Obviously, you've got kind of a very good perspective on just what's going on within the semiconductor industry. It seems like everybody's just talking about kind of the recovery that we're starting to see, more broadly speaking. Maybe just give us your perspective of what you're seeing from a semi-cycle perspective. Are you starting to see signs of a recovery? Maybe just talk about what you're seeing from a bookings, book-to-bill, backlog, and just inventory perspective. Yeah, thanks. I think maybe I'll first point to our Asia business, and we just ended our fiscal year in June. Fiscal 2025 grew roughly 12%. Four straight quarters of growth in Asia. We feel pretty good about that sign, and that was pretty broad-based in terms of the recovery there. Typically in cycles, although this one's been more prolonged than ones in the past, it typically begins in Asia and starts in Asia, and prior to the growth we've seen this last fiscal year, we were down six straight quarters in Asia, year on year. We feel pretty good about that. Again, our Asia business is heavy Taiwan, followed by China, then Asia, and then Japan. I feel pretty good about the recovery there and across multiple end markets. From a book-to-bill perspective, as we exited the June quarter, above parity in Europe and Asia, and then kind of at parity in the Americas. Pretty good sign, right? We've been running below parity in the West, and we feel pretty good about that. We are seeing a lot of orders within lead times, and we call that our turns business. As we get customers within lead times, to us, that's a really good indicator that inventories have been depleted, right? They don't have the inventory on the shelf, and they need it. The backlog is improving. That's just near-term backlog that we see in the turns business, as well as backlog up to 180 days. All those things point to us that we've kind of obviously already had growth in Asia, and we're nearing the bottom here in the West. We're optimistic with our September quarter guidance, you know, s equential growth expected both in Europe and the Americas, although it's modest, it's still not declines. We're looking forward to seeing how things shake out here. September should be a good indicator for us in Europe, as they're on their holidays in July and August, when they come back in September. It gives us a pretty good indicator of how strong the December quarter should be. Great, thanks for that overview. Maybe just one quick clarification. You know, how big is your Asia business? You talked about seeing a heavy turns business. I think a lot of the semiconductor companies at this conference have also commented on that. What do you make on that? Is that kind of unusual at this point in the cycle? Is that also limiting kind of your visibility in some of the out quarters at this point? Yeah, I think, I mean, first of all, right now Asia is roughly 50% of our business, but if you go to, let's say, five quarters ago, it was closer to 40%. What's happened is significant growth in Asia, and then significant declines in primarily Europe, but also in the Americas. We kind of had a mixed swing, which is not necessarily great for us because of the fact that we get a higher margin in the West versus in Asia. The good thing about all of our business units is they're pretty broad-based. We're heavy transportation, heavy industrial. We do have some in the compute and the communications area. I feel pretty good about being broad-based. No single supplier technology accounts for more than 10% of our portfolio. I think we are running into challenges probably over the past year of the semi-companies need customer forecasts to figure out what to build. There's just been a reluctance for probably several reasons of why customers haven't been willing to give us that. I do think some of the increase we're seeing in the backlog is more longer-term visibility outside of lead times, which I think is a good sign. We really still need to be able to dial in what to build. That's part of our role, aggregating that customer demand and giving that visibility to the semiconductor and IP&E partners. We're still encouraging customers, give us your demand, right? Get in line. As demand uptakes, you could see pressure on lead times and things like that. We're not seeing that today, but just because you give us a forecast doesn't mean you're hooked and have to buy the product. I think there's still some reluctance coming out of the forced take kind of environment that they don't want to give us more than they really need. Again, lead times are one thing, but cycle times are much longer. If we run into extended demand, we could run into some challenges. Yeah, that's an interesting point. Several of the companies that you represent that have been presenting at our conference have been saying they've been sending out notifications and letters to their customers, warning them and encouraging them to kind of get ahead of these lead times that could be extending and maybe start placing more orders into backlog. Are you seeing any sort of customer being receptive to that and maybe booking a little bit further out in response to some of these letters that are being sent? Yeah, I think some customers are. I think it's getting more progress, but it's been several quarters we've been asking for that visibility. I guess what I would say is customers that have more near-term demand or where they see that own demand on their side will be more likely to put the orders in, right? Making sure, you know, so customers dealing in the AI space, for example, they know they're running pretty hot. They need to get assurance of supply. It's probably a mixed bag. Some of the larger OEMs are maybe more sophisticated in how they deal with their supply chain. They've got line of sight to some of these things, and there's lots of buffer stock and kind of regional stock that customers can put in place to help mitigate that. I think in general, customers that are viewing the different signals and signs are kind of erring on the side of caution, but there's still some more room to go in terms of that visibility. We've typically had, even going back prior to COVID, we would typically have 180-day plus kind of visibility. We're kind of seeing more near-term, but again, I think progress in the backlog. Great. Maybe can you give us kind of your view on just what you're seeing in terms of demand trends via kind of different end markets right now? Yeah, so this last quarter we saw growth, I would say, in the compute, the communications, and the transportation kind of end markets. From a regional perspective, we're still seeing industrial pretty down. Our Asia and European business is pretty heavy industrial. We have some strength in aerospace defense in the Americas, which has held up relatively good. It's a little bit of a mixed bag. I think Asia in general across all kinds of markets was pretty good for us, and most markets in the West were weaker, but starting to see signs of stability. Our view is the trends are pointing to a positive direction. It still may be a little uncertain of how quickly it recovers and how many more quarters, but I think at least hitting bottom and kind of working our way out from there. It feels pretty good. Again, we think our diversification helps give us not any over-concentration in any one market. Right. You know, a question that I get a lot from investors these days is not just your results, but just broader results. If you look at your results, how much of your results do you think are being driven by tariff-related pull-ins versus just kind of the broader cyclical recovery? I would say, you know, from a financial standpoint, tariffs aren't largely impactful, but it has operationally been a challenge. Our team continued to work really hard to react to announcements and to try to implement, first of all, mitigation techniques, but then secondarily making sure we pass those through if we're incurring a tariff and have to pass it on to a customer so we don't get stuck. I think maybe when you look at regionally in Asia, I would say we've seen a little bit of demand pull-in. That's probably over the past three quarters just due to uncertainty with some of the trade environment. It's less about having to pay a tariff and more about, am I going to be able to get this part into the country? Might as well err on the side of having some stock. We've seen anywhere from $50 million to $100 million in the broader Asia business each quarter for that, we'll call it pull-in from customer uncertainty. Not a whole lot of impact. There's not a lot of U.S. product that we sell that goes into China that's subject to tariffs. I would say our biggest impact is in the Americas with China-produced products, although more countries are becoming part of the tariff regime. This last quarter, about 3% or less than 3% of our Americas sales was actually tariff billings, and globally it's less than 1%. Pretty nominal, a little bit of impact on gross margin, but not much. We still think there's more opportunity to not only mitigate, which is our key priority, to mitigate and try to avoid them, try to sell products where the customers aren't subject to tariffs, but if we do, how do we minimize the tariff? We've got, you know, we can do business in 140 countries. We've got warehouses in Mexico as well as the U.S. Our U.S. warehouse is a foreign trade zone. It's not subject to tariff until it actually ships out of the warehouse if we receive product into the foreign trade zone. There are lots of things we continue to do to help mitigate and minimize the impacts. Okay. Can you talk about more specifically what are some of your mitigation strategies, and also maybe just talk about China, what% of your revenues are from China? We do roughly $10 billion a year in Asia, and about $3 billion of that's earmarked for the China business. Roughly $3 billion, which is 10%, give or take a little bit less than that, or a little bit more than that, sorry. Mitigation techniques start with dual sourcing, working with our supplier partners to figure out if they've got product that's produced in China and produced elsewhere. Bring the China stuff for China and bring the non-China stuff into the U.S., right? Mitigate that way. Secondarily, we would look at where the end location is, right? Although our hub is in the U.S., we wouldn't necessarily bring product in the U.S. if we don't have to. We can bring it in Mexico, other places. Really just trying to optimize the regional footprint and figure out where the end demand is, and so, you know, t he dual sourcing helps a lot. There's been a lot of evaluation as of late with more tariffs coming into place about what the country of origin or country of diffusion is because depending on what that conclusion is, subjects you to a tariff. Again, it's a little bit of a moving target. Our hope is as we get more stability in the tariff space, we can continue to optimize and reduce the impact. Great. Are there any questions? Great. I'm wondering if you could just talk about your gross margin mix across regions. You know, obviously with Asia being such a big percentage of your business, you are seeing a little bit of margin dilution there and it's half of your revenues. What are you trying to do to offset that dilution? I think maybe the important thing to emphasize is, you know, Asia is a critical part of our global footprint and, you know, over time, more and more manufacturing is done there. I still think even in this tariff regime, you know, when you think about a China plus one, it's alternative locations within Asia. You might have Vietnam, you might have Malaysia, you might have India so, Asia is a critical market to us and our supplier partners, right? They've got pretty good concentration there too, and those are key markets where the demand is and where the growth is. How we measure our Asia business is, you know, how do they expand their operating income dollars and how do they get the return on capital? Although, you know, it's a more competitive environment there, there's lots of competition, which tends to yield a lower gross margin, you know, t hey can make up for it in volume and still expand, you know, the key metrics we look at, which is operating income and ROWC. We do believe the West will recover, and therefore they should have higher growth in Asia as that happens. You know again, longer term, you know, perhaps everyone grows together, depending on the end markets and things like that. We do see some tailwinds coming just from some recovery of the West, which has a higher gross margin, which should benefit operating margins as well. The other thing we haven't talked much about is Farnell, which is our high service business, and that commands a really premium margin relative to our core business. We've got some trajectory of growth there that should help the overall portfolio's operating margins. Right. Can you talk about what your long-term operating margin targets are, and what are the levers for you to get there? Yeah, I think in general, you know, with our model, the last couple of years have been sales declines, but you know, it's one of scale. We need to get back our scale in terms of sales growth. We think the end markets we serve, on a medium-term basis, have high single-digit kind of growth rates, at least mid-single digits, but a lot of them, like industrial and even aero-defense, should have higher than that. We believe we're well-positioned to take advantage of that growth. We really have done a good job controlling costs. We were very careful about not going after costs too much in this downturn to cut into the bone, you know, in terms of the sales force, the front-end resources, because we want to be well-positioned to capitalize on the recovery. I think it's a growth story with controlling costs pretty well, and we can drop through a lot of that to the bottom line. Farnell is going to help with that a lot. There's a lot of things in Farnell that we've done. We have corrected the cost model there. There's still a little bit of room to go there, but there's also some revenue synergies we can continue to get out of Farnell. A couple of things I'll point to would be, first, from an e-commerce, it's a high service kind of website-based business. Our conversion rate isn't where it probably should be. We get lots of traffic to not only the Farnell properties, but Avnet properties, but there's still some opportunity to meet industry standards in terms of conversion rate, which, as we improve the website proposition and some of the underlying content, we think we can get there, as well as synergies with the Avnet customer base. There's lots of large-sized customers that Avnet has strong relationships with that Farnell does very little business with. We refer to it as the power one, but really just trying to bring the Farnell high service proposition to some of our best customers and getting some of that share wallet, which is pretty sizable for these big, large customers. Yeah, you brought up Farnell. Can you give us an update on just what you're doing specifically with the Farnell improvement strategy? Maybe just talk about the Farnell operating margins. How do they compare to your overall corporate margins? Yeah. Farnell is our high service business and, you know, think about it as speed and convenience, whereas the core Avnet may sell into the supply chain organizations of a company producing products with electronics. Farnell would typically maybe sell into the engineering group there that's doing the R&D, that's working with the next technology. It's smaller quantities, overnight or two-day kind of delivery cycles. That speed and convenience demands a higher gross margin, right? More like 2 or 3x what the core business does. As kind of the shortage market was occurring, what was happening is people were coming and getting parts from Farnell. It was upping their sales and they were able to command a little bit more premium on the margin. We lost out on some opportunities to look operationally and fix some of the operational things they had going and the tides were kind of rising. Farnell, at its peak, was running north of 30% gross margins as well as north of 14% operating margin and so, w e believe the business and their competition can achieve that again. The first thing we focused on is, with some changes in the management team to really bring in a few more operational efficiencies in terms of the Opex. We took some Opex out and really tried to get the operations right-sized. I really focused on looking for opportunities to continue to grow the business. Farnell is a lot of businesses on the board components, meaning what do you need to create an electronic board, but they're also into test and measurement as well as maintenance and repair type of products. Think about anything an engineer does on their workbench to design or develop a product. They sell all that proposition. Although we've seen steady recovery in some of the test and measurement and maintenance and repair, we have not seen the recovery yet in the on-the-board components. That will command a higher margin as well as the conversion rate we talked about on the e-commerce side of things and the opportunity to cross-sell with Avnet. Those are all tailwinds that we believe are coming our way, but operationally we've fixed a lot of other things, but there's still some room to go there. What percentage of your revenues does Farnell represent? When you think about the growth going forward for Farnell, is there an opportunity for that to see outsized growth, or should we be thinking about what sort of growth? Yeah, I think yes is the answer. Farnell right now represents less than 10% of our business. At its peak, it was 7 or 8% of our business, but 20% of our operating profits. We believe with the Farnell growth is going to come an improvement to the mix. The margins at each product level category are pretty stable there, including for on-the-board components. We have ways to go there. As they get the growth, they'll get the mix improvement as well, which will help gross margins and expand operating margins. I do think with the other initiatives we have within our control, we'll have equal to or higher growth than the core business. Right. Can you talk about where your inventories are? Just given where we are in the cycle, are you contemplating increasing inventories at this point? I wouldn't say we're contemplating increasing inventories. I would still say we have pockets where it's a little excess than where we'd like it to be or relative to the current sales levels. The first priority is continuing to work down the inventory where they're elevated. We know those areas. I would say we've made really good progress, maybe not as quickly as we'd like, but good progress in terms of the composition of the inventory, whether it's aged inventory or pockets that weren't moving. We've been able to turn that over and get to the product categories that we will be able to sell and will enable growth in the business. There's still some room to go there. We think we have enough inventory in terms of dollars to support any near to medium-term growth. We still need to make some progress in getting the right inventory on the shelves. That's continually our challenge: let's make sure we have the right product and only hold as much as we need to support what the customer's needs are. There's still some room to go there, but we did make some progress this year with a little bit more progress to go. Okay, how many days of inventory are you at? We're roughly 94 days of inventory. I think our goal, exiting fiscal 2025, is to have lower than $5 billion of inventory when we started the year. When you normalize for currency, we were about $5 billion, $50 million. So, about $50 million short, but did make some progress towards that. I would say we want our inventory days to be in the 80s as kind of the near-term goal here. It's still going to take a few more quarters to continue to work things out there. We definitely have line of sight and it's a priority for the team. Again, we want to emphasize that, as a distributor, inventory is kind of the lifeblood of our business. We need to have the right inventory to fit customer needs, especially when you talk about this turns business improving where there's near-term customer demand within lead times. If you have that product on the shelf, that yields a sale, and a lot of times that yields a higher margin for us. We want to make sure we're well-positioned, as lead times extend out. If they do, with demand increasing be ready to kind of take our fair share. Right. Can you talk about where you're seeing from a pricing perspective right now? I would say pricing has generally been relatively stable, right? We went through a period where we were having multiple price increases in a given year, but feel that ASPs are pretty steady now. With the demand environment where it's at, I think there's competitive pressures in terms of a customer wants a better deal and shops it. To keep your customer entanglement, you might have to do some things on price, but I think that's i n general, we're seeing puts and takes there, but nothing of note. We think margins overall are pretty stable regionally, but ASPs are holding up, which is good. We don't see anything that would indicate any near-term or even medium-term move to lower ASPs as a wholesale perspective. We've even heard rumblings of price increases in certain specific technologies. We feel really good about, you know, where pricing is at, and, t here was a lot of customer energy and outbursts over, you know, tariffs. Of course, no one wants to pay a tariff. I think we've worked through some of that, although, you know, we still want to minimize the impact of tariffs. We look at it year over year on each region. Gross margins held up pretty good. From fiscal 2025 to fiscal 2024 across all three regions, including Farnell, generally margins holding up pretty well. A little bit of puts and takes, but feel okay about that. Really focused on getting the regional mix improving and just getting back to growth across all regions. Yep. I think the last question for me is just when you think about just competition, can you just talk about from a differentiation perspective, how do you differentiate yourselves from some of the other big distributors out there like Arrow and WPG? Yeah, and there's lots of competition out there, although, you know, it's a big market. I guess our first differentiator I'd point to is Farnell. We're the only broadline global distributor with a high service business, and we do think high service has a long-term future in the broader component supply chain. Farnell is well positioned in Europe, and we've made some investments to make that a better business. Next I'd say our line card, you know, there are nuances with our line card versus some of the competition. We really excel at the high-end technologies and where we do have competing lines. We're usually number one in some of those lines, so we feel pretty good about that. That's been a key focus area for the last several years to really be well positioned with the suppliers. What we need to deliver as a distributor is we need customer count growth and overall revenue growth. If we can deliver those, you know, that we're in good graces with the supplier partners. I do think our leadership team is pretty tenured. We just did announce the transition in Europe. We're excited about that. At the same time, we've had a pretty stable leadership environment at each of our business units, not only in Asia, but in Europe, but also with the CEO. Helm Phil's been with us for 43 years. We think that's important because we understand the value distribution provides, and we're trying to just be the best value a distributor would be, not something that we're not, right? We understand our customer space, understand our supplier space, and want to compete well in the distribution space. I think in markets like Asia, we're a little stronger in Taiwan, which we're comfortable with as a good market, right? Those are probably the key factors I'd point to. Again, you know, we have really good competitors, and I do think there's room in the space for everyone to kind of rise, especially with the proliferation of electronics. Expect over the next several years. Great. Thanks very much, Ken. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Good afternoon, everybody. My name is John Vinh. Ken, maybe just starting off, obviously you've got kind of a very good perspective on just what's going on within the semiconductor industry. It seems like everybody's just talking about kind of the recovery that we're starting to see, more broadly speaking. Maybe just give us your perspective of what you're seeing from a semi-cycle perspective. Are you starting to see signs of a recovery? Maybe just talk about what you're seeing from a bookings, book-to-bill, backlog, and just inventory perspective. Yeah, thanks. I think maybe I'll first point to our Asia book business, and we just ended our fiscal year in June. Fiscal 2025 grew roughly 12%. Four straight quarters of growth in Asia. We feel pretty good about that sign, and it was pretty broad-based in terms of the recovery there. Typically in cycles, although this one's been more prolonged than ones in the past, it typically begins in Asia and starts in Asia. Prior to the growth we've seen this last fiscal year, we were down six straight quarters in Asia, year on year. We feel pretty good about that. Our Asia business is heavy Taiwan, followed by China, then Asia, and then Japan. I feel pretty good about the recovery there and across multiple end markets. From a book-to-bill perspective, as we exited the June quarter, above parity in Europe and Asia, and then kind of at parity in the Americas. Pretty good sign, right? We'd been running below parity in the West, and we feel pretty good about that. We are seeing a lot of orders within lead times, and we call that our turns business. As we get customer orders within lead times, to us, that's a really good indicator that inventories have been depleted, right? They don't have the inventory on the shelf, and they need it and t he backlog is improving. That's just near-term backlog that we see in the turns business, as well as backlog up to 180 days. All those things point to us that we've kind of obviously already had growth in Asia, and we're nearing the bottom here in the West. We're optimistic with our September quarter guidance. Sequential growth expected both in Europe and the Americas, although it's modest, it's still not declines. We're looking forward to seeing how things shake out here. September should be a good indicator for us in Europe, as they're on their holidays in July and August, when they come back in September. It gives us a pretty good indicator of how strong the December quarter should be. Great. Thanks for that overview. Maybe just one quick clarification. You know, how big is your Asia business? You talked about seeing a heavy turns business. I think a lot of the semiconductor companies at this conference have also commented on that. What do you make on that? Is that kind of unusual at this point in the cycle? Is that also limiting kind of your visibility in some of the out quarters at this point? Yeah, I think, I mean, first of all, right now Asia is roughly 50% of our business. If you go to, let's say, five quarters ago, it was closer to 40%. What's happened is significant growth in Asia and then significant declines in primarily Europe, but also in the Americas. We kind of had a mixed swing, which is not necessarily great for us because of the fact that we get a higher margin in the West versus in Asia. The good thing about all of our business units is they're pretty broad-based, you know, w e're heavy transportation, heavy industrial. We do have some in the compute and the communications area. I feel pretty good about being broad-based. No single supplier technology accounts for more than 10% of our portfolio. I think we are running into challenges probably over the past year of the semi-companies need customer forecasts to figure out what to build. There's just been a reluctance for probably several reasons of why customers haven't been willing to give us that. I do think some of the increase we're seeing in the backlog is more longer-term visibility outside of lead times, which I think is a good sign. We really still need to be able to dial in what to build. That's part of our role, aggregating that customer demand and giving that visibility to the semiconductor and IP&E partners. We're still encouraging customers, give us your demand, right? Get in line. As demand upticks, you could see pressure on lead times and things like that. We're not seeing that today. Just because you give us a forecast doesn't mean you're hooked and have to buy the product. I think there's still some reluctance coming out of the forced take kind of environment that they don't want to give us more than they really need. Again, lead times are one thing, but cycle times are much longer. If we run into, you know, extended demand we could run into some challenges. Yeah, that's an interesting point. Several of the companies that you represent that have been presenting at our conference have been saying they've been sending out notifications and letters to their customers, warning them and encouraging them to kind of get ahead of these lead times that could be extending and maybe start placing more orders into backlog. Are you seeing any sort of customer being receptive to that and maybe booking a little bit further out in response to some of these letters that are being sent? Yeah, I think some customers are. I think it's getting more progress, but it's been several quarters we've been asking for that visibility. I guess what I would say is customers that have more, you know, near-term demand or where they see that, you know, own demand on their side will be more likely to put the orders in, right? Making sure, you know, so customers dealing in the AI space, for example, they know they're running pretty hot. They need to get assurance of supply. It's probably a mixed bag. Some of the larger OEMs are maybe more sophisticated in how they deal with their supply chain. They've got line of sight to some of these things, and you know, there's lots of buffer stock and kind of regional stock that customers can put in place to help mitigate that. I think in general, customers that are viewing the different signals and signs are kind of erring on the side of caution, but there's still some more room to go in terms of that visibility. We've typically had, even going back prior to COVID, we would typically have 180-day plus kind of visibility. We're kind of seeing more near-term, but again, I think progress in the backlog. Great. Maybe can you give us kind of your view on just what you're seeing in terms of demand trends via kind of different end markets right now? This last quarter we saw growth, I would say, in the compute, the communications, and the transportation kind of end markets. From a regional perspective, we're still seeing industrial pretty down, you know, o ur Asia and European business is pretty heavy industrial. We have some strength in aerospace defense in the Americas, which has held up relatively good, but It's a little bit of a mixed bag. I think Asia in general across all kinds of markets was pretty good for us. Most markets in the West were weaker, but starting to see signs of stability. Our view is, you know, the trends are pointing to a positive direction. It still may be a little uncertain of how quickly it recovers and how many more quarters, but I think at least hitting bottom and kind of working our way out from there feels pretty good. Again, we think our diversification helps give us not any over-concentration in any one market. Right. You know, a question that I get a lot from investors these days is not just your results, but just broader results. If you look at your results, how much of your results do you think are being driven by tariff-related pull-ins versus just kind of the broader cyclical recovery? I would say, you know, from a financial standpoint, tariffs aren't largely impactful, but it has operationally been a challenge. Our team continued to work really hard to react to announcements and to try to implement, first of all, mitigation techniques, but then secondarily making sure we pass those through if we're incurring a tariff and have to pass it on to a customer so we don't get stuck. I think maybe when you look at regionally in Asia, I would say we've seen a little bit of demand pull-in. That's probably over the past three quarters just due to uncertainty with some of the trade environment. It's less about having to pay a tariff and more about, am I going to be able to get this part into the country? Might as well err on the side of having some stock. We've seen anywhere from $50 million to $100 million in the broader Asia business each quarter for that, we'll call it pull-in from customer uncertainty, but not a whole lot of impact. There's not a lot of U.S. product that we sell that goes into China that's subject to tariffs. I would say our biggest impact is in the Americas with China-produced products, although more countries are becoming part of the tariff regime. This last quarter, about 3% or less than 3% of our Americas sales was actually tariff billings, and globally it's less than 1%. Pretty nominal, a little bit of impact on gross margin, but not much. We still think there's more opportunity to not only mitigate, which is our key priority, is to mitigate and try to avoid them, try to sell products where the customers aren't subject to tariffs, but if we do, how do we minimize the tariff? We've got, you know, we can do business in 140 countries. We've got warehouses in Mexico as well as the U.S. Our U.S. warehouse is a foreign trade zone, so it's not subject to tariff until it actually ships out of the warehouse if we receive product into the foreign trade zone. There are lots of things we can continue to do to help mitigate and minimize the impacts. Okay. Can you talk about more specifically what are some of your mitigation strategies, and also maybe just talk about China, what% of your revenues are from China? We do roughly $10 billion a year in Asia and about $3 billion of that's earmarked for the China business. Roughly $3 billion, which is 10%, give or take a little bit less than that, or a little bit more than that, sorry. Mitigation techniques start with dual sourcing, you know, working with our supplier partners to figure out if they've got product that's produced in China and produced elsewhere. Bring the China stuff for China and bring the non-China stuff into the U.S., right? Mitigate that way. Secondarily, we would look at where the end location is, right? Although our hub is in the U.S., we wouldn't necessarily bring product in the U.S. if we don't have to. We can bring it in Mexico, other places. Really just trying to optimize the regional footprint and figure out where the end demand is. The dual sourcing helps a lot, t here's been a lot of evaluation as of late with more tariffs coming into place about what the country of origin or country of diffusion is because depending on what that conclusion is, subjects you to a tariff. Again, it's a little bit of a moving target. Our hope is as we get more stability in the tariff space, we can continue to optimize and reduce the impact. Great. Are there any questions? Great. I'm wondering if you could just talk about your gross margin mix across regions. You know, obviously with Asia being such a big percentage of your business, you are seeing a little bit of margin dilution there, and it's half of your revenues. What are you trying to do to offset that dilution? I think maybe the important thing to emphasize is, you know, Asia is a critical part of our global footprint. Over time, more and more manufacturing is done there. I still think even in this tariff regime, you know, when you think about a China plus one it's alternative locations within Asia. You might have Vietnam, you might have Malaysia, you might have India. Asia is a critical market to us and our supplier partners, right? They've got pretty good concentration there too, and those are key markets where the demand is and where the growth is. How we measure our Asia business is how do they expand their operating income dollars and how do they get the return on capital? Although it's a more competitive environment there, there's lots of competition, which tends to yield a lower gross margin. They can make up for it in volume and still expand the key metrics we look at, which is operating income and ROWC. We do believe the West will recover, and therefore they should have higher growth than Asia as that happens. Again, longer term, perhaps everyone grows together depending on the end markets and things like that. We do see some tailwinds coming just from some recovery of the West, which has a higher gross margin, which should benefit operating margins as well. The other thing we haven't talked much about is Farnell, which is our high service business, and that commands a really premium margin relative to our core business. We've got some trajectory of growth there that should help the overall portfolio's operating margins. Right. Can you talk about what your long-term operating margin targets are, and what are the levers for you to get there? Yeah, I think in general, with our model, the last couple of years have been sales declines, but it's one of scale. We need to get back our scale in terms of sales growth. We think the end markets we serve, on a medium-term basis, have high single-digit kind of growth rates at least mid-single digits, but a lot of them, like industrial and even aero-defense should have higher than that. We believe we're well positioned to take advantage of that growth. We really have done a good job controlling costs. We were very careful about not going after costs too much in this downturn to cut into the bone, you know, in terms of the sales force the front-end resources, because we want to be well positioned to capitalize on the recovery. I think it's a growth story with controlling costs pretty well, and we can drop through a lot of that to the bottom line. Farnell is going to help with that a lot. There's a lot of things in Farnell that we've done. We have corrected the cost model there. There's still a little bit of room to go there, but there's also some revenue synergies we can continue to get out of Farnell. A couple of things I'll point to would be, first, from an e-commerce, it's a high service kind of website-based business. Our conversion rate isn't where it probably should be. We get lots of traffic to not only the Farnell properties, but Avnet properties, but there's still some opportunity to meet industry standards in terms of conversion rate, which, as we improve the website proposition and some of the underlying content, we think we can get there, as well as synergies with the Avnet customer base. There's lots of large-sized customers that Avnet has strong relationships with that Farnell does very little business with. We refer to it as the power one, but really just trying to bring the Farnell high service proposition to some of our best customers and getting some of that share of wallet, which is pretty sizable for these big, large customers. Yeah, you brought up Farnell. Can you give us an update on just what you're doing specifically with the Farnell improvement strategy? Maybe just talk about the Farnell operating margins. How do they compare to your overall corporate margins? Yeah. Farnell is our high service business and, you know, think about it as speed and convenience, whereas the core Avnet may sell into the supply chain organizations of a company producing products with electronics. Farnell would typically maybe sell into the engineering group there that's doing the R&D, that's working with the next technology. It's smaller quantities, you know, overnight or two-day kind of delivery cycles. That speed and convenience demands a higher gross margin, right? More like 2 or 3x what the core business does. As the shortage market was occurring, what was happening is people were coming and getting parts from Farnell. It was upping their sales and they were able to command a little bit more premium on the margin. We lost out on some opportunities to look operationally and fix some of the operational things they had going and the tides were rising. Farnell, at its peak, was running north of 30% gross margins as well as north of 14% operating margin. We believe the business and their competition can achieve that again. The first thing we focused on is, with some changes in the management team, to really bring in a few more operational efficiencies in terms of the Opex. We took some Opex out and really tried to get the operations right-sized. I really focused on, you know, looking for opportunities to continue to grow the business. Farnell is a lot of businesses on the board components meaning what do you need to create an electronic board, but they're also into test and measurement as well as maintenance and repair type of products. Think about anything an engineer does on their workbench to design or develop a product. They sell all that proposition. Although we've seen steady recovery in some of the test and measurement and maintenance and repair, we have not seen the recovery yet in the on-the-board components. That will command a higher margin as well as the conversion rate we talked about on the e-commerce side of things and the opportunity to cross-sell with Avnet. Those are all tailwinds that we believe will come in our way. Operationally, we've fixed a lot of other things, but there's still some room to go there. What percentage of your revenues does Farnell represent? When we think about the growth going forward for Farnell, is there an opportunity for that to see outsized growth, or should we be thinking about what sort of growth? Yeah, I think yes is the answer. Farnell right now represents less than 10% of our business. At its peak, it was 7% or 8% of our business, but 20% of our operating profits. We believe with the Farnell growth is going to come an improvement to the mix. The margins at each product level category are pretty stable there, including for on-the-board components. We have a ways to go there. As they get the growth, they'll get the mix improvement as well, which will help gross margins and expand operating margins, but I do think with the other initiatives we have within our control, we'll have equal to or higher growth than the core business. Right. Can you talk about where your inventories are? Just given where we are in the cycle, are you contemplating increasing inventories at this point? I wouldn't say we're contemplating increasing inventories. I would still say we have pockets where it's a little excess than where we'd like it to be or relative to the current sales levels. The first priority is continuing to, you know, work down the inventory where they're elevated. We know those areas. I would say we've made really good progress, maybe not as quickly as we'd like, but good progress in terms of the composition of the inventory, whether it's aged inventory or pockets that weren't moving, been able to kind of turn that over and get to the product categories that we will be able to sell and will enable growth in the business. There is still some room to go there. We think we have enough inventory in terms of dollars to support, you know, any near to medium-term growth. We still need to make some progress in getting the right inventory on the shelves. That's continually our challenge, to make sure of the right product and only hold as much as we need to support what the customer's needs are. There is still some room to go there, but we did make some progress this year with a little bit more progress to go. Okay, how many days of inventory are you at? We're roughly 94 days of inventory. I think our goal exiting fiscal 2025 is to have lower than $5 billion of inventory when we started the year. When you normalize for currency, we were about $5 billion, $50 m illion. So, you know, about $50 million short, but did make some progress towards that. I would say we want our inventory days to be in the 80s as kind of the near-term goal here. It's still going to take a few more quarters to continue to work things out there. We definitely have line of sight and it's a priority for the team. Again, we want to emphasize that, as a distributor, inventory is kind of the lifeblood of our business. We need to have the right inventory to fit customer needs, especially when you talk about this turns business improving where there's near-term customer demand within lead times. If you have that product on the shelf, that yields a sale, and a lot of times that yields a higher margin for us. We want to make sure we're well positioned. As lead times extend out, if they do with demand increasing, be ready to kind of take our fair share. Right. Can you talk about what you're seeing from a pricing perspective right now? I would say pricing has generally been relatively stable, right? You know, we went through a period where we were having multiple price increases in a given year, but feel that ASPs are pretty steady now. With the demand environment where it's at, I think there's competitive pressures in terms of a customer wants a better deal and shops it. To keep your customer entanglement, you might have to do some things on price. In general, we're seeing puts and takes there, but nothing of note. We think margins overall are pretty stable regionally, but ASPs are holding up, which is good. We don't see anything that would indicate any near-term or even medium-term move to lower ASPs as a wholesale perspective. We've even heard rumblings of price increases in certain specific technologies. We feel really good about, you know, where pricing is at, t here was a lot of customer energy and outbursts over tariffs. Of course, no one wants to pay a tariff. I think we've worked through some of that, although we still want to minimize the impact of tariffs. We look at it year over year on each region. Gross margins held up pretty good. From fiscal 2025 to fiscal 2024 across all three regions, including Farnell, generally margins holding up pretty well. A little bit of puts and takes, but feel okay about that. Really focused on getting the regional mix improving and just getting back to growth across all regions. Yep. I think the last question for me is just when you think about just competition, can you just talk about from a differentiation perspective? How do you differentiate yourselves from some of the other big distributors out there, like Arrow and WPG? Yeah, and there's lots of competition out there, although you know, it's a big market. I guess our first differentiator I'd point to is Farnell. We're the only broadline global distributor with a high service business. We do think high service has a long-term future in the broader component supply chain. Farnell is well positioned in Europe, and we've made some investments to make that a better business. Next, I'd say our line card. There are nuances with our line card versus some of the competition. We really excel at the high-end technologies, and where we do have competing lines, we're usually number one in some of those lines. We feel pretty good about that. That's been a key focus area for the last several years to really be well positioned with the suppliers. What we need to deliver as a distributor is customer count growth and overall revenue growth. If we can deliver those, you know, we're in good graces with the supplier partners. I do think our leadership team is pretty tenured. We just did announce the transition in Europe, and we're excited about that. At the same time, we've had a pretty stable leadership environment at each of our business units, not only in Asia, but in Europe, but also with the CEO. Helm Phil's been with us for 43 years. We think that's important because, you know, we understand the value distribution provides. We're trying to just be the best value a distributor would be, not something that we're not, right? We understand our customer space, understand our supplier space, and want to compete well in the distribution space. I think in markets like Asia, you know, we're a little stronger in Taiwan, which we're comfortable with as a good market, right? Those are probably the key factors I'd point to. Again, we have really good competitors, and I do think there's room in this space for everyone to kind of rise, especially with the proliferation of electronics we'd expect over the next several years. Great. Thanks very much, Ken. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.