Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Isoray Fiscal Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Call for the quarter ended December 31, 2021. At this time, all participants have been placed on a listen only mode, and we will open the floor for your questions and comments after the presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host, Mark Levin. Sir, the floor is yours. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today for the Isoray Fiscal Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Call for the quarter ended December 31, 2021. Before we get started, I will take a few minutes to read the forward-looking statement. Certain statements in this conference call constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 as amended. When used in this conference call, words such as will, believe, expect, anticipate, encourage, and similar expressions as they relate to the company or its management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the company's management, identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs about future events as of today, February 8, 2022. As with any projection or forecast, they are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. The company undertakes no obligation to and expressly disclaims any obligation to update or alter its forward-looking statement, whether resulting from such changes, new information, subsequent events, or otherwise. Additional information concerning forward-looking statement is contained under the headings of Safe Harbor Statement and Risk Factors listed from time to time in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We will begin today's call with Lori Woods, Isoray's Chief Executive Officer, and then Jonathan Hunt, Isoray's Chief Financial Officer, who will discuss the fiscal second quarter 2022 financial results. Following their prepared remarks, we will take questions from our analysts and institutional investors. I will now turn the call over to Lori Woods. Thank you, Mark. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today for Isoray's Fiscal Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call for the quarter ended December 31, 2021. Following my prepared remarks, our Chief Financial Officer, Jonathan Hunt, will provide a more detailed review of our fiscal second quarter financial results. I am pleased to share with you the continued growth we experienced in our fiscal second quarter. Total revenue for the fiscal second quarter increased 19% versus the year ago quarter to $2.82 million. This represented the third straight quarter of year-over-year growth for our core prostate business, as well as total company revenue. I believe there are encouraging trends in our business. In fact, this quarter is the second highest revenue quarter in the company's history, right behind the quarter ended March 31, 2020, at the very beginning of COVID. The second quarter marked a return to a more normal pace of business for us. Access to clinicians and hospitals increased as COVID seemed to settle down and patients increasingly worked through the referral process. I remain confident that the steps we are taking will benefit us even more as our end markets rebound further from the impact we have been experiencing due to the pandemic. In addition to growth in our core prostate business, our non-prostate brachytherapy business, which is about 25% of our total revenues now, grew 46% year-over-year. This was largely driven by continued expansions of treatments for brain cancer, notably GammaTile Therapy. We're happy to report that GT Medical Technologies continues to make progress in increasing awareness of the value of GammaTile to both patients and clinicians. We look forward to sharing more information with you regarding their ongoing clinical trials and the benefit of this therapy later this year. The growth we've been experiencing over the past few quarters in our prostate business reinforces our confidence in this market opportunity. This is especially true when we look at this growth in context of the ongoing pandemic. I believe the pandemic-related headwinds to our prostate business will persist, but with diminishing magnitude moving forward. Ultimately, I believe that what we have been saying repeatedly over the last two years remains accurate. Cancer does not stop due to the pandemic. Consequently, we believe the number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer is going to grow at a historically high rate. Data such as that highlighted in the American Cancer Society's 2022 Cancer Facts and Figures report that was published in January support this position. This report estimates that nearly 270,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer this year, which is almost 50% more than the number of men diagnosed annually in the years just prior to the pandemic. This also reflects a higher number than the estimated 250,000 diagnoses published in the 2021 report. Despite these historic challenges driven by the pandemic, we continue to believe Isoray is well-positioned to accelerate our growth and expand our share of the prostate brachytherapy market. Certainly, the compelling long-term data we have continued to accumulate over the past few years speaks to Cesium's efficacy. This combination of increasing clinical evidence of Cesium-131 as a powerful option for the treatment of prostate cancer and the likely growing market opportunity points to now as the time to accelerate our sales and marketing efforts. With that in mind, we recently engaged in a thorough review of the prostate market opportunity and how our sales and marketing strategy should be aligned. One of the facets of the review was focused on identifying the programs that were most beneficial to promoting Cesium-131 as the isotope of choice for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancers. Sales, supported by marketing, will be tasked with implementing changes to reflect what we have learned from this internal review to advance our efforts to broaden awareness with clinicians as well as patients. One component aimed at achieving broadened awareness as well as increasing market penetration is our plan to increase our head count in sales. We expect to increase the number of territory managers from seven to 10 over the next 12 months. We believe this, combined with our increasing clinical evidence, will accelerate new clinician adoption of Cesium-131 in our core prostate market. It is our expectation that it will also increase the utilization of complementary value-added products, such as the C4 Sirius MRI markers. We will also be dedicating more marketing resources to both clinicians and patients. Our market research has reinforced the notion that although radiation oncologists and neurologists generally are receptive to the clinical data on Cesium-131, their awareness of the product is relatively low, and they are more likely to use the isotope they were originally trained on. To that end, we are going to have more frequent company-sponsored trainings. Important to our training plans is the implementation of Proximie as a virtual tool for those clinicians and their teams that don't have the time or the desire to travel. Additionally, we are receiving renewed interest in in-person training once again, which we have reinstated for those who are ready to return to that training setting. Another aspect of this effort is tied to our work with the Cesium Advisory Group, or CAG, to update the guidelines on how to successfully implant the prostate using Cesium-131. This group is comprised of experienced clinicians who are eager to share best practices in planning and executing Cesium-131 prostate implant procedures. We will then add this information to our company-sponsored clinician training programs. We believe the CAG recommendations will empower clinicians to use our isotope by following the guidelines and encourage those who have not used this isotope previously. We believe this will accelerate adoption of Cesium-131 in new centers. This emphasis on clinician engagement and training extends to our plans to deepen our engagement with ABS, the American Brachytherapy Society. Most recently, we have seen a change that is of great interest. ABS and Grand Rounds in Urology are collaborating. Grand Rounds in Urology is a leading network of clinicians who provide best practices and current clinical updates for the treatment of urologic disease and conditions, including prostate cancer. They are building on their strengths to bring expanded programs and training opportunities on brachytherapy to radiation oncologists, urologists, and physicists. We are looking forward to attending an event in early March where these clinicians will be on hand, as well as a number of ABS senior executives. The program is an outgrowth of the International Prostate Cancer Update, or IPCU, one of Grand Rounds in Urology's program offerings. It includes a multi-day CME-accredited conference focused on prostate cancer treatment updates. Isoray will be exhibiting at this conference, and I, along with several senior Isoray executives, will be there to assure a strong brand presence and take full advantage of some key networking opportunities. We continue to make progress towards a launch of the C4 Sirius MRI markers in combination with our cesium-131 seeds for treating prostate cancer. We believe that in the immediate future, the incorporation of MRI will offer a significant improvement in the planning, execution, and evaluation of prostate brachytherapy. The benefit from the integration of MRI extends to both patients and clinicians in offering higher quality implants than possible with currently available imaging technologies. The FDA-cleared prostate treatment we developed in partnership with C4 Imaging brings together MRI-assisted radiotherapy with Cesium-131. This represents a step forward as it advances imaging technologies that have been in place for over 30 years with little or no innovation during that time. At the end of February, we will be conducting an internal launch preparation meeting regarding this new prostate treatment opportunity, which will train our sales teams so they will be better able to engage with key institutions and providers. To promote greater awareness among patients, we will be growing our direct-to-consumer advertising and marketing programs. Increasingly, patients have more influence on treatment decisions in many healthcare settings. We believe this is also very true for the prostate cancer market. It is our sense that the value proposition of Cesium for the treatment of prostate cancer is compelling and easy to understand. As a result, we feel it should be well-received by many of the growing number of men facing prostate cancer. Patient engagement is also behind our intent to increase our presence with the key advocacy group, ZERO Prostate Cancer. Given their established position as a leading patient advocacy group, we believe it will contribute to our drive to further recognition of cesium amongst patients. Underpinning all of these programs will be our continued concentration on refining Cesium Blu's brand image and related messaging across our website, collateral, and outreach to patients. I am equally excited about the growing opportunities for our proprietary isotope in treatment areas like brain, head and neck, and lung. In fact, we are currently awaiting a response from CMS on a reimbursement code for high-activity seeds that support our surgical applications. This is important because there are certain types of lung cancers that may benefit from a high level of activity. For example, seeds with a higher isotope activity may be more effective for non-surgical treatment of certain lung cancers. Finally, I am happy to report that our immuno-oncology study combining Cesium-131 with Keytruda for the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers continues to gain momentum with recent additional patient enrollment as we move beyond COVID-related hospital restrictions that have been a headwind to the study thus far. Additionally, we continue to have ongoing discussions with other leading institutions interested in potentially collaborating with the University of Cincinnati to potentially make this a multi-center study. We are hopeful that enrollment will continue to accelerate and that we will have enrollment completed in the coming months. I do want to share with you that we have made significant inroads towards these phase I and phase II clinical trials. We will keep you updated as progress is made. Our clinical trial strategy is ongoing and will continue to represent a significant portion of the R&D expenditures going forward. In closing, we are increasing our activities on a number of fronts. We believe that our multi-pronged undertakings aimed at our core prostate business surrounding training, sales, and marketing at this time when we expect the overall market to expand is essential. We feel it will support Isoray returning to the growth rate our prostate business was experiencing prior to the pandemic. At the same time, we see strong progress in the developing opportunities to treat applications for brain, head and neck, lung, and other cancers. Lastly, we continue to make progress with respect to a number of strategic collaborations and investments, which we will share with you once we have more details, barring any unforeseen circumstances. I am encouraged by the recent growth and future opportunities for Isoray. Now I will turn the call over to Jonathan to review the results of our fiscal second quarter in more detail. Thank you, Lori. I am going to discuss some of the financial information that was contained in our press release for the fiscal second quarter ended December 31, 2021 that we released a short while ago. We anticipate that our Form 10-Q will be filed with the SEC on or before February 14. Revenue for the second quarter ended December 31, 2021 grew 19% to $2.82 million versus $2.36 million for the same period last year. Prostate brachytherapy revenue increased 13% versus the second quarter of fiscal 2021. Second quarter revenue was comprised of 76% for prostate brachytherapy, with the balance for 24% of revenue attributed to other brachytherapy. Driven primarily by seed and services revenue from GT Medical Technologies, other brachytherapy revenue increased 46% versus the second quarter of fiscal 2021. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the second quarter ended December 31, 2021 was 43.3%, compared to 49.5% for the quarter ended December 31, 2020. The gross margin decline was primarily the result of the 34% increase in cost of product sales when compared to the year-ago quarter. The primary driver was ordering of additional isotope during the initial setup phase of an additional reactor coming online to support future growth of the company. Additionally, payroll and benefits expenses increased as a result of greater headcount versus the comparable year ago period. Second quarter gross profit dollars of $1.2 million increased 5% when compared to the same period last year. Total operating expenses, consisting of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative, increased 40% to $2.86 million versus $2.04 million in the second quarter of 2021. Total R&D expenses increased 88% versus the comparable prior year quarter to $535,000. The increase in total research and development expenses was primarily a result of increased payroll and benefits spent due to greater headcount versus the prior year comparable period and higher market research expenses versus the prior year comparable period. Sales and marketing expenses increased 13% versus the comparable prior year quarter to $702,000. The increase in sales and marketing expenses was driven primarily by increases in travel and trade show costs and increases in payroll and benefits expense due to merit increases, new hires, and increased incentive compensation versus the prior year comparable period. G&A expenses of $1.62 million represented an increase of 43% versus the fiscal second quarter of 2021. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to increases in payroll and benefits spent due to annual merit increases and greater headcount, employment hiring expenses, IT consulting expenses, D&O insurance premiums, public company expenses, audit and legal fees, and travel expenses versus the prior year comparable period. The second quarter net loss was $1.6 million versus a net loss of $868,000 during the same prior year period. The net loss per basic and diluted share was $0.01 versus the net loss of $0.01 for the prior year fiscal second quarter. Basic and diluted share results are based on weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 142 million at fiscal second quarter 2022 versus approximately 83 million for the prior year period. As of December 31, 2021, the company had cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit that totaled $60.4 million or approximately $0.42 per share, compared to $63.8 million at the end of the fiscal year 2021, ended June 30, 2021. The company has $0 long-term debt. Shareholders' equity at the end of the fiscal second quarter 2022 totaled $64.4 million versus $67.4 million at the end of fiscal year 2021. I will now turn the call over to the operator to take questions from our analysts and institutional investors. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the floor is now open for questions. If you have any questions or comments, please indicate so now by pressing star one on your touch-tone phone. Pressing star two will remove you from the queue should your question be answered. And lastly, while posing your question, please pick up your handset if listening on speakerphone to provide optimum sound quality. Please hold while we poll for questions. Once again, that's star one if you have a question or comment. The first question is coming from Frank Takkinen from Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is live. Hey, Lori, Jonathan. Thanks for taking my questions for me today. I wanted to start with the commentary around internal investment. It sounds like a relatively significant step up in the internal investment side, sales, marketing, DTC, those types of things. My first part question is, one, what is triggering this? Is it improving clarity into the end market? Is it something else? Then two, is there anything to read into what feels like to me an increased focus on internal investment rather than what felt like a focus on external investment in previous conference calls? Hi, good afternoon, Frank. Let me start by talking about our investment in sales and marketing. We're really starting to feel like we're seeing access to hospitals improve and some of the COVID restrictions starting to come down. Where for the last couple years, we've had the ups and downs of that happening, we do believe and we are certainly hoping that going forward we'll have better access and things will ease a bit. Now is a very good time for us to focus on the breakout in our territories and the access that our sales team has to get in front of customers on a regular basis. We feel like there are territories within which we could do a better job than that, and therefore, we're looking at this time at adding additional sales people in those different territories to be able to increase the access to these hospitals that are opening up. We're excited about that. When it comes to increased folks in other areas, certainly over the last few earnings calls, we've been talking about our shoring up internal resources to support additional growth. What you're seeing here is definitely looking at our R&D resources and other resources as well to make sure that we can continue to focus on some of these external things. We certainly haven't lost focus on these external things. We continue to look at opportunities and refine our opportunities, and then once it gets to the due diligence phase, work on our due diligence. That does take resources to do all that. Okay, that's helpful. I wanted to ask one on seasonality. Obviously, it's a little bit less clear with the different COVID impact that have been occurring, but can you provide any thoughts around seasonality of the December-ended quarter versus what might impact the March-ended quarter? It's interesting. If it was a non-COVID year, I would say that typically our seasonality can be found during the summertime when people go on vacation and around the holidays as well. What we saw more this year than past years was the impact of COVID on the season, so to speak. When COVID went up, we have been seeing the reduction in access to hospitals and patients getting in the system, and it hasn't necessarily lined up with the holidays or vacation times this year. As we look into this first quarter here, my hope is that Omicron really does go down as people say it may, and fall off quickly and we get back more into that summer environment that we've seen with COVID the last couple years. As we look forward, that's what we're hoping to see, but we just don't know if another variant's gonna pop up and put us back in the same position where we were in with Delta, where we thought we were moving forward and then Omicron hit. We continue to watch it. We continue to work at ways to engage with hospitals and clinicians around all of this going on. Okay, last one for me. Realizing you're in the process of adding another reactor at a time where supply chain increasing material costs have been very common out there, can you kind of peel apart the impact of those two? Honestly, I thought the gross margin was a little bit better than anticipated for the quarter. Maybe just talk about the different material cost increase as well as the reactor impact and when we could see something back towards your about 50%+ gross margin experienced in previous years. Yeah, Frank, we did experience some additional costs due to starting up the additional reactor. We felt that was very beneficial for us given where we're at kind of in the marketplace, and particularly as we look forward and anticipate additional growth. We expect to be able to balance those two reactors out over the coming quarter. Especially, you know, margin's gonna really start to improve and get back into those kind of that 50% range as we see the sales continue to improve. Really when the sales start to improve, that's when it allows us to be more efficient with our use of isotope, which is one of the main cost drivers. You know, in terms of other supplies, we have seen some increases there, but we have not had any supply chain disruptions. We've been able to maintain our supply chains, sometimes going out to other vendors at times, but nonetheless, being able to acquire the supplies that we need throughout this time. Perfect. Thanks for taking my question. The next question is coming from Mike Ott from Oppenheimer. Mike, your line is live. Good afternoon, Lori and Jonathan. Thanks for taking my question. You know, really nice 13% year-over-year growth in core prostate last quarter, you know, now back above December 2019 levels. I mean, is it a fair synopsis this is just a bit of, you know, post Delta, pre Omicron recovery coupled with, you know, Lori, the better access that you mentioned and possibly some of the ABS guideline inclusion that I believe was effective September 2021? Yeah, I think it's fair to categorize certainly that we had a quarter where we had better access, and we felt like we were getting in front of physicians. Physicians were seeing these patients come in and through the system, and that certainly helped. We have also been working, as we talked about, getting our training programs up and going again, getting clinicians involved in understanding how to do a great cesium implant so they feel really comfortable, and I think all those things are helping to support, the growth that you're seeing. Okay, that's great to hear. Pivoting over to, you know, the other non-prostate side, you know, it seems like we've observed an increase in customers maybe trying GammaTile or at least an increase in talking about it. You know, realizing that GT is a separate company, are you aware of any, you know, increased marketing efforts on their behalf? Related to that, has the new arrangement, I believe, where you're providing GT with the seeds as opposed to the finished tile, has that, played any role? It just seems in our model, you know, obviously there's some really big growth numbers that we saw in your fiscal 2021 that, you know, we're just seeing it slow to some more, you know, still respectable numbers on the non-prostate. Yeah, absolutely. No, we're excited about what GammaTile is doing, and I think they're working as hard as we are toward getting access to clinicians and broadening the numbers of clinicians and institutions that are aware of GammaTile. I think we, in terms of what we see from our perspective, feel like they're making good progress on this front, and we're very excited to be able to support them. When it comes to us selling them seeds and them loading their own tiles, that I think has been very beneficial for both companies. We are excited to be helpful and support them in any way that we possibly can and feel like that's going really well. That's great. One last topic, you know, realizing that brachytherapy is no longer part of it, curious, Lori, if you have any thoughts on the latest one-year delay to the RO-APM to now not before, I believe, January of 2023? Yeah, absolutely. You know, we continue to see this get pushed back a bit. I have to give a lot of credit to ASTRO because I think they've been working really hard with CMS to get CMS to understand the kinds of issues that are related to the complexity of providing radiation treatment to patients. I think this year, pushback is gonna give us the opportunity to look at some of the things that could be better in that language to help make sure that patients have access to the care that they need. From that perspective, although we continue to be hopeful that they will engage in the RO-APM model at some point now that seeds have been removed from it doesn't impact us as directly. Yet patients who have high-risk prostate cancers are likely to get external beam radiation and brachytherapy. That's been shown in the data to be the best way to treat advanced cancers. You know, we have a vested interest in wanting to make sure that patients have access. I'm excited about what ASTRO is looking at to work with CMS to fix some of the last remaining issues. Great. That does it for me. Thanks so much. Thank you, Mike. Once again, if there are any remaining questions or comments, please indicate so by pressing star one. The next question is coming from Tim Chiang from Northland Securities. Your line is live. Hi. Thanks, Lori. Lori, you mentioned that you're making some progress on the enrollment for the, I think it's the Cesium-131 Keytruda study. Do you have any idea when that study will fully enroll? Is there any sort of timetable for that? Typically, Tim, I would be able to give you a better sense of that. Unfortunately, COVID has been problematic for enrolling some of these studies. What we're trying to do to really speed up enrollment is turn this into a multi-center study. We have a couple other institutions who aren't through the process of complete enrollment yet. Hopefully when they are, I can talk to everyone about them. They're very interested in joining this, and that would make it a lot easier to finish off the enrollment of this particular study. The more access we have to patients and giving them this opportunity for this type of treatment, the faster that will go. Okay. I think on the call you said that you're gonna hire three more sales reps. Is that right? Yes. Over the next 12 months, we're looking at dividing out three additional territories across the country. Any thought in terms of how much additional revenue you might be able to generate from adding new territories this year? I mean, I would imagine it's probably pretty sensitive as to each additional territory you add. You know, I would imagine that should help you, right? Yeah, it sure should. It really depends on where we make the finalized cuts for breaking up the territories. It's difficult for me to give you a number at this point in time, but we absolutely do feel like if our salespeople can get in front of more people more frequently, we can move the process forward faster, and that should result in these additional territories being helpful over time. Remember, it's a process for us. We have to get the radioactive materials licenses for many centers amended. What we're finding is during COVID, that takes a little longer than it did before. Where we can get to centers that already have Cesium on the license, we're taking advantage of that and then working with these other centers to get them through the process as fast as we can. More feet on the ground, more people able to support that will only improve, you know, our ability to get that done. I mean, is there any thought where you might put some investment dollars behind, training and involving some of the medical schools in the U.S. so that, you know, residents get more education on brachytherapy? You know, that's a really good question, Tim, and something that we have been evaluating, and I don't have specific institutions for you at this point in time, but certainly it behooves us to be in teaching institutions where these clinicians are being trained so that they're comfortable with cesium when they come out of these institutions. Some of the ways we're doing that right now without actually being involved with the specific institution is when we work with folks like the American Brachytherapy Society, residents and other people go to these programs to learn more about what's happening in brachytherapy, and that gives us the opportunity to get in front of them and to talk to them about this unique treatment that we have and all the benefits to it. What we do is we then move them through the training process. Even though they're not getting trained, say, in medical school for using specifically Cesium, we can get to them through areas like IPCU and the ABS to get them in front of our particular treatment and to get them the training they need to be very successful in using Cesium-131. We're trying to leverage some other areas. To your question, absolutely. I mean, it looks like you did pretty well in the quarter, and you know, with COVID cases starting to decline, you may have a line of sight to more radiotherapy procedures, as we approach the summer. We are certainly hoping so. Okay, great. Congrats, Lori. Thank you so much. Okay, the next question is coming from Kyle Krueger from Apollo Capital. Your line is live. Yeah, nice quarter. What assurance can you give us as to the Cesium-131 supply chain not being disrupted with the Russian, you know, drama going on? Oh, that's a very good question. We've had a really long-standing relationship with Russia and buying isotopes with them going back to the early 2000s. During that time, we've had other geopolitical kinds of things happen, like Crimea and some of the other, you know, political situations that have arisen from time to time. During that point in time, we have never missed an order or had a disruption happen. We have spoken with our friends and partners over there about the situation and about our supply. We see at this point in time, no complications to that. It seems to be business as usual, and we appreciate their going out of their way to make sure that we're comfortable with that. When I look at all the different sanctions, and we do keep an eye on that are being out there, I think the only one that I actually found a little bit humorous was the ones where they were talking about not being able to actually transfer money between banks in and out of Russia. They were looking at sanctioning, you know, the ability to do that, which would mean we would have to, you know, write a paper check and send it by, you know, a DHL or an international courier service to actually make our payment versus any bank transfers. But at this point in time, that is where we feel that this stands. There might be some inconvenience associated with that kinds of things, but that our isotope supply is not in jeopardy. Globally, Lori, is there a readily available alternative source of the same quality, same pricing? Does it make sense over time to sort of at the margin diversify your supply requirement out of that single relationship, or are you not thinking about it that way? Well, we always think about it, and we think about it that way. I'll give you a couple examples that I think in previous years we've put in our K's and our Q's. We had a U.S. supply for quite some time from the University of Missouri at the MURR reactor. The folks there are great, and they do a great job. Our problem ended up being because they're not a commercial reactor, they're a research reactor, the cost of their isotope was more than double what we could get from Russia, and we then had to have the additional expense of purifying that radioisotope once it got to our manufacturing facility. We are always looking at reactors around the world, to your earlier question, to see what opportunities are out there and to figure out are they the reactor that has the appropriate flux rate to make Cesium-131. That's one of the criteria. Another one of the criteria would be how could they get that Cesium to us, and in what state would it be when it gets to us? And then pricing is always a question we look at. We keep a list of all the reactors online, offline, coming online, going offline around the world, and we continue to investigate that on an ongoing basis. Yeah. Okay. Final question from me. With the dramatic surge in COVID late December going into January, did you see the same displacement of your procedures that you've seen in the past in that, you know, albeit short window? Did you see a change in behavior? Is the backlog out there so overwhelming that there's nothing that can slow it down? You had a dramatic acceleration in revenues, but what are you seeing in this most recent period with the surge? We do see an impact from when it surges, most certainly. What happens is hospitals start shutting down, and I always hate when we're lumped in with, you know, all the other types of surgery that they consider non-essential. They basically, the problems recently have been there are not enough staff at hospitals to staff for everything. When they start to be overrun with COVID cases, they back off on everything else. We certainly have had that impact us. I also think what we're starting to see a bit more as people have gotten vaccinated and boosted and are maybe in some cases just the fatigue of COVID, is we're starting to see that there's upticks during the downturns of COVID. I think that's what we saw last quarter, was part of the quarter was a little slow. There was some, you know, uptick going on in COVID, but the rest of the quarter wasn't. That's where we saw a significant upturn. I think it is these people who haven't been able to get into the system that are looking to get into the system knowing they need to. To some degree, be it either access, they just can't get in any other time or, you know, patients actually looking at it and timing it saying, "Now looks like a good opportunity." They've been getting into the system a little faster, it would seem. Thank you. Best of luck going forward. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, once again, if you have a question or a comment, please indicate so now by pressing star one on your touch tone phone. Okay, there are no more questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Lori Woods for closing remarks. Thank you everyone for joining us today. We really appreciate it, and we hope you have a great afternoon and evening. Bye-bye. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect your phone lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.