Good day and welcome to the Blackstone Secured Lending fourth quarter and full year 2023 investor call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. If you require operator assistance at any time, please press star zero. If you'd like to ask a question, please press signal by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Stacy Wang, head of stakeholder relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Katie. Good morning and welcome to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's fourth quarter and full year call. Earlier today, we issued a press release with a presentation of our results and filed our 10-K, both of which are available on the shareholder section of our website, www.bxsl.com. We will be referring to that presentation throughout today's call. I'd like to remind you that this call may include forward-looking statements which are uncertain and outside of the firm's control and may differ materially from actual results. We do not undertake any duty to update these statements. For some of the risks that could affect results, please see the risk factors section of our Form 10-K filed earlier today. This audio cast is copyright material of Blackstone and may not be duplicated without consent. With that, I'll turn the call over to BXSL's Co-Chief Executive Officer, Brad Marshall. Thank you, Stacy, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call this morning. Also with me today are Co-Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Bock and our President Carlos Whitaker and our Chief Financial Officer, Teddy Desloge. Turning to this morning's agenda, I will start with some high-level thoughts before turning it over to Jonathan, Carlos, and Teddy to go into more details on our portfolio and the fourth quarter results. Just turning to the slide deck that we posted, and if we start on slide four, BXSL reported another strong quarter of results, including growth in net investment income, increased net asset value, and continued solid credit performance. Several other key highlights in the quarter include the highest weighted average asset yield on the portfolio since inception at 12%, our second-best quarter of net investment income per share, and the busiest deployment period in two years. Net investment income, or NII, per share increased 1% quarter-over-quarter to $0.96 per share, which represented a 14.5% annualized return on equity. It is important to note, along with strong earnings, the quality of our earnings remains high with limited PIK payment, non-recurring, and fee-driven income. In fact, interest income, excluding PIK fees and dividends, represented 95% of our total investment income in the fourth quarter. BXSL maintained its dividend of $0.77 per share, representing an 11.6% annualized distribution yield, one of the highest among our traded BDC peers with as much of their portfolio in first-lien senior secured assets, while covering our fourth quarter dividend by 125%. We continue to focus on our mandate of protecting investors' capital by constructing a portfolio of first-lien senior secured loans. As of December 31st, BXSL's portfolio is 98.5% first-lien senior secured debt with a 48.2% average loan-to-value. We had strong credit performance supported by a minimal non-accrual rate below 0.1% at both amortized cost and fair market value, lowest among our traded BDC peers. Approximately 1.5% of our debt investments, as a percentage of total cost, are marked below 90. Turning now to page five of the presentation deck, in the fourth quarter, BXSL saw a meaningful increase in investment activity, ending the period with over $1 billion in new investment commitments and $874 million in new investment fundings. New investments funded in the quarter were over 98% first-lien, with a weighted average EBITDA of approximately $130 million and an average loan-to-value of 41.5%, reflecting our continued focus on what we believe are high-quality investments. In addition, the weighted average spread was approximately 580 basis points, with an average OID of 1.7% and nearly two years on average of call protection. From a market activity perspective, we see strength building as fourth quarter M&A volume increased to almost $400 billion, a 40% boost year-over-year. We expect M&A activity to continue to build and accelerate in 2024. This view is supported by our ongoing dialogues with the top financial sponsors that we cover as well as the sell-side advisors with whom we partner with. M&A activity is expected to be largely driven by the buildup in record levels of private equity dry powder, large amounts of unsold assets that sponsors are sitting on in older previous vintage funds, and the impact of lower M&A activity in 2023, 54% lower than the most recent peak in 2021. This expected market activity can be sustained by the prospect of lower interest rates and continued narrowing of bid-ask spreads between buyers and sellers. In addition, the number of deals in the Blackstone Credit and Insurance pipeline doubled as of the end of the fourth quarter versus the end of the first quarter. These pipeline deals are predominantly first-lien senior secured exposure in companies in historically recession-resilient sectors we know very well. While we know every opportunity in BXSL's pipeline will not convert into investments and our underwriting bar remains high, the volume gives us a sense for the scale and presence that we believe we have as an institution to drive deal flow. BXSL's origination pace benefits from the scale and platform of Blackstone, or BXCI, which is one of the world's largest alternative credit managers with $319 billion in assets under management and over 500 investment professionals in 18 offices globally. Our incumbency in over 4,500 corporate issuers allows us to see more deal flow, leverage our incumbency, and select into what we believe are the most attractive risk-adjusted assets. Further, BXCI has been the sole or lead lender in approximately 84% of BXSL's direct lending transactions since inception. This quarter alone, 12 of 17 BXSL's funded transactions were for deals Blackstone-led, which allows us to be in a position to drive the negotiation of terms and documentation. During the quarter, we issued nearly 330 million of common shares through our ATM offering. With additional equity and increased capacity for our debt, which has a weighted average cost of just over 5%, we remain very well positioned to take advantage of an improving M&A environment where we believe we can deploy capital and drive earnings for shareholders. 2023 was also our best year of performance since inception with a 14.7% return on NAV basis. And while a lot of that return was supported by higher rates, we believe there are multiple drivers of returns that could work in our favor in 2024. These drivers include sustained elevated interest rates despite potential cuts later this year, heightening credit spreads which could result in asset appreciation and refinancings in our first-lien senior secured portfolio, and lastly, as I just mentioned, additional potential income driven by increased M&A activity, which we are starting to see as evidenced by our fourth quarter activity. So with that, I will turn it over to Jonathan Bock. Thank you, Brad. Let's turn to slide six. We ended the quarter with $9.9 billion of investments, an increase from $9.5 billion in the third quarter. We also modestly delevered in the quarter at 1x debt to equity and averaging 1.05x in the quarter. Now, we enhanced our liquidity position this quarter to $1.8 billion. That's comprised of cash and available borrowing capacity across our revolving credit facilities, including ABLs, and that's to lean into an expanded pipeline. Now, our weighted average yield on debt investments at fair value was 12% this quarter compared to 11.9% last quarter. New investments continue to be accretive to investment income. The yields on both new debt investment fundings and assets repaid during the quarter averaged around 11.7%. Now, importantly, the weighted average base rate over the fourth quarter expanded approximately 120 basis points on our 98.9% floating rate debt portfolio compared to the same quarter in the prior year as rates remain elevated. Now, let's look at the portfolio and on slide seven. BXSL continued to focus on its defensive positioning in the current market environment, and this is reflected in our nonaccrual rate of less than 0.1% at cost and fair market value with no new nonaccruals in the quarter. As we look into 2024, we expect to see dispersion in performance across the market with defaults increasing in certain areas, particularly in smaller companies and businesses with cyclical and capital-intensive profiles, neither of which are within BXSL's investment focus. In addition, we expect that underperforming businesses with upcoming maturities where sponsors have taken value out could also face more challenges. And while we expect market defaults and nonaccruals to pick up modestly, fewer than 10% of BXSL's loans have maturities in the next 24 months, and liquidity profiles overall remain healthy. Now, further, 9% of BXSL's exposure to revolving credit facilities is drawn. And while we're pleased with our non-accrual rate, we continue to monitor our portfolio companies very closely, leveraging our team of 84 professionals in Blackstone Credit and Insurance's Chief Investment Office. Now, over 98% of BXSL's investments are in first-lien senior secured loans, and 99% of those loans are to companies owned by private equity firms or other financial sponsors who generally have access to additional equity capital. And equity owners of this type have historically shown a willingness to support borrowers. These sponsors have significant equity value in these capital structures with an average loan-to-value of 48.2% in BXSL. Now, to complement healthy credit fundamentals and what could be a lower interest rate environment later this year, our portfolio also starts from a very strong EBITDA base. Taking a look at slide eight, you can see why we view larger companies as higher-performing borrowers. Our portfolio companies generated an average of $192 million in LTM EBITDA, up from approximately $167 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2022, and more than 2x larger than the private credit market average. As we can see from the Lincoln International Private Market Database, a market resource on private credit markets overall, larger companies of $100 million or higher in EBITDA have experienced nearly 4x greater EBITDA growth and default nearly 5x less than when compared to true middle market transactions. And this is often said, "These companies are not simply good because they are big. We believe they are big because they are good." With our extensive sourcing capabilities and origination engine, we have the ability to identify and choose a broad array of investments that are, in our view, attractive risk-adjusted opportunities in a market environment where we're anticipating increased activity, as Brad outlined earlier. Now, slide nine focuses on our industry exposure, another important part of our defensive positioning where we like to focus on better investment neighborhoods. This means focusing on key sectors with, among other themes, lower default rates and lower CapEx requirements. This quarter, 30% of BXSL's deals were closed in the software industry as we continued to focus on more historically lower default rate industries. We increased the number of portfolio companies while maintaining nearly 90% invested in historically lower default rate industries, including software, healthcare providers and services, professional services, and commercial services and supplies, which are some of the highest exposures and highest conviction themes across the portfolio. On slide 10, we can see BXSL's portfolio company fundamentals compared to the private credit market as measured by Lincoln. And then looking relative to the private credit market, BXSL has approximately 2x our portfolio companies have approximately 2x higher growth rate and generate nearly 15% higher profitability. Now, we continue to stress the importance of interest coverage. Average LTM EBITDA coverage of interest for BXSL portfolio companies over the last 12 months was 1.8x in Q4, which again compares favorably to the Lincoln Database for the private credit market at 1.4x coverage in Q4. As we always say, the tails here are key. 6% of BXSL's portfolio reflected interest coverage below 1x compared to the market at 15% on an LTM basis. It is even more important to understand what's driving these tails and which companies comprise them. Now, if you're looking at the market, looking at their tail below 1x EBITDA coverage, more than 70% of the companies below 1x interest coverage are small with less than $50 million in EBITDA. Now, for BXSL, the majority of these companies are associated with recurring revenue loans, which were underwritten as higher growth names with lower initial coverage ratios. If you exclude recurring revenue loans from the analysis, BXSL's share of the portfolio below 1x interest coverage becomes less than 1% versus the market at 13%. Especially relative to the broader private credit market, we've seen our portfolio companies continue to deliver strong fundamental performance. Now, looking ahead, the market's expecting rates to begin to fall this year, current pricing implying an average SOFR rate in 2025 of 4.1%. Now, as many of you know, lower interest rates effectively lower the interest burden that's currently placed on our portfolio companies. And that, in turn, allows more free cash flow to equity holding all else equal. Rather than spend the free cash flow on interest payments, borrowers can reinvest excess cash into growth or prepare for a sale or refinancing. And to illustrate this point, running at a 4.1% average base rate through BXSL's portfolio as of Q4 2023, that implied a hypothetical increase in the portfolio's interest coverage ratio from 1.8x to 1.9x holding other data constant. Now, I'll conclude with some points on our documents and recent amendment activity. As Brad indicated, when we negotiate our credit agreements, especially when we're the leading lender, we place significant focus on ensuring important protections are put in place. Nearly 100% of the Blackstone-led deals held in BXSL include certain protections against asset stripping and collateral release and have caps on add-backs to EBITDA. This is in stark contrast to the syndicated market where the majority of loans lack these kinds of lender protections and which we believe have been a significant driver of depressed recoveries in liquid loans over the past year. Finally, amendment activity continues to be relatively benign. In the fourth quarter, in BXSL, there were 40 amendments, the vast majority of which were associated with add-ons, DDTL extensions, and other immaterial technical matter. Now, there were two other amendments associated with providing additional PIK flexibility and one amendment associated with an underperforming investment. Among the two PIK amendments, one was associated with a significant equity infusion by the PE sponsor, and the other was effectively extension on a PIK option provided at initial underwriting. Now, when we extended call protection on one of the deals by two years, and for the underperforming investment, we proactively engaged the PE sponsor who also contributed new equity. The amendment here was associated with recognizing additional equity in our covenant tests. With that, I'll turn it over to Carlos. Thanks, John. Turn to slide 11. BXSL maintained its dividend distribution of $0.77 per share, a 28% increase from Q4 of last year, and a 45% increase since our IPO two years ago. As you can see, we have continued to focus on delivering high-quality yield to shareholders, building a level of confidence through steady, regular dividends while also building NAV per share. We expect this approach to continue. As the economic environment shifts, it's important to look at the market as a whole. We expect private credit spreads to tighten as M&A increases, a trend we began noticing in late 2023. To expand on Brad's point regarding deal activity, we are optimistic about M&A volumes and the deployment picture for 2024. Valuation expectations have improved. Record private equity dry powder of $1.5 trillion is on the sidelines. Economic sentiment is improving. Fundamentals remain healthy. There is a new prospect for lower cost of capital if rates fall, all drivers for pent-up market activity. Given our broad origination platform and expansive credit footprint, we believe BXSL is well positioned to take advantage of this environment. Another benefit we offer is our scaled investment franchise, which allows us to drive investor returns, a main Blackstone focus. Recall, our value creation program, which all BXSL portfolio companies have access to, seeks to assist our companies by lowering their expenses and creating cross-sell opportunities across the broader Blackstone portfolio. We have created and implied $3.5+ billion of enterprise value for our BXCI companies in addition to being their lender. For example, we made over 20 introductions across the broader Blackstone ecosystem to a digital service provider and generated approximately $7 million in sales for this borrower. This included projects for enterprise architecture, an enterprise resource planning selection, cloud optimization consulting, and material requirements and planning, all directly with other Blackstone investments. We also worked with a management service provider for healthcare to put together a request for proposals for medical consumables. The request contained over 1,000 SKUs. And through this process, saved the borrowers almost $2 million. Again, we are just a lender here. To be able to provide such assistance is quite remarkable. It's a point worth emphasizing. As we provide BXCI value creation services that aim to add value to our companies, we offer our borrowers access to over 50 data scientists, over 90 senior advisors, and a team of cybersecurity experts, all of which we believe ultimately makes us an attractive manager to partner with. But all of this ties to our focus on shareholder experience and alignment. We built BXSL to help drive attractive risk-adjusted returns to shareholders with what we consider to be industry-leading best practices. Even after the expiration of our fee waiver, BXSL has among the lowest fee structures, expense ratios, and cost of debt relative to our peer set as a percentage of NAV and as of the end of Q4. This helps us to build a defensive portfolio and deliver returns to our investors. We have a three-year lookback or total return hurdle related to incentive fees on income. Importantly, we amortize OID over the life of the loan and do not scrape upfront fees to the manager by passing on all of BXSL's portion of investment-related fees fully to the fund. Another example of shareholder alignment and another way we aim to differentiate ourselves. With that, I'll turn it over to Teddy. Thank you, Carlos. I'll start with our operating results on slide 12. In the fourth quarter, BXSL's net investment income was $172 million or $0.96 per share, representing the second-highest NII quarterly performance since our IPO. GAAP net income in the quarter was $157 million or $0.88 per share, up 16% from a year ago. Our total investment income for the quarter was up $53 million or 21% year-over-year, driven by increased interest income primarily due to higher rates. Payment in kind or PIK income represented approximately 5% of total investment income during the quarter. We would also like to acknowledge that the fee waivers in place since our IPO expired near the end of October 2023. While this quarter included partial waivers for approximately 1/3 of the period, future quarters will fully incorporate BXSL's full management fee of 1% and its incentive fee of 17.5%. The partial waivers added approximately $0.02 of NII per share to the quarter. Turning to the balance sheet on slide 13, we ended the quarter with $9.9 billion of total portfolio investments at fair value, less than $5 billion of outstanding debt, and nearly $5 billion of total net assets. With our strong earnings in excess of the dividend in the quarter, NAV per share increased to $26.66, up from $26.54 last quarter. Next, slide 14 outlines our attractive and diverse liability profile, which includes 57% of drawn debt in unsecured bonds. These bonds have a weighted average fixed coupon of less than 3%, which we view as a key advantage in this elevated rate environment and contribute to an overall weighted average interest rate on our borrowings of just over 5%. Again, this compares to weighted average yield at fair value on our debt investments of 12%. Additionally, we have no maturities on our liabilities until 2026, and our funding facilities have an overall weighted average maturity of 3.4 years. As mentioned in our prior earnings call, BXSL was the first traded BDC to receive an improved outlook from stable to positive by Moody's. We continue to maintain our three investment-grade corporate credit ratings. We ended the quarter with approximately $1.8 billion of liquidity in cash and undrawn debt available to borrow, providing us with significant capacity for continued portfolio growth. The fourth quarter of 2023 was our most active quarter since 2021, with BXSL committing to over $1 billion in investments in the quarter that have closed to date, plus an additional $221 million committed to BXSL as of December 31st that have not yet closed. As you heard from Brad, John, and Carlos, we believe deal activity will increase in 2024 and create new deployment opportunities we are seeing that play through our pipeline. We also have seen spreads tighten and activity rise in the syndicated loan market, generally a leading indicator for what we expect to see on the private side. As such, we are actively leveraging incumbency to retain exposure where capital structures were set up in a wider spread environment while company performance has remained strong, exceeding expectations. For example, in the fourth quarter, we agreed to five repricings in the portfolio in exchange for an average of nearly two years of additional call protection. We are also finding success offering private solutions that are differentiating versus what the syndicated market can offer, such as refresh DDTL capacity or modest PIK flexibility. In conclusion, we remain positive about the year ahead, our competitive advantages in the market, and robust performance in various metrics against our peer sets. We believe the positive factors that have supported returns for investors remain in place, including portfolio positioning for a modestly lower but still elevated rate environment, ample liquidity to deploy into what we believe will be a more robust deal environment, and continued elevated earnings powered by low-cost financing sources, all of which is backed by Blackstone's platform advantages in scale and sourcing and our focus on protecting investors' capital. With that, I'll ask the operator to open up for questions. Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, star one if you would like to ask a question. We ask you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up to allow as many questions as possible. We'll go first to Finian O'Shea with Wells Fargo Securities. Hey, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for having me on. Interesting comment at the end by Teddy there on the repricings. I guess first, how many, if you can offer us color, happened post-quarter with the major BSL comeback? And then just higher level is I'm not sure repricing has been a concept in direct lending. If you could touch on if this is a market evolution that's kind of happening in real time. Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Fin. So on your first question, repricing activity has continued, not to an overly sort of material extent. I think if you look at the capital structures where we have agreed to repricings, some of these were set up at a clearly higher rate environment or higher spread environment. The average spread on the deals that we repriced in Q4 were just right around SOFR 615 inside of or outside of where the market is today. All of those were met with new call protection. So we make that trade to extend duration in the portfolio. Finian, it's Brad. I would say it is a bit of a new phenomenon. But you always have the option to take your capital back at your call protection. And that's why it's important to have call protection in deals. But on the higher quality assets, if they've delevered, we're usually okay with extending duration on those types of assets. Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. And then I guess for my follow-up, can you talk about the strategy with capital raising? Your leverage has gone from 1.30 to one over the course of the year, mostly on account of the ATM. It's. I know you gave some constructive comment on the deployment outlook, but it's not that meaningful yet. So are you still pedal to the metal post-quarter? And how are you looking at that today? Thank you. Hey, Finian. It's Bock. I'd outline that not a pedal to the metal focus. You size the equity capital based on the opportunity set as your forward pipeline develops. And you've seen and you've heard Brad's comments on the development of the forward pipeline. I think what it's outlining is that we have access to very high-quality investors through the ATM program, some of them are very large in nature. And our goal will be to ensure that we're sizing the equity growth to ensure that we're generating attractive return and so monitoring that on a daily or quarterly basis. So you're starting to see a build in pipe. You can expect to see a level of build-in capital, but you don't let that overwhelm the forward return. Hey, Finian. I'll just add to that. So I think we see things maybe a little bit before the market in terms of pipeline building and assets and deployment. You certainly saw some of that get reflected. As we said, the fourth quarter was our busiest quarter since 2021. So we are seeing a material uptick in activity. Some of that's being driven just by incumbency, not in the existing portfolio, but across our BXCI portfolio where we can kind of originate deals on a proprietary basis. Just to give you some stats, I think we said this, but the pipeline's about 2x larger than it was maybe six months ago. And even in the past couple of weeks, the deal flow coming in from sell-side advisors has more than doubled. We're always going to be thinking about our capital structure to make sure we can take advantage of what's in front of us. Recognize kind of your points. Leverage has come down. But again, it's on the back of very, very active investment activity in the fourth quarter. And we'll see how the first quarter develops. Thank you, Finian. Thank you. We'll go next to Ken Lee with RBC Capital Markets. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. In terms of the normalization of the broadly syndicated loan markets, wondering if you could just share your thoughts on how you think this could impact either the pace or the mix of new originations that you could be seeing this year? Thanks. So yeah, the broadly syndicated markets have been quite I wouldn't say active because most of the activity has been on repricings. There hasn't been much of a new calendar come to the market. But it has tightened quite a bit, probably by at least 50 basis points in the first couple of months of the year. And I would say the private markets are somewhat keyed off of the public market. So one could expect asset spreads coming in across the private market. We do have a pretty broad deal funnel globally, so we can pick our spots with BXSL. Again, the fourth quarter activity, the spreads were in line with the assets that we deployed. We're in line with the assets that came out. So we're kind of keeping pace. Spreads are both a positive and a negative. And so maybe just to hit on that, as spreads tighten, all else being equal, asset prices should increase. So it does have, and I said this in my comments, a little bit of an upward driver on the price of your existing assets. So that's positive. Lower spreads, lower rates does increase deal activity, market activity, or at least it should. And that creates more turnover and more fee acceleration. So that's another positive. And then, of course, it is a little bit of a headwind potentially on new assets. But even if 20% of your portfolio was being invested in this market has, what, 10 basis points of impact on the yield of the portfolio and the fees that you're getting on an accelerated basis more than offsets that. So there are some pros and cons. You will continue to see us pick our spots in this market with the benefit of having a really wide and deep deal funnel. Very helpful there. Just one follow-up, if I may. In terms of the activity that you're seeing in the pipeline, sounds pretty robust. Is there any particular drivers that you're seeing commonalities across the activity there, any particular sectors? Just want to get a little bit more color on what you're seeing there. Thanks. Yes. On the pipeline, I think the couple of things I would highlight is, first, similar sector exposures, as Bock mentioned. What we deployed in the fourth quarter is consistent to what we're seeing in the pipeline. Two is larger capital structures. So as Brad mentioned, double the volume, more than double the volume of larger than a billion-dollar transactions in the pipeline. I think, generally speaking, we are optimistic about the M&A environment this year. We see that early in our pipeline. I think one thing we do need to see is continued sort of narrowing between valuation between buyers and sellers. That's starting to happen. Certainly helps with the prospect of lower cost of capital on the horizon with, as Brad mentioned, spreads tightening modestly and then the prospect for lower rates coming down towards the back half of this year. Would I just add to that, Ken, is I would say at least half of our deal flow right now, we're going into the market and creating. So take Health Comp, which we did in the fourth quarter. We were the only capital provider that was around that. We were the incumbent. We had a strategic angle across our value-add group. We could do the whole capital structure. So these are the types of transactions that we're leaning into in this market. We committed to another deal this week that's fairly large, over $1 billion in size. And no one else kind of saw that deal. And these are some of the things I was trying to get across with my message on. Even in a market where the broadly syndicated activity is robust from a spread standpoint, we will continue to drive deal flow that's accretive to BXSL, in our opinion. So lots of different ways that we can kind of go about this. But that's where we're seeing deal flow, mostly from things that we're creating. Great. Very helpful there. Thanks again. Thank you, Ken. As a reminder, star one if you would like to ask a question. We'll go next to Melissa Wedel with JPMorgan. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions today. Wanted to also follow up on the comments about the pipeline and how rich that seems to be right now. I think that we've heard from a few different management teams that while there was a pickup sort of early this year, a lot of folks are expecting, particularly, increased volume in the back half of this year. Are you seeing anything differently than that? And then also, what does that imply for sort of repayments or exits to counter that? Are we seeing repay activity, or is this sort of a net originations environment? Thank you. I can do the repayment point because it ties to what Teddy mentioned as it relates to repricings. And then as it relates to the pipeline billing, Teddy can then build out those comments. So, Melissa, interestingly, as we're proactive both in sourcing deals and also proactive in defending them, you've seen both year-to-date or near-term repayment remain muted. And so that's a function of our view that an asset on our books, still at an attractive illiquidity and credit spread relative to our cost base, is a decision we're choosing to make. And so I'd say from a repayments perspective, we're trending better than expected. And then as it relates to deployment, I'll turn to my colleague. Yeah. I think consistent with Brad's comments, we're generally seeing deals earlier stage. A lot of what we're working on today are sell-side commitments prior to deal launching. So I think a lot of that does come to fruition in the back half of this year. In the meantime, there were a couple of situations, particularly last quarter, where sell-side processes, M&A processes, fell apart because of valuations. We were then able to show up with a sole financing source for a recap ahead of another process. So those are situations that we're very in front of. A lot of those, we have incumbency today, whether they're positions we have on the liquid side or private positions. Melissa, the activity picking up in the second half of this year, I would agree with that comment. But I think most of the comments are, "We hope that activity picks up in the second half," is what you're hearing from others. "Hope is not a strategy." So we're out trying to kind of develop our own deal flow in the absence of a more active M&A market. A logic holds true that activity should pick up. But we're certainly not going to sit back and wait for that to happen. And PE activity being light for the past two years, lots of dry powder, all that is very true. But I would look more towards our current comments, which are sell-side M&A inbounds to us have increased twofold. The pipeline, which Teddy's highlighted, is twice as large as it was not too long ago. Those are kind of the near-term things that we're seeing. Then, yes, we also hope that the broader market picks up. We'll go out and find deals in the absence of that. Understood. If I could follow up also on Fin's question, the repricings that you did, I think that's what you're referring to when you talk about finding the deals yourself and sort of being proactive. Are those deals that or companies that could have conceivably refinanced in the broadly syndicated market? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Melissa. Those deals were actually separate. So those deals were capital structures set up in a clearly wider spread environment. So average so far on those were 600 to closer to 625, where performance has exceeded our expectations from a credit perspective. Those did have some access to the public markets. We were able to reset call protection, extend duration on those. The deals that Brad was referring to were more public capital structures that actually see value in going private. And that was one of the deals that he was referring to that's closing shortly. There are ways that private lenders can differentiate from the syndicated market. We've been seeing that in our pipeline, certainly around delayed draw capacity, providing capacity for M&A, and certainty of execution. Those are some areas where we're seeing differentiation and where we can utilize those strengths to really drive our own deal flow. Melissa put some numbers to that. We have 100 deals that we identified at the end of the fourth quarter that we want to reverse into the company to try and create deal flow. They may have a maturity. They may need growth capital. They may prefer a more private capital structure. So even when the public markets are active, we can go in and create something that's a little bit more customized for them. And you can only do that if you have scale. So in a couple of deals we'll likely close shortly, they are well over $1 billion dollars will be the sole or the large majority anyways of those capital structures. We'll bring in some others. And you can only do that if you have incumbency across your platform. You can only do that if you have scale. You can only do that, obviously, if you have a more proactive mindset. That's great detail. Thank you. We'll go next to Casey Alexander with Compass Point. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. You talked about spreads appear to be tightening, and interest rates were actually down broadly in the fourth quarter, which should have been supportive for the general marks of the portfolio. So can you contour that against the $23 million of unrealized depreciation in the quarter and give us a feel for what caused that relative to what should have been a pretty good pricing environment? Yeah. I'm happy to take that. So the $23 million of unrealized depreciation, some of that was a reversal of unrealized appreciation that we saw as it relates to repayments, right? We had over $500 million of repayments in the quarter. That was an annualized repayment number of just over 20%. So when that happens, you do have a reversal of unrealized gains. That was about a 1/3 of the move. The other 2/3 were offset by some markups in the portfolio as well. I think spreads from a valuation perspective in the quarter were actually relatively flat. I think most of the spread tightening that we've seen that we're committed to in the quarter are deals that likely won't close until the first quarter or the second quarter of this year. I think there's still some room to go on spreads tightening and haven't fully seen that reflected in the marks today. Yeah. Rates shouldn't impact marks, Casey. So it's more just the spreads, and the spreads have come in more in the first quarter. I'd give you a couple of other stats. Only 1.1% of the portfolio is marked below 90. That would be the list of assets that were most focused on. 8.8% is below 95. So portfolio is still in really good shape, but we mark our assets to market. And so you're seeing that in some movements up and some movements down. Okay. Thank you for that. And then secondly, maybe a minor point, but there was a reasonable rise in PIK income versus the third quarter. It's about 5% of total investment income now. Can you give us a feel for how that fits into the rest of your comments earlier today? Yeah. I'm happy to take that. So PIK income was up modestly. It was up about a percentage point from 4%-5% in the quarter. I don't know if there's anything specific to point out there. We had one position that did roll off in the quarter that had PIK flexibility that paid full cash. Offsetting that, we did have a couple smaller PIK amendments where we agreed to it. It is an area, I think, over time where you can see for higher-performing situations, low LTV, in good sectors with good fundamentals, it's an area where you can see a little bit of differentiation from the syndicated market. So I think there's a difference between PIK because of underperformance versus PIK due to new deals or differentiation versus the public markets. And again, I'll just add some numbers to that. So we had a couple smaller ones get added, and then four dropped. The ones that got added, the average mark of those assets is 97, approximately. So just to give you a sense that they're kind of performing assets. They're marked in and around cost, but they've elected part of their PIK option. I still think 5%, Casey, is probably at the low end of the industry. So no trend that you're seeing other than as rates stay high, companies have the option. They're going to use it. All right. Thank you for taking my questions. Thank you. We'll go next to Mark Hughes with Truist. Yeah. Thanks. Good morning. You talked about the new deals this quarter, I think, $130 million on average. Your overall norm is $190+ million. Was anything to that? Notwithstanding, you talked about some bigger deals that are out there. Did you find a little more attractive pricing at maybe the lower middle end of the market? Yeah. I don't think there's anything specific to point out there. We have seen growth in the existing portfolio, organic and M&A growth, which is driving growth of our existing deals. There were a handful of deals that we closed that were sort of sub-$120 million that were still very high quality. So really, no change in strategy to point out there. And then anything in your healthcare exposure you want to highlight or not highlight given some of the events in the industry, some other credit issues? Yeah. I think the healthcare exposure is one area where we spend a lot of our time. We do have a team that's specialized in healthcare that sits in our investment team. We see everything. I think the areas overall where we see stress are what we've mentioned before, business models with high components of labor inflation, business models that are more tied to regulatory pressure, or business models that are more commoditized. Where we've focused our capital is really on more specialized models that aren't seeing much of that pressure. There are a couple of situations we are focused on that are roll-ups that have a little bit more cash flow constraint as rates are higher, but overall, seeing relatively good performance in that part of the portfolio. And Mark, to add to that, if you think about it, while we're insulated from a lot of the trends you might have seen in other PPMs or physicians' practice, we're not completely immune. And to the extent that you see an area where we're named, where there can be an indicative level of stress, that's also found and reflected in the mark. So we're very focused on those situations. Clearly, they're very small, but at the same time, we always want to ensure that that level of stress is reflected in the marks, which you can see in the SOI. Appreciate that. Thank you. We'll take our final question from Paul Johnson with KBW. Yeah. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Just Brad sort of answered my question here in terms of the opportunity that you see in the portfolio in terms of repricing. But I guess you identified 100 deals. I mean, would you describe that as pretty meaningful in the portfolio in terms of driving the pipeline, or is that more or less kind of just low-hanging fruit that you expect to be picked relatively quick? And then also on that, one more question is just how much work, I guess, is it to execute a repricing transaction? Is it just kind of a matter of calling on the sponsor and discussing the repricing, or do you basically effectively re-underwrite the transaction? Yeah. And Paul, just to reiterate what Teddy mentioned, there is a distinct difference between repricings and reverse deal flow. Repricings is you own the asset. The sponsor reaches out, says, "Hey, we know we have call protection, but you want you to reprice." And we either say yay or nay. We usually ask for something in exchange, usually reset the call protection if we say yay. Reverses are entirely different. These are things that we don't own, that we're going into the market. We're trying to create new deals. And in those situations, if there was 100 of those deals, we've actually gone through 33 of them through our kind of review process and reached out to the sponsors. 80% of those, they've said, "No, not yet," or, "Pricing's too high." And so they go back on the shelf. And the other ones we're working through. It's very different. If you think about our platform, we are invested in BXCI in over 3,000 companies. We can mine our portfolios. We can create ideas. We can play the role of banker with a balance sheet. It's a highly differentiated platform than almost anyone in the market. And that's what we're focused on from a reverse standpoint. Very different than the repricing exercise that we'll invariably kind of have to go through as the market strengthens. Thanks for that, Brad. It's a very helpful description there. And then last one, I have to ask just because it happens every four years. I mean, how do you expect, I guess, the election to kind of play into the pipeline this year? Do you think that will prompt any more transactions ahead of the election? I mean, just what do you kind of expect from sponsor behavior, if anything? Yeah. I don't think we know. In election year, you should see deal flow get pulled forward because people are worried about change and volatility. So if you look at kind of past history, that is what happens. And I guess we're seeing a pickup in the pipeline that would suggest that that will hold true. But unclear kind of if that's an accelerator or more the fact that private equity sponsors have been sitting on the sidelines for a couple of years. So we'll wait and see. Thank you, Paul. Thank you. That will conclude our question-and-answer session. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to Ms. Wang for any additional or closing remarks. Thank you. This concludes our fourth-quarter call. Thank you so much for dialing in, and we look forward to speaking to you next quarter.