Good morning, and welcome to Bread Financial's third quarter two thousand and twenty-four earnings conference call. My name is Michelle, and I'll be coordinating your call today. At this time, all parties have been placed on listen-only mode. Following today's presentation, the floor will be open for your questions. To register a question, please press star followed by one-one. It is now my pleasure to introduce Mr. Brian Vehr, Head of Investor Relations at Bread Financial. The floor is yours. Thank you. Copies of the slides we will be reviewing and the earnings release can be found in the investor relations section of our website at breadfinancial.com. On the call today, we have Ralph Andretta, President and Chief Executive Officer and Perry Beberman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that some of the comments made on today's call and some of the responses to your questions may contain forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management's current expectations and assumptions and are subject to the risks and uncertainties described in the company's earnings release and other filings with the SEC. Also, on today's call, our speakers will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe will provide useful information for investors. Reconciliation of those measures to GAAP are included in our quarterly earnings materials posted on our investor relations website. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Ralph Andretta. Thank you, Brian, and good morning to everyone joining the call. Before I begin, I wanted to start by sending our thoughts to those impacted by the recent hurricanes. To underscore our commitment to the customers and communities we serve, we are increasing this year's financial support to the American Red Cross for emergency relief efforts. Additionally, we are providing payment accommodations to support customers impacted in the affected regions. We wish our customers and everyone affected continued safety during the recovery efforts. Now to our presentation. Starting with key highlights from the third quarter on slide two. Our third quarter results demonstrated our commitment to growing our business responsibly and allocating capital to reduce risk and improve our balance sheet. We continue to execute on our strategic objectives on strengthening our balance sheet by using cash on hand to repurchase $262 million of our convertible notes. The repurchase impacted our GAAP results for the quarter, including expenses, net income, and earnings per share. Accordingly, we provided reconciliations in our earnings materials to our adjusted or non-GAAP results, which we believe will help stakeholders more clearly evaluate the ongoing operations of the company. Additionally, our overall funding mix continued to improve with strong direct-to-consumer deposit growth and reduced wholesale deposit funding. For the quarter, we generated adjusted net income of $93 million and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $1.83, both adjusted to exclude the $91 million post-tax impact from the premium paid on our repurchased convertible notes. Tangible book value per share of $47.48 increased 12% year-over-year, while our Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio increased 40 basis points year-over-year to 13.3%. During the quarter, we completed the portfolio acquisition and launch of the Saks Fifth Avenue Credit Card. Also, in October, we launched a Hard Rock Credit Card program. We are excited to share our cross-channel expertise with these partners, enabling us to deliver strong value propositions to our customers. Turning to the consumer, spending patterns have remained consistent with the second quarter as consumers made more frequent shopping trips with lower transaction sizes. Spending continues to be more heavily weighted towards non-discretionary purchases, which are enabled by our expanded co-brand and proprietary products, along with back-to-school items at apparel and discount stores. While inflation continuing to normalize, gas prices declining, growth in real wages, and a stable labor market, we are starting to see signs of stabilization in credit sales and still expect a gradual economic recovery. To offset the potential impact of the CFPB's final rule on credit card late fees, we continue to execute on our mitigation strategy in close coordination with our brand partners. We have various pricing changes in the market, including increased APRs and statement fees. While uncertainty remains surrounding the timing and the outcome of ongoing litigation related to the rule, we remain confident in our ability to generate strong returns and achieve our long-term strategic objectives and financial targets, regardless of the litigation outcome. As discussed at our Investor Day, we are in a position of strength with increased capital flexibility and financial resilience, and are well-equipped to address market volatility and uncertainty, enabling us to generate sustainable long-term value for our shareholders. Slide 3 depicts the results of our disciplined capital allocation strategy, which focuses on funding responsible, profitable growth, improving our capital metrics, reducing parent debt, and driving long-term shareholder value. Our Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio increased 270 basis points since 2021 to 13.3%, showing meaningful progress towards our medium-term target of approximately 14%. Our efforts to optimize our capital and debt stacks are ongoing. Over the last three years, we have reduced parent debt by 62%. Our double leverage ratio is now well below our target of less than 115%, and we anticipate that this will remain below our target going forward. Finally, our tangible book value of more than $47 per share has grown at 15% compounded annual rate since the third quarter of 2021. Supported by our strong cash flow generation, we expect our tangible book value to continue to grow. Turning to Slide four, the chart on the left reflects the diversification of our product suite. Our fully integrated suite of products consists of private label, co-brand, proprietary, and Bread Pay, which is our installment lending and buy now, pay later platform. Together, these products have improved our loan portfolio and our credit risk profile. Our expanded product suite has led to gains in consumers' wallet share and more non-discretionary spend, particularly as consumers have shifted their spending patterns given macroeconomic pressures. Co-brand and proprietary represent more than 50% of our total credit card sales, and we expect this ongoing shift to continue in the light of the current economic outlook and potential regulatory changes. Shifting to the chart on the right, we are well diversified across our approximately one hundred brand partners, with several recent partner additions in electronics and travel and entertainment. As a result, travel and entertainment is now our largest vertical from a sales perspective, at 32% of total credit sales. We are confident that our product and industry vertical diversification provides stability and will help us reach our long-term financial targets while delivering strong, sustainable shareholder returns. Turning to Slide five, throughout the year, we have focused on growing responsibly, managing the macroeconomic and regulatory environment, accelerating digital and technology capabilities, and driving operational excellence. Our product and portfolio diversification, along with our proactive credit management and disciplined capital allocation, are key to growing responsibly. We closely monitor trends in consumer sentiment and spending and payment behavior. In turn, we can then adjust credit and marketing plans to meet our partners' and customers' needs while delivering strong risk-adjusted returns. As you have heard me say, we will continue to invest in our digital and technology capabilities and deliver operational excellence to improve the customer experience, enhance enterprise-wide efficiency, reduce risk, and create value. In summary, our experienced leadership team remains focused on generating strong returns through prudent capital and risk management. We have an unwavering commitment to drive sustainable, profitable growth, building long-term value for our shareholders throughout an ever-changing economic and regulatory environment. Now I'll turn it over to Perry to review the quarter's financials and to discuss our outlook. Thanks, Ralph. Slide six provides our third quarter financial highlights. Before I review the financials, I will provide details on the impacts from the repurchases of a large portion of our convertible notes in the quarter. As you can see, our third quarter financial results were impacted by our strategic decision to repurchase $262 million, or 83%, in principal amount of our convertible notes. The transactions resulted in $96 million of additional pre-tax expense, partly offset by a $5 million favorable tax impact and a $67 million reduction to equity in the quarter. To facilitate the repurchase, our bank boards approved a $400 million dividend to the parent company. As a result of our actions, $54 million in principal value of our convertible notes remain outstanding. Additionally, when we issued our convertible notes in the second quarter of 2023, we also entered into capped call transactions, which are designed to reduce potential dilution to our common stock and/or offset certain cash payments we may be required to make in excess of the principal amount of the convertible notes. We strategically chose to leave 100% of the capped calls outstanding, and they therefore remain available to potentially offset certain of the dilution impacts of the remaining convertible notes. Effectively, we have potential share dilution protection up to a share price of nearly $135 at maturity. I also wanted to point out that this quarter, the dilution impact of the remaining convertible notes on our diluted EPS was negligible, so we did not provide adjusted diluted EPS reflecting the offsetting value of the capped calls this quarter. However, as I mentioned, this offset remains in place. Now, shifting to the financial highlights. During the quarter, credit sales of $6.5 billion decreased 3% year-over-year, reflecting moderating consumer spend and our ongoing strategic credit tightening, partially offset by new partner growth. Average loans of $17.8 billion in the third quarter increased 1% year-over-year, benefiting from new partner growth. Revenue was $1.0 billion in the quarter, down 5% year-over-year, primarily due to lower late fees resulting from our gradual shift in product mix, leading to a lower proportion of private label accounts. Additionally, we had lower merchant discount fees driven by lower big-ticket credit sales as consumers pulled back on large discretionary purchases. Total non-interest expenses, net income, income from continued operations, and diluted EPS have all been adjusted for the impact from our repurchased convertible notes, which primarily represented the premium paid. All adjusted figures are non-GAAP financial measures, and a reconciliation table can be found at the bottom of the slide, as well as in the appendix, along with our non-GAAP financial measures. Adjusted total non-interest expenses decreased 5%, excluding the $96 million pre-tax impact from our repurchased convertible notes. The decline was driven by a reduction in card and processing expenses, which was primarily due to lower fraud losses. Adjusted income from continued operations was $94 million, and adjusted diluted EPS was $1.84, excluding the $91 million after-tax impact from our repurchased convertible notes, both impacted by a higher provision for credit losses in the quarter. Looking at the financials in more detail on Slide seven, total net interest income for the quarter decreased 4% year-over-year, driven by lower late fees, while non-interest income is down $3 million, primarily the result of lower merchant discount fees. Total non-interest expenses increased $72 million or 14% year-over-year, driven by the $96 million pre-tax impact from the premium paid on our repurchased convertible notes, partly offset by a 26% reduction in card and processing expenses of $27 million. Excluding the impact from our repurchased convertible notes, total expenses decreased 5%. Additional details on expense drivers can be found in the appendix of the slide deck posted on our website. Pre-tax, pre-provision earnings, or PPNR, decreased $120 million or 23%, primarily driven by the $96 million pre-tax impact from our repurchased convertible notes. Excluding gains on portfolio sales and the impact from our repurchased convertible notes, PPNR decreased 5% for the quarter and increased 1% on a year-to-date basis. Turning to Slide 8. Loan yield decreased of 100 basis points year-over-year, primarily due to our continued shift in product mix, leading to lower billed late fees, in addition to higher reversal of interest and fees due to higher gross credit losses in the quarter. Both loan yield of 27.4% and net interest margin of 18.8% were higher sequentially, following typical seasonal trends. On the funding side, we are seeing our funding cost rate moderate as savings accounts and new term CDs have begun to decline with the recent Fed rate cut and lower U.S. Treasury rates. Additionally, as you can see on the bottom right chart, our funding mix continues to improve, fueled by growth in direct-to-consumer deposits, which increased to $7.5 billion at quarter end, while we continue to reduce wholesale deposits. Direct-to-consumer deposits accounted for 41% of our average funding, up from 35% a year ago. Concurrently, wholesale deposits decreased from 40% to 32%. While we anticipate that direct-to-consumer deposits will continue to grow steadily, we will maintain the flexibility provided by our diversified funding sources, including secured and wholesale funding, to efficiently fund and manage our long-term growth objectives. I'll also note that in October, we extended the maturity of our $700 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility to October 2028 with improved terms. These improved terms include updated covenants that provide additional future capital action flexibility, further evidence and recognition of the positive actions that we have taken to strengthen our balance sheet and our commitment to disciplined capital management. Moving on to Slide nine. Our delinquency rate for the third quarter was 6.4%, up 40 basis points seasonally from the second quarter. From this point forward, we expect future quarters to largely follow historical seasonal trends, subject to continued broad macroeconomic improvements and gradual benefits from our strategic credit tightening. The net loss rate was 7.8% for the quarter, compared to 6.9% in the third quarter of 2023 and 8.6% in the second quarter of 2024. The third quarter net loss rate is expected to be the low point for the year, although the fourth quarter will see some timing benefit from the customer-friendly actions we have taken for customers impacted by the recent hurricanes, as Ralph mentioned. These actions will result in a reduction to fourth quarter 2024 losses and an increase in the second quarter of 2025 losses, simply reflecting timing as we support our affected customers. Overall, our baseline outlook assumes a slow, gradual improvement in the macroeconomic environment, as it will take time for the effects of a prolonged period of elevated inflation to be fully absorbed by our consumers. As expected, the reserve rate of 12.2% remained within the range we have seen over the past seven quarters. In this challenging macroeconomic environment and uncertain outlook, our conservative economic scenario weightings remained unchanged in our credit reserve modeling, and we believe our loan loss reserve provides an appropriate margin of protection. Compared to year-end 2023, we expect the year-end 2024 reserve rate to be flat to slightly lower, reflecting stability in delinquencies and the overall credit quality in the portfolio. Further, our total loss absorption capacity, comprised of total company tangible common equity plus credit reserve rate, ended the quarter at 25% of total loans, an increase of 140 basis points from a year ago, demonstrating a strong margin of protection should more adverse economic conditions arise. Looking at our credit risk mix distribution, the percentage of cardholders with a 660-plus credit score remained relatively flat over the past seven quarters and above pre-pandemic levels, despite continued inflationary pressures. This is primarily a result of our ongoing prudent credit tightening actions, as well as our more diversified product mix. We continue to proactively manage our credit risk to protect our balance sheet and ensure we are appropriately compensated for the risk we take. Moving to Slide 10. Adjusting for the expense impact from our repurchased convertible notes, our 2024 financial outlook remains unchanged from the second quarter of 2024. We continue to expect 2024 average loans to be down low single digits on a percentage basis relative to 2023, based on economic impacts to consumer spending, proactive credit tightening actions, and higher gross credit losses. Total revenue for twenty twenty-four, excluding gains on portfolio sales, is expected to be down low to mid-single digits, with a full year net interest margin lower than twenty twenty-three, reflecting higher reversal of interest and fees due to higher gross credit losses, declining interest rates, and a continued shift in product mix to co-brand and proprietary products. This guidance includes the impact of early CFPB mitigation pricing changes, which are not material to the full year twenty twenty-four guidance. However, specifically for fourth quarter, we expect net interest margin to benefit from our proactive CFPB actions, as well as a lower cash position, offsetting normal seasonal pressures from higher reversals of interest and fees from higher gross credit losses and a typical fourth quarter loan balance increase from more transactional holiday spend. Note that as we remain slightly asset sensitive, we expect net interest margin pressure from lower Fed and prime rates as our variable rate assets reprice faster than our liabilities. As a result of efficiencies gained from our focus on operational excellence, including ongoing investments in technology, modernization, and digital advancement, along with reduced fraud, we expect adjusted expenses, excluding the impact from repurchased convertible notes, to be down mid-single digits relative to 2023. We would expect fourth quarter expenses to be higher than the adjusted third quarter figure, based on seasonally higher sales volumes and further increased marketing expenses. As I mentioned earlier, the third quarter net loss rate is expected to be the low point for the year, and we continue to expect a full year net loss rate in the low 8% range for 2024, or around 8.3%. Given the recent devastation the hurricanes have caused to the communities in which a number of our cardholders live, we have proactively frozen delinquency buckets in FEMA-identified impact zones, designed to provide some near-term payment relief until we have the opportunity to engage them for longer-term solutions as needed. These actions will result in a modest shift of approximately $10 million in losses from the fourth quarter of 2024 to the second quarter of 2025. This will slightly lower the net loss rate in the fourth quarter and increase the net loss rate in the second quarter of 2025. That modest accommodation aside, our outlook continues to assume a gradual, modest improvement in economic conditions aligned with economist consensus. Finally, our full-year normalized effective tax rate is expected to be in the range of 25%-26%, excluding the impacts from our repurchased convertible notes. As expected, the tax deduction allowed on the repurchase premium paid was limited. Looking at the bigger picture, we continue to make meaningful progress toward the financial targets we provided at our Investor Day in June. We are well on our way to achieving our near-term targets, with additional progress made on implementing CFPB mitigation strategies this quarter, a double leverage ratio of 103%, well below our 115% target, a stable risk mix, given our proactive credit actions, and a strong CET1 ratio at 13.3%. We will look to continue to build capital to achieve our capital targets and grow our tangible book value. As Ralph already highlighted, we are well positioned to deliver responsible growth, strong returns, and increased shareholder value. Operator, we are now ready to open up the lines for questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one, one on your telephone keypad now. If you change your mind, please press star followed by one, one again. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your phone is unmuted locally. One moment while we compile the Q&A roster. And our first question comes from Mihir Bhatia with Bank of America. Your line is open. ... Hi, thank you for taking my questions. Maybe to start, I just wanted to get, you know, big picture. Look, you made some comments on losses and expecting seasonality from here, but I think you also mentioned that, you know, you expect your credit actions to get better. So I guess the, you know, big question everyone's trying to answer is, are you close to peak losses right now? And will 2025 losses be better than 2024 losses if the macro stays stable? Mihir, you know, thank you for the question. You know, I think it's really going to come down to the macro environment. It's. You know, we'll give guidance, obviously, in our January call. Right now, what we're seeing is stability in our delinquency. So what I'm expecting is, you know, I'll say, future quarters to follow historical seasonality with some, you know, a little bit of inflation from some of the customer-friendly things we did to support our customers through the hurricanes, and that'll pass through into 2Q. So you get a little bit of noise in there. But the rates, in general, are going to be, I expect to be stable to improving. But it's really gonna come down to the macroeconomic landscape. And you know, that would, you know, encouraging consumer spend, that'll help with our loans. But again, beyond that, I'm expecting slow, gradual improvements in consumer behavior over a prolonged number of quarters. You know, given that these consumers are still trying to dig out from, you know, nearly three years of persistent high inflation, high interest rates on cards, autos, and home loans, and then, you know, that's just gonna take time to unwind. So, you know, there's no fast fix for, you know, I'll say, the typical American household. So it's really gonna come down to, I think, a gradual easing through next year. I mean, that I'd say is our baseline hypothesis, but that is more of, you know, what it is on the macro sentiment. You know, I could give, you know, more views on the economy, but it's really gonna be economically dependent. Got it. Okay. And then just, I guess, as a follow-up, maybe I can just talk about the late fee situation. What I'm trying to understand is what mitigants of yours are already in the market? How much of a benefit are you getting from them right now? And are you like, is the delay gonna help from the standpoint of, you know, if it gets implemented at some point next year, should the headwinds be less because some of the mitigants were in the market already, particularly, I guess, higher interest rates? No, it's an excellent question, right? I mean, so we have been working diligently with our brand partners. You've seen we've put some actions into market already. You know, but what I wanna make sure, you know, it's clear, you know, we do not have an intent to overearn prior to the effective date. You know, our commitment remains to providing our customers, you know, a valuable product to meet their borrowing needs, and then fair economics and investments in our partner programs. We have had very meaningful discussions with our brand partners, with actions that have already been put into market and when, and then with, you know. I'd say we're probably over 95%, have contractual understanding of strategies required to be executed. To your point, in the back end of 2023, we took some early actions where we took some partial steps to increase APRs in anticipation of the rule. Since then, we've implemented a number of changes that are in market, including APR increases and paper statement fees. APR increases just take a lot of time to, I'll say, burn in, to build an effect. And so that's where my comment in the fourth quarter, we'll start to see some of that benefit, but it will offset other seasonal things happening in the quarter. And then as you start to go into next year, some of that will build. And we'll give more color on that here as we get into you know next year. And some of that is shared back with partners. It's again, the goal here is not to overearn. This is an unintended consequence of this, you know, we deem as a flawed CFPB late fee rule. Got it. Okay, Okay, thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Sanjay Sakrani with KBW. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning. Hey, Perry, just to go back on the credit stats. I guess when we look at that second derivative of the year-over-year change in delinquency, that does steadily continue to improve. I guess, based on your comments, do you expect that to just stabilize, you know, as we move forward? I know, there was some comments on, like, the late-stage delinquencies, not necessarily seeing a lot of improvement. Has that changed in any way? I'm just trying to think about, you know, any tightening that you guys would have done and how that sort of impacted the credit metrics. Shouldn't that positively help your credit metrics as we look into next year? Thanks. Yes, Sanjay, a very fair, fair point. The credit actions that we've taken certainly have... I'm sorry, I hear some feedback on the line. Is benefiting our actions. You know, if you think about the stability that we've seen in the delinquency, despite our credit actions over the past couple years, this is still where we're at. Now, I think you've seen, and we've all seen, that our delinquency has probably stabilized more than many peers, and that is a result of the credit actions we've taken. I mean, the economy is still very challenging for the consumers we serve.... But I do believe that a combination of an improving or stabilizing economic outlook, in combination with the effects of our mitigations and the continued credit risk mix from the shifting products a bit away from private label towards other products, co-brand, and proprietary products, will again also aid that continued improvement. But again, I think it's going to be a long road to get back to our through-the-cycle target, but we are fully expecting improvements throughout next year. It's just the degree of improvement is really going to be macro-dependent in combination with the effect of our credit actions. Okay. And then just, did the hurricane actions help the delinquency metrics in September? I'm just curious on that. And then maybe just one more question on the late fees. Sorry, I'm asking the same question as the previous one, questioner asked. Just as far as, like, mitigation, like, when should we expect you to offset all of the impacts from the late fee stuff, assuming, you know, it would have kicked in this year or whatever? I'm just trying to think about the sequencing of those impacts. Thanks. Yeah. So first, the impacts from the hurricane will all start having effect in October. So we'll start to see some of those, you know, impacts on delinquency in October, and, you know, we'll provide that clarity of what the impacts are, because you're going to see some of that really come through in our, you know, our credit quality reporting in our monthly report. So that's when that will go. So I think it'll be more like an October, November impact, and then the losses will impact the quarter, and then it'll also then be detrimental to second quarter next year. So it's, but that's just pure timing. As it relates to the mitigation, you know, there will be a ramping up of benefit leading into when a final rule goes into effect, if it ever does go into effect. A number of the negotiations that we've had with partners and a number of actions we have to take effect basically upon an implementation of the late fee rule. And our guidance has accounted for that we will get back to strong returns, you know, in time. That's in our long-term guidance. The degree to when that is depends upon when the late fee rule goes into effect, and then how far we are into, I'll say, the APR builds and the like, and the continued product shift happening over that period of time as well. But that's not something that happens in a twelve-month window. That's going to... As we've said all along, that takes some years. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Vincent Caintic, with BTIG Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. First one, wanted to talk about your perspective on the fourth quarter, particularly the holiday sales season. You know, what is your perspective on, first, how the consumer's feeling and will be doing, you know, in terms of the holiday sales, and then additionally, in terms of the merchant engagement you're experiencing, perhaps on promotions or other merchant discussions you're having in terms of fourth quarter sales? Thank you. Yeah. Hi, this is Ralph. You know, if I think about it, we've not seen a change in consumer behavior from the second quarter to the third quarter, and I really don't expect a change in consumer behavior in the fourth quarter. I think you'll see consumers self-regulating. There'll be more frequent visits and, you know, probably smaller baskets, but they will be out there. I think our partners are doing what they think they need to do to attract consumers in terms of sales and fair prices. I think that's appropriate. I think it'll be a moderate sales season. I think, given the macroeconomics, a little bit of the uncertainty out there. But I'm not anticipating, you know, a very robust fourth quarter, just probably a fourth quarter that will be in line with the second and third quarter spend that we've seen. Yeah, and I'll add to that. You know, one of the things that you may have read the same is that the National Retail Federation anticipates that the nominal retail sales growth for holiday will be in that 2.5%-3.5% range, lower than recent years, and in part due to the shorter timeframe between Thanksgiving and Christmas, which is only 26 days, which is five days shorter than it was last year. So that's going to possibly put some pressure on the amount of sales that happen in the holiday season. The other thing that we're in this election cycle, that a lot of ads that retailers would normally put on TV are getting squeezed out because of the, you know, the flood of, campaign ads. You know, so again, everything that Ralph said is around the health of the consumer remains stable, but I think these are some other things that will affect industry-wide retail sales. Okay, great. That's very helpful. And yeah, I was thinking about that, that day count as well, so appreciate all that detail. And then second one, for Perry. I appreciate all the guidance on the losses and then the impact from the hurricanes. I was just wondering if you could put a finer point on that. So I think in the past, you know, we were thinking about fourth quarter charge-off rates to the 8.3%. So $10 million benefit would be 20 basis points lower. But then first quarter is typically has a higher charge-off rate, and then you talked about second quarter as well. I don't know if you could maybe help us with the finer numbers in terms of how to think about the fourth quarter versus your prior guidance, and then how to think about the first quarter and then rolling into the second quarter. That'd be super helpful. Thank you. ... Yeah, I think the way you just characterized it, it is right. I mean, we're expecting a seasonal increase in 4Q to low 8% range. And at the fourth quarter, we'll see that $10 million net benefit from the actions that we took to support the customers in the, you know, the hurricane-impacted FEMA zones. But that, that's not sizable enough to impact our full year guidance. I think you've quantified it in the range of what I would have expected. And then going to first quarter, we did comment that there typically is seasonal increases when you go from fourth quarter to first quarter. And the reason why we thought that was important in the past, to make sure we reminded people of that, we actually saw a number of models that had losses going down in the first quarter and didn't want people to be surprised when, you know, it actually does follow some seasonal trends. Now, there's lots of credit actions out there. We're taking, you know, doing things that will hopefully, you know, mute some of what maybe historical, rise has been, but there is going to be an expected increase. And then, you know, things should then follow some seasonality from there, as well as, you know, then it's macro and credit action, dependent upon how much it can improve beyond that point, adjusted beyond, you know, for that than the ten million hitting into the second quarter. But take that aside, that's the best I can give you at this point. We'll obviously put a finer point on that as we get closer to it, and we'll give you the January guidance in January. Okay, great. That's very helpful. Thanks so much. You bet. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeffrey Adelson from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, Perry and Ralph. Good morning. Morning. Perry, you talked about the, you know, the persistent impact of higher prices and, you know, you now have real wage growth here. But you've highlighted, you know, that dynamic as a part of a reason why, you know, your late stage roll rates have been more elevated. I was wondering if you could just maybe give us a quick update on how the late stage dynamic has been evolving. And, I guess, as we think about the rest of twenty twenty-five, you know, should the seasonality cadence for charge-offs be similar to delinquencies, or is there any sort of dynamic in the roll rates that might be impacting that seasonality? Yeah. So great question. Let me give you a little bit on the thought on the economy, because I think this is an important point. As you know, we have seen some stable signs and stable economy with some signs of improvement. So you would expect that to start to assist some of the roll rates and delinquency. Like, we're seeing, you know, improvements in early stage delinquency. You know, if things play out better, then that should improve. But it is too early to declare victory right now in the economy and inflation. I think that's something the Fed acknowledged themselves. So, you know, we still see areas of concern regarding the consumer and the economy overall. Inflation still remains above the Fed 2% target, and there's especially true for stickier categories like shelter, medical and insurance, all still above 4%. And so that it still concerns us with the, I'll say, the general consumer. And, you know, this has been a problem. If you think about small business sentiment, they're pessimistic about the future, which means it brings into question their ability to grow, invest and hire, and that can affect employment down the road. Household debt is still very high, well above pre-COVID levels. And you think about what higher rates have done to mortgages, auto loans, credit card, personal loans, all that's eroded spending power, and, that's increasing their monthly costs. So what this has done is create an affordability gap. So you think about who we serve, you know, and it's lower middle-income Americans. So while the top, I'll say 20%-30% of Americans, you know, this, the higher inflation, this environment is, I'll say, a nuisance, but these people are still driving the broader economy, and they're not showing a lot of signs of stress. There's sure some delinquencies creeping up the prime ladder when you look at other issuers. But, you know, it doesn't tell the issue for two-thirds of Americans who are still struggling to balance their budget. But all that said, those are our concerns, but we are seeing that those encouraging signs that more positive trends could materialize, right? And that's the piece of this where we're encouraged that, okay, this quarter, wage growth did outpace inflation. That should start to help the two-thirds of the customers that we talk about, who have been, say, struggling the most with this, and so inflation is moving towards the Fed's 2% target, and that obviously results in a 50 basis point cut. People are expecting some more cuts throughout the end of this year and the next year. That should be good for employment. Again, employment, labor, unemployment is low. So if everything is trending well, and it's definitely showing its signs, but the bottom line is the cumulative impact of what has happened over the past three years in the economy has not proven sufficient yet for many of our customers to fully, I'll say, adjust to this higher bit of inflation. So any amount of unemployment tick-ups and a re-tick-up in inflation for some reason depends on what happens with, you know, the elected administration, you know, could create some strain. So we're, I'll say, cautiously optimistic for twenty twenty-five and really encouraged that the debate and sentiment, you know, with economists and others have gone from, is it a recession or soft landing? It's really shifted to a soft landing or no landing. And if that's the case, that should bode well for our consumers and start to help with those back end roll rates. And that's really what we're looking for. The front end looks good. It's the back end we want to see some relief into. ... Okay, and as my follow-up, you know, as we think about the forward curve here, your asset sensitivity, how should we also quantify the impact to your gross card yields from what could be a higher level of charge-offs into twenty twenty-five? And when do you think those reversals could start to be a good guy? If, again, not giving a guide for 2025, but if the loss rate comes down next year, that should also precipitate a good upside into net interest margin as a result of that. Now, if interest rates continue to come down, meaning the Fed cuts, and we are slightly asset sensitive, that will mute the benefit from lower gross losses. Okay, thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Our next question comes from Bill Carcache with Wolfe Research. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning, Ralph and Perry. I wanted to start off with a high-level question. When we look across the broader universe of companies extending consumer credit, you guys have relatively higher exposure to customers with lower credit scores than many, as you've described, but you don't seem to be experiencing the same credit headwinds. Could you discuss why you think that is, particularly since all lenders are essentially, you know, sharing the same population of customers? Yeah, I think it's a combination of things. One, we saw the strain early. When you think about the K economy we've talked about in the past, that's one reason. So yes, we have a shared universe of customers, but when we tilt a little higher risk, our customers felt that risk earlier. They used up their pandemic-level savings faster. And at the same time, I'll say two other big reasons is, you know, we understood what the period of elevated inflation was going to mean to our customers. We took credit actions early, and we continued to take actions through from the time we sensed this was going to happen a couple of years ago, and at the same time, through those credit actions, and you know the narrative from other issuers, we didn't expand our buy box. You have not heard us talk about, oh, the 2022 vintages or 2023 vintages. It's seasoning. They're larger vintages than they should have been, and now we're feeling the pain from that. So I think that's some of the reasons when you go look at loss rate changes year-over-year, ours is on the low end of that compared to many other peers. And that's a credit to our our credit risk team and the disciplined management that we have in place. That's helpful, Perry, thank you. And, if I could follow up on credit. You made it clear you expect your loss rates to drift very gradually towards your longer term through the cycle targets from here, but could you parse out for us, you know, how to sort of think about, you know, frequency and severity dynamics from here? You know, I think, yeah, you discussed these dynamics a little bit in an earlier response, but, you know, I think if the macro sort of plays out in that soft landing, under that soft landing scenario, should we start to see some cure rates, as we move into twenty twenty-five, sort of lead to the back end, you know, the later stage of delinquency improvements and ultimately lower loss rates and, and all of that sort of being supportive to ultimately the reserve rate being able to drift lower at some point in twenty-five? Yeah, I think all of what you just said is fair. It's all macro-dependent. I mean, granted, we are taking credit actions, and we're building a book with a little better credit risk mix in there, but much of that back-end improvement is going to be based on the health of the consumer. Are they getting relief from wage growth outpacing inflation? You know, so that's going to be the key, and I don't have, I'll say, a ton of confidence based on what I've heard from policies from either party right now, what might happen to inflation, and will it really be a march down, or are there going to be some things that might, you know, drive it back up? So I'm cautious, but your thesis is fair, that if things stay stable and things keep, you know, improving, I expect back-end roll rates to modestly improve throughout the year. It's just, I don't see a cliff event where something's going to happen, and as I said earlier, a fast fix. But again, I'll be cautiously optimistic with that. And, you know, then, it, you know, specific to... If you want me to speak about the reserve rate a little bit, I can, because I think you were trying to dovetail that into, you're trying to isolate onto, what might loss rates look like. And then to your point, definitely, pairs with what would happen with the reserve rate. You know, I think you've seen, you know, the reserve rate today at 12.2 remain in the range of where we've been over the past seven quarters. I expect the reserve rate to be near the current rate until we see evidence of both continued improved credit quality, which means the back-end roll rates a little bit, that they decline over time and an improved economic outlook, both in the baseline and the stress scenario. You know, I think right now that we feel confident about the guide I've given for fourth quarter, that the reserve rate will be, I'll say, slightly down to possibly flat, and that's possibly flat is really going to be dependent on if there's any change in the those baseline and S3, S4 scenarios that we run. But outside of that, you know, we'll see where we go. But this is going to be. You know, I'd say this is, as we become more confident in a soft or no landing scenario in the coming quarters, I'd expect you know, slowly shift the weightings that we have in our CECL models to a less adverse posture, and then that would allow the reserve rate to drift down. So, you know, I think that's something to you know, we'll continue to watch, but as of right now, those scenarios really didn't change much from, you know, say, June of this year to what we just were running. So it's going to be very important to watch what those outlooks do in the fourth quarter, and that's, you know, 60, 90 days from now. I want to make sure that what I said was right, that the fourth quarter of this year will be down versus last year. Fourth quarter, seasonally, it'll come down, and then obviously goes back up in the first quarter seasonally. Understood. That's very clear. Thank you for taking my questions. You bet. Thank you. Our next question comes from David Rochester with Compass Point Research & Trading. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, guys. Good morning. Good morning. On expenses, you mentioned those would be higher in Q4, and when I look at the expense guide, it seems to imply a pretty sizable step up quarter-over-quarter, just to get to the more favorable end of that guidance range. Can you just possibly narrow down that range of an increase you're expecting in the fourth quarter? And I guess that's all coming from higher marketing and sales volume pickup. Is that right? Yeah, that is correct. I mean, you go back and look at the past, you know, couple of years, and you'll see the step up from third quarter to fourth quarter, and that's probably your best guide in terms of what to expect in the fourth quarter of this year. Okay, and on the margin, I appreciated all the comments you made on all the forces at work there in the fourth quarter, the supports and the pressures. Is the net of all that still a net negative? Are you still expecting margin pressure, or could the mitigants rolling in be enough to drive some stability there, or maybe even some upside in the fourth quarter? Thanks. Yeah, I wouldn't say upside in the fourth quarter. I think there's a lot of moving parts, and it's some of it is, I'll say, yet to be seen. Some of it is, you know, the consumer behavior in the quarter. What is, I'll say, loan growth look like with transactors? We've got Fed cuts that are still going to, you know, possibly come through. So, there's just a lot of variables. But the reason why we wanted to share the commentary we did is that typically you see a seasonal decrease in net interest margin of, I'll say, a substantial amount. Here, we're saying that our mitigation actions that we put in place to offset some of the CFPB late fee rule is going to mute some of that. Okay, so, so definitely no expansion, but potentially not much in the way of compression. Not as much, correct. Great. All right. Thanks, guys. You're welcome. Thank you. Our next question comes John Pancari with Evercore ISI Your line is open. Morning. Perry, you had indicated that you expect the loss trajectory to begin to reflect more of your normal seasonality here. How would you define that normal seasonality? And specifically, when we look at first quarter 2025, I believe you're looking at it, maybe your historical seasonal increase may have been around seventy basis points. So could that put your first quarter 2025 loss rate above 9%? So what I had suggested was that you guys look at their seasonal movement. I'm not giving specific guidance on this, but it was just that, as I mentioned earlier, analysts had reflected a decrease. So the exact opposite of what seasonal movement would naturally do. So again, I'd say we're taking great credit actions. The team's doing a terrific job with collections. It's just whether we're hoping to do better than normal seasonal movement, I just wanted to be sure that there's a recognition that there is seasonal movement, and it will be macro-dependent and collection effectiveness-dependent and the like. Okay. All right. Thanks for that. And then separately, I know you've flagged a few times on this call the expected impact of the storms. Just out of curiosity, how much of Bread's cardholder base is in Florida, in the storm-impacted areas? I want to say it's about 5% of our population are in the impacted areas. And again, it's more than Florida, right? It was up into the Carolinas. I think FEMA had some counties maybe in Atlanta. Again, we just followed the FEMA zones that were impacted. So between North Carolina, Florida, it's probably in that 4%-5% range of customers. Okay. Got it. Got it. And if I could ask just one last quick one. It was on an earlier question. I think Mihir's question around the mitigation impact. Just to confirm, did you indicate that it was not a material impact to your full year twenty-four guide, and therefore, should we assume not a material impact to this quarter or next in terms of the mitigation benefits? Correct in that it was not material to 2024, not material in third quarter, but with mitigation, it starts to build and ramp and I'll say, wedge out. And so what I did say, it will be slightly positive for fourth quarter, which is helping to offset some of the normal seasonal NIM compression that you would have ordinarily seen. It will not be as pronounced because of some of the CFPB positive mitigation that will be there. And then that will further build into each quarter, subsequently going into 2025. Got it. Okay, great. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Our next question comes from Reggie Smith with JPM. Your line is open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question. It's probably a really easy answer to this, but could you remind us of the calculus you guys did internally when deciding to redeem those converts, which have a fairly low coupon rate, and how you thought about that versus, you know, paying down more expensive debt or you want to buy them back? So I'm going to have a few follow-ups. Reggie, I had a little bit of a hard time hearing you, but I think if I heard you correctly, and tell me if I got it right, you're asking for the calculus on the decision to repurchase some of the convertible debt versus other actions. Did I get that right? Okay, I'm going to- Yes. Okay, good. That's it. Yeah. Yeah, so, you know, when we took on the convertible, you know, almost not quite eighteen months ago, you know, we certainly, you know, did so out of necessity at the time. And for us, we've had a debt plan to, you know, pay down our parent debt and continue to improve our capital stack. And we've made tremendous progress since last year. Our team has just been really focused on it, strengthening the balance sheet. You know, we got rated for the first time, you know, last November of 2023. We opportunistically then went right out and issued a $600 million senior unsecured notes offering in December of 2023, got upsized to $900 million in January. And then we paid down over $500 million of parent debt during that period, and we've got an additional, then we did an additional $100 million in the first quarter. So we've been really focused on this, and, you know, it paid off the company's bank term loan. And then this repurchasing of $262 million of our convertible, again, it's just a continuation of our philosophy in trying to improve the parent-level debt situation. As we commented, our, you know, double leverage ratio is down to 103%, where it was at 184% at just year-end 2022. So we looked at it as a good thing to do. I mean, you saw the numbers we put out there during our investor day, and what we believe the opportunity, you know, I'll say for tangible book value accretion, is over the years to come. You know, with this action, it allowed us to further delever, which is consistent with our capital priorities, and it de-risked future dilution associated with these convertibles as our share price is expected to move, I'll say, substantially higher in the future. You know, we said it in investor day. We believe our shares should be trading a multiple tangible book value. You have seen it, where we went from trading at a pretty substantial discount to where we're close to tangible book value in just the past year. And so as the macro environment improves and we demonstrate we can successfully navigate a challenging time, we expect continued, you know, share price appreciation along with our responsible growth and achieving our, our return commitments. And, you know, when we, when we do that, you know, it would get- it could get pretty expensive to repurchase the convertible at a, at a future time. So for us, we were able to, delever and take out what I'll call, a future price risk by doing it early. Got it. Now I understand. And then, I guess thinking about the mitigation stuff, I know with the APRs, the APR increases, I believe, only apply to, like, new purchases. I was curious, I know there's a bleed-in period there, but mechanically, when people pay back their balances, it pays off those higher APR balances first. Is that how that works? Part one of the question. Part two is, when you're talking about the fourth quarter impact, is it safe to assume that most of that benefit is coming from the statement fees? And I'm not sure if you guys have articulated what those, the range of those fees could be. So anything you could share on that would be great. Thank you. You bet. You are correct. Card Act has, you know, prevailing rules around, payment allocation, and typically it is, you know, anything above min pay has to go against, the highest, APR balance first, which is why it takes so long for the, you know, the higher APRs to have an effect. Now, that said, every new account booked, you know, throughout the year or from whatever point you have those rates in market, are 100% at the higher rate. So that also helps to build as the new vintages come on, you know, each quarter, that'll continue to be a building benefit. Specific to fourth quarter, it was, you know, because the balance has been building with some of the higher rates and some of the new accounts coming on, with some of the waves of APR increases that went out in the second quarter, you start to see that benefit really come through, a bit more in the fourth quarter. Specific to statement fees, that would not affect net interest margin. That would be in non-interest income. ... Got it. Okay. Okay, perfect. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Our next question comes from John Arfstrom with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Good morning. Just, yeah, want to get out of the P&L for a second here, and in your guidance, you talk about visibility into your pipelines. Can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing in the pipelines? And then, Ralph, you've been pretty quiet. Perry's been kind of beat up, but can you maybe talk about new business activity, new business win potential for the company, and what you're seeing right now? Yeah, no, I prefer, I, I prefer you beat up Perry. So, listen, our pipeline has always been strong, and it continues to be strong. I mean, what... You know, we announced a couple of things today. Certainly, we've talked about Saks, which we're thrilled about, and then starting a de novo program with Hard Rock, which again, we're thrilled about. If you think about. If you look at our portfolio in general, you know, the renewals are strong. 90% of our book is good through 2025, the end of 2025. 80% is good to the end of 2026. The majority of our top ten programs, the overwhelming majority of our top ten programs, are good to the end of the decade, so we feel really good about that. What I love about our pipeline is you could do things like Hard Rock, which is de novo, are starting out, and then you can compete for portfolios like Saks out there, which are really good portfolios. That continues to be where we are. I do, you know, certainly credit our business development team. They have a good reputation in the marketplace. They're well respected, and we are really focusing our product set against, you know, co-brand and private label and all the verticals out there. As I said, you know, we are no longer dependent on one vertical or mall-based or soft goods. We have a diversified portfolio and diversified product set that really sets us up well for success. Okay. Thank you. That's all I have. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'll now pass it back to Ralph Andretta for closing comments. Listen, thank you all for joining the call today and your continued interest in Bread Financial, and we look forward to speaking with you on the next quarter. Everybody have a terrific day, and thanks again for your time. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.