Good morning, and thank you for joining the Cadence Bank Q1 2022 earnings conference call. We have our executive management team here with us this morning, Dan, Paul, Chris, Valerie, and Hank. Our speakers will be referring to prepared slides during the discussion. You can find the slides by going to our investor relations page at ir.cadencebank.com, where you'll find them on the link to our webcast, or you can view them at the exhibit to the 8-K that we filed yesterday afternoon. These slides are also in the presentations section of our investor relations website. I would remind you that the presentation, along with our earnings release, contain our customary disclosures around forward-looking statements and any non-GAAP metrics that may be discussed this morning. Now I'll turn to Dan Rollins for his opening comments. Morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss Cadence Bank's Q1 2022 financial results. Paul and I will cover a few highlights this morning, as well as provide an update on our integration efforts. Valerie will discuss the financial results in more detail. Chris and Hank will provide some additional color on our frontline efforts. After we conclude our prepared comments, our executive management team will be happy to answer questions. It is an interesting time in our industry, given the economic trends, including the rate environment and inflationary pressures, as well as the political instability overseas. We are frequently asked questions about how these dynamics are impacting our business as well as our customers. While we are watchful for the possible impacts of these issues, I am pleased with the strength and stability of our footprint, and specifically our customers. We continue to be pleased with our fundamental operating performance, including our growth efforts. We reported net income available to common shareholders for the quarter of $112.6 million or $0.60 per diluted share, and adjusted net income available to common shareholders of $121.6 million or $0.65 per diluted common share. The only material non-operating item this quarter was just over $10 million in merger-related expenses. Importantly, credit quality continues to be a bright spot for us. We reported net recoveries of $400,000 for the quarter, which marks the fourth consecutive quarter we've been able to post net recoveries. We also reported a 22% decline in non-performing loans and leases during the quarter from an already relatively low position. From a balance sheet perspective, we reported net organic loan growth of over $300 million or 4.6% annualized and total deposit and customer repo growth of over $750 million or 7.7% annualized. Our loan growth this quarter was primarily within our C&I portfolio, while the deposit growth, which has historically been seasonally high in the first quarter, was primarily driven by growth in non-interest DDA balances, which is a positive for us. From a capital management perspective, we repurchased just over 5,000,000 shares during the quarter, and our board increased the common dividend to $0.22 per share per quarter, marking the 10th consecutive year of dividend increases. I believe both of these actions demonstrate our board and management team's confidence in the future of the new Cadence Bank. Paul, I'll let you add some comments. Thanks, Dan, and good morning to everyone. I continue to be very pleased with the progress we're making. The benefits of our merger from our customer, shareholders and teammates' standpoint all feel very positive to me. From talking to others around the industry, it feels like our cultural fit is probably ahead of where some of other deals are. We're working well together and collaboration is very high. We've done extensive planning and testing for our conversion, which is in line with our original timeframe, expecting to do our conversion in the early fourth quarter of this year. We're seeing pretty positive growth for customers really throughout the footprint. Texas and Florida stood out this quarter from a community bank standpoint, and our corporate and specialty teams reported nice growth throughout the footprint. As I spend time with our bankers, we're making a lot of calls. We're out knocking on doors. We've returned to the office. It's a bit of a hybrid model, but we're out looking for, of course, loans, deposits, but assets under management and more insurance business. We're doing a lot of blocking and tackling, and the key notion here is that core growth is a key driver of shareholder value, and we're very determined and focused on delivering that. With that, I'll turn it over to Valerie. Great. Thank you, Paul. Turning to this quarter's results, slide four provides a view of our summary income statement. Just as a reminder, with the October 29th closing of our merger, the Q1 of 2022 is the first reporting period that we've had a full quarter of the combined results of both legacy Cadence and legacy BancorpSouth. I would also remind you that Q4 of 2021 results were adversely impacted by the day one provision for credit losses and other merger-related items. For the Q1, we reported GAAP net income for the quarter of $112.6 million or $0.60 per diluted share, and adjusted net income of $121.6 million or $0.65 per diluted share. Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue, or PPNR, was $160 million or 1.36% of average assets. There are three key themes as you look at our results for the quarter. First, our continued loan growth has allowed us to grow net interest income and see positive movement in our margins. Second, our non-interest revenue businesses are performing very well. Third, credit quality continues to remain strong, supporting the lack of provision for credit losses for the quarter. As shown on slide five, we reported net interest income of $312 million and a net interest margin of 2.92% for the Q1, up from 2.90% in the Q4 of 2021. Excluding the impact of accretion, the linked quarter net interest margin increased by 3 basis points. The yield of net loans, excluding accretion, was 3.96% for the Q1, down 10 basis points from the linked quarter, primarily due to the full quarterly impact of the legacy Cadence variable rate loan portfolio, C&I portfolio. Similarly, the full quarter's merger impact drove our securities yield higher and funding costs lower, offsetting the decline in loan yields. Our total cost of deposits declined to 15 basis points for the quarter. As we look forward, our balance sheet is well-positioned to benefit from rate increases, with 69% of our loan portfolio floating or variable. Slides six and seven provide some additional color on our non-interest revenue and non-interest expense. Included in non-interest revenue, this quarter's insurance commission revenue benefit from seasonality, a high retention rate, and new customer wins. Mortgage banking revenue increased largely due to the impact of rising interest rates on our MSR assets. As we look at our expenses for the quarter, Q1 is generally seasonally high as a result of resets of payroll taxes and 401(k) match, as well as higher commissions linked to seasonally higher insurance revenue. Even so, the quarter's adjusted efficiency ratio was stable at 63.5%, and we continue to expect full realization of the merger efficiencies during 2023. While not related to the Q1, we did announce an increase of our minimum wage to $18 per hour, effective the beginning of April, as we continue to see wage pressure, particularly in some of our larger markets. Before turning it over to Chris, I would like to touch briefly on the changes in tangible book value. Like many others in the industry, our tangible book value was impacted this quarter by the AOCI marks on our available for sale securities portfolio due to the rising rate environment. To help clarify the impact, we have disclosed tangible book value per share, both including AOCI and excluding it. Excluding AOCI, tangible book value per share of $19.29 actually increased during the quarter, despite our active share repurchases. It is also important to remember what drove this quarter's change in AOCI is simply a change in fair valuation, driven by interest rate changes. This fair value adjustment does not impact our regulatory capital ratios in any way. I'll turn it over to Chris for a little more on our business activity for credit. Chris? Thanks, Valerie. Good morning, everyone. I would like to expand on the three key highlights for the quarter mentioned by Valerie: loan growth, credit quality, and non-interest revenue growth. As reflected on slide eight, we reported net organic loan growth for the quarter of just over $300 million or 4.6% annualized, coming primarily in our C&I book. Hank will make some additional comments on the loan growth efforts in a moment, but as Paul mentioned, we saw nice growth in our Texas and Florida markets within the community bank and across our footprint in the corporate banking and specialty lending units. Credit quality continues to be a positive story for us, which is highlighted on slide 10. As Dan mentioned, we reported net recoveries of $400,000 for the quarter, which marks the fourth consecutive quarter of reported net recoveries. Our total non-performing loans declined to $34.5 million or 22% during the quarter, bringing period end NPLs to net loans and leases to 44 basis points, while non-performing assets also experienced a similar decline. Non-interest revenue, which is highlighted on slide 13, shows insurance having a nice quarter and reporting total commission revenue up $36 million for the quarter or 17% for the Q1 of last year. Growth came primarily in our property and casualty portfolio as retention rates remain high and as we also picked up some nice customer wins. Mortgage reported origination volume of $804 million for the quarter, with just over 70% being purchase money. While we are pleased with production volume, rising rates do pressure our gain on sale margin, which is 1.24% for the Q1. Finally, I'd like to highlight our wealth and trust teams, which reported revenue for the quarter of $21.7 million. I'd also like to highlight that this revenue number is up from $8.4 million for the same quarter of 2021 and reflects the contribution of the legacy Cadence Trust and Wealth Services and the Linscomb & Williams results. We're really excited about the synergies the combined companies bring to our non-interest revenue lines and the future benefits from the cross-selling opportunities, additional scale and market diversification created by the merger. I will turn the call over to Hank for some comments on the corporate side of the bank. Hank? Thank you, Chris. I was pleased to see the commercial loan growth in the quarter was spread throughout the corporate C&I teams across the footprint. Our bankers have been leveraging the expanded platform and bringing in more wins as the economy stabilized post-COVID. Specialized lending and renewable energy teams have been quite active. Other areas are seeing payoffs slow, and we have the teams in place to continue growth. I am feeling positive about the growth this year as pipelines remain healthy. In particular, our technology, healthcare, and C&I groups are seeing attractive opportunities in our combined markets and throughout the footprint. We are adding good CRE projects from our community bank and corporate CRE teams, primarily in multifamily housing. Construction loans continue to fund, but we are still seeing lower utilization. Given the volatility in long-term interest rates, we do anticipate utilization in our construction portfolio to increase over the next 12-24 months to more normal or historical levels. Our focus on credit continues to be disciplined. We are not competing at higher leverage points with non-banks on leveraged loans. The markets continue to be competitive, but the pressure on terms and pricing seems to have settled some. Our teams have come together nicely, and I'm encouraged by the enthusiasm and commitment. I am also an optimist and excited about many great successes to come for our organization. Operator, our team is now ready to answer any questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw from the question queue, please press star then two. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you have additional questions, you may re-enter the question queue. The first question comes from Jon Arfstrom of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks. Good morning, everyone. Hey, Jon. You talk a little bit about overall growth expectations for the company. I saw you put up $300 million in organic growth, and just, you know, there's a lot of churn between the two companies, I would guess. Just, you know, talk a little bit about your expectations, and is that a reasonable pace, or do you expect that can accelerate a bit? I'll let everybody jump in on that. There's lots of activity going on the growth side of the house. There has been some churn. We continue to see payoffs on CRE flow through. There's just a lot of activity. Pipelines are also big. Hank and Chris, you guys are driving some of that, see what you add in. Yeah, Jon, I appreciate the question. As I mentioned earlier, it's a lot of balanced growth. The pipelines continue to be strong in my opinion. I think that, you know, with some of the areas like in our renewable energy and certainly the energy component of our bank with prices where they are, some opportunities there. The C&I teams are just getting a lot of looks, and the activity is high. Chris, you want to add something to that? Yeah, just with rates trending up, that's probably going to slow down some of the churn, especially on the community bank refinance side. But it also could impact maybe opportunities as folks are, you know, looking at higher interest rates on their projects until that factors in. How's that for right down the middle of the fairway for you? We have some pretty significant unfunded construction lines out there. Right. We do. Yeah, there's some activity going on, Jon. We're excited about what the team's been able to do in light of all the changes that we keep throwing out. Okay. Feels good, maybe a little bit better is a good summary. I think we feel excited about the opportunities. Okay. Plenty of other places I could go, but just as long as we're on this topic. Hank, you talked about the competitive environment being settled some, and I think that's somewhat encouraging. Others have said it's ultra-competitive. Can you give us a little bit more in terms of examples of what you're seeing there? Sure. You know, we're in a competitive business, and it's always competitive. Yeah. Where I see some slowdown is, you know, we obviously in CRE, we saw rates fall dramatically over the last 24 months. That seems to have settled down. We're not chasing terms, and leverage points on EV and other areas that we compete in are modest or where I would say historically, we're not chasing at this point. I feel pretty good about where we are from a terms and pricing, but it is competitive. A little bit of color there, and to bring the two companies together, there's a lot more emphasis or just the market and type of customer base on the CRE side for legacy Cadence. That's floating rates, so that's a nice pickup for us, especially in the rate environment we're moving into. We are still seeing, you know, in the community bank markets, you know, upward pressure on rates there. Everybody's holding. It's still pretty competitive out there. As recently as last month, we saw some three handles, but now you're seeing all that move into the four, kind of a four handle side, not as many three handles. So good upward pressure on the rate feel as well. Okay. All right. Thanks, I appreciate it. Thanks, Jon. The next question is from Catherine Mealor of KBW. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Just wanted to stay on the loan conversation and talk about loan yields. Maybe it's for Valerie, just kind of walk us through, you mentioned 69% of your loan book is floating or variable. Can you just walk us through to remind us what percentage now today is floating immediately? You know, once we get past, let's just say we get 50 basis points in May, so then we're kind of three rate hikes through, how much are kind of coming off the floors? The timeline on the remaining variable piece of the portfolio, just to kind of get a sense as to how quickly we should see these loan yields move higher. Thanks. Yeah, absolutely. Thanks, Katherine, for the questions. Great questions. You know, back, you know, last quarter, we said that it would take about 40 basis points movement in order to get our loans in average off the floors, the $7.5 billion or so that we had on the floors. Well, we've had a whole lot of that movement actually in the market take place already. You know, the next movement will definitely get those off their floors. We do have about $7.6 billion of our loan portfolio that is actually floating. That's, you know, less than 30 days. You know, 28% of that book. When you look at the total book, you know, we've got about 50% of our entire portfolio that will reprice over the next year. That, you know, gives you a little bit better timing on some of that, with most of that actually, you know, coming in the next three month period. Again, that, you know, positions us really nicely as we look at, you know, some of the increases that we expect coming down the road. When you take a look at some of the portfolio, we are starting to see, you know, the impact of some of the rate increases on some of the renewals come through as not only renewals, but also loans that are simply just repricing, starting to see that come through, and we'll definitely see that impact more in the Q2. New loans on average are coming on, you know, around the 3.60% level, but again, about 2/3 of those are variable rate, and so those will continue to move. Does that help what you were looking for? Yes, that's super helpful. Thank you. My next question is on some of the expenses. Fully appreciate that this quarter is kind of elevated because it's a 1 Q elevation, and then, you know, we don't have the full impact of the cost savings in. Can you just kind of help us think, take a step back, big picture. Like, maybe what's a good quarterly run rate we should get to kind of by the end of the year once we have the cost savings fully baked in, or any kind of guidance you could give us on where you think the expense run rate is going, just to make sure we're all on the same page. Thanks. Remember, we're on a 4Q integration plan, so I don't know that we'll have a good clean run rate in 4Q. I would put that out there first. I think we expect 1Q to be, you know, fully baked in, as we get into 4Q, and, as Paul said, we're on schedule, we're on task. We've actually completed two huge hurdles just in the last month and a half working towards our full integration. But you're right, 1Q expense run is high. There's lots of things that are in there just naturally. When you look at the things we were doing through the merger, I feel pretty confident that we're on our run rate to meet or exceed the numbers that we put out there. Valerie's been looking numbers up while I've been talking. Yeah. You know, I think what might help, you know, I know that the Q1 has a lot of noise, and of course, the Q4 was very noisy given the timing of the merger date. Last quarter, we disclosed our combined Q3 of 2021 expenses. On an adjusted basis, you know, that was $277 million compared to the Q1 adjusted expenses of $281 million. You know, as we talked about, this first quarter did have the resets of the 401(k) match and the payroll taxes. If you normalize that, and then we also had a bonus that we provided to a number of our employees for inflationary purposes in the first quarter. That amounted to about $2.8 million. When you combine all of that together, effectively Q3 2021 to Q1 2021, expenses actually came down about $7.4 million. That'll give you a little bit of a sense of, you know, some of the initial incremental merger cost saves that we're starting to see kind of in the underlying foundation. You know, that being said, it's gonna be bumpy until we get through this conversion. You know, we do have, we talked about we did increase our hourly wage to $18 per hour. We also have our merit increases in the July first time period. All that'll be a little bit bumpy until we do get finished with the conversion. Of course, none of this includes savings from any branch efficiencies, and then certainly some of the savings that we know will come after we, you know, are running on one operating system. The wage pressure is still big. Valerie hit two topics there you wanna make sure we cover again. We did change our incoming wage minimum to $18 an hour on April 1st. That's a pretty big run rate. That's gonna be close to $10 million on an annual run to plug that in. Our normal merit cycle for everyone that wasn't in that group hits on July 1. We will see some upward pressure on comp, even excluding the savings and the drop-offs that are there. You saw a headcount drop in the quarter, and we continue to see some of that. As Valerie said, it's gonna be bumpy as we move down the path. Great. I truly appreciate that, and it's very helpful. Thank you. Thanks, Catherine. The next question is from Jennifer Demba of Truist. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Hey, Jennifer. Hi. Just curious, the asset quality is very, very strong, but what do you think are the most vulnerable loan buckets, as rates go up and most susceptible here to rising loan losses over the next several quarters? Yeah, that's a good question. This was our fourth consecutive quarter of net recoveries. We haven't experienced a whole lot of losses lately. I guess, you know, looking forward is an important piece of that. I don't know that I have one bucket that I would want to call out. Paul, you got anything you wanna add to that? Well, I would just observe that really the merger is a huge de-risking of both balance sheets and diversification of the loan portfolio. Yeah, like Dan, I wouldn't point to any one category as higher risk. I think the risk is well managed across the company. I would say maybe the previous higher risk energy portfolio has been de-risked significantly with higher rates. As we're seeing, you know, profitability in the E&P sector is, you know, spectacular, and that, of course, benefits the midstream and the oilfield service portfolio. It's a granular, very diverse credit profile and one of the key reasons why we like the combination so much. You know, from a credit quality perspective, this is the best credit we've been posting for either of us in quite some time. I would just add to that. When you look at the balance sheets of the businesses, they're extremely strong. A lot of liquidity there. I think we're well-positioned if we do have some bumps in the quarters to come from an economic perspective and with rates increasing, but I think we're well prepared for that, and I think our borrowers are as well. What do you think a normal range of annual loan losses is for this company over an economic cycle? I don't have a number to stick onto that. I mean, that's a good question. Valerie, you wanna add? Yeah, I think that's a little bit of a challenging number. You know, as far as like annualized net charge-offs, legacy Cadence, you know, we would guide toward a 25 basis point normalized over a period of time net charge-offs. I'd say that's lower than the legacy BancorpSouth history. Yeah. Something below those lines. When you look at the COVID stress test and some of the portfolios that you might have been concerned about hospitality at legacy BancorpSouth, you know, I mean, it just came through with great marks. I think Valerie's on the right path. You know, 25 might have been sort of what we thought about for K, but something less than that. Combine that, I don't know, 10-15, but hard to hit a narrow range. We're clearly watching the clouds that are out there. I mean, I think your question is fair. You know, that it appears that there could be some economic headwinds that were there. We're hoping that they blow by, and we don't experience some of that, but we have to be prepared for that. Thanks so much. Thanks, Jenny. The next question is from Michael Rose of Raymond James. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. So it looks like the buybacks were weighed towards the back half of the quarter. As we move forward, just given the drop in TCE, and I understand the conversation, Valerie, about, you know, the mechanics of the AOCI hit. You know, would that, you know, give any sort of pause to, you know, future repurchases and, you know, should the stock remain under, you know, pressure? Is there capacity at this point, do you think, to actually increase the size of the repurchase? Thanks. Yeah. I think a couple of things. Valerie can certainly jump in here. You know, when you look at the tangible book value excluding AOCI, we were actually up in the quarter. AOCI, to use another word, would be transitory. You know, over time, neither one of us have had a habit of trading in that portfolio, so that will work its way through over time. The fact that the tangible book value went up excluding that, which is on page four of the deck, I think is a positive thing. I think we want to be opportunistic on buyback. I don't think we want to be locked out of the market, but I also think we need to be cognizant of all the moving pieces, which includes AOCI. Valerie. Yeah. No, I think you've really hit on all the points. You know, I think certainly we've always been opportunistic in the past. You know, the first quarter was pretty heavy activity. You know, it may be a little bit more measured going forward, but again, we have a history, and I anticipate that we'll continue to be opportunistic and do what makes the most sense. Balancing, you know, all the other things that we have going on. Obviously, loan growth continues to be picking up, and so that is obviously another primary use of capital. Understood. Thanks. Then just on the accretion this quarter, obviously it was a little bit higher than I think I was looking for at least. I understand how much you have left. Was there any sort of accelerated pay downs in there? You know, I think you might have given a schedule or expectation last quarter that we should kind of expect on a go-forward basis. Yeah. Yeah, that's a good question. There was a little bit of accelerated accretion there. You know, that tends to be bumpy. You know, we're still looking at, oh, gosh, probably about $25 million, $30 million of additional accretion as we go through the rest of the year in scheduled. But again, I would anticipate that it's probably gonna end up being a little bit more of that simply because of payoffs. Understood. Maybe just finally for me, just two kind of quick housekeeping questions. You know, with the conversion coming in the Q4, I assume a lot of the cost saves will come in and around there. How much of the cost saves have you realized to date? Because I think you'd targeted 75% for this year. Then just on the one-time cost, any changes there? I think you'd originally estimated $125 million. Any changes there? How much have you recognized to date? Thanks. Yeah. I don't know that there's any change in any of those numbers is the quick answer there. I think the one-time cost, those are hard for you to see sometimes because some of those costs were incurred pre-closing, on the seller side. You don't see all of that flowing through. We had a relatively low number this quarter. I would suspect that we will see some increasing cost as we move into the next couple of quarters because we have some things we've got to spend money for through that computer conversion in 4Q. From a cost save perspective, I think we feel like we're in really good shape to hit or exceed the numbers that we put out there. You're right. As you're looking out to the back half of the year, the biggest pieces of it will fall off in the Q4. There's little pieces that have been coming along all the way through. You know, early on, I said we had converted our mortgage shop all onto the same origination platform early in the year. We're in the process of converting the mortgage servicing onto the same platform here in the not too distant future. I mentioned a minute ago that we've passed now two pretty big hurdles. We actually upgraded and moved our main processing box just over the past weekend. That puts us in a position to be able to do what we need to do that way. We've also upgraded our card processing, all the transactions that flow through on the debit card, credit card side. Hundreds of thousands of transactions a day are flowing through, and that was all upgraded just in the last month. We're making great progress towards the conversion in the Q4, and I think we're very confident we'll hit our numbers. Yeah. The only other thing I would really add to that is, you know, we've incurred about $55 million-ish or so pre-tax. When you look at the Q4, Q1, and then actually looking back at the Q3 of 2021, some of that was, you know, a little bit early. So, you know, there—as Dan put it, there will be some more. We may end up beating that estimated overall cost. Beating as in coming in less? Coming in less. That's a good clarification. Again, as Dan put it, there's a lot of activity happening in the latter half of this year. Great. Progress continues. Thanks for taking all my questions. Thanks, Michael. Good to hear from you. The next question is from Brad Milsaps of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Hey, Brad. Hey, good morning, Dan. Thanks for taking my questions. Not to continue to belabor the cost thing, but just kind of wanted to put a finer point on it. Valerie, it sounded like you said that, you know, from the Q3 to the Q1, your expenses would have been down maybe $7 million from cost savings. I think you initially identified maybe $20 million quarterly. You're gonna spend another $2.5 million a quarter kind of on inflationary items. Kind of back of the envelope, would that leave you sort of $10 million to kind of fall out of the quarterly run rate, all else equal as you get past the conversion date? Does that math still make sense? I'll have to run that through my brain again. Yeah. You know, post conversion, as we look into 2023, we do anticipate achieving all of the cost saves that we laid out in, you know, the document. We talked, we made the announcement. That's $78 million. And then obviously we have talked about the impact of the $18 per hour is about $10 million per year. You know, there's obviously a little bit of, you know, puts and takes throughout there, but you can count on us achieving those merger cost saves. We're committed to that. Okay [crosstalk] great. From a big picture perspective, Brad, when you look at us, I think we're still very encouraged that the merger gives us the opportunity to cost out. The wage pressure that we're feeling, that's affecting all of us. That's nothing unique to our company. Everybody is feeling that. The pressure that's on NSF OD fees for the industry is impacting all of us, not just us. There are certainly some industry things that are impacting us. We as a standalone, we think that the ability to wring cost out through our merger is a real positive for us, and we'll meet or exceed probably both sides of those numbers. Great. Thank you. Just as my follow-up, Valerie, could you talk about maybe plans for the existing remaining liquidity that you have, you know, sitting in Fed funds? Do you plan to, you know, pour that into the bond portfolio with rates higher or, you know, just kind of wait and see with what loan growth does? Just kind of curious kind of how to think about, you know, the size of the balance sheet and kind of the different categories going forward. Yeah, absolutely. Q1 has a lot of seasonality on our deposits. We do have a number of large municipal customers who, you know, with the tax inflows, come in, and then, you know, you see those come out in the Q2. Part of that liquidity will certainly be to offset some of that volatility and some of that seasonality shift that we will see or we anticipate seeing in the Q2. Obviously, you know, using those funds for the loan growth is first and foremost. It's really going to be, you know, effectively, what's left over and making sure then that we invest it properly. We do have a lot of cash flow coming off that securities portfolio, about $700 million per quarter. You know, that helps fund a whole lot of loans, but also may allow for some reinvestment at some higher rates. Over time, you know, we would like to get the securities book as a percent of assets down as a percent, but that's going to take some time, given where we are today. The loan guys need to make more loans. Absolutely. Great. Thank you very much. Thanks, Brad. The next question is from Kevin Fitzsimmons of D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everyone. Hey, good morning, Kevin. Hey, Dan, I just wanted to ask about, it seems like there was a change in treatment on the MSR adjustment, and I definitely recognize that some peers don't break that out and exclude it. It is, you know, on one hand, you got hurt by rising rates on the AOCI, so it doesn't seem fair to just arbitrarily decide to exclude that. It had been your practice or legacy BancorpSouth practice to exclude it when talking about core performance. I'm just curious about, is this a change going forward and how you're going to view it? What would the puts and takes in deciding to keep that within core earnings? Thanks. Yeah, that's a great question, and you're spot on. I think when we look back over time when we started pulling that out at legacy BXS, it was a big part of the number. It's become more and more immaterial in our process as we've grown. We've been looking at what peers are doing and what's out there, and so we did pull that out of our adjusted numbers, and we also adjusted the adjusted numbers looking backwards. What you see in the deck is all uniform across. You're right, we've left it in because it's a much less material number today than it was, you know, when we started adjusting for it as a much smaller organization when we were $10 billion. That'll be a consistent treatment as we go forward. Okay, great. Can you just give us a sense for, you know, how to view the ACL and where that settles going forward. On one hand, you know, I think you guys might have given it before there on a combined basis, what your day one CECL might have been. On the other hand, we have a little more uncertainty today just with inflation and geopolitical things. Just wondering how to view that ACL going forward, what we should expect. Thanks. That's a really good question that doesn't have a very good answer in that you're exactly right. There's a lot of moving parts. The future risk that's out there is the dark clouds. If you're looking at history, you know, four quarters in a row of net recoveries would tell you that, you know what, that's credit's in really fine shape. But what the future is bringing to us is the unknown, and so to be prepared for that. I don't know that we have a number to tell you where I think that it would shake out, but we're certainly watching our modeling. You know, we're making sure we're accounting for the potential risks that are out there. I guess put it another way. I mean, I would suspect there's still opportunity for credit leverage for that ratio to come down, but maybe less aggressively than it might have been able to or we might have thought a quarter ago, if that's fair. I think that's probably fair. I think the unknown is what's happening in the economy with an inverted yield curve and, you know, potential, you know, military skirmishes around the world. I think that's the unknown and what that does to the economy that puts the cloud over us. If without those things, I think your statement would be spot on. Okay. All right. Thanks very much, Dan. Thanks, Kevin. Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. The next question is from Matt Olney of Stephens. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks. Good morning, everybody. Good morning, Matt. Most of my questions have been addressed, but I wanted to ask about deposit growth. It looked good in the quarter, but you mentioned there were some seasonal tailwinds that you guys benefited from. Can you quantify this? Just trying to appreciate if we saw any true sticky deposit growth in 1Q and then kinda the outlook for deposit growth from here. Thanks. Yeah. 1 Q has historically been the best deposit growth quarter for both of our companies on a standalone. We've not experienced a Q2 as a combined company together yet, this will be new for us. Q2 has also been the weakest quarter historically for both of us. I think the anticipation would be that with the municipal deposits that we were both carrying coming into the merger, that we would see similar to what we had seen in the past as standalone entities. When you look back, I think both of us had seen, you know, flat to down deposits in 2Q for the last several years, and I would think that all things being equal, I don't know why it wouldn't be the same this year. Got it. Okay. That's helpful. On the mortgage front, it looked like the percent of production sold was down this quarter around 50%. It had been that 70%-80% range over the last few years. Is this a timing issue or just structural, you guys choosing to sell less to production and to balance sheet more of that? Thanks. Yeah, nothing has changed from a structure standpoint. There's timing and there's product. You know, if there's a product mix, we have been retaining the arms on the balance sheet. If we're putting more arms or producing more arms, those would stay. There's been no change in our process. Chris, you wanna add in there? Yeah, no change. There's probably some noise from the combination of the company that just hasn't shook out yet as well because both sides were doing mortgages, portfolio mortgages and, you know, we were doing a lot more volume, relatively speaking on the secondary market side. I think it just takes some time for that to sort of balance itself and see some trends that make sense. Remember, we finished the merger or the consolidation of all of our origination on the one platform in the Q1. There's certainly some- Right. Timing issues and work going on there. Yep. Okay. Okay. Thanks, guys. Thank you, Matt. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks. All right. Thank you all. In closing, I believe our results speak for themselves in terms of the early successes of the combination of our two companies. The fact that we've continued to report meaningful balance sheet growth so soon after the legal merger closing is a tremendous testament to the efforts of our collective group of bankers, as well as the cohesiveness of our back office and the credit support functions. Aside from industry-wide headwinds on mortgage, our fee income businesses continue to grow at impressive rates. As we look forward, we've challenged our frontline teammates to build on this momentum while our back office and support personnel continue their efforts working towards a successful completion of our integration efforts later this fall. It truly is an exciting time for the new Cadence Bank. Thank you all again for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you all again soon. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.