Good morning. My name is Becky, and I will be the conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Bowman Consulting Group Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2025 conference call. All lines will be placed on mute for the presentation portion of the call, with the opportunity for questions and answers at the end. Please note that many of the comments made today are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. As described in the company's filings with the SEC, these statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ from those expressed, and the company is not obligated to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements. In addition, on today's call, the company will discuss certain non-GAAP financial information such as Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, and net service billing. You can find this information together with the reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP information in the company's earning press release filed with the SEC and on the company's investor relations website at investors.bowman.com. Management will deliver prepared remarks, after which they will take questions from research analysts. A replay of this call will be available on the company's investor relations website. Mr. Bowman, you may now begin your prepared remarks. Okay, thanks, Becky. Good morning, everyone, thanks for joining our year-end earnings call. Bruce Labovitz, our CFO, is with me this morning, along with Dan Swayze, our Chief Operating Officer. First, I'd like to welcome all new Bowman employees who joined us this quarter, including those from RPT Alliance who joined in December. After my introductory remarks, I'll turn the call over to Bruce, who will cover our financial performance and technology initiatives. Dan will discuss operational successes, including where we're winning and why. I'll end the call with some closing statements before opening it to Q&A. Going forward, we plan to periodically introduce members of our leadership team to provide deeper insight into specific aspects of our business. Let's start with fourth quarter and full-year results. You know, it's hard to believe that 2025 was our fourth full year as a public company and the final year of our emerging growth company status. I'm pleased to report that we delivered another record year as we advanced our efforts to become an ENR Top 50 firm. We achieved our goals of generating double-digit growth in gross revenue, organic net revenue, and Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, we increased our capture rate for public contracts with growth of approximately 28%. We entered 2026 with a record backlog of over $479 million, of which 20% improvement over the prior year. We strengthened our position in our existing markets through acquisitions, acqui-hires, and organic workforce expansion. Our increasing breadth of services, growing scale, and redoubled commitment to relationship building produced new order growth for the year that was particularly strong in power utilities, transportation, and natural resources. All of which are markets where we are seeing increased durable long-term demand. Our book-to-burn ratio continues to be over 1x, a level which I am proud to say we have achieved consistently since our public debut in 2021. The first quarter of 2026 is so far no exception, with sales this quarter outpacing the fourth quarter. With the successful acquisition and integration of several consequential acquisitions during the year and these results as a springboard, I'm confident we're positioned for another breakout year in 2026. With that, I'll turn the call over to Bruce to review our financial performance in greater detail. Bruce? Great. Thanks, Gary. I'm going to start with a little off-script nod to Gary in light of his recent announcement. When I came to Bowman in 2013, we were a $50 million company with around 450 employees. Gary's vision of achievement at the time was a diversified $100 million revenue company where people could thrive and grow. For the past 13 years, he's been deliberate in his leadership with a conviction about growth and a steadfast commitment to our culture. With $490 million in revenue to end the company's 30th anniversary year and 2,500 committed professionals living our values every day, I think it's fair to say Gary's qualified for membership in the Overachievers Club. On behalf of everyone at Bowman, I want to publicly thank you for all you've done. That's nice, Bruce. Thank you. Okay, turning to the fourth quarter and full year 2025. I'm pleased to be here today discussing another breakout year for Bowman. With quarterly gross revenue of $129 million, we've now had two consecutive quarters at a revenue run rate of greater than $500 million. Net service billing, which we use interchangeably with net revenue, was under $14.6 million in the quarter, up 16.2% compared to last year. At an 89% net-to-gross ratio, up 200 basis points over last year, growth was disproportionately achieved through net revenue. For the full year, gross and net revenue were up 14.9% and 14.5% to $490 million and $434.8 million, while maintaining a net-to-gross ratio of 89%. We again generated double-digit growth of organic net revenue at 12.4%. Gross margin for the quarter was 55%, up 190 basis points from last year, and 53.4% for the full year, up 120 basis points over last year. SG&A for the full year was down 250 basis points compared to the prior year. Combined overhead for the year, in other words, the combination of all labor, both direct and indirect, with SG&A, was down 400 basis points compared to the prior year. We believe this reflects an evolving mix of business and the scaling strategy we've been working towards for several years. Pre-tax net income for the year was $11.2 million, as compared to a loss of $8.9 million in the prior year. Net income was $12.8 million for the full year, as compared to $3 million for the prior year. With issues related to research and experimentation capitalization resolved, tax benefits had a lesser impact on our fourth quarter on the full year results. Moving forward, tax is projected to have a more normalized impact on our statements, including simplifying the calculation of changes in working capital on our operating cash flows, no longer splitting the effect above and within the working capital. With Section 174 capitalization no longer an issue, it's key to note that we do still benefit from other permanent research and development credits that reduce our effective tax rate and never expire. We believe the turnaround in pre-tax GAAP profitability this year is a result of the improved labor utilization, scale, and full integration strategy we've been executing to achieve efficiency in operations. We're pleased to see meaningful increase in EPS, both GAAP-based and adjusted. On a GAAP basis, our basic and diluted EPS of $0.74 and $0.73 were up 300% year-over-year. On an adjusted basis, our basic and diluted EPS of $1.72 and $1.68 were up nearly 40% for the prior year. Holding our share count through buybacks also helped. With absolute growth in all market verticals this year, we continued to advance our objective of increased revenue diversification. Revenue distribution continued to shift positively in 2025, with transportation at 21.2%, power and utility at a 22.4%, natural resources 11.5%, and building infrastructure down to 44.9%. We expect this trend and trajectory to continue in 2026. Our geospatial operations continued to be increasingly consequential and represented approximately 26% of 2025's gross revenue as a service that was spread across all markets. In the aggregate, around 30% of total gross revenue was derived from government or public-funded work assignments, an area where we expect to continue to grow over the short and long term. Organic net revenue growth was 11% in the fourth quarter and 12.4% for the full year, excluding UPE, III, SOA, LAS, and an RPT. Broken down by vertical for the quarter and for the full year, natural resources led the way with 29% and 27% growth. Power and utilities delivered 11% and 13% growth. Transportation grew 6% and 22%, and building infrastructure was up 9% and 6%. The organic growth rate in transportation in the fourth quarter was a function of delayed contracting and notices to proceed in Q3 of 2024. While we caught up in Q4 of 2024, the delay created a skewed growth curve for the year. All was well within our transportation business, and we continued to win consequential new awards. I think it's also worth pointing out the steady increase in organic net revenue growth in building infrastructure throughout the year. We're optimistic that this represents a developing trend for that market. Backlog increased 20% to $479 million on December 31st, 2025, up from $399 million at the end of 2024. While every vertical was up, the biggest gainer was power and utilities, where we were particularly active with business development and acquisitions. Excluding purchased backlog in place at year-end, the increase was 18.5% at $473 million. Sales of new work after closing an acquisition would not be considered acquired backlog. In the case of RPT, while we have very strong visibility into projects and schedules, work is released in more frequent phases that keep their forecasts high but their backlog low relative to the overall companies. Cash from operating activities for the full year increased by nearly 50% to $35.8 million from $24.3 million in the prior year. Net working capital increases adjusted for the UTP changes represented the equivalent of a roughly four-month investment in growth revenue. Reducing that investment by 25% through process automation and operational efficiencies could add 7 to 8 percentage points to cash flow conversion. This is high on our to-do list in 2026. Net debt at the end of the year was $179 million, including the all-cash acquisition of RPT on December 5th. Leverage was 2.45x trailing 12 months and 2.06x the midpoint of our 2026 guidance. We expect to increase cash flow from operations during the year to continue to reduce this debt throughout 2026. On March 3rd, we executed a third amendment to our credit facility with BofA, TD Bank, and PNC to increase the maximum borrowing to $250 million. We increased the facility to ensure we have sufficient access to affordable capital to continue funding investments in organic growth, innovation and efficiency, accretive acquisitions, and stock repurchases. As of today, we have available liquidity of approximately $150 million. During 2025, we periodically repurchased $18.8 million worth of our common stock at an average price of $27.51 per share. We continue to view stock repurchases as a means of addressing liquidity and valuation dislocations as opposed to a commitment to the return of capital. Assuming market stability and a rational valuation of our equity, our top priorities remain investment in organic and inorganic growth. We remain steadfast in our commitment to investment and innovation. The BIG Fund, our internal technology incubator, is funding ideas presented by our employees to make impactful investments that advance our capabilities, improve the efficiency of our workforce, and decouple revenue growth from headcount growth, increase the value of our services, and extend customer engagement. It's admittedly a tricky time in our industry with respect to innovation and AI. We need to be sure we're prioritizing investment in processes and services relating to deliverables sold at stable values as opposed to efficiencies that merely cannibalize the work of work sold by the unit. We're making significant investments this year in our fleet of geospatial imaging assets, including high-resolution, high-altitude scanners, along with improved capture vehicles, including planes, UAVs, drones, and boats, all of which increase collection rates and data processing efficiencies by as much as 30%-40%. We continue to integrate the technologies we've developed in-house with tools we purchased in the recent ORCaS acquisition. We are launching PACK, our Port Asset Conditions Kit, which provides GIS-enabled digital twin-based lifecycle asset management to port and marine operators. As opposed to the traditional software-as-a-service subscription model, we've put forward a services-powered-by-software model that engages our integrated digital platforms with customers through a professional services arrangement that combines process automation and professional intervention. As we develop our suite of AI and GIS-enabled tool sets, we believe we're well-positioned to monetize the library of assets in our growing digital services and advisory practice into a unique value proposition for our customers and shareholders. In connection with yesterday's release, we increased our full-year 2026 guidance to a range of $495 million-$510 million and an Adjusted EBITDA margin of 17%-17.5%. At an 88% net-to-gross ratio, this would represent $563 million-$580 million of gross revenue. This increased net revenue guide includes the recent RPT acquisition without contemplating any future acquisitions. At the midpoint of our net revenue guidance, this represents approximately 16% absolute growth over last year. Pro forma to exclude RPT's 2025 revenue from the basis and from next year, from this year, we're projecting just over 12% organic net revenue growth. We expect revenue during the year to again be nonlinear, with the first and fourth quarters representing around 47% of net revenue and the second and third to be around 53% of net revenue. This should not be construed as quarterly revenue guidance, but rather as a guideline for relative weighting of the quarters throughout the year. I'm now going to turn the call over to Dan Swayze, our Chief Operating Officer, who's joining us today to provide insight into the question of where we're winning and why. Dan has been with Bowman for over three and a half years and has spent two decades in senior leadership roles in civil and energy-related engineering. At Bowman, Dan's focus as the Chief Operating Officer is on the management and execution of our portfolio of services across markets. Dan, welcome. Thank you, Bruce. Good morning, everyone. I know a lot of our team is listening to the call today, and I sincerely thank them for all they do and their commitment to Bowman. I'm very proud of our team. Today, I'm going to focus on where we are winning in the market and why those wins are becoming increasingly repeatable, in other words, our right to win. Over the past several years, we have been deliberate about building differentiated capabilities in markets where technical depth, geographical reach, capacity, execution consistency, and integrated end-to-end ability creates a competitive advantage. Our acquisition strategy across the country created integrated service delivery teams in our various markets. In our data center and mission-critical practice, we are increasing our win rate by meeting our clients where they are. Data center programs are rarely single-service projects. They are multi-phase, multi-service opportunities. For example, combining the electrical and mechanical engineering forces from our e3i acquisition, the fire and life safety design services from our Fisher acquisition with our established capabilities in civil planning and engineering, we have a strong service offering our clients can rely on. Our ability to deliver consistent technical standards across jurisdictions while maintaining strong relationships positions us as a long-term partner rather than a one-time design provider. Major operators continue to deploy capacity into new regions, we are following them into those markets, pairing local engineering knowledge with the strength of our national platform. We are expanding wallet share and deepening our engagements in a durable growth market. This approach increases client stickiness. The power utility sector remains a robust market for our organization, spanning electric, oil and gas, as well as renewables. Bowman is actively involved in supporting the development and expansion of new power supplies for utilities, addressing the evolving and urgent need for bridging power for data centers, and the rapid deployment of compressor stations for the midstream movement of natural gas. The services we provide for our natural gas clients are provided through a combination of several of our acquisitions, including MTX Surveying, RPT Alliance, Exelis Engineering, Burke Engineering. Our approach leverages a comprehensive suite of services, seamlessly integrating a unique collection of geospatial expertise and equipment with proven engineering solutions to address the evolving needs of our clients. This multi-service, end-to-end strategy ensures we can consistently deliver innovative, reliable, one-stop-shop outcomes across the diverse landscape of our clients' needs. Being in early establishes incumbency, and incumbency is an important element to our right to win. Our geospatial engagements often create pull-through opportunities for related engineering and advisory services. Our recent investment to new aircraft and advanced lidar sensors directly strengthens our competitive position. These advanced capabilities allow us to support complex infrastructure initiatives, including utility extension expansion both in electricity and natural gas, damage assessments, land acquisition, land development, and other large-scale public works projects. As an example, we were recently renewed for a five-year agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide photogrammetric mapping and related survey services. Being awarded this renewal with this renewed agreement reflects both past performance and technical differentiation. We're also continuing to build strength in transportation across the U.S., where our extensive history of timely delivery and our expansive portfolio of creative bridge and highway design create a meaningful competitive opportunity. Our comprehensive transportation services offerings are an amalgamation of our acquisitions of McMahon, Spees Lewis, and Exeltech, and our legacy teams in Chicago area providing end-to-end solutions. Transportation agencies prioritize demonstrated experience and capacity to deliver on comparable assets. The depth of our expertise and project experience in these regions drives repeated wins. Across these markets and others we participate in, the pattern is consistent. We win where specialized technical expertise matters. Past performance and incumbency create barriers to entries to our competitors. Our national presence enhances client value, where our integrated geospatial and engineering delivery improve client outcomes. Our operational investments, including workflow modernization, data integration, and selective automation using AI and machine learning, support these markets by improving throughput and timely delivery of superior outcomes. These investments are in service of a larger objective to strengthen our competitive standing in the market, where we see durable demand and long-term growth potential. We are not pursuing growth indiscriminately. We are concentrating on efficient use of capital, leveraging our talent, and embracing technology in markets where we have established credibility and where our integrated platform creates measurable differentiation and competitive advantage. The result, we continue to successfully deepen client relationships, enhance our right to win multi-service assignments, and strengthen our foundation for sustained revenue growth. Our competitive position in the industry has never been stronger. Our right to win continues to broaden throughout our markets. With that, I'll turn it over to Gary. Great. Thanks, Dan. As Bruce mentioned, our focus on execution, organic growth, and strategic acquisition was evident in our results. We exited 2025 with strong momentum, some of the best margins in the E&C group, and a backlog that foreshadows another year of double-digit revenue growth. We enter 2026 with a renewed focus on disciplined growth and continued operational improvement along our service platform. While change in the occupant of the CEO chair is ahead of us, the core of this company, its senior leadership and professional workforce, is as intact, cohesive, and aligned in its mission. With the exceptional talent we have at every level of this organization, I'm really excited for the future of the company I founded some 30 years ago. I'll now turn the call back to Becky for questions. Thank you. If you did wish to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad now. If you feel your question has been answered or for any reason you would like to remove yourself from the queue, please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your device is unmuted locally. Our first question comes from Aaron Spychalla from Craig-Hallum. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Yeah, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Morning, Aaron. Morning. First, maybe on the RPT acquisition. Good morning. Thanks. On RPT, you know, can you just maybe talk a little bit about, you know, what that brings to your offering, you know, an early read on just how integration is going there and kind of potential synergies within the platform? Yeah. I'll start off with the second part of the question. Actually, integration there is well ahead of any other, you know, acquisition that we've done. It's pretty much, you know, integrated from an operating and financial perspective. It's on its way from a platform perspective. We jumped right on that one 'cause the, you know, the opportunity is right ahead of us to grow that business in connection with the rest of the components of Bowman. It's integrated. It really extends our product offering in LNG. I'll let Dan talk for a second about the extension of the LNG and data center product offering. Yeah. If you go back to what we talked about a minute ago, and you think about our right to win, RPT's skill set and client reach puts us right into the whole midstream movement of natural gas, feeding liquefied natural gas centers and also gives us that opportunity to provide more consulting and engineering services for those building pipelines. I'll also say we've already been successful in several cross-selling efforts where, you know, the combination of services has gotten us into projects that we otherwise you know, probably wouldn't have been necessarily a lead contender for. All right. Thanks for the color there. Then maybe second on EBITDA margins, you know, good performance in the quarter, 17.3. You know, just thinking about the guidance for 2026, you know, were there anything, you know, noteworthy from a driver perspective in the fourth quarter, and what are some of the factors you're incorporating for 2026, and how are you thinking about potential for upside there? Yes. Again, I think, Aaron, we've demonstrated that, you know, that margin is not necessarily always consistent, you know, throughout the quarters, but that we look at the year as As being able to deliver from what was a 16%, you know, high 16s% this year to what we think will be a mid-17s%, you know, next year. It's continuous improvement in margin. It always has to do with the timing of the acquisition of labor relative to the starts of projects. That's our biggest driver of margin in any particular period is the, you know, how well we time the collection of labor and with the realization of revenue. We would think that we continue to as we scale, grow margin over overhead and as we implement, you know, better and better workflow processes, automated processes, we optimize labor. I think we can increase by another, you know, we're projecting another, you know, 50 to 50+ basis points of margin expansion this year. 50%-80%, you know, 80 points, and I think those are the key drivers. All right. Thanks for taking the questions, Gary. You know, congrats on the retirement and best of luck to everyone moving forward. Thank you, Aaron. Thanks, Aaron. Thank you. Our next question comes from Min Cho from Texas Capital Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, Min. Great. Thank you very much. Congrats on a really strong year. Good morning. You know, you mentioned that the building segment saw some organic growth this quarter and that there were some developing trends. Can you talk a little bit about just the opportunities that you're seeing there? As I put it, we're optimistic that this is a developing trend. I'm not sure we're ready to call it yet. I think one thing that we are expecting to see at some point is a focus on affordability of housing. We're already seeing it at the state level. You're seeing the requirements for permitting being loosened, and stimulus for more affordable housing. That's where we really thrive, is in creating supply for builders and for the home building, and multifamily markets. We saw some good positive movement there. It is geographical in nature, and some pockets of the country, you know, are better at times than others. We're optimistic that that's an early indicator of, you know, some opportunity for bigger growth in that market again. Excellent. Got it. Also, on slide eight, you provided some gross margin by verticals, and I'm just wondering if you can talk about how that has kind of trended over the last few years. I'm assuming that it's kind of expanded just with the scale that you have. Can you talk a little bit about expectations for 2026, just directionally across the. Yeah. Min, you broke up a little bit there. I think the question was about the gross margins by vertical and expectations on those for the year. I'm gonna assume that was the question. Yes. Ah, and, and so- Yes It's consistent with where we were in the third quarter when we started reporting on gross margin by vertical. With transportation being more of a cost-plus kind of market, but with longer-term commitments and longer engagements that reduce turnover costs there and create stability in workforce. We think that the other three markets continue to have favorable gross margins, and I don't see anything that's gonna erode those throughout the course of this year. If anything, processes, process automations can help to improve those slightly. Great. Thank you. Just finally, your natural resources segment obviously had strong organic growth this quarter, and just in the year. I don't think Dan spoke too much about that segment, but can you just provide a little more detail about where that demand is coming from? Seeing any green shoots there? Yeah. In some respect, that's a little bit of the catch-all for what doesn't fit into other categories, but it includes environmental, it includes mining, it includes water resources, it includes agricultural imaging and ortho imaging, and it includes land services associated with assisting landowners in acquisition of easements and other rights of way when it's not land acquisition for a power utility or for a road bridge or highway. It's a large category for us in terms of the number of things that fit in there. A lot of exciting projects that, you know, are developing in that area, particularly with water resources, particularly with high-altitude aerial imaging, and in the land services business. Great. Thank you very much. Thank you, Min. Thanks, Min. Thank you. Our next question comes from Andy Wittmann from Baird. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Yeah, great. Good morning. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I have a few here. Good morning. Where do I wanna start? I guess, I don't know, maybe I'm reading into it too closely, but in your press release kinda talked about 2026 being, I forgot the exact terminology, more of an organic year. Am I reading? That sounds like a little bit of change. You said in your script here that your priorities are still in organic growth and inorganic growth, so it just feels like maybe there's a change there. Is there more kind of organic focus in 2026 than in the past? If that is correct, why the change? It's not. I don't have a value judgment here. I don't. This is not to say you should be doing more M&A or not. I'm just kind of curious if there is a change there, why there's a change there? Andy, this is Gary. There is really, there's not a fundamental change. We're still committed to inorganic growth. We're a little narrower in our focus with strategic opportunities and moving toward bigger opportunities. You're seeing maybe a less frequent, certainly less frequent announcements. We are just as committed to ever to a strong growth of a strong combination of inorganic and organic growth. I think there is an evolving nature of the market, that there's opportunity to invest in the expansion of our services, right? Through investment in technologies and innovation, and that's all organic. You know, we continue to be investing in expansion of our capabilities and expansion of the capability of our workforce to generate revenue. As Gary said, I think we'll do less frequent small-. Yeah But still be focused on acquisition, and in the meantime, be focused on internal investment in organic growth. Thanks for, you know, for bringing it up, because I think it's an important- Yes. Absolutely It's an important point of distinction there. We want to clarify that. Yeah. Okay, great. Bruce, in your comments, you talked about some things that are gonna be a kind of a priority on collecting working capital this year. Could you just elaborate on that a little bit more? It does feel like there is some working capital opportunity maybe at lots of different places, including your receivables. I just thought it'd be worth checking in here again. With those a little bit higher, than you've been for a while, what is a realistic goal here for DSOs maybe, as we progress here through 2026? Yeah. One thing I will point out that, you know, we're already so far past the end of the year, it's hard to remember that at the end of the year, there was a government shutdown. That did slow collection on a portion of our receivables, not because they weren't collectible, but just because, you know, getting them processed was slower in a, you know, in a portion of our business. I think there's a little bit of extension of receivables from that artificial impact. Getting work through working capital is an important focus for us, certainly. Getting work to be billable, not necessarily that we aren't earning it, but getting it to the point of billing and collecting it, you know, is something that, you know, we're working towards, you know, narrowing down. I think reducing, let's say, work in process, which is a component of working capital, will be, you know, a focus this year. You know, we're always working on collections, Andy. It's a, you know, it's one of the great challenges that, you know, never seems to completely get solved. Between that, between, you know, we upgraded our ERP system throughout in 2025, and we think that'll help facilitate the process of processing work. To follow on Bruce's point, always working on collections for 31 some years. It's in our DNA. We have to keep the cash flowing. Yep. Okay. My next few here are maybe just kinda more kinda model-focused or whatever. Some of these are kind of important. Bruce, you talked about a more normalized tax rate. What is the effective tax rate that you think is applicable here in 2026? Yeah. I would say that it is, you know, based on our statutory less our R&D credits, it's somewhere in that high teen, 20% kinda range. Okay. Great. Then just This is really myopic, but I think notable. As I look at 2025 and That's the total. That's the number that we should use basically, on the company's income statement. It's high teens, low twenties. Yeah. Yep. Is that correct? Yeah. Yeah. I was looking back at 2025 and the margin progression for 2020. I'm sorry, you were trying to say something. Go ahead. No, I wasn't. Go ahead. Sorry, I thought I heard you chime in. Okay. The second quarter net Adjusted EBITDA margin was higher than the third quarter Adjusted EBITDA margin in 2025. That's usually for companies like yours, the third quarter margin is higher than the second quarter. I guess my question is, as we mar. You talked about revenue center seasonality in your prepared remarks, but just on this one specifically, it feels like I wanna put the higher margin in the third quarter than in the second quarter. Am I thinking about that correctly, or is there a reason that that pattern from last year would repeat again here in 2026? No, I don't think it's necessarily a repeatable pattern from last year. I think we had some. We talked about it in the second quarter of last year. There were a few exceptional items that, you know, sort of hit on all cylinders. I think that, you know. Yeah I wouldn't necessarily say that that is indicative of our, of a pattern, you know, permanently. Yeah. Okay. Just wanted to make sure. I'm trying to think if there's anything else here. Yeah. Okay. I think I'm good there. Thank you very much. We'll be around if you have more. Thanks, Andy. Sounds great. Thanks, Andy. Thank you. Our next question comes from Tomo Sano from JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Welcome, Tomo. Hello, everyone. Morning. Thank you. Gary, although we have only recently met, I would like to express our respect and appreciation for your leadership and culture as you prepare for your retirement. Thank you, Tomo. That's very kind. Thank you. I would like to kick off. You raised your 2026 net revenue guidance to $495 million-$510 million. In which segments or projects are driving this upward revisions? Are you currently $479 million backlog? What proportion do you expect to convert to revenue in 2026, please? Generally speaking, Tomo, we turn somewhere between 70% and 80% of backlog in a year, in a 12-month period. Sometimes it gets a little longer, sometimes it gets a little shorter, but generally speaking, we think of 70%-80% of backlog at any moment has a 12-month tail to it. In terms of where we think we're going to continue to see growth, obviously, power is an area that we expect to, you know, to contribute to the growth year-over-year. A big chunk of that guidance increase was from the acquisition of RPT that happened after last, after third quarter's conference call. That's all power related in that bit of the increase. The rest of it is between natural resources and. Transportation Transportation. Yeah. Thank you, Bruce. A follow-up on up-upcoming CEO transitions. Could you talk about how you're ensuring management stability and continuities? Are there any qualitative KPIs or targets related to successions and strategic continuity, please? Effective communication, we are doing economic retention packages for some key people. Really, the communication of the continuation of our culture. You know, a qualitative view of success in the succession is certainly retention of our key staff, retention of our leadership, continued forward execution of our strategic plan. We've got 2,500 people who depend on the continued success of this company every day, and, you know, we take that responsibility very seriously. You know, the board takes that responsibility very seriously. We are all wholly committed to the long-term success of this. We're all invested in the long-term success of this company and seeing this through without any disruption in- Right Service to our customers, in service to our employees, and, you know, in value generation to our shareholders. You know, I'll also follow up there, Tomo. As a member of the board, I'm not on the search and selection committee, but certainly I have input. I would not have made this move if I didn't have great confidence in the board getting this right, both for the legacy, my legacy, candidly, personal legacy, and my personal economics. I'm still the largest shareholder, single shareholder in the company, and I tend to continue to own a tremendous amount of the stock in the long run. I have a real vested interest in the success. Thank you very much. That's all for me. Thanks, Tomo. Thanks, Tomo. Thank you. Our next question comes from Liam Burke from B. Riley Securities. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Morning, Liam. Thank you. Good morning. Morning, Gary, Bruce, Dan. Morning. Morning. Gary, congratulations on your retirement. Thank you, Liam. When you reach critical mass here on the front end of the infrastructure projects, has there been any competitive pushback from some of the larger specialty contractors that are looking to move into your space since it is probably the most profitable piece of the project? Are you talking about in the, in the, power space or just? Sorry. Yeah Writ large, Liam? Power space? Let's go on the infrastructure at large scale. Yeah. There's a real line of distinction in the industry between, I'd say, the construction companies, I think that's what you're asking about, and the engineering firms, and there's a, you know, collegial relationship between... We've not felt threatened. Dan, you can tell if you've, you know, felt it from the ground up from, let's say, specialty construction contractors trying to make their way into the engineering world. No. In some cases, we're working for those contractors, so, it's not really a threat that we see. Yeah. If anything, I'd say it's drawn the other way, is that there's such a resource constraint in this space that, you know, it's an all hands on deck kind of mindset. Mm-hmm. There are functions of the construction process that the specialty contractors need help with. Mm-hmm. Right? the equipment providers, the GCs, you know, need help. there's no, you know, no effort to share risk on that part of the process, but there is an effort to bring in help. Mm-hmm. Okay, fair enough. Across the board, you had good growth across all your business segments, do you see any pockets of weakness or is it just your diversification to be able to move right past it? You know, right now I would say that there are no pockets of weakness. There's no negative, you know, connotation in any of the markets or segments. Obviously, we're keeping an eye on the growth rate of the building infrastructure space. It's, it's still our biggest and still continuing to grow, and we have hopes for it to accelerate. I wouldn't characterize it as weakness. It's getting attention from us to make sure that, you know, we keep our staffing right and our, you know, and all of our overhead right for that, for that group. On the others, it's, as I use the same phrase, it's all hands on deck effort to try to keep up with power and transportation and other resources. Great. Thank you. The good news, Liam, as we've talked about, is that in our workforce, it's very fungible across the four markets. We don't have silos of workforce that are only able to do one thing. You know, the base of our labor pyramid, you know, really is very cross-disciplined and cross-market capable. You know, we focus on that kind of business model deliberately. Great. Thanks again. Thank you. Thank you, Liam. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeff Martin from Roth Capital Partners. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, Jeff. Thank you. Good morning, Gary, Bruce, and Dan. Good morning. Bruce and Gary, I wonder if you could touch on RPT. I know that, you know, they were constrained for growth, and you've owned it roughly three months now. Just curious how much you've been able to staff up for RPT during the initial three months, and maybe give us a glimpse at what's your hiring plans for that business in particular, as well as touch on just general, you know, availability of labor and ability to staff up in front of larger contracts in general. Yeah. As Gary, I'll jump in. As we were doing our due diligence on RPT and certainly part of the attraction is all the opportunities in the space that they are in. They're being down as a single office operation in Houston, but being in Houston, there are pockets of the oil and gas industry that are or especially the oil industry, maybe up until this past week, that have been soft and it's been a good availability of labor down there. We've found the ability for the RPT group to staff up as flexible as any of our pieces of business. I think it's been also, you know, them becoming part of a much larger organization has given them access to staffing that has availability of utilization as well. We've camped down the shortage by adding capacity from our system. The other thing that we've been doing a lot of now is insourcing things that they used to outsource. Yeah. We're finding, you know, they're using survey, they're using our fire protection, they're using our mechanical, and we're grabbing, essentially, we're grabbing more work from their clients, which is again, putting a little more stress on the need for people. It's what we do for a living is making sure that we can meet the needs, meet demand with supply. Great. wanted to touch on geospatial. you mentioned roughly 20, I think 26%, 24% of your net net revenue. Sounds like you're making investments, further investments in geospatial. Maybe you could elaborate, you know, kind of some of the general demand trends you're seeing there. If you could also touch on the competitive dynamic for geospatial, that'd be helpful. You know, Jeff, geospatial is pretty much at the core of everything that we do. A lot of the work we do originates with imaging. It processes through imaging, and utilizes survey and scanning and three-dimensional iteration throughout the lifecycle of the asset. We don't think of it as a vertical because it's a service that really supports every bit of business that we do. It's kind of at the epicenter of our services portfolio. You know, we are making investments in that space because it's evolving so quickly. Those that are ahead have distinct advantages. Geospatial is one of those service lines that creates, as Dan mentioned, incumbency. Incumbency is such a valuable asset in the lifecycle of asset work. We're buying high resolution scanners. We're buying imaging technology that does underwater lidar. You know, we're buying vehicles that collect data, whether that's from the air, from the water. You know, we're improving the operational efficiency of our high altitude fleet, which spends a lot of time, let's say, chasing weather. If we can shorten the chase, we get more productivity out of it. There's plenty of work to be done there. Geospatial is we think, you know, it is really a critical part of the overall product we deliver, we wanna be a leader in our fleet. Great. Could you tie that into your CapEx and, you know, property and equipment acquired and capital lease projections or-? Yeah. or estimates for this year? It's generally included. I mean, it's included in that bucket. We may. Again, we sort of talk about an average of 3%, 4% spending on CapEx. Episodically, it may be, you know, a little bit higher and a little bit lower in years. This may be one of the little bit higher years as we continue to improve that, the fleet. As revenue's growing, you know, you absorb that CapEx from a percentage perspective as well. I don't think it's gonna, you know, in any way put it off the charts, but it, you know, it could pop at a point or so this year. These are long-lived assets. You know, you buy 'em in one year, they last for several years. Thank you. Gary, congratulations on your retirement. Thank you, Jeff. Jeff, look forward to seeing you guys in a couple of weeks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Sherif El-Sabbahy from Bank of America. The line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, Sherif. Morning. Hey, everyone. This is Nandita. Nandita, Sherif, how are you? Hey, everyone. This is Nandita Nayar for Sherif. Morning. Hey. I'm good, Gary. How are you? Good. Thanks. Awesome. Just quickly on the full-year guide, guys. You know, you've raised the net revenues for the full year, the EBITDA guide was maintained. Could you just talk about, you know, the margin profile or maybe of, like, recent acquisitions like RPT? Does it, you know, come at, like, lower margins with, you know, other cost optimization measures in the business, holding margins steady at, like, 17.5%? On the flip side, you know, is it slightly accretive, and are there other temporary investments in the business that we should be aware of that's, you know, holding margins back a little bit? I'm not sure I'd characterize it as holding margins back in the sense that, you know, look, we continue to grow margin. We're growing it. You know, we're committing to grow it, you know, another half to 50 to 50-plus basis points during the year. We're very much focused on expanding margin over time. RPT is a high-margin business, but again, as a percentage of our overall business, you know, even being a significantly higher margin business doesn't necessarily drag the whole business along from a margin perspective. We think that, you know, being able to get 17.5% margin's a pretty high bar for the industry. I think that, you know, as you asked about, you know, contributors to that, certainly, sort of this concept that we introduced about, decoupling revenue growth from headcount growth doesn't mean shrinking your workforce, but it means growing revenue faster than you grow workforce, and that increases margin. That's from the tools that we're employing, and investing in. As sort of as one of the earlier questions about organic investment and investing in these, in these processes and service line expansions, we think will add margin over time. We've talked about that, you know, we believe that this is a high teens margin business without innovation and an even higher one with. You know, it's a journey that we continue to be on. That's helpful. Also, guys, you know, net leverage is, I think, around, you mentioned, 1.9x, just, you know, higher than historical levels. Just could you remind us of your target range again? You know, I believe, like, historically it's been around, I think, 0.8x on average. Could we, you know, see leverage structurally closure and maybe, like, to the high end of your range for, like, a certain period of time as Bowman kind of gets more acquisitive, or is there a plan to de-lever to historical levels over the near to medium term? Yeah. We've typically been in the, in the 1.5 kind of range, one of, you know, the mid ones. We made this acquisition of RPT on December 5th, didn't get any of the benefit at year-end for any of the, you know, the EBITDA from that, from that acquisition, but had all the leverage on our balance sheet. When we look ahead, it's about on a pro forma basis, about two. That's before we start paying that down with cash flow, you know, that we'll generate from this year. We hit 50% cash flow generation this year. We think that's going to continue to improve. You know, at an EBITDA of, you know, in the 17s margin on, you know, $500 million of revenue, there's gonna be a good deal of cash flow to be used to pay that down. We know we'll continue to be growth oriented and to the extent that we identify another acquisition, you know, we would certainly. You know, there could be additional leverage from it, but there'd also be significant amount of EBITDA from it. I think that you'll see us structurally, you know, try to achieve a below two, keep it in that, you know, 1.5-2 range, which has been our sort of our target. I think we've been consistent that episodically we will be higher, as we invest, you know, in growth. Got it. Just lastly, you know, on the $25 million BIG Fund, could you just give us a sense of how much has been committed versus funded? Just kinda like the runway there. Thanks. I'll turn it over. I would say that we're roughly about halfway into it in terms of committed. It doesn't mean it's all been expended. There's a lot of proof of concept, a lot of proof of returns of, you know, and a lot of other factors to, you know, that over the next 12 to 18 months we would, you know, fund the projects that have come forward. Some of it is the investment in assets in geospatial that will facilitate some of these additional services. I'd say we're about halfway into ideas that have, that would be funded. Okay. Perfect. That's great color. I'll turn it over. Gary, congrats. Thanks so much. Thanks, Nandita. Thank you. As we have no further questions on the line, I will now hand back to Gary Bowman for final comments. Thanks again, Becky. Well, thanks for everybody for joining us on the call today. We're very pleased with where we're at, pleased with the prospects for the year. Thanks to certainly to all the employees and to our investors for all the faith that you put into us. Have a great day, everyone. Thank you. This concludes today's call. You may now disconnect your lines.