Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Bio-Rad Third Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. If at any time during this call you require immediate assistance, please press star zero for the operator. Please be advised that today's call is being recorded on Thursday, October 26th, 2023. I would now like to turn the conference over to Edward Chung, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. Today, we will review the third quarter 2023 financial results and provide an update on key business trends for Bio-Rad. With me on the call today are Norman Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer, Ilan Daskal, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Andy Last, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Simon May, President of the Life Science Group, and Dara Wright, President of the Clinical Diagnostics Group. Before we begin our review, I'd like to caution everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans and expectations, our future financial performance, and other matters. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from these plans, goals, and expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and I encourage you to review our filings with the SEC, where we discuss in detail the risk factors in our business. The company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements made during the call today. Finally, our remarks today will include references to non-GAAP financials, including net income and diluted earnings per share, which are financial measures that are not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. Investors should review these reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to comparable GAAP results contained in our earnings release. With that, I will now turn the call over to Andy Last, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to provide an update on Bio-Rad's global operations. Many thanks, Ed, and good afternoon to everybody, and thank you for joining us. Well, the third quarter of the year fell below our expectations. The ongoing challenges within the biopharma segment and economic constraints in China continued to drive lower Life Sciences performance in the quarter. Clinical Diagnostics sales were weaker than we forecasted, impacted mainly by the softer China market conditions. We still anticipate a strong year-over-year growth for clinical diagnostics group in the fourth quarter. We continue to successfully maintain focus on tight cost control, and on the supply chain front, we experienced modest constraints in supply for our clinical business, which impacted Q3 sales. Backlog remains on track to meet our year-end expectations. In Q3, we experienced further reduced demand from biopharma customers for our process chromatography resins and from both biopharma and smaller biotech customers for our Life Science research projects, products. The continued tight spending environment in this segment constrained core ddPCR sales, which were roughly flat from the year ago period. Academic and government sales for Life Sciences were strong in the Americas, but showed declines in APAC, driven down by China economic and policy constraints. EMEA academic sales were roughly flat, reflecting a soft funding environment in Germany, offset by stronger performance in the other European countries. While ddPCR sales within the quarter were softer than expected as a result of biopharma spending, we remain very positive on the long-term growth outlook for the platform. During the quarter, we were encouraged by several noteworthy announcements involving ddPCR. On the clinical testing front, our QX ONE platform has been selected for SMA testing for all newborns in Hong Kong. Here in the U.S., Geneoscopy announced they have published the results of their pivotal CRC-PREVENT clinical trial, reporting the highest sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer among similar tests, powered by our QX Dx ddPCR platform. Additionally, in the U.S., Verily won a major multi-year national wastewater testing contract from the CDC based on our QX600 platform. We see these as contributors to future growth and a strong reinforcement of the versatility and impact of the technology. As highlighted earlier, China was a continued challenge in Q3 for our Life Sciences business, and unfortunately, the economic constraints have now also impacted our Clinical Diagnostics business, which in the first half of the year had been a positive for us in this region. We have now further constrained our expectations for China for the year-end and look to 2024 before we expect to see signs of recovery. Our clinical business overall had a mixed quarter. We saw growth in demand in the U.S. and Europe as expected, which was partially offset by the softness in China. In particular, we were pleased with the continued momentum for our immunohematology and diabetes franchises in the quarter. Despite the market challenges of this year, we view our strategy framework as being very solid and our platforms and market opportunities as providing sustainable long-term growth. We continue to focus on driving and improving our execution, and with completion of a single global instance of SAP have now completed a major component of operational improvement. Looking to the end of the year, we continue to expect the biopharma and small biotech company turn, company turndown, and ongoing constraints in China and Russia to impact the overall growth to our Life Sciences business. Although we do expect to see sequentially improved sales in the final quarter of the year. We remain positive on the momentum and continued growth in the Clinical Diagnostics business, although somewhat moderated by the greater market constraints in China, as well as ongoing trade restrictions in Russia. Thank you, and at this point, I will now pass you to Ilan to review the financial results. Thank you, Andy. Now I would like to review the results of the third quarter. Net sales for the third quarter of 2023 were $632.1 million, which is a decline of 7.1% on a reported basis, versus $680.8 million in Q3 of 2022, and a 7.9% decline on a currency- neutral basis. The third quarter year-over-year revenue decline was primarily the result of ongoing weakness in the biopharma end markets, impacting the sales of our Life Science tools and bioprocessing products. In addition, we experienced weaker demand in China as a result of the macroeconomic environment, as well as the local Made in China initiatives. COVID-related sales in Q3 were $300,000 versus about $17.2 million in Q3 last year. Core revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, decreased 5.5% on a currency- neutral basis. On a geographic basis, currency- neutral year-over-year core revenue decreased in Asia and Europe, partially offset by increased sales in the Americas. Sales of the Life Science Group in the third quarter of 2023 were $263.5 million, compared to $317.9 million in Q3 of 2022, which is a decline of 17.1% on a reported basis and a 17.8% decline on a currency- neutral basis. Excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science Group year-over-year currency neutral core revenue decreased 13.7% and was primarily driven by lower sales of qPCR, Process Chromatography, Western blotting products, and about flat year-over-year ddPCR revenue. Excluding Process Chromatography sales, the underlying Life Science business decreased 16.7% on a currency- neutral basis versus Q3 of 2022. The Life Science Group revenue, excluding Process Chromatography and COVID-related sales, decreased 11.6% on a currency- neutral basis. On a geographic basis, Life Science year-over-year core revenue decreased in Asia and Europe, partially offset by a modest increased sales in the Americas. Sales of the Clinical Diagnostics Group in the third quarter were $368.1 million, compared to $361.9 million in Q3 of 2022, or growth of 1.7% on a reported basis and a 1% growth on a currency neutral basis. Core clinical diagnostics year-over-year revenue, which excludes COVID-related sales, increased 1.4% on a currency- neutral basis. Growth of the Clinical Diagnostics Group was primarily driven by blood typing and diabetes products, as well as growth from our quality controls portfolio. On a geographic basis, the Diagnostics Group posted currency neutral year-over-year core revenue growth in the Americas and Europe, partially offset by the decline in Asia. The reported gross margin for the third quarter of 2023 was 53.1% on a GAAP basis, and compares to 54.7% in Q3 of 2022. The year-over-year gross margin decline was mainly due to unfavorable product mix, lower manufacturing volumes, higher material costs and inventory reserves, and was partially offset by improved logistics costs. Amortization related to prior acquisitions recorded in cost of goods sold was $4.5 million, compared to $4.4 million in Q3 of 2022. Third quarter operating expenses benefited from our cost-cutting initiatives, as well as a contingent consideration benefit of $18.9 million from last year's acquisition of Curiosity Diagnostics. SG&A expenses for Q3 of 2023 were $201.2 million, or 31.8% of sales, compared to $211.1 million, or 31% in Q3 of 2022. The lower SG&A in the quarter included $4.1 million in contingent consideration benefit, as I mentioned earlier, as well as lower employee-related expenses. Total amortization expense related to acquisition recorded in SG&A for the quarter was $1.6 million, versus $1.8 million in Q3 of 2022. Research and development expense in the third quarter was $43.5 million, or 6.9% of sales, compared to $66.8 million or 9.8% of sales in Q3 of 2022. The significantly lower R&D expenses recorded in the third quarter included $14.8 million in contingent consideration benefit, that I mentioned earlier, as well as lower project and employee-related expenses. Q3 operating income was $90.9 million or 14.4% of sales, compared to $94.6 million or 13.9% of sales in Q3 of 2022. Looking below the operating line, the change in fair market value of equity security holdings, which are substantially related to Bio-Rad's ownership of Sartorius AG shares, added $36.4 million of income to the reported results. During the quarter, interest and other income resulted in net other income of $9.7 million, compared to net other expense of $13 million last year, primarily driven by increased interest income from investments. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2023 was 22.5%, compared to 21.5% in Q3 of last year. The effective tax rate this quarter was primarily affected by an unrealized gain in equity securities, and the tax rate reported in Q3 of 2022 was primarily affected by an unrealized loss in equity securities. Reported net income for the third quarter was $106.3 million, or $3.64 diluted earnings per share, compared to a loss of $162.8 million, or $5.48 diluted loss per share in Q3 of 2022. This change from last year is largely related to changes in the valuation of the Sartorius holdings. Moving on to the non-GAAP results. Looking at the results on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded certain atypical and unique items that impacted both the gross and operating margins, as well as other income. These items are detailed in the reconciliation table in the press release. Looking at the non-GAAP results for the third quarter, in cost of goods sold, we have excluded $4.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and a small restructuring expense. These exclusions moved the gross margin from 53.1% for the third quarter of 2023 to a non-GAAP gross margin of 53.9% versus 55.6% in Q3 of 2022. Non-GAAP SG&A in the third quarter of 2023 was 31.7% versus 30% in Q3 of 2022. In SG&A, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $4.1 million of an acquisition related to the contingent consideration benefit mentioned earlier, an in vitro diagnostic registration fee in Europe for previously approved products of $1.9 million, amortization of purchased intangibles of $1.6 million, and $1.3 million of restructuring-related expenses. Non-GAAP R&D in the third quarter of 2023 was 9.2% versus 9.7% in Q3 of 2022. In R&D, on a non-GAAP basis, we have excluded $14.8 million of an acquisition related to the contingent consideration benefit mentioned earlier, and a small restructuring benefit. The cumulative sum of these non-GAAP adjustments result in moving the quarterly operating margin from 14.4% on a GAAP basis to 12.9% on a non-GAAP basis. This non-GAAP operating margin compares to a non-GAAP operating margin of 15.8% in Q3 of 2022. We have also excluded certain items below the operating line, which are the increase in value of the Sartorius equity securities and loan receivable holdings of $36.4 million, $2.5 million gain from the release of an escrow for an acquisition, and about a $700,000 loss associated with venture investments. The non-GAAP effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2023 was 23.9%, compared to 21.7% for the same period in 2022. The higher rate in 2023 was driven by geographical mix of earnings and reduced compensation-related deductions. We continue to estimate the full year non-GAAP tax rate to be between 22% and 23%. And finally, non-GAAP net income for the third quarter of 2023 was $68.1 million, or $2.33 diluted earnings per share, compared to $79.2 million, or diluted earnings per share of $2.64 in Q3 of 2022. Moving on to the balance sheet. During the third quarter, we purchased 58,478 shares of our stock at an average share price of $364.61 for a total cost of $21.3 million. We still have nearly $480 million remaining in our Board authorized share repurchase program, and plan to continue with our opportunistic approach to buybacks as part of our capital allocation strategy. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q3 was $1.765 billion, compared to $1.728 billion at the end of Q2 of 2023. The increase in cash and short-term investments from the second quarter was primarily due to changes in working capital. Inventory at the end of Q3 was $775.8 million, which is slightly lower than the inventory in the prior quarter. For the third quarter of 2023, net cash generated from operating activities was $97.7 million, which compares to $11 million in Q3 of 2022. This increase mainly reflects changes in working capital and income tax payments. The adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2023 was $112.7 million, or 17.8% of sales. The adjusted EBITDA in Q3 of 2022 was $135.7 million, or 19.9% of sales. Net capital expenditures for the third quarter of 2023 were $44 million, and depreciation and amortization for the third quarter was $37.3 million. Moving on to the non-GAAP guidance. Given the current market environment, we are revising our 2023 financial outlook as follows. We now expect about a 3.5% currency- neutral year-over-year revenue decline in 2023, versus a growth of about 80 basis points previously. For the full year, we estimate currency neutral year-over-year revenue growth, excluding COVID-related sales, to be between 0-50 basis points, versus about 4.5% in our prior guidance. Of the 400-450 basis points core revenue guide down, 250 basis points are related to the third quarter revenue shortfall, of which approximately 200 basis points is related to weakness in biopharma, and remaining 50 basis points related to lower Clinical Diagnostic sales. The remaining 150-200 basis points reduction is attributed to reduced process chromatography and other biopharma demand, as well as continued softness in China. For the Life Science Group, we expect about a 12% currency- neutral revenue decline for 2023, and when excluding COVID-related sales, the Life Science Group currency- neutral revenue decline is projected to be between 4%- 5%. Excluding COVID and process chromatography-related sales, Life Science Group revenue is expected to decline between 2%- 3%. For the Diagnostics Group, while we remain encouraged with the overall demand, we are now guiding core revenue growth to be about 4.5% versus 5.5% previously. Full year non-GAAP gross margin is now projected to be about 54% versus about 64.5% previously, reflecting our updated expectation of shift in product mix and volume. We now project full year non-GAAP operating margin to be about 14.5% versus approximately 16% in our prior guidance, as we continue to carefully manage discretionary expenses. Full year adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be between 20%- 20.5% versus about 21.5% in our prior guidance. Now I'll turn the call over to Norman for a few remarks. Norman? Thank you, Ilan. So, I guess I just wanted to take a minute here to, to really to recognize Ilan and his contributions over the last several years. You know, as, as part of our transformation, you know, Ilan has been a very valued member of the team, kind of working to improve financial planning and reporting processes, as well as to enhance the company's external profile with the financial community. And I think we all very much appreciate his guidance and contributions, which, which do position us well for our continuing transformation. As you might imagine, we have initiated a search for a successor, and in the meantime, you know, we have a strong, capable team, who can manage very well in the interim. So maybe while I have the floor, maybe a closing comment about this year. Certainly, it's not unfolded the way we or many of our peers first envisioned it. Kind of coming out of the pandemic, I think it has been challenging to predict the pace of recovery or market normalization, really all exacerbated by inflation we've not seen in 20 years, geopolitical events, and of course, the biopharma disruption. I think if I think about it a little bit, I think what we can be confident of is that our markets are buoyant, and I feel the outlook is positive. There could always be a few more bumps in the road in the near term, but I do feel the company is really well positioned to navigate what might come our way. Just maybe to reemphasize a point that Andy made, you know, longer term, our strategy and vision for the future really has not changed. With that, operator, I think we'll open the line up to questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question- and- answer session. Should you have a question, please press the star followed by the number one on your cell phone keypad. You will hear a three-tone prompt acknowledging your request, and your questions will be pulled in the order they are received. Should you wish to decline from the calling process, please press the star followed by the number two. If you're using a speakerphone, please speak to handset before pressing any keys. One moment, please, for your first question. Your first question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open. Hey, thanks. Good afternoon. I'm not sure if this is a better question for Andy or Ilan, but the magnitude of the guidance reset in Life Sciences relative to where you started the year is the most dramatic of any of your peers by far. Why does there seem to be such an inability to accurately forecast the business and demand trends? And how do we assess whether this is in fact a market dynamic as opposed to potential share losses? Could you just say the very last piece again, Brandon? Didn't catch your very last few words. Yeah, I'm saying, how do we assess whether this is, in fact, a market dynamic versus potential share losses in Life Sciences? Okay. Look, I think that we came out of 2022 with really good trajectory, and the effects that some companies had seen, particularly in bioprocessing, were not showing up for us. I think that's something that we communicated at the end of the first quarter, that that was a surprise. It took a while within 2023 for those effects to really roll out into our funnel and start to experience the deferred orders being pushed out. I think the other factor that no one anticipated and which, you know, was meaningful for us, was the Silicon Valley Bank collapse and the knock-on effects of that, which, you know, really impacted the spending profile of the smaller biotech companies. We'd had significant trajectory in the smaller biotechs for, in particular, our Droplet Digital PCR platform, which also had some halo effects around it. You know, I think it took a couple of quarters for those effects to really materialize for us, because our profile is a little different to some of the other players. That's how I view it. Of course, since then, spending has not improved, order pushouts have continued, and it's very difficult to gauge, you know, the true inflection point right now. I think that's probably a message that's coming across broadly from other players in the category as well. This is Simon. Maybe I'll just add to that as well, because as we look at our funnels and we look at our win-loss ratios across the portfolio, whether you're talking about Western blot or gene expression, or Digital PCR, or our bioprocess business, we really don't see any significant shifts there. I mean, obviously, the conditions in China and biopharma have really deteriorated, but the feedback that we consistently get from the field is that there's still a high level of interest in the products. The products that we've launched have been really well received. And again, the funnel dynamics in terms of win-loss ratios are not seeing any significant shifts. So we really do believe that this is a bunch of transient effects that are compounding, and it's making for a very difficult year, but I don't think there are any macro shifts in our competitive positioning in Life Sciences. Okay, Ilan, I think the revised guide implies 4Q revenue steps up to about $700 million, I believe. 4Q is usually seasonally very strong for Bio-Rad, but this isn't a normal environment either. So how big risk is that revenue outlook? What are some of the variables that could swing that target up or down, that you're keeping in mind? So it's Andy. The variables that might swing that, I think they're the same that we're, you know, the variables would really be, you know, the same that we're experiencing, just a little bit more acute. If China gets definitively worse than the trajectory it's on, for example, that would, you know, if academia really pulled back from spending, that could have an effect. You know, we're not expecting a Q4 budget flush this year. That's not in our thinking. You know, if that materializes, that's good news, but we're not, we're not planning on that. I think other than that, I don't, I don't think we see anything that may be, you know, meaningful that we could predict. Brandon, I will add to, you know, the inputs that Andy just mentioned. Generally speaking, you know, we have not deviated from our approach of kind of coming up with a realistic, what we see in front of us in terms of the forecast and the guidance. So I don't know that, you know, we are underestimating or overestimating our projections. And, you know, definitely the fourth quarter this time around is an unusual circumstance in addition to the, you know, the macroeconomic kind of environment, to add to, and these kind of inputs, maybe the China environment today. I mean, I think it's going to continue well into the end of the year. So, you know, the smaller biotechnology companies environment, in terms of the funding environment, are not expected to, you know, improve in our mind, you know, through the end of this year. So, I agree with you, you know, historically, traditionally, the fourth quarter used to be a stronger seasonality kind of quarter for us. That is not the case, you know, this time around. Okay. Last one, then I'll jump back in the queue. Andy, given you and Ilan started at Bio-Rad around the same time, you've worked very closely together. You've both been instrumental to Bio-Rad's transformation last four years or so. In light of his departure, I think investors would like to know, are you happy with the operational direction of the company? Are you adequately incentivized to stay the course, or do you have an eye to retirement anytime soon? Thanks. Yeah, Brandon, thanks. And first, can I just say I'm really sad to see Ilan move on, you're right, we have worked extremely closely. I, he and I are in each other's offices virtually every day. So, it's been a really good journey. I want to thank Ilan for that, personally o n the call. Likewise. But you know, my point of view right now is we started this transition, it's not finished. You know, and the focus really is on the transformation of the company, and executing against the strategy framework, which I firmly believe has potential to increase operating performance for the company moving forward. Thank you. Thanks, Brandon. Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly from Citi. Your line is open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe another one on the 4Q ramp, but on the margin side, you know, pretty meaningful step up from whether it's sequential or the rest of the year. Can you just talk about the moving pieces to get to that implied margin? I think it's 16.5%-17% type margin in 4Q. Yeah, just the path to get there and get people comfortable that's a realistic number. Sure. Hey, Patrick, this is Ilan. I'll start, and Andy can chime in. Obviously, you know, on the top line, you know, we baked in kind of the updated mix, with, you know, the softer Life Science. And, overall, I mean, you know, on the operating expenses, you know, we plan to continue some of those, you know, initiatives that we have been working on. Already in the third quarter, you can see that, you know, the operating expenses came in, you know, lower on a dollar basis. We, you know, we continue to work on additional initiatives, going into the fourth quarter. Again, overall, for the bottom line, I mean, we feel it is a realistic, you know, projection here. Yeah, my only add with, you know, we're still focused on keeping our operating cost structure as tight as possible. So, volume and mix, you know, will have a decent flow through for the fourth quarter operating margins. Okay. And then, maybe on China, you know, if you can just talk about that market. You know, a little bit surprising to see the diagnostics piece softer, as well. Can you just talk about what you're seeing? Is it various policies over there that's impacting things? It would be helpful just to get a little more discussion there. Oh, okay. So the policies, I mean, are clearly impacting both Life Science and the Diagnostic side of the business. And they have, you know, the Made in China for China. There's the anti-corruption, there's volume-based pricing, and then you layer on top of that, recession. And the government, I think, is generally struggling to find the right way to stimulate the market. You can add in an extra effect of capital markets soft for biopharma, which was a focus for us f or expansion and growth of our, those pieces of our portfolio. You know, they all have varying impacts to both sides of the business. You know, and it's just been a really tough ride through China, and there's just no current clear reason to think that it's going to improve in Q4. And on the Clinical side, it just created a softer pull for our products in China in the quarter. And, you know, we still have had a little bit of backlog on our clinical business as we called out, which, you know, by the end of this year, we should be roughly where we expect to be. We may finish with a very slightly elevated backlog on clinical products at the end of the year, but we're pretty much on track, relatively speaking for that. Okay. On the diagnostic side, is it more the instrumentation? You know, obviously, the VBP stuff comes up quite often with all diagnostic players. Are you guys seeing anything on that front yet? T he volume-based pricing. Sorry, yeah, we were just having difficulty hearing. Dara, do you want to comment on, on VBP? Sure. You know, it's starting to impact, you know, how we navigate tender requirements. So I think how that's translating to reality is, you know, things are a little bit slower as we're navigating, you know, how best to position for new deal considerations. But value-based pricing, you know, it has historically been applied to other sectors, but in a couple of provinces, we're starting to see it, you know, reach into IVD. So I think right now it's just sort of impacting sort of forward-looking risk. And then, as Andy said, you know, we're still working through some supply chain fulfillment challenges and backlog, which were, you know, weighted a bit towards that region as well. And we're working through that and have line of sight for a really solid Q4 landing. Okay. And maybe last one, just on the PCR side, you know, you guys called out, I think, qPCR weakness. It seemed like ddPCR stepped down as well. Can you just talk about what you're seeing in that market? Is it just a broader slowdown? Is it specific, specific pockets there, would be helpful. I think, again, it's compounding the issues that we've already touched on here. So we've obviously got a fairly significant qPCR, Digital PCR footprint in biopharma, and again, the slowdown in early biotechs. We've seen a continuation of layoffs and project deferrals. That's impacted the business. We've got the COVID compare, we've got all the challenges in China that we've already talked about. And I think on top of everything else, there's kind of a glut of systems out there in the market that were placed in the pandemic, and there's a bit of free capacity out there. So you roll all of these things together. Again, we refreshed our qPCR platform over the last couple of years, and again, the feedback that we get from out in the field is really positive in terms of how these products are being received in the market. This compounding of market conditions right now is what's adding up to a tough environment. May I just add one extra, you know, comment? Look, you know, you look for the silver lining on occasion and the customer demand in that, in small biotech biopharma, the desire to take in Digital PCR, in particular, remains very strong. What we've, what we're actually experiencing is just the deferral of when they're going to make the purchase, you know, because they're constrained on, on kind of cash expenditure and some other changes going on structurally and on program focus. The demand side remains very encouraging. Okay. Thanks, guys. Thanks. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan from Nephron. Your line is open. Thanks. Good afternoon. Just wanted to talk about how the quarter played out here. Revenue was about 8% below the street. Can you just talk about kind of the pacing of the quarter? Was most of the pressure you saw in September, and is it possible there are any orders that slipped into 4Q for any reason? I think, Jack, hi, this is Ilan. The way, you know, to think about it, I think we saw it throughout the quarter, but it accelerated towards the end of the quarter. So the pace was kind of, of decline, was stronger towards the end of the quarter. But throughout the quarter, it started to get weaker and weaker, but definitely it accelerated, you know, towards the end. Okay. And, you know, Norman, I know you mentioned, you know, in your comments, there's the potential for maybe a couple more bumps in the road along the way. I think there's a debate, you know, amongst tools investors around, you know, are we further through the cutting cycle or, you know, could there be kind of new risks ahead because of some of the changes in the funding environment for customers? Just curious, like, you know, maybe, like, what you're seeing through October, you know, I guess like kind of what was the thinking that went behind the fourth quarter guide that you built here? Well, you know, I think, you know, certainly in the, in terms of the fourth quarter guide, we, you know, we looked very carefully at, at kind of the order book, and the funnel, the sales funnel, kind of accumulating as much data as we can, to get the best assessment of w here we think we'll land for the year. You know, when I think about bumps in the road, you know, I think about, you know, there were a lot of people that, that kind of thought the pandemic is over, and everything will be back to normal next week. You know, I think we're seeing a continuation of that with the, you know, with some of this kind of biopharma meltdown and the readjustments that are being made in some of these programs. You know, it just, I think we just have to be careful about, you know, about calling the end and saying, "You know, i t's always possible that there's something else that might bubble up. Understood. Okay. And then, on the income statement, you know, you previously talked about kind of OpEx reductions. You know, I was looking at the SG&A line, kind of on a non-GAAP basis, it actually increased a little bit sequentially, and that was despite kind of revenue declining sequentially. So I was just wondering if you could talk about what happened in SG&A in the quarter, and, like, is there room to, like, pull more cost out, given the lower top line? So, usually, you know, what you see, it was a minor kind of step- up, Jack. You know, usually on the fourth quarter, we see a much higher kind of step up in SG&A, which, you know, this time around, actually, more of the initiatives that we have been working on will kick in in the fourth quarter. So, we don't anticipate, you know, the traditional step up in the fourth quarter. For the third quarter, it wasn't, you know, that material. Okay. Thank you, guys. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Tim Daley from Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Great. Thank you. First on the process chromatography business. I think you were previously expecting down mid-single to high-single decline. With the update today, I'm getting 13% down or so for the year. Even with that, that implies a pretty significant step up in the fourth quarter, I think almost like 80% sequential dollar increase from 3Q to 4Q. First off, are these numbers that I'm kind of getting to in the right ballpark? Can you help us understand the visibility, confidence that you have to kind of get that big sequential step up, especially given the commentary around, you know, a slower or lower than typical seasonality for this year- end? Hi, this is Andy. I think maybe the, it's kind of, some of the math might be a little off there. I think the process chrom overall is going to, it's gonna end up at a lower number. It kind of is the guidance simplification there. It's kind of like mid-teens. Well, I don't think we're seeing a meaningful step up in process chrom in Q4. Yeah, I think that's really probably just a bit of math there. It's slightly higher. All right. Got it. That's helpful. And then Andy, can you know, the supply chain impacts, weighing on the third quarter Diagnostics revenues, can you just provide some detail then, like, what is that? How big the impact was in the quarter, and if you expect those delayed revenues to be fully recuperated in the fourth quarter? Yeah. So essentially, you know, we've obviously, we've been communicating, you know, supply chain challenge on the clinical side because of, you know, various impacts of COVID plus removed our plants from France to Singapore. We're catching up quickly, but it's, you know, sometimes difficult to get the pacing of that right. So, you know, if you get a bit of delay, you also get a bit of pull-through, consumable pull-through delay as well. That backs it a bit in to our Q3. We are looking at a pretty strong Q4, and we have good line of sight now. Our plant in Singapore is really cranking. We've done a lot of work, leaning out the workflows there. And so we're gonna get the benefit of that in Q4 and also get some pull-through effects. So Q3 just ended up being softer as a result overall. All right. Thank you. And then, you know, final one here for Norman. With the 2023 guidance now 400 basis points lower, you know, that midterm CAGR for 2025, the guidance updated in May, now has an incremental 100 basis points or so steeper, I guess, headwind in front of it. So given the current environment, how are you evaluating the 2025 target? Or is this something that maybe we'll wait until a new CFO is in the seat to put their own fingerprints on, if you will? Tim, this is Ilan. I'll chime in, and then, you know, Norman probably will have some additional color. You know, already in the prior quarter, we communicated that the 2025 target from our perspective is kind of in a holding pattern. We would like to get more insight and visibility going into 2024 in order to shape, you know, our thinking about the 2025 targets. Probably, you know, in the next kind of earnings call, early next year, when we have the 2024 kind of guidance in front of us, the 2025 numbers, you know, we, we'll know how to think about it and, and, and, and to see what, what are the reason impact and what magnitude, et cetera. No, I think that's, I think that covers it pretty well. Yeah. Okay, great. Well, Ilan, great working with you. Hope you all the best in the next endeavor, and thanks everybody for the time. Thanks, team. Likewise. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Conor McNamara from RBC Capital. Your line is open. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Just without getting into 2024 guidance, just how, how should we think about 2024 in general, and just which headwinds that you called out in this quarter are likely to persist in 2024 and which are likely to end by the end of this year? If any. Hey, Conor, this is Ilan. I can start, you know, with obviously various aspects that are associated with the macroeconomic. You know, I'm not sure personally that, you know, China will recover, like, in a few weeks. That may take a little bit longer. The funding environment, which is obviously indirectly links, you know, to the treasury yield, is here to stay. The inflationary environment is here to stay for a while. That does and probably will continue for a while to have some impact on the smaller biotechnology companies' funding and the way they think about the pace of their spend, you know. So, these are definitely, you know, areas that we want to kind of think about it, to think about, and then, you know, not to mention, you know, the geopolitical everywhere now that is getting kind of, you know, into to probably a new level, the level that we have not experienced before. So there are multiple fronts there that and, you know, when you think about Europe, I mean, overall for us, Europe, generally speaking, you know, is doing okay for us. But when you think about the macroeconomic, you know, Germany is probably already in a recession, so, so it's going to be interesting. I mean, specifically, the domestically, we're going into, you know, an election year domestically. So, we'll have to to wait and see how everything, you know, will shape up. But that doesn't, you know, that doesn't have to do anything with our own kind of organic initiatives, products, new products, you know, the end markets that, you know, are not disappearing, they're not going anywhere. So, it's only from, from my perspective, only a timing issue. Okay, great. Just following up to Patrick's question about PCR, can you just talk about ddPCR specifically? Because that slowdown was worse than any of your other business units. You know, can you give investors some, you know, framework to think about how that's-- how we can get comfort that that's definitely a market environment and not competitive pressure? Because there have been some competitors out there making some noise. We just want to make sure that you still feel, still feel good about your market position there in ddPCR. I still think we feel good about the position. I mean, we've made no secret of the fact that the competitive landscape is intensifying. As we reflect on Q3, I think as we called out in the script, we've had a couple of really notable wins there that we think are going to help continue to position us well for the future. I think what we really saw in Q3, again, is an exacerbation of these biopharma impacts. We have particular strength in the early biotech sector, and I think what we saw in Q3 was a cumulative impact of these deferred projects and layoffs and the continuing extremely tight budget environment. Once again, we're seeing a lot of interest in the products, but the money is just not flowing. We continue to see healthy adoption and really strong acceptance of our QX600 platform. So as we look to the future, if we all believe that these impacts in biopharma are transient, then when we emerge from it, we think we're going to be in a really strong position. And then, of course, we've got competitors who are playing more in the lower-end segments, and we plan to enter there with the QX Continuum platform in 2024. So for sure, the competitive pressure is intensifying, but I think we've got compelling responses. And where we've got leading positions in these segments will continue to do well as and when these markets recover. Great. Thanks for that, Simon. Just a quick follow-up on pricing, and I guess this is across everything in life sciences. How, how-- You know, what's the pricing environment like, and how should we think about that going forward? Yeah, I think that, you know, the environment is still inflationary. As you probably appreciate, on the clinical side, it, you know, tender-driven business, you can only take very modest and periodic price increases, and we do that when we get that opportunity. On life science, you know, there is still inflationary effect, and, you know, we will still look to try and take modest price increases as we move forward, to help offset our inflationary pressures that we're receiving. And, you know, we expect to do. We've done that this year, we expect to do that next year. And I think in the quarter, we've probably got, you know, just over 1 point of price, 1.5 points of price on a net basis. I think that that should at least be a floor. We've seen a mixed impact there. We process chromatography as well. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Thanks. And just, final question, this is for Norm. Just given the recent sell-off in the space and specifically in your stock, you know, how does that change your acquisition strategy, if at all, and would you still consider issuing equity to pursue an acquisition target in this environment? I think that, you know, kind of in light of the recent stock dislocation, I think, you know, we will very much consider continuing our share repurchases as part of our capital allocation strategy, and, and, obviously, at this point, not such a good currency for M&A. I think in fact, you know, you know, while we're, you know, while we do continue to kind of look at opportunities, I think it's probably fair to say that more of our focus over the next several quarters will be centered around, you know, kind of navigating our markets and, and, and our continued operational transformation. Great. Thanks for the time and thanks for the questions, you guys. Ilan, we wish you the best of luck, and it's been a pleasure working with you. Thank you, Conor. Appreciate it. Likewise. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn it back to Edward Chung for further remarks. Thank you for joining today's call. As always, we appreciate your interest, and we look forward to connecting soon. Thanks, operator. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.