Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to first quarter 2026 earnings call. This conference is being recorded, and the replay will be available at the company's website at auraminerals.com/investors. The presentation will also be available for download. This call is also available in Portuguese. To access, you can press the globe icon on the lower right side of your Zoom screen and then choose to enter the Portuguese room. After that, select Mute Original Audio. [Non-English content] We would like to inform that all attendees will only be listening to the conference during the presentation, and then we will start the question and answer section when further instructions will be provided. Before proceeding, we would like to clarify that any statements that may be made during this conference call regarding the company's business prospects, operational and financial projections and goals are the beliefs and assumptions of Aura executive board and the current information available to the company. These statements may involve risks and uncertainties as they relate to future events and therefore depend on circumstances that may or may not occur. Investors should be aware of events related to the macroeconomic scenario, the industry, and other factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the respective forward-looking statements. Present at this conference, we have Rodrigo Barbosa, President and CEO, and Kleber Cardoso, CFO. Now, I will turn the conference over to Rodrigo Barbosa. You may begin your conference, sir. Sure. Thank you. Thank you all for this first quarter of the year. As always, I'll be talking about summary of the results and strategic moments during this quarter. Kleber will follow with more detailed information about the financials and cash flows. Before I start, I think I would be good to recap that this was a very solid quarter for us, where I can show to you that we move forward under the three avenues that we propose to deliver value to our shareholders. This story has been shared in the market since 2020 and reinforced since the Nasdaq listing last year. We're gonna build value to our shareholder by three different avenues. Number one, we're gonna increase production. We're gonna co-develop Greenfield project and reach over 600,000 ounces with after all the parts are developed. Number two, we still have a significant area unexplored and room to increase life of mine. We should also see together with improvement and increase in production, a significant increase in resources and reserves along our the next years. Number three, we should tackle also our price per NAV multiple through growth and also improving our daily trading volume to the market. What I'm gonna share with you during the next few slides is consolidates quarter that consolidates solid steps towards these three avenues. If we jump into the first slide. In summary, again, we reached a new record high production as we already disclosed to the market. Of course, now including MSG acquisition that was last year, including only in December, reaching 82.1 thousand ounces of gold equivalent ounces. That together with the higher gold prices summed at $380 million in terms of revenues. Now, when we add comparing to first quarter last year, Borborema, that was still beginning to ramp up. Now full year of Borborema, stable productions in our mines, plus MSG, and higher gold prices, we see the EBITDA 3x higher than the first quarter last year, now reaching $244 million, another record high EBITDA for the quarter. Together with our EBITDA, we can see the All-in Sustaining Cash Costs, which in $1,829. This is a significant increase compared to last quarters, mostly because of now we are consolidating MSG. As we disclosed to the market since early stage during the acquisitions, we understand that MSG has a higher All-in Sustaining Cash Cost and will be higher during this year once we are focused on the turnaround, preparing the mine and to put the production levels above 80 or close to 80,000 ounces, and All-in Sustaining Cash Costs close to $2,000. During this first quarter and actually during the second quarter, also, we should see MSG with a high All-in Sustaining Costs when we are focusing on our underground preparation, underground safety standards, underground development, so that we can prepare this mine for a better production throughout the Q3 and then Q4 and actually, and even better than next year. I will talk mine by mine and then following slides. Higher EBITDA also translated in the strong recurring free cash flow, now reaching $95 million, which is 109% higher compared to last quarter. This strong recurring cash flow, $95 million, stronger even after a payment of $33 million on hedges due to the Borborema, which is a non-recurring, but should happen this year and should also happen next year. A temporary working capital consumption of $42 million. Kleber is going to walk you through in more details about the transition from EBITDA all the way to free cash flow. In terms of net debt, super stable despite the payment of $55 million during the quarter regarding the last quarter of last year. Investment also in production. We saw a company that has been able to grow and pay solid dividends to our dividends while maintaining a very low net debt to EBITDA ratio. As we are stable in net debt and the EBITDA continue to increase, you'll see the leverage of the company actually being deleveraged after all the growth acquisitions, payment dividends and strong results from our mines. In terms of net income, as now we see, unfortunately this quarter there was not a significant higher gold price as we were seeing in the last quarters along the year 2025. That translates into lower mark-to-market losses in terms of the whole gold hedges. That translating some $95 million of net income. Kleber also gonna walk you through in more detail how we got to the $95 and also see what would be the adjusted net income without the non-recurring events. As we continue to grow EBITDA, we have no leverage and margins are continue to improve. We see a room to maintain a high level of dividends to our shareholders. Another record high dividends now reaching $65 million of dividends or $0.76 per share. When you add the dividends we paid in Q2 last year, Q3, Q4, and now this Q4, we see that the last 12 months on the quarterly basis reaching 4.6% of dividend yield. As we progress in the production, as we progress during the second semester, we're gonna see a higher production compared to the first semester. We need to think that we can continue to distribute a significant amount of dividends to our shareholder without jeopardizing the growth plan that we have. As additional events and that will reinforce the three pillars that I was mentioned to you earlier this call, we see that our Sorry. That our growth plan continue to be super solid. Number 1, we got the agreement signed by Denis to move a road that unlocked significant amount of resource and reserves in Borborema, increasing the life of mine to 36 years now. Of course, We prefer to have a lower life of mine and higher production. That's why we've been disclosing to the market that we are now finalizing all the studies to increase significantly the production of Borborema, so that that can actually then stretch a little bit more and decrease the life of mine with increased production of Borborema. We are finalizing all the studies and should we have any news to the market between now Q2 or Q3 this year. Very important milestone is that we updated our resources and reserves on the report 20-F. That was a significant addition of reserves, adding 3.8 million ounces of proven and probable, and also reaching, when you add proven and probable also with the Measured and Indicated, you're gonna see that you can get close to 10 million ounces in our inventory for the long days. That's a significant increase compared to what we had before. While we continue to do exploration investments and see also room for further improvement in our resource and reserves as we move along the next years. Very important project for Era Dorada. Early this year, as we shared with the market, we got the license to initiate the construction. That was followed by a full board approval to initiate the construction of Era Dorada. We are in full force for the year. CapEx will be divided between this year and next year, I expect production to come now in 2028. We talked about how we increase production. Now go back to the other slide. We talked about that we increased production with Last year we had the Borborema ramp up. Actually this quarter we continued to increase a little bit more in terms of production. That's the growth this year. We come from last year of 284,000 ounces of production. This year the guidance is between 340-390. We continue to grow by developing the project and doing acquisitions. Second, we increased significantly our resource and reserve. Third, to tackle the current NAV, we know that we had to address dedicated volume combined with a solid walking the talk and delivering on the projects and growth. We could see that Aura is narrowing a little bit the gap. Our price per NAV, while you still have a lot of room to continue to narrow this gap as we are maintaining a high daily trading volume and continue to grow. There is a very strong correlation between size and price per NAV in the gold sector as we come from, in the past 200,000 ounces of production, now on guidance 340 and 390. We know how to get close to 600. We should see this continue narrowing the gap of price per NAV. One of the factors as being well accepted by the market and widely amplified when we listed in Nasdaq is that we are now trading $94 million. That was the daily trading volume on the last average on last quarter. Compared to last quarter of last year, $31 million. If I remind investors that where we were one year ago, it was $2 million per day. Now we are on average $94 million per day, which is now attracting very large and more sophisticated investors that now pay attention to our and now also invest in our portfolio. Next slide. In terms of safety, after a long time without any lost time incident, unfortunately, we had a lost time incident in Borborema, that was on a maintenance on the filter. We are reinforcing all the procedures. There was not followed some of the procedures, so we are reinforcing training, all the managers and all the maintenance team in order to follow the procedures and reinforcing the standards. This person is already back to work. There's no major injury. However, there was some lost time incident related to that accident. In terms of stability of structures, again, all geotechnical structures are in satisfactory level. On the left side of this slide, we can clearly see on the line, the left side shows the last 12 months of production as we are now increasing, getting, from the standard of between 60- 70,000 ounces of production that happened during the 2024, 2025. Now with Borborema and then MSG, we are now increasing to levels above 80,000 ounces and perhaps reach close to 90,000 ounces, even above during the second semester, which is now the last 12 months, ramping up our production coming from 265, that was on Q3, 2015, 280, 302. We should see these last 12 months continue to increase as we are very comfortable, in line with the guides that we set to the market to finish the year between 340,000 and 390,000 ounces of productions. In terms of mine by mine, where we saw, which was expected and due to mine sequencing, due to the budget and the guidance that we sent to the market. Aranzazu, we will now going to lower grades through this quarter. We should not expect a significant improvement through the second quarter and then some improvement during the second semester in Aranzazu. That's the same that happens in Apoena, that Apoena can relate it to other years, where we start the year, normally is slower, and then production pick up during the third and fourth quarter. Minosa, super stable. It's just a rounding number here from 18 to 17, but it's actually 2% of decrease compared to Q4, and we should continue to see stable production in Minosa and perhaps some improvement during the second semester. Almas, we continue to have a strong production at 15,000, 16,000 production and implementing an investment where we are increasing the capacity of Almas to reach up to 3 million tons per year by the end of the year. While we are doing underground development so that we can, along the next year, continue to improve efficiency and also production in the project, while exploration efforts on the near mine and on the regional continue to give us a strong and strong indicators that this mine is not only going to have a very extended life of mine, but be able to even expand above the 3 million tons per year. Borborema, we had a stronger quarter compared to last quarter, mainly due to a higher throughput, the stabilization of the milling process, stabilization of the filter, but there's still some room to improve production for the second semester. MSG, this increase is mainly due to we are now consolidated three months compared to December last year, there was only one month. We should not expect MSG to improve. Actually, we expect MSG to decrease production during the second quarter while we are totally focused building infrastructure underground in order to prepare this mine to do the proper production for the 27-year. But we should see on Q3 and Q4 productivity improving, costs going down, and also production going up, but not on the second quarter. Next. In terms of our All-in Sustaining cash Costs, I will see that reaching $1,829 compared to $1,521. If we were not by MSG, that is a position that we understand that would have a higher All-in Sustaining cash cost along the year of 2026. That's because we paid only $76 million on this mine. We understand that they had to go on the turnaround process. If in one hand, our All-in Sustaining cash cost is above as expected, in the other hand, the underground development is being well, we think that our expectations and significantly higher what this mine was performing in the past. For example, the advancement on the underground tunnels, when last year it was close to 35 m, 36 m per month. Now, we are reaching 60, 65. The all efficiency that we want to implement underground to do preparation for a higher production is moving as fast as expected, sometimes even faster than we expect. That if you take out the MSG, which should pollute our average during first quarter, second, along the full year, then we would have been on our sustaining cash cost close to $1,500 per ounce. Next. Very importantly that happened also during the quarter is Era Dorada project that now we have a full approval. This is an outstanding project that is getting attention from many stakeholders in the world because of its potential to be one of the highest standard in ESG. Why I say so? This project is going to put many different variables in the same and learnings from other mines in the same project. Number one, we bought a Bluestone combined with a geothermal project. This project, as we develop the geothermal project that is coming in the upcoming years, we have a renewable access to energy. Actually, we are thinking about increasing the MW in order to supply Guatemala with extra energy and with the renewable energy. Number two, we understand that clean water and treated purified water is an issue in the area. There's not many, if there is any, if any, municipalities that has a purified water, we will use the water that we have on the ground that we would have to treat anyway in order to put this water back to the rivers. We are now improving, and we approved additional investments on water treatment in order to have this water as purified and potable to the citizen. Renewable energy and clean water for the population together with all the local training and focus on having local people working with us, local suppliers. If we don't have suppliers, we train them, we form them so that we can improve the conditions of living for everyone that is around us. In terms of production, this is a project that stacks on the feasibility study that we mentioned, with annual production 111,000 ounces, yet with potential to further access upside as we've been doing in Aranzazu, as we've been doing in Borborema. We understand that Era Dorada also has room for further upside as we move forward with operations, as we more implement the project and go to commercial production. Another very important factors is that the significant increase in terms of reserve of this project that when we acquired as an underground, it was close to 1 million ounces. Now we have 1.7 million ounces in terms of reserves, yet with some potential on the regional side to increase resources and reserves. Next slide. I talked about ramp path of Borborema now reaching record high production. That's a significant increase of production profile last year and this year with also lower All-in Sustaining Costs. Number two, now I'm gonna share with you about the increase in resource and reserves, we saw a major change in our inventory in reserves and reserves, and resources coming from the last report that we filed on the F-1 for the Nasdaq listing was 3.4 million ounces in terms of reserves. Now we are reaching 7.2 million ounces. This is more than double the size of the reserves in one single year. Meanwhile, we come from resources of 4.6 million ounces down to 3.1 million ounces, but that's a very good news because we converted 2.5 million ounces of resources, Measured and Indicated, into proven and probable. If you add this back to the 3.1, you would see that we also continue to increase our Measured and Indicated. This is a major milestone that is helping us to just improve our life of mine while we are also increasing production per year. Next slide. I talked about increasing production, I talked about increasing resource and reserves, and now a important factor also to tackle the price per NAV, which is the daily trading volume. As I mentioned to you, we come from a $2 or $3 million, $4 million per day. Along after the listing, then we started reaching $20, $10, $30, $40 million. Now we are, last month, we closed April with $120 million per day in daily trading volume. On average, close to $95 million on the first quarter. That is attracting way more quantity and quality of investors to our portfolio. I'll turn now the presentation to Kleber Cardoso, and I'll come back for Q&A. Thanks, Rodrigo. Good morning, everyone. I'm going to go over a summary of the main financial KPIs for the quarter. What we can see in a summary is an improvement in basically all of them, with revenues a new record high, closing the quarter with $383 million. The last 12 months, we have exceeded revenues of $1.1 billion. Going forward, we expect this trend to continue. When we see the adjusted EBITDA, as Rodrigo commented before, we have reporting it for the sixth quarter in a row, a record high again, a substantial increase compared to 425, but mostly because a higher average gold price in that quarter. $244 million in the quarter, and now exceeding $700 million already in the last 12 months. Also a trend that we expect to continue. When we analyze the net income, we see a substantial improvement compared to the last quarters. That's a combination mainly of two factors. First is the improvement of the operational results, and second is on this quarter, gold price, it increased between the beginning and the end of the quarter, but at a slower rate than the increase we had in the last few quarters. As a result of that, we had lower mark-to-market losses with gold hedged derivatives that is impacting less our P&L this quarter than previous quarters. Later I'm gonna go over more detail on this as well. With that, we are reporting $95 million in net income and then, $190 million in adjusted net income. In terms of cash and net debt, mostly stable compared to the year-end. We closed the quarter with $115 million in net debt, and we see an important reduction in the financial leverage of the company as a result of stable net debt and increasing accumulated EBITDA. Our net leverage coming from 0.28- 0.16 at the end of this quarter. Now we just understand the main items between the adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income for this quarter. Out of the $244 million adjusted EBITDA, we see the three larger gold mines contributed the most. Borborema had the highest EBITDA, as we were already anticipating, $61 million. Minosa and Almas coming strong as well, $58 million and close to $50 million respectively. Araxá also strong for $1 million. Apoena, which we expect a much stronger second semester than the first semester, but already contributing with $24 million. MSG despite we're just starting the turnaround, so contributing as well with $17 million in EBITDA for this quarter. Depreciation and amortization, it's been in line with our expectation. It's been increasing the last two quarters, basically because we added two new operations, Borborema commercial production in Q4 2025, and now MSG at full quarter production in 2026. The net financial expenses, once again, the main items are the non-realized and realized losses with the gold derivatives. The non-realized portion of $24 million, and we paid $33 million with the realized losses. Combined, it was $55 million compared to over $100 million we had in losses with derivatives in the last quarter. That explains a portion of also the improvements in our net income. Income taxes expenses coming as well as expected, considering strong results from the operations. Some small other expenses bringing the net income to $95 million. Here to the right side, we excluded the typical non-cash items, the unrealized portion of the losses with the gold derivatives, some non-cash impact in deferred tax income. Excluding those items, the adjusted net income would have been $109 million by the end of the quarter. Here we bring a detailed analysis of the change in the cash position of the company throughout the quarter. We see on the, in red on the left side, here, we start with close to $290 million in cash. Here on the left side, we have what we call the recurring free cash flow to firm, which is the cash flow generated now by the six mines in production. That portion of the business generated $95 million. It's pretty much stable compared to the previous quarter. That's mostly there are two items that consume the cash proportionately higher in the first quarter than we expected for the rest of the year. First is working capital. We have some temporary increases in accounts payables and in inventory in this quarter that should improve in the next few quarters. Also income tax payments, where we paid $52 million. In the first quarter. The first quarter is usually the quarter that we paid most of the taxes, where you have annual tax adjustments, especially in Mexico. That will not repeat in the same proportion during the rest of the year. In the middle of the chart, we see the investment for growth, where we invested $26 million, mostly in expansion CapEx, already including Era Dorada. The CapEx, especially the expansion CapEx, is one that we expect to increase throughout the rest of the year, especially as we advance the construction of Era Dorada and also in the expansions in Almas. Here to the right side, we see how we allocated any cash in the financial items. We paid close to $20 million in gross debts, reducing the gross debt of the company, and distributed $55 million in dividends, ending our cash close to $207 million by the end of the quarter. With this, we end the presentation. Open to questions. Thank you. Thank you. We are going to start the question and answer section for investors and analysts. If you wish to ask a question, please click on Raise Hand. If your question has already been answered, you can leave the queue by clicking on Put Hand Down. Our first question comes from Henrique Marques with Goldman Sachs. You can open your microphone. Hey. Hi, everyone. Can you hear me? Loud and clear. Awesome. Yeah. Two questions from my side. First regarding the cost in Aranzazu, I think it did came above expectations and even like the guidance range for the year. At the same time, this was the only mine, you haven't commented on the mine sequence you weighted on the second half of the year. I just wanted to make sure, like, 1st, what really drove the higher cost in Q1? Second, do you see any risks to your cost guidance for Aranzazu? If not, when can we expect some improvement in terms of cost for this mine specifically? Second one just if you could give us a bit more color on the maintenance stoppage of the CIL plant in Borborema, is the situation resolved? Should we see any impacts on the second quarter? That would be great. Thank you. Sure. In Almas, while you mentioned that Almas had a higher cash cost compared to the guidance, I would also like to take a look on All-in Sustaining Costs that was actually below the guidance. This in the first quarter, what we had is the highest strip ratio and slightly lower grades. All that will improve during the second semester. We are very much in line with the guidance for Almas. We should also see improvement in MSG during the second semester. We should also see some improvement in Borborema, Minosa is stable, and Aranzazu, some improvement also during the second semester. As we saw in the, in all in the past where the first semester is lower production, we should see actually significant improve on the second semester in terms of production, not on the second quarter, but third and fourth quarter. This varies about our mine sequencing. As just a quick reminder for investors is that when we have a gold mining is very different from a major copper or iron ore, where it's a disseminated. The grades doesn't vary and the strip ratio doesn't vary. Gold, the nature is not homogeneous. It's always, they always vary quarter by quarter. Sometimes you reach higher grades or sometimes lower grades. Sometimes you need to push back the pit, increase a strip ratio. Sometimes you just collect what you already pushed back the pit. There is some volatility in terms of the quarter, which if you look back on the last four years, that's what happened to our volatility quarter to quarter. Actually, when we go to the average of the year, we are very much in line with the guidance that we provide to the market. We are very much comfortable that we are moving ahead with our guidance, actually, on the upper hand of the guidance in terms of production. Thank you. Yeah, I just wanted to clarify. Borborema, you mentioned about the CIL. Borborema, it's now producing very well. There's still improvements that we can do, mainly on filters. The filters are where we have the bottleneck. Although we overestimated, now the filters are performing very close or slightly below the plant capacity. We are now, we already ordered, we are already in construction of additional filters, already preparing them for further expansion. The new filters will also unlock some bottlenecks. Those filters will get started during Q3 and Q4. We should see also some improvements in Borborema in terms of production during the years, while we are finalizing our expansion plan for Borborema to reach 4 million tons on the upcoming years. Great. Thank you. Our next question comes from Rafael Barcellos with Bradesco BBI. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Rodrigo, despite being, you know, solid results, I think there are some watch points when we compare the numbers with your production and cost guidance, right? I just wanted to get a sense of which operations bring some concerns to you when you compare the production and cost evolution versus the guidance for the year. Lastly, if you can give us more details on your expectations for the second half of this year in terms of, again, of production and costs. The second question, particularly on the cost side. I mean, a lot has happened since you announced it, the cost guidance, right? I mean, we have the outbreak of the Middle East conflict. I just wanted to understand what sort of cost pressure you're seeing, driven by the conflict and if you can give, you know, more details on the specific impacts on the cost side. Thank you. Sure. No, thank you for the question, Rafael. Where, where it has been more challenging in the short term and not structural for us is MSG, of course. We were not expecting as low standards compression what we can put in terms of infrastructure and underground mines. We are now putting more effort, improving underground conditions, in order to bring that mine into the productivity that we believe that can be achieved. Every time we have any kind of issues and then, and, in MSG, as I was mentioning to the market in the last quarter, we will always focus on the underground development, even if it has to jeopardize the production of the month. If you have any equipment bottleneck, we'll divert all the equipment into underground development, not focus on production. That's what the main mistakes that the past owner was doing, is focusing too much on production and not doing the underground. We need to unbottleneck the underground mine. This is taking more time than we expected. But that's things that we can correct, things that we can manage. That's within the budget that we were projecting to invest $20 million-$30 million in order to improve that conditions in the mine. On the other hand, structurally, the mine is actually better than what we expected. We saw a significant increase in the life of mine and resource and reserve of the mine come from 340,000, 250,000 up to 700,000 ounces. Still a lot of room to continue to improve resource and reserves in that mine that we have not yet even started to take a look on the exploration we are focused on the mine. Long-term, medium to long-term projections on this mine is actually way better than we expected. Short-term, more challenging, as this is where we should see at the low range of the guidance. While if some other mines also, we can go beyond what we were expecting to offset part of this. Yet it's not our focus to have a high production this year in MSG. Our focus is to improve underground mine conditions and finish the year with a very clear view that we can bring that mine above 80,000 ounces of production per year and close to $2,000 of All-in Sustaining cash costs. That hasn't changed. Actually, as I mentioned, when we're doing underground development, we are moving far more efficient that we were doing in the past. Again, we're moving about 35 m per month. Now we are reaching 60, 65 m per month. This is being very satisfactory to see that we can, once we put them underground into our efficiency on the stable conditions, so that we can improve efficiency according to our plan. In terms of the cost of diesel, this is all across the world that it's happening, or impacting all these sustaining cash costs of the diesel. Should be between, depend on the mine, 6%-8%. Even if you increase 10% or 20%, that will have a 1% or 2% impact on our sustaining cash cost. And of course, then higher diesel triggers some inflation, many other different matters. There's no other sector that is way protected to inflation. I guess inflation that's gold and likely copper. If inflation picks up, gold is gonna increase. Somehow the investors are very well protected in this sector through inflation in US dollars. Thanks. It was really good. Sorry? No, just as a follow-up on the first question. I'm understanding that, you know, you're flagging more challenges on the MSG side. Is there any other, you know, operation that you'd like highlight as a watch point or anything that, you know, we should look at particularly in the second half? Thank you. No, you should see upsides coming from Almas as we continue to do exploration. We are increasing capacity. That mine As I mentioned, we know and we are already expanding to 3 million tons per year. We are just waiting for more confirmation and more exploration information in order to go even further and perhaps go to 4 million tons per year, which will combine several open pits and also underground development. That's a very important upside that should be tackled by the market in the upcoming quarters. Together with Borborema, that we are also now as we signed the contract to reallocate the road, and now we are finalizing all the engineering for improving capacity up to 4 million tons. We have several alternatives for more access to water, which is important in order for us to increase capacity. In the following couple of months, we should have a decision on that, wrapping up with the new engineering so that we can approve in the board in the between Q2 or Q3 expansion for Borborema. Expansion coming up in Almas, expansion coming up in Borborema. While we continue to develop Era Dorada now going into full construction. Okay, perfect. Thank you. Our next question comes from Lucas Laghi with XP. Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Two follow-ups from our side. The 1st one on MSG. I mean, Rodrigo, you commented on some of the improvements that we expect throughout the year, but just wanted to better understand the timeline regarding the turnaround on the project. I mean, now that you're much more familiar with the operations, what could we expect in terms of run rate production by year-end? You mentioned that we should expect some decrease by 2Q, but just wanted to understand what could be the run rate by the year-end. What are the most important milestones that we should be aware on such turnaround? Finally, still on MSG. I mean, just to clarify, do you see any upside considering the potential normalized volumes for the operations by the end of this turnaround? My second question on Borborema, another follow-up, you mentioned the expansion, right at 4 million tons of plant feed after the expansion. Just to get a better idea on timeline, I mean, how or when could we see such investments being deployed? If you could give us any idea on CapEx and production improvement considering the marginal grades for the expansion would also be very helpful. Thank you. Okay. No, for MSG, the idea is to finish the year with a very clear view that we will be able for the next year to be close to 80,000 ounces of production per year and close to $2,000 of our new sustaining cash flow. That's our main objective. Our key drivers for you to take a look on that is how far, how fast we are advancing on the underground development. That's why I reinforce that in the past year, we're doing 30 m-35 m per month. Now we are close to 60 m-65 m. We should continue to advance underground development so that we can invert the methodology, right? Now the mine is operating from up to down, and now we need to do underground development in excess so we can start doing bottom up. This is what will change structurally our efficiency, recover, dilution and also productivity at the mine. We need time to do that, right? We cannot do all those underground development in a couple of months. It takes several months, and we believe that we will be able to conclude that preparation by the end of this year. You should not see strong numbers, very strong numbers on Q1. Q2, as I mentioned, slightly and gradually increased progress on Q3 and Q4, not because of structurally the diversion of the methodology, but now we are gaining efficiency, reducing costs all across the board with contracts, redefining some scope with suppliers and so on. That's all happening at the same time. We are very comfortable that we will achieve this goal by the end of the year. In terms of Borborema, we have not yet approved in the board and disclosed the CapEx. Unfortunately, I cannot yet give you a guidance on this, but we will do so as we approve the information, the board. The investment, relocating the board, preparing a water assessment and everything should take close to two years, but we will get more precise information as we approve in the board. As you well mentioned, we should not expect, for example, to keep exactly the same grades or doubling the capacity. Does not necessarily mean that we'll double the production because then we cannot supply the additional capacity with a lower grade. Of course, when you have a restricted capacity, you focus on higher grade. When you increase capacity, you can have both high grade and medium grade. That will translate into a higher production. Will translate in the lower cash cost as well, but not necessarily will double the gold production. Got it. Perfect. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from Lawson Winder with Bank of America. Thanks. Thank you very much. Hello, Rodrigo. Nice to hear from you. Appreciate the update today. Quick question I'd like to ask about staging. There's a number of projects happening at the current moment. There's the Borborema expansion. You're looking at going underground at MSG. There's Matupá waiting right after Era Dorada. Are you confident that you have a large enough team in place that you guys can handle all this? In answering that question, how do you think about the staging of all these projects and making sure that you have the best people in the right place at the right time? Thank you for the question, Lawson. That's our main discussions that we have internally. It's about people. We have a lot to perform in order to increase capacity. Very few companies in the world can come from close to 300, 285,000 ounces of production last year in the upcoming years reach over 600,000 ounces without new M&As, which we are also planning to do. That of course, drags a lot of management attention. We have a very strong team to build new mines. It's the same team that built Almas. It's the same team that built Borborema. It's the same team that's now in Era Dorada. Of course, this team is increasing. The good thing is that we are not overlapping the construction of Era Dorada and Matupá. Right? We don't want to build both. We could start building Matupá right now. It is fully licensed, and we have the feasibility study. We are updating, because we are going to incorporate new deposits. We want to create a lag in order not to overlap the same functions of the team. During the construction, we have the prepare meet early works, then we have the plant and the ramp-up. Right? We don't want to overlap exactly the same. We want to lag. Perhaps start the construction of Matupá during next year, where we will be already on the final phase of Era Dorada. In Eldorado, we already be on the very good speeds. The team also combined with the local team in Borborema and Almas. It's not taking full attention from the construction team in Borborema and full attention of the construction team in Almas, where there's some shared activities. We have also We're gonna bring the engineers and construction team also into the sites, not only using the Eldorado team. It is something that we need to pay close attention. That's most of why we are not overlapping construction of Matupá and Eldorado. It's something that we cannot disregard, and that's a concern that we have. That's what, where myself, Glauber, the technical team is spending a lot of time. I think you read my mind because you mentioned M&A as another demand on the time of management. Could you just describe the current pipeline of M&A opportunities, particularly vis-a-vis, you know, the last year and the year before? Would you describe the opportunity as increasing or decreasing? Any commentary on sort of on valuation where sellers are thinking of valuation and where buyers are, and whether there's a gap there or whether you think there's room for negotiation? Yeah, good question. It was increasing, you know, opportunities, but not for the right reasons, just because in the past, just a couple of months ago, when gold price reached $5,500 or $5,400, increased a number of opportunities, but the expectation of the seller was completely out of what we would also pay. Now it's accommodating the expectation of the seller and expectation of the buyer. There's still some gap, but there's more room to work. We are confident that now we can get more traction in M&A activities along the year. Of course, it's unpredictable. M&A is, it's a combination of what we want and, or what is available. The fact is there are opportunities. We are looking few alternatives. There's nothing that is advanced. There's nothing that is close to happen. We are, of course, prospecting and engaging few different conversations. M&A is like an investor. What the investor does, right? They select 10 companies, start analyzing, deep diving in six, start negotiation five to get only one. Right? It takes time. Okay. Thank you. That's all my questions. Today's update has been very helpful. Thank you for that. Thank you, Lawson. Our next question comes from Tathiane Candini with JP Morgan. Hello, everyone. Good morning. Can you hear me well? Yes. Okay. I think I just have, like, a couple of follow-ups from the questions that you already answered. My first one, and I would just follow up on the question that you just answered on M&A. As you already flagged, I think we have, like, Matupá already under the radar. The company still have a very, like, comfortable cash flow, and actually balance sheet, position at this point. My first question here is, when it comes to M&A, you mentioned that you know what you want. Can you share just a little bit on what are the main perspectives that you search when you are thinking about the M&A, if you have, like, any specific region that you see more availability if you want to grow more in Brazil? Just to understand a little bit of the profile that you are looking to the next M&As. I will do my question after. No, I think, it's clear that we are Americas player, North America, Central America and South America player. We are not focusing in looking alternatives in Africa, Asia or Australia. We are gold and copper, we look in both sides. We like combination of gold and copper. We used to be 30% copper, 70% gold. Gold price has improved. We are investing in gold mostly in the last three years. The copper is being reduced, we would like preferably to increase our copper in our portfolio, yet the alternatives that we've been seeing gold is way more attractive. That's why we are now more on gold. In terms of, we don't look for state-of-the-art projects. Those projects are state-of-the-art and flagship assets. They tend to be overpriced and overvalued. Normally companies overpay for state-of-the-art projects that has a full feasibility, big production, higher grade and no concern in any kind of risks whatsoever. I think if you look what we've done in the past is a very good example in what we look we would look in the future. Take Borborema. We don't like also to take a full exploration risk. We are not a exploration developer. We don't feel we have the skills to find new mines out of the blue. We need we like to enter any project that already has good progress in terms of exploration, significantly de-risk also in exploration. Borborema has already resources and reserves, had problem with water access. We had an angle to solve the water access and then we could implement the project. At Era Dorada, that could be defined as state-of-the-art in terms of grades and capacity, but had a strong local and community opposition because the project was open pit. We converted back to underground, so we couldn't lock the opposition from the community. Actually, now they support the project. That's why we are moving forward with them. Those are greenfield projects, close to construction. Not a lot of exploration risk, but had some issues that we had to put our people to work and unlock the value. Another example, MSG, a mine that's already operating, but not core or major players. That is underperformed in terms of productivity that we understand that we can buy for a good value, implement all that we know how to do the turnaround, improve efficiency gains, and then put that mine into higher production. There's always gonna be a very strong eyes on where are we adding value to that project, not just buy for full price to increase capacity by size on the objective. Very clear on that one. The Second question is still on MSG. I think that's the main subject here today. When we check your guidance on costs, of course, they are higher than the average of your projects. This kind of implies that your Second half costs are going to be like almost half. How confident do you feel that this is going to be delivered? Do you have, like, any? Like, what is your main struggle to actually reach the guidance? Do you feel that, like we discussed a lot of moving parts, right? With the underground development, with the FX, also with the diesel. Do you feel there is, like, a room for this to get even, like, further than the top of your guidance here? No, I don't know where you got the number that we need to now perform as a half during the second semester because that should be also have a higher production. On the weighted average, maybe not sure which calculation you made, but there will be improvements on the second semester. Sorry, just to mention that is like, just thinking on cash costs per ton, as an average, but that's fair. Structurally, we will see improvements in Q3 and Q4. Structurally is a mine that will not have the average of our ore. Structurally is a mine actually that will push our All-in Sustaining Costs above the average that we have. That's not a problem because we paid only $76 million to this, and the internal rate of return of this project will be significantly high to our shareholders. Particularly now, It was already high, and now you added a new resource and reserve. It's a project that we feel very comfortable. It's becoming more challenging on the short term, as we expected. On the other hand, is way above expectations on the long term. We are not focusing too much on production. We're not focusing too much on cash costs during the first, second quarter, and we'll see improvement on the second semester. Our main objective, which is the KPIs and the variable remuneration on this project is way more towards preparing this mine to get close to 80,000 ounces of production and close to 2,000 ounces of our All-in Sustaining cash costs, so that we can plan that for next year. Okay. Very clear. And- Sorry. No, go ahead. Yeah. No, my last question, I think we didn't discuss this a lot here in this call, just to kind of understand your view on gold prices. I think overall market remains very bullish on the overall story. We agree with that. Just wanted to hear your thoughts on how do you see this, like, all this impact from the recent war developments and how your perspective for this year. First, I'd like to also disclose that I don't feel that I am an expert in gold price, right? I think investors are way more informed than on that. We don't take decisions in order expecting gold price to go up and down. We take decisions based on what is the higher production I can achieve at the lowest cost, and that's it. Gold price is just an input. Nevertheless, I need to learn, I need to participate and analyze, and I talk to many people participating on other boards. I need to follow. The idea is that on the big picture is what has been pushing gold prices up is the two major variables. Number one, the excess of capital, the excess of liquidity in the world. You see United States at $39 trillion now on debt, and + $2 trillion per year in terms of deficit. Now changing treasuries, paying treasuries that cost 1%-2% to a treasury that costs close to 4%. That's increasing significantly the financial expense over excess of debt, over excess of deficit. The world is starting to think about where this can go, right? Maybe we might have to print, maybe they'll have to lower interests and live with inflation. That has not changed. Actually that is, the wars are even getting this worse because that is the same situation with Europe. Actually, Europe is way worse than the U.S. Well, comparatively to every other country in the world, the U.S. is not that bad, but yet, it's not easy to tackle that deficit. The whole world now, the U.S. is reducing the amount they spending on army in Europe and other countries. They were now talking about increasing the budget for defense while they should be decreasing the deficit. That's only pushing deficit to higher levels. That's only pushing the need to print money higher. That's one thing that the world is happening now. It's all situations only deteriorate in terms of public accounts and deficits. The most interesting part in is that we don't hear any single conversation about governments, about tackling the deficit, right? Many other subjects to talk, reducing cost, it has not been politically talked in any country so far. That will push, can continue to push gold ahead. The second point that pushes gold ahead has not changed, and actually is also improved in terms of pressure, is that the result of the war of Ukraine and Russia, where the world confiscated all the US dollars from Russia, has just hit the alarm that the countries that are not don't feel aligned with United States, they should not have super high exposure to US dollar, which means treasury. What we've been seeing now in the world is that China continue to import and produce higher gold and central banks are also in high, very high purchase. Last quarter, another record high purchase from central banks, particularly in China, which they disclose. We do not know what they do not disclose. That's just getting worse and worse. The factors that push gold higher are there and getting even more present. On the short term, there is this volatility that happens. My humble opinion is that we will continue to see gold prices going up. Actually, I would also invite, that was just reading the other day that who is buying the Treasury now, right? We see now Fed buying Treasury in internal market in the U.S. The world is not yet, not anymore, giving that much of support for the U.S. debt. That is a structural significant change in the world, while perhaps U.S. will not be that important in the upcoming years and the upcoming decades as a major presence. We continue to be important, but perhaps losing some importance. Gold plays a major role on this rebalancing of currencies. Thank you very much, Rodrigo. Very clear. Our next question comes from Edgard Pinto de Souza with Itaú BBA. Hi. Hi, everyone. Rodrigo, Kleber, Natasha, thank you for the questions. I want to start, I'm sorry to insist in this point, Rodrigo, on the cost front. I think that you were super clear about the gradual improvement in production throughout the year. This makes us comfortable that you are going to achieve your production guidance for the year. On the cost front, we are a little bit disappointed in the 1st Q. We understand that there are some mine sequencing, there is the infrastructure works at MSG and so on and so forth. We have something that is important, that is the FX impact, right? I want to understand from you, first, which was the average FX that you consider during the guidance? Do you have any sensitivity about the impacts of a stronger BRL and also a stronger Mexican peso on your cost guidance? This, despite you being very comfortable about the operational performance, maybe could put your performance in the year more closer to the upper end of the guidance, right? Do you think that there is room to be even better in terms of operational and more than offset the impacts of the FX year? My second question is related to the hedge, right? We have been discussing this a lot. How are you going to think about hedging policy going forward? The fact is, for Almas and for Borborema, you started building the hedge once you approved the projects, right? Now you approved the Era Dorada, I wanted to understand what are you going to do in terms of hedges for Era Dorada, if you are doing something or not, and when you want to build that. Also, to connect this with my first question. Do you consider any structure in terms of hedges for the FX, zero cost collar and so forth? We know that some companies, not gold companies, but other companies that we cover, they are using a lot of structures of zero cost collars for FX, for costs and so forth. How do you think about that also? Thank you. I will start the first question, and then I'll ask Kleber to finish. Talk more specific of the FX, and then we go back to the hedges. In terms of our cash costs, you know, sustaining cash costs, I think just as we highlighted and I will reinforce, is that it varies quarter by quarter and mine by mine, according to the mine sequences, mainly due to rates, strip ratio, and whether if you are pushing back the pit or not, right? We will see a progress in terms of production during the second semester that give us very comfortably that we can reach a production at the middle of, if not above the middle of the guidance, right? Close to that. That will reflect also in cash costs. We'll see higher production and lower cash costs also very comfortably that will be in the guidance. Kleber, if you wanna talk a little bit more on FX impact in Brazil, Mexico, I think that'll be good. Edgard, the FX was around $5.30 that we use in the guidance. There is some challenge, but so far as we see and with our running forecasts is that we would still be comfortable in delivering the cash costs and our All-in Sustaining Costs of the Brazilian operations. We have also cost reduction initiatives in, you know, the business units. Considering the levels where the Mexican peso and the Brazilian real are now, we're comfortable with that guidance without needing to review the guidance considering the current appreciation of those two currencies. I can comment on the hedging as well. Yeah, you can comment. Yeah. On the hedges and you compare with what we did for Vergel and Almas, it's important just to first understand the context when we do the hedges, and second, where we are now. Historically, we did the hedges to protect the company because of major investments we did at those times. If gold prices had some sharp reduction that could put the company at the risk at the time. Historically did a zero cost collar because was a way selling the calls was a way to finance the insurance, which was the put options now to hedge until we got the payback and make sure that the money we invest in the project, we got the payback. What's the difference now? First is in terms of company, we are much more diversified. If you remember when we started building Almas, we had only three other mines, now we have Six. We are less exposed at risk when with one single project. Second, also our margins now are much stronger, much higher, and both the EBITDA margins and the cash conversion than at the time. We have much more buffer and the risk, financial risk is much less. Regardless of that, we are analyzing, we still are discussing with the boards. Potentially we have now an opportunity not to do zero cost collar like we did in the past. We might buy put options because gold price was so much in the last few years. That might be much cheaper today to buy put options. It's still because we have that less pressure and because there has been so much volatility in the gold prices in the last couple of weeks, any option becomes more expensive. We are analyzing and we keep quoting and seeing the cost of these structures and discussing with the board the scenarios and the right timing to implement this kind of hedging. Yeah. For exchange rate, there's nothing you can do against or in favor in the long term. You can hedge short term, that has a cost, but structurally you don't change, you don't protect your business of a hedging short term. If you have important milestone that you need to achieve, and if you have a CapEx to do that, you know, you've already calculated our internal rate of return and half of the CapEx in dollars, half of CapEx is in reals, we might think. Structurally, there's nothing you can do. We're just gonna pay every quarter to do a hedge that won't change your business overall. Okay. What we can do is get more if the exchange rate pushes our cost up, more focus, more attention, and try to bring back the cost down by new efficiency gains or cost reduction. AI is coming, right? It will give many companies alternatives to find places to reduce costs. Okay. Thank you, Rodrigo. Really like the pictures from Era Dorada. Very interesting to see. Oh, yeah. She's coming. Things are advancing there. Thank you. Our next question comes from Marcelo Arazi with BTG. Hi, guys. Good morning. Two questions on my side as well. I think the first one is a simpler one. The company has been delivering several triggers and milestones, especially since the IPO last year. Looking forward, what else can we expect to be announced until the end of this year? What are the next milestones for the investment case? If I may have a second one, just a follow-up on the M&A discussion. We have been seeing other bigger gold projects being developed in Latin America. Especially in Guyana, with productions in the north of 200, 250 ounces. Can we expect Aura to be looking at this kind of projects? Rodrigo mentioned that it has to be something that Aura can add value to. And despite being bigger assets, I think they are still sitting on more challenging jurisdictions that you guys can operate quite well. Just wanted to hear your thoughts on that as well. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Marcelo. All right. In terms of triggers, I think we have expansion of Borborema. We have exploration and further expansion perhaps in Almas, but that will be more towards the end of the year. We are also updating feasibility study for Matupá towards the end of the year. And of course, the improvement of the progress we make with the turnaround in MSG. Those are important factors for us to monitor along the next quarters. In terms of M&A, we monitor those transactions. Some of them we participate, some of we don't. Some we like, some we don't like. It's not that we do not like bigger mines, 200,000 ounces, 300,000 ounces, but we need to find where we're going to find our, where is Aura going to build value into that operation, right? That will always depend on the entry price. We are very, very concerned and very focused on internal rate of return. If you overpay and then your internal rate of return is gonna be reduced, and then you'll adjust. Normally you overpay for very big assets, so then you leverage or you put a lot of capital in a lower return project that can jeopardize the average. Our strategy's been super successful so far. We believe we can continue to do projects between 100 and 150 where shows our ability to have a higher internal rate of return up to 1 million ounces. After that, then we would have to rethink our strategy. For sure then we would have to go into a bigger project that has lower returns. I think there's still room for us to continue to grow in the high return projects up to 1 million ounces. After that, we'll have to reshuffle and rethink the strategy and go to a lower return projects. That's very clear. Thank you. The Q&A session is over. We would like to hand the floor back to Mr. Rodrigo Barbosa for the company's final remarks. Now, just to recap, we are moving forward very solid steps towards our story that we share with the market first in 2020 and recently, with the Nasdaq listing, in mid-2025. We are increasing production. We developed Borborema last year. Borborema continued to improve production this quarter. We mentioned that we would continue to grow through acquisitions. We acquired MSG. MSG now is in the turnaround process very much. Our focus is to buy greenfield projects that are ready to build or mines that is in operations that we have an angle to add value, do the turnaround. We did that also with MSG. We mentioned to the market that we would start construction of a new greenfield project during this year, either, Era Dorada or Matupá. We just approved the construction of Era Dorada. We also mentioned to the market that we would increase resource and reserves. We just published a 20-F with a significant increase in reserves to over 7 million ounces, and now resources above 3 million ounces. That's also extending the life of mine, of our mines, while we are also increasing production. We also mentioned to the market that we would have to increase our daily trading volume, and now we are delivering on average the last quarter $95 million. We are doing very solid steps towards our strategy to reach above 600,000 ounces, which is already defined. We know how, very well how to get there. We would like to continue to grow through M&As. I just mentioned that we aim to achieve 1 million ounces, but that would require new M&As that we should do perhaps in the upcoming years. It was also solid quarter in terms of results as the market and analysts questioned our All-in Sustaining cash costs above the other quarters. Most of these come from MSG, which was expected, and secondly, also from mine sequences, which was also expected. We should see second semester coming in strong, which will improve production and also reduce the All-in Sustaining cash costs. While doing all of that, continue the very solid step with dividends, continue to be 1 of the highest dividend yield in the sector. Despite that our shares has significantly appreciated, our dividend yield of course reduced compared to what we were, one year ago, not because of the lower dividends, just because now the market start to pick up. There's still a lot of room to increase the multiple, and we will be tackling this multiple by increased liquidity, more conversation with investors, telling more the story and walking the talk and increasing our size. I thank you all for participation, and I will be following up with the market as we have any kind of news. Aura's conference is now closed. We thank you for your participation and wish you a nice day.