Broadcom Inc.'s second quarter fiscal year 2021 financial results conference call. At this time, for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to Ji Yoo, Director of Investor Relations of Broadcom Inc. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me on today's call are Hock Tan, President and CEO, Kirsten Spears, Chief Financial Officer, Tom Krause, President, Infrastructure Software Group, and Charlie Kawwas, Chief Operating Officer. Broadcom also distributed a press release and financial tables after the market closed, describing our financial performance for the second quarter of fiscal year 2021. If you did not receive a copy, you may obtain the information from the investor section of Broadcom's website at broadcom.com. This conference call is being webcast live, and a recording will be available via telephone playback for one week. It will also be archived in the investors section of our website at broadcom.com. During the prepared comments, Hock and Kirsten will be providing details of our second quarter fiscal year 2021 results, guidance for our third quarter, as well as commentary regarding the business environment. We'll take questions after the end of our prepared comments. Please refer to our press release today and our recent filings with the SEC for information on the specific risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made on this call. In addition to US GAAP reporting, Broadcom reports certain financial measures on a non-GAAP basis. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP measures is included in the tables attached to today's press release. Comments made during today's call will primarily refer to our non-GAAP financial results. I'll now turn the call over to Hock. Thank you, Ji, and thank you everyone for joining us today. In Q2, Semiconductor Solutions revenue grew a strong 20% year-on-year to $4.8 billion. With Infrastructure Software revenue growing an expected 4% year-on-year to $1.8 billion, consolidated net revenue was $6.6 billion, up 15% year-on-year. On the last earnings call we had, we talked about how strong broadband and networking bookings were from hypercloud and service providers, even as wireless was declining seasonally. In Q2 just passed, not only do we see broadband and networking sustaining, we now see a recovery of bookings from enterprise. On the supply side, hourly times have now stabilized, but the volume of bookings we are experiencing today continues to grow. We intend to meet such demand, and in doing so, we maintain our disciplined process of carefully reviewing our backlog, identifying real end user demand, and delivering products accordingly. With that as context, let me provide you more color. Starting with broadband, which interestingly now is going through somewhat of a renaissance. Revenue grew 28% year-on-year and represented 18% of our semiconductor revenue. As discussed during our broadband teaching, the work, learn, and play from home environment is driving global service providers to expand connectivity to the home. In our broadband carrier access business, PON, fiber or otherwise known as PON, grew over 40% year-on-year, mostly with existing generation 2.5G. With next generation 10G PON representing only 30% today, there is significant room for content growth as 10G PON deploys over the next few years. Not to be outdone by fiber, cable operators in the U.S. are driving deployment of DOCSIS 3.1 cable modems. We saw an 80% year-on-year growth and planning to accelerate the upgrades to next generation DOCSIS 4.0. Our broadband technologies, in fact, are enabling service providers to complement the 5G they deliver to deliver the best experience for consumers. Now overlaying all these last-mile broadband upgrades, we see a demand surge for the latest Wi-Fi 6 and 6E technology to enable the last 100 feet of connectivity in homes. Broadcom has emerged as a clear market and technology leader in Wi-Fi for access gateways to the home and to enterprises, with over 50 million ports shipped in Q2 alone, or a year-on-year revenue growth of some 30%. On the other hand, as we might expect with the push into higher performance fiber, copper, DSL, digital subscriber line deployments for wireline broadband declined 30% year-on-year, and with a lack of live events during the pandemic, video declined 20%. With the onset of 5G, service providers are competing for subscribers, leading to technology upgrades globally in fiber, cable, and Wi-Fi connectivity. We're seeing this investment cycle in broadband expanding into 2022. For Q3, we expect to sustain double-digit year-on-year revenue growth in this segment. Moving on to networking. Networking grew 10% year-on-year and represented 32% of our semiconductor revenue. We experienced tailwinds from hyper cloud and telcos, partially offset by headwinds from enterprise. Revenue for switching was up 30% year-on-year, primarily driven by the strong ramp of our Trident and Tomawhack 3 for over 400G platforms at hyper cloud data centers. In the networks, service providers have been investing in 5G infrastructure worldwide, where the demand for Jericho two at the metro core and Qumran at the edge have been robust, with revenue up 35% year-on-year. Enterprise demand in networking has not yet recovered, still down double-digits from a year ago. As we go into the back half of the year, we expect to see cloud hyperscale upgrading to our next generation Trident Tomawhack 4 or over 800G switching platforms and sustained strength by service providers in network routing. Accordingly, in Q3, we expect networking revenue to maintain the trend of low double-digit growth year-over-year without the complete recovery of enterprise demand. Speaking of enterprise, let's talk about server storage connectivity, which represented approximately 12% of semiconductor revenue. This end market is largely driven by enterprise. In line with our guidance, revenue was down 16% year-over-year. You may recall, however, in Q1, this was down 22%. As the economy starts to recover, we have seen an improving demand trajectory. In Q3, we expect server storage connectivity revenue to be down high single-digit percentage year-on-year. With the launch of Intel's Ice Lake and this Milan, as well as future Arm-based servers, this space is turning quite exciting and innovative for us, both in hardware and software. We will provide obviously more color during our next teach-in in July on our server storage business. Moving on to wireless. Q2 revenue was down 16% sequentially, reflecting seasonality with wireless representing 34% of semiconductor revenue mix. Nonetheless, on a year-over-year basis, wireless revenue was up 48%, reflecting a very favorable compare year-on-year, as well as content increases in RF and Wi-Fi. In Q2, we were able to ship more than we had originally planned. Accordingly, in Q3, we expect the growth trend in wireless revenue to sustain but at over 30% year-on-year. Finally, industrial and other represented approximately 4% of Q2 Semiconductor Solutions revenue. Resales grew 34% year-over-year in Q2, driven by recovery in automotive and China. Inventory in the channel continues to deplete as what we shipped in the distributors grew only 23%. Turning to Q3, we expect resales to continue to grow double-digit percentage on a year-on-year basis. Summary, Q2 Semiconductor Solutions segment was up 20% year-on-year, and in Q3, we expect revenue growth year-over-year to be of a similar amount. Turning to software. In Q2, Infrastructure Software produced another quarter of steady and predictable results as revenue grew 4% year-on-year and represented 27% of total revenue. Now, if we exclude professional services, our enterprise software revenue grew 7% actually year-over-year. A further indicator of the quality and sustainability of our products, over 90% of our software bookings represented recurring subscription and maintenance with an average contract lifespan from core customers pretty much close to three years. We continue to believe our Infrastructure Software business is on track to grow at or better than mid-single digit% year-over-year, which is again, what we expect to see in Q3. Summarizing this, demand continues to be robust, our Q2 consolidated net revenue grew 15% year-over-year. We expect the momentum to sustain in Q3 and total revenue to be at $6.75 billion or up 16% year-on-year. With that, let me now turn the call over to Kirsten Spears. Thank you, Hock. Let me now provide additional detail on our financial performance. Revenue was $6.6 billion for the quarter, up 15% from a year ago. Gross margins were a record 75% of revenue in the quarter and up approximately 180 basis points year on year. Operating expenses were $1.2 billion, down 1% year on year, driven by lower SG&A, offset in part by increased investment in R&D. Operating income for the quarter was $3.8 billion and was up 25% from a year ago. Operating margin was 58% of revenue, up approximately 470 basis points year on year. Adjusted EBITDA was $4 billion or 60% of revenue. This figure excludes $133 million of depreciation. Now a review of the P&L for our two segments. Revenue for our Semiconductor Solutions segment was $4.8 billion and represented 73% of total revenue in the quarter. This was up 20% year on year. Gross margins for our Semiconductor Solutions segment were approximately 69%, up 290 basis points year-on-year, driven primarily by higher product margins. This margin improvement comes from content growth as we deploy more next-generation products in broadband and networking end markets. Operating expenses were $795 million in Q2, up approximately 2% year-on-year as we invested in R&D and streamlined SG&A. R&D was $702 million in Q2, up approximately 6% year-on-year. Q2 operating margins increased to 53%, up 580 basis points year-on-year. While semiconductor revenue was up 20%, operating profit grew 35%. Moving to the P&L for our Infrastructure Software segment. Revenue for Infrastructure Software was $1.8 billion and represented 27% of revenue. This was up 4% year-on-year. Gross margins for Infrastructure Software were 90% in the quarter, up 100 basis points year-over-year. Operating expenses were $355 million in the quarter, down 8% year-over-year as we've completed the integration of Symantec. R&D spending at $228 million is up 1% year-over-year. Operating profit was up 10% year-over-year on top line growth of 4%. Operating margin was 70% in Q2, up 360 basis points year-over-year. Moving to cash flow. Free cash flow in the second quarter was $3.4 billion, representing 52% of revenue. Day sales outstanding were 33 days in the second quarter, compared to 51 days a year ago. We ended the second quarter with inventory of $1 billion, an increase of $52 million or 5% from the end of the prior quarter. We should also note in Q2 we spent $126 million on capital expenditures. On the financing front, we extended our weighted average debt maturity to approximately 10 years from nine by exchanging notes. Our weighted average coupon decreased about five basis points to 3.7%. During the quarter, we made $1.5 billion in payments on debt obligations, ending the quarter with $9.5 billion of cash and $40.4 billion of total debt, of which $278 million is short term. Turning to capital allocation. In the quarter, we paid stockholders $1.6 billion of cash dividends. We also paid $461 million in withholding taxes due on vesting of employee equity, resulting in the elimination of approximately 1 million AVGO shares. We ended the quarter with 410 million outstanding common shares and 450 million diluted shares. Note that we expect the diluted share count to be 449 million in Q3. The board of directors has approved a quarterly cash dividend on our common stock of $3.60 per share in Q3. Based on current trends and conditions, our guidance for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 is for consolidated revenues to be $6.75 billion and adjusted EBITDA of approximately 60% of projected revenue. That concludes my prepared remarks. Operator, please open up the call for questions. Thank you. As a reminder to ask a question, please press Star one on your touchtone telephone. Again, that's Star one on your touchtone telephone to ask a question. To withdraw your question, press the hash key. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster Our first question comes from the line of John Pitzer of Credit Suisse. Your line is open. Yeah, good afternoon, guys. Thanks for letting me ask the question. Hock, I've got two quick ones. First, within your wireless business, you've been able to sign long-term contracts with your key customer, and I'd argue that's benefited both you and them. It's given you the confidence to invest in the business properly and then the confidence that you'll have supply for them when they need it. I'm just kind of curious, given how tight things are elsewhere in the semi business, have you been able to parlay this into any longer-term customer contracts, and what implication might that have as we all start to worry about the "end of cycle"? Secondly, just on your comments about enterprise recovery, can you elaborate on that? Was that specifically a storage comment, or is that also a networking comment? Okay. Let me take the question one at a time. On arrangements with long-term agreements, John, this is something we have been thoughtfully, carefully putting in place with our core strategic customers. We just don't go do it as if it's commoditized. We're very thoughtful about doing it, and we do it in very specific areas where we know for sure that the technology is fairly difficult, complex to manage, and which requires a substantial amount of R&D spending. We've been doing it for a while now with strategic customers in core businesses. We just don't do it across the board. What you pointed out is very correct. It's a structure, it's an agreement with mutual benefit. We have the confidence to invest in R&D to make CapEx capacity investment, and in return, we offer the best leading-edge technology in specific areas in a timely manner to our critical customers. Yes, we have been doing it, and we will continue to thoughtfully do it in a very appropriate manner. On the second part, okay, if you could repeat the question, John, let me be sure I capture everything. Yeah. Just to elaborate a little bit on your comments about an enterprise recovery brewing. Was that mostly within storage or was it networking? I'm a little bit surprised given some of Cisco's comments that you're not a little bit more positive on the enterprise network space. It is for enterprise spending. I won't say across the board necessarily, and trying to define enterprise very appropriately. As you noticed in my comments, we classify service providers, telcos, as a separate animal, different from traditional enterprise. As I pointed out, based on broadband, telcos have been investing big time. Service providers, telcos, have been investing in a huge manner over the past 12 months. Traditional enterprise, the companies, whether it's the banks, the manufacturing sector, various retail customers, airlines, examples. No, these guys are in a recovery mode. Not surprising, we are seeing pandemic easing, let's say in North America. As it eases, we see a step up in spending, but we do not see spending spiking up. Obviously, if you look at some businesses like warehouses that require Wi-Fi networks, campus networking environment, you do see that improving. To say across the board, all enterprises are just spending money, we are still seeing, and as I showed that in servers, storage, connectivity, we still see a year on year things are not up to what it was a year ago. That applies not just on data centers, namely compute. It also applies to data centers in enterprise campus environment. We see less of that, but across the board. Helpful. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur of JP Morgan. Good afternoon. Great job on the quarter's execution, strong margins, and free cash flow generations. Hock, I think as you mentioned, we're still in the early phases of the 400G networking upgrade cycle with your hyperscale and telco customers. I know two of your big cloud hyperscale customers have already started the upgrade. Looks like there are another two more that are going to start the upgrade cycle here in the second half of this year and quite a bit more next year. As you mentioned, you still have Tomahawk 4 ahead of you. Given the extended visibility that the team has with a strong backlog, do you see the cloud and telco upgrade cycle and inevitable recovery in enterprise driving continued year-over-year growth in networking into next year? We don't really try to guide more than one quarter at a time, first of all, because we're not that smart to be able to do that. On a broader trajectory, it does appear fairly much the trend, as we said, which is the cloud hyperscale will push out in the second half, as indicated on their data center side on Tomawhack 4, the 800G platform. We have potential backlog for delivery in the back half of the year for Tomawhack 4. We see that going on. You're right, we see the recovery step by step of enterprise, though I do not see that really taking off in terms of reaching the level it was a year ago, probably until 2022. What we do not know for sure is would that give pause to cloud hyperscale in their spending? That part, I'm just putting everything on the table. We're not sure whether hyper cloud spending will necessarily continue into 2022. We sense it would. We see some of the backlog. As enterprise steps up, one never knows if the economy starts to rebalance in that side. What we do see in broadband is service providers, the telcos in particular, are for sure upgrading. Here, this is the longest cycle of upgrades, and we see them upgrade, and we see the backlog associated with it through 2022. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Ross Seymore of Deutsche Bank. Your question, please. Hey, guys. Thanks for letting me ask a question. Congrats on the strong results. Hock, I wanted to dive a little bit into the lead time commentary that you had with that stabilizing. Two quarters ago, you talked about the size of the book, the backlog you had. Last quarter, you talked about the year-over-year, and even in some instances, the sequential growth being so large in bookings. Now we're hearing that the lead times are stabilizing. People can interpret that a bunch of different ways as far as the implication on the demand side of the equation, or that supply's catching up to it, or frankly, people are just ordering so far out that they're not willing to extend that any further. I was hoping to double-click on that lead time commentary and get your feelings as to why it's stabilizing, and do you take that as a positive or a negative? Oh, I just make a comment to say we have stretched out our lead time so far, Ross. Good point you bring up, and I'm glad you bring it up to give me a chance to clarify a set of quick comments I made in my opening remarks that we are comfortable at the lead times we are on. What it is our customers are comfortable seeing our lead time now. What we have found rather remarkable over the last quarter is that even as our lead times remain stable, consistent, the volume of bookings we receive every week continues to grow. I made that comment, and I'm thankful for the opportunity to reiterate that point. Same lead time, stable for last three months, but the booking rate we are seeing every week continues to step up. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Vivek Arya of Bank of America Securities. Your line is open. Thanks for taking my question. Hock, I had another one on the supply situation. If there were no supply constraints, how fast would your semiconductor business be growing? Kind of part B of that is what is driving the shortages for you right now, and what are you doing to resolve it? Do you have any kind of gut feel on when the supply situation will become normal? Thank you. On the first, I'll answer the first and the last. In between, I'm not sure. On the first, we would not put ourselves in a situation, nor should anyone do it, because there's also a certain amount. We do not want our customers, and I don't think any of our peers want to do that either, to buy, to hoard, to create buffers, to buy ahead of what they need. We try to mesh, identify, as I said, and go through a process of rigorously understanding true end demand. In other words, we look for drop-dead quantities, as the term is used in the industry, and we ship to those drop-dead quantities and maybe a little more. What you see today is the true growth rate we are representing. We are not hiding what could have been. There's no what could have been. We're shipping to what we believe customers consider is their true real demand. Having said that, we may be delivering, doing JIT, just in time, but nonetheless, we do try to fulfill what customer truly want just in a timely basis. That still continues today, regardless of the size of the backlog we have. We're disciplined in that regard. From our perspective, the challenges we have in supply chain is the constant set of challenges is to ensure that we get components, whether it's wafers, substrates, getting our product assembled, tested, and any other small components on a timely basis to make sure that we can keep this thing running. If you look at the size of our inventory versus the size of our cost of goods sold or revenue quarterly, you can see that we run pretty close to just in time through our entire supply chain. We've been able to do it and sustain that. What we're reporting to you, like 20% year-on-year growth on semiconductor components is, in our view, a pretty decent reflection what is truly end demand needs out there. All right? Next question. The next question comes from Timothy Arcuri of UBS. Your line is open. Thanks a lot. Hock, I guess I wanted to ask you what you think the long-term growth rate is of your semiconductor business. You're trending to the high teens this year, but that's due to easy comps and you have the compressed iPhone launch and the pull-forward of some of these technologies, due to the pandemic. Once this all sort of normalizes, what do you think is the right long-term growth rate for the business? Are you still thinking 5% or do you think maybe just given the strength of the bookings recently that it could be better than that? Thanks. That's a hell of a question, and I'm telling you this, right now we're in the midst of a very strong demand, and that's also created, perhaps as we all know about, a severe imbalance between demand and supply as supply works to catch up. If you look at it long enough, I think the fundamental dynamics underlying the semiconductor industry hasn't yet changed. At least I haven't seen it to change. Tim, that's the only best answer I can give you, which is I haven't changed my thinking, if you look over the next 10 years, how this industry will behave, because it is a relatively matured industry. It's evolutionary. Technology is still evolving, which is great for us, and it keeps getting better and better, but it's evolving. Disruption, as people like to say in this industry, is less of an event. It's evolutionary, and I have not seen anything that tells me there's a fundamental change. Thanks, Hock. Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach of Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Thanks. Hock, just given the ongoing strength in free cash flow and improved balance sheet, can you just talk about your thoughts on the M&A environment and also and/or buybacks, how you're thinking about cash deployment as you go forward? Yeah, I'll take that one. This is Kirsten. Relative to capital allocation, first and foremost, we're dedicated to paying 50% of our free cash flows to our shareholders. That would be first. Secondly, M&A, if we can, accretive M&A, it would be the second objective. Thirdly, stock buybacks and at the end there would be debt repayments. I think that's how we're looking at capital allocation in that order. There isn't anything yet on the M&A front that I can talk about. If anything does come up, we'll let you know. Thank you. Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis of Barclays. Please go ahead. Hey. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Just curious, a little more detail on the gross margin. I think it's a record gross margin, any color on product or segment? I guess as you look forward here, if you could describe what you're still dealing with in terms of excess costs, due to COVID, and then how to think about it as enterprise comes back, should that be added to the gross margin? I expect gross margin next quarter to be about the same as it was this quarter. As you know, at the end of the year, we're expecting wireless to come back in, for the normal ramp that we have. The margins will come down a bit towards the end of the year. At this point, I see us being able to sustain the margins that we experienced this quarter, mostly coming from networking and broadband. Blayne, at the risk of perhaps repeating myself too much from past conversations that I had with all you guys. Our gross margin has this natural trend of continuing to keep expanding year on year, not necessarily quarter on quarter, but sequentially as much as year on year, simply because we tend to have a chance to go to a new product life cycle, new next generation product across some of our franchise products. It's a combination of all this. The natural growth of expansion of gross margin for our business, especially in the semi side, particularly in the semi side, which I assume your question is related to, Blayne, is, as I've always said, we have a gross margin expansion range of 50 to 150 basis points year by year, and it's an average across our 24, 25 different, well, I should take out software, just hardware, about 20 or so different product lines, each with a different product life cycle and each going to its new generation product each time. As you know, each time it comes to a new generation product, we get a lift in margins, in product margins, which translates to gross margin. It's not unusual to see us go to the higher end of the range. In this particular case year-on-year, it's a bit more than the higher end of the range. That's probably related to perhaps a separate mix of products in this environment because there are still puts and takes across our product range. Not everything is on fire. Based on that, we end up with higher than the normal 50-150 basis point range. I don't think this is something that will go on forever. You should expect that year-after-year, you will see that 50-150 basis point improvement in gross margin on the semiconductor side. Thanks so much. Thank you. Our next question comes from Toshiya Hari of Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Hi, guys. Thank you so much for taking my questions. I had two, actually, one on wireless and one on the cost side. Hock, in terms of wireless, I guess, in Q2, revenue came in better than expected. I just wanted to understand, was that primarily supply being better, or were there dynamics on the demand side that came in better than expected? Sticking to wireless, as you think about the next generation product cycle at your largest customer, how are you thinking about the content opportunity at this point? You pretty much know what's locked in. If you can comment on RF and Wi-Fi and touch, and maybe compare and contrast this uplift in this cycle vis-a-vis past cycles, that would be super helpful. On the cost side, based on the comments you just made about gross margin expansion and some of Kirsten's comments, I doubt cost inflation is having an impact on your business. If you can speak to wafer pricing and substrates and what you're seeing from a cost perspective over the next year or so, that would be super helpful. Thank you. All right. Let's start with the first one. If I lost track of the last two, you better remind me. On wireless, you're right. What I indicated was Q2 wireless was kind of higher than we had originally planned, and a lot related to demand. Of course, it's demand. We will never ship just because we have the product. It's based on demand wanting it, and so we're happy to fulfill it. Part of the demand may actually come a bit from Q3. Not sure 100% yet because demand comes in short cycles, and it may, and perhaps that's why we are a bit careful about telling you Q3 year-on-year improvement is still 30-plus% year-on-year growth. I'm not saying 40-plus, we don't know for sure except we know that we do pull in some from Q3 to Q2, not much, and that allows Q2 to perform that 48% year-on-year growth, which is great. Q3 will still be pretty good year-on-year, as we fully expect. Related to content and all that, I prefer at this point, in this sensitive arena with a highly sensitive situation, to not answer that question at all. No offense, please, I can't answer that question. I'll be happy to take the third question, which is, yeah, we have cost inflation in this environment where, as we all know, the semiconductor supply chain is under severe constraint on its ability to provide. We are a very large customer and a very loyal customer to many of our suppliers of our key components. We believe we are treated very well. Having said that, where prices are concerned, of course not. We see cost inflation, and in this environment, we are very open to talking to our customers who are, in turn, very open to being able to address cost inflationary costs, cost pressure in a higher purchase price on their side. We're good, which is why our margin has been stable. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from C.J. Muse of Evercore. Your line is open. Yeah, good afternoon. Thank you for taking the question. I guess another question on the supply chain, and I guess a bigger picture question, Hock. If you think about your increased lead times, you talked earlier to John's question about selective strategic agreements with key customers. At the same time, we're taking multi-year kind of take or pay contracts with foundries. Curious if you see any structural changes to the semi industry as we kind of emerge post-pandemic? Okay. My frank opinion, I don't know. There shouldn't be. Same question that was asked is, do I think the semiconductor industry over the next 10, 20 years, will grow any faster or slower? My view is no. I don't see any fundamental things that have changed. While we are in the thick of this storm, so to speak, of course, all hell breaks loose, as the expression goes. These are cycles we all have seen many times in the semiconductor industry. Maybe this is a bit extreme in the context of the pandemic over the course of 2020 and now extending partly into 2021. The supply will step up at some point, and demand is always there because people need technology, people need the performance, need the technology that we all offer. The products we provide, we'll be competing the same way we've been competing. It's not necessarily related to creating long-term agreements or any such thing. It's about being able to provide the best technology, the best product in a timely manner for your customers. It doesn't matter that you do any agreements, if at the end of the day, you lack the technology or you lack the products that customers need to make themselves successful or to be able to deploy in a good manner. That has always been the semiconductor industry, and I do not see anything that changes that. Now, putting long-term agreements might make life easier, but I think it's just a myth. We still have to establish ourselves that we can outperform, out-engineer the competition. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Christopher Danely of Citi. Your line is open. Hey, thanks, gang. There's a lot of talk, worries, speculation, I don't know, old wives' tales, whatever, about this big inventory build of handsets in China. Any thoughts there, Hock and team, and what would be the potential impact for Broadcom? Well, not directly. If there's such a big overhang sitting out there, not directly because our wireless business, our wireless products, as we have fully articulated, pretty much sells to two large customers, largely. We're talking about handsets. We do not sell much, if any, to the handset guys, OEMs, that is, in China. We sell to two big customers, one in North America, one in Korea, and these are very high-end, flagship status phones, and that's it. Now, there could be indirect blowback, and that I do recognize in certain markets if there's an excess of inventory that needs to be just thrown out there. On the other side, on a direct basis, we do not expect to see any impact. Okay, thanks, Hock. All right. Thank you. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Ji Yoo for closing remarks. Thank you, operator. In closing, please note that Hock will be presenting at the B of A Securities Technology Conference on Tuesday, June 8th. Following our networking and broadband teach-ins earlier this year, Broadcom and Bernstein will be hosting a teach-in on our storage businesses on Wednesday, July 21st at 12:00 P.M. Eastern, 9:00 A.M. Pacific. Hock will be joined by Jas Tremblay, General Manager of our Server Storage Connectivity business, Jack Rondoni, General Manager of our SAN business, and Dan Dolan, Marketing Head of our Hard Disk Drive business. That will conclude our earnings call today. Thank you all for joining. Operator, you may end the call. Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.