Good afternoon, and welcome to Astra's Q2 2021 earnings conference call. Joining us today are Astra's Founder, Chairman, and CEO, Chris Kemp, CFO, Kelyn Brannon, and Vice President of Compliance and Deputy General Counsel, Michael Stitcher. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there'll be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you need to press star one on your telephone. If you require any further assistance, please press star then zero. I would now like to turn the call over to Michael for introductory remarks. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us for Astra's Q2 2021 earnings call. After the market closed, we released our financial results. The earnings release is available on the SEC's website and our investor relations website at investor.astra.com, where you can also find a link to our investor presentation. This teleconference is also being broadcast over the internet and will be archived and available on our investor relations website. During our call today, we will reference non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe to be useful to investors as our management team uses these non-GAAP financial measures to plan, monitor, and evaluate our financial performance. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items that should not be considered a substitute for comparable GAAP financial measures. Astra's methods of computing these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from similar non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. A description of these items, along with the reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures, can be found in our earnings release. Today's call will also contain forward-looking statements that refer to future events, including Astra's future financial outlook. When used in this call, the words anticipate, could, enable, estimate, intend, expect, believe, potential, will, should, project, and similar expressions as they relate to Astra are, as such, a forward-looking statement. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and as a result, Astra's actual future results and performance may differ materially from those discussed in this call. We encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, in which we describe the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. We also refer to commercial launches in this press release. When we use the phrase commercial launch, commercial revenue launch, or commercial orbital launch, we mean a launch conducted under an FAA commercial launch license. Additionally, each of our launch vehicles is noted by an asset title with the abbreviation of LV, standing in for launch vehicle, followed by the serial number. For instance, our current launch vehicle is referenced as LV0006. Finally, I would like to remind everyone this call will be recorded, and it will be made available for replay via a link available on the investor relations section of our website. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Chris Kemp, Astra's founder, chairman, and CEO. Chris? Thanks, Michael. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Welcome to our first earnings call as a public company. Let's see slide three. The end of our Q2 coincided with the completion of our merger transaction with Holicity, which generated $464 million of net cash proceeds to fund our continued development and mark the start of Astra trading on the Nasdaq exchange under the ticker ASTR on July 1st. Both of these events are major milestones in our mission to improve life on Earth from space. Another important milestone is our upcoming launch for the United States Space Force, which we announced last week. This is our first commercial launch and the first launch of our upgraded Rocket 3.3, which I'll discuss later. The Space Force launch is planned during a window that begins August 27th and will be open through September 11th and will test Astra's ability to deliver a payload to a precise orbit. This is a unique opportunity to serve the Space Force in the first of several launches aimed at validating their use of low-cost, mobile, and responsive launch services. All of us at Astra are excited to get back to space. I want to spend a few minutes discussing Astra's mission to deliver rapid, low-cost access to space. I'll share some highlights from our Q2 and provide more details on our current and future areas of focus. Later, Kelyn will walk you through the financial highlights of the Q2. Let's move on to slide 4. For those of you who are new to the Astra story, first, some brief background. Adam London, my co-founder, and I spent years independently learning about the difficulty of cost-effectively accessing space, working with MIT, NASA, DARPA, and other leading technology organizations. We were lucky enough to cross paths and share common views on bringing innovation to space. Namely, the inefficiency of the prior 50 years was directly attributed to the approach of legacy aerospace companies. Big rockets designed to carry people or very expensive satellites, burdened by inefficient supply chains and underwritten by deep-pocketed governments. There was little incentive to innovate. We believe that the space industry was ripe for technology-led innovation. Today, space technology is gaining traction with new low Earth orbit, LEO, satellites, which have rapidly become smaller, cheaper, and more numerous than legacy satellites. The challenge is that launch vehicles have not evolved in the same way. Most rockets remain focused on physical size and a level of reliability necessary to carry out human spaceflight missions and deliver large communication satellites to geostationary orbits tens of thousands of miles from Earth. As a result, we believe most existing launch vehicles are too large, too expensive, too infrequently launched, and insufficiently responsive to meet the needs of the emerging space tech industry. Please turn to slide five. We aim to solve this problem with the world's first mass-produced orbital launch system, consisting of small launch vehicles and mobile launch infrastructure that can fit inside standard shipping containers that can be rapidly deployed anywhere in the world. Our rocket requires a launch site with merely a concrete pad with the support of six people in the field, leveraging our highly automated launch operations. Our rocket's payload capacity is tailored to the needs of modern LEO satellite constellations, allowing precise and rapid placement of individual satellites into their required orbits. We believe this makes Astra's system more responsive and affordable than alternatives for the thousands of LEO satellites planned for launch in the next decade. In December 2020, we successfully launched Rocket 3.2 to an altitude of 380 kilometers, successfully passing the Kármán line and demonstrating orbital launch capability. This launch demonstrated orbital capability in that an identically performing launch from Cape Canaveral, for example, would have reached orbit at our target orbital velocity and target altitude. Launching to polar orbits like Kodiak, Alaska, requires more performance than low inclination orbits. While we considered making only small changes and flying again, given how well the rest of the system performed, we decided to complete the remaining upgrades planned to increase payload capacity and transition the launch vehicle into production. Highlights of our upgrades include stretching the first stage tank to increase propellant capacity, reducing the mass of the upper stage, adding sensors to gather more data about flight environments, and consolidating over a dozen individual components on the upper stage into a single assembly. Making any changes to a complex system like a rocket always involves risk. We appreciate this, but also believe that maximizing our learning requires us to make advances and take appropriate technical risks. With rockets, a launch is the only way to test the entire system. We've carefully evaluated all of our changes, completed component and system testing, and shipped LV0006 to Kodiak for the upcoming launch window. As we move forward to a more regular launch cadence, Astra is fortunate to have customers, investors, and team members with the grit to endure the risks inherent in the development of a new launch system because they understand the importance of frequent, low-cost access to space. After nearly five years of hard work and incredible learnings, this strategy has allowed us to reach the milestone of our first commercial orbital launch in less than half the time of our peers. While we are proud to be the fastest launch company to reach space and demonstrate orbital capability, we acknowledge that we must continue to be relentless in our development and rigorous in our testing to maximize the probability of success of each new version of our system, even if we cannot guarantee it. We accept this challenge, regardless of the outcome of our upcoming launch, we have additional rockets on the production line and remain on plan to complete these launches before the end of the year. To this end, we've begun ramping up hiring of production personnel, and we're pleased with the quality of the talent we continue to attract. Our target for this design is to ultimately produce and launch this version of our rocket at a monthly rate, with the next two rockets, LV0007 and LV0008, currently taking shape in our factory. Please turn to slide six. Turning to market demand, excitement about a new wave of small satellites in LEO and well-capitalized constellation customers translate to strong demand for launch services. Customer indications of launch needs suggest that demand is years away from being fulfilled. Our differentiated, low-cost, rapid launch strategy, combined with our demonstrated launch success in 2020, helped Astra amass a backlog of over 50 launches, representing over $150 million of contracted revenue, which we disclosed in our February merger announcement. Earlier this year, we announced our second NASA contract, TROPICS, in a competitive and thorough bidding process versus other major launch service companies. TROPICS is a three-launch contract to rapidly deploy a global six-satellite constellation to observe tropical cyclones, which really highlights the benefits of Astra's approach to responsive small launch. This was Astra's second NASA win in a row after receiving the ELaNa CubeSat mission contract in December of last year. Following the two NASA wins, we announced a launch agreement with Planet Labs. Astra expects to begin a multi-launch mission for Planet starting in 2022 to further its position as the leading provider of global daily satellite imagery and geospatial solutions. Earlier this week, we announced Astra was awarded the Orbital Services Program, OSP-004 contract from the Rocket Systems Launch Program for the Space Force. This positions us to compete for up to $1 billion in launch services over the next nine years. We also announced a launch contract with Spire today. Our NASA, Planet, Space Force, and Spire wins are objective evidence of both our technical capabilities and the cost-efficient launch services for government and commercial customers that we can provide. Move to slide seven. Turning to recent company developments. In June, we announced the acquisition of Apollo Fusion, a leading design and manufacturing company of some of the world's most efficient electric propulsion engines. The purchase price for Apollo was $145 million, including earn-outs. I'm particularly pleased that Apollo selected Astra amongst a handful of competitive offers and elected to receive two-thirds of the total consideration in Astra shares, a testament to the vision of our joint opportunity. Apollo is a real differentiator for Astra customers by allowing them to move beyond LEO to medium, GEO, and even lunar orbits, or maintain any orbit for a longer period of time. In addition, Apollo makes Astra a more versatile launch provider as well as increases our total addressable market. Their incredible team, led by CEO Mike Cassidy, will also play a key role in the development of our spacecraft platform. We turn to our state-of-the-art facilities. Astra headquarters is located on the former U.S. Naval Air Station in Alameda, California, just on the San Francisco Bay, 15 minutes outside of the financial district. We currently reside in more than 100,000 sq ft of manufacturing, office, and launch system development space. In May, we began an expansion of more than 200,000 sq ft, which we expect to complete by the end of this year. When complete, our facilities will total approximately 350,000 sq ft, enough to support our long-term plan of producing one rocket per day. Our facilities are a unique differentiator in the space tech industry. Almost all of our competitors must transport their rockets and their engines from their factory to remote locations to test performance. Astra engineers with experience at other launch companies describe a lengthy and highly inefficient process to assess engine performance by testing in remote locations. Our facility is unique in the industry and permits us to test engines multiple times a day, every day. This is a key enabler of our goal to constantly improve. Moving to slide eight. Now on to our incredible team. All of our efforts wouldn't be possible without building upon our extraordinary team. I spend a significant portion of my time identifying and recruiting talented people to help us accomplish great things at Astra. Our goal is more than just hiring smart people. We're building a culture that is comfortable taking on challenges and overcoming them. Several high-profile hires have joined Astra from leading companies like Apple, SpaceX, Tesla, and Blue Origin. They do something unique and untried in the space industry. Adam and I take great pride in the team at Astra, and we admire their grit and determination. During the Q2, we added 62 new employees and ended the quarter with 188 total employees. Most of these additions are in the areas of design, engineering, and software to keep us on the path to daily launches. We made several important and strategic additions to our board in the past couple of months. We're thrilled to welcome our newest board members, including Michèle Flournoy and Lisa Nelson, we announced yesterday and earlier today. Michèle and Lisa join current independent board directors Michael Lehman and Craig McCaw, both of whom joined in June, and our long-term director and trusted mentor, Scott Stanford from ACME Capital, who serves as our lead independent director. A few words about our board members. Michèle Flournoy was Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy under President Bill Clinton and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy under President Obama. She is widely respected and a strategic advisor with unique skills and experience in the defense industry. Lisa Nelson spent 14 years at Microsoft in various executive positions before co-founding Microsoft's venture group, M12. She's an accomplished executive with global success in finance and business development and a history of advising and serving on boards of young growth companies. Michael Lehman possesses extensive CFO and general finance experience from innovative and highly successful technology companies such as Arista Networks, Palo Alto Networks, and Sun Microsystems. Finally, Craig McCaw is the Chairman and CEO of Eagle River, which is focused on strategic investments in the telecommunications industry. Craig is a successful entrepreneur who started and built many companies in the cable, cellular, and broadband industries, including McCaw Cellular. Astra is extremely fortunate to have this group of talented, knowledgeable, and passionate advisors to help us navigate and execute our growth goals in this emerging space tech industry. I'd like to turn the call over to our CFO, Kelyn Brannon, to discuss our Q2 results. Kelyn? Thank you, Chris. Good afternoon, everyone. As Chris noted, our Q2 results were steady and solid, and we continue moving from a primarily development-driven company to a production focus. Now let me run through the details. As a reminder, all non-revenue financial figures I will discuss today are non-GAAP, unless I state them as a GAAP measure. You will find a reconciliation from GAAP to non-GAAP results in today's press release. On June 30th, we completed our merger with Holicity. This transaction, including the PIPE transaction led by BlackRock, provided Astra with $464 million of cash proceeds and offers us a solid foundation as we progress to our plan of reaching a daily launch cadence. These cash proceeds were net of certain one-time expenses related to underwriting, legal, accounting, and other fees. Earlier this week, we filed our amended Form S-1 registration statement with the SEC. In connection with that filing, we registered the resale of shares issued to our PIPE investors, certain of our affiliates, and the Holicity sponsor in the business combination. We also registered the shares issuable pursuant to the public and private warrants that were issued prior to the de-SPAC, and the shares issued and issuable pursuant to our Apollo Fusion transaction. We have not yet met the requirements to do a mandatory redemption of the outstanding public warrants. As a result, we have not decided whether we will redeem the warrants if we meet such requirements. As Chris mentioned in his remarks, we plan to launch our first commercial test payload for Space Force as the window opens between August 27th through September 11th. The contract we have with the Space Force also includes a second launch that we expect to occur later this year. We ended the quarter with cash equivalents, and restricted cash of $452.4 million. We did not generate any revenue during the Q2. Q2 2021 adjusted net loss was $23.1 million and $31.3 million on a GAAP basis. Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of $21.4 million for the quarter. Capital expenditures totaled $8.5 million in the Q2, comprised primarily of the expansion of our Alameda headquarters and investments in manufacturing equipment. I'll provide an outlook for our Q3 ending September 30, 2021. We currently expect adjusted EBITDA to be a loss between approximately $32 million and $35 million. Depreciation and amortization to be between $1 million and $1.3 million. Stock-based compensation to be between $6 million and $10 million. Cash taxes are forecasted to be $0. Basic shares outstanding to be between $255 million and $260 million, and capital expenditures to be between $10 million and $15 million. Let me provide a bit more context on our expected spend for Q3 2021. Q3 operating expenses are tracking ahead of our projected financials and will be up sequentially from Q2 2021. The increase is due to our broader investment in our product roadmap, program execution, and operational capacity as we look to expand opportunities in our operational model. In addition, we accelerated headcount in our back office function to strengthen our ability to support the business and operate as a public company. Offsetting the increase in operating expenses in Q2 2021, CapEx in the H1 of the year and expected spend in the Q3 are tracking below our projected financials for 2021. The underspend is due to a delayed start to our factory build-out. We expect that capital spend or that underspend to shift to 2022 through early 2024. I want to highlight our updated risk factors in our forthcoming 10-Q for the Q2. The merging of Astra and Holicity included two sets of risk factors, and after an in-depth review, we are including a comprehensive list of risk factors for new Astra. As we transition from a pre-revenue company to regular commercial launches, we plan to offer a more detailed outlook regarding revenue and spend in the quarters to come. With that, I'll turn the call back to Chris. Thanks, Kelyn. The commencement of commercial launch services is an important milestone for Astra. Our design, manufacturing, and software engineers are focused on identifying efficiencies that are not only reducing costs, but increasing performance and reliability of our services. We have a talented team making many decisions along this path, and we're optimistic that we will make mistakes along the way, knowing that our strategy will be to continue to make the next launch better, as we believe rapid iteration is our key differentiator versus other launch providers. Starting on August 27th, when our launch window opens, we will initiate the launch of LV0006 and live stream the event on our website at astra.com. We look forward to updating you on the subsequent launches later this year, in line with our core belief in the value of launch, learn, and repeat. With that, let's open the call for questions. Ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question or a comment at this time, please press the star then the one key on your touch tone telephone. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press the pound key. Our first question comes from Edison Yu with Deutsche Bank. Thank you, and congratulations on coming public and the Q1 out the gate. Had some questions, some strategic, some operational, and maybe sneak in a financial one. On the upcoming launch, first commercial one, could you maybe go through what still needs to get done operationally, ahead of that time in the next two, three, four weeks? Can you provide maybe any more details on the payload for the Space Force? I think, Edison, we shift the rocket up to Kodiak. It will be riding along with the entire launch system on Monday of next week. The team will be deployed to Kodiak to set up the launcher and transport the rocket out to our spaceport at the Pacific Spaceport Complex. This is a pretty routine thing. We've done this with each of our launches. We set up the launcher, and there's a wet dress rehearsal where the rocket is loaded with propellants, and we check everything out to make sure that it wasn't damaged in shipping. We go into the launch, which window opens on the 27th. We've got a pretty long launch window because we've had things like boats and other things interfere with launch operations, and we want to make sure that with the team up there, we're able to launch it in that window. The payload is a test payload that will be loaded up in the payload bay from the Space Force. It's really there to test the local environments so that when we do our next launch with the Space Force, they'll be able to predict the impact on their satellite. Got it. Wanted to shift to some of the wins that you've announced. For the other Space Force multi-contract OSP-4, could you maybe describe or could you maybe go over what kind of potential contribution, whether it's revenue or backlog contribution from this? From my understanding, it's basically there's several other competing rocket launch companies involved. Just how do we think about that in terms of the impact and either into the backlog or the pipeline? Thanks. Yeah. We are now able to compete for about $1 billion of launch opportunities over the next nine years with the DoD. We are, as you mentioned, one of several companies. Before being awarded this, we couldn't compete for any of that business. While none of that potential $1 billion of launch opportunity is in our backlog today, we'll add it as task orders and as opportunities emerge to serve the Space Force and the DoD. It really just opens up a bunch of additional TAM that was totally closed to us prior to being included in the OSP-4 contract. Understood. Do you have any sort of initial expectations on what you could possibly win? Obviously, there's a lot of other players. Any kind of initial thoughts about what is winnable in that of the 18 or 20 missions? Well, I think we've, as you've seen, won some pretty exciting contracts with NASA back to back, and we hope that there will be many opportunities to serve the Space Force under that contract. I think it's too early to say until we start to have the opportunity to put in for some of these opportunities and start winning some of the task orders that could be issued under that contract. It's hard to say. There continues to be a lot of opportunities for small satellite payloads coming out of the DoD, and this vehicle now allows Astra to participate in delivering those to space. Gotcha. Just one last one from me, I'll jump back in the queue. The Spire contract, any more details you could provide there? Is it just one launch? Anything about how heavy that payload could be going up next year? Yeah. What we can say is it's the Spire spacecraft that have been launched on some of our competitors, and we're now going to be helping them get the existing spacecraft that they have into space. It will be for launches beginning in the spring of next year. I think the contract provides some flexibility for it to be more than one launch. What we announced today was that we're going to kick things off early next year with the launch of one of their spacecraft. Great. Thanks for the insights. Our next question comes from Pete Skibitski with Alembic Global. Hey, good afternoon, guys. Echo the sentiment, congratulations on being a public company. I guess, Chris, to start off, if we assume that the first Rocket 3.3 flight is successful relatively soon, would you expect to be able to do maybe one per month the balance of this year in terms of additional launches, or is that contingent on other factors? Well, we remain on plan to hit our target of doing a total of three launches this year. Whether they'll be exactly 30 days apart or not will really be up to when the range and when we can get up there and perform the launches. What I can say is the rockets are being produced now. They're coming together on our production line. We are scheduled to launch this rocket and two more before the end of the year. Are they both going to be 3.3 or newer rockets? Just curious. We know. We, I believe, have also shared that our intent is to manufacture about 12 of these version three rockets. We will be attempting to achieve this monthly launch rate in the Q4 of this year. Starting to launch at a monthly cadence remains the plan. Okay. Got it. Next question. I'm wondering just kind of you guys with the rates that you are foreseeing, how do you kind of judge the gaining the necessary regulatory approvals to hit these higher rates, especially as you get to maybe like the back half of 2022? How much of a challenge do you think it's going to be to get the necessary regulatory approvals, not just national approvals, but local approvals? You mentioned even things like boat issues around Kodiak. Can you kind of walk us through your plans with that regard? There's really a couple of parts to that. Part one is, in our most recent launches, because the rockets are really similar, they're increasingly becoming batched in our licenses. We can launch several on a single license. We'll be moving to working with the FAA to secure a launch operator's license, which will allow us to, as long as there's no material change to the rocket or the space port, perform a number of launches under the same launch license. The second part to your question is our team remains very focused on working to establish several more space ports. We're working hard both here in the United States and abroad to identify and secure and work through the regulatory process for a number of additional government, commercial, private, international, and in the future, ocean-based space platforms, which will give us a tremendous amount of flexibility that we'll need in order to support the daily space delivery goal that we have in 2025. I see. Okay. That's great, Kemp. I appreciate it. One last one from me. I'm intrigued about this whole kind of rideshare versus direct-to-orbit kind of debate, let's call it, maybe. You see SpaceX continuing to get rideshare missions. On the other hand, both Planet and Spire kind of lining up with you as well. My question is, would you say with regard to Planet and Spire, they're kind of opening the door for you, and should you be successful on some of your initial launches with them, that could lead to much larger opportunities with those guys? Is that a fair way to characterize it? Well, I think that if a large rocket happens to be going exactly where you want to go, exactly when you want to get there, it's kind of like if a ferry or if a large triple seven happens to be leaving, it's great. A lot of our customers value how quickly they can deploy a particular asset, and also exactly where they want to go. I think that if you put the value of the time and potentially the services that they're able to provide to their customers into perspective, Astra's actually very affordable because you're not waiting for six months either for a launch or waiting for 6 months once you're already in space to get to the exact orbit or altitude where you need to be to perform the service for your end users. I think our customers are smart, and they look at the total economic cost of some of these larger launches. I think that really explains why we continue to win contracts. Fair enough. I appreciate the color. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Again, ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question or a comment at this time, please press the star then the one key on your touchtone telephone. Our next question comes from Suji Desilva with Roth Capital. Hi, Chris. Hi, Kelyn. Congratulations on completing the merger and becoming public. In the prepared remarks, you talked about metrics there. I just want to get a quick check on that. The backlog of launch is 50 and the contract revenue $150 million. I wanted to check if that was all similar to what you had said previously, if there's anything incremental there, and if not, what frequency would you be updating that metric just so we can understand going forward? I think I'll take it and then I'll pass it back over to Chris. As I think about coming into this, we've indicated that we have about $150 million in contracted revenue. Our pipeline continues to grow. Our backlog continues to grow. As we look forward, we will be thinking about what we want to disclose and when we want to disclose. What I can tell you is backlog is growing and so is the pipeline. Okay, Kelyn. Thank you. Very helpful. Looking at the kind of customers, kind of elaborating on the last caller's questions. A customer like Planet or Spire, how should we think, Chris, about how Astra's business versus other competitors' business with them might break out? Would it be by something like payload size, or would it just be diversification of risk, or would they be alternating? Just give us a sense maybe of how you might picture those customers divvying out their business, or perhaps all of its available to you, and if you prove out your model, maybe it can shift over to you. Any thoughts there would be helpful. I think when you look at the payloads from the customers we've announced, we can fly all of their payloads. I don't think any customer wants to be in a position where they're depending on any 1 launch service provider. Whether that's a startup or even a large mega constellation, what we're hearing is that customers, they don't want to get locked into a single provider. They want to have two or even three different providers. Launches are often delayed, and in particular, large launch vehicles are really delayed because of factors that are beyond the control of even the launch provider themselves. If there's a delay to the large spacecraft that is the primary customer for that rideshare, it can often delay dozens of small companies that are trying to develop new capabilities. Astra gives you that ability to own your outcome. We're able to put a payload exactly where it needs to go on an exact schedule, and customers value that. Our goal is to try to do that and then do it again and again and again and really establish credibility with our customers. I think that'll just make it easier for us to win business in the future. We're just getting started. Okay, Chris. It's a very helpful color. Thank you. My last question really is around the acquisition to Apollo Fusion. I know it's only been a few weeks even perhaps that you've acquired it, but I'm curious if the customer conversations have started morphing a bit given that you have this capability, whereas you didn't have before. I'm curious. Any changes there in how the customers are approaching you? Thanks. Yeah, it's a great question. I would say that the conversations we're having with customers are deeper and more strategic than they ever have been before. This technology is a critical component in many of the large mega constellations. It gives us a new opportunity to serve our customers. It, of course, is a new capability for our own system, that will allow us to take payloads out to places we could never reach before. Again, it's increasing our TAM considerably. Okay, thanks. Again, congratulations to you and the team. Our next question comes from Austin Moeller with Canaccord. Hi, guys. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, Austin. Just a quick question here. Obviously, you guys have a good amount of cash on the balance sheet now, and so I'm just thinking, following the Apollo Fusion acquisition, is there an interest here in conducting future M&A to further diversify the business? Obviously, we look at competitors like Firefly. They're branching out into moon landers and space transfer vehicles and other platforms, and Rocket Lab is, of course, working on their Photon satellite bus platform. Is there an intent to do some M&A activity maybe here in the near future to expand the product offerings? Yeah. I think that's a great question. We see the opportunity with being a public company as a way to accelerate our business plan. Where there are core technologies that will make our product better in some dimension, lower cost, more efficient to operate, higher performance, we have a choice. We can either hire people and develop that capability, we can potentially license technology, we can buy those components, which is almost never the right thing to do because it's very expensive to buy things from this aerospace supply chain, or we can make acquisitions. I think that we look at each of those very carefully, and in some cases, you'll see us acquire companies, in some cases, you'll see us hire people, and in some cases, you'll see us license things. I think that what we're here to do is not expand, but focus. We have a huge backlog. We have a lot of customers that are relying on us to increase our launch rate. Our focus with this capital and the ability to consider transactions like this will be to accelerate revenues, not expand what we're offering. Okay, great. Thank you for the color. I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Chris Kemp for any closing remarks. Yeah, no, I really appreciate everyone's participation today, and we're really excited to have this new forum to share what we're working on with you all and look forward to an exciting quarter ahead and getting back together with you all next quarter. Participation today, and we'll see you all in the near future. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's presentation. You may now disconnect and have a wonderful day.