Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Baker Hughes Company first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session, and instructions will follow at that time. If anyone should require assisting during the conference, please press star then zero on your touchtone telephone. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Jud Bailey, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin. Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Baker Hughes first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Here with me are our Chairman and CEO, Lorenzo Simonelli, and our CFO, Brian Worrell. The earnings release we issued earlier today can be found at our website at bakerhughes.com. As a reminder, during the course of this conference call, we will provide forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve a number of risks and assumptions. Please review our SEC filings and website for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. As you know, reconciliations of operating income and other GAAP and non-GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release. With that, I will turn the call over to Lorenzo. Thank you, Jud. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. Our first quarter results reflect operating in a very volatile market environment during the first few months of 2022. On the positive side, TPS orders were up over 100% year-over-year, with TPS book-to-bill of 2.2 as the LNG order cycle continues to unfold. We also experienced some challenges in parts of our business due to continued pressures from broader global supply chain constraints, as well as some impact from the recent geopolitical events. As we look ahead to the rest of 2022, we see a favorable oil and gas price backdrop, as well as a dynamic operating environment with perhaps the most challenging supply chain and inflationary environment we have seen in several decades. The recent and unfortunate geopolitical events are amplifying several trends, including broad-based inflation and supply pressure for key materials, commodities and labor. These events are also driving changes on the economic front, where the world is transitioning from an era of strong economic growth to an environment that is more tenuous and likely to feature diverging economic conditions regionally. Despite broader political uncertainty around the world, Baker Hughes is committed to helping deliver energy globally in a safe, clean and reliable manner, while also maintaining our commitment to net zero carbon emissions and leadership in the energy transition. To meet the world's energy needs in a responsible manner, we believe multiple years of spending growth will be required, as well as significant increase in LNG infrastructure investment. While there is some near-term risk on the demand side, we expect global oil and gas supply to remain constrained in the coming years, which should support higher commodity prices and multiple years of spending growth from our customers. Recent geopolitical events have severely constrained what was already a tight global natural gas market and have refocused the world on the importance of energy security, diversity and reliability. As the world reacts to the rapid changes in the global commodity market, governments are prioritizing natural gas and LNG as a key transition and destination fuel. We continue to see a focus on prioritizing LNG from stable, lower cost markets and locations that can provide cleaner LNG. Given the current LNG price environment and the quickly changing dynamics, we believe that global LNG capacity will likely exceed 800 MTPA by the end of this decade to meet growing demand forecast. This compares to the current global installed base of 460 MTPA and projects under construction totaling almost 150 MTPA. In order to be operational by 2030, this additional capacity will need to reach FID by around 2025. Despite the volatile, yet improving medium-term macro environment, Baker Hughes remains focused on executing our strategy, and we continue to drive further optimization across the two core business areas of OFSE and IET. Earlier this year, we created Climate Technology Solutions, or CTS, and Industrial Asset Management, or IAM. The creation of these two groups is critical to accelerating the speed of commercial development across our key growth areas of new energy frontiers and industrials. We continue to make steady progress in developing our Climate Technology Solutions capabilities with recent investments and partnerships in NET Power, HIF Global, and the acquisition of Mosaic Materials, which features a promising direct air capture technology. Mosaic's material science and technical expertise, including their unique metal-organic framework technology, provides Baker Hughes with the potential to efficiently capture low concentrations of CO₂ across a number of applications. NET Power is an emission-free gas to power technology, where Baker Hughes will develop supercritical CO₂ turboexpanders and other critical pumping and compression technology. We will also bring system integration and process knowledge experience to the partnership to help accelerate the market positioning and deployment of NET Power's emission-free and low-cost electric power. HIF Global develops projects in multiple geographies to produce e-fuels by blending green hydrogen and CO₂. Baker Hughes is investing alongside EIG, Porsche, AME, and Gemstone, and will provide compressors, turbines, pumps, valves, and other technology on future projects. We are also discussing how our recently acquired Mosaic Materials DAC technology could be incorporated into these future projects. Overall, we're excited about adding another carbon capture technology to our portfolio and the potential of these two partnerships to open new market opportunities in clean power and low carbon fuels for Baker Hughes. In Industrial Asset Management, we signed an important agreement with Accenture, C3 AI, and Microsoft to collaborate on the build-out of the IAM solutions offering. The partnership will focus on creating and deploying Baker Hughes IAM solutions that use digital technologies to help improve the safety, efficiency, and emissions profile of industrial machines, field equipment, and other physical assets. In addition to advancing our commercial efforts in CTS and IAM, we also remain focused on optimizing our broader organizational structure under the core business areas of OFSE and IET. At the beginning of April, we took some steps to strengthen and better position Oilfield Services to more closely align our products, services, and solutions to the life cycle of the well and ultimately, to what our customers require. OFS will move from a product line-oriented structure to a solutions-focused business centered around well construction, completions, intervention, and measurements, and production solutions. In addition to the organizational changes in OFS, we were pleased to announce an agreement to acquire Altus Intervention, a leading international provider of well intervention services and downhole technology. The acquisition complements OFS' existing portfolio by enhancing our life of well capabilities as operators look to improve efficiencies from mature fields. Maria Claudia and the OFS team are enhancing their operating model to become more competitive, improve the speed of decision-making, and capitalize on growth opportunities in the market. These organizational changes are important steps in the OFS' journey as customers are increasingly asking for integrated offerings and more solutions-oriented outcomes, as well as a continuation of the strong productivity improvements in OFS over the past few years. As we continue to evolve Baker Hughes across the two business areas of OFSE and IET, we expect more meaningful synergy opportunities between TPS and DS. We are also focused on driving better returns in our OFE business, as well as further synergies between OFS and OFE. Now I'll give you an update on each of our segments. In Oilfield Services, activity levels at the start of the year have continued to trend positively in both the international and North American markets. We also see improving visibility for stronger growth in several key areas over the rest of 2022. In the international markets, underlying activity is improving broadly, with particular strength in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. The uncertainty in Russia is an offset. We expect growth in most international markets to continue, with the strongest increases likely to come from the Middle East over the second half of the year and into 2023. Producers in the region are in the early stages of investing in capacity expansion and should help drive a multiyear increase in activity across the region. In North America, drilling and completion activity continues to move solidly higher, with further increases expected over the course of the year. Although current oil and gas prices would normally suggest a stronger increase in activity, the combination of E&P capital discipline and industry shortages in labor and equipment is likely to keep short-term incremental increases more moderate in nature. While we are pleased with the growth in activity and the growing pipeline of work in many regions, underlying operations continue to be impacted by supply chain and inflationary pressures, and most recently, disruption to our operations in Russia. Our OFS team is working extremely hard to offset these headwinds with price increases, sourcing actions, and a global team working to solve logistics constraints. The product line that continues to feel the most supply chain-related pressure is our production chemicals business, where we have taken actions to enhance our sourcing and manufacturing functions. In addition to recently enacting a supply surcharge and changing out some of the leadership in our chemicals business, we are also taking steps to source and produce chemicals closer to key demand hubs with the opening of our production chemicals facility in Singapore later this year and the recently announced JV with Dussur in Saudi Arabia. As we look over the balance of the year, we remain committed to achieving a 20% EBITDA margin by the fourth quarter. Moving to TPS, the first quarter represented a continuation of the successes we achieved in 2021. TPS orders totaled $3 billion for the second consecutive quarter, driven again by strong orders in LNG. We believe that we are at the beginning of another constructive LNG cycle, which is being expedited by the current geopolitical situation, particularly for U.S. LNG projects. Our positive long-term view is also supported by the recent improvements in policy sentiment in certain parts of the world towards natural gas role within the energy transition. The recent EU taxonomy changes to now include natural gas as a transition fuel is an example of this, and the added need to diversify and provide energy security will likely intensify policy efforts. As these market dynamics play out, a number of projects should accelerate, and we now believe that 100 MTPA-150 MTPA of LNG FIDs will be authorized over the next two years, with additional FIDs becoming more likely in 2024 and 2025. Given the strong TPS orders performance in the first quarter, as well as the acceleration in timing for several LNG projects, we now expect TPS orders to increase in 2022 versus 2021. During the first quarter, we were pleased to be awarded a major order to provide an LNG system for the first phase of Venture Global's Plaquemines LNG project. We will be providing 24 modularized compression trains for the first phase of the project, and this award is part of a 70 MTPA master equipment supply agreement. The highly efficient liquefaction train system is modularized, helping to lower construction and operational costs with a plug-and-play approach that enables faster installation and first cargo. This important order builds on an award in the fourth quarter of 2021 for power generation and the electrical distribution equipment for the comprehensive power island system for the Plaquemines project. The Plaquemines order follows a similar contract for VG's Calcasieu Pass LNG terminal in 2019. In 2021, Baker Hughes successfully completed delivery of the ninth and final block for Calcasieu Pass. All shipments were finalized ahead of schedule, an excellent achievement by our team. Calcasieu Pass holds the global record for the fastest construction of a large-scale greenfield LNG project, moving from FID to first LNG in 29 months. Outside of LNG, we booked an award for NovaLT16 turbines, which will run on 100% hydrogen for Air Products' new net zero blue hydrogen energy complex in Edmonton, Alberta. Our collaboration with Air Products will be critical for a net zero future, and this order follows the award we received for advanced compression technology for the NEOM carbon-free green hydrogen project. We were also pleased to be awarded a contract by TERNA to supply gas turbines and compressors that can run on a blend of natural gas and hydrogen for a new compression station for the Greek natural gas transmission system. Baker Hughes will provide three compression trains deploying our NovaLT12 hydrogen-ready gas turbines and PCL compressors with the capability to transport up to 10% hydrogen for this project. The project directly supports the E.U.'s hydrogen strategy goals to accelerate the development of clean hydrogen, ensure its role as a cornerstone of a climate neutral energy system by 2050. These latest hydrogen orders build on Baker Hughes's extensive experience in developing and supplying turbomachinery equipment to compress, transport, and utilize hydrogen. Next, in Oilfield Equipment, we are encouraged to see improving demand trends across the different business areas. Although recent world events impacted first quarter results, we remain disappointed with the overall level of profitability. At a macro level, trends in the subsea and offshore markets continue to improve. In the subsea tree and flexible pipe market, we expect a solid increase in industry awards this year as a firm commodity price outlook supports a growing pipeline of deepwater opportunities in core markets. In our international wellhead business, we also see a positive order outlook across multiple regions, and particularly in the Middle East. In the first quarter, we were awarded a contract in Asia to provide subsea wellheads and subsea production systems, plus related services, including 12 subsea trees for a deepwater gas field. We also achieved our first award in Ivory Coast, where we will supply subsea trees, flexible flow lines, and risers to develop the Baleine deepwater oil field. In Latin America, we were pleased to build on our flexible pipe business success, securing awards for flexible pipe systems and services that will be deployed across a number of key post- salt revitalization programs, enabling increased oil recovery and extending the life of multiple subsea developments. Finally, in Digital Solutions, order activity remains solid with growth across our industrial end markets, as well as improvement in the oil and gas markets. DS continues to be affected by supply chain challenges and electronic shortages, as well as continued inflationary pressures. The team is working tirelessly to manage the situation and navigate the evolving supply chain issues that have been exacerbated by recent events. In the first quarter, we made a number of changes in the DS business as we look to improve the overall performance. We unified our unique sensor business units, Panametrics, Reuter-Stokes, and Druck under one product line, Precision Sensors & Instrumentation, or PSI. As a combined business, PSI will better support potential investment opportunities crucial for the future development and help optimize the unique technology and commercial requirements of each brand. Unifying the businesses will also help drive better cost and operational performance. While we recognize that there is still more work to do, we also continue to make key personnel and operational changes across DS to drive performance, profitability, and return improvements, and to ensure that we have the right team in place to take this business forward. During the quarter, Bently Nevada secured an important contract with a refiner in Brazil. Our ARMS Reliability OnePM solution will support the customer's operations by providing visibility on over 10,000 assets. We will be providing optimal digital strategies to support asset integrity and availability, which will lead to maintenance cost optimization and effectively enable risk management while delivering enhanced performance. Despite some of the challenges this quarter, we are optimistic on the outlook across both of our core business areas and excited about the new energy investments we are making for Baker Hughes. We believe that we are well-positioned to benefit from an extended cyclical recovery in OFSC and longer-term structural growth trends in LNG, new energy, and Industrial Asset Management. Importantly, we expect to generate strong free cash flow as the cycle plays out and remain committed to returning the majority of it back to shareholders. With that, I'll turn the call over to Brian. Thanks, Lorenzo. I'll begin with the total company results and then move into the segment details. Orders for the quarter were $6.8 billion, up 3% sequentially, driven by OFE and TPS, partially offset by a decrease in Digital Solutions and OFS. Year-over-year, orders were up 51%, driven by increases across all four segments. We are particularly pleased with the orders performance in the quarter, especially in TPS, following a strong orders performance in the fourth quarter. Remaining performance obligation was $25.8 billion, up 10% sequentially. Equipment RPO ended at $9.9 billion, up 20% sequentially, and services RPO ended at $15.9 billion, up 4% sequentially. Our total company book-to-bill ratio in the quarter was 1.4, and our equipment book-to-bill ratio in the quarter was 1.9. Revenue for the quarter was $4.8 billion, down 12% sequentially, with declines in all four segments. Year-over-year, revenue was up 1%, driven by increases in OFS and digital solutions, partially offset by decreases in OFE and TPS. Operating income for the quarter was $279 million. Adjusted operating income was $348 million, which excludes $70 million of restructuring, separation, and other charges. Adjusted operating income was down 39% sequentially and up 29% year-over-year. Our adjusted operating income rate for the quarter was 7.2%, down 320 basis points sequentially. Year-over-year, our adjusted operating income rate was up 160 basis points. Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter was $625 million, down 26% sequentially and up 11% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA rate was 12.9%, up 120 basis points year-over-year. As I will expand in a moment, our adjusted operating income and adjusted EBITDA margin rates were impacted by geopolitical events as well as broader global supply chain challenges. Corporate costs were $105 million in the quarter. For the second quarter, we expect corporate costs to be roughly flat compared to the first quarter. Depreciation and amortization expense was $277 million in the quarter. For the second quarter, we expect D&A to be slightly up compared to first quarter levels. Net interest expense was $64 million. Income tax expense in the quarter was $107 million. GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.08. Included in GAAP diluted earnings per share is an $85 million gain from the net change in fair value of our investment in ADNOC Drilling and a $74 million loss from the net change in fair value of our investment in C3 AI. Both are recorded in other non-operating loss. Adjusted earnings per share were $0.15. Turning to the cash flow statement, free cash flow in the quarter was -$105 million. Free cash flow in the quarter was impacted by lower collections from a select number of international customers, which are largely timing-related, as well as a build in inventory as we get ready to execute on our large order backlog. For the second quarter, we expect free cash flow to improve sequentially, primarily driven by higher earnings and stronger collections. We continue to expect free cash flow conversion from adjusted EBITDA to be around 50% for the year, but anticipate the majority of our free cash flow to be generated over the second half of 2022. The quarterly progression should be more in line with what we experienced during 2018 and 2019. In the first quarter, we continued to execute on our share repurchase program, repurchasing 8.1 million Baker Hughes Class A shares for $236 million at an average price of just under $29 per share. As of March 31st 2022, GE's ownership of Baker Hughes Class B shares represented 4% of the total company, down from just over 11% at the end of 2021. GE's overall ownership of Class A and Class B shares was 11.4% at the end of the first quarter, down from 16.2% at the end of 2021. Before I go into the segment results, I will comment on the current situation in Russia and how it currently factors into our broader outlook. Russia represented roughly 4% of total company revenue in the first quarter, and we recently announced that we have halted all new investment in the country. Additionally, sanctions from the U.S., U.K., and the E.U. continue to evolve and are making ongoing operations increasingly complex and significantly more difficult. As a result, we expect erosion of our Russia-related revenues over the course of 2022, particularly in OFS. However, the pace and magnitude of this is difficult to predict given the dynamic nature of the situation. Therefore, there's a range of possible outcomes we are preparing for across our product companies. On broader supply chain, while we did see some areas stabilize in the first quarter, there continues to be pressure on electronics, challenges in logistics, and an evolving understanding of implications due to global and geopolitical uncertainty. We remain focused on being adaptable to deliver for our customers and on our commitments. Now, I will walk you through the segment results in more detail and give you our thoughts on the outlook going forward. In Oilfield Services, the team delivered a solid quarter despite some of the global challenges. OFS revenue in the quarter was $2.5 billion, down 3% sequentially. International revenue was down 7% sequentially, led by declines in the North Sea, Russia-Caspian, the Middle East and Latin America. North America revenue increased 6% sequentially, with solid growth in both North America land and offshore. Operating income in the quarter was $221 million, down 14% sequentially. Operating margin rate was 8.9%, with margins declining 110 basis points sequentially, driven by lower volume, less favorable mix, and continued inflationary pressure in the chemicals business. Year-over-year, margins were up 230 basis points. As we look ahead to the second quarter, underlying macro fundamentals continue to improve, and we expect to see strong growth in both international and North American activity, as well as improvement in pricing. This is likely to be partially offset by weakness in Russia. We estimate that our second quarter revenue should increase sequentially in the mid- to high single-digit range. With this revenue framework, we would expect our margins to increase by approximately 100-200 basis points sequentially. For the full year 2022, we see an improving outlook across most major markets, which is partially tempered by global supply chain and geopolitical factors. In the international market, we expect the continuation of a broad-based recovery with industry-wide activity growth in the low- to mid double digits. In North America, we expect continued activity increases, with the broader market set to experience strong growth in excess of 40%. Given this macro backdrop and some of the headwind considerations I noted earlier, we would expect OFS revenue to increase in the low- to mid double digits. The largest variable to this range is the number of potential outcomes in Russia. Despite this uncertainty, we still expect margin rates to increase throughout the year and continue to target 20% EBITDA margins by the fourth quarter. Moving to oilfield equipment. Orders for the quarter were $739 million, an increase of over 100% or $394 million year-over-year. The strong orders performance was driven by SPS, supported by a large subsea tree contract in Asia, along with growth in flexibles, surface pressure control, and services. As a reminder, we removed subsea drilling systems from consolidated OFE operations when we completed the merger with MHWirth in the fourth quarter of 2021. Revenue was $528 million, down 16% year-over-year, primarily driven by SPS, SPC, and the removal of SDS, partially offset by growth in services and flexibles. Operating loss was $8 million, down $12 million year-over-year, primarily driven by lower volume in the quarter. OFE's lower revenue and operating margin in the quarter were driven by lower equipment backlog conversion in SPS. For the second quarter, we anticipate revenue to be approximately flat to up mid-single-digit sequentially, depending on the timing of backlog conversion. We expect operating income to be around break even or slightly positive. For the full year 2022, we expect a recovery in offshore activity and project awards, which should help drive a solid increase in orders when adjusting for the removal of SDS. We expect OFE revenue to decline double digits, primarily driven by the deconsolidation of SDS and OFE margin rate to be in the low single-digit range. Next, I will cover Turbomachinery. The team delivered another strong quarter with solid execution. Orders in the quarter were $3 billion, up $1.6 billion year-over-year, a new quarterly record for TPS. Equipment orders were up $1.5 billion year-over-year, driven by a significant award to provide an LNG system for the first phase of BG's Plaquemines LNG project in North America. Service orders in the quarter were up 8% year-over-year, primarily driven by growth in contractual and transactional services, partially offset by lower order volumes and upgrades. Revenue for the quarter was $1.3 billion, down 9% versus the prior year. Equipment revenue was down 26%, driven by timing of project execution. Services revenue was up 6% year-over-year, driven by higher volume in upgrades, pumps, and valves. Operating income for TPS was $226 million, up 9% year-over-year. Operating margin was 16.8%, up 280 basis points year-over-year. Margin rates in the first quarter were favorably impacted by higher services mix and strong cost productivity, especially on projects at or near completion. For the second quarter, we expect revenue to be flat to up mid-single digits on a year-over-year basis, driven by higher equipment volume from planned backlog conversion. With this revenue outlook, we expect TPS margin rates to be roughly flat to slightly higher versus the second quarter of 2021, depending on the ultimate mix between equipment and services. For the full year, we expect strong growth in TPS orders versus 2021, driven by increasing LNG awards. We also continue to see a solid pipeline in our onshore-offshore production segment, along with opportunities in pumps, valves, and new energy areas. While we expect very strong growth in orders, revenue growth should likely range between high single digits to low double digits. On the margin side, we continue to expect operating income margin rates to be roughly flat year-over-year in 2022, depending on the mix between services and equipment. As we mentioned last quarter, included in this framework is an expected increase in investments and R&D expenses that relate to our new energy and industrial growth areas. Finally, in Digital Solutions, orders for the quarter were $567 million, up 3% year-over-year. DS continues to see a strengthening market outlook and delivered growth in orders across most end markets. Sequentially, orders were down 6%, driven by typical seasonality. Revenue for the quarter was $474 million, up 1% year-over-year, primarily driven by higher volumes in Precision Sensors and Instrumentation and Waygate, partially offset by lower volume in PPS, Nexus Controls and Bently Nevada. Sequentially, revenue was down 15%, driven by typical seasonality and challenges in the global environment, particularly supply chain. Operating income for the quarter was $15 million, down 38% year-over-year, largely driven by headwinds from electronics shortages, some cost inflation and COVID-19 related lockdowns in China. Sequentially, operating income was down 71%, driven by lower volume. For the second quarter, we expect to see strong sequential revenue growth and operating margin rates back into the mid-single digits. For the full year, following five quarters in a row of positive book-to-bill, we expect solid DS revenue growth as supply chain constraints begin to ease over the second half of the year and backlog conversion improves. With higher volumes, we expect to see strong improvements in DS margins, which should approach high single digits for the total year. Overall, we have navigated a volatile environment during the quarter, delivering strong orders across the company and positioning to execute on our record backlog. Despite very troubling and challenging geopolitical events and broadly stressed global supply chains, we are confident in our ability to adapt and execute as the rest of the year unfolds. With that, I will turn the call back over to Jud. Thanks, Brian. Operator, let's open the call for questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question at this time, please press the star then the one key on your touch-tone telephone. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press the pound key. In consideration of time, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one related follow-up. Now first question coming from the line of James West with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, Lorenzo, Brian. Hey, James. Lorenzo, you have some great detail on the LNG outlook, but I was wondering if we could get a little more color from your conversations specifically with customers as things have clearly changed pretty dramatically in the last, you know, eight or nine weeks as LNG has come into focus here. If you could maybe provide us, you know, what they're saying, what their urgency level is. You know, kind of just a little more detail on how those conversations are going and how accelerated this build-out cycle could be. Yeah, sure, James. I think it's clear the unfolding situation in Europe definitely accelerated the pace of discussions on the next wave of LNG projects aiming to take FID. You know, we'd already started to see market momentum pick up in 2021 as countries set net zero targets and also started to realize the role of natural gas and what it would play in the energy transition. Now, I'd say we're arguably in the early stages in what could be a multi-year reorganizing of the global energy system. With that, it will take time for the LNG landscape to evolve. Based on the discussions with customers, we see a significant step up in a number of customers looking to take earlier FIDs, with also increased long-term supply agreements. We now expect 100 MTPA-150 MTPA to take FID over the next two years, with the potential of more FIDs in 2024 and 2025. As you know, a lot of these projects are in the U.S., so this U.S. should be a big beneficiary as these redrawings of the global energy map. As we look at other places such as the East, Middle East, Mexico, and also Asia, we're seeing increasing interest from customers. I think we're very well-positioned with some interesting concepts around flexibility and also speed to market. With our highly efficient modularized liquefaction train system, which again was emphasized in VG, we're helping to lower construction and operational costs with the plug-and-play approach that enables faster installation. Feeling good about the LNG outlook for a number of years. Sure. No doubt about that. Thanks for that, Lorenzo. Maybe just a quick follow-up from me. You made this investment in April, a few weeks ago, or a week ago with HIF Global to expand, I think, you know, e-fuels. Could you maybe comment on what exactly is going on there, what that market looks like, how you see that playing out? Yeah, sure, James. HIF is a great opportunity, and we're pleased to be involved with this customer, and it's another example of how collaboration can really help to drive the energy transition. HIF Global develops projects to produce e-fuels by blending green hydrogen and CO2. We've invested alongside AME, EIG, Porsche and Gemstone, great partners, to really help HIF continue to develop carbon neutral e-fuel projects in the United States, Chile and Australia. With the small minority investment in this equity round, we'll be providing compressors, turbines, pumps, valves, and other technology on future projects. I think what's interesting here is, again, as you look at electricity-based fuels or e-fuels, they're clean, carbon-neutral fuels produced from renewable green hydrogen and carbon dioxide taken from the atmosphere, and they can be used by existing cars and trucks without any modification to the engines. E-fuels require no new infrastructure, transportation, or filling stations. A good opportunity and an expanding market for us. Got it. Thanks, Lorenzo. Our next question coming from the line of Chase Mulvehill with Bank of America. Your line is open. Yeah, good morning, everyone. Hey, Chase. Hi, Chase. Hey, Brian. Hey, Lorenzo. I guess, you know, kind of a follow-up question on James', you know, question around LNG and, you know, obviously you've taken up your guidance for LNG, or for TPS orders this year based on strong LNG. You've been guiding flat, you know, now you expect kind of strong order growth momentum. I don't know if you'd want to kind of quantify, you know, what strong means. Then, you know, we kind of all understand, you know, what's happening in LNG and the accelerated growth opportunities here, but maybe a step back a little bit and talk about, you know, your upstream onshore/offshore order opportunities because it ultimately looks like the base orders related to kind of some of the onshore/offshore stuff has taken a step higher as well. Yeah, Chase, on TPS, again, we're seeing a continued order momentum that we saw start at the end of 2021, and it's really accelerated in 2022, primarily driven by LNG, also the new energy opportunities, even though they're smaller in nature. When you look at, you know, the LNG projects that are moving forward, as I mentioned before, and you think about the likely timing, it could translate in an order number for TPS of $8 billion-$9 billion in 2022. Importantly, based on customer discussions, we'd expect our order levels to remain elevated in 2023 as well. As you can see, you know, a lot of this on the LNG projects is a pull forward and also strong long-term LNG fundamentals. We also see a continued traction in the new energy space. As you saw, again, in the first quarter, we booked some awards on the new energy space, and we're still at the upper end of our 100-200 range as we continue to see new energy orders in 2022. Okay. All right. That's helpful there. Nice to hear strong orders that are gonna continue into 2023 for TPS. The follow-up is really, you know, obviously the Russia-Ukraine conflict is causing, you know, Europe and other countries to focus on energy security. Obviously this is positive, you know, in the LNG front, but what does this ultimately mean for the energy transition? You know, do you think that it actually slows the pace of adoption? Does it speed it up? Like, what does it mean for, you know, energy transition? Yeah, Chase, it's a question that many are posing, and I think the focus right now in the near term has switched to energy security, reliability, and diversity. We don't believe that sustainability goes away. In fact, if you look at some of the policies even introduced in Germany, their 2035 energy plan still continues to focus on sustainability. We think the current environment will actually accelerate clean energy initiatives, particularly for fuels like hydrogen, which E.U. is making a large part of its long-term energy plan. What we're seeing from the current situation is that you cannot become too reliant on one country or one source of energy, so diversity of supply is critical. We think that pragmatism has come back into this discussion and the role of energy, not just renewables, but also as we've mentioned before, gas playing a key critical role. Given the elevated commodity prices, a number of major oil companies and NOCs are gonna report good profits and free cash flow. We think they'll use this to continue actually developing and accelerating their decarbonization plans as well as healthy shareholder returns. You can see that also with an example like Aramco with its CapEx plans that includes significant hydrogen. You know, we think Baker Hughes is very well positioned and with gas, LNG, hydrogen, CCUS, oil, and pipelines, and we've got the technologies that are gonna continue to drive this transition. All righty. Perfect. Thanks, Lorenzo. Thanks. Our next question coming from the line of Connor Lynagh with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Thanks. I was hoping maybe we could talk a little bit more about Russia. Just wanted to understand first off the data point on the 4% of revenues. Is that already fully accounting for any ruble depreciation impacts? Is what you're basically guiding to, you know, actual activity declines. I'm curious, you know, further to that, is it at this point you have received notification from your customers that your activity will decline, or is that just your expectation based on what you're seeing in the market? Yeah, Connor, to hit the first part, this does, you know, include the impact of what was going on, you know, with the ruble. As you know, that's it. It's been down and up again and is relatively stable at this point in time. You know, you hit it. It represented roughly about 4% of revenues in the first quarter. Look, I'd say in terms of how we're thinking about it, you know, for the full year, you gotta take a step back and you know, realize that sanctions from the U.S., U.K., and E.U. continue to evolve and are evolving and are making ongoing operations increasingly complex. A bit more difficult. Kinda to give you some perspective on the first quarter, we did see some decremental impact on EBITDA, about the same level on EBITDA as that Russia represented in terms of our revenue of the total company. It was really driven from you know lower volumes from not being able to move people and assets into the country. I'd say there were also some logistical delays and delivery challenges which largely impacted OFE in both equipment and services. We also saw some logistical delays and delivery challenges in TPS, primarily in services as well. Those were the two areas that we saw the most significant impact in the quarter from Russia. If you take a step back and look at what we talked about going forward and kinda the framework that we tried to provide you for the year, we did contemplate everything that we know today and the anticipation that things are gonna continue to evolve there. Based on what we talked about in terms of the revenue outlook for OFS, you know, low to mid double digits, the low end really assumes that our OFS Russia operation declines over the course of the year to basically an immaterial level. By the end of the year, really low there. We do have inventory in the country but, you know, given the sanctions, are unable to import key technologies for some of the services. There'll be a drop-off over the course of the year barring something unforeseen, and there'll be some impacts in TPS associated with that. Look, as we get more clarity on the situation, we'll clearly react and take the appropriate cost actions to offsetting any declines in volume, which we also included in the framework that we provided you. You know, as you think about Russia and the impact on the global environment, we're obviously working through supply chain challenges that come with things coming out of Russia and Ukraine or not, as the case may be. Kinda you gotta take a look too. There's gonna be some offsetting activity increase to soak up the supply, you know, to meet the demand that goes away from, you know, potential declines in Russian output. As you know, that's not gonna be one for one in terms of timing. We are seeing increased activity in North America. You've seen increased plans, particularly in the Middle East, to invest more, to bring more supply to market. We will see some impacts from that, but there's likely to be a delay, versus the impact you see in Russia. Yeah, thanks for all that color. The last portion you were talking about there was my follow-up. Basically, at this point, have you seen any of your major international customers alter plans or accelerate plans or indicate that they're planning to accelerate? Certainly it seems like there is going to be some loss of Russian oil volumes to the market. I'm curious how some of these bigger companies are going to respond to that. Yeah, you know, yes, we are seeing customers talk about increasing their spend plans. I'd say particularly we've seen that in the Middle East, and have started to see awards increase, and I think you'll start to see some of that flow through here in the second half of the year and into 2023. Obviously, we talked about the outlook in North America. That's clearly reaction to what's going on in the market and what's happening in Russia. Look, you know, Lorenzo talked about what we're seeing in TPS orders, you know, for the year. The situation has certainly had an impact on that. Ironically, a little bit, Connor, as I look at you know everything we're seeing right now, 2023 is shaping up with some pretty good visibility, you know, maybe even a little better than 2022 because of the volatility right now. You know, with the backlog that we're building on the back of potentially $8 billion-$9 billion of orders in TPS with some service tailwinds, you saw service orders up in TPS 8% this quarter with strong returns and cash flow with a lot of operators. I think you're likely to see that continue. You know, we talked about what you're seeing in the upstream space, and I talked about that timing disconnect and things coming in later. I think 2023 is shaping up with pretty good visibility and is looking to be pretty strong based on what we're seeing today. Look, we'll manage through the volatility in 2022, but I think we're positioning things to be able to take advantage of the broader context of things going on in the marketplace across the portfolio. Got it. Thanks very much. Our next question coming from the line of Scott Gruber with Citigroup. Your line is open. Yes, thanks. Just building upon Connor's last question there. It sounds like the visibility into 2023 is improving. You know, what's the potential for the international OFS market to actually see an acceleration in spending in 2023, given the fact that, you know, budgets for this year were set, you know, before the surge in oil prices? Some additional color, if you will, on, you know, longer cycle projects, you know, building in the queue to support growth in 2023 and beyond. Yeah, Scott, just on OFS, international outlook. Based on the conversations with our customers, we expect a broad-based recovery internationally with all major geographies and overall international growth in the low- to mid-teens%. We believe, Middle East could be one of the strongest markets in 2022 and is likely in the early stages of a growth cycle as the NOCs in the region look to add production capacity on a gradual long-term basis. Good outlook going into 2023 as well. We also expect to see another strong year of growth in Latin America, led by Brazil and Mexico. As we go forward, we would expect North Sea and Asia Pacific to see solid growth in 2022, and not as strong as Middle East or Latin America, but solid growth. Lastly, West Africa is also seeing some i ncremental activity and strong growth as we go forward. I think on the offshore side, you know, we'd say at a macro level, the trends in the subsea and offshore markets continue to improve. As you look at our first quarter as well from an orders perspective, you can see that. In the subsea tree and flexible pipe market, we expect to see a solid increase in industry awards this year and see it coming back for around the foreseeable future. Got it. With some of the international operators pulling forward some projects and responding to oil prices, can you provide some color on the pricing trends you're seeing on the international side of the OFS market? I imagine things are getting better, but do you foresee sufficient momentum there to propel above normal incrementals in 2023 and continue to extend your margins, you know, beyond the 20% threshold? Yeah, Scott, generally speaking, we're starting to get good pricing leverage and getting net pricing, particularly in North America, but also in some of the international markets. Right now it varies by market, but we're having more success and better discussions around higher pricing levels. Yeah. Look, I'd say particularly, you know, from an OFS perspective, as the chemicals business recovers, I would expect to see some improvement in incrementals there. Then, you know, the only thing I would say, Scott, is, you know, we're all dealing with inflation in the market and, you know, we're working hard to get surcharges in and price increases in, but that's something you gotta take into consideration as you think about the next, you know, 12 months or so. Thanks. Appreciate the color. Our next question coming from the line of Arun Jayaram with JPMorgan Chase. Your line is open. Yeah, good morning. You booked Plaquemines, the LNG system this quarter, with Venture Global. I believe Calcasieu Pass was booked in the third quarter of 2019. I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about the margin potential of this project relative to Calcasieu Pass. Obviously a much more challenging supply chain and inflationary environment, and what are you doing in order to protect your margins from those inflationary pressures? Yeah, Arun, look, we're very pleased that, you know, we've gotten the second phase of, you know, our work with VG here with Plaquemines. Look, I think it's fair to assume that, you know, margins will be similar to what we saw on Calcasieu. I mean, there's a couple things going on here. Obviously, we've got experience with this type of project with this customer before, so there's some natural synergies that come through in this project that we didn't have in the first one. You did mention inflation there. Obviously, we've priced that in, and, you know, have worked on productivity to help offset that as well. Look, you can imagine, as we've said before, you know, when we quote and when we win orders, we go out and we place, you know, orders for long lead items. We certainly have a view of what we believe is happening in the market today and what will happen and take the appropriate actions to protect ourselves and the customer from that inflation as much as possible. Look, this is a great order for us. You know, it's similar to what we did with Calcasieu. You heard Lorenzo talk about, you know, we delivered all these modules ahead of schedule, which was very helpful for VG getting to first cargo in record time. Our track record here is pretty good, and we're really excited about this space and this order and our partnership with VG. Great. I just had a follow-up. I think you delivered Calcasieu Pass in less than 30 months or so, which is, you know, very impressive. One of the questions we've been getting from clients is given, you know, what's going on in LNG is this Fast LNG concept, which is offshore. You know, these are generally a third of the size of some of the, you know, the onshore facilities. But can you talk a little bit about that? Does Baker have a toolkit that can participate in the offshore LNG market? You know, how do you see this playing out? And is this a sandbox you'd wanna play in? Arun, I think, you know well we have capability and capacity to handle many different types of LNG equipment orders. At the same time, we've got great capability in our facilities. As you look at the 30 years we've been in LNG, we've always been looking at new technologies to reduce the cycle time and also to plug and play. This new modularized approach to Fast LNG can be applied both to onshore and offshore, and the number of customer discussions are intensifying around this speed to market. I think, again, with the technology enhancements we've made, we're well positioned to capture the market here. Great. Thanks a lot. Our next question coming from the line of Stephen Gengaro with Stifel. Your line is open. Thanks. Good morning, gentlemen. Morning. Good morning. Do you mind going back to your prepared comments on the Oilfield Services side and some of the changes you've made there? Can you talk about, you know, sort of the path to 20% EBITDA margins by the end of the year and maybe with some color around the impact of some of these changes you've made? Yeah. You know, look, I'd say overall, we still feel confident, Stephen, in hitting our margin target rates and getting OFS to a 20% EBITDA margin rate, you know, on a consistent basis. I'd say from here, you know, there's a couple things that should drive margin improvement. The biggest driver will be better profitability in our chemicals business, which as you know has been squeezed by higher input costs, higher logistics and shipping costs and some raw material shortages. You know, as Lorenzo mentioned, we put in pricing increases and surcharges to help offset that. You know, chemicals had about a 170 basis point drag on OFS margins in the first quarter. You know, look, you know, normalization of broader logistics and supply chain issues that have disrupted shipment schedules here in the quarter should also help with that. These two issues, if you combine with the volume improvement that we're expecting, should be enough to get us to the 20% level. In addition, you know, we're set to bring on new chemical plants in Singapore and Saudi in 2022 and 2023, which will lower the cost for chemicals, get us closer to some of our customers and give us some advantages for our Eastern Hemisphere delivery. You know, we're also continuing to work other productivity initiatives with Maria Claudia and the team, primarily around service delivery with our remote operations continuing to drive margin improvements there. We have been executing on, you know, supply chain rationalization, as well as, you know, sourcing from some lower cost countries, and that's been part of a multiyear plan. We've got a lot of things that we have been working and are continuing to work to get the margin rates to that 20% level. As I said, you know, sort of broader supply chain and logistics and normalization of the chemicals margins, which we think have troughed here in the first quarter, will get us there, and then there should be some icing on top. Stephen, just to add, the new organization that we announced is gonna improve the speed of decision-making and also be able to capitalize on the growth opportunities in the market. It's very much customer focused and allows us to be more responsive and more comprehensive in our integrated solutions and capture more of the market share of operating costs related to spend. It's what our customers have been asking for and we're delivering. Thanks. As a quick follow-up, on the chemicals on the supply chain side, I mean, clearly Russia kind of disrupted what looked like, I think, a stabilization. What's your visibility and sort of confidence that things will sort of start to normalize here as you get into the second half of the year? Yeah, look, I'd say, you know, we started to see some encouraging signs in you know in the latter part of the fourth quarter as you know chemical prices started to stabilize and logistics started to look a bit better. Obviously, with everything going on in Russia and the increase in commodity prices, that's created some more headwinds. We have seen stabilization in the broader you know base chemical space. I'd say where inflation is still tough is in the specialty chemical market. You know, as I mentioned, we had some unique issues with a supplier who had a facility that was basically shut down, and getting that facility back up and running has taken them a bit longer, so we've been having to get some alternative supply. That's starting to normalize as well, so we should see some recoveries come through. Look, we've made some changes. We recently changed out leadership in chemicals. We're doing some specific things in supply chain to deal with the current environment. We've broadened our sourcing relationships just given what we experienced with this large supplier that we had. We've actually taken a look and have eliminated some products where, you know, volumes were low and margins were relatively low to free up the capability to focus on some areas where we make more money and deal with some of the supply chain challenges and focus the team there. Then, you know, with the new factories coming on, it's allowed us an opportunity to take a step back and look at the overall supply base, how we're contracting, and we've made some changes there that we should start to see come through here in the second half. You know, good visibility to what's going on there. The team understands it. Just working through, you know, a little bit of a perfect storm here that seems to be abating. Very good. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of David Anderson with Barclays. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, Lorenzo. Question on the global push to build out LNG capacity. I had heard anecdotally it was a minimum of four years to bring a new train on start to finish. You're talking about Plaquemines and closer to 29 months because of its modular design. Is this the new standard that we should be thinking about these projects? And I guess related to that, is there a limit to how much equipment you can provide in a given year, in terms of your manufacturing capacity if these projects are accelerated? Yeah, Dave, I think you have to go back to the tenure we've had in the LNG cycle, and we've always said that there's gonna be small scale, mid scale, large scale, and we're gonna be participating in all of those and also looking at modular as well as stick build. Depending on the customer's needs, we're gonna be providing them. Clearly, the modular is faster to market. It is a plug-and-play model, so we're seeing increased interest from some of the independent players, and I'd say also within North America. Globally, with some of the larger projects, they still continue on the stick build. We don't have a challenge on capacity. Again, we've had big flows of LNG projects in the past, and we feel good about being able to manage it. Our facilities that are set up in Florence and Massa and Avenza in Italy are well prepared for the LNG project wave. If we think about the U.S. build-out of export capacity, are there any other kind of areas where you think there are bottlenecks that need to be freed up? Would you expect most of the awards going forward to be in this modular category? Just curious how you think about that kind of supply chain. You're just one part of it, of course. I'm just wondering, looking at the rest of that, are there other areas that are at bottlenecks that could either speed up or slow down these projects? I think the area that people are looking at and also reacting to is on the EPC side. That's one of the areas that I think is a focus right now. I'd say also the modular approach reduces some of the dependence on the full aspect of EPCs, and so it's a faster approach from that perspective. Labor continues to be constrained, and so that's something that's being looked at. Great. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Roger Read with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Yeah, thank you. Good morning. How are you? Good. Hey, Roger. Just a couple of quick questions. The first one is, you've made the comment about supply chain, you know, easing up as the year goes on, and I understand chemical is a little different than some of the others. As we think of some of the pieces that will go into these LNG orders, some of the issues going over in China, is there any risk of that affecting [audio distortion]. Hey, Roger, I'll go ahead. You cut off there a little bit, but, you know, on. Sorry. That's all right. On supply chain, it tends to be, you know, challenging and obviously, with everything going on in the global, you know, geopolitical space, it's been a little more challenging. Look, I'd say from how it impacts us and how we're dealing with it, we're managing, you know, the price increases in various metals like copper and steel and nickel. There's no supply issue. It's just managing through those pricing. You can imagine that that's going into our quotes. To deal with all of this, we have taken down the, you know, timing and validity of our quotes to be able to deal with this, so customers know what's going on, and they can have good visibility into what the cost of these projects are gonna be. Look, from a castings and forging standpoint, still able to get, you know, supply. We're dealing with some, you know, scarcity in Europe and higher pricing there. We're seeing, you know, what we're doing with our customers, our suppliers are doing as well with, you know, quotes are only valid for, you know, a shorter period of time, given the raw material pricing and the unique energy challenges in Europe. Look, that's the beauty of being part of a global company like Baker Hughes. I mean, we've been able to shift supply into China. We focused on Northwest China to be able to deal with some of the port issues and things we're seeing in COVID. We had really good experience there. We've also moved some supply to Mexico and India. We are able to pivot because we've got a large supply base and can direct that demand to, you know, to different places. We feel good about what we're doing there on supply chain. We expect to see some stabilization come through, but have a great sourcing team, you know, working with the projects team to make sure we can fulfill on the demand that we see coming through. From a logistics standpoint, I'd say the team has done an outstanding job of managing that. Our inflation we've seen in logistics is well below the headline, you know, prices that you've seen. We've changed, you know, ports that we're using in North America and China. We've been incredibly reactive here. I don't see it being a big constraint today for the LNG cycle that we're seeing, but that's something that we'll have to watch as it evolves. Okay, great. Thanks. The follow-up, as we think about just, you know, we had one of your competitors yesterday talk about exceptional tightness in North America. I was just curious your view on availability and of equipment, labor, et cetera, as we think about the international markets ramping up, and at what point you would see, you know, significant tightness really helping out on the pricing side there. I understand things should get better as this year goes along, given the guidance, but, you know, where we could see things get very, very good on the OFS and OFE sides. Yeah. Look, I'd say broadly, tightness you're seeing outside of the U.S., it's similar to what you're seeing inside of North America. You know, some labor tightness, you know, around the globe in some markets, not as much as you're seeing in North America. Look, just given the overall increase in activity, you are seeing tightness in supply of equipment. I think we've all got capability, or I know we've got capability to ramp up and have been planning on that. But look, when you've got demand up as much as you're seeing in North America and globally, general economic tendencies come back into play and you start to see the ability to, you know, have more constructive pricing discussions, deal with, you know, some of those supply demand issues. I'd say, you know, the international market, as you know, is more, you know, longer term contract base versus spot market like you see in North America. Where you see some, you know, real opportunity here is on some of that spot business. I'd say we're being very constructive with our customers, taking into account what we're seeing on the supply chain, what we're seeing in overall demand. You know, it's a constructive backdrop for OFS at the moment. Great. Thank you. I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Lorenzo Simonelli for any closing remarks. Yeah. Thank you very much, and thank you to everyone for joining our earnings call today. Just before we end the call, wanted to leave you with some closing thoughts. Despite some of the challenges this quarter, we are optimistic on the outlook across both of our core business areas and excited about the new energy investments we're making for Baker Hughes. We believe that our upstream oil and gas businesses are poised to capitalize on a strong multi-year recovery, while our industrial businesses are poised to benefit from a strong LNG cycle, growth in new energy orders, and the development of our Industrial Asset Management capabilities. While we benefit from these macro tailwinds, we expect to generate strong free cash flow and return 60%-80% of it back to shareholders. Thanks for taking the time. Look forward to speaking to you all again soon. Operator, you may close out the call. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our conference for today. Thank you for participating in today's conference. You may all disconnect.