Good day, everyone, welcome to today's Black Stone Minerals Q4 and earnings release conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, you will have the opportunity to ask questions during the question-and-answer session. You may register to ask a question at any time by pressing the star one on your touch-tone phone. You may withdraw yourself from the queue by pressing star two. Please note this call may be recorded. I will be standing by if you should need any assistance. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Steve Putman. Thank you. Good morning to everyone. Thank you for joining us either by phone or online for Black Stone's Q4 and full year 2022 earnings conference call. Today's call is being recorded and will be available on our website along with the earnings release, which was issued last night. Before we start, I'd like to advise you that we will be making forward-looking statements during this call about our plans, expectations, and assumptions regarding our future performance. These statements involve risks that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. For a discussion of these risks, you should refer to our cautionary information about forward-looking statements in our press release from yesterday and the Risk Factors section of our 2022 10-K that we expect to file later today. We may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful in evaluating our performance. Reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and other information about these non-GAAP metrics are described in our earnings press release from yesterday, which can be found on our website at blackstoneminerals.com. Joining me on the call from the company are Tom Carter, Chairman and CEO, Carrie Clark, Senior Vice President, Land and Commercial, Evan Kiefer, Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations, Garrett Gramignan, Vice President of Engineering and Geology, and Thad Montgomery, Vice President of Land. I'll now turn the call over to Tom. Thank you, Steve. Good morning to everyone on the call. Thanks for joining us today to discuss our Q4 and full year 2022 results. We posted a very strong quarter across the board and in fact set new records in production and cash flow. We generated total production volumes for the quarter of 42,000 BOE per day, an increase of 5% over our Q3 volumes. That increase was driven by higher royalty volumes, which totaled 40,000 BOE per day, up 7% from the last quarter and the highest level of royalty production in our history. Oil volumes trended up in the Bakken and the Midland Delaware plays, while the increase in natural gas volumes primarily came from the Shelby Trough Haynesville Bossier position, where our operating partner, Aethon, has four rigs on location and where we had a large contribution from overrides associated with our farmed out working interests in the play. These overrides contributed 2.8 thousand BOE per day of volumes in the quarter that cover multiple months of production. We also saw a step-up in volume from our Austin Chalk acreage. Both of these are strong examples of our potential in our organic growth efforts, where we attract operators onto our existing concentrated acreage positions through creative incentive structures and maximize the value of our retained interest through farm-outs with third-party capital providers. To date, 14 wells have been turned to sales in the Shelby Trough under our development agreement with Aethon, and another 16 are in various stages of drilling or completion. In addition, 18 new-generation multi-stage completion wells have been turned to sales in our concentrated acreage position in the East Texas Austin Chalk. The goal is to accelerate production where it matters the most while shielding Black Stone Minerals from any meaningful capital requirements. That strategy paid dividends in the Q4, and we expect that to continue into future years as well. Our record results came against a healthy overall environment for our producers. Realized prices for the Q4 were approximately $85 a barrel and $6.50 per MMBtu for gas, both down relative in the last couple of quarters, but clearly high enough to encourage continued development activity. We had 108 rigs operating across our acreage at December 31st. That's an increase of 17% relative to where we were at the end of the Q3, and it's 14% higher than we saw at the end of 2021. Since 2020, we've averaged 10%-15% of the active rigs in the lower 48 on our acreage and, with our organic initiatives, continue working on attracting more capital and development activity going forward. The record royalty volumes and favorable commodity price environment combined to generate the highest single quarter cash flow for Black Stone Minerals as a public company. We reported Adjusted EBITDA of $131 million and Distributable Cash Flow of $125 million for the Q4, both up 7%-8% from the Q3. Most importantly, these record results and our confidence in our outlook for 2023 led to the 5th consecutive distribution increase, with Q4 distributions of $0.475 per unit that we announced earlier this month. This also establishes a new high watermark for Black Stone Minerals. It was a great quarter, and we have a lot of positive momentum going into 2023. I'm sure many of you saw our announcement last week that Jeff Wood is stepping down as President and Chief Financial Officer, effective next week. We really appreciate Jeff's contribution to Black Stone Minerals over his six years with us, and we sure wish him the best in his future endeavors. Evan Kiefer, who has been at Black Stone Minerals for nine years and currently serves as VP of Finance and Investor Relations, will step into the CFO role. We're fortunate to have Evan and his expertise and deep knowledge of the company. I am very confident the CEO-CFO transition will be seamless. With that, I'll turn it over to Evan to walk through the details of the quarter and discuss our 2023 guidance. Perfect. Thank you, Tom. Good morning to everyone. Since joining the company in late 2013, I've supported the IPO process, I've seen the Shelby Trough transition through multiple operators into the program that has grown into today, and worked alongside our team through many other strategic projects. I'm very excited to step into the CFO role and what this company will achieve through our continued efforts to develop our existing asset base. As Tom mentioned, it was a record-setting quarter in terms of royalty production, Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow, and distributions paid. We've accomplished all of this despite working interest volumes continuing to trend down, which was by design through various farm-out agreements that we started back in 2017, and $41 million of realized hedge losses for the quarter. For the full year, we generated $771 million of oil and gas revenues, which was up 57% over 2021 levels, and $466 million of Adjusted EBITDA from 37.1 thousand BOE a day of total production for the year. We paid out a total distribution of $1.75 per unit for 2022, which is an increase of 85% over 2021 levels. We retained approximately $75 million for debt repayment throughout the year as well. In conjunction with that, the earnings release that we put out our 2023 guidance yesterday, as we look forward to the full year 2023, we forecast annual royalty production to be up slightly from 2022 levels, with the majority of those gains coming from our key organic growth plays. We expect to see production growth in the Shelby Trough as Aethon continues to ramp up development activity, targeting a minimum pace of 27 wells per year by the end of this year, as well as higher volumes in the East Texas Austin Chalk as we work with our operating partners there to accelerate activity. We have had 24 new generation multi-stage completion wells spud in the Austin Chalk, with 18 of those that are currently producing. We also expect production growth from our Permian and Bakken positions, where we have visibility into some high-interest development locations. This is partially offset by a slowdown in Louisiana Haynesville after a very robust 2022 and some natural production declines on our acreage outside of these core plays. We mentioned last year that we expected to grow production through 2023 with an exited target rate of close to 40,000 BOE per day. Despite the recent pullback in natural gas prices, our expectations are to be at or above that level by the end of this year, which will be driven largely in part from our development agreements with our key operators in the Shelby Trough and Austin Chalk. We expect lease bonus, operating expenses, and production costs to be roughly in line with 2022 levels. G&A is also expected to increase slightly in 2023 as a result of inflationary costs and selective hires to support our ability to evaluate, market, and manage our undeveloped acreage position to potential operators. While we don't normally give specific cash flow guidance, I will note that strike prices on our natural gas swaps increased from approximately $3 per MMBtu in 2022 to over $5 per MMBtu in 2023, an increase of over 60%. The average strike price of our oil hedges increased by over 20% from approximately $65 per barrel in 2022 to over $80 per barrel in 2023. We are in our normal range of hedging approximately 60% of our estimated volumes for the rest of this year. That will provide a great deal of support to our cash flows in 2023, even with the recent pullback in pricing. Speaking of hedges, we've started the 2024 natural gas position in the recent weeks to protect against what could be a difficult period in gas prices in advance of increasing LNG exports in 2025. We currently have hedges covering approximately 15 Bcf of natural gas production for the full year of 2024, with an average strike price of $3.67. We will remain consistent with our hedge program, continuing to build the 2024 position throughout this year, targeting 70%+ of our estimated volumes by the end of the year. Even with the distribution increase, we generated distribution coverage of 1.26x for the Q4, which further strengthened our already solid balance sheet. We had a total debt of $10 million at the end of the year and currently have $57 million net cash position in advance of paying the Q4 distribution. This has all been very positive for Black Stone Minerals, and we have been able to grow our royalty production through organic efforts without incurring debt or issuing new equity for acquisitions. We are very well positioned to continue this trend into 2023 and offer a compelling value proposition to new and existing investors with virtually no debt and a distribution which we believe is sustainable in 2023 that delivers a yield of over 12% to our current unit price. With that, we'll open the call to any questions. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one on your touchtone phone. You may remove yourself from the queue by pressing star and two. Once again, to ask a question, please press the star and one. We'll take our first question from Derrick Whitfield with Stifel. Your line is open. Good morning, all, and congrats to you, Evan, on your promotion. Thank you, Derrick, and good morning. For my first question, I wanted to focus on your 2023 guidance. With the lower gas prices we're observing at present, how are you thinking about the conversion of DUCs to production in your guidance? Yeah, Derrick, that's a great question, and obviously, you know, gas prices have pulled back pretty significantly since the middle of December. We do see it as a challenged market going into this year and what we see going forward. One thing I will point to that we do have a lot of visibility into is really the Aethon agreement through the Shelby trough. That's set by a minimum development pace through those contracts. We do have some visibility there, as well as some of the development agreements that we have also in the Austin Chalk. Now we do think there's going to be a decrease in our overall Haynesville, Louisiana volume compared to what we saw in 22 because of the prices. We even saw the Comstock announce that they're laying down two rigs. We do expect it to be a little bit of a challenged year with slightly lower volumes on the gas side in the Louisiana Haynesville this year. Terrific. Maybe shifting over to the Austin Chalk, since there were no, I guess, material updates in your press release, I wanted to see if you could offer some perspective on 2023 as it relates to your general expectations for activity, and if there are any specific developments we should place on our radar. Overall, everything out there is still going forward as we expect. I mentioned in my commentary that we have 24 wells have been spud, 18 of them are online. That leaves six wells currently that have been spud that are coming online here very soon. We do think kind of for the remainder of the year, there's potential for an additional 8-10 wells to be drilled out there this year with further development going forward. Overall, kind of our view is that even with kind of gas prices pulling back, it's still a very economic and very attractive returns to operators out there. We're excited with working with the existing operators that we have and potentially new ones, that we can bring to the acreage going forward, to continue to develop the, at the pace that we would like. We overall still see within the fairway approximately 250-plus remaining locations out there at current prices. We do see a lot of runway, a lot of potential activity that we can drive on this position going forward. I'll just add to that while the Chalk play generally over time has had a fair amount of variability in it, and this Brooklyn redevelopment is still in its early stages. The last two wells that have been drilled in what we call the core of the core are outstanding wells, one of them producing over 1,500 barrels of oil a day and 12 million cubic feet of gas over the last 30 days. That's terrific. Great update, guys. Yeah. Thank you, Derrick. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one. We'll go next to Tim Rezvan with KeyBanc. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, everybody, and congratulations, Evan, on the promotion. Yeah. Thank you, Tim. I'll pick on you first. I've asked you repeatedly in the past about the distribution level and as you showed in the report, you know, you continue to have, you know, de minimis debt and leverage. How do you think about, you know, it was 79, call it 80% distribution in this quarter? How do you think about that rate going forward and why wouldn't you kind of increase it, you know, given that debt you have? Yeah. I'll just start off by saying, you know, when we look at the distribution and our internal policy as far as trying to establish what we wanna set that at going forward, is that we'll look forward to the next 12-24 months at, you know, overall general activity in the sector, pricing trends and everything else, and try to establish what we think is a reasonable distribution that can be maintained over the forward quarters. We like the idea of having a stable to growing distribution, which is what we've done over the last, you know, five quarters, where we've been able to slowly increase that as prices and production has improved. Looking at the Q4 with increasing it, again, to $0.475, it's something that we feel is fairly stable and achievable throughout this year, despite some of the pricing pullback, while able to, you know, at this point, have all of our debt significantly paid off. Obviously, that'll increase whenever the distribution gets paid out, from $57 million today and go back up, you know, call it around the $50 million mark going forward. It's really a product of looking at what we see the guidance going forward and trying to set a distribution that we feel very comfortable and achievable going forward despite some volatility in overall pricing. Okay. That's helpful context. Then, if I could switch gears a bit, it's been a fairly active, you know, M&A period for most of the public minerals companies. Black Stone Minerals has been an outlier, seems to be focused on the overrides, you know, that you can do to increase activity. What are your thoughts on that? Are you not at all looking at M&A? Is it more that you haven't liked the prices you see? You know, again, with the balance sheet you have, you certainly can support some inorganic growth. Just kinda curious how management and the board is thinking about that. Tim, this is Tom. I'll answer that. You know, historically, for a long time, we've been an acquisition company. Our feeling today is that the market is very competitive in that arena, and we really look at the efficiency of that source of production relative to the cash flow per share or production per share. It is challenging to find things of size and pricing levels that we feel are competitive with what we can do on our own properties. Your question earlier around our coverage, if you will, We may be a little bit different from others. We don't have any problem whatsoever with building up a fair amount of liquidity on our balance sheet because we've got things that we can do with it over the near next 24 months. If an acquisition that we just had to have because it was very well priced, we'd be in a really great position to do that. You know, we're currently trading our stock is trading at a 12% yield, and it's hard, in our opinion, to buy things that have a 12% internal rate of return when our equity is trading at a 12% yield. It's just not that compelling. That doesn't mean we won't ever do it again, but we don't see it as an efficient way for us to grow because we don't wanna lever our balance sheet up a lot. With the way our units are trading, it's a challenge. Okay. I appreciate that color. If I could sneak one last one in, just to circle back to the Haynesville. You talked about the, you know, the Aethon agreements that you have in place. How confident are you that those agreements will hold if we were to see gas prices kinda gap down? I don't know if you know or can share any details on maybe hedges that they have in place or kinda what assurances you have that they would honor that if we see a worst-case scenario for gas? Yeah. Tim, this is Evan. I'll start with that. You know, one of the biggest points that I'll mark to, and I can't really comment too much on Aethon hedge position and everything just because we typically don't have those conversations with them. You know, when we originally struck the deal with Aethon, in Angelina County was May of 2020 when prices were sub $2 at the time. We kinda set up this program with them to be interesting to them at those price environments, and so where we still see economics on these wells being very attractive to them going forward. Obviously there will probably be a threshold to where, you know, it dips below that. At current prices and, you know, current levels, as we said, negotiating those deals at sub $2 pricing gives us a lot of leeway and confidence into that program going forward. I'd like to add to that. You know, the Aethon agreement and the assets that they have under their umbrella with us are indeed a big deal to us, and I think it's a pretty big deal to them. We have contractual relations with those guys that are pretty constructed to address a long-term development program, not just a given six or nine or 12 or 24 month cycle, because this is a 20-year development program out there. Our royalty rates vary with gas prices, and we also stay in touch with those folks. Never say never on people changing their direction, but we don't have any indication of that with Aethon at this point in time. We think they're great operators and great long-term partners, and we will be responsive to them, and I think they to us, in developing that program for the long haul. Okay. I appreciate the comments. Thank you all. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one on your touchtone phone. You may remove yourself from the queue by pressing star and two. We'll pause a moment to allow further questions to queue. We'll take a question from Monroe Helm with Clemensen Capital. Your line is open. Thanks a lot, and thanks for the information so far. I'm kinda new to the story, and I appreciate some of the color on the agreements. Just on the Aethon agreement, since you just mentioned it's kind of a 20-year development plan, is there a certain number of wells we're committed to drill in 2020 by year over the next two or three years? Not just 2023, but 2024, 2025. Yeah, this is Evan. I'll start with that. You know, at the end of this year, where they start ramping up to 27 wells per year, that's the current terminal rates that it goes to going forward. That program originally started with, you know, Angelina County at four wells per year, ramped up to 10 and then 15, and then also including the development agreement in Saint Augustine, they went from five to 10 to 12 going forward. That's where we get to the, you know, growing into that 27 well pace at the end of this year that's going to continue into future development years. Okay. The quick- There's a lot of subtleties and things in those agreements that they can use to control their own destiny. In fact, if they go above 27 wells a year, they actually get even a lower royalty from us, which is a win-win for them and for us. Who knows, that may be happening also. It's a complicated agreement. Keeps our land administration team on its toes and it's a great partnership so far. Okay. Can you tell me a little bit about how you entice some of these producers to drill on your acreage? I think I noted in the press release that there are some completion techniques that have enhanced the rate of returns over in the Austin Chalk. Could you maybe talk about that and whether or not there's some opportunities there to get more activity on your acreage? Well, I would say this is an area where we have a lot of acreage. Some of it is very old production. It's been out there since the late 1990s, 20-plus-year-old wells. We're taking steps with the operators of those older properties to encourage them to redevelop the property, and that's hopefully gonna pay some dividends. In addition to that, we have acreage that is in the play that wasn't tied up, where we have made trades with folks to come in and drill wells on that property, not charging them large upfront fees and working with them on royalty to stimulate activity. Because as the critical mass of the whole area, which is several hundred thousand acres, increases, the likelihood of more rapid development increases. The wells that have been drilled to date in the core of the play have been very good wells, and there's a lot more of them to look at, like the ones I mentioned earlier. One other thing. When you were setting your most recent distribution increase, how seriously did you consider an environment where we might have $2-$2.50 gas for some extended period of time? I think we believe and took into account that 2023 and 2024 and maybe some into 2025 are gonna be challenging for natural gas markets. I mean, as we've all looked out over the last five years, I think it's a general consensus in the industry that until some of these newer LNG export facilities come online, there's gonna be a lull in growth of natural gas because there's production has gone up and the prices that were in existence last year really saw some increases in activity. We think it's gonna be a period of time where we don't see that much growth, but we're well hedged, and we have agreements that we don't think our operators are gonna be highly volatile in their well count. Okay. Well, I appreciate your answers. You're welcome. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one on your touch-tone phone. It appears we have no further questions. I'll turn the program back to the speakers. Well, thank you all for joining us today, and we look forward to, talking with you in a couple of months. This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.