Good morning, and welcome to Crown Holdings' first quarter 2022 conference call. Your lines have been placed in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer session. Please be advised that this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Kevin Clothier, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Sir, you may begin. Thank you, Carrie, and good morning. With me on today's call is Tim Donahue, President and Chief Executive Officer. If you don't already have the earnings release, it is available on our website at crowncork.com. On this call, as in the earnings release, we will be making a number of forward-looking statements. Actual results could vary materially from such statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to vary is contained in the press release and in our SEC filings, including our Form 10-K for 2021 and subsequent filings. The company's recorded earnings in the quarter of $1.74 per share compared to earnings of $1.57 a share in the prior year quarter. Adjusted earnings per share increased to $2.01 in the quarter compared to $1.83 in 2021. Net sales in the quarter were up 23% from the prior year, primarily due to the pass-through of higher raw material costs and increased beverage can volumes. Segment income was $383 million in the quarter compared to $369 million in the prior year, primarily due to improved profitability in North American tin plate businesses and can-making equipment, including a net benefit of $30 million from lower cost inventory, offset by the timing of insurance recovery for the incremental cost related to the Bowling Green tornado and $8 million of unfavorable foreign exchange. We have repurchased $400 million of Crown common stock to date from the $3 billion program that the board authorized in December. While Brazil remains soft, we do expect volumes to begin to recover in Q2 and throughout the year. When combined with the stronger U.S. dollar and higher energy costs in Europe, we now project EBITDA to be $1.97 billion for the year, for the full year. Our estimate for adjusted earnings for the second quarter is in the range of $2.00-$2.10 per share, and for the full year, we remain in the guided range of $8.00-$8.20 per share. The full year estimate continues to assume all losses from Bowling Green will be recovered from the timely collection of insurance proceeds by year-end. It assumes we repurchase additional $600 million of Crown common stock in 2022 and a cumulative $1 billion for the year. We continue to expect free cash flow to be $400 million with capital spending of $1 billion, and we maintain a target leverage ratio in the range of 3.25x for 2022. With that, I will turn the call over to Tim. Thank you, Kevin, and good morning to everyone. I'll be brief, and then we'll open the call to questions. As reflected in last night's release, and as Kevin just summarized, overall first quarter performance was better than expected, although compared to the prior year, results were mixed across the operating segments. Global beverage can volumes up 1% in the quarter reflect sold-out conditions in most markets and demand for beverage cans remaining in excess of our ability to supply. The exception being Brazil, where our unit sales declined by 20% in line with the market decline of 26%. Overall, global volumes advanced by 6.5% in the quarter when excluding the Brazil market. We have summarized our major capacity expansion projects in the release with second quarter startups as follows. The second line in Monterrey, Mexico began commercial shipments earlier this month, and the first line of the new greenfield plant in Uberaba, Brazil will begin shipping to customers next month. Reported revenues increased 23% in the first quarter, primarily due to the pass-through of inflated raw material costs. Comparatively, the cost of tin plate steel is almost double the prior year, while delivered aluminum is up approximately 75% on average in the first quarter of 2022. Recent strength in the U.S. dollar impacted segment income in the first quarter by $8 million and by operating segment was as follows: Both European Beverage and Transit, $3 million each, while Asia was $2 million. In Americas Beverage, like-for-like North American unit volume growth was 6%, excluding the temporary loss of Bowling Green production capacity. Due to the temporary loss of Bowling Green, we carefully managed our capacity and inventory levels ahead of the busy summer selling season, reducing opportunities for further volume growth in the quarter. Demand remained strong in Mexico and Colombia, with unit volume growth of 4% limited by capacity. Low consumer confidence driven by high inflation and unemployment and the delay of Carnival led to significant first quarter softness in the Brazilian market. We do see volumes beginning to return early in the second quarter, and as Kevin noted, we expect further recovery as the year progresses. Segment income in the quarter reflects approximately $20 million in incremental system operating costs due to Bowling Green tornado. We do expect to begin receiving insurance recoveries during the second quarter. With both lines at Bowling Green now back in operation and continued learning curve improvements on recently installed capacity, we expect second quarter income will exceed the prior year, offsetting Bowling Green insurance timing. Unit volumes in European Beverage advanced 6% over the prior year, with notable growth across Mediterranean operations and Saudi Arabia. Moving into the second quarter, we remain sold out and look forward to incremental 2023 capacity from recently announced projects in Spain and the U.K. Income in the segment was better than forecast due to volume growth and mix. As previously discussed, we do expect significant earnings headwinds in the segment during the second quarter and for the balance of the year. Beverage can volumes in Asia Pacific advanced 8% in the first quarter, as strong shipments across Southeast Asia offset the impact of COVID restrictions in China. Adjusting for currency, segment income in Transit Packaging declined $6 million in the quarter, primarily due to higher costs, including the impact of inflation and the carryover of higher priced year-end steel balances brought into 2022. Appropriate pricing actions have been taken, and we expect second quarter income in this segment will reflect that. As noted in the release, our North American tinplate and beverage can making equipment businesses had strong results in the first quarter. In North American food, we benefited from additional two-piece food can capacity installed in 2021, leading to 16% unit volume sales growth in self-made two-piece food cans in the first quarter of 2022. Additionally, pricing actions were taken to recover 2021 inflationary cost items, including the benefit of prior year-end inventory. In summary, a solid start to the year with results mixed, but overall ahead of plan. Looking ahead to the second quarter, Bowling Green is now back up and running. Contractual recovery of inflation commenced on April first in North America. Pricing actions have been taken in transit to recover inflation, and we continue to expect global beverage can demand to remain strong. With that, Carrie, I think we are now ready to take questions. Thank you. We will now begin a question -and- answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star and then the number one. Please unmute your phone and record your name clearly when prompted. Your name is required to introduce your question along with your company name. To withdraw your request, please press star and then two. Our first question is coming from the line of Ghansham Panjabi of Baird. Your line is now open. Thank you. Good morning, everybody. I guess, you know, Tim, maybe focusing on the U.S., I mean, clearly, you know, mobility is starting to increase, you know, people moving around, flying, et cetera. On-premise sales dollars seem to be improving as well, commensurate with that in restaurants, et cetera. Can you just characterize for us if that's having any impact on packaged beverage volumes or maybe even food as it relates to, you know, how you see the rest of the year unfolding? You know, Gansham, it's a good question. You would expect what you just said to be true. We haven't seen it yet. Now, as I said on the call, on the prepared notes, we weren't very aggressive trying to sell cans in Q1. We're a little concerned with our summer inventory levels, given that we lost capacity early in the year, and we obviously won't have full capacity until we get the plant back through initial learning curve stages at Bowling Green. It does not appear that demand for beverage cans, that the momentum is slowing that much. Sounds good. In terms of the modest reduction in EBITDA for this year, maybe you could just break out the various drivers. You know, just given the timing of Carnival last year versus this year, do you have a sense as to what the impact might have been, in theory, at least for the first quarter? Maybe just quantify for us what you're seeing so far in Brazil, so far in Q2. Yeah. I think, you know, right off the bat, Ghansham, I think, you know, headwinds on the reduction of EBITDA, you know, currency, we were already forecasting currency to be a headwind this year, but it's probably an incremental $10 million where we sit today, it's probably an incremental $10 million from where we were at a couple months ago. I think just using the euro as a proxy, not all currencies move similar to the euro, but using the euro as a proxy, we're 1.07, 1.08 right now, and I'll bet you two months ago when we talked to you, or two and a half months ago when we talked to you, it was 1.11 or 1.12. Energy in Europe, think about incremental $20 million of headwinds in Europe from where we were at a couple months ago when we talked to you. Brazil, while it's offset by minority interest at the EBITDA line, Brazil may be $10 million-$15 million offset by gains that we didn't anticipate at the time we talked to you in Asia, beverage, in food and obviously some outperformance in European beverage in the first quarter. That kinda gets you to a $30 million net EBITDA reduction. Brazil Okay. Yep, Brazil. You know, it's hard to quantify the delay of Carnival. I think the market was down 26%. We were down 20%. That doesn't make me feel good that we're better than the market. We're still down 20%. However, I gotta tell you, maybe Carnival is, at best, 10 of the 26%. The balance is gonna be shaky consumer confidence in the face of high inflation and high unemployment. As we've said to you before, we've seen these conditions before in Brazil from time to time, and it does not dampen our outlook for the growth in the Brazilian market long term. We have Occasionally, we have dips in Brazil, and as we've said to you before, we always seem to recover to higher levels and that's what we fully expect. Okay, thanks so much. Thank you, Ghansham. Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Kyle White of Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I just wanted to follow up there on Ghansham's question on Brazil. I guess, given where the consumer is at and kind of the deceleration that we saw this quarter, what's giving you the confidence that you're gonna see demand recover through the balance of the year? Well, I think we've already started to see comparatively year-over-year early here in April. We're three and a half weeks into April, and we're starting to see not only comparative to last year, but in absolute terms, some positive momentum, some pull from the customers. I think obviously we'll get Carnival here shortly, and we have the World Cup later in the year, and we'll have the summer selling season as we get to the fourth quarter for Brazil as well. You know, as I said to Ghansham, and I'll say it again, we've seen this before. It's an economy that can be volatile from time to time, and the consumer that will react to the volatility in the economy as their confidence wanes or ebbs. We're pretty confident that it's going to come back. Got it. Then just transitioning to non-reportables. Are you able to parse out the drivers of earnings improvement this quarter? You know, how much was driven by the sell-through of inventory from last year? How much was underlying improvement in food cans as well as the equipment business that you own? What I would tell you is overall food can volumes for Crown were flat in the quarter. However, we sold 16% more cans than we made, which means while we were flat, that means we bought a whole bunch of cans from third parties last year that we're not buying this year, that we're able to sell. That's a significant piece of profit for us. We're not paying profit to somebody else, and we're not paying the freight to come in from Europe. As Kevin noted, we had about a net $30 million inventory gain. That's a significant, you know, that's about half of the growth, I think, in the quarter, and the other half, think about being two-thirds food cans and a third equipment. Got it. That's very helpful. I'll turn it over. Thank you. Thank you. Next in queue is George Staphos from Bank of America. Your line is now open. Thanks very much. Hi, guys. Good morning. Thanks for the details. Just point of clarification there, Tim, on Kyle's question. You said you sold 16% more food cans than you made. That was only two-piece, right? Can you give us kind of a rough breakdown of three-piece versus two-piece for the Crown network as it stands currently? My first question or second question, I guess, is, in terms of transit, I think you said something in your release about there was inflation as you'd expected. I remember from fourth quarter, you were expecting significant, you're expecting transit to be a contributor to profit growth this year. Can you give us a bit more guidance in terms of what you're expecting this year and whether your outlook for the segment has changed at all, versus where you were in February? Yeah, I was gonna give you a number. I hate to give you a number. It's just. We'll take numbers, Tim. Yeah, I know you will. It's just like, I'll take half of your salary too, George. Come on now. Half of nothing is nothing, Tim, so. There you go. I think if we think about transit for the full year, I think we're probably considering currencies a headwind, and we sold a fairly profitable business that after those two items, we're probably still going to be up on the order of $15 million for the full year. Okay. Which would tell you that in the next three quarters, we're gonna be up about $20 million-$25 million, net of the loss of the Kiwi business and a little bit of currency headwind. Understood. One more question on three-piece cans. Yeah, three-piece versus two-piece in terms of where you sit and you said. Go ahead. We don't buy any three-piece can. Everybody in the market, as you know, George, has excess three-piece can capacity. We are principally a two-piece can maker. We're probably at Crown 60% to 2/3 two-piece, with about a third of our business being in three-piece. Just looking at the first quarter, three-piece cans were up a few percent, 3% in the quarter. The big growth that we had was in two-piece cans which were largely flat, but sleek cans were up tremendously. That's great. That's very helpful. Tim, my last one, just broadly on America's beverage can volume, is there anything that you're seeing in the market related to North America that is dampening your growth outlook? Or, you know, if you could talk as to why you might feel comfortable or reaffirmed in your growth outlook relative to new products. Within Brazil, you know, there's been a lot of questions already from Ghansham and Kyle on, you know, Brazil, which is obviously a concern right now from you. You know, one of your peer rigid packaging companies today was talking about the fact that they're sold out in a different substrate. Do you worry at all about cans, you know, losing share to glass because of the macro conditions, because of what you typically see from one-way to returnable packaging when you have macro downturns? Thanks, and good luck in the quarter. Thank you, George. I think in the short term, you will see potentially a shift in the large 600 ml glass bottle to the 600 ml glass bottle. Okay ... as consumers have less buying power, and they look to share a beer among two or three people as opposed to having their own single serve in a can. Now, having said that, you know, these are short-term data points. This is a three- to six-month headwind in the economy. I think the outlook for the overall Brazilian economy and the outlook for Brazil as a global economy is quite bright over the next 10-15 years. We remained, you know, we continue to remain very bullish on Brazil. I think if you look at anything in the short term, you can become concerned. We're not exceptionally concerned in the short term because we've seen it before, and we're very confident that it's going to turn, and the can continues to be the increasingly preferred package in Brazil. North America? Oh, North America. I, you know, as I said to Ghansham, I haven't, you know, I gotta say we weren't very aggressive in selling in the first quarter, as I said. Having said that, we've got our own customers and our other customers or smaller potential customers continue to ask for cans at rates that are much higher than we've ever seen. I, you know, you would expect perhaps with everything that's reopening, as Ghansham noted, that perhaps we'd see a little, you know, a little dampening of demand, but it hasn't happened. I think that, you know, I said it last time on the earnings call, I think the prospect of eating out at restaurants, you know, is not a very compelling prospect right now. I don't mean to take a shot at some of those restaurants, but it's really expensive. The service is lousy. The food isn't that good. If you decide you wanna prepare a meal at home, and I think the kitchen is being used a lot more nowadays than it was used pre-pandemic, and it will continue to be used pre-pandemic, the can for purposes of food and/or beverages is going to continue to be strong. I think we're in a period where we felt really good from a sustainability standpoint as relates to can a couple of years ago, and I think post-pandemic, we're seeing the can, or the can usage being re-energized, by consumers in their own kitchens. Okay. Thank you, Tim. Thanks, George. Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Phil Ng of Jefferies. Your line is now open. Hey, guys. Good morning. Tim, I guess Russia, you know, clearly a large export of commodities, including aluminum and energy. Any supply issues that we should be mindful of? Certainly you've called out energy, that's gonna have a bigger impact on your margins in Europe, but it sounds like a few of your peers are trying to push past energy and freight costs a little more on a real-time basis. How are your conversations going as you kinda renegotiate these contracts in Europe as we speak? Well, I think as we renegotiate contracts, we are steadfast in our determination to be fairly compensated for the goods and services that we provide. That includes energy, freight, raw materials, and the conversion of those raw materials in the can sheet, as well as any other cost, regulated, unregulated, labor, et cetera. I think in the interim, however, we do have contracts. You know, we expect our suppliers and customers to adhere to their contracts, and likewise, they expect us to adhere to ours. Having said that, we have not seen any disruption in the supply of raw materials and/or energy to our global sites, including the sites in Europe. Got it. That's helpful. My question on Signode. Helpful to get good color that, you know, the contracts will reset from an inflation standpoint in 2Q. Can you remind us how those contracts work? Is it largely, the bulk of your business have contractual pass-throughs, so the lag is more of a one-quarter hiccup there? When you think about this business in the medium longer term, certainly it tends to be a little more cyclical. How is your outlook on that business? It seems like you're still expecting pretty strong results. I'm curious, anything you've done since owning it to kinda, you know, moderate that cyclicality going forward. Thanks a lot. Thank you. First question. Oh, those are the contracts, I'm sorry, on Signode. For the most part, you know, the larger customers have contracts, and they will have escalator clauses. That probably makes up a small proportion, let's say 20% of the overall Signode business. The rest of the business is priced monthly or by order based on where commodities will be, whether it's the hot-rolled coil index, you know, where paper or where resin is from time to time. We do have the ability to price more rapidly in that business than we do in the can business. Since owning the business, even before we owned it, the prior owner, we both have taken significant steps to move the business away from being principally a supplier to the metals industry, with much greater supply to food and beverage and other consumer products. Having said that, if 10-15 years ago they were selling 30%-35% into the metals industry, maybe they're only selling 20% into the metals industry. Food and beverage, if it was 8% back then, it might be 20% now. I think, you know, nobody wants to talk about the R word. I do think the backlogs, not only for equipment and tools and services in Signode, but also in our can-making businesses. I think the backlog is so large that even if things do slow a little bit, it'll take a little while for the backlog to clear such that we don't see any disruption to the forecast I provided to George earlier for this year. Okay. Thanks a lot. Thank you. Next one in queue is, Mr. Mike Leithead of Barclays. Your line is now open. Great. Thanks. Good morning, guys. Hey, Mike. Good morning. First, congrats on the Transit Packaging divestment. Really nice transaction multiple there. Are there other column singles or doubles like that within the portfolio? Or I guess just how do you think about your overall portfolio as it stands today? I think, you know, that one was an easy one. It's software. We're not in the software business. Obviously, looking at the multiple, I wish I was in the software business. It's a small business. It's self-contained. It was fairly easy to do. The reason it took a couple of years to get it done is we're trying to find the right partner for that business who's gonna continue to grow the business and service the customers in the corrugated industry, because many of those customers are the customers for Signode, for equipment and also the commodities. There are numerous businesses under the Transit umbrella. I would say to you that the focus is on improving the portfolio of businesses that Crown operates, whether that be in Transit or in metal. I think it would be probably inappropriate for me to say anything other than that, but we're always trying to improve the portfolio of businesses we operate. Great. Appreciate it, Tim. Second, if we could just go back to European Beverage, it sounds like the market is quite strong. You're sold out. I appreciate energy's gone almost hyperbolic there. But does the market demand give you any sort of leverage for faster price recovery or contract structuring? I guess, just how should we expect the cadence of recovery there? I think what we said, whether we said it in October or February, is that it would take us a couple of years to get it back, and we get about 1/3 of it next year, and we get the balance of it in 2024. You know, if we had excess capacity, you could price those cans at spot or let's call it M today's market. We don't have any excess capacity, so we are selling within the constraints of our contracts that exist right now. Got it. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Gabe Hajde of Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is now open. Morning, Tim, Kevin. Morning, Gabe. Morning, Gabe. I had a question, not to focus too much on the near term, but I think there was some commentary about normalization of bev can volumes in the U.K., and I sort of trying to marry that up. I mean, I know it's common practice for you to have a large portion of business under contract before committing capital. So just curious kinda what you're seeing in underlying demand in that country and then sort of confidence interval in future demand trajectory there. I guess relatedly, if I missed it, I apologize, but you said profitability in Europe was a little bit better. What was driving that? Was that better volume or production levels, or is there something else that happened? Q1, better volumes than we had forecast, principally in Saudi Arabia and Jordan. The U.K. is the largest can market in Europe. It continues to migrate away from other substrates to the can. There's a lot of capacity that's gone into the U.K., and the market remains sold out, and demand for cans exceeds not only the existing capacity but the announced capacity. I think we're, you know, we remain very bullish on the U.K. can market is all I really wanna say at this point. Okay. Thank you. Again, I apologize if I missed it. Did you quantify the sort of the earnings impact from the steel volatility that we saw in Q4 and then into Q1 for the Transit Packaging business? I guess conceptually, the way I think about it is, to the extent those products are protecting high value items on the road or in transit, I would suspect that you're able to get price efficiently. I mean, I know you've said that, but is there opportunity for margin expansion, or are you just ensuring that you're getting back inflation? I think Kevin described net $30 million inventory. Think about inside of transit, we probably had a headwind of $3 million-$5 million. That add that to the 30, and that gives you what we had on the tin plate side. About a $4 million-$5 million headwind in transit. You've got two things. Obviously, we're trying to make sure we recover inflation. We're also trying to obviously grow the business and grow earnings, so you're always trying to do a little better. To answer your question, yeah, we're trying to expand margins. Now, that's absolute margins. I think in an environment where the raw material costs, i.e. The pass-through is significantly higher year-on-year. You do appreciate that because of the denominator effect of doubling tin plate and 75% higher aluminum, percentage margins are likely to be lower in that environment. Then vice versa, when the commodities come down, percentage margins go up. Thank you. Good luck. Thank you. The next one is coming from the line of Anthony Pettinari of Citi. Your line is now open. Hi, this is actually Bryan Bu rgmeier sitting in for Anthony. You've announced two new capacity adds in Europe in the last month or so. Is that an indication that your contract renewal talks in Europe are going well and you expect to see more raw material pass-throughs moving forward, or are those kind of unrelated to one another? Well, I think they're always related. I think it's a reflection of the demand that we see in the market from existing customers who are willing to enter into volume commitments and also new customers. But it's underpinned by the notion that we're not gonna add capacity unless we're fairly compensated for products. The answer is, it is connected, but you wouldn't build it if you didn't have more volume. Got it. Yeah. Makes sense. Yeah, last question for me. In the U.S. and in Europe, are you seeing any signs of consumers trading down to lower priced beverage products? And if you are not seeing that already, is it possible to say how a, you know, a trade down dynamic towards, you know, lower priced beer or lower priced soft drinks would impact Crown given your beverage portfolio? We are seeing store brands and the demand for cans from those who fill store brands, and other labels that are not national labels, expand exponentially right now. Obviously limited by our capacity and the Bowling Green temporary shutdown, but what you describe is happening. I'm certain it's also happening in food, but I can't, off the top of my head, point to it. I can absolutely point to it in beverage cans. We do have a very strong private label beverage can business, and we're very strong with some of the regional marketers of beverage products. I think that we do well in that environment, yes. Got it. Thanks a lot, and good luck in the quarter. Thank you. Next one in queue is Arun Viswanathan of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Thanks for taking my question. Sorry about that. I just had a question about the ready to drink market. That's one of the few markets we're actually seeing growth. Do you expect, you know, the negative comps and the scanner data to continue for non-ready to drink cocktail markets? I guess ready to drink continue to show kind of mid-single to high single digits? How does that square with what you guys are seeing within your own system? Is it just you're seeing the growth because of the capacity that you have in place? Thanks. I think we've talked about ready to drink for you know a little over a year, maybe a couple years. It is picking up some momentum, some of the momentum offsetting the slowdown in growth of spiked seltzers. Although spiked seltzers, while the growth has slowed, are still an incredibly important part of the beverage can market. It's 10%-12% or maybe even a little bit more of the beverage can market. So many of these drinks are in sleek cans. Obviously, all of the capacity we've announced has sleek capabilities. One of the reasons for expanding the industrial footprint is to grow the business, in line with volume demand, but also grow the business for the types of products and the size or shape of the can that the marketers and the consumers prefer. Yes. Okay, thanks. As a follow-up, I'm curious about the CSD market in a similar way. That's a market that was relatively weak for many years, showing kind of -1% or -2%, and seems to have turned around. Do you expect that positive growth in CSD to continue? What do we expect as far as growth rates? And maybe is it different across North America versus Europe and some of your other things? You want growth rates for CSD? Yeah. I'm just curious if you expect positive growth rates in CSD to continue, and if it's, you know, kind of across regions, what are you expecting? Yeah. I mean, I think in North America, as you point out, it did decline for a while. It seems like we're back on the uptick on CSD, so I think we do expect some growth. You know, I would tell you if you want exact numbers, you probably should be talking to your beverage analysts. But certainly, the two large marketers of CSD products have been showing fairly good growth. I think they're fairly bullish, certainly in North America. With respect to the one who's a bit more global than the other, they've been showing tremendous growth on a global basis. But I think in Europe, you know, the big growth that we're going to see in CSD is more from conversion away from glass into the can. I think, you know, the hope is that globally, we all get a bit more responsible with respect to the environment, and we start to see some PET come back to cans in several markets. You know, the only thing I would tell you is it's pretty hard for us right now in most markets to entertain that growth just given the sold-out conditions. It's gonna take us a while as an industry to get capacity to the levels where we can absorb the growth that we think will come to the can over time. Thanks. I'll turn it over. Thank you. Next question is coming from the line of Chris Parkinson of Mizuho. Your line is now open. Great. Thank you. Just very quickly, on your comment on the environment and the PET. Just given what's happening in the, you know, a few states, most notably California, a couple of airlines, and even Miami Beach have an agreement with, you know, Pepsi, you know, kind of shifting over to aluminum versus plastic. Have there been any other incremental signs that there could be actual, like, somewhat of a material shift even off of an incredibly low base? Or is that just something that continues to, you know, linger off in the distance? No, I think I don't wanna say it's lingering in the ultimate distance, as you say. I think what you point out in a couple of jurisdictions, the momentum is there. There are some jurisdictions, there are some states, at least in the United States, where it will take a little longer. But I think, let's just say in the blue states, if you will, we're gonna see a lot more momentum in that regard. I think all throughout Europe we're gonna see momentum in that regard. As I said earlier, to Arun's question, I think the limiting thing for us is our ability as an industry to get capacity and to accept in a more rapid fashion the conversion that we think from an environmental standpoint that wants to be driven from those who have greater environmental concerns. So we're you know as an industry you've seen over the last couple of years a significant number of announcements that we're all making. I think it's pretty clear that new product introductions by existing marketers or new marketers of beverage products are significantly weighted more towards the aluminum can than other substrates. So as an industry, we're trying to get there. You know, it takes time to build equipment. It takes time to procure equipment. It takes time to build a factory and train a workforce. We're doing the best we can as an industry, and we're here to help clean up the planet. Got it. Just a real quick question. You hit on RTD already. Just, you know, very quickly, could you hit on just what you're seeing in both North American and European energy drinks? Just, you know, what you've seen over the last four months as well as your outlook for the remainder of 2022 and perhaps longer? Thank you. Thank you. We do have energy drink customers. We don't have a huge energy drink business. We're looking to expand on that, but the energy drink market on both continents that you just mentioned, exploding right now. The outlook for energy is quite high. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Michael Roxland of Truist Securities. Your line is now open. Thanks. Congrats, Tim, Kevin, and Tom, on a good quarter despite all the puts and takes. Just a lot of my questions have already been asked. Just two quick ones here. You know, there's been some talk about improving supply chains. That was obviously prior to some of the recent Chinese COVID lockdowns. What have you seen just from a supply chain, material transportation, any of those constraints that were really bottlenecks? Have you seen any improvement in them recently? Let's put Shanghai port aside for a second. Shanghai is the one that's happened over the last several weeks or a month that has been something that's caught many industries off guard. We are managing our businesses effectively so far. You know, the hope is that some of that tension will ease. You know, the port might be open, but they can't get workers to the port, and then trucks from province to province or town to town in China also difficult. I think we're working through that. I think the big headwind that we've seen from a supply chain standpoint is in our equipment businesses for beverage can making equipment and some of the Signode or transit equipment, motors and circuit boards, display screens, things like that, still in short supply globally. We, like many other industries, are doing the best we can to try to procure as much of the components that we need from a select few suppliers. Let's be honest. There's a select few suppliers that meet the standards that we require and that our customers require, so we're all doing the best we can to try to do that. That still remains tight. Gotcha. Just one quick follow-up. On that last point, Tim, on the headwinds, the constraints with respect to bev can making, any impact or read-through to your own expansions? If there is, or if there are delays in terms of procuring or getting the metals and other things you need to make your, you know, to for that business, does that put at risk any of the expansions that you have planned, given longer lead times to procure that? The only thing we've had is the second line in Martinsville, Virginia, has slipped into early 2023 from we thought we'd have both lines up and running in Martinsville this year, and the second line will slip into, I think, February of 2023. That really had to do with the supply of construction steel. From time to time, we might have some bev can equipment or some transit equipment that slips 30 or 60 days from what we thought original deliveries would be. As I said, we and others are doing the best we can to try to service our customers, procure goods to service our customers. It's been tight, but we're managing. Gotcha. Good luck in the balance of the year. Thank you. We have three more questions in queue. Our next one is coming from the line of Anojja Shah of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Thank you. Morning, everyone. Morning, Anojja. Good morning. Morning. Just wanted to, we're hearing a lot about elevated glass demand. We heard this morning from a major glass producer. Given that, can we get an update on your Mexican glass business? Are you seeing a pickup in interest or business around that? We are. The answer is yes. Again, we are capacity constrained. We operate four furnaces in two factories. A significant proportion of our volume is tied under a long-term agreement with one customer. We do our best to try to push more tonnage through the furnaces, depending on the type of bottles we're making. Obviously, you make more or less depending on the bottle, but you can only push through so much tons. We're doing our best to service other customers. We have a few other customers under contract as well, and then there's non-contract spot customers, obviously, that we'd love to be able to service. As you say, demand is quite high for glass, at least as we see it in Latin America. We don't follow the other glass markets. We do follow the Latin American markets because of our exposure in Mexico, but it is quite strong. Great. Thank you for that. That new line that you just announced in Agoncillo, Spain, if I'm correct, I think you have steel lines there right now, two steel lines. Is the idea eventually to retire those steel lines, or is there enough demand for all those lines? You are correct. It was a steel beverage can facility. It's in the north of Spain towards the Bilbao region where the steel mills are. For that reason, it was set up as a steel plant many decades ago. We have beverage can end making in the plant now. We have one steel line, and we're putting in the aluminum line. Depending on the price of steel versus aluminum will depend on if and when we retire the steel line, but we would expect to add a second aluminum line in time, regardless of whether we keep the steel line or not. It'll depend on the arbitrage between steel and aluminum for those customers in Spain that may still be willing to take a steel can. Okay. Makes sense. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Angel Castillo from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Just a quick one, I guess. Could you update us on the global beverage shipments number? I think you'd given a kind of greater than 9% last year for the full year, or last quarter, excuse me. So just where do you see that coming in and, you know, kind of how do we think about Q2, whether, you know, it's you have some seasonality, but you also have some of these plants coming online and Bowling Green coming back on. So just how should we think about those shipment numbers in the cadence to that full year again? Just hold on. We're looking at something here. We initially told you, let's say 9% that we thought. We grew 9% last year. We thought we'd grow another 9% this year. Mm-hmm. I think if we were looking at it today, given the softness we saw in Brazil in Q1, I think Brazil does recover as the year goes on. You know, if we're being honest with ourselves and with you, maybe the 9% is now 8%, just given the Q1 softness in Brazil. Understood. Just wanted to switch to cash flow. You know, given all the softness, it's impressive you're still able to kind of maintain that $400 million. Curious, what are some of the puts and takes there? You know, within that, any benefit or impact from pension as we see interest rates rising? In terms of cash flow guidance, you know, clearly we reduced the EBITDA guidance to $1.97 billion from $2 billion. You have a $30 million headwind there. We're looking all over the place for, you know, ways to make that up, and the easiest way is to reduce our inventory. We had a very high inventory level coming into 2022. You know, due to all the supply chain issues, we've carried more inventory than we typically have had. That is really the main driver or the main item that'll offset the EBITDA. Understood. Any, I guess, comments on pension? The pension contributions are as we expected. The one thing on the pension, you know, we are expecting to get in, as part of the U.K. settlement, in the neighborhood of $100 million of proceeds this year, or through this year and through the first part of 2023. That's on plan. In our $400 million free cash flow guidance, that would be additive. If you look at the press release, we've actually added back the proceeds that we've gotten so far this year. Yeah. Angel, just to make sure we're clear on that, the $400 million free cash flow does not include the recovery of the illiquid pension assets from the settlement, last year's settlement of the U.K. pension plan. When we talk about pension plans on a global basis, we really have, you know, the plan in the United States and Canada. Other than that, it's very immaterial around the world for pensions. Very helpful. Thank you. Thank you. Our last question in queue is coming from the line of Adam Samuelson from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Yes, thank you. Good morning, and thanks for squeezing me in. Morning. I was wondering just on the equipment businesses in both transit and beverage can equipment, you talked about having a lot of visibility with the backlog, especially on transit through the year. Where's the book to bill in that business sitting today? I'm just trying to get a sense of kind of are we still growing backlog and kind of the visibility. I think we're at $220 million backlog. You know, I always remain concerned that if the backlog stays too big for too long, does it stay there or do potential buyers lose interest or go somewhere else? As I said, we're trying to do the best we can to procure those components we need to complete the orders and ship out the backlog. It's a business that when we acquired the business, the transit business, I think the backlog was $80 million, and now it's $220 million. Some of that is new product introductions, enhanced product introductions, the retirement of equipment that many users and customers have had for several years are looking to upgrade, all of the above. The backlog is quite high. So I guess specifically, are orders still exceeding shipments at this point, especially for the longer lead, bigger equipment? Yes. Okay. All right. Is that also true on the equipment, on the beverage can equipment side? Yes. Believe it or not, we have more orders on hand, and new orders coming in than we'll push out for specific pieces of the beverage can line this year. Yes. Okay. All right. That color is really helpful. I appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Carrie, thank you very much. I think that concludes the call today. We thank all of you for joining us, and we'll speak with you again in July. Bye now. Thank you, speakers, and that concludes today's call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.