Good day, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the AST SpaceMobile Fourth Quarter 2022 Business Update call. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your host today, Scott Wisniewski, Chief Strategy Officer of AST SpaceMobile. Please go ahead. Thank you and good morning, everyone. Let me refer you to slide two of the presentation, which contains our safe harbor disclaimer. During today's call, we may make certain forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and as a result are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements on this call. For more information about these risks and uncertainties, please refer to the Risk Factors section of AST SpaceMobile's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year that ended December 31st, 2022, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other documents filed by AST SpaceMobile with the SEC from time to time. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and the company specifically disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements that may be discussed during the call. Also, after our initial remarks, we will be starting our Q&A section with questions submitted in advance by our shareholders. Now, referring to slide three, for those of you who may be new to our company and our mission, there are over 5 billion mobile phones in use today around the world, but many of us still experience gaps in coverage as we live, work and travel. With this, AST SpaceMobile is building the first and only global cellular broadband network in space to operate directly with standard unmodified mobile phones based on our extensive IP and patent portfolio. Our engineers and space scientists are on a mission to eliminate the connectivity gaps faced by today's 5 billion mobile subscribers and finally bring broadband to the billions who remain unconnected. With that, it is my pleasure to now pass it over to Chairman and CEO, Abel Avellan. Thank you, Scott. Good morning, everybody. Very glad to be updating you on what has happened since our last call. Before I start, I want to remind everybody that we're currently operating the first and only satellite designed to deliver space-based cellular broadband with the largest ever communication array deployed commercially in low Earth orbit. It's a monumental achievement. We're very proud of it. We're also currently testing BlueWalker 3. With the test that we have done so far, we have successfully validated key technologies to deliver cellular broadband directly to standard unmodified phones. We also have took significant steps to further industrialize our technology with in-house manufacturing of key components and electronics and secure launch services for our next five satellites. We continue to progress the path to commercialize our services with customers, partners, and regulators on a global basis. Let me take you to page five. With BlueWalker 3, since we have it in orbit, it had orbited the Earth successfully more than 2,000 times. The pictures that you see here are the satellite unfold, fold before its launch. In the bottom you see the satellite unfold on the Earth, then the satellite fold in space. This is basically around 695 sq ft structure flying around the Earth and pointing to the ground at around 70,000 miles per hour. Our ability to manage it, control it, terminally control it and fly it is very important, and that has been a major step in our technology. Where are we with testing BlueWalker 3? First of all, I'm very happy to announce that initial test results indicate that the downlink signal strength necessary to reach 5G cellular broadband speed can be met with our technology. We also have demonstrated our ability to deploy the largest ever communication array deployed into low Earth orbit. We have demonstrated our ability to fly, control, and fly our satellite with the array fully deployed with a size of 693 sq ft. We have demonstrated our patented technology that validates Doppler and delay compensation, a key component, a key patented component to be able to do 5G speeds. We continue to target to complete cellular broadband speeds directly to standard or modified phones. Page seven. Update on the industrialization of our patented technology. We continue to invest in our facilities around the globe with our focus in our facilities in Texas. We have ramped up our initial manufacturing facility, starting with the capability of two satellites per month, ramping up to six satellites per month. We continue to have two main facilities in Texas in order to produce our flight satellites. Progress on key commercialization milestones. We continue our customer momentum. We have signed seven new MOUs, including Saudi Telecom and Zain in Saudi Arabia. We also have announced plans to explore potential opportunities to market our services to the military and defense market. We continue to formalize our constellation plans. We have signed an agreement with NASA. In order to protect both of our assets by signing the Space Act Agreement, we have secured our launch agreement for our next Block 1 satellite, but also we are in negotiations for our subsequent launches after our first Block satellites. We're also driving U.S. regulatory framework. We have participated in the initial FCC ruling related to Supplemental Coverage from Space, which will allow satellite operator to collaborate with terrestrial service provider to expand coverage to terrestrial licensees and subscribers. With that, I want to pass it to Scott. He'll talk about our next key milestones to reach a space-based cellular broadband commercial services. Thank you, Abel. Looking ahead, we want to summarize the key future milestones we're tracking ahead of initial space-based cellular broadband commercial service. First, we'll look to publish joint test results of BlueWalker 3's capabilities with our MNO customers and technology partners. We'll also be looking to manufacture and assemble the Block 1 BlueBird satellites at our Texas facilities. Alongside these steps, we'll also be pursuing the completion of definitive commercial agreements with initial customers and regulatory approvals in key markets. For our Block 2 program, we'll be looking to finalize the design, including doing ASIC tape-out, and then we'll be looking to launch our five Block 1 BlueBird satellites leading into initial commercial service using those Block 1 satellites. I'd like to hand the conversation over to our CFO, Sean Wallace. Thanks, Scott. Good morning, everyone. The fourth quarter was another busy three months for AST. Beyond operational execution, including the unfolding of the largest commercial communications array ever deployed in low Earth orbit, we also continue to march forward with our plans to become an integrated manufacturer, assembler, integrator, and tester of our own satellites. Our Site Two facility in Texas has been transformed into a giant clean manufacturing space with an increasing set of sophisticated equipment and a growing team that will turn components into satellites. The finance area, we were also active as we demonstrated continued access to capital by raising over $85 million in equity in the fourth quarter, where we welcomed new investors and raised important capital for the company. We remain focused on building a constellation designed to erase those mobile phone dead zones that we all suffer through, and providing the productivity-enhancing technology of mobile communications to currently unconnected people across the globe. Let me move on to a discussion about some of our key operating metrics that are presented on slide 10. Looking at the first chart, we see for the fourth quarter of 2022, we had non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses of $39.1 million versus $38.5 million in the third quarter. Non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses exclude non-cash operating costs, including depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation totaling $3.6 million for both the third and the fourth quarters. Our fourth quarter non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses increased by $0.6 million versus the third quarter. As expected, our research and development expenses increased again this quarter, mostly as a result of the achievement of certain milestones in our projects, which brought forward certain milestone payments. Our R&D expenses consist principally of non-recurring development activities for which we typically engage third-party vendors, and payments are based on completion of milestones. Our other components of non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses, namely engineering services and G&A, are expected to remain in about the same range for the next two quarters and will trend up slightly over time as a result of our commercialization efforts. We currently expect that the level of non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses will remain in the high 30s for at least two more quarters as we continue to pursue important R&D projects for our BlueBird satellites and decline to the low 30s thereafter. Turning towards the second chart, our capital expenditures for the fourth quarter were $10.4 million versus $11.3 million for the third quarter and $30.3 million for the full year. We expect that our levels of capital expenditures, which include direct material expenditures and launch costs for satellites, as well as capital improvements for our manufacturing facilities and ground infrastructure, will increase. As disclosed in our 10-K, we now estimate that our capital expenditures for our five Block 1 satellites will be between $100 million-$110 million. Our capital expenditures, which have been averaging around $10 million-$11 million per quarter, will begin to increase to fund the development of our Block 1 satellites, which we currently expect to launch in the first quarter of 2024. Our estimates for the capital cost of each of our Block 2 satellites, which includes materials and launch costs, is now $16 million-$18 million. The increase in Block 2 satellite costs versus our previous estimate reflects increases in material costs and a higher estimate for future launch costs. The projected cost of these satellites could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including inflation, supply chain disruptions, design changes, and increases in the cost of electronic components, assembly equipment, launch costs, salaries, and other aspects of our satellite design and assembly activities. Could increase the cost to design, assemble, and launch our satellites. These estimated cost trends are preliminary estimates based on certain assumptions and information currently available to us and are subject to change based on numerous factors described earlier, as well as delays in the development of components and materials, launch costs, and other factors. On the final chart on the slide, we ended the fourth quarter just shy of $240 million in cash on hand, up from approximately $200 million at the end of the third quarter. As we stated in our 10-K, we believe this cash, as well as our ability to raise capital through other existing facilities, is sufficient to support our expenditures for at least the next 12 months. In addition, we continue to evaluate other sources of cash and liquidity to supplement our activities. We understand the capital-intensive nature of our project, and we are highly focused on exploring a wide range of options in order to fund our efforts. As described in our 10-K, a key strategy of AST is to develop our constellation on a modular basis, focusing our satellite capacity on the most attractive commercial markets in conjunction with our mobile network operator partners. I am encouraged by the progress that the team has made, and I'm excited about the company's future as we transition from the development phase to commercial satellite production. Thank you for your continued support of the SpaceMobile mission. With that, I'll turn it back to Scott. Thank you, Sean. Before we go to the queue of analyst questions, we'd like to address a few of the questions submitted ahead of the call by our investors. Operator, could you please start us off with the first question? Bob from Washington asked, "Are you satisfied with where testing progress and timelines are at right now? Thank you, Bob, for the question. Well, we're never satisfied, but we're very, very encouraged by what we have learned so far during the testing. We have validated our architecture end-to-end, and we have validated our ability to provide satellite cellular broadband with our architecture. We have done something that nobody had done before. We have built an infrastructure alongside with this capability. We are also protected with IP, which is very significant. We are also very advanced in our commercialization of our satellites. Fundamentally, we're happy where we are at this point. Jay from California asked, "Where is AST SpaceMobile on the production of the 20 full-size BlueBirds for a functioning constellation? Will the five BW-3-sized satellites to be launched later this year be included in that constellation? Thanks, Jay. That's right. The first Block 1 BlueBirds will not only offer initial services on their own, but we expect their capabilities will be incorporated into the overall constellation as we build it out. Our Block 2 satellites, which will leverage our custom ASIC, they're gonna offer significant upgrade to the RF capabilities versus Block 1. The two networks are designed to be compatible. In terms of timing, we currently plan to launch and deploy Block 2 BlueBird satellites in a phased approach beginning in 2024 after the launch of the Block 1 BlueBird satellites. Luke from Connecticut asked, "How should we think about military use and potential revenue? Thank you, Luke, for the question. First and foremost, I want to reiterate that our focus is providing cellular broadband globally for people that live, work in places where there's no terrestrial connectivity, and that allows us to participate in the $1 trillion wireless market. We think that's our core business, connecting those 5 billion phones that are moving around on connectivity every day. However, we have making considerations to also participate in large government-related opportunities, for both security and defense opportunities, in particular in United States. Jay from California asked, "In our recent economic environment with VC money, capital constraints, and higher interest rates, where does AST SpaceMobile expect to receive funding for the production of the 20 full-size BlueBirds and beyond? Thank you, Jay. As we have stated during our earnings presentation and disclosed in our 10-K, we believe we have enough cash on hand and other resources to fund the next 12 months of operations, including the construction and launch of five Block 1 satellites, which are targeted to be launched in the first quarter of 2024. In addition to this liquidity, we have been working hard to develop other sources of cash and liquidity in order to supplement our future activities, including the construction of 20 BB1 satellites. This activity includes exploring a wide range of instruments, including structured debt, Ex-Im government financings, the public debt markets, the potential to pre-sell capacity to important customers, and selling equity in both private and public transactions. We are optimistic that we have a window of many quarters to determine the best financing alternatives and are hopeful that our access to capital will continue to remain strong, especially if we're able to continue to execute our strategy. With that, I'd like to thank our shareholders for submitting these questions. Operator, let's open the call to analyst questions now. Thank you. We will now open the call for analyst questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. The confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two to remove yourself from the question queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment please, while we poll for your questions. Our first questions come from the line of Mike Crawford with B. Riley. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you for the update this morning. Regarding regulatory framework, what do you want to see from the final report and order from the FCC regarding Supplemental Coverage from Space? Well, thank you for the question. Well, I think that the steps that the FCC has taken are very, very encouraging for our plans. First of all, facilitate the partnership between the retail cellular providers and cellular on the space base system like ours. That, that would provide a framework that will be leading here in the United States. It will facilitate, it will streamline the process that it is at least our expectation. Also, our expectation is that other countries will follow the lead of United States with what the FCC is doing here. We're very pleased with that process. Of course, that process ongoing and actually the actual final shape of that process remain to be seen. we're very encouraged with the initiative of the FCC on the process that they put forward to standardize and facilitate a regulatory framework for system like ours. Okay. Thank you. Do you have any greater understanding of what level of revenue you'll be able to generate with the first five Block 1 satellites, and then separately once you have 20 satellites? Hey, Mike, it's Scott here. you know, we referenced on our milestones page, you know, signing of definitive commercial agreements. we've begun those discussions with initial customers. we're not gonna provide guidance on revenue, of course. The first five satellites, we do believe will have standalone revenue. It's not the focus of course. We're focused on that as a first phase. We do believe there's revenue there, both for service and other related things we can sell to those MNO customers, as they're, and then there's also the government opportunities. Which government market is quite often in the satellite world an early contributor to revenue in the overall company cycle. Between those two, we think there's revenue there. We won't give guidance on how much. On the on the Block 2 BlueBirds, it's, those are the ones that'll get us to a near continuous service and, you know, profitability and cash flow positive. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chris Quilty with Quilty Analytics. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you, gentlemen. I was wondering if you could elaborate on the testing that you did, and specifically pretty encouraging that you're seeing the ability to get to 5G speeds. Just maybe if you can add a little color on how you do that testing and draw that conclusion. Hi, Chris, how are you? Thank you for the question. What we have done so far on our testing indicate to us that we will be able to get to 4G and 5G speeds. We have achieved that. We achieved to get to that conclusion by measuring the signal strength that we're able to get each direction of the connection. We are there downlink, so we know that we will be able to get 5G speeds in our system. More importantly, also, we have validated the whole architecture, including the Doppler and delay compensation. At this point, the end-to-end architecture is validated. We're not done with the testing. We continue steps to be taken. we plan to, in due course, we plan to announce results in conjunction with our telco partners. How would you make that announcement? Would there be a press release or sort of study release? Hey, Chris. We, of course, don't wanna get ahead of that announcement, but we think it's, this is an incredible milestone, not just for us, but you saw our partner post us alongside Alexander Graham Bell. That's perhaps a little strong, but we think this is a very big moment in being able to demonstrate broadband from a satellite directly to an unmodified phone, one of 5 billion in the world. We think that's a very big announcement. That's one worthy of a big announcement. We don't wanna get ahead of that too much, Chris. Okay. Just make sure I get the White House announcement. The other question I had was concerning the agreement, Space Act Agreement with NASA, which is, I'm surprised it slipped by. Those are not necessarily easy to process. When was that concluded, and was there any impacts on operations or how you would operate based upon that agreement? The agreement with NASA, Chris, is basically an agreement to share information of where our assets, our space assets are, where their space assets are. Basically how to manage information between us. Basically simply to facilitate the operation of our constellation. We don't see any particular change in how we're planning to operate. There have been significant learnings of how to actually do this with successfully flying, in essence, what is the largest communication array ever deployed into LEO. This is just simply one step into how to industrialize and continue to add satellites as we build them. Chris, we put that press release out, right before the holidays, December 16th. Snuck it out. Well, good. Congratulations. Final question, can you elaborate what you're seeing in the launch market? Obviously, the big 83 launch order that Amazon placed last year has put some constraint on the heavy lift market. Are you still targeting Falcon Heavy as a primary launch vehicle waiting for Starship, or are there other alternatives? Chris, as you probably know, we already secure our next launch with a Falcon 9 for the next five satellites in a single launch. We also announced that we are we're leaving our options open. There is a significant amount of new entries into the market that start coming up in 2024, 2025. We are evaluating and we're working with basically all of them that have the ability to launch more than 10 tons into space with a single launch. Very good. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question has come from the line of Mathieu Robilliard with Barclays. Please proceed with your questions. Good morning, all, and congratulations on all the progress. I had a few questions. The first one is around regulation, and there was a question about the FCC, but I was also interested to know what progress you've been making in terms of getting regulatory approval in other markets. There's also news about the German regulator reportedly asking you for cutting the signal once you cover the EC or Europe at this stage. I don't know if there's any comment that you want to make about that. That would be my first question. Great. Good morning, Mathieu. Scott here. On the global progress with regulatory, the U.S. has been the one that's had the most significant movement this quarter. Of course, that's why we've profiled it, we think the U.S. is, you know, most important market in the world and one that we're very happy is taking a constructive approach. Globally, you know, we've had several licenses for both 3GPP and V-band in place for some time now in about six markets globally. We have many other regulatory conversations going on. It's a little more traditional for markets to progress closer to service, so we expect more movement on that as the year progresses. We've also been really focused on test licenses. Some of that's not public. Some of it's done behind the scenes before it's granted, we've been prepping test licenses, of course, so that we can continue our BlueWalker 3 test campaign through the course of the year. That's, you know, good signals there. Nothing's really changed. The receptivity we get from regulators is, it's pretty positive based on the increased attention that non-terrestrial has gotten the last couple of years. Others have kind of done that spade work for us. The fact that this is just a great outcome for regulators, right? It's using existing assets more efficiently. It's connecting the unconnected. It's resolving political objectives country by country by country. I think globally we still feel good. The second part of your question, Germany. We were not contacted by the German regulator on that topic, so I don't think we have any other further comments that we've not filed for approval in Germany. Great. That's very clear. I had the question about the testing, I don't know how much you want or can share at this stage, but to understand a bit what are the next milestones in terms of what you need to test and working on testing with BlueWalker 3 with the uplink. I don't know if you can share any sense of timing, in terms of, you know, how long could this take? Right. I think the key thing that, you know, we try to emphasize was the validation of the end-to-end architecture, right? That's key because the reason why this challenge has not been solved before and why we think others will struggle to solve it in a meaningful way is because there's a lot of components of end-to-end architecture. Being able to transmit and do that initial end-to-end testing was a real key validation for us as well as flying the satellite and mechanical unfolding. Having those in our back pocket and getting the initial signal strength test that Abel pointed to on the downlink was very encouraging for us. These are things that are happening in real time. This is something that's never been done before and is pass by pass every 90 minutes, you know, we make advancements. We see the pieces and the testing continues for now. Thank you. Maybe a last question in terms of the CapEx per and specifically the unit cost of the BlueBird satellites. I know you said in the past that the next batch of satellites could have something more homogeneous and more scalable in terms of the production. I was wondering if that was still how you thought about it and future satellites unit cost could in theory be a bit lower than the ones of BlueBird 5... Oh, sorry, BlueBird 1. Do you want to take that, Scott? Yeah, please. The range of our estimates for the, for the first sets of satellites went from $15 million-$17 million to $16 million-$18 million, about a 6% increase. A lot of that increase is a function of some changes in some of our estimates of what we think our launch vehicle costs will be. Candidly, we have tried to be very conservative on what we think our material costs will be, as well as our launch costs. We've basically predicted our costs based on current costs for our materials and for launches. We agree with you that over time, we're gonna continue to see hopefully very, very rapid reductions in the cost per kilograms for launch vehicles, as well as the benefits of scale in our manufacturing and purchasing capabilities to bring that number down. We are trying to be conservative, and so we're just using sort of near line of sight to provide you that estimate. Hopefully, will be good news if we get better scale and better costs on launch vehicles. Great. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question has come from the line of Bryan Kraft with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your questions. Hi, good morning. I had a few, if you don't mind. I guess, first, I wanna just ask you what regions will the Block 1 and Block 2 satellites cover? I'm assuming that will be equatorial regions, but wanted to see how you're thinking about that. Maybe I'll throw the second one in at the same time, which is, at this point, when do you expect revenue to really begin to ramp in a meaningful way? Is that maybe early 2025 after, you know, the first 25 satellites in orbit and operating, or, you know, will it take longer before we start to see that ramp up? Thanks, Bryan. I'll jump in first. In terms of initial markets for Block 1, we have not announced that. The reason why is believe it or not, you can actually change that, the, where the satellites focus, you know, pretty late in the cycle because it's just a matter of inclination that you launch into. Of course, we have a pretty good sense and the U.S. market is the most valuable telecom market in the world. That's a decision and prioritization that is, will be made with our partners, and there'll be strategic considerations. Those initial markets for Block 1 we expect will service globally in some way. Yeah, we expect revenue on those for sure. In terms of revenue ramp, you know, the Block 1 revenue will be a 2024 event, and then the Block 2 revenue will continue to ramp alongside it. For us, it's important that, you know, we're not selling services based on satellites. We're selling services based on capabilities and coverage. As we start to put agreements in place, they'll kind of they'll forecast the expectation of additional coverage and additional capabilities, and we'll be able to leg into that kind of automatically or as we go. Really, 2024 for initial revenue from Block 1, and Block 2, we'll chase as quickly as we can. Well, maybe just, I mean, without getting into specific markets, I guess one thing I just wanted to understand is, you know, there's really two types of markets, right? There's Western markets where you're providing fill-in coverage for people primarily who are roaming off the grid. Then there are markets where you're providing primary broadband service, right? Because there's not terrestrial service available, which I think is a big part of your mission. I guess I was just curious as to whether the first two blocks of satellites, you know, will focus on providing, you know, that primary broadband service, or if it'll be more in the developed markets like the U.S., where, you know, you're providing, complimentary service to terrestrial networks. Yeah. We are taking a pragmatic and a strategic approach where we focus these satellites, and that depends on the agreements that we have. I mean, obviously, our ability to provide connectivity for both type of markets. Developed markets, where people most of the time have connectivity, but moving in and out of connectivity when it's hiking or in a road that do not have connectivity or simply driving between New York and the Hamptons and hit where there's no connectivity. As you indicated, also developing countries where people work and live in places where there's no broadband connectivity at all. We approach it both. The ARPU of the developed market is higher. The U.S. market is the largest telco market in the world. We are taking decisions on where we focus these initial assets as per the agreement that we are working, negotiating with our telco partners. To answer your question, it will be driven by the commercial agreements that we're negotiating. Got it. That makes sense. My other question is, you know, on the financing side, what's the potential for securing financing through one or more of your MNO partners? I mean, with so many large, well-funded partners, you know, you wouldn't need a lot of participation, among companies to make a modest investment, you know, to finish the build-out or at least get you through, you know, the next phase on the Block 2 satellites. I guess I was wondering how realistic that might be as an option. Maybe that plays into some of the prioritization discussion too, about where you focus first. No, I think. I- Yeah. You're absolutely right. That the we're strategic for our telco partners. We actually partner with them in solving a major problem for them, which is coverage, and specifically the coverage that become more expensive for them, which is that last portion of their territories where there's no broadband services. We will explore that as much as we can, and we will work with them as we have been working since inception. That's what we working with our existing shareholders and strategic partners as part of our development of our constellation. Do you want to add something there, Sean? It sounded like you were trying to jump in. No, I think Abel said it best. I mean, I think as we move along and de-risk this business, it's very clear in our conversations with our MNO partners that this is a business that attacks their capital expenditure problems. They need to build fewer towers. They probably need to buy less spectrum, and they're gonna help their ARPU, which all will drive their return on invested capital. It's a very interesting business that's complementary to their existing platform and is gonna enable them to grow without having to spend a lot of money. We do agree with you that over time, as we de-risk and prove the technology, that there's gonna be a lot of, we hope there will be a lot of companies that will be very interested in investing alongside us. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Landon Park with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your questions. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking the questions. I'm wondering if we can just start off on, you know, the testing you mentioned. Can you maybe just define, you know, what 5G speed, you know, sort of means, when you're talking about that? Is the testing indicating that you'll have a reliable enough connection for consistent voice services as well? Well, first of all, when we refer to 5G, we refer to what the FCC basically state as 5G. 5G or 4G speeds. So that what we use as a reference. Is that, what, 30 Mbps or? In that order, yes. In order to provide broadband directly to a handset, you need to have the ability to calibrate, beamform, track, Doppler and delay compensate, which we do with our patented approach to do that directly to a regular handset. At this moment, we have all the evidence that we get enough signal strength to achieve that. But as I said before, we are not completed. We still steps to finish to do that end-to-end connectivity to reform, but we have basically validated the whole architecture at this point. And yes, this will support voice, multi, text, data, video streaming and anything that you can do with a 5G device on a terrestrial architecture. Of course, with the limitations of our wireless infrastructure and obviously, that capacity need to be administrated carefully in order to maximize the number of users per satellites. In principle, we estimate that we will be able to support all applications that you currently have on terrestrial networks. Understood. Yeah, talking about the BlueBirds, I think you previously indicated that you expect the full size production satellites to have 9-13 Gb of capacity. You know, has the testing given any indications of potential upside or downside versus those numbers that you had previously given? Well, I mean, the first Block 1, they are the same size of BlueWalker 3. They are FPGAs. The next generation, the Block 2s are our ASIC base. We have done tremendous amount of progress on that. We will be taping out that ASIC pretty soon, and we estimate a tenfold increase in capacity per satellite when we incorporate the ASIC into our technology. Our testing at this point have been mostly focused in BlueWalker 3 and basically enabling end-to-end connectivity with all the impairment that a LEO system will have, which is the core of our technology. Understood. Is the 9-13 Gb for the full size ASIC-based satellites, is that still the right range we should be thinking about? Yes. Just the last one for me. I'm wondering if you've had any discussions with MSS spectrum license holders for potential partnership. You know, I think there's certain obvious benefits to having a global unified band that can potentially be embedded in smartphones moving forward. Have you given any thoughts to potentially pursuing a partnership along those lines? Well, what I can say at this moment, our satellite has the ability to support both 3GPP and MSS spectrum. We have designed that from the very beginning. Both our ASICs and our antennas, our transmitters, our receivers, which take years to develop, they already incorporate that capability for a multitude of bands. No one in particular. Our view is that the real business and the biggest potential, it is reusing spectrum from the MNO for a very, very simple reason. There is gigahertz of capacity or spectrum allocated to cellular, and a very few tens of megahertz allocated to MSS. Our view is focused on 3GPP spectrum that we reuse from terrestrial in a shared matter or in a dedicated matter in order to assure a week of connectivity per country. Having said that doesn't discard our capacity or our ability to also overlay MSS spectrum to what we believe is the core and the most important market, which is reusing 3GPP spectrum. Just to follow up there. When we think about use cases in terms of potentially being fringe use cases in populated suburban areas where there are still dead spots, but they're relatively small, would you be able to use carrier spectrum in small dead spots like that, or will it create interference issues with the terrestrial networks? Yes. We had an approach with the 3GPP spectrum, which is shared with terrestrial. That one of the big advantages of having a very large array allowed us to geographically distinct and reuse the spectrum, so we don't need dedicated spectrum on a national basis. We can parse it out by regions, by cells, by beams. Then we work with the operators in basically a frequency plan that allowed us to cover the very small, these very small holes in the network, as well as the very large holes in the network. That's the way how we do it. Of course, we do it this in complete coordination and with the cellular operator, which is at the end the holder of the spectrum. I mean, how small, I mean, are those? I mean, some of these gaps are very small and in relatively populated suburban areas. How tight can you get your beam-? Yes. in terms of filling in some of those gaps? Yes. It is not only by separating through the beams. Our beams you know, get to around 24 kilometers, and that's a matter of 24 or 12, depending on the band. And then if the gaps are smaller than that, then basically it's a frequency plan coordination that is done together with the operator. It's basically orthogonal spectrum into those areas. When we think about it, we think about it 3GPP dedicated spectrum and 3GPP non-dedicated or shared spectrum. Both 3GPP spectrum, already owned and operated by the operators. Under that scenario, the operator would have to vacate certain frequencies in those small pockets on a wider basis in order to allow you to operate, right? Is that allowed under the way the FCC rules are being written? Yes. That's our expectation. Is that how it would function? Yes. That's our expectation. Okay. Our expectation is that the operators with our system, they will be able to, in the most efficient way that exists today, given the size of our arrays, we'll be able to share a spectrum, in a dedicated or a shared matter in order to cover every single gap in their correspondent territory. Great. Thank you. Thank you. At this time, I'm showing no further questions. I would now like to turn the call back over to Scott Wisniewski for any closing remarks. Thank you, everyone. Our company is building the first and only space-based cellular broadband network. It's designed for use with the phone in your pocket today. We're very excited for the path ahead for AST SpaceMobile. Thank you to our shareholders and analysts for the questions. Have a great weekend, everybody. Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.