Good morning, and welcome to The Bunge Global SA Fourth Quarter 2023 Earnings Release and Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would like now to turn the conference over to Ruth Ann Wisener. Please go ahead. Thank you, Maria, and thank you for joining us this morning for our fourth quarter earnings call. Before we get started, I want to let you know that we have slides to accompany our discussion. These can be found in the Investor Center on our website at bunge.com under Events and Presentations. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are posted on our website as well. I'd like to direct you to slide two and remind you that today's presentation includes forward-looking statements that reflect Bunge's current view with respect to future events, financial performance, and industry conditions. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Bunge has provided additional information in its reports on file with the SEC concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in this presentation, and we encourage you to review these factors. On the call this morning are Greg Heckman, Bunge's Chief Executive Officer, and John Neppl, Chief Financial Officer. I'll now turn the call over to Greg. Thank you, Ruth Ann, and good morning, everyone. 2023 was a significant year for Bunge, with both our continued strong financial performance and progress on our long-term strategy. I wanna thank the team for their exceptional execution on our day-to-day business, while also focusing on key projects for the future. First and foremost, we announced our pending combination with Viterra to create a premier agribusiness solutions company. We received overwhelming shareholder approval, and our team's been hard at work planning for a successful integration when we close the transaction, which we expect to occur later this year. We continue engaging with relevant authorities in countries around the world as we make progress on regulatory approvals. In addition to the Viterra transaction, we announced the planned acquisition of CJ Selecta, a leading fully integrated manufacturer and exporter of soy-based products in Brazil. We broke ground on our soy protein concentrate plant in Morristown, Indiana, with construction on track for a 2025 commissioning. We also completed the acquisition of a state-of-the-art oil refinery in Avondale, Louisiana. This facility, which has multi-oil capabilities, builds on our ability to provide value-added oils to our food customers in North America and is already exceeding our initial performance expectations. In the next few months, we'll be commissioning our new multi-oil refining and packaging plant in India. These growth initiatives will enable us to meet rising demand for plant-based food and feed ingredients. Investments to enhance our existing footprint are also paying off in improved overall performance. Our team continued to execute on planned capital projects, which, when combined with our focus on operational excellence, enabled us to reduce oilseed processing unplanned downtime to a historic low. Making better use of our capacity directly hits the bottom line. These investments were also made with an eye towards advancing our work in sustainability. Running our plants more efficiently improves our performance against our science based targets, and we're committed to continuous improvement of our operations while expanding regenerative agricultural programs and engaging with the industry to do our part to reduce carbon emissions across the entire supply chain. We're proud of our team's many accomplishments in 2023, a year in which Bunge was selected to be part of the S&P 500, a landmark moment for our company and reflective of the work we've accomplished to transform our business over the last several years. Looking at the fourth quarter specifically, we delivered strong Adjusted EBIT, driven by record results in processing and improved results in milling. During the quarter, we continued to return capital to shareholders through stock repurchases and dividends. Looking ahead, as we've been reminded over the past few years, the only constant is change. Each year brings its own set of challenges and opportunities, and the team has shown we can navigate with agility and speed. Based on the current margin environment and forward curves, the market dynamic in 2024 looks to be different than what we experienced in 2023. And, as is often the case, forward visibility is limited at this point in the year. For the full year, we expect to generate Adjusted EPS of approximately $9. John will go through our forecast in more detail. I wanna reiterate that the work we've done to transform Bunge has created a company better equipped to operate in any market environment. With the combination of Bunge and Viterra, we'll continue to improve our global platform, making it more efficient and resilient, allowing us to better serve our customers at both ends of the value chain.... I'll hand the call over to John now to walk through our financial results and outlook in more detail, and I'll then close with some additional thoughts. John? Thanks, Greg, and good morning, everyone. Let's turn to the earnings highlights on slide five. Our reported fourth quarter earnings per share was $4.18, compared to $2.21 in the fourth quarter of 2022. Our reported results included a positive mark-to-market timing difference of $1.08 per share and a negative impact of $0.60 per share, primarily related to acquisition and integration costs associated with our announced business combination with Viterra, as well as a fixed asset impairment charge. Adjusted EPS was $3.70 in the fourth quarter versus $3.24 in the prior year. Full year 2023 earnings per share was $14.87 versus $10.51 in 2022. Adjusted full-year EPS was $13.66 versus a record $13.91 in the prior year. Adjusted core segment earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT, was $881 million in the quarter versus $804 million last year. Agribusiness had a strong close to the year. Processing results in the quarter were up $132 million, primarily related to South America, Europe, and Canada, more than offsetting lower results in the U.S., which had a difficult comparison to a particularly strong prior year. Results in Asia were comparable to last year. In merchandising, results in the quarter were down in all businesses, reflecting lower volatility. Refined and specialty oils finished a record year with strong fourth quarter results of $212 million. Performance for the quarter was down slightly from last year, as higher results in North and South America were more than offset by lower results in Europe and Asia. In milling, improved results in the quarter were primarily driven by our South American operations, reflecting higher margins due to the combination of lower wheat costs and a more favorable pricing environment. Results in U.S. corn milling also improved. Corporate and other improved from last year. Higher corporate expenses related to investments and growth initiatives were more than offset by positive results in our captive insurance program and Bunge Ventures. In our non-core sugar and bioenergy joint venture, results were lower as higher sugar prices were more than offset by lower ethanol prices. For the quarter, reported income tax expense was $219 million, compared to $131 million for the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher pre-tax income and geographic earnings mix. Adjusting for notable items and mark-to-market timing differences, the full year adjusted effective income tax rate was 23%, compared to 17% for the prior year. Net interest expense of $115 million in the quarter was up compared to last year, primarily due to higher interest rates. Also impacting the quarter were foreign currency borrowings in certain countries where interest rates were high. However, the incrementally higher borrowing costs were offset with currency hedges reported within EBIT. Let's turn to slide six, where you can see our EPS and EBIT trends, adjusted for notable items and timing differences over the past five years. The strong performance reflects our team's continued excellent execution in a favorable operating environment, while also delivering on a variety of initiatives to position the company for long-term growth. Slide seven details our capital allocation. In 2023, we generated approximately $2.5 billion of adjusted funds from operations, which was up by approximately $110 million versus 2022's record performance. After allocating $488 million to sustaining CapEx, which include maintenance, environmental, health, and safety, we had approximately $2 billion of discretionary cash flow available. Of this amount, we paid $383 million in common dividends, invested $634 million in growth and productivity-related CapEx, which is up significantly from $249 million last year, and repurchased $600 million of Bunge shares, leaving $361 million of retained cash flow for the year. Moving to slide eight, we finished 2023 with a total CapEx spend of approximately $1.1 billion and expect to invest $1.2 billion-$1.4 billion in 2024. Our sustaining CapEx has been higher, reflecting post-pandemic catch-up and increased investments in operational and reliability, where we're already seeing the benefits through reduced unplanned downtime. Also, our discretionary spend is up due to executing on our pipeline and growth projects, many of which are multi-year investments. We expect continued elevated spend in 2025 as we complete these projects. As shown in slide nine, at year-end, readily marketable inventory, or RMI, exceeded our net debt by approximately $3.5 billion. This reflects our use of retained cash flow to fund working capital while reducing debt. Our adjusted leverage ratio, which reflects our adjusted net debt to adjusted EBITDA, was 0.2x at the end of the fourth quarter. Slide 10 highlights our liquidity position. At year-end, all $5.7 billion of our committed credit facilities was unused and available. This provides us ample liquidity to manage our ongoing capital needs. Please turn to slide 11. For the trailing twelve months, adjusted ROIC was 18.4%, well above our RMI-adjusted weighted average cost of capital of 7.7%. ROIC was 14.3%, also well above our weighted average cost of capital of 7%. Moving to Slide 12. For the trailing twelve months, we produced discretionary cash flow of approximately $2 billion and a cash flow yield of 18.2%. Please turn to Slide 13 in our 2024 outlook. As Greg mentioned in his remarks, taking into account the current margin environment and forward curves, we expect full year 2024 adjusted EPS of approximately $9. Note that this forecast excludes any pending acquisitions that are expected to close during the year. In agribusiness, full year results are forecasted to be down from last year's record performance, primarily due to lower results in processing, where margins have compressed in most regions. Results in merchandising are forecasted to be down slightly from last year. In refined and specialty oils, full year results are expected to be down from the record prior year, reflecting an environment of increased supply, particularly in the U.S. In milling, full year results are expected to be up from last year, and in corporate and other, full year results are also expected to be up from last year. In non-core, full year results in our sugar and bioenergy joint venture are expected to be down considerably from last year, reflecting lower Brazilian ethanol prices. Additionally, the company expects the following for 2024: an adjusted annual effective tax rate in the range of 21%-25%, net interest expense in the range of $300 million-$330 million, capital expenditures in the range of $1.2 billion-$1.4 billion, and depreciation and amortization of approximately $450 million. With that, I'll turn things back over to Greg for some closing comments. Thanks, John. Before turning to Q&A, I want to offer a few closing thoughts. So we're proud of the work we've done to optimize our business, and we're always looking for ways to drive continuous improvement. We've got a clear set of priorities, continue that work in 2024, and we're confident that we'll end the year as an even stronger Bunge. We're making great progress towards closing our combination with Viterra, which will increase diversification across assets, geographies, and crops, providing us with more optionality and capability to serve customers. And we continue to invest in our people and global infrastructure. Through effective training and proper tools, we can safely and reliably meet our customers' needs. We're also working on a number of initiatives to best equip our team for the future, including strengthening our digital capabilities. We're making these investments to meet the longer-term demand growth for our products and services. And while always looking for opportunities to improve, we are well positioned to deliver on our critical mission of connecting farmers to consumers to deliver essential food, feed, and fuel to the world. And with that, we'll turn to Q&A. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question is from Ben Bienvenu of Stephens. Please go ahead. Good morning, everybody. Good morning, Ben. So over the last several years, there's clearly been building tailwinds for the business. You've capitalized on it very nicely. As we get to this point in the cycle, some of those tailwinds certainly moderate, as expressed in your guidance. And you noted, Greg, that, you know, as usual, but particularly now, there's maybe a little bit less visibility into the business looking forward. If you can think through your business segments, can you help us understand where you feel like you have the most visibility versus the least, and some of the key things that you're focused on to maybe gain greater visibility for the year as we move through the year? Yeah, sure. Thanks, Ben. I think, you know, as usual, the first quarter is where we have the most visibility, and then it starts to kind of reduce as we go out. Having the global platform, of course, is very helpful. And so as we look across crush today, and you know, as we've said, and we look at the curves and what they give us, they're all inverted with some pretty limited liquidity beyond Q1. And then we're in that, what we do have visibility to, and you kind of think about history, we're in that transition as markets get a little more balanced on supply and demand, that producers generally don't like selling lower prices, and they've got room to storage. So you see a little bit generally reluctant selling as we transition from the farmer. And then the end consumer, we see them having, you know, an incentive to wait, so they're becoming also more short purchased and buying in the spot as prices are balancing and the supply chain is not quite as tight. So those are some of the key things that we're watching that, of course, affect both crush and merch and our refined and special oil and milling all together. Okay, very good. My second question is related to, you know, a similar dynamic as we kind of have shifting winds in the cycle. You know, operationally, organizationally, tactically, you all have positioned the business to maximize earnings power as the cycle was accelerating to the upside over the last number of years. Externally, you, you've done a masterful job of managing expectations, and I think your track record of guiding conservatively is well established at this point. As we get to a slightly different backdrop, how does your focus internally change, if at all? How do the changes that you've made historically position you to also maximize earnings power as we see more balanced supply-demand? How, if at all, does your external expectation management change in this sort of environment, if at all, versus what we've seen in the last several years? Well, I just would start by saying, you know, the same things that we've been focused on really work in all environments. And I think we talked as we were going, we were always thinking about trying to build the company for the bottom of the cycle, which, you know, you hope you never experience. But if we have that mindset, and we have our costs in position to be the most efficient, regardless of where you are in the cycle, that we have our business organized in our operating model to have the most nimble and agile and ability to react to whatever the external factors that we can't control in the market. That we ensure that we have got our reward systems in alignment with our stakeholders and with our investors, and with our customers at both ends of the value chain, that we're kind of—we're gonna operate the same on the things that we can control. You know, I think we talked about it in the past. This—you got to continue to think about it. This is a big feed, food, and fuel in global infrastructure, right? To serve our customer. We still have the billions of dollars of assets. We still got the tens of thousands of customers. We've still got the millions of tons of physical flows, and that's the embedded optionality that exists. So while we don't control the markets, we do control how we manage day-to-day. We stay focused on what we can control, and then unlock that value as we're helping balance supply and demand across our businesses for our customers at both ends of the value chain. That's just kind of a maniacal focus every day. Okay, great. Thanks so much. Thanks for taking my questions. Thanks, Ben. The next question is from Manav Gupta with UBS. Good morning, guys. Congrats on a very strong quarter. You came in well ahead of expectations, so congrats on that. My question here is- It's more of a help if you could provide. You have a $9 guidance for 2024, which we think is conservative. But help us understand, if Viterra does close on, let's say, July 1, then where could this $9 go based on the current environment? Whatever help you could provide would be highly appreciated. Sure, Manav, this is John. I think, you know, what we've communicated in the past, I think our view is on Viterra close, you know, in 2024 will be, you know, mildly accretive to flat. In the first year, we've got, you know, a lot of synergy costs, a lot of integration costs to incur. And certainly for the first six-12 months, you know, there'll be a lot of work around integration and focus on that. I think we love the business, and I think the long term is outstanding, especially when you look at environment like we're going into. But I wouldn't expect a significant impact on the $9 in this year. And I might add, the one thing that we have, you know, spoken about is how the businesses are so different with us being much stronger in the processing and they're much stronger on the origination, storage, handling, and distribution. So if you do have a market that moves more into a contango or a carry, that does benefit where you have more storage. So I think that when we talk about the diversification in the crops we handle and in the asset footprints and the geographies, that would be one of the things that we'd be thinking about, depending on when we close and what the environment looks at when we talk about the outlook at those times. Thank you. My quick follow-up here is: It looks like the discretionary CapEx for 2024 is going- Probably going to be somewhere between $720 million-$840 million. Help us understand where this money is being spent, the kind of returns, and when do we start seeing these projects come online, so we can start giving you the benefit of earnings associated with this CapEx? Thank you. Sure. Yeah, so we, we embarked, really last year and the year before on some pretty large, multi-year projects. And most of those things, like our, our build-out with our Chevron joint venture, our plant in, in Rotterdam, in Amsterdam, our, our new oils plant, our, specialty proteins plant in, in Indiana, all those things are, our plant in India. All of those things are, have been multi-year. While India's coming on, later this year, most of those are still gonna be in build-out phase through 2025. So we really expect them to start contributing in 2026. And we target a mid-teens return on average on most of our projects. Some could be a little lower, some could be higher. So that's the CapEx side, and then certainly on the M&A with, you know, as we announced CJ Selecta, that we're hoping to close later this year. That one. You know, beauty of that one is it'll be immediately accretive when we get that one executed and closed. But I wouldn't expect, you know, too much contribution in 2025 on those, because they're really gonna be coming online late in the year, and it takes a little bit of time for commissioning. So most of those will start contributing in 2026. And then on the M&A side, you know, we continue to look at a lot of smaller opportunities. You know, not anything of the magnitude of a Viterra or a CJ Selecta necessarily, but there's a lot of smaller bolt-on opportunities that we're working as well, that we'll keep you updated on. Thank you so much. The next question is from Ben Theurer with Barclays. Hey, good morning, John, Greg. As well, congrats from my side. Thank you. Just wanted to follow up. So one actually associated a little bit with the M&A and the contribution of it, capital allocation in general. Can you just maybe frame to the audience how you think about the buybacks left over for the Viterra deal? Because if I remember right, you said you wanted to have done about half of it, of the $2 billion that was announced until the close. So that would leave you with, I guess, some roundabout $400 million. Just that we can think about, is that something you target for in the first half? And then aside from it, with that contribution, and you've laid it out nicely right now on the 2026 and the returns, etc. If we would have to go back to somewhere like the mid-cycle EPS framework, I remember, a few quarters ago, you, you've laid this out, and I think you said back then, like $8.50 on a base business, but with all the, buybacks and accretions and projects and M&A, et cetera, it was more like a $10 and $11. Is that—Does that still hold, even if we're thinking about an around $9 for 2024, if we—if these projects would be around? Sure. So we'll start with share buyback, and the $400 million, I think our expectation right now is we will execute that in the first half of the year. And, you know, we've committed to doing at least that $400 million by close of the transaction, so we expect to do that. And then we'll see from there as we go forward. With respect to our outlook for 2026 and the $11, I think we still feel very positive with that and right on track. While the CapEx has maybe been delayed a little bit from a timing standpoint, you know, we got a little bit of a late start on some of these, as costs went up, and we went back and took a look at projects. We've actually picked up pace on the M&A side a little bit, so we feel very good about our trajectory against that $11+ by 2026, and have no reason to change it at this point. Okay, perfect. And then quick follow-up: As we think about the guidance for this year and maybe the magnitude of changes that you're foreseeing right now, I know, and Ben brought this up early on about the visibility, and I know about the challenges 2Q onwards. But as you look at it today, where do you think the biggest downside versus 2023 is within, call it maybe the key four, processing, merchandising, and refined and specialty oils? I think if you look at the big flags, the big put and takes that we're thinking about it, you know, at the highest level, of course, the geopolitically and weather, right? And so while we're getting a more balanced S&D situation globally, we're kind of, you know, one weather event from really tightening things up, and that could bring some volatility back. And then the other offset is around at a high level, you think about demand. And so, you know, lower prices should spur more demand. That's what we've seen historically, and then it's really, you know, how quickly we see that. Even if you take an anecdote on the food side, we're seeing all of our food customers' innovation projects, which had spent the last two years being cost reduction-type programs, are now really focused on growth. So product development, new products, and line extensions. And then you take the kind of under that umbrella, some of the big drivers, of course, it's the veg oil, S&D in North America, because as we saw it play out in 2023 and it will continue in 2024, you know, we've got a new industry with new demand building. The market's doing its work, supply is adjusting, and it can be pretty sensitive to that oil pipeline, veg oil prices in North America, which, of course, is really sensitive to the crush margins in North America. And, you know, the other, of course, is Argentina, where you've got a weather situation there, much better than last year, where bean production should maybe be double what last year was. And you've got a new government in place, and so how their policies and incentives play out, I think that's a big one to watch. Then, of course, you always have got to think about China, not only their economy and how it, you know, develops the macro, just from an overall demand, and then, of course, how they think about stocks building. I think those are the kind of big flags that we think about. Right now, if you look at the curves and the outlook, people aren't predicting much disruption at this point. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thanks, Ben. The next question is from Adam Samuelson with Goldman Sachs. Yeah, thank you. Good morning, everyone. Yeah, Adam, morning. Hi. So maybe, continuing along that kind of line of questioning, as we think about kind of the approximately $9 EPS, it would seem to imply, give or take, $1 billion of pro-segment profit reduction on a year-on-year basis. And just helping, can you help dimensionalize the segments where that's coming? Presumably, merchandising, processing is the largest contributor, but at least frame kind of what kind of year-on-year decline you're currently kind of thinking about for refined specialty oils, sugar, just to help put the decline in processing in better context. Then I got a follow-up. Yeah, Adam, this is John. I think there are really three big drivers to the year-over-year change, and the largest is what we're assuming on the processing side, certainly globally. You know, that's probably, I'd say, close to 80% of the variance. When you look at the gross variance, we have some things that are going to be up, we expect to be up, but that's a big piece of it. And then the other big drivers are, so refined, specialty oils being down, you know, from probably $200 million from where we finished this year in 2024. And then the other one is sugar. We're calling down, you know, given ethanol and prices and environment in Brazil. But then we have some other things going the other direction to ultimately get to the change. But certainly the largest is the processing segment at this point. Okay, that's helpful. So, I mean, within that processing, if it's 80% or so, that implies something, what, a $70-$80, sorry, $15-$20 a ton lower kind of global crush margin decline- On your footprint. Can you help frame kind of regions where that is kind of a larger kind of headwind versus not, and how more North America crush and soy meal and the return of Argentina to the export market in the second quarter kind of is factoring into your kind of the regional balance of your network? Yeah, I could... You want me to- Yeah, let me start. I'll start on that. Yeah, so if you think about, and maybe back into it from soft seeds, we still expect those to be strong, but kind of down slightly. You know, they'll be off some from 2023, but should still be good in both Europe and North America. But soy is really the one, as you've called out. So I think everything will be softer, if you look at the regions, except Argentina, which Argentina was a drag last year to everything, and we had to cover it with the global system. So now you'll see Argentina be better as we get into, you know, harvesting Q2, and you start to see the crush come up there. Of course, it'll depend on, as we said, the government policies and how the farmer markets. But that'll be, you know, that'll be key. South America, you know, Brazil continues to, you know, currently be strong on new crop, but of course, it's inverted as well, where we're seeing farmer liquidity be slower there. And then the EU right now, pretty strong in the spot, and that's been on meal demand, but again, the curves are inverted there as well. In the US, while the Q1's good, of course, we see the curves kind of be that weaker in Q2 and three, and then contemplate, you know, a better Q4 with the new crop. And then, you know, I think the farmer selling, which I said, it's just slower on all regions, and they'll be, you know, they'll be very hesitant here until the market kind of settles out and we see some direction. Okay. All right. That's some really helpful color. I'll pass it on. Thanks. Thank you. Thanks, Adam. The next question comes from Steven Haynes with Morgan Stanley. Hey, good morning, and thanks for taking my question. If I could just come back to the guidance for 2024 real quick. Was hoping maybe you could just give a bit more color on, on how you see that maybe phasing out over the course of the year. Would imagine that 1Q maybe has, you know, some favorability in it still from the back half of 2024. So, and I know you don't give quarterly guidance, but if you could maybe help size, like, your expectations for the first quarter, versus the balance of the year, that would be helpful. Thank you. Yeah. Steven, this is John. We're looking today, when we look forward at our forecast, we're expecting it to be pretty closely balanced between first half, second half, actually, pretty close to 50/50. And I would say weighting on the first half of the year, more 60/40, and on the back half of the year, kind of the mirror image, more of a 40/60. That's kind of how we're seeing the year at this point. Okay. And then maybe just another quick follow-up on the back half and what you're kind of assuming for the size of the U.S. crop and, you know, how to think about maybe what some of the different scenarios are there. I think you alluded to 4Q being a little bit better because of the U.S. crop, but maybe if we have a larger than expected crop in the back half, like, what do you think that would mean for the outlook that you've currently laid out? Thank you. Yeah, I'd say if you look kind of at a high level, right? We got the Brazil crop, you know, coming in probably, the bean production being in the mid-150s, and that's, you know, versus last year, we were around 160 million metric tons. I mentioned Argentina, bean production be around 50 million tons there, which is, you know, about double what it was last year. And then I think as that sorts out and the market sends the right signals, we'll see how the acres work here in North America, right? And how many bean acres that we end up with and how the growing season, you know, plays itself out. But we do need to, you know, we do need to have a good growing season here in North America, but have no reason right now to, you know, plan on anything else. Yep. Thank you. The next question is from Salvator Tiano of Bank of America. Yes, thank you very much. So the first question I want to ask is specifically about the guidance, and I know you mentioned many times the forward curves in most cases are inverted for crush margins. But, and I understand that's how you give the outlook, but let's say we're sitting here three to six months from now, and would you expect the crush margins to indeed be that low? As you said, liquidity is limited kind of on the forward curve, so is there a chance that things simply will revert and, you know, the outlook for the year may be better? Well, I think that's why we've been consistent about using the forward curves and what we currently see in the environment, when we do give the outlook, because that way it kind of doesn't, you know, flop around depending on our forecasting of what we see in the markets and versus what the public forecasters are saying they see in the market. But that's why I do think those flags that we've called out, right? Weather is always key, how that farmer is going to market, the marketing pattern, and how much on-farm storage that they've got to affect that, and how their financial condition is from a liquidity standpoint. And then the big demand drivers, right? As we talked about, how quickly does demand bounce back on the food side, which is the one we can see snap back pretty quickly. On feed, it looks like animal numbers, you know, roughly flat. Chicken's probably up a little bit, pork might be down a little bit globally, but so the animals are still in place, and how quick do they add animals from a demand standpoint? As that profitability has returned in the animal sector, I think they've seen the worst on their profitability as an industry. Then, you know, this veg oil market's pretty sensitive. If you look globally, you know, palm is not increasing at the production growth that it had historically, and at the same time, they're adding domestic biofuel demand globally on the palm side. So oil tightening up somewhat from a global perspective, while you are growing biofuels in general, renewable diesel specifically and SAF, you know, kind of to come in the future. So you've got a new industry that's trying to decarbonize its liquid fuels because we can do that with vegetable oils, low CI feedstocks, and help them do it at scale. And the market's been sending that signal that we can supply those feedstocks, and we've seen quite a bit of demand that will be coming on in that segment. And so that oil leg can really affect the crush, and that's why we call that flag out, and that'll be a key one to watch as well. So it should be a really interesting 12-18-month kind of transition here, not only on the crops, but as demand continues to grow as well, and as customers kind of move back to trying to drive growth versus cost savings. Okay, perfect. The second question is on merchandising specifically. I guess in Q 2023, it was kind of a wash when you consider the $75 million-$100 million EBIT you've given in normalized earnings, but Q4 was well below that. Would you say now, merchandising, we're in an environment on the ag cycle where merchandising will actually be below that normalized level, or are we still mid-cycle and you know, Q4 was just an anomaly? Yeah. So, you know, I think we call merch to be slightly down here in 2024 versus 2023. And right now, that's probably got it, you know, slightly below where we're at, you know, in our baseline model. But again, you know, merchandising is the toughest one to forecast and is the first one to react if we get some policy changes that affect flows and/or weather, any weather issues that affect production. And I'll tell you, as we continue to grow, you know, more yield on the same amount of acres, and we're seeing more volatile weather patterns, both, you know, dry and wet, that affect production and logistics, that probably just long term leads to more volatility. So the merchandising, you know, will be the one that absorbs that on the short-term changes. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next question is from Thomas Palmer, with Citi. Good morning. Thanks for the question. Good morning. I wanted to ask a little more on the demand pull you're seeing from renewable diesel. I mean, it really has been a kind of key driver over the last couple of years in terms of crush and refined oil. The industry obviously responding on the crush side with added capacity in part to support this industry. I guess, what's the visibility in terms of that demand pull at this point, in terms of absorbing some of this increased supply that's coming from the added crush capacity? Are we still a little bit in waiting mode? It, at different points, you've kind of noted that maybe curves aren't showing it, but you are, you know, at least in touch with customers who are showing, you know, optionality for that increased demand pull on a forward basis. Yeah, we see it continue to grow. I think there's gonna be another 1.4 billion gal of RD capacity come online in the first half of 2024. I think some of the complexity, right, is it isn't just a veg oil game as they grow their demand. The market sent some signals when the pipelines got tight. And so we saw UCO imports. And so as we balance some of that supply and demand, understanding, did we soak up some surpluses? And what'll be the ongoing rate of some of these, you know, imported UCOs and other kind of low CI feedstocks as the market kind of works to balance itself out as that demand comes on. So it's a bit of a, no doubt, a complicated picture on that. And then, of course, you've got policy changing, right? As we move from a blender's credit to a producer's credit in 2025 and in the RIN markets, adjust to that. And then, of course, you've got even things like the CARB policy, where they've signaled that they've got the ability to make changes if the feedstock's available, and now the market's sending signs that the feedstock's available. So we think this will be pretty dynamic. But net-net, we have, you know, increased demand that continues to grow globally, and then we'll see what other policy things, you know, happen generally kind of around the world and, you know, specifically around things like SAF. So the other is how well their new RD operations come up to speed on catalysts and whatnot. Do they need the vegetable oil to be the dilution for some of these other low CI feedstocks and some of these imported feedstocks? So it also depends kind of how they run, and then also the shift that we've said all along, we expect to see at some point as these pretreatment facilities come up, and we see some of the refined oil demand move into crude demand, and so you may see it move from refining margins then into the crush margin. So while we like a complex picture to unwind, this one has really plenty of moving pieces. Yeah, totally. Thank you. Just quickly on the share repo plans. I think as of the October earnings call, you'd spent $134 million on repos, taking it at, what, $600 million between the back half of the year. Should we, as we look at this coming year, expect maybe a more balanced cadence? Because it looks like you kind of stopped, at least for the last couple of months of 2023, but still have, you know, clearly meaningful plans as we look at the time period kind of before Viterra closes. So again, should that be a little more balanced on a repo? Yeah, I think, well, our expectation is between now and, let's say mid-year, we'll have the other 400 bought. You know, timing on close of Viterra is yet to be determined, but I think we won't wait around until we have news for that. I think we'll put it on a pacer to make sure that we're completed by mid-year. Okay. Thank you. The next question is from Sam Margolin with Wolfe Research. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Good morning. My question's on refining, because, you know, it seems like that's the segment where, you know, the commodity headwinds are probably the most visible, but it sounds like there's a technology story there for you, where you're either gaining share or maybe potentially getting some pricing power. And I wonder if you could just talk about the attributes of the yields in the new refineries that are adding value and, you know, how they accrue to the segment growth, and how should--how should we think about that contribution? Thanks. Well, I think on an overall, it's just the team has been running the refineries better. We set some records there in Q4 on volume and capacity utilization in our refineries. So we're just trying to run the system better to meet the demands. And then on our India refinery, that is a new multi-oil capabilities as well as packaging, and that's to meet some current demand as well as some growth. We'll be commissioning that in the first half. That's for our foods business. And then the Avondale refinery, which we bought here in Louisiana, that's really helping on the import of some of the tropical and soft oils to serve our customers with multi-oil. And we were really at capacity there in serving our food customers here in North America. So that's freed up capacity and given us some extra capabilities. And we also had some equipment headed for another facility that we've already pointed at Avondale, and we're gonna expand that facility already. So we'll be doing that work during the year. So that's really about capabilities and flexibility on the food side, which is the other, as John talked about, a little farther out, but our Amsterdam facility will be kind of the same thing. That's a great specialty oils market over there. We'll have really the most flexibility, we think in Europe. We'll have the best carbon footprint and the lowest cost facility when we get that done, but that's just getting underway, so that'll be out in 2026 before we have the benefits of that. But also, with these new facilities, they're all improving the carbon footprint versus the facilities that we were running before. So we continue to focus on sustainability as we make those investments as well. Sam. Yes. Sam, I would add that, you know, food is still 75%-80% of our volume on refined oil. So while energy certainly has been a nice demand for us, food is a big focus. You know, we have very big downstream customers, and they depend on us from a traceability, sustainability standpoint and to be able to provide a multi-oil. So that's still the primary focus of that RSO segment. Okay, thanks. That's super helpful. And then, you know, just to follow up on capital allocation and the discretionary CapEx component. You know, I think this year it feels like it has more of the characteristics of sort of a trough year than maybe something structurally problematic, and so it makes sense that, you know, discretionary CapEx is still at the top of your queue. But, I mean, is there anything that- a scenario that you can imagine that might cause you to decelerate growth CapEx, or any market conditions specifically, that you're watching for that could change, maybe change the mix of your capital allocation and move growth CapEx kind of lower on the priority list? Thanks. Yeah, I don't—I mean, the reality is most of the projects that are in our growth pipeline now are all underway. So the bulk of it won't change because we're still—we still believe those are great long-term projects. You know, certainly around the fringes, as new things come up, you know, we may trade off between that and M&A, which we have done some of. We've seen some great bolt-on M&A opportunities and have allocated some capital that direction instead. But I would say, largely, our forward track here for 2024 and 2025 is pretty locked in from a CapEx standpoint. I see. Thank you. Sure. The next question is from Davis Sunderland with Baird. Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Good morning. Morning. I was just one for me. Was curious about the cost structure for processing and RSO, maybe just how this has evolved as new capacity has come online in the industry. And maybe any comments you guys could give on variable cost changes over the last few years, and how your cost structure compares to competitors, would be helpful. Sure. This is John. You know, look, I think we have not been immune to the inflation that we saw over the last few years relative to kind of started during COVID and worked its way through. But what we've seen recently is energy prices coming off quite a bit, especially in Europe, which has lowered our variable costs over there quite a bit. I think our belief is that we're probably or probably close to the most efficient in the industry or certainly, you know, on par with others. And it's, you know, as you can imagine, the higher cost areas generally is gonna be U.S. with inflation and in Europe, with energy costs and inflation. But we also have some very, you know, very low-cost production areas. Brazil certainly is an area where costs are much lower than the average, and in Asia as well. But highly competitive, and I think, again, we've seen things come off certainly, and I think, you know, where we're focused on a lot of our capital recently, especially on the sustaining side, has been focused on improvements and the efficiencies in the plants. I think we will continue to be able to do a good job of offsetting some of the inflation that we're seeing just naturally. So we feel, I think, pretty good about where we are from an efficiency standpoint right now. That's great. I'll pass it on. Thanks, guys. Thank you. The next question is from Andrew Strelzik with BMO. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. First for me, I was hoping you could compare the current environment and the curves to the $8.50 EPS assumptions and the baseline more broadly. I guess it seems like, for the most part, most of the profitability and margin structures are similar to those assumptions, especially on the crush side, if you were able to lock in the first quarter a little higher. The exceptions may be, you said, a little bit weaker on merchandising, and if a couple hundred million lower on refined oils is right, and I add the buyback, your, the math is something like $10 plus, I think. And I understand the, you know, the volatility of the environment, et cetera, but am I thinking about that correctly? Is there anything else that's, you know, materially weaker than kind of the baseline assumptions? Yeah, I can, I can start, and Greg can jump in. I, I think, you know, actually, our margin assumptions right now for 2024 are better than the baseline. You know, marginally better than where we were in the $850 baseline assumptions. So we think that'll hold for the year, if not improve. Where we're seeing a little and that's probably more on the soft side than the soy side, you know, the higher assumption around margin structure and what we're seeing today. I think where we see the downside versus our baseline is really in merchandising. You know, as we look forward, you know, we have a—Greg pointed out, there's not a lot of visibility going forward in that, and based on, you know, how we finished 2023, we've kept a lower forecast in for them in 2024, which is actually lower than what we have in our baseline. But on the other side, RSO is higher. So, those are kind of the big things in terms of the commercial side of it. When you look at the non-business part of it or the other items, interest expense, you know, is quite a bit higher than what we had in our baseline, driven by interest rates, certainly, and then a little bit higher effective tax rate as we've seen some tax legislation changes globally. So interest and taxes are higher. Soy on the margin side, soy and soft are higher from an expectation. RSO is higher, and then merchandising is lower. So it's kind of how I think about it. Probably the only thing on the commercial side that we didn't mention, while the margins on crush are a little higher than the baseline, the volume is just a little bit lower, and that's due to, you know, we exited Russia as a choice, and then in Ukraine, our volume is down with the war ongoing there. Yeah, and maybe just one other thing to add, too, as you're thinking through this share buyback, certainly, is we've done more of that than we had in our original baseline model. I think we modeled $250 million a year in our baseline assumption, and of course, we've accelerated that with the Viterra transaction coming. Okay, great. That was super helpful. And I guess maybe my other question, I'm used to thinking about, you know, the guidance in terms of a plus and you being asked about upside opportunities. You've discussed a lot of the risks here, and you know I appreciate the change in kind of the guidance presentation to the approximately $9. But can you talk about where there might be upside opportunities if we're looking for those, where you think the greatest opportunities might lie throughout the year? Thanks. Yeah, I think they're probably the same key ones. You know, China, always a big factor, their economy, and if it would speed up from a demand, and then how China is going to think about any stock building, because they can definitely make a change on these markets that are really still pretty close in the supply and demand balance. Any type of weather situation at all, the balance sheets are pretty tight. We could see increased volatility, and that would also probably drive not only more farmer selling, but it would also drive the consumers to be farther out on the curve and do more purchasing. And, you know, they've gotten comfortable again, where we had some just-in-case inventory building. Everyone's kind of forgotten the supply chain problems, and we've definitely seen customers pulling down stocks in that just-in-time inventory again. So if you saw any concern on S&Ds or supply chain problems and saw a build back that way, the overall growth in demand from the lower prices, whether that's the animal industry adding capacity and/or the consumer responding across feed, food, or fuel more quickly to the lower prices. And then Argentina, always a very, you know, a very big driver, of course, the size of their crop, how the farmer is going to commercialize that. And of course, a lot of that will be driven by the government policy and their ability to put the incentives out there in the way they want to with what they're trying to accomplish. And then, of course, importantly, biofuels in general, globally, how that continues to develop policy, and how the different feedstocks are weighing off in the global oil balance, with keeping palm in mind as well. So those are a few of the flags that we're watching carefully, and it should be a really interesting, you know, 12-18 months here going forward as we have a number of things transitioning. Great. I appreciate the thoughts. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Greg Heckman for any closing remarks. I'd like to thank everyone for joining us today and for your interest, and I guess I'd just like to wrap up by saying, you know, we've tried to reflect in our outlook, you know, what has changed for 2024, but I sure want to also reflect what has not changed. And what hasn't changed, right, is there's long-term growth and demand for the things we make and the services that we provide with them, and that is across all three food, feed, and fuel markets. The growth in biofuels, that's a near-term issue, and that trend is in place. The improvements in our operating model, those continue, and we'll continue to focus on how to make sure that we don't stop with our focus on continuous improvement. Our 2026 baseline target remains unchanged. We continue to have a great pipeline of projects and investments with good returns. Our pending acquisitions are on track, and our share purchase commitment is ongoing. So those are things that haven't changed. We feel good about what we're doing, very proud of our team, and we'll continue to stay focused. So thanks for your interest. Look forward to speaking to you again soon. Have a great day. The conference now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.