Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the American States Water Company conference call discussing the company's first quarter 2022 results. This call is being recorded, and if you would like to listen to the replay of this call, it will begin this afternoon at 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time and run through until Tuesday, May 10th, 2022 on the company's website at www.aswater.com. The slides that the company will be referring to are also available on this website. After today's presentation, there will be time for a question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one. To remove a question, you may press star, then two. Should you need any assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. This call will be limited to an hour. Presenting today from American States Water Company is Bob Sprowls, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Eva Tang, Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, certain matters discussed during this conference call may be forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Please review a description of the company's risks and uncertainties in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, this conference call will include a discussion of certain measures that are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the United States and constitute non-GAAP financial measures under the SEC rules. These non-GAAP financial measures are derived from consolidated financial information but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For more details, please refer to the press release. At this time, I will turn the call over to Bob Sprowls, President and Chief Executive Officer of American States Water Company. Thank you, Joel, and welcome everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'll begin with some brief comments on the quarter. Eva will then discuss some financial details, and then I'll wrap it up with some further thoughts on the quarter, updates on regulatory filings, California's drought condition, ASUS, dividends, and then we'll take your questions. This was a unique quarter with earnings per share coming in lower than the first quarter last year due to timing issues with receiving a final decision from the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, on our water general rate case at Golden State Water. Eva will discuss these results in detail. We continue to deliver high-quality water, wastewater, and electric services to customers during the quarter. We are making good progress on our goal to spend $140 million-$160 million this year in infrastructure investments at our regulated utilities that we discussed during the year-end call, strengthening the pipes, wells, hydrants, tanks, power lines, and more that our customers need for the long term. Along with awaiting a decision from the CPUC and Golden State Water's general rate case, we are also actively involved in processing our cost of capital application. In fact, hearings begin today in that application. We also strengthened the leadership at ASUS with the addition of Chris Connor, who joined the company as Senior Vice President and was previously at Jacobs Engineering. Chris brings a strong leadership background and, among other things, proven business development and sales track records working with the Department of Defense. I will now turn the call over to Eva. Thank you, Bob. Hello, everyone. Let me start with our first quarter financial results. Consolidated earnings were $0.38 per share as compared to $0.52 per share last year. Due to the delay in receiving a final decision in the pending water GRC, as mentioned by Bob, revenue, water revenue billed and recorded for the first quarter of 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates. Had the new rates been approved and implemented on January 1 this year, consistent with the November 2021 settlement agreement reached between Golden State Water and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC, Golden State Water would have recorded additional revenue of approximately $6.3 million or $0.12 per share and additional water supply costs of $1.6 million or $0.03 per share for the first quarter of 2022. Including these additional revenues and water supply costs, consolidated adjusted earnings for the first quarter ended March 31, 2022 were $0.47 per share. For our water utility subsidiaries, Golden State Water Company earnings were $0.23 per share as compared to $0.33 per share last year. Included in the results for the first quarter of 2022 were losses of $1.7 million, or $0.03 per share, on investments held to fund one of the company's retirement plans, as compared to gains of $628,000, or $0.01 per share, for the same period in 2021. Excluding the gains and losses on investments from both periods, adjusted diluted earnings at the water segment for the quarter were $0.26 per share as compared to adjusted earnings of $0.32 per share for the same period in 2021. That is an adjusted decrease of $0.06 per share. Also included in the result for the first quarter of this year was a $1.4 million reduction in revenues, or $0.03 per share, to reflect the estimated impact of a lower cost of debt included in Golden State Water's pending cost of capital application. There were also increases in operating expenses and in the effective income tax rate, partially offset by lower interest expense. Our electric segment earnings for the three-month period ending March 31, 2022 and 2021 were $0.07 per share. An increase in electric revenue was offset by higher operating expenses. Earnings from our contracted services segment decreased $0.04 per share for the quarter, largely due to a decrease in construction activity as a result of timing differences, partially offset by an increase in management fees and lower overall operating expenses. Consolidated revenue for the first quarter of 2022 decreased by $8.5 million as compared to the same period in 2021. The decrease was mostly due to lower construction activity at our contracted services segment due to timing, as discussed, and the cost of debt adjustment expected from the cost of capital proceeding at the water segment. The increase in electric revenues was largely due to CPUC-approved rate increases effective January 1st, 2022, as well as an increase in customer usage as compared to the first quarter of 2021. Turning to slide nine. Our water and electric supply costs were $23.3 million for the quarter, an increase of $700,000 from the same period last year. Any changes in supply costs for both the water and electric segments as compared to the adopted supply costs are tracked in balancing accounts. Looking at total operating expenses other than supply costs, consolidated expenses decreased $3.2 million as compared to the first quarter of 2021. This was primarily due to a decrease in construction costs at our contracted services segment, resulting from lower construction activity, partially offset by an increase in administrative and general expenses, depreciation, and other operating and maintenance costs. Interest expense, net of interest income, but excluding the losses and gains on the investment, decreased by $566,000 due to the early redemption of Golden State Water's 9.56%, $28 million private placement note in May of 2021, partially offset by an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support our capital program. Slide 10 shows the EPS bridge comparing the first quarter of 2022 with last year's first quarter. Turning to liquidity on slide 11. Net cash provided by operating activities was $38 million as compared to $24.7 million in 2021. During the first quarter of 2022, our regulated utilities received a total of $9.8 million in COVID relief funds from the state of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water and electric customer bills incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in operating cash flow was also due to differences in the timing of vendor payments, as well as differences in the timing of billing and cash receipts for construction work at military bases. Our regulated utility invested $35.5 million on company-funded capital projects during the quarter, and we estimate our full year 2022 capital expenditure to be $140 million-$160 million, barring any unexpected delays resulting from supply chain issues or the effects of the pandemic. In April 2022, American States Water's credit facility was amended to increase the borrowing capacity from $200 million to $280 million through the expiration of the credit facility in May of next year. This overall increase in total borrowing capacity will support, among other things, the capital program at Golden State Water. With that, I'll turn the call back to Bob. Thank you, Eva. Before I get into regulatory matters, I'd just like to reiterate a few factors impacting our first quarter's earnings. Had 2022 water rates been approved consistent with the settlement agreement and implemented on January 1st, 2022, Golden State Water's earnings contribution for the quarter would have been $0.09 per share higher. Once a final decision is issued by the CPUC in the general rate case, the new rates will be retroactive to January 1st, 2022. Therefore, we will record the retroactive impact at the time a decision is issued. We view this as a timing difference for the year. We also adjusted the water revenues to reflect the lower cost of debt in Golden State Water's pending cost of capital application, which decreased the quarterly earnings by $0.03 per share. The investment loss of $0.03 per share on one of our retirement plans during the first quarter of this year negatively impacted earnings by $0.04 as compared to last year's first quarter. We also expect ASUS to catch up on its construction activity during the remaining three quarters, and we reaffirm our projection that ASUS will contribute $0.45-$0.49 per share for 2022. I will now discuss our water general rate case filed in July 2020 to set new rates for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024. As I mentioned in our last earnings call, we reached a settlement agreement with the Public Advocates Office in November of last year on this general rate case. Only three issues were not settled. Let me briefly recap some of the key points in the settlement. The settlement, among other things, authorized Golden State Water to invest approximately $404.8 million in capital infrastructure for the three-year rate cycle. The amounts included in the settlement agreement, if approved, would increase the 2022 adopted revenues by approximately $330.3 million as compared to the 2021 adopted revenues, and increase the 2022 adopted supply costs by $9.7 million as compared to the 2021 adopted supply costs. The three issues not included in the settlement agreement were contested through the briefing process rather than hearings, and include Golden State Water Company's requests for a medical cost balancing account, a general liability insurance cost balancing account, and consolidation of two of the company's smaller customer service areas for rate-making purposes. We are disappointed that we have not seen a proposed decision. As we mentioned, the delay negatively impacted our earnings by a net of $0.09 per share for the quarter. Since the new water rates will be effective January 1st, 2022, we will record the retroactive revenues and expenses during the quarter in which the final decision is issued by the CPUC. A proposed decision is expected in mid-2022. Furthermore, Golden State Water completed $9.4 million of capital projects from the prior rate case recently approved by the CPUC for revenue recovery through advice letters, also included in the pending general rate case. The additional annual revenue requirements generated from these advice letter capital investments are $1.2 million and became effective February 15th of this year. Next, I will discuss the cost of capital case. Golden State Water filed a cost of capital application with the CPUC in May of 2021, requesting a capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, a return on equity of 10.5%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.1%, and a return on rate base of 8.18%. The hearings are set to start today. The cost of capital will be effective for the years 2022 through 2024. Once approved by the CPUC, the revenues will be reset based on the new cost of capital, which will be retroactive to January 1st of this year. A proposed decision is expected in the second half of 2022. In the first quarter, we recorded a reduction to revenues of $1.4 million or $0.03 per share to reflect the estimated revenue impact of a lower cost of debt of 5.1%, as requested in our cost of capital application, as compared to 6.6% included in 2021 rates currently billed to water customers. Bear Valley Electric is scheduled to file its general rate case in June to set new rates for the years 2023 through 2026. I will now discuss the drought situation in California. As of April 26th, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that 41% of California was considered an extreme drought. California is experiencing a record drought in calendar 2022, with precipitation from January to March as the driest on record for this three-month period. Due to deteriorating conditions, the California Department of Water Resources reduced the allocation of State Water Project water from 15% to 5% on March 18th. On April 26th, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, or MWD, declared a water supply emergency condition for the State Water Project dependent areas. This will impact Golden State Water's Simi Valley and Claremont service areas, which utilize a portion of their supply from the State Water Project. This action also includes a phased emergency conservation program that limits outdoor watering in those areas to one day per week. Should necessary demand reductions not be realized, MWD will move to zero outdoor watering days later in the summer. In addition, on March 28th, the Governor of California issued an executive order calling on all urban water suppliers to reduce water use by 20%-30% compared to water use in 2020. Golden State Water will be working with its local suppliers to assess water supply conditions and water use restrictions in its service areas and intends to make appropriate adjustments as needed. In 2021, the CPUC authorized Golden State Water to track incremental drought-related costs in a memorandum account for future recovery. Turning our attention to slide 16, we present the growth in Golden State Water's average rate base as authorized by the CPUC for 2018 through 2021. The weighted average rate base has grown from $752.2 million in 2018 to $980.4 million in 2021. Based on the general rate case settlement agreement, the 2022 rate base amount is $1,152.3 million, which, if approved, would result in a compound annual growth rate in rate base of 11.3% since 2018. The rate base amounts shown for 2021 and 2022 do not include any rate recovery for advice letter projects. Let's move on to ASUS, which had earnings of $0.08 per share for the first quarter of 2022, as compared to $0.12 per share for the same period in 2021. The decrease was largely due to timing differences in construction activity between the two periods, partially offset by increased management fees and lower overall operating expenses. Again, we reaffirm our projection that ASUS will contribute $0.45-$0.49 per share for 2022. The completion of filings for economic price adjustments, requests for equitable adjustment, asset transfers, and contract modifications awarded for new projects provide ASUS with additional revenues and dollar margin. We remain confident that we can effectively compete for new military base contract awards in the future based on our proven track record of managing water and wastewater-related services for military bases since 2004. We're actively involved in various stages of the proposal process at a number of other bases considering privatization, and the U.S. government is expected to release additional bases for bidding over the next several years. I would like to turn our attention to dividends. Last week, our board of directors approved a second quarter dividend of $0.365 per common share. In 2021, our board increased the annual dividend from $1.34 per share to $1.46 per share, an increase of 9%. Over the last 10 years, our dividend's compound annual growth rate is nearly 10%, consistent with our policy to achieve a compound annual growth rate in the dividend of more than 7% over the long term. Each quarter, I like to remind everyone of our long and consistent history of dividend payments dating back to 1931, in addition to our unbroken 67-year history of annual dividend increases, which places us in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange which have achieved that result. I'd like to conclude our prepared remarks by thanking you for your interest in American States Water and will now turn the call over to the operator for questions. We will now take your questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble the roster. We will begin with a question from Angie Storozynski with Seaport. Please go ahead. Thank you. Okay. Maybe starting with the cost of capital proceeding. You've lowered your first quarter earnings to account for the lower cost of debt. Can you comment on the equity layer and the potential increase in the ROE? Maybe like a rule of thumb, every ten basis points of an increase in the ROE, how big an earnings impact it could have? And also how this requested 57% equity layer compares to the actual equity that you currently have. Okay, well, I'll start with the equity piece. We have requested 57% equity in the case. That's what our actuals have shown historically. Public Advocates report recommends equity layer of 56.85%. We're pretty close on that. Okay. Every 10 basis points of an increase in the ROE, how big of an earnings impact that would have? I think, Angie, if the ROE changes by 10 basis point, we're thinking about a little bit over $0.01 net earnings impact for every changes of 10 basis point. Okay. Okay, because you guys again maybe I'm just too optimistic, who knows, but you know, you in a sense lowered your numbers for the lower cost of equity, but without any you know potential offset that comes from you know the potentially higher ROE. I know that's a more conservative approach, but again, that's sort of understates your earnings versus those of your peers, at least as far as the first quarter is concerned. May I go into a little bit on that subject, Angie? Okay. You know, as you know, it's difficult to predict the final outcome of the pending result from this decision. However, given the significant increase in our cost of debt component alone, you know, we decreased from 6.6% to 5.1% in this proceeding, and we're pretty close to ORA's recommendation. So that's 150 basis point differences there. You know, high probability this piece being approved, and we'll have to refund this to customer. That's why we recorded $1.4 million for the lower cost of debt piece only in Q1 because it's very certain and known at this point. You know, it will be retroactive to January 1st. That's why we booked it in the first quarter. With regard to the other items, you know, ROE and cap structure, you know, at this time, we cannot really predict the outcome of the ROE, especially. The cap structure is pretty close. We think we'll win that piece. But we'll see the final decision. As some information become more available, we'll revise our estimate along the way. You know, I think we booked the cost of debt, which is pretty certain at this time. Okay, that's fine. Secondly, on the electric side, so I understand that you're gonna file a rate case in June. There was no growth in earnings in the first quarter. Can you talk about your expectations for the entire 2022, given that it's the last year of the current rate cycle? Would you expect some earnings growth for the electric segment year-over-year? Yeah, you accurately point out that it is the last year of the rate cycle. You wouldn't expect as much growth, I would say, in this case, year five, as you would see in earlier years. The other part of that is we are spending money on wildfire mitigation expenditures. We're spending them in advance of getting them in rate recovery. Those will be included in the general rate case that we file in June. Okay. The last thing, the earnings hit from the, you know, pension, the performance of parts of your pension funds. This $0.04 hit, that's a year-over-year hit, but can you say how that compares to, for instance, you know, your annual expectations? I know that you don't issue guidance, but how does that, you know, look versus what you had hoped for for 2022? Well, I, you know, when we're starting out the year, we didn't expect, what's happened in the stock market, over the course of the first three months of the year. we, you know, we generally typically expect a sort of net positive from the assets there. Mm-hmm. These things, you know, this is a timing difference we hope, and maybe you know better than we as to, you know, what the prospects for the S&P 500 are. Yeah, so, you know, this is timing. You know, last year, 2021, we had a very nice gain on those assets. These things are, you know, they do bounce around from year to year. Just circling back to the cost of capital in California. So, as you mentioned, the hearings are starting. You know, typically settlements happen before those hearings begin. Now, given that the record in this case was based on a completely different interest rate environment, not to mention valuations of water stocks, I mean, is it fair to say that you might be actually better off having this case fully litigated because it's gonna be then more reflective of the current interest rate environment? It's Angie, it's difficult to handicap that, to be honest. First of all, you do have an opportunity to continue to work on settlement. I think the way the rules are written, you have up until 30 days after the completion of the hearings to settle the case. Continued discussions are ongoing. We've got a relatively new commission with a couple of new commissioners there. Again, really difficult to handicap whether we'll get a better outcome by litigating it. You do make a very valid point that interest rates have moved up since we filed our testimony. That should help, I think, get a positive outcome here. I'm not saying we'll do better than the 8.9%, but I think the rising interest rate environment can only help the utilities in this case. Yeah. Well, fingers crossed. Thank you. Mm-hmm. Thank you, Angie. Our next question comes from Jonathan Reeder with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Hey, Bob and Eva. How are y'all today? Okay. Thank you, Jonathan. How are you? Not too bad. On the GRC, since it sounds like you're not expecting a final decision until Q3 at earliest, just wondering if you have a sense what the impact to, you know, the second quarter might be. Presumably, you know, it's greater than Q1 $0.09. Yeah, I think. Well, we don't have a number, do we, Eva? But- Yeah. I think you're right in terms of it'll be greater than $0.09 because more usage in Q2 than Q1. Right. Okay. Just my other question, could an adverse outcome in the cost of capital proceeding, you know, namely around the ROE, impact that goal of 7%+, you know, dividend CAGR over the long term? Or do you think the board, you know, would be comfortable letting the dividend payout ratio increase a bit, especially given the strength of the balance sheet and, you know, not having external equity needs? Yeah, I would think, Jonathan, that the board would take into account. You know, our payout ratio is real solid and there's. You know, we look at other water utilities, we look at the electrics that are highly regulated and highly regulated gas companies. You know, we as an industry in the water space are at the lower end of those payout ratios. I would think that if we got a negative outcome, we would still be pretty focused on meeting our dividend target of more than 7%. There's quite a bit of headroom in that payout ratio. Right. Okay. Well, hopefully it doesn't come to that. Hopefully, this rising interest rate environment does help you guys. Good luck as the hearings continue on today and the rest of the week. Look forward to seeing what comes out of it. Thank you, Jonathan. Thank you. Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Bob Sprowls for any closing remarks. Thank you, Joel. Yeah, I just want to wrap it up today by thanking all of you for your participation today and letting you know that we look forward to speaking with you in an, you know, for the next quarterly earnings call. Thank you all very much.