Good day. Welcome to the AvePoint, Inc. Q1 2026 earnings call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by 0. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jamie Arestia in Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to AvePoint's first quarter 2026 earnings call. With me on the call this afternoon is Dr. TJ Jiang, Chief Executive Officer, and Jim Caci, Chief Financial Officer. After preliminary remarks, we will open the call for a question and answer session. Please note that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statements contained in our press release for a more complete description. All material in the webcast is the sole property and copyright of AvePoint with all rights reserved. Please note this presentation describes certain non-GAAP measures, including non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income, and non-GAAP operating margin, which are not measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The non-GAAP measures are presented in this presentation as we believe they provide investors with a means of understanding how management evaluates the company's operating performance. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation from, as substitutes for, or superior to financial measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. A reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is available in our first quarter 2026 earnings press release, as well as our updated investor presentation and financial tables, all of which are available on our investor relations website. With that, let me turn the call over to TJ. Thank you, Jamie Arestia. And thank you to everyone joining us on the call today. Q1 was a strong start to the year. Our leadership at a critical intersection of data protection and security, combined with a growing demand for AI-ready solutions, allowed us to again exceed our guidance on both the top and bottom line. Q1 also marks our 12th straight quarter of double-digit growth in organic net new ARR, which we delivered while driving more than 730 basis points of GAAP operating margin expansion. Importantly, we're delivering strong results during a rapid shift in the market. It wasn't long ago that AI discussions with customers focused entirely on models and productivity gains. As AI is becoming deployed more widely and evolves from assistance to autonomous agents, data access increases exponentially and data governance becomes top of mind. Today, when I meet with customers and partners globally, the question is no longer, "What can AI do for my organization?" Rather, "Can I trust, govern, and operate AI safely and at scale?" In short, the conversation has pivoted away from productivity and towards something far more important, enterprise trust in this new, enormously powerful technology. This is where I would like to focus my time today, how organizations can achieve this level of confidence, and why AvePoint is uniquely positioned to deliver on this demand. To answer this question, it's first important to understand the AI stack today, which starts with infrastructure, energy, chips, physical compute hardware, and so on. These components are important, but it's also fair to say that they are table stakes today and are quickly becoming commoditized. The real center of gravity, not surprisingly, has shifted to data. The knowledge that powers AI and fuels the next two layers, AI models and agentic AI. For every organization, it's here where value is created, but it's also where risk multiplies because every AI system inherits and leverages what sits underneath it, and weak data governance and poor data controls lead to bad decisions and security risks, in turn destroying trust. Ultimately, once trust is lost, AI doesn't scale. This is critical because as AI agents operate more autonomously across enterprise productivity apps, companies truly need a trust layer so that they can scale AI adoption without losing control of data security, privacy, and compliance. It's equally critical to understand why it's different now and what exactly has changed for enterprises seeking to govern data. At a high level, the most commonly leveraged productivity tools today, like Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, and others, were originally designed for human productivity and not autonomous AI execution. As a result, with a rapid emergence of AI tools that are processing more information at greater speeds and scale than ever before, data governance must also evolve. This is exactly where AvePoint comes in, and the customer demand for this trust is the real AI opportunity we see. It's why we're building the trust layer for AI, spanning data, governance, risk, and operations so that organizations can deploy AI securely, responsibly, and with confidence. We believe that organizations can only trust AI when they prioritize three things. First, precisely control what AI can access. Second, govern and audit every action AI takes. Finally, recover instantly when something goes wrong. This trust layer must do all of these continuously, all while maintaining data lineage across both unstructured and structured data sources. The resulting contextual data is an enormous competitive advantage for AvePoint and truly distinguishes us from legacy point solutions and backup-first vendors. This differentiation was also recently validated by Gartner, who specifically cited AvePoint's comprehensive set of capabilities and platform strategy as superior to native offerings like Microsoft's Agent 365. Let me bring this to life by discussing our integrated approach, along with some specific capabilities and recent enhancements to our platform. First, We offer unified real-time visibility across the entire data estate, including what AI agents touch and how access patterns change. New this quarter, organizations can now see across their entire agent stack, including Copilot Studio, Microsoft Foundry, SharePoint Agents, and Gemini Enterprise, all within one screen in Agent Pulse. Second, govern. Our platform provides automated policy enforcement, compliance standards, and access controls across every environment and workload, including AI agents acting as virtual employees. This quarter, we launched a new risk definition for AI agents, so organizations can better access more information about agent security and correct problems automatically. This is especially critical because unmanaged agents can lead to runaway costs and expose sensitive data without proper oversight. Lastly, recover. We ensure granular automated recovery from any failure, whether caused by ransomware, human error, or autonomous AI activity. The speed with which we can do this is unmatched, as we can often recover several petabytes of data per hour. Lastly, we made significant investments into Google Cloud protection this quarter and recently added multi-SaaS backup sources like Okta, Confluence, Jira, DocuSign, monday.com, GitHub, and Smartsheet, adding to our growing library of protected data. This integrated approach, see, govern, and recover is powerful because it transforms AI risk into a manageable variable and ensures that the trust layer is a foundation for AI-driven growth. It is resonating across the market, firmly cementing AvePoint as a foundational infrastructure that enables safe AI deployment at scale. A great example of this is a U.S. pharmacy benefits manager that became a new AvePoint customer in Q1. They wanted to roll out Copilot but knew they faced data sprawl issues with little visibility and control over 500 terabytes of unclassified data. Seeking a single vendor who could address multiple strategic use cases, they purchased our highest tier control bundle along with Opus from our Resilience Suite. Ultimately choosing AvePoint because our automated governance, lifecycle, and access controls would enable them to deploy Copilot with confidence and streamline the regulatory audits they face on a regular basis. They also plan to use our Modernization Suite for future data consolidation efforts aimed at reducing their tech debt and retiring their on-prem footprint. The customer need to rapidly address multiple strategic use cases is extremely common today given the number of ecosystems and applications our customers are using. The ability of our platform to protect and govern data regardless of where it resides is a unique competitive advantage. This was a driver for a large transportation and logistics conglomerate, which initially engaged AvePoint during the pandemic to decommission a on-premises data center and migrate roughly 50 TB of file share data to Microsoft 365. This effort went beyond a basic migration. The customer needed to preserve permissions, retention policies, and governance while modernizing their environment. AvePoint supported this transformation with capabilities spanning modernization, control, and resilience, enabling a secure transition to the cloud with strong governance and operational oversight. As the customer's environment matured, the relationship expanded to include broader governance and data protection. In 2025, when the customer began planning a shift from Microsoft 365 to Google Workspace, AvePoint's multi-cloud capabilities became increasingly strategic. The platform helped prepare data for transition through classification, policy management, insights, and cleanup, ultimately leading to a Q4 2025 award for data transformation services supporting the move. Rather than being displaced, AvePoint's role strengthened, providing consistent governance and resilience across cloud environments. This foundation also supports the customer's AI readiness as they adopt Google Workspace and Gemini, ensuring data is trusted, controlled, and recoverable. Lastly, the foundation enables real-time situation awareness for the customer, where our platform's advanced reasoning can identify and surface urgent logistics action items, such as a delayed shipment or a unread thread about critical rate change before it is too late. Looking ahead to a planned 2027 migration into the parent company's Google tenant, the engagement exemplifies AvePoint's land and expand strategy, evolving from modernization to a strategic platform for multi-cloud governance, resilience, and AI-enabled collaboration. This need for integrated platform solutions that deliver rapid automated value against multiple strategic use cases is only growing, especially in the highly regulated industry that represents the majority of our business. For example, effective data governance in the healthcare industry is more than better visibility and oversight. It's about patient safety, regulatory compliance, and operational resilience. One of our largest customer recently shared that bundling Agent Policy within the broader governance capabilities of our Control Suite has provided them visibility into thousands of agents without having to make a separate business case related to their M365 deployment. We're hearing similar feedback from partners. Our latest report, conducted in partnership with Omdia, the leading global channel technology market research firm, revealed that nearly half of MSPs want a complete platform integrated with other core tools, and 91% say that integrating cloud backup and disaster recovery delivers stronger data governance than offering them separately. We saw this many times in Q1 with existing customers who added to their AvePoint deployments, and we continue to believe that our nearly 30,000 customers still represent an enormous growth opportunity for us. For example, an Austrian luxury goods conglomerate that already owned Opus needed to ensure business continuity as well as tailored, lengthier retention policies for their data in M365. With native capabilities not allowing for this level of customization, they purchased cloud backup from our Resilience Suite in Q1, and we're now discussing the many strategic use cases that can be addressed with our Control Suite. Despite the noise across the software space for the last few quarters, our strategic priorities have not changed, and our growing conviction in our 2029 goal of $1 billion in ARR remains as strong as ever. The relentless growth of data and the growing demand for platform solutions that enable AI deployment at scale will ensure that AvePoint remains a top priority for enterprises around the world. We're excited for a strong 2026. Thank you again for joining us today. I'll now turn it over to Jim. Thanks, TJ, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us today. Our first quarter results were an excellent start to the year and a continuation of the healthy momentum and market demand with which we closed 2025. As I discussed last quarter, very few software companies have AvePoint's organic growth profile, scaling operating margins and GAAP profitability, material cash flow generation, and healthy SaaS KPIs. Our Q1 results once again highlight these strengths and demonstrate our ability to consistently execute on our commitments to shareholders. Let's turn to the quarter. Total revenues in Q1 were $117.2 million, representing 26% growth year-over-year and above the high end of our guidance. On a constant currency basis, total revenues grew 20% year-over-year. SaaS revenues were $93.4 million, growing 35% year-over-year and representing 80% of total Q1 revenues, surpassing last quarter's record and exceeding our mix expectations. On a constant currency basis, SaaS revenues grew 29% year-over-year. Term license and support revenues declined 29% year-over-year and represented 8% of Q1 revenues compared to 12% a year ago. I would also point out that beginning this quarter, we are now including our legacy maintenance revenues in the term license and support revenue line item for all periods presented, given that maintenance is immaterial now to our total revenues. Lastly, services revenues grew 33% year-over-year to $14.5 million, representing 12% of Q1 revenues. As a result, 88% of our Q1 revenues were recurring. On a constant currency basis, services revenues grew 27% year-over-year. Our healthy momentum is also evident when we look at revenue performance by regions. In North America, total revenue growth was 21% year-over-year, driven by SaaS revenue growth of 32%. In EMEA, total revenue growth was 30% year-over-year, driven by SaaS revenue growth of 39%. In APAC, total revenues grew 28% year-over-year, driven by SaaS revenue growth of 37% and services revenue growth of 46%. On a constant currency basis, EMEA SaaS revenues increased 26%, while total revenues increased 18%. For APAC, SaaS revenues increased 32% on a constant currency basis, while total revenues increased 22%. The same top-line strength by region is evident when looking at ARR. In Q1, North America ARR grew 21%, EMEA ARR grew 32%, and APAC ARR grew 27% as we ended the quarter with total ARR of $435.2 million. This represents year-over-year growth of 26% or 23% after adjusting for FX. As a result, net new ARR in Q1 was $18.4 million, representing growth of 17% year-over-year after excluding the $2.8 million of the ARR that was acquired in Q1 of last year. As TJ mentioned, this was our 12th straight quarter of double-digit growth in net new ARR. Lastly, as of the end of Q1, 58% of total ARR came through the channel compared to 55% a year ago. Last quarter, we called out our consistent success at the enterprise level, this momentum continued in Q1. We ended the quarter with 863 customers with ARR of over $100,000, a year-over-year increase of 25%, an acceleration from last quarter's record. We are pleased that the growth rates for our larger customer cohorts were all higher than the 25% growth from our 100K cohort, demonstrating that we continue to meet the demands of the highly complex organizations looking for single platform vendors that can address multiple strategic use cases. Turning now to our customer retention rates. Adjusted for the impact of FX, our Q1 gross retention rate was 89%, a 1-point improvement from Q4, while our Q1 net retention rate of 110% was in line with Q4. Similar to prior quarters, our migration products again served as a 2-point headwind to GRR given their naturally lower retention rates. We would not be surprised to see this dynamic continue, especially given the recent elevated demand for migrations we called out last quarter. On a reported basis, Q1 GRR was 89% and NRR was 111%. Turning back to the income statement, gross profit for Q1 was $86.1 million, representing a gross margin of 73.4% compared to 75% a year ago. The year-over-year gross margin decline is primarily the result of lower gross margins on our services revenue this year versus a year ago. Moving down the income statement, operating expenses in Q1 totaled $65.6 million or 56% of revenues compared to $56.5 million or 61% of revenues a year ago. Q1 non-GAAP operating income was $20.5 million, representing a 17.5% operating margin as well as year-over-year expansion of 310 basis points. Importantly, our ongoing management of stock-based compensation, which was 6% of Q1 revenues, has driven an even stronger expansion of our GAAP operating margins, which were just under 11% in the quarter and expanded more than 730 basis points year-over-year. Taken together, these results demonstrate that our investment year is not a retreat from profitability and proves that we can fund our AI roadmap while simultaneously delivering meaningful leverage across the business. On a Rule of 40 basis, which for AvePoint is the sum of ARR growth and non-GAAP operating margin, we finished Q1 at the Rule of 43. Using the more traditional Rule of 40 components of revenue growth and free cash flow margin, we finished Q1 at the Rule of 51. Turning to the balance sheet and cash flow statement, we ended the quarter with $444 million in cash and cash equivalents. For Q1, operating cash flow was $24.3 million or a 21% margin, while free cash flow was $23 million or a 20% margin. This compares to operating cash flow of $500,000 and free cash flow of a negative $1 million a year ago. Last quarter, we discussed the acceleration of our share repurchases, reflecting our belief in the underlying strength of the business and commitment to driving shareholder value. This increased pace continued in Q1 as we repurchased 5.4 million shares for approximately $60.8 million. For reference, we spent approximately $50 million on share repurchases in all of 2025. Through the close of trading on Friday, we have bought another 1.8 million shares for approximately $17.7 million. Given the increased pace of our buying, our board of directors has authorized the replenishment of our existing share repurchase program back to $150 million. I'd like to make two additional points on our repurchases, which remain a key pillar of our capital allocation framework. First, they have minimized the dilutive effects that we see from the issuance of shares to employees. Second, we are generating meaningful cash flow even after accounting for repurchases, as our cumulative free cash flow after share buybacks over the last three full years is approximately $78 million. Turning now to our guidance, where I want to provide some color. First, we are raising our full-year guidance for ARR, which reflects our momentum and healthy demand we see. Second, our updated full year guidance for revenue and non-GAAP operating income only includes the Q1 outperformance relative to guidance as we account for the increased SaaS mix we now expect for the balance of the year and the impact it may have on reported revenues. The last point is around FX, where the global nature of our business exposes us to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and the currency headwind we saw in Q1 from the strengthening dollar has continued in Q2. The corresponding incremental FX headwinds we expect for the rest of the year are also reflected in our updated full year guidance and more than offset the ARR raise and the Q1 outperformance. We have included a slide in our investor presentation that outlines this progression from our original guidance to today's updated outlook. As a result, for the second quarter, we expect total revenues of $120.3 million-$122.3 million or growth of 19% at the midpoint. On a constant currency basis, we expect revenue growth of 18% at the midpoint. We expect non-GAAP operating income of $18.7 million-$19.7 million. For the full year, we now expect total ARR of $523.4 million-$529.4 million or growth of 26% at the midpoint. This includes a half a million dollar raise from our prior guidance, offset by an FX headwind of $2.2 million. On an FX-adjusted basis, we continue to expect total ARR growth of 26% at the midpoint. We now expect total revenues of $509.4 million-$515.4 million or growth of 22% at the midpoint. This includes the Q1 beat of $1.8 million, offset by an FX headwind of $2.9 million. On a constant currency basis, we expect revenue growth of 20% at the midpoint. Lastly, we now expect full year non-GAAP operating income of $91.5 million to $94.5 million, which includes the Q1 beat of $700,000, offset by an FX headwind of $2.2 million. On a Rule of 40 basis, the midpoint of our updated full year guidance is 44%. In summary, we are proud of the team's strong start to the year. We are excited for a strong Q2 in 2026, as we are well-positioned to capitalize on the enormous market opportunity we see. Thanks for joining us today. With that, we would be happy to take your questions. Operator? Yes. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. At any time your question has been addressed and you'd like to withdraw it, please press star then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble the roster. The first question comes from Joseph Gallo with Jefferies. Hey, guys. Thanks for the question. Can you just unpack the 1Q performance a little bit? Was the 23% constant currency ARR growth in line with your expectations? I assume so, given you modestly raised the full year, which is really impressive. Then just maybe walk us through the confidence in that acceleration from 23% to 26% constant currency throughout the year. Yeah. Thanks, Joe. You know, yes, short answer is, right in line with our expectations, coming off of, you know, just really providing that guidance in February, at the end of February. No real surprise. Obviously little FX impact, but pretty much right in line with what we expected. When we think about the full year kind of accelerating from that 23 to 26, you know, one of the key things for us is that you may recall last year, we definitely had a lot of uncertainty, and it was a tough year for our U.S. public sector. Now, obviously, our public sector is a global business, but we definitely saw some softness last year in our U.S. public sector, particularly in the federal space. What we're seeing this year and we're already seeing in Q2, is some traction, some pickup. Our pipeline is growing. We see some nice growth rate that's gonna propel really the second half of the year, particularly in public sector. That definitely is an impact, and it gives us the confidence today to sit here and see that we have a pathway to that 26% growth. Awesome. That's great to hear. Then just as a follow-up, you know, TJ, you've been tremendously bullish on the potential of AI this quarter, last quarter, quarters before that. I think the last disclosure you gave was Control Suite was growing 18%, you know, year over year ARR in 4Q. Are we seeing a rebound in those growth rates? Or as investors, what metrics should we be monitoring that correlate with the positive AI message that you're articulating? That's a great question. First of all, AI is the tailwind for us as we play the infrastructure layer. We talk about the trust layer in the prepared remarks, above the energy, the chips and the data and right beneath the corporate fine-tuned training model, and then, of course, AI and workflows. That's the space that we operate, and we're very comfortable in that space to do the end-to-end data curation, management, governance. It's really pervasive across our entire AOS platform. Now, we did announce AgentPulse that's driving a ton of interest and also actual results. Nearly half of our pipeline now is the Control Suite. It's really lifting up our overall significance around the end-to-end multi-cloud, agent discovery, agent management, agent cost management, as well as ultimately, shutting down our rogue agents, as well as recovering from damages potentially done by agents. Really we see ourself as the only end-to-end players in that space to help our customers gain confidence and trust into their enterprise AI deployments. Thank you. Thanks you. Thank you. The next question comes from Shrenik Kothari with Baird. Hey. Yeah. Thanks a lot for taking my question. TJ, you mentioned about the expanded protection into Okta, this bunch of Atlassian offerings, Cosmos DB, et cetera. How should we think about both the overall TAM expansion across the SaaS identity and developer estates as well as potential timing of how this opportunity plays out? I had a quick follow-up for Jim. Yeah, that's a great question. Firstly, the reason we supported all these multi sources is because that's what we see with our customers. Our customers are multi-cloud, and they also leverage different vendors for different aspects of their data repositories and enterprise needs. We actually see the demand very strong, especially you talk about timing, right? In Q1, when the height of the conflict in Middle East, many of our MENA as well as Middle East, North Africa, as well as European customers are very, very keenly aware on the data resiliency aspect of it. We actually see tremendous demand in those markets. More demand, not less, for resiliency and also into these new data sources. It's actually a very good, positive movement for us in that regard as part of our overall platform to drive, entire life cycle of resiliency. That's super helpful. Appreciate that, TJ. Just a quick follow-up, and TJ and Jim, like if AI governance, and you went into great detail, it's increasingly mapping to a lot of great outcomes, right? Across your offerings, including lower storage, better audit readiness, also reducing Agent spend. How do you think about the value capture? I know you have mentioned about potential outcome-based approach, and packaging optimization. Where should this consumption or outcome-based pricing first become material? If you can give some anecdotes. Thanks. Yeah. We actually do more services now as well, as you saw in the Q1 pickup. That's really focused around AI modernization efforts. What our customers discover and our partners is that, given our pedigree and our capabilities around data estate curation, management, governance, we actually help them lead to a much faster, positive and confident AI deployment outcomes. The services component is part of that. It also allow us to stay very close to the customer to see where really the market is moving. Different geos have different characteristics because we do cover the globe. We're very positive and confident in continuing that type of outcome as a service type of engagement to stay close to the customer. In terms of licensing, we follow the market makers. In the productivity side, whether it's Office 365 or Google Workspace, it's very much the whole market is C-based licensing. On the compute side, whether it's GCP, whether it's Azure, whether it's AWS, that's very much consumption-based. What we look at is IaaS, infrastructure as a service, PaaS, platform as a service, and of course, very much all the agentic work that's very much running on the compute side. That's the consumption side. Of course, we're layering our service outcome as a service capabilities to help our customers modernize AI. I will also say we see the greatest demand from a regulated industry because they fundamentally understand this problem set. Rest of the market is still taking time to reach that keen awareness of the need for proper end-to-end data management governance. The regulated industry are moving rather quickly, and we see the chunk of the larger deal engagement happening there. That's we continue to see a tailwind. Great. Thanks a lot. Appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Erik Suppiger with, B. Riley Securities. Thanks for taking the question. As customers start adopting AI agents, is there a difference in the way that they prioritize securing primary data versus secondary data? I think, I was just with a sizable customer yesterday, and I think the priority of priorities is to guard against and, make sure that they, you know, enterprises have a handle on now the shadow AI. Everyone, many people, employees within the organization are doing, you know, AI, you know, vibe coding, standing up, AI agents with whatever commercial off-the-shelf, you know, offering there are out there. That is something that everyone really focus on. First step is to audit and discover and of course bring those agentic processes under control, and that's what we see. And also your question around data. If fundamentally the AI enterprise deployment does ground on good data, when we see these data silos that's happening and messy data, ROT data, redundant out of date trivial data, that does lead to inferior outcome when it comes to AI. We really focus around unstructured data, really helping enterprises looking at across their unstructured data repository, which is again 80% of all data out there. That's emails, that's chats, that's files, that's contracts, and that's also the type of data that gen AI is very good at in sifting through, ingest, and be able to inference intelligence out of. It's also that corpus of data sets that need to be better curated, better governed, so from a risk and compliance perspective, enterprise have more confidence in that AI deployment. Very good. Thank you. Thanks, Erik. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Todd Weller with Stephens. Thanks for taking the question. Could you elaborate on the durability demand you're seeing in the Resilience segment? Kind of break down how much growth is coming from new customers versus expansion? Also tie into that the bundling strategy and how that's influencing deal sizes and growth? Thank you. Yeah, I'll comment the first part, and then I'll let Jim talk about the financial details. We see very robust growth in the resiliency side, especially as my earlier commentary in the EMEA territories, given the heightened awareness of resiliency when Azure, when the hyperscaler data centers, in this case AWS, are taken offline. That increases that awareness of failover resiliency. Of course, almost every other day we read about AI, rogue agents going out there and destroying certain significant segment of enterprise infrastructure when it comes to data. That's also very top of mind for our customers. The demand for resiliency is very high. We have to cap that as it's part of our platform. We view ourself as the really the only vendor out there that does the end-to-end, not only the resiliency, the recover bit, but also obviously the control, lifecycle management, governance, curation of data, but also importantly governance, agentic agents and raising awareness on the cost. The agent cost is actually another very big topic across our enterprise all customers. Because if you're not monitoring the agents, it will go chew up as many tokens as you allow it to consume. Agent and token consumption, token optimization is now a very large topic. It's rolled into this whole AI governance topic as well. Then maybe the other piece to that question about how much is coming from existing customers versus new customers. You know, if you look in general across all our products, we're roughly 60%+ is coming from our existing, or I would say new ARR is coming from our existing customers, so about 60%+, with the balance coming from new customers. Obviously, that fluctuates from quarter to quarter, but I would say in resilience, we're roughly in that same category, same range. Again, that does fluctuate from quarter to quarter, but I would use that as kind of like a baseline. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Derrick Wood with TD Cowen. Great. Thanks, guys. TJ, just wanted to touch on Microsoft starting to see some inflecting adoption of Copilot. They had 5 million seat adds last quarter. Could you give us a sense as to how you've been able to participate in this accelerated activity and if this is driving stronger pipelines? Or is demand kind of being brought more into the Azure AI Studio type of environments? That's a great question. I think 5 million is still a very small fraction of the total deployment seats for M365. We actually see far more what you refer to as the latter. The Copilot Studio deployment of AI for specific use cases. Same thing across Google Workspace. Google Gemini, it's a very robust growth especially in enterprise as well, now in U.S. public sector. We actually see across the spectrum of AI deployments and adoption. That's very exciting. That's very much a tailwind that we actually get involved in. It's more of the overall AI adoption and evolution rather than the specific Office Copilot deployment numbers that's driving our growth. Helpful. Thanks. Jim, maybe one for you. You talked about SaaS mix shift this year, versus maybe what you were originally thinking. Can you double-click on that and why it would be higher and what that means in terms of the impact of the on-prem business? Sure. I'm glad you brought it up, Derrick. Yeah. We noticed that in Q1, definitely the business that was closing, more of that was showing up as SaaS in terms of just the dynamics, as opposed to us having to do, you know, revenue recognition as a term license. What that means in the short term is that you're recognizing less revenue up front. If you remember in that term license scenario, you have a larger percentage recognized immediately, and then a smaller percentage recognized ratably over the rest of the contract. Obviously, in the SaaS environment, it's ratable over the whole term. When that happens, when we see more of a shift, or in our case, even from a budgeting point of view, we have to make an assumption as to what that split is going to be on new business. We were assuming a higher percentage of term, which would have resulted in more revenue in the short term. Now this is a good thing long term for us. We want to see more ratable revenue. Makes it easier to predict, easier to forecast. In the short term, and even in our guidance for not only Q2 but Q3, we've kind of assumed that this new paradigm for at least what we saw in Q1 would be fairly consistent for the rest of the year. As a result, the revenue is not gonna be what we expected it to be, which is why you see me not raising guidance. I would have liked to have been in a position to raise guidance for revenue matching what we did with ARR. Because of this mix, I'm actually gonna see less of that revenue anticipated growth. We've kinda left guidance the same because we're actually seeing, as TJ mentioned, some additional services revenue, which is nice, and it's above what we had budgeted. That's a little bit of an offset. This mix shift definitely will result in less revenue coming from the products in the short term. Obviously, long term, it all evens out. Thank you. Thanks, Derrick. Thank you. The next question comes from Kirk Materne with Evercore. Hi, this is Vinod Srinivasan. Dialing in for Kirk. Two questions for me. First, as you're kinda going, you know, undergoing that shift to a channel-first approach, can you give us a sense of how channel partner economics have evolved over time, and how are you kinda balancing that with how you compensate your direct sales force? That's a great question. Channel, we do embrace channel-first strategy, especially in the medium to small customer segments. That's roughly now 50% of our overall recurring business. Even in enterprise now we're picking up regional SIs as channel partners, we're looking at some even bigger size SIs as go-to-market. Within the channel, there's also the managed service providers as a massive uplift for us, highly sticky segment as intermediary to getting to SMB. We do have a comp neutral philosophy. Our sales orgs are encouraged and embrace our channel as a force multiplier. Overall, the economics of it continue to be fantastic because, as we always cited, when we went public in July 2021, our cost of sales and marketing is 41% of our revenue. Latest quarter, it's just hovering around 31%. All of that improvement, we credit, majority of that is to our channel efficiency. We'll continue to drive that channel efficiency because channels will allow us to scale. Also, importantly, we give much of the simpler, service workloads, the data migrations and those type of services to the channel. That would then generate service opportunities for the channel. In the MSP segment, we have our large channel partners citing that for every $1 that they spend on our software, they generate $5 of service opportunities for them to better help their customers. That's the incentive really for the channel, is to drive additional revenue growth in terms of service revenue for our channel partners. Overall, the economic model is a nice flywheel. It's growing in all regions. We now see really nice uptake in LATAM. Of course also in India and in Middle East, we're doing super well, and all of that is very much channel first, channel led strategy. Thanks. That's helpful. Just one last one for me. As you move to that hybrid seat and, you know, kind of outcome consumption-based pricing model, how do you expect that will impact NRR and kind of revenue predictability, over the next, like, 1-2 years? Do you expect you have to kinda change your guidance philosophy, maybe widen it over time as a result of that, or no? We don't think so. The outcome-based services is really to do the AI modernization, help our customers to really be able to first get their data estate house in order and then help them implement a lot of these AI modernization initiatives. That's going super well. That's our way to stay close to the customer. We always have a portion of our business, now roughly about 12%, that's really focused on this top-tier enterprise customers, public sector, in term of that service capabilities and delivery. That has always been our IT generation engine, and today it's our engine to stay very close to the customer to see where the market's going. The market is highly disrupted. We all know, right? In reality, no one really know what does the market look like 2 years, 3 years out. It's super important for product companies like us that's really have a global footprint to have in every region that we operate in, a advanced service capability. Now it's really outcome as a service delivery model to provide that premium service capabilities to stick close to the AI initiatives. That's how we continue to stay very agile and stay in the leading edge of the tech disruption. That doesn't actually impact. It's only a leading edge, right? The overall 88% of the business is still very much a cloud business. It's a subscription business. Again, as I mentioned earlier, the market makers, the hyperscalers, they kind of determine the paradigm of licensing, whether it's C count-based or consumption-based. We see that model to be gonna be that state of things for the time to come. We don't see that being very different, at least not in the medium term. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Joe Vandrick with Scotiabank. Thanks for the question. TJ, did I hear you say that nearly half the pipeline is coming from the Control Suite today? Just wanted to clarify that that's right, since I think that's about a quarter of the business as of Q4. That is correct. Last quarter, actually, well over a quarter of new closed pipe deals are Control. Now, 50% of the pipeline are created with Control. Governance of AI, governance of data, it's very, very much top of mind for customers. Okay. That's great to hear. Then maybe one for Jim. Can you talk a little bit about the investments you're making in 2026? Is sales and marketing the main focus for incremental investments just to capture the large market opportunity? How are you measuring ROI there? Hi, Joe. I think you're right. You're spot on. You can even see it in Q1, the step up in our marketing spend. Definitely been a key focus, you know, both sales and marketing. You know, TJ mentioned obviously we're getting, you know, really good leverage from the channel, that doesn't mean that we're not continuing to invest in our direct teams as well, 'cause we are. We're actually able to do both. We're making nice investments there, both in people, technology, and really looking to scale that group. You know, our goal is not to execute just for 2026, but to get to this goal of 2029. We're making investments really this year that are gonna propel the business, you know, well beyond 26. We're doing that across the board, and it's some of the marketing initiatives that we're invested in as well, everything from the account-based programs that we have, all the way to some brand initiatives that we've taken on this year. You know, again, it's a big focus for us, again, focused on really delivering for 2029 and taking advantage of the, you know, the market opportunity that you mentioned. We're doing that. In terms of ROI, obviously some of these are more tangible than others, but, you know, we review these on a periodic basis to make sure that we're, you know, getting the expectations. Some of that translates to immediate results. Some of it is more other maybe softer metrics today that lead to those harder metrics later. Again, we're on top of it. We're making those investments. We believe they're required today to hit those goals in the long term. Great. Thank you. Thanks, Joe. Thank you. Next question comes from Steven Brunner with Northland Capital Markets. Jim, I'm wondering if you could kinda go through your expectations for free cash flow for 2026 and, you know, kind of what the cadence and sizing of repurchases and your overall capital allocation plan for the year is. Thanks for the question. You know, when we think about capital allocation, we've talked about this ad infinitum. We really think of it as three different pillars. Obviously, we wanna invest in the business itself to make sure that our teams are well-equipped, well-staffed and can execute to the absolute maximum that they can. We wanna first ensure that the business has the resources to do that, and that's first and foremost. Second is we do wanna look at opportunities for to supplement our internal growth with M&A activities. We have active discussions all year long with a number of target opportunities. M&A is a vital strategy for us. We've done small acquisitions in the past. We've talked about potentially doing larger acquisitions. That fits into our capital allocation strategy, and we're constantly looking at those deals and making sure that we have proper capital allocated to be able to execute. The third is obviously the repurchases you mentioned. We've obviously, you know, as we talked about earlier, stepped up our buying not only in Q4, but we continued that in Q1 and the beginning of Q2. We have the ability, fortunately with our strong balance sheet, to be able to execute on a variety of these capital allocation strategies and not just one. That's been really good. We'll continue to do that. When we think about how much we're going to do in terms of repurchases, I get this question a lot. I think that's something we're continuously evaluating, and it's in the context of the other two pillars that I mentioned. If an M&A opportunity comes along or if we're looking at something, we may dial back repurchases, we may accelerate. We kinda look at it as flexible and taking advantage of the opportunities that present themselves to us. When we think about free cash flow, you notice we obviously generated a lot of cash in Q1, and it's really, you know, very good. There are a couple factors that I just wanna point out for our Q1 performance, and it really comes down to three things. If you compare our generation this quarter to a year ago, pretty significant improvement and really dramatic. I think that's three factors. If you looked at our net income in Q1 of this year compared to last year, we have generated an extra $12 million of net income. The business is performing well. That is first and foremost. Second, if you think of Q1 of 2025, we called out that we had some special one-time payments, really tax-related payments in Q1 of 2025 of about $7 million. Again, we did not have those same payments in 2026, so we see some nice benefit from that. The third thing I would call out is that in 2026, we received some customer payments in Q1 that in prior years would have been received in Q4, and that was probably about $6 million. Again, taking all together, the biggest factor is the performance of the business is accelerated, so we feel really good about the cash flow generation. When we think about the full year, I think we're gonna be in line with what we've done in the past, which is we're gonna exceed our operating income in terms of cash flow generation. Right now, we're guiding to the low 90s in terms of non-GAAP operating income. I would expect us to be generating free cash flow north of $100 million for the year. Again, we don't specifically guide to it, but in terms of just in terms of a range and if you're thinking about modeling or anything else, I would say that's the area that I would be shooting. Thanks you. Thank you. This does conclude the question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to TJ Jiang for any closing comments. Thank you for joining us today. We're proud of our first quarter results and raised outlook for the year, which reflects the growing demand for secure, automated, and AI-ready solutions. The increasing strategic importance of our platform and its enablement of AI-driven transformation for companies of all sizes and industries around the world ensures a durable competitive moat for AvePoint and only strengthens our conviction in the enormous market opportunity we see. We're excited for continued momentum in 2026 as we progress toward our $1 billion ARR target. Thank you again for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking with you more this quarter. Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.