Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q2 2021 Armstrong World Industries Inc. earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question- and- answer session; instructions will follow at that time. If anyone should require assistance during the conference, please press star then zero on your touch-tone telephone. As a reminder, this conference call may be recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ms. Theresa Womble, Director of Investor Relations. Thank you, Ashley, and welcome everyone. On today's call, Vic Grizzle, our CEO, and Brian MacNeal, our CFO, will discuss Armstrong World Industries' Q2 2021 results, rest-of-year outlook, and strategic progress. Our discussion of operating and financial performance will include non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of SEC Regulation G. A reconciliation of these measures with the most directly comparable GAAP measure is included in the earnings press release and in the appendix of the presentation we issued this morning. Both are available on our investor relations website. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements that represent the view we have of our financial and operational performance as of today's date, July 27th, 2021. The statements involve risks and uncertainties that may differ materially from those expected or implied. We provide a detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties in our SEC filings, including the 10-Q, which was filed earlier this morning. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements beyond what is required by applicable securities law. I'll ask the operator to turn to slide seven of our presentation as I turn the call over to Vic. Thanks, Theresa. You all recognize a new voice on the phone this morning. That's Theresa Womble. It's really great to have her. She is backfilling Tom Waters, who retired last quarter. Welcome, Theresa. Thank you all for joining our call today. It's good to be with you to review our second quarter results. It's been a challenging 16 months since the onset of the pandemic, and I want to begin by thanking the 2,800 employees at AWI for their dedication, agility, and excellent execution during these trying times. It's because of their excellent work that AWI is so well-positioned to capture the current market recovery. The results we posted this morning mark a strong recovery from last year's second quarter, when the pandemic was accelerating, and many markets were effectively shut down by government mandates. On a year-over-year basis, second quarter consolidated net sales grew 38%, driven by a 32% increase in Mineral Fiber sales and a 59% increase in Architectural Specialties sales. We generated $100 million of adjusted EBITDA, which was a 44% increase from prior year results, and our adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 160 basis points. This is a particularly impressive margin performance given persistent inflationary pressures and the investments we are making in people, innovation, and technology in support of our strategic priorities and to serve the growth we see ahead for the rest of 2021 and beyond. On the strength of these results and the expected continuation of the market recovery in the back half of the year, we have updated and increased our 2021 guidance. Before Brian gets into the financial details, I'll provide some insights into market developments this quarter and the drivers behind the strong momentum we have heading into the back half of the year. Across both Mineral Fiber and Architectural Specialties segments, we are experiencing a solid rebound in renovation activity. As expected, and consistent with historical norms coming out of recessionary conditions, this activity is broad-based across the majority of our verticals and is providing the expected offset to the continued softness in new construction project starts from 2020. Overall, non-residential construction indicators continue to improve, and many of the delayed projects from 2020 have resumed. Of the various sector drivers we monitor, over half have continued to strengthen since April. Additionally, bidding activity in the quarter improved from first- quarter levels, again, with improvement in all verticals. Within those verticals, retail and office activity posted the strongest sequential improvements. All of these are positive indicators that the recovery is strengthening and are providing greater clarity to our outlook for the second half of 2021, and more confidence that we can enter 2022 at a sales run rate at or above 2019 levels. As a result, we have increased our full-year sales, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted EPS outlook. Turning to the specifics in the segments and looking first at the Mineral Fiber segment, our sales per shipping day rate continued to recover and shows sequential improvement for the fourth consecutive quarter. July's rates at this point are continuing the upward trend and are in line with what we would normally expect from a seasonality perspective. As with most companies, we have been working hard to manage the impact of inflation, our sales teams continue to do an outstanding job of ensuring that our announced price actions are realized in the marketplace to offset persistent inflationary pressure. Consistent with our history, our teams delivered like-for-like pricing ahead of inflation again this quarter. As we expect inflation to persist, we have announced our third price increase this year, effective mid-August. AUV in total was an outstanding highlight in the quarter, with significant mix improvements to go along with the strong like-for-like price realization. AUV improved 10% in the quarter. Aided by a strong rebound in territory mix, as we posted sequential and year-over-year improvements in each of our top seven territories. Operationally, our Mineral Fiber plants ran well, and operating lever age improved. The operational excellence of our manufacturing teams has been a bright spot throughout the pandemic and has never been more critical than now, given the broader material shortages in the construction industry. This is becoming a real competitive advantage for Armstrong. Even in these most challenging times for supply chains, we have maintained our best-in-class service levels. As a result, we hear from our customers that our ability to be a consistent and reliable supplier distinguishes Armstrong, not only in the ceiling space, but in the broader commercial construction market as well. I'm extremely proud of the work our operations teams are doing. Our WAVE joint venture also had an excellent quarter, again, managing to price ahead of significant steel inflation and delivered solid earnings growth. The team at WAVE has done an excellent job managing through extraordinary pressures on both steel pricing and availability. With their great work in this first half, they are well-positioned to maintain service levels and stay ahead of inflation in the second half of the year. In our Architectural Specialties segment, our strong top-line growth was driven by both our 2020 acquisitions and a nice bounce- back in our organic business due to recovering demand for major renovation work as more people return to commercial buildings. EBITDA margin in this business improved sequentially, but remained below prior- year levels, primarily due to our investments in commercial and production capabilities to meet the robust outlook we have for the remainder of 2021 and going into 2022. We are pleased with the progress thus far of integrating the 2020 acquisitions, and as sales accelerate through the back half of the year, we expect our margins to continue to improve. The backlog in Architectural Specialties continues to build on the record levels we referenced in our first quarter call. This is particularly encouraging and demonstrates continued penetration into this Fragmented Specialty segment. While this bodes well for future sales, we do expect to experience some short-term project delays, similar to what we also see with new construction and major renovation Mineral Fiber projects, due to material and labor shortages impacting upstream building activity. Despite a strong backlog, we could experience some choppiness here in the short term. Inflationary pressures are also impacting the Architectural Specialties segment. Similarly to our Mineral Fiber segment activity, we are on our third price increase to offset raw material inflation. All in all, this was a strong quarter for the company, and with the momentum we see in our key markets, we expect to deliver additional growth in the second half of the year. With that, I'll turn the call over to Brian to discuss more of the financial details. Brian? Thanks, Vic. Good morning to everyone on the call, and welcome, Theresa. Today, I'll be reviewing our second quarter 2021 results and our updated guidance for the full year. Before I begin, as a friendly reminder, I'll be referring to the slides available on our website, and slide three details our basis of presentation. On slide five, we begin with our consolidated second quarter 2021 results. Adjusted sales of $280 million were up 38% versus the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA grew 44%, and EBITDA margins expanded 160 basis points. Adjusted diluted earnings per share of $1.16 was 61% above prior year results. This result excludes $7 million, or $0.10 on an adjusted EPS basis, of acquisition-related amortization. This is an adjustment we are introducing this quarter because we believe it provides a more meaningful comparison of operating performance between periods. This adjustment has been made retrospectively and prospectively in the reconciliation tables included in our earnings material. Our balance sheet remains strong, in a strong position as we ended the quarter with $419 million of available liquidity, including a cash balance of $119 million and $300 million of availability on a revolving credit facility. Net debt at the end of the quarter was $559 million, and our net debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.6x, as calculated under the terms of our credit agreement, remains well below our covenant threshold of 3.75x. We have considerable headroom here and feel comfortable in our current positioning. In the quarter, we repurchased 194,000 shares for $20 million, or an average price of $102.85 per share. This marks a clear step up from our Q1 purchases of $10 million. We currently have $564 million remaining under our repurchase program, which expires in December 2023. On this slide, you'll also see our consolidated second- quarter EBITDA bridge from the prior year results. The $31 million EBITDA gain was primarily driven by increased volume as well as favorable AUV and increased WAVE equity earnings. As Vic mentioned, the positive AUV was driven by both like-for-like pricing actions and improved territory mix as we saw a resurgence in our T7 markets. This was partially offset by higher SG&A costs driven by continued growth investments in our Healthy Spaces and digitalization efforts, normalization of spending following last year's temporary cost outs, and our 2020 acquisitions. We discuss our Mineral Fiber segment results on slide six. In the quarter, sales increased 32%, mostly due to an expected increase in sales volume from last year's trough in Q2, as the economy was shut down. While this rebound was anticipated, we're happy to see both volume and AUV coming ahead of our expectations. We continue to closely monitor our daily ship rate compared to both 2020 and 2019, and we are happy with where we're trending in the couple of weeks, at the beginning of the third quarter. As a reminder, we expect the typical seasonality of our sales to return to something closer to normal this year, with our strongest months occurring in the summer. Both comparisons remain unusual due to an atypical 2020. Mineral Fiber segment adjusted EBITDA increased 44%, driven by the volume in AUV gains, which were partially offset by higher SG&A spending to support our growth investments and the reinstitution of certain costs that were temporarily reduced during 2020. Input cost was a headwind this quarter, which impacts across our supply chain. This is part of the reason we've added a price increase in May and have also announced an August price increase. We expect inflation to stabilize but remain elevated over the back half of the year. It was a very strong quarter for our WAVE joint venture, as they are doing an excellent job of pricing ahead of inflation and managing steel supply chain issues. Moving to the Architectural Specialties or AS segment on slide seven, we reported second quarter sales growth of 59% or $27 million, with the 2020 acquisitions of Turf, Móz, and Arktura contributing $17 million and our organic sales increasing $9 million or 20%. AS segment EBITDA increased $3 million, as improved sales from the 2020 acquisitions and the organic business more than offset increased manufacturing costs and SG&A spend. It's important to note that the planned spending increases in manufacturing and SG&A support our growth strategy for this segment and will help ensure that we maintain strong service levels for our customers as order intake levels remain at historic highs. The EBITDA margin for the segment improved sequentially by 255 basis points from the first quarter. As sales ramp up further through the year, we expect EBITDA margins to improve in line with that growth. Slide eight shows the drivers of our consolidated results for the six-month period, including a breakout of the impact from our 2020 acquisitions. Sales for the first six months of the year were up 18%, and adjusted EBITDA increased 12%. The year-to-date results share a similar story as the quarter: higher volumes, favorable AUV, and increased WAVE equity earnings, which were partially offset by higher SG&A spend. Adjusted diluted earnings per share increased 13% to $2.11. Again, this now excludes acquisition-related amortization in both the base and current period. Slide nine shows our year-to-date adjusted free cash flow performance versus the prior year. The decline of $13 million was driven by an increase in capital expenditures as we get back to our normal CapEx spending levels, following lower spending in 2020 as we managed for cash and liquidity. Our cash generation through the first six months was above our expectations and is the basis for increasing adjusted free cash flow guidance for the full year, as you'll see on the next slide. Slide 10 summarizes our updated guidance for 2021. Please note this guidance update assumes no significant pandemic-related shutdowns or job delays due to supply chain issues. We are closely monitoring variants of COVID-19 and their impact on our business. We are increasing our guidance ranges for all of our key metrics and now expect year-over-year revenue growth of 16%-18%, adjusted EBITDA growth of 12%-15%, adjusted EPS growth of 12%-18%. We are also lifting the bands of our free cash flow generation to $195 million-$210 million. The adjusted EPS figures for both 2020 and 2021 reflect our decision to exclude acquisition-related amortization in the calculation. On the right side of the page, you'll see highlighted changes in the key drivers of our guidance revision. The two largest changes you'll notice are the increase in Mineral Fiber AUV to 6%-9% and increasing of our Mineral Fiber volume to 2%-4%. I will get to those in a second; first, I'll touch on the others. We are dropping the ranges of our 2020 acquisition benefit to the AS segment by 5% to reflect actual performance to date and expectations for the second half of the year. You'll see an increased depreciation and amortization being driven by the finalization of the purchase accounting for our December acquisition of Arktura. As previously noted, we are excluding the acquisition- related intangible amortization from adjusted EPS, but wanted to provide an update for those that use amortization in their modeling. The increase in CapEx is in support of our capital allocation priorities, with the number one priority being reinvesting to drive growth in our business. Now on to Mineral Fiber AUV and volume. Earlier, Vic mentioned three pricing actions we've taken in Mineral Fiber this year, which were in February, May, and August, and have been 7%, 10%, and 11%, respectively. While we do not fully realize these announced price increases, the increased pace and rate of these increases are a large part of the reason we're elevating the AUV range to 6%-9% for the full year. We never take our ability to get a price for granted, and we realize it's vital to our success. We also expect the mix to lift AUV as we continue our legacy of product innovation, return to historical levels of AUV fall-through, and now have put the unusual channel and territory headwinds of 2020 behind us. Mineral Fiber volume growth has always been a priority for us. With our performance through the first half of the year, the favorable macroeconomic trends, and with the traction we're seeing in Healthy Spaces and our digital initiatives, we anticipate Mineral Fiber volume growth of 2%-4% for the full year. In conclusion, our performance in Q2 was a key input to our increased confidence in raising our full- year 2021 guidance. We're delighted with the work our teams have done and the results that we've achieved. I'm excited and optimistic about the months and years to come for Armstrong. I know our teams feel the same way. With that, let's advance to slide 11. I'll turn it back to Vic. Thanks, Brian. As Brian was alluding to, we're very pleased with how our business has performed so far in 2021, and with the continued recovery of the broader market, we have reason to be more optimistic and positive about the outlook for the rest of the year. Before we get into our Q&A session, I'd like to share some thoughts on the progress we've made on the key pillars of our strategy. The work we've been able to accomplish despite the challenges of the pandemic has put us in a strong position to capture the opportunities emerging as the economy recovers. The cornerstone of our strategy has been revitalizing the demand for Mineral Fiber products while improving the AUV generated by these products. To this end, we are certainly glad to see people starting to return to offices, schools, and restaurants, although we continue to monitor the evolving dynamics of this pandemic. The Kastle Back to Work Index at the end of the second quarter hit its highest mark since March of last year, when the pandemic really took hold in the U.S. We're seeing employers, owners, architects, and designers, and occupants rethinking and redesigning their spaces to meet new emerging demands for what now defines a healthy and safe place. The trends of densification are reversing, and the focus on air quality has been redefined and changed forever. These new forces on interior spaces are creating additional renovation and new construction opportunities for Armstrong because ceilings play a critical role in achieving this newly defined level for healthy spaces, and our innovative Healthy Spaces products are gaining traction. We just recently received the largest order yet for our 24/7 Defend family of products from a large school district in Florida. The VIDASHIELD products ordered are specifically designed to support improved indoor air quality with technology that's endorsed by the CDC to remove airborne pathogens in a format integrated directly into the ceiling tile. Our Living Lab, which we recently opened at our headquarters campus, showcases partnerships and is a vehicle to drive new innovation for Healthy Spaces. This lab allows for design and product experimentation, as well as the collection of important data to demonstrate the benefits of various designs, products, and solutions for total indoor environmental quality. The lab demonstrates how to bring a holistic approach to indoor environmental quality by focusing on optimal lighting, thermal, and acoustical conditions, as well as air quality. Ceilings is what bring these together and is the hallmark of how Healthy Spaces are defined. A building that supports the physical, psychological, and social health and well-being of people. We also continue to make progress with our digital efforts with another quarter of sequential growth from the Kanopi and PROJECTWORKS platforms. The speed and cost advantages these digital platforms offer customers are not only industry-leading, but they represent a step change in design outcomes for both architects and contractors. The progress we've made with these digital platforms is important to support our long-term growth in Mineral Fiber. Growing through Architectural Specialties and creating more scale in that business is also a key strategic priority for us. We have made solid progress in integrating our 2020 acquisitions, while organically, we continue to increase our level of penetration. Through a broader array of specialty products and capabilities, we are extending our reach into more spaces in commercial buildings. Even with the recent delays in major new construction projects, we continue to expect double-digit top-line growth and margin expansion in this business. Finally, maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation rounds out our priorities. While we acted prudently at the start of the pandemic to preserve cash, we maintained our number one priority of investing back into our business when strategically important innovation and acquisition opportunities emerged. We have made these investments while still providing direct returns to shareholders through our dividend and share buyback programs. With confidence in our strong cash flow going forward, we have both the capability and the intent to maintain a balance of all these capital allocation priorities. Our team is focused and committed to these strategic priorities and to the overall purpose of the company, making a positive difference in the spaces where we live, work, learn, heal, and play. The dedication of our employees, coupled with our best-in-class distribution network and our partner relationships, remains a unique form of competitive advantage, helping us deliver the best products for our customers and strong returns for our shareholders. While we continue to monitor evolving pandemic conditions, Armstrong is well- positioned for a strong future ahead. With that, we'll be happy to take your questions now. At this time, if you have a question, please press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research. Hi. Thank you for taking my questions today. Inflation has been the topic of the year. Appreciate the color on the pricing actions you have so far. In thinking about really realizing the full effects of these, is this realistically to start hitting late in 2021 and more into 2022? Also, along with that line, with the price increases, given you're starting to see more renovation, which is generally a higher price point, are you seeing changes in mix, and also the price increases from a mix standpoint? Thank you. Hi, Kathryn. Thank you for the question. Yeah, I think pricing has been something in our Mineral Fiber business, and particularly in our grid business through WAVE. We have a track record of staying ahead of that, being able to anticipate and then stay ahead of that. I think our first half performance on our price initiatives and the realization of those initiatives have demonstrated we continue to stay ahead of the inflation. Our price increase in August, I think, should reassure everyone that we'll stay ahead of the inflation that's anticipated to continue into the second half of the year. When we talk about these price increases, again, based on history, the price increases are across the entire product portfolio. At the low end, at the mid, and at the high end of the product portfolio, we get similar price realization. No matter what the mix of products happens to be in a more renovation-rich environment, which we're entering now, we should have similar price realization expectations in all of those environments because we get it across the entire portfolio. That's something we're counting on, and I don't expect any price mix impacts from our price realization efforts that way. I will mention that on the overall mix, last year, we talked about product mix being a good guy, but it was overshadowed by the territory mix. What we saw in the second quarter, and we expect to continue to see in the second half, is the territory mix, which was the bad actor and the overshadow last year from the unnatural dynamics of shutting down these key markets. Those continue to heal, and we got a nice benefit from that in the second quarter, and I think those are going to continue to heal by the activity we see in the second half. Okay. That's helpful. There's a wide variety of different bottlenecks in the value chain, but also shortages of certain supplies and materials, including aluminum and others. Are there any types of raw material shortages that you're seeing and are having to work around? Across our business, we haven't seen or felt that impact. We're monitoring the steel for our grid business very closely, and we're managing that very well. We don't believe that's a risk into the business, but we're watching it very carefully. Again, across our business, we have not seen supply chain issues impact service levels. Again, very proud of the fact that we're able to maintain our lead times and deliver on time and not be part of the issue that I think a lot of our customers are experiencing at the moment. Okay. Final question. What is the biggest difference sequentially when you think about how you've been managing the business and taking a step back, what does that give you confidence looking forward over the next 12- 18 months? Thank you. Thanks, Kathryn. I think we expected renovation activity to bounce back this year. We had been talking about when new construction activity historically goes down or into negative territory, renovation activity picks up and moves into positive territory. That's been true in eight of the last nine recessions. Again, you have to go back decades to get to the nine last recessions. That has been historically the norm, and we expected that to happen again this year, and that's exactly what we're experiencing. When I look at the renovation activity coming back in 2021, number one, as expected, but when I see the strength of it in the bidding activity, which I'm watching very closely as a leading indicator to future demand. The bidding activity in the second quarter was a step change from what was seen in the first quarter, number one. When I go back and look at Q2 2020, and I look at how much the bidding activity fell off and compare it to how much it picked up in the second quarter. It was a step change different to not only rebound from where it was, but it's even stronger than what it was negative, if that makes sense to you. That was across the spectrum of types of construction. In particular, in the renovation part of the market, it was up demonstrably better. I think that's a leading indicator for us for confidence into the second half and certainly into 2022. I'll point to one other thing. Our backlog in the Architectural Specialties business, which Kathryn, you know well, we have our best visibility there in terms of projects. Our backlog in our Architectural Specialties business has built on the record level we had in the first quarter. Sitting here for the second half, we have the most backlog in position than we've ever had for our second half expectation. Again, that's providing some additional, I think, optimism for the recovery is well underway. Okay, great. Thanks. Thank you. Your next question comes from Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Hi, Susan. My first question is, thinking about the mix across the different verticals, I know that you talked about the sequential increase that you've seen in office and retail in the second quarter, but when we think about the comps in there and all the moving parts that have come together over the last year, can you talk about which verticals are seeing the most growth, which ones you still have some more incremental room to improve over time and, just where things are falling and your expectations for that as we go through the second half and then into 2022? Yeah. Susan, across all the verticals, I think let me just step back. The reference you made to retail and office was in the bidding activity. It really was a standout improvement in bidding activity in those two areas. Of course, that's a leading indicator, right? That's not necessarily what we saw in the second quarter. That being said, referencing your point, what we saw in the second quarter was actually a bounce back across all the verticals, still kind of uniformly. I reported on this in the first quarter, too, which makes sense when you think about everything was uniformly shut down last year. It wasn't necessarily a segment- by- segment shutdown. It was across the entire industry. I think naturally, we're seeing some uniformity in the bounce back as projects that were delayed have resumed, and we're starting to see those in the pipeline. I'll go back to something we watched very closely last year, was the project delays, and we were watching for cancellations, and we reported on this. We saw very few cancellations of projects last year. It stands to reason that those projects that didn't get canceled should be resumed, and then that's really what we're experiencing on a uniform basis in the first half of this year, I would say. Going forward, I think it's interesting. It's nice to see the office kind of outperforming, if you will, in the bid activity, along with retail. Okay. All right. That's a very helpful color. I guess, just as a follow-up to that, I know you made some comments around some of the new product introductions, Healthy Spaces, those kinds of things that you've put out there, and it sounds like they are getting some momentum. Can you just talk to how those are contributing to some of this volume growth that you're seeing coming through? Any kind of indicators in terms of either actual orders or the bidding activity that's coming in, and how we should be thinking about their contribution to the business going forward? Yeah, it's on the fringes, really. It's a marginal contribution relative to the overall size of the business. I'm very pleased with the month-over-month growth that we're seeing there. They're not meaningful contributors in the first half of this year. I would expect for 2021, it's probably not a meaningful level. The big driver here is the uptick in renovation activity, and that is the single biggest driver and will be for the rest of the year. Okay. All right. That makes sense. Can I just squeeze in one last one, which is, this quarter you've not mentioned anything on channel mix, which in the past has been a pressure in the business. Is it fair to say that that's really alleviated itself and things have really started to normalize from a channel perspective in the second quarter? I think that's right. That's the right conclusion. Yeah. It was really not a meaningful contribution, plus or minus. Yeah. Okay. All right. Thank you, guys. Good luck. Yeah, thank you. Your next question comes from Phil Ng with Jefferies. Hey, guys. Your volume guidance for Mineral Fiber seems pretty conservative, given the momentum you're seeing in the business well into July. You got some easy comps. What is driving your expectations for essentially flattish volumes in the back half if we look at the midpoint of your guidance? Are there any things that we need to be mindful of? The uptick you're seeing in R&R being offset by new construction? Any color would be helpful, Vic. Okay. Yeah, Phil, I think there is still some chop that we are seeing. We had talked about in April, we had levels above 2019 levels. Okay. May and June kind of normalized. July is at or above 2019 levels. We're seeing a little bit of unevenness across the market, and I think we're factoring some of that chop into our outlook for the second half. I wouldn't undervalue the acceleration we are putting in for the second half of the year. We do expect some acceleration in Mineral Fiber in the second half. We do have some expectation for some early chop, I think, until we get to the later parts of the end of the year. Again, as I stated in my remarks, we expect to be at 2019 or above exiting the year. Okay. Is the chop units more on the new construction business, which has a lag factor from last year, right? It sounds like R&R has been pretty solid. It's really across geographies, frankly, as well as it is across the construction types. I wouldn't just put it in the bucket of new. Obviously, new is a headwind, right? We didn't have the starts last year to be selling into this year, but the renovation activity is more than offsetting that as we outlooked. Okay. Thinking out to 2022, Vic, you mentioned a step change in bidding activity in 2Q. Is that more on the Mineral Fiber side of things? When we think about that kind of coming to fruition on your volumes, when should we kind of expect that flowing through? Well, we look at the bidding activity across the construction types. We look at it on a value basis as well as a number basis. It's really for the entire business. It's not just- Okay mineral fiber. Certainly pertains to mineral fiber as well. Again, the lag on these starts ranges from 6 -24 months, depending on the size of the projects. Okay. Within that, 18 months is a pretty good average. Okay. Bidding activity could have some impact on the second half, but certainly in 2022. Okay, super helpful. Just one quick one. AUV accelerated pretty nicely in the quarter, and you're implying a nice pickup in the back half. Any color in terms of how to break up mix as a good guide versus absolute pricing, and does your guidance factor in what you guys have out there for the August price increase? It's a pretty impressive price and pricing right now. We're running around that historical split of 50/50. In inflationary times, we tend to get a little bit more price than mix. We might end up a little bit more than 50/50 toward the end of the year with our August price increase. We're running pretty close year to date here at a 50/50 mark, so that's not a bad proxy to continue to use. Okay. Your guidance includes the August increase, or could that be an area of upside? Yeah, no, we've factored that into our guidance. It's considered in there, yes. Okay. Super helpful, guys. You bet. Your next question comes from Adam Baumgarten with Zelman. Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. Just on AUV, kind of if I look at the midpoint of guidance for the year, it actually would imply a very modest but slight deceleration on a year-over-year basis, despite easier comps in AUV and some of those price increases you mentioned starting to flow through. Is that maybe offset by some kind of mix, as mix did start to normalize a bit in the back half of next year? Just curious why it wouldn't kind of accelerate further, given all the initiatives and price increases out there. Yeah, we had probably our best mix contribution in the second quarter, right, with the territories correcting themselves, and we didn't have the channel mix headwind. I think that's a good way to think about it, is mix is going to normalize a bit in the back half, as we had some improvement in those seven key territories that was the overhang on mix in the second half of last year. I think that's the right way to think about it, as we expect to get more price realization in the back half to offset inflation, stay ahead of inflation, frankly. Got it. Thanks. I'd be curious if you could give us some more color on some of the acquisitions and the performance being below your expectations. Is that end market related? Are there supply constraints? Just some more color around, kind of the slightly worse than you anticipated performance there. Yeah. Let me just start with saying that we're very pleased with the performance of those acquisitions. They're growing double digits in the face of the pandemic. They had a very strong year last year, and they're growing double digits on top of that this year. I want to say that because contextually, that's how we think about these acquisitions and how they're performing. Remember, the earn-out structure that we put in place was for some stretch numbers that had risk to them, given the pandemic and the recovery rate and pace of the recovery. Nobody could guess that. We put an earn-out structure, which really pushed the risk toward the sellers of the company. As Brian could comment on the accounting, we had to account for that, and they're not reaching those levels, those stretch levels. They're performing very well, and again, at double-digit levels in the face of this pandemic. Got it. Then, just lastly, just curious what you're seeing in education and government markets. We're kind of hearing that things are picking up, given some of the surpluses that state and local governments have, I would assume, and some of that's going towards schools. I'm not sure if you called that out yet on the call, but just what you're seeing in education and maybe some of the government verticals. Yeah. The activity is there. The bidding activity is there. I would say we've not seen an abnormal contribution from education or institutional spending, or institutional segments, so far. I think that's still coming. I think they're still working through what changes they're going to make, what design modifications they're going to make in the schools, and so forth. We're seeing good activity there, but I wouldn't say we've seen kind of a step up in activity there based on government stimulus that's going their way. Got it. Thanks a lot. Good luck. Thank you. Your next question comes from Stephen Kim with Evercore ISI. Yeah. Thanks very much, guys. Appreciate all the color. Vic, I had a general question about what you think the potential impact of the Delta variant or some other variant that we may see here over the next six months or a year might be like. In general, I would think that there could be some obvious negatives in the form of maybe some potential additional delays or something in project work. On the other hand, I could also see some positives. As you sort of reflect back on how the initial wave of COVID sort of has ultimately kind of played out now that the dust is settling on that, I'm curious what you think your exposure from a variant coming into the picture would be, whether it would be net positive or net negative. Yeah, Stephen, it's an interesting question because if you go back and you're referencing what happened last year. Remember what happened last year? The markets were shut down, basically. Construction sites were shut down, and activity literally came to a halt. That's not a scenario that we would be planning for or expecting to happen from the variant. I don't sense any appetite out there to go that far. With that said, we're watching it very closely because, depending on certain local regulations that could go in place, we could see that impact rate and pace of job sites being completed or resumed. We're keeping a close eye on that. The positive side of this, which you had said, it just keeps in front of everybody that we have to continue to work to make these spaces healthy enough so that we can exist, and we can function, and go on about our economic lives with the variant and other variants that may come down the pipe. In a way, it reinforces the need for healthy spaces and how we have to think about these spaces to be able to get people back into them, but also keep them in the event that there's not only this variant, but there's newer variants. We're balanced about it, but we're watching it very closely in terms of its impact on the rate and pace of construction activity in the back half of the year. Yeah, fair point. I wanted to ask about some of the investments that kind of run through in the walk on the SG&A side, on the SG&A line. Was curious if you could give us some general sense of what the split was between just temporary cost reversals and the actual investments? Secondarily, are you seeing the improvement that you talked about geographically across your business? Was that inclusive of New York City specifically? Yes. Let me take the second part of the question, and I'll let Brian answer the SG&A split. Yeah, all seven of the territories, all seven of them improved, including New York City. In fact, New York and California both improved nicely in the quarter. Those are two very big markets for us, so it was good to see. Brian, you want to handle the SG&A question? Stephen, good question. As you look at page five, our EBITDA bridge, we've got $18 million higher SG&A. $5 million of that's coming from the 2020 acquisitions, $6 million from those temporary cuts we did last year in 2020 coming back in, and you and others may recall, we said it's about $5 million a quarter. It rounded to $6 million in this quarter. Another $7 million at the total company level in investments around the growth, digital, and Healthy Spaces. Okay. Is that level of investment, roughly $7 million, is that a number that we could kind of be thinking about for the next couple of quarters? Yeah. It'll stay no higher than that $7 million, but around that number. Okay. Great. Thank you so much, guys. Great. Thanks, Stephen. Your next question comes from Kenneth Zener with KeyBank. Good morning, everybody. Hey, Ken. Hey, Ken. Brian, you talked about normal seasonality, I think, in your prepared remarks. Normal seasonality implies a little up 3Q from 2Q. Which, given your overall guidance, would imply 4Q rolling off at the normal level. Is that within the range of what you were trying to communicate, just so I'm clear? Yeah, Kenneth. Dead on. Q3 typically is our strongest quarter. We would expect to see that pick up some in Q4 B, proportionately lower, back to its normal percentage of the year. Okay. Vic, I think you made comments around exiting FY 2021 above FY 2019. Could you be specific? It could be sales, it could be EBIT, it could be margin. Could you just kind of talk to what you're referring to there, please? Yeah. Sure, Ken. That's a daily shipping sales rate. Okay. We're tracking that as a proxy to when does the market gets back to full recovery, and we're back to building on that platform for future growth. That's kind of the proxy we've been looking. That's really a Mineral Fiber because that represents probably the broader part of the market versus the overall. Our overall sales per shipping day rate is already above 2019 because of the growth in AS and because of the acquisitions. Right. We're really trying to use it as a proxy to the overall health and condition of the broader market. Okay. Got it. With the 4Q seasonality. Okay, that makes sense. You talked about the backlog. Are these the price increases since you looked at the 10-Ks back to, it sounds like the early 1960s, on here, recession stuff. Are these prices actually exceeding what you saw in the 1970s by chance? Prices of our products or the project? I'm sorry. Yeah, just the sequential price increases. It's three big increases here. Is this nearly? I haven't gone through all the 10-Ks, but it certainly seems like this might be a record actual price increase for you guys in Mineral Fiber. Is that accurate? It's pretty close. We had a cumulative similar number, maybe not as high in 2018, when we had, again, some rapid inflation based on the steel tariffs in particular. Right. yeah. It's up there, Ken, to your point. Yeah. Again, a reflection of the inflation we're seeing. Yeah. No, I get it. I ask, I wonder, backlog, demand, AWI versus others. Are you seeing share shifts at all? I know it's not something you want to be specific around, so I'm sensitive to that. However, I'm just wondering how that fits in, given capacity constraints in the industry. I'm just trying to understand if you're seeing demand or if you're seeing share shifts or something to that effect. Thank you very much. Yeah, Ken. I think this is really a renovation activity, driving what we're seeing right now versus significant moves in share gain. We're doing a really good job at servicing our customers, holding onto specifications and winning new specifications, and that always helps with your pricing and your margins because you don't have inefficiencies in your plants and your supply chain. We're doing well. We're well-positioned. I'd say this is really a reflection of our innovation and some tailwind from a market recovery. Thank you. You bet. Thanks, Ken. Your next question comes from Garik Shmois with Loop Capital. Great. Thank you. Just wondering if you could provide a little bit more color, just on the increase in bidding that you're seeing in retail and office that you cited a couple of times on the call. Is this mostly on the renovation side? Just any more color on what's driving that? Is it a function of people returning back to work, office space, retail space, just getting used in different ways than it was pre-pandemic, or is it maybe more of just kind of a return of normal activity that one would've expected if we didn't have COVID? Yeah, it's pretty broad-based. All the verticals were positive. That was encouraging to see. Again, it's not too surprising because everything was kind of shut down and delayed from last year. There's some catch-up in there, I would imagine, from what didn't happen in 2020. Then retail and office was stronger than the others. Again, I think when I split it by new construction activity and the bidding there versus the bidding in alterations and renovation, it was meaningfully higher on the alteration and renovation activity, again, which reflects what we would expect to see when new construction is down, you would have higher rates of growth in alterations and renovation. Again, I think there's a combination of a little bit of pent-up demand from stuff that didn't get done last year, plus the recovery and people returning back to the office, kids back in a classroom. Again, generally, people have to do something to get their spaces ready, no matter if you're, again, a restaurant owner, a gymnasium owner, a dentist's office. People are doing things to create a healthier environment for people to come back and feel good about being in those spaces. Again, I think all of this is kind of contributing to across the board, across the verticals, really across all of the construction types, higher activity. Again, with the higher activity being on alterations and renovations, which is what you would expect in this environment. Okay. Just as a follow-up to that, you referenced the strong alteration, renovation bidding. Given the context of inflation, at some point, and given the price increases that you're pushing and the inflation across other building product categories, at some point, do you get worried that the strong bidding environment could be hindered by the inflationary experiences that we're seeing right now? Watching for that. I have not seen that or hints of that. I think this is really much more supply chain and product availability driving the rate and pace versus the cost or the inflation. We should continue to watch for that, but I really don't get a sense that that's going to be the driver. I think supply and availability is going to be the driver on the rate and pace. Great. Thank you very much. Yeah, you bet. At this time, there are no further questions. I will now hand the call back to Vic Grizzle, CEO, for closing remarks. I just want to thank everybody again for joining our call today. We're pleased with where we are at the halfway mark here of the year, and really a transition year out of a pandemic, and as the market opens back up. Opens back up with a little bit of unevenness and some chop, as we talked about on the call. I love where we're positioned. We're investing into a bit of a tailwind here for market recovery, and we're excited about getting this market fully open and taking advantage of our strong position coming out of the pandemic. Again, thank you all for your attendance today and your interest, and we'll look forward to talking to you next quarter. That concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.