're in the mid-single digits across most horsepower categories, and we expect to stay in that type of a range looking ahead based upon the inflation that we're anticipating. That's where we think we have that pricing prerogative. Importantly, however, revenue per horsepower pricing is not the only tool to drive profitability. Part of what you've seen is not just top line growth, but the continued improvement and stabilization of high margins, especially in our Contract Operations business, as we have through the investment in systems, processes, efficiencies, and candidly, the right people, driven our revenue higher while maintaining our cost at a very, you know, candidly, much flatter level. It's because of the changes and the transformation of the platform that we've invested in now over the course of a number of years. Thinking about our contract terms, our contract terms remain the same for large horsepower, targeting that three to five-year base term. Importantly, as I put in our prepared remarks, based on a study that we did in the most recent quarter, what we're seeing is that independent of contract term, our units are staying on location on average greater than six years. This is a tremendous level of stability that we're achieving, and it again reflects the repositioning of this business to focus on large infrastructure position midstream horsepower and the electric motor drive businesses that we've invested in. Finally, I do want to point out that the order book that we described for 2026, nothing is ordered without a contract in hand. It's not speculative investment expecting that they will show up. The way this industry is working today and the way we are running our business today is that we place orders for horsepower for our fleet only when we have a firm commitment and a firm contract in hand from our customers. Understood. Thanks. Our next question will come from the line of Jim Rollyson with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, guys. Brad, if I go back to the beginning of the year and what we were looking at for growth and investment in data centers and power-driven gas demand over the next several years, as well as LNG, they both have actually gone up over the last six months. That long-term outlook doesn't seem like it's changed. It's only gotten actually better. Obviously, we've got some softer oil macro, and you've touched on this a little bit. I would love to hear some color of what you're hearing from your core customers, you know, in the Permian, but also from other basins, if you're actually seeing that reflected in the order book that we're obviously going to have to need to meet this demand some way. If the Permian isn't growing quite as fast, maybe with the rig count slowed down, you know, just love to hear what you're seeing from that level of detail, please. Thanks, Jim. What we see with our customer base right now is consistent activity. To be really clear, the Permian is still leading the order book by like 60%- 80%, depending upon how you cut the timeframe. Even in the nearest firm, we're looking at 55% of our order book in the quarter coming from the Permian. Interestingly, that means the rest is coming from other plays as well. Although it is all incremental compared to the volumes that we see in the Permian, we do see activity in the Eagle Ford, in the Haynesville, in the DJ, the Powder River in particular, a little bit in the Marcellus. We see that the reactivation of some of the dry gas plays, but certainly the continued growth and investment in all of the shale plays is something that we see ahead. There is uncertainty, however, as to how much of that gas is going to come or need to come from these other plays, depending upon how the Permian performs. In any event, really importantly, the Permian gas volumes, our compression business in the Permian is going to grow near-term, medium-term, and long-term. It's just so much volume is tied up there in that most cost-effective play that we have in the country that that seems to be an inescapable dynamic in the production of oil and gas that we see ahead. That's very helpful. Maybe as a follow-up, just curious, the last time we spoke a quarter ago, really hadn't seen much of an impact at that stage on the tariff front. I'd love to get an update there, if possible, from your OEMs. We don't expect a material impact to the tariffs on our business, certainly not in 2025 and very limited in 2026. The supply chain that feeds us is predominantly U.S.-based and domestic. In any event, any cost increases that we would expect for 2025 have been put into our guidance, but it's just been very negligible as an impact to our business and our outlook. Thanks for the color, Brad, and nice results. Maybe you guys can get to executing on that remaining $59 million in repurchases given your share price today. Thank you, Jim. Our next question comes from the line of Nate Pendleton with Texas Capital. Please go ahead. Good morning. Congrats on the strong quarter. Historically, your contract compression model has been resilient throughout commodity cycles, as has been discussed over the past few quarters. Now that we've seen the rigs dropping, can you talk in a little bit more detail about the elasticity of demand for your horsepower? Specifically, how much of that 2026 order book is durable versus potentially subject to customer delays or renegotiation? Thank you for the question. The order book that we have in place and the level that we talked about, we think is durable, and it's robust and durable. We are not expecting any shifting in that level of spend. I am going to point out what we cited was an expectation for a minimum level of spend that's going to be required to meet customer demand. I think that the odds are greater that we're going to have a higher, you know, top end to our guidance when we can give top end guidance. Right now, we had enough of an order book build that we thought we could share that level of growth that we think that is in the books for 2026 at this earlier date. We think it is durable. I might just add, I realize, you know, what we see reflected on the screen, what we're seeing in some other calls is that, you know, maybe some uncertainty around oil activity. I think Brad hit it really well in his prepared remarks. Natural gas volumes in North America are growing and growing meaningfully, and we are seeing that reflected in historically low levels of stock activity for our equipment. Again, with large midstream customers that are seeing a significant amount of new gas coming online in 2026 is what is supporting, you know, our view for that minimum level of CapEx. It is, you know, we are there for our customers, and we expect that gas to come, even if oil production doesn't grow at the same rate that we have been seeing it grow over the last several years. Got it. I really appreciate the color, Brad and Doug. If I may, my second question, in the prepared remarks, you talked about your geographic diversification. Can you talk a little bit more about the current competitive dynamics you're seeing outside the Permian, and if there are opportunities to expand any of those basins really in a meaningful way going forward? Every basin has a couple of players in it at least, so every basin has a competitive dynamic. What we're experiencing in this market, however, is that with our customer base, we are essentially their partner and contract compression provider of choice. When they have horsepower needs, they predominantly come to us. I think that that works for others in the market as well, but it gives us a much better planning cycle, look into the market, and level of dependence because of the very critical position we play in the operational kind of capabilities of our customers as well as in their capital stack. They know they can count on us to deliver excellent service in the field. They know they can count on us to bring equipment and our capital to bear when they need it. That creates a very close working relationship and dependence between us and our top customers with which we put out new capital and expect to grow. Understood. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Doug Irwin with Citi. Please go ahead. Thanks for the question. I just wanted to start by getting your latest thoughts around gas allocation, given that you leaned pretty heavily on the buyback program this quarter and obviously announced a dividend increase as well. Just curious how you're thinking about buybacks versus dividend growth moving forward, given both your level of confidence in the outlook moving forward, which is more durable, and then maybe some of the asset sales that potentially free up some more one-time cash flow here as well. Doug, thanks for the question. On a good news front, we expect to grow this business. We expect to grow our profits, and that means we expect to be able to continue to return the amount of capital we return to our investors, both in the form of dividend as well as in the form of buybacks. The dividend rate that we get to grow at with the coverage that we have, I think, should be viewed as our expectation is if the business continues to perform the way it has over the last several years and quarters, that we should have the opportunity to increase our dividend consistent with the way that you've seen it raised over the last several years and quarters. Buybacks, on the other hand, are activated by our potential value capture on what we see as the ability to not just return capital to our investors and to our shareholders, but based on the price in the market. We are definitely price-sensitive on that, and currently, we might be ambitious, but that's the way we think of it. Both are tools we expect to use to the benefit of our investors going forward. Understood. I was just hoping you could help unpack the updated guidance range a little bit here. There were obviously a few different moving pieces with acquisitions and sales and some of the updated segment margins as well. Just curious how much of this guidance you would categorize as maybe being more non-recurring tied to gains on asset sales and things like that versus more operational outperformance across the two segments that's going to be a bit more ratable moving forward here. Yeah, I'll take that one, Doug. Look, let's start with outperformance in both our legacy and acquired businesses on the contract compression side. That's a little less than half of the $20 million guide upwards. It's, you know, about $9 million comes from that outperformance. On the AMS side, with gross margins and revenues both being a little higher than forecasted, albeit gross margins on AMS were slightly lower because of the part sale that Brad mentioned. That's about $4 million of it. That gets you to sort of call it $13 million of the $20 million. We had $4 million in asset sale gains in the quarter and about $3 million in other income that we talked about, mostly being from insurance sales. I think it's important to understand that $20 million in increase was offset by the assets that we sold in the FLOCO transaction. While we're not giving any guidance on what that EBITDA was, all of that kind of gets you to the $20 million that we raised guidance by today. Got it. That's helpful detail. Appreciate the time. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steve Ferazani with Sidoti. Please go ahead. Afternoon, everyone. Appreciate all the detail on the call. The other piece I wanted to ask about, Brad and Doug, was the strength in the aftermarket because that was certainly how you beat me on revenue in the quarter, and you did raise the aftermarket guidance. Can you talk about what happened in the quarter and how much, how extendable that is? Was there anything specific there? Overall, we've been really pleased, very pleased with how the aftermarket services businesses have performed, especially over the last probably now going on eight quarters. Part of what you're seeing just reflects the market needs equipment, and it needs equipment to run, and that has placed more demand on both of our businesses, contract compression, as well as our aftermarket services businesses. Our customers are doing a better job maintaining their own equipment and to maintain better run times for themselves. That overall market dynamic, we think, is definitely sustainable. We don't see that changing in the near term. Our team has done an excellent job capturing that and doing good work, excellent work for our customers. We see that part of it being sustainable. What I will point out, as I put in my prepared remarks on the top line, however, this quarter did include a large sum engine sales that took the top line up and also diluted the margin just a little bit. We don't expect that to repeat. That's a more unusual transaction. It happens, but it's more unusual. Overall, we remain ambitious about the value we can bring to our customers and that we can get from this aftermarket services business today. Right. I want to ask about the mix in the order book. We know electric demand was growing, but in this more volatile oil price environment, knowing that that's higher priced and knowing a lot of your customers are cost-conscious, are you seeing any shift away from electric to go to a lower cost option? We are seeing a shift in the mix to include more gas drive and incrementally less electric motor drive, but it's not as sharp a turn as you might expect. I think looking ahead, we expect 20%- 25% of the business to be CapEx to go toward electric motor drive compared to where we were, which was 30% or higher previously. It's tapered off a bit. The issue, however, I don't believe is cost. The issue is power availability. What we're seeing is tremendous strain on the grid and the inability of even distributed power opportunities to keep up with the overall demand. I think that is driving some of our customers to include more gas drives where they would have had a preference for electric motor drives had power been available. Okay. That makes sense. Thanks, Brad. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Selman Akyol with Stifel. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning, and appreciate you taking the questions. Just going back to the order book, I just want to ask the question a little bit differently. You referenced the $275 million, and you haven't done that previously. My question directly is, if we look back to 2024, are you ahead this time this year as opposed to where you were last year? Selman, number one, I want to just take on the number. What we guided was that we see a minimum of $250 million for 2026 CapEx. That's okay. I just wanted to get that out. I'd say we're very much in line with what we saw at this point in 2024 and in prior years, but we have more clarity in the order book today than I think we may have had at that time of the year. We also know that, candidly, a lot of the discussion today and questions from our investors are focused on what's going on in the market and are we going to see a pause in the growth in investment in infrastructure because we're seeing a decline in rig count and we're seeing some lay down for crews also in oil and gas services. Our answer to that included the fact that we wanted to come out with what we're seeing in the market today to say very distinctly that is not what we expect to experience. We had growth in 2025. We expect growth in 2026, and our order book, including the level of minimum capital commitment that we see, we thought was helpful information to support our assertion that notwithstanding the macro, our business is poised to perform and to grow. Got it. Appreciate that. My apologies. You referred in your opening comments, you talked about the largest contractor in the Eagle Ford and in the Haynesville. I was just going to ask you if you could expand a little bit more on what you're seeing in the Haynesville. We see activity, and what we said on the Haynesville in particular is that we support the business of some of the largest midstream operators in the Haynesville is the way we characterize that. We do see incremental demand in the Haynesville. I'll point out again, it pales in scale to what we see going on in the Permian, but we do see constructive and profitable horsepower additions going into that play into the Haynesville, which we're happy to see. Right now, I think that the Permian is attracting so much capital, so much labor, and so much operational focus. We like seeing a diversification of the growth in every other play that we can see growth in as well. That's the nature of what we want to show there. All right. Thank you so much. Thank you. Again, for questions, press star one. Our next question comes from the line of Josh Jane with Daniel Energy Partners. Please go ahead. Thanks for taking my question. Just one sort of longish one from me, which is the prepared remarks you talked about, the dislocation that you believe exists between the share price today and future expectations. Could you expand on that a bit more and how you're ultimately thinking about that? Because you've been buying back stock, obviously, at the dividend, but it sounded like you were potentially going to be a bit more aggressive moving forward on the buyback based on what you're seeing in the business and you know thoughts on '26 and '27. Long-winded question, but has anything changed in the last six months or so to make you more aggressive about using those tools? Maybe you could just expand on that mindset a little bit. Sure. I'll share a few thoughts. First, we have great confidence in the future of this business. Again, our confidence is both near, medium, and long-term. That makes us ambitious about the way this company is operating. Second, we've transformed this platform significantly to focus on large horsepower, very stable midstream applications and operations. From the term that we stay on location, you've seen a complete change, almost close to the doubling of the time we stay on location with our units. The stability of this business is there as well. The macro environment has got us poised for growth. It means that we are very strategic in using both our dividends and the share buybacks as a way to return capital to investors. We are not price-insensitive. What's changed over the most recent environment is that the market seems to be valuing energy and valuing some of our shares less than we think. Ultimately, in the longer term, a more stable market should be the case. That does make us want to look at using both tools as well as we can to return capital and cash to our investors. I just would add one additional comment, which is a bit of a differentiating point, I think, in the compression space. That is we have the lowest leverage in the industry. We have continued to delever over the last couple of years, which has put us in a position to be able to do that. Yes, we see our share price is very attractive. I think I said in my prepared comments that it's our expectation that we will continue to delever through the year. I do think as folks think about Archrock and compare us to some of our peers, perhaps that's a bit of a differentiating factor. Great, thanks. Actually, just one quick follow-up. You had mentioned that equipment staying on location is sort of 50% longer than it was in 2021. How do you see that evolving going forward? Like when we're sitting here, you know, two, three, five years from now, how do you ultimately see that playing out based on what you're seeing today? We believe that number is likely to extend to longer over a period of time. I'm going to point out that the amount of turnover in the fleet varies significantly by horsepower size. Since we're adding predominantly more large horsepower into the mix, that is by nature going to pull that term into more years, not less. We think that number is going to continue to increase over time based on the investment profile and the position we have in the infrastructure and midstream marketplace today. Thanks. I'll turn it back. Thanks. There are no further questions. I'll turn the call back over to Mr. Childers for any final remarks. Great. Thank you, everyone, for participating in our Q2 2025 review. I look forward to updating you on our progress next quarter. Thank you. This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.