Good afternoon, and welcome to the Beam Global First Quarter 2022 Financial Results and Corporate Update conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Kathy McDermott, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you for participating in Beam Global's conference call for the first quarter of 2022. We appreciate your time today for joining us for this call. Joining me is Desmond Wheatley, President, CEO, and Chairman of Beam. Desmond will be providing an update on the recent activities at Beam, followed by a question and answer session. First, I'd like to communicate to you that during this call, management will be making forward-looking statements, including statements that address Beam's expectations for future performance or operational results. Forward-looking statements involve risks and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those statements. For more information about these risks, please refer to the risk factors described in Beam's most recently filed Form 10-K and other periodic reports filed with the SEC. The contents of this call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today, May 25, 2022. Except as required by law, Beam disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any information to reflect events or circumstances that occur after this call. Next, I would like to provide an overview of our financial results for Beam's first quarter ended March 31, 2022. In March 2022, we're excited to say that the company closed on its purchase of AllCell Technologies. The addition of energy storage solutions to our EV charging products is a great partnership with many synergies from a sales and manufacturing standpoint. Because this was an asset purchase, the first quarter of 2022 financial statements include the energy storage business from March 4 closing date through March 31, 2022. It is not included in the prior year comparison. For the first quarter of 2022, we reported revenues of $3.8 million, a 175% increase over $1.4 million reported for the first quarter of 2021. This was the highest revenue quarter in the company's history in a first quarter that is typically lower in revenue. The quarter includes $0.4 million for the energy storage business. Our sales to state agencies and municipalities continue to be our primary market at 69% of total revenues. We also increased our revenues to federal customers based on an increased investment in sales resources and consultants in the federal space. We also saw growth in the enterprise business segment as employees are heading back to the office and looking for EV charging. Gross loss in the quarter ended March 31, 2022 was $0.3 million, compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2021. The gross loss improved by 3 percentage points compared to the prior year as a result of the increased production volume, resulting in favorable fixed overhead absorption and improved labor efficiencies and utilization. These savings were partially offset by higher material costs for steel and other components due to supply chain shortages and other inflationary pressures. Operating expenses were $2 million for Q1 2022, compared to $1.1 million for Q1 2021. The increases were primarily due to the addition of AllCell expenses for March, increased investment in sales and marketing to support revenue growth and also increased legal and accounting services, partially due to the acquisition. The net loss was $2.3 million or $0.24 per share for the first quarter of 2022, compared to $1.3 million or $0.14 per share for the first quarter of 2021. At March 31, 2022, we had cash of $19.2 million compared to $21.9 million at December 31, 2021. The cash decrease was primarily from operating activities and the cash payment for working capital for the purchase of AllCell. Our working capital decreased from $24.6 million at December 31, 2021 to $21.8 million at March 31, 2022. I will now turn the call over to Desmond to provide a business update. Well, thank you, Kathy, and thank you to all of you who are listening and who support Beam Global. I'm speaking to you today from the H.C. Wainwright Conferences in Miami, Florida, where I've spent the last few days meeting with the investment community. My apologies in advance for any outside noises. It's not easy for me to control the environment here, but I'll push through whatever challenges may come my way, like I always do. 2021 was a year of records for Beam. Record revenues, record product deliveries, and record sales. We're continuing that record-breaking streak as we head into 2022 with a new record for quarterly revenues of $3.8 million, up from $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2021 and up from $3.4 million in the fourth quarter last year. Product deliveries in Q1 of 2022 were 250% of what they were in the same period last year. Now this is a metric which tells us much more of a story than perhaps might first meet the eye, because Q1 has often been a fairly weak quarter for us. Not surprisingly, in the past, we've crammed all the revenue we can into the fourth quarter to hit full-year results, and that's typically left us in a position of starting the new year with low or no backlog sometimes. We certainly did cram a lot of revenue into the fourth quarter of 2021, and it was in fact, until now, the best quarter in our history. Because our sales growth was so strong in 2021, particularly towards the end of the year, we did not exhaust our backlog even during that record-breaking quarter. On the contrary, we entered 2022 with the strongest combination of pipeline and backlog we have ever had. We also entered the year much better able to deliver on that backlog because of the excellent efforts of our operations and engineering teams in increasing our efficiency and ability to output products. These combined factors enabled us to make Q1 of 2022, far from being a weak quarter as historically been the case, rather the best quarter in our history with the highest revenues. That increase in revenues and deliveries continued another set of trends that we put in motion during 2021. Our relentless efforts to manage costs and to extract value from every facet of our business and the vendors and partners who support us continue to pay off in Q1 of 2022. You'd have to be in a coma to have missed the impact of inflation across the economy and across the globe. It seems as if everything is getting more expensive, and our observation is that that has been the case during the last several quarters. Our cost structure was impacted in Q1 by increasing cost of inventory, which we encountered during the second half of 2021, and also into the first quarter of this year. Those cost increases spanned the great variety of materials and components which we integrate into our end products. Steel, aluminum, copper, battery cells, semiconductors, and even mundane items like plasters and plastic parts all came with increased costs. Shipping, a very large cost component of our business, was impacted by higher diesel rates for our internal transportation resources and also by increased third-party transportation costs, which are no doubt being impacted by the same influences we're seeing. Yet, in the face of all these rising costs, which are outside of our control, we actually had a further 3% improvement in our gross profitability as a result of managing what was within our control. Our teams ground 3% out of our cost structure while everybody else's costs are going up. Cost per unit structure, I should be really specific on that. I've been reporting for some time that as our volumes increase, we'd see a reduced impact from fixed overheads. I've also reported that labor cost per unit would come down as our production cadence increase. Well, the numbers make reality out of my projections. We've seen at least a 10% increase in our BOM costs during the COVID and inflation period, and yet we've reduced our overall cost per unit produced. Combining the 10% increase in BOM costs with our 3% improvement to gross margins means that actually the Beam teams had about a 13% impact on cost per unit reductions through internal actions. Take note that the cost reductions we've caused to happen do not yet include the significant reductions in costs we anticipate as a result of integrating our own new battery solutions onto our products instead of using third-party solutions as we're still doing. Those further savings are in our very near future. By the way, we share the opinion of many experts that pricing stability should return this year. As a result of that externality and our own internal ongoing cost management efforts, we anticipate further improvements in gross profitability as the year rolls on and as our volumes increase. We certainly do expect volumes to increase. At the moment, our pipeline is well over $100 million. Adding our new battery company pipeline to that number takes it up significantly higher. We're seeing new and material opportunities from both government and enterprise. We've received purchase orders for our products from internationally recognized corporations, and we continue to advance opportunities for our Driving on Sunshine sponsored network from similarly recognizable corporate names. On the government side of the business, we continue to receive orders from municipal, county, state, and federal entities. We recently announced that we've been awarded a blanket purchase agreement from the federal government. This enhancement to our previously announced General Services Administration contract will make it even easier for federal entities to buy our products at a time when their requirements are rapidly increasing and the urgency around EV charging infrastructure is picking up steam. Many federal agencies will be taking delivery of electric vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2022 as part of the administration's requirement to move away from gasoline and diesel. There is, as yet, not enough charging for those vehicles. Time-consuming permitting, construction, and electrical work make it very difficult to install traditional grid-tied infrastructure on such a short timeframe. The lack of available grid circuit capacity in many of the intended EV charging locations is daily coming to light. It's also important to remember how important resiliency will be to these government fleet vehicles, and for all EVs for that matter. Our product's ability to continue to charge vehicles during blackouts and other utility grid failures is an increasingly important selling differentiator for us. Note that many other EV charging companies are starting to add energy storage to their installation, something we've been doing for decades. Theirs rely on the grid to recharge their batteries. Ours do not. Fleet operators get that, and as they become more reliant on EVs, they're becoming less forgiving of EV charging infrastructure that's only as reliable as the grid to which it's connected. Of course, these circumstances are what Beam Global's products address in a unique and well-protected manner. Urgency is music to our ears. Lack of utility grid capacity, while it's alarming, is a key ingredient to our success, and it is very real. Resiliency and the importance of maintaining vital fueling infrastructure during disasters is just what we do. In fact, many of the critical cornerstones of our business strategy over the last many years, cornerstones which previously were not recognized broadly, are now becoming central issues at both a local and national level. I believe we're firmly in the lead when it comes to addressing these challenges, and so it seems to our increasingly large portfolio of customers. If you're looking for proof of how mainstream and recognized our products were becoming, you need look no further than the front cover of the Federal Highway Administration's NEVI or National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program guidance document. This document offers program guidance on how the $7.5 billion slated for EV charging infrastructure should be allocated by the states and other agencies who will spend the money. The document only contains one image. It's a photograph, and it's on the front cover, and it's of our EV ARC systems providing DC fast charging at a rest area in California. That's right, our products are the only products pictured in the spending guidance document. Google it. It's a nice picture. Further recognition at the federal level came when Congressman Peters recently named us and our products specifically during a televised House Committee on Energy and Commerce hearing, saying that Beam Global is creating the sort of innovative products that will be essential to transportation and energy in the future. The essential nature of our products found yet another new opportunity to shine this quarter when the Marine Corps and others used it for a wildfire fighting exercise in California. Now, who would have thought of that when first looking at Beam Global? There are just so many areas where reliable power that does not rely on liquid fuels or the utility grid is essential. More and more agencies and corporations are looking to Beam Global to provide that power. 2 or 3 weeks ago, I was with a new, very large corporate customer. The person I met with has responsibility for around 500 buildings in the company's network. She's done an excellent job of installing grid-tied charging at many of those locations, and yet there I was meeting with her, and she told me that, and I quote, "We saved her ass." It turns out that she needs more charging in those locations and has been informed that there's not sufficient grid capacity on her properties to add more chargers, but she needs them, so she's turned to us. Our EV ARC product is solving her problem. Now, I've been commenting on this future certainty for many years, and now that future is here. Just think of all the buildings across the U.S. which have tapped their capacity and will need more charging in the future. The opportunity for second wave deployments for us is fantastic, solving for all those people who used up their grid capacity in the first waves of EV charging deployments that they did in the traditional grid-type method. I'm very happy to solve that problem for them because they will need more chargers after they run out of circuit than they needed when they used up what was available to them. By the way, I just took delivery of a brand-new Rivian R1T pickup truck this week. I think I made the down payment about two years ago, and I can tell you it was worth the wait. 0- 60 in 3 seconds in a pickup truck. You have to experience it to believe it. When you do, you will be certain of one thing. EVs are going to own the future, and they're gonna do it a lot sooner than many anticipate. That means that there'll be a whole lot of demand for our products because the EVs will come a lot faster than the grid upgrades. I believe we'll see many more customers like the one I just described to you, who need charging but don't have available circuits. Lots and lots of new customers with urgent needs. While we're getting a lot of new attention and orders from entities with whom we've not done business in the past, we're still providing solutions for some of our excellent current and past customers. Just about the best endorsement of a product you can get. For example, the California Department of General Services, who last year gave us the biggest order we've received in our history, so far that is, continues to order meaningful volumes of our EV ARC product. We recently received purchase orders for 23 more units to be delivered in the coming months. The combination of year-to-date revenue, booked backlog, record high pipeline, and the integration of new revenues and pipeline from our battery business are setting 2022 up to be an excellent year and a launchpad for many more excellent years thereafter. We're advising our customers to get their orders in as soon as possible, especially large orders, so that we can get them into our increasingly crowded order queue. Our acquisition of AllCell Technologies, which closed on March fourth, 2022, is moving through its integration stage of evolution. Beam Global's energy storage business has already made significant sales, like the $2.3 million order we received shortly after closing the transaction. This is adding to our backlog and revenue, and we're delivering orders on those orders today. We're also in the final stages, and I'm very excited about this, of development of a new Beam Pack battery solution for our EV ARC products, which will be integrated into all EV ARCs soon. We expect the first EV ARCs to leave our San Diego factory with Beam Packs in them as early as the beginning of June. The packs are being manufactured in our Chicago facility. I've seen them, and I'm delighted with their quality, ability to scale, and also, crucially, cost. Because remember, bringing down the cost of batteries will have a significant impact on bringing down our overall cost per unit. Battery supply chains are under a lot of pressure at the moment. During the last few months, we've seen cost increases for battery cells for the first time in over 10 years that I've been involved in this industry. There are further cost increases to come before we return to what the entire industry expects, a prolonged and inexorable lowering of battery cell prices. These are extraordinary times indeed. Had we not made this acquisition, it's quite possible that we would not have received sufficient batteries to fulfill our charging business' requirements. We did make the acquisition, and we're now about to backfill shortages elsewhere with our own superior product and at a lower cost. I'm delighted. Even the first generation of packs that we're producing are costing us less than we were paying for externally sourced product. I believe the cost-cutting journey for battery storage is only just beginning. Our engineers and scientists on both the charging and the storage side of the business are working together to engineer battery solutions which are ideal for our products and at significantly lower costs than the more generic packs we've been using to date. There's never been a more important time to take control of battery supply chains, and while we still see cost increases on commodity cells, steel, conductors, and other components used in making these battery packs, we are confident that we can continue to reduce the cost contributions to our charging products. Remember that batteries constitute not far off one-third of our bill of materials, so any cost savings we can achieve in this area will be meaningful to our overall cost model. Beyond that, we're very excited by the other areas of our battery business and by the opportunities which we see. The world is increasingly electrifying, and the move to untethered battery-powered products is plain for anyone to see. We intend to advance our technology leadership in thermal management, safety, energy density, and data, so that our batteries offer the best, safest, and most connected solution for an increasing universe of customers. Being able to provide safety from thermal runaway, that's fires and explosion for those of us who are not experts, and also superior level of data connectivity at the battery level will, I believe, be significant differentiators for us. Energy density, long life, safety, and telemetry are key ingredients to successful battery integration, and we've demonstrated abilities in each area today and a roadmap of developments which will soon further enhance our leadership in these important opportunities. To sum up, we remain well-capitalized. We have no debt. We have record revenues, record product deliveries, record backlog and pipeline of opportunities. We're cutting our costs even in the face of historically high inflation, and we're increasing our throughput and efficiency. We uniquely have a battery storage solution which is central to our own products and the products of our battery-only customers. We've diversified our revenue opportunities while defending our most critical supply chain, and we've positioned ourselves to take advantage of the unprecedented spending in EV charging, energy security, and carbon reduction efforts that are taking place at both governmental and enterprise levels. Business is never without challenges, but I can tell you that thanks to the efforts and dedication of the Beam team, ours is going according to plan. From my point of view, Beam Global has never been better positioned with so many growing opportunities and an improved ability to execute on them. It's a great time to be on the Beam team. Thank you for your attention, and I'll now return the call to the operator and answer any questions you may have. Operator? We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question is from Greg Lewis with BTIG. Please go ahead. Hi, Greg. Yeah. Hey, thank you and good afternoon, Desmond. You know, hope you're doing well. You know, clearly you know, you're doing a good job on execution. I did have a question. Clearly the government and military opportunity is a huge potential growth opportunity for the company. As we think about the event path of that, as you work with these customers, how should we think about the timing of the ordering of the EV ARCs versus the ordering of the vehicles? i.e., are some of these entities trying to get their hands on EV ARCs ahead of ordering, or is it kind of a chicken and egg? Any kind of thoughts around that? Yeah. You've uncovered multiple areas as you usually do, Greg. Let me try and address them. The first thing I want to point out to you is that, yes, the government side of our business remains very vibrant and there's a lot of growth ahead of us for that. Cast your mind back to Kathy's opening comments, where she pointed out that our traditional sort of state and municipal business was only 70% of our revenues. I mean, only, right, that's a lot, but it also shows you that there was 30% coming from other opportunities, and I think we're gonna see an increase in that as we've said before, post-COVID return to work, return to corporate type of environments. While I'm thrilled with the government business, and we're gonna continue to thrash it, don't think of us as a government-only business. We're far from that. Now, to your other question about the sort of cadence of ordering, it might not be surprising to anybody listening to this call to find that there are government entities who have electric vehicles who are coming to them and do not yet have charging infrastructure in place for them. I don't mean that to sound unkind, I just mean it's one of those things no one's ever really done before, so no one's really been sure on the timing of these things. You know, again, not wishing to sound unkind or exploitative, this is excellent for us. The simple fact of the matter is if you're a government agency who receives a bunch of electric vehicles in the fourth quarter of this year and you don't have any charging infrastructure, what's happening is at the moment, you're starting to look around and figure out what does that mean. What you're learning is that by the time you go through permitting and electrical work and construction work and environmental impact studies and figuring out that you don't have enough grid capacity in the locations where you need to put the charging and all that stuff, by the time you do all that, you're in serious danger of ending up with a bunch of electric vehicles with no way to charge them. Nobody wants to see that happen. That would just be unhelpful in every way possible, not to mention a terrible use of taxpayers' dollars. We can solve that problem for them, and we have a GSA contract in place, which has now been enhanced with the BPA, the blanket purchase agreement. It means that those people who are behind or who are worried that they won't be able to get charging infrastructure traditionally installed fast enough can come to us, and we can solve that problem for them. By God, we're gonna have to ramp up to do that to come anywhere near meeting their requirements and that's a central part of our focus right now. Then beyond that, for those, even those who do the grid-tie charging initially, like the other customer I mentioned to you, they're gonna run out of capacity at some point. We're on the radar now. We're talking to them. We're, we've invested in government relations. We've invested in direct federal sales and other activities, and it's very gratifying to see how much attention we're getting at the federal level right now. I think it's gonna be a mixture of all of the above. In every instance, it will result in nothing but increased demand for us and I believe, a very dramatic increased demand. Okay, great. I did wanna talk, you know, I guess nice job on seeing the margin progression. You know, it looks like it improved a couple hundred basis points sequentially. What has been- 300 basis points to be precise. Yeah. Yep, yeah. Well, what has customer feedback been around, you know, the stickiness of pricing? The reason I ask that is, you know, whether it's the steel or the energy storage piece or the solar panels or the wage labor, you know, I have to believe most of the inputs in producing the unit is going higher. Now, clearly, volumes are also improving. What has kind of been, you know? Obviously, it's a product that, you know, the buyers need. How should we be thinking about, you know, ASPs as we kind of move forward in this year? Yes, it's a subject which gets an awful lot of attention from us, frankly. I am still very heavily focused on winning market share and increasing volumes. I think that has got to be the most important thing that we do. We want large orders. We wanna turn them through the factory. We wanna grind cost out of the product. I'm convinced there's still a lot of room for cost reduction as we increase our volumes. The focus is heavily on bringing in the sales. Now, that said, we have had a lot of internal discussions around increasing our prices because we are at very good value. You know, in hundreds of deployments across the U.S. and internationally, in just about every instance, the cost of our unit was less than the cost of avoided construction and electrical work. The energy is free for essentially after that. We're very good value, and that means that you'd think there's an opportunity for increasing our prices, and we have talked about that. I can tell you right now, our tendency is to not increase the sticker price of the product, but we have had discussions, and actually, I think we're putting into effect some instances where there will be an inflationary surcharge, if you like. This is something that gives us some latitude. We can remove it in the future if costs stabilize as we anticipate, and also if our costs come down, and without giving people a sticker shock, because they see the price going up. We're still dealing with an audience, frankly, that is not educated in this space. Again, that's not to be unkind. They just haven't had experience with it. We're still dealing with an audience who has difficulty figuring out how a ChargePoint charger can be $6,500 and an EV ARC can be $65,000. That sounds like it's ten times more expensive, because they don't yet know how expensive it's gonna be to go through the construction, electrical work, and all the other things. That takes a bit of an education. We want to bring them in. We wanna win big orders. We wanna improve our profitability through reducing costs. As I say, there's still a lot of opportunity to do that. But we are definitely looking very seriously at responding to inflationary pressures through some pricing increases, but probably, you know, delivered as a line item on the proposal at some kind of surcharge, which we think the customer base will understand and probably be more ready to accept and digest than a simple just a blanket cost increase without explanation. Okay. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you for the time, everybody. Thanks, Greg. The next question is from Tate Sullivan with Maxim Group. Please go ahead. Hello, Tate. Thank you. Hi, Des. Hello, Desmond. You going back to your comments on the Beam Pack, did I hear you say are you going out and replacing the batteries in EV ARCs that are already deployed with that? Or is that just in future EV ARCs? No, we will not do that. We've no requirement to do that. No. What's so exciting about the Beam Pack is that, we are, you know, we acquired AllCell Technologies on March fourth. That wasn't very long ago. Time goes by very, very quickly when you're doing this stuff. Yet the teams have been working very hard. The engineering teams in San Diego on the charging side of the business and on the energy storage side of the business, and they have already produced a custom tailored pack for our products, the Beam Pack. We have not been installing them in our products to date. What's important for you to understand, the other callers to understand, or the other listeners to understand, is that the gross profits that you're seeing right now do not reflect the reduction in cost that we anticipate from using our own internal battery packs. However, those packs are being produced, even as I'm speaking to you, and through an incredibly accelerated timeline, and they will be introduced into our products, I believe the first week of June when we get the first shipment out of our Chicago facility into San Diego, to put into our first EV ARC. If not the first week of June, it'll be sometime in June. What that means is that from that time forward, the EV ARCs will be going out with our own custom battery packs in them. Those are better. We'll get better make a better product, essentially. It's easier to integrate them into our product, which will mean ultimately a reduction in labor costs of integration. Most importantly, they're a good deal less expensive because we're only, you know, paying the cost basis. We're not paying the margins and everything else. That's just the beginning of that cost reduction move. That's the key thing to understand. It's not that we would contemplate replacing batteries in the field because we're not having any problems with any of the batteries we have in the field. Certainly moving forward, our products will have our own integrated packs, save us a lot of money, better product, and also give us an opportunity to really start grinding out costs in the future. There's just one other thing, one other comment I wanna make about the Beam Pack. It turns out that the kilowatt-hour requirements that we have for our products come in increments which are very similar to lots of other users' kilowatt-hour requirements. That's not all that surprising really, when you think about it. As a result of this Beam Pack that we're making, we intend for it to become a core and standard battery pack that we can mass produce, and not only put into our own products, but also use extensively in other people's applications. That, once we do that, will allow us to move to further automation in the manufacturing of those packs and further mass production, which will result, we believe, in further cost reductions and a lot more revenue opportunities. Because now customers who have had to wait for a solution, a bespoke solution or an engineered solution or something, we'll be able to hand them something that solves all their problems, you know, not off the shelf exactly, but without having to go through a lot of development. There's a whole lot of opportunity coming out of this battery business. Every day I thank God I did that. I made that acquisition, particularly in light of the supply chain and everything else, but it's gonna have excellent ripple-down effects across many aspects of our business. Yeah, great point on seeing other charging companies start to try to do batteries and products as well too. Then circling back on the customer with 500 buildings, I imagine they can do a quite compelling analysis on how much they're paying for extra electricity for charging as well. Is that customer, if you can share, a repeat customer, or is that a new potential customer? By the way, just on your first comment, let's remember that those batteries that other EV charging companies are integrating into their EV charging installations are grid dependent. You're not getting resiliency out of that. When the grid goes down, you're not recharging those batteries. I think it's very important to point that out because I don't want people thinking that you know, what we've been doing for 10 years is being replicated by others now. It isn't. Just adding batteries to a grid-tied installation maybe gives you one more charge for a vehicle, but doesn't get you that kind of resiliency that we offer to all our customers, and that's a key differentiator for us. To answer your, the core part of your question, the customer with 500 buildings that I was talking, no, it's a new customer. You're absolutely right. They have a lot of data. I think the really important takeaway from that is this second wave deployment thing. People often say to me, "Oh, well, so and so's already got EV chargers, so therefore you don't have an opportunity with them." Well, that may be true today, but as there are more and more Rivians and F-150 Lightnings and all the incredible variety of electric vehicles that are coming out here and hitting us, parking lots are just going to be full of EVs. They're all gonna expect to charge. What all these building operators who have already deployed, you know, to their great credit, by the way, grid-tied EV charging are going to discover is that the next wave, or perhaps the wave after the next wave, will be either massively more expensive because they're gonna have to do a lot more trenching and put in a lot more electrical infrastructure or just impossible. Because I can tell you what happens is it's not just your own building that runs out of capacity, your own parking lot that runs out of capacity. Pretty soon you get to the point where the local substation that's serving all the buildings around you runs out of capacity, and then that will require substation upgrade. That's a very expensive and time-consuming process. Of course, when enough substations have to be upgraded, you need a new power station and all the transmission infrastructure that goes along with it. This is a kind of a dominoes thing, which is certainly coming. I've been saying it for 10 years, and a lot of people rolled their eyes when I was saying it. Now it's a reality which people are having to live with. We are solving the problem, and it ends up being a bigger and bigger opportunity for us as every day goes by, as every EV is sold, and as every EV charger is installed on the grid, that's one less that will be able to be installed on the grid as we move forward. We saw it in this very local way with this existing customer. I again just love hearing that, "You saved our ass," she said. I mean, that's just fantastic to hear from any customer, particularly a brand-new one with a huge opportunity. By the way, we are not deploying in all 500 of her buildings. Don't start writing me notes about that or anything else. This is the beginning with her. She's, you know, fantastic that she picked us and that she views us in the way that she does. As is usually the case with us, when we end up deploying, you know, a few products for a customer, and it's quite a few, by the way, so it's not one or two, but when we do that, they more often than not come back for more. Thank you, Desmond. Thank you, Tate. The next question is from James McCullough, a private investor. Please go ahead. Hello, James. Yeah. Hi. Yeah, two questions. First one is there any R&D going on to improve the survivability of the systems in adverse weather events? Obviously, that's probably your key differentiator as well as the construction cost issue. But just on survivability, is there any way, whether it's dismantling solar panels or anything that could be done to improve the survivability in an adverse weather event? That's the first question. And then the second question was on international market opportunities. If there's a concerted effort, whether it be in Europe or Australia, the Southeast Asia to penetrate markets, and if so, if there's any discussion going on on a JV greenfield or is it too early for that kind of a capital investment? Yeah, those are both excellent questions. Let's talk about survivability first, and let's talk about the realities that exist today. Our product is rated now, actually an improvement of 5 miles per hour. Previously, it was rated 100-mile-per-hour winds. That means, when I say rated, I mean, an independent agency has taken a look at the thing, done all their calculations and said that we'll survive 100-mile-per-hour winds. We have just increased that now to 125 miles. 5 miles doesn't sound like a lot, but I'll tell you what, those wind events of those sorts get exponentially more rare for every mile per hour you add to that sort of equation. Now, that's what they're rated for. We know that they have survived 185-mile-per-hour Category 5 winds in the Caribbean. We know that we got a letter. We have this letter still from our customer who's the government down there saying that our products were the only thing that survived those hurricane storms. That I went right over the top of it. Frankly, even I was surprised. I know we build a very robust product. Even I was surprised that we survived the sheer ferocity when I saw videos of, you know, buildings flying around and stuff like that and cars being overturned. Very robust from that point of view. Now, the other thing is in terms of advancing it, just a couple of years ago, we were not flood proof. Well, we were flood proof to about 6.5 inches actually. Today, the product is flood proof to 9.5 feet. It requires a 9.5-foot inundation to destroy our product. That is incredibly rare in the sorts of locations where we're deployed. You know, waist-high water, yes, you know, in the streets and that sort of stuff, storm surge or whatever else. But 9.5 feet almost never happens. What that means is when you compare our product during a Hurricane Ida or something like that, when you compare our products to grid side infrastructure, which are all destroyed during those sorts of events. Don't forget, it's not just the charger. The conduit, the transformers, the switchgear, everything leading up to that charger, everything that's in that flood zone, destroyed. Actually ripped out, great expense and disruption and replaced. Our products on the other hand, the minute the waters roll back, you can move a car up to them and charge them. In fact, if you dare, you can even approach them during the flood event and plug into the emergency power panel from a boat or something. I don't know if that's happened yet, but it will one of these days because we still have power up there available during those types of events. We've made a lot of advances already. That those are two, increasing the wind speed and the flood proofing that's come up. I'll tell you, we'll never stop working to make the product better. I don't think actually that we really need to concentrate a lot on resiliency at the moment. Certainly, one of the other aspects that we've done is because we've bought this battery technology company whose current chief claim to fame is their ability to prevent thermal runaway, stop batteries catching fire and exploding and doing all the other things like that. Certainly integrating those into our product gives it yet more resiliency and more safety. It's already very robust. Any improvements that we can make to it, we will of course do that as through the never-ending process of improvement. To your question about international expansion, I've made no secret that I'm very interested in going to Europe. Whether we acquire our way into Europe, partner our way into Europe, or bootstrap our way into Europe is still a work in progress. I'm looking at opportunities. It's definitely the biggest EV market in the world. I think our products will be more popular there than they are in the United States. You know, Edinburgh, where I'm from in Scotland, if you dig down 6 inches, you go back 300 years of history. Digging trenches and foundations and all that sort of stuff, the Europeans are much more sensitive about environmental impact of those sorts of things. Being able to bring a product in, drop it off and charge cars with nothing but locally generated renewable energy, seems like a real winner. By the way, it more than seems like it. I know it. I've had enough conversations with people over there. I'm very intent on going to Europe. We've got a lot on our plate at the minute. We just finished this acquisition. Looking at other opportunities. Yes, it's a high priority for me to go there. You brought up Australia. It's interesting that you brought up Australia because, of course, they're very far behind on EVs, but they do have a new administration now, who's gonna hopefully reverse Australia's trend of ignoring the climate and the environment, which is what they've been doing for the last several decades. One of the areas that we've seen a lot of interest from Australia, frankly, is with aircraft. Last year, we set the world record for the longest flight of a production electric airplane anywhere. It's a real world record, by the way. We didn't make it up. Oddly enough, we got a lot of press for that, and we got a lot of people coming to us from Australia, where, of course, they have a much higher reliance on small aircraft because of the vast distances that they have to cover. You know, they are deploying doctors and things like that. We get a lot of interest from them because they need charging infrastructure just like everybody else does. It's very difficult to put charging infrastructure into airports. Not for us. Very easy for us to do it. It's certainly a funny thing you brought up Australia. I must admit, it's not a big area of focus for us at the moment. Europe is a much bigger area of focus, but, I intend to expand internationally, where, as I've often said, we're called Beam Global, not Beam San Diego. I remember in one, I think it was a year ago on one of your conference calls, a quarter was impacted just by a freight charge on a shipment to the, I think it was the state of Hawaii. Yep. Based on a, it was a contracted price which included freight. Obviously- Yep. When you're dealing with, it's fairly heavy equipment from what I understand, and you're dealing with some pretty significant freight costs, I'm guessing. It sounds like Europe would be a tremendous opportunity, not just given the growth in EVs and the political climate, but I would guess also you might have some fairly unique solutions there too. You're quite right. By the way, you actually bring up something else very interesting, and I probably should have mentioned it in my comments. I'm very intent on bringing battery manufacturing from Chicago into San Diego. Not at the expense of Chicago, in addition to Chicago. That's because it will make a lot of sense for us to produce our new proprietary batteries right where we produce our charging products in our San Diego factory. We've got some space to do that there. I'm really interested in doing that, particularly because of a lot of government incentive money to help me get that done. Similarly, we are considering moving some EV ARC manufacturing and our other charging products manufacturing into the Midwest. Again, not at the expense of San Diego. It's an expansive move. A big part of the reason for that is what you just pointed out. Products are heavy and bulky. We ship a lot into the Northeast and to other parts of the country. It would be a lot less expensive, a lot more efficient to do that from the Midwest. These are things which are very much on our, you know, on the whiteboard, on the roadmap and for planning. We generally get to things. We generally do what we say we're going to do. Sometimes it takes a bit longer than I want it to, but if we're planning it, we generally do it. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. Please stand by as we poll for questions. Showing no further questions, this concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Desmond Wheatley for any closing remarks. I think we've covered a lot of stuff here today. We just had a record-breaking quarter following a record-breaking year. We've got record-breaking pipeline and backlog combinations, our new battery company, and the ops team is doing a fantastic job of producing products and getting out. It's, as I said earlier, never without challenges, but that's what we're here to do. If it was easy, everybody'd be doing it, right? It's just everything is positioning very well for us for the future of electric vehicles, for the requirement of EV charging infrastructure like we make. I'm thrilled to be doing what I'm doing for a living. Thank you all for that opportunity. Thank you all for listening today and for being involved with Beam. Like I said, it's a great time to be on the Beam team. Thank you. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.