Slides
Page 1
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 1 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE NYSE: CDE November 3, 2025 Coeur Announces Acquisition of New Gold
Page 2
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 2 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Cautionary Statements This presentation contains forward‐looking statements within the meaning of securities legislation in the United States and Canada, including statements involving the proposed transaction, including any statements regarding the expected timetable, the results, effects, and benefits of the Transaction, future opportunities for the combined company, future financial performance and condition, guidance and any other statements regarding strategic priorities and company strategies for each of Coeur and New Gold, growth, anticipated production, costs and expenses, exploration and development efforts, operations, expectations and initiatives at Las Chispas, Palmarejo, Rochester, Kensington, Wharf and Silvertip, capital allocation and estimates, liquidity sources, free cash flow, mineral reserve and resource estimates, and hedging strategies. Such forward‐looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause Coeur’s and New Gold’s respective actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward‐looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the risk that necessary approvals of Coeur’s stockholders and New Gold’s shareholders may not be obtained, that required regulatory approvals or any other condition to closing of the transaction may not be satisfied, the risk that the closing of the transaction may be delayed or not occur at all, the ultimate timing, outcome and results of integrating the operations of Coeur and New Gold, changes in governmental regulations or enforcement practices, as well as the risk that anticipated production, cost and expense levels are not attained, the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing and expanding large-scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, weather or geologically-related conditions), changes in the market prices of gold, silver and copper and a sustained lower price or higher treatment and refining charge environment, the uncertainties inherent in Coeur’s and New Gold’s respective production, exploration and development activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays, mining law changes, ground conditions, grade and recovery variability, any future labor disputes or work stoppages (involving either Coeur or New Gold and any of their respective subsidiaries or third parties), the risk of adverse outcomes in litigation, the uncertainties inherent in the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, impacts from Coeur’s and New Gold’s respective future acquisitions of new mining properties or businesses, the loss of access or insolvency of any third-party refiner or smelter to whom Coeur or New Gold markets their respective production, materials and equipment availability, inflationary pressures, continued access to financing sources, the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations and government shut-downs, the risks inherent in the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries, Coeur’s and New Gold’s respective ability to raise additional financing necessary to conduct its business, make payments or refinance its debt, as well as other uncertainties and risk factors set out in filings made from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian securities regulators, including, without limitation, Coeur’s most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and New Gold’s annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2024. Actual results, developments, and timetables could vary significantly from the estimates presented. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Coeur and New Gold each disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly such forward‐looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Additionally, Coeur and New Gold each undertake no obligation to comment on analyses, expectations, or statements made by third parties in respect of each of Coeur and New Gold, their financial or operating results or their securities. The scientific and technical information concerning Coeur’s mineral projects in this presentation have been reviewed and approved by a “qualified person” under Item 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K, namely Coeur’s Vice President, Technical Services, Christopher Pascoe. The scientific and technical information concerning New Gold’s mineral projects in this presentation have been reviewed and approved by a “qualified person” under National Instrument 43-101, being Travis Murphy, Vice President, Operations for New Gold. For a description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate mineral reserves and mineral resources included in this presentation that relate to Coeur’s mineral projects, as well as data verification procedures and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates may be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing or other relevant factors, please review the Technical Report Summaries for each of Coeur’s material properties which are available at www.sec.gov. Additional details with respect to New Gold’s New Afton and Rainy River mine projects are available in New Gold’s technical reports both dated February 10, 2025, and in New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024 , each filed on New Gold’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Coeur’s 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021 reserves and resources were determined in accordance with Item 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K. Reserves and resources for certain prior periods, including 2019, were determined in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101. Both sets of reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported, but the standards embody slightly different approaches and definitions. The ranges of potential tonnage and grade (or quality) of the exploration results described in this presentation are conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration work to estimate a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a mineral resource. The exploration results described in this presentation therefore do not represent, and should not be construed to be, an estimate of a mineral resource or mineral reserve. This presentation includes reference to certain financial measures which are not standardized measures under the parties’ respective financial reporting frameworks. These measures include operating cash flow less capital expenditures, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, free cash flow, free cash flow per share,. The parties believe that these measures, together with measures determined in accordance with GAAP or IFRS, provide investors with an improved ability to evaluate the underlying performance of Coeur and New Gold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance but do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore they may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. The data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP or IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP or non-IFRS financial performance measures are disclosed in Coeur’s MD&A accompanying its financial statements filed periodically on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. and New Gold’s MD&A accompanying its financial statements filed periodically on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. This presentation is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or public offering of the securities referred to in this presentation. No securities commission or similar authority in United States or Canada has reviewed or in any way passed upon this presentation or the merits of the securities described herein and any representation to the contrary is an offence. All references to $ are US dollar denominated unless otherwise noted.
Page 3
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 3 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Today’s Presenters Mitchell J. Krebs Coeur – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Creating a New, All North American Senior Precious Metals Producer Patrick Godin New Gold – President & Chief Executive Officer
Page 4
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 4 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE An Unrivaled All North American Mining Powerhouse Creates U.S. Precious Metals Leader Approximately $20 billion combined market capitalization company with seven high quality North American operations, sector-leading free cash flow, significantly enhanced trading liquidity and potential U.S. index inclusion Significant & Immediate Addition to EBITDA & Free Cash Flow Expected to generate approximately $3.0 billion of EBITDA and approximately $2.0 billion of free cash flow in 2026 at lower overall costs and higher overall margins Best in Class Financial Position with Growing Cash Balance Strong free cash flow expected to result in net-cash position at closing and rapidly growing cash balance, creating a clear path to an investment-grade credit rating and stockholder returns Robust Fully-Funded Growth Pipeline Strong financial position to accelerate investment in high-return organic growth opportunities at New Afton, Rainy River and across Coeur’s portfolio Highly Accretive Transaction Accretive to Coeur’s Street per share net asset value, and significantly accretive to operating cash flow, and free cash flow metrics, positioning the combined company for a potential share price re-rating
Page 5
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 5 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Portfolio Overview of Combined Company Source: FactSet, S&P Capital IQ, street research. Combined 2026E Revenue Split by Metal Split by Geography With the completion of the Rochester expansion and the recent acquisition of SilverCrest and its Las Chispas mine, adding New Gold’s two Canadian mines results in a company with seven North American operations expected to produce approximately 20 million ounces of silver, 900,000 ounces of gold and 100 million pounds of copper PALMAREJO ROCHESTER WHARF SILVERTIP KENSINGTON CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LAS CHISPAS NEW AFTON RAINY RIVER TORONTO OFFICE VANCOUVER OFFICE Coeur Operating Mine Coeur Exploration Project New Gold Operating Mine 50% 32% 18% Canada U.S. Mexico 72% 20% 8% Gold Silver Copper
Page 6
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 6 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE • Immediate and significant 16% premium to New Gold’s closing share price on October 31, 2025 • Substantial equity participation in Coeur’s well-balanced portfolio of mines in North America, while retaining meaningful exposure to future upside at New Afton and Rainy River with New Gold shareholders owning approximately 38% of the combined company • Allows New Gold shareholders to gain exposure to a combined entity with greater scale and operating diversification thereby significantly reducing risk • Uniquely positions the combined company’s robust financial strength and flexibility, along with its extensive underground mining expertise, to unlock the full potential of New Afton and Rainy River • Offers enhanced trading liquidity and capital markets exposure with a U.S. listing combined with a new Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) listing being sought by Coeur in connection with this Transaction • Potential for additional ETF ownership and eligibility for larger generalist investors • A combination with a company sharing similar culture, values and alignment on safety and caring for its workforce and local communities • Significant re-rate opportunity for the combined entity, providing additional potential value for New Gold shareholders Transaction Benefits for Shareholders • Ownership in a liquid, U.S.-based senior precious metals producer with a well-balanced platform of seven North American operations and sector-leading free cash flow yield • Enhances asset portfolio quality with addition of two large, lower-cost, higher-margin, Canadian operations which is expected to meaningfully reduce overall costs • Provides exposure to a compelling and unique metals mix consisting of gold, silver and copper • Accretive to Coeur’s per share net asset value, and significantly accretive to operating cash flow and free cash flow metrics • Further strengthens balance sheet by adding significant free cash flow to build a robust cash balance and provide enhanced flexibility • Offers significant upside potential from high-return organic growth opportunities across the combined portfolio • Increases capacity to return meaningful capital to stockholders • Bolsters the combined management team and Board with additions from New Gold ✓ ✓ Benefits to Coeur Stockholders Benefits to New Gold Shareholders ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Page 7
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 7 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Transaction Overview (1) The Transaction requires minority shareholder approval by the New Gold shareholders pursuant to MI 61-101. Transaction • Coeur to acquire all outstanding common shares of New Gold via Plan of Arrangement (the “Transaction”) • Transaction equity value of approximately $7 billion based on New Gold’s basic common shares outstanding • Coeur and New Gold shareholders to own approximately 62% and 38% of the outstanding common shares of the combined company, respectively Consideration • New Gold shareholders to receive 0.4959 of a Coeur share for each New Gold share held, which implies consideration of $8.51 per New Gold share based on the closing price of Coeur on the NYSE on October 31, 2025 − Implies a 16% premium based on New Gold’s closing share price on the NYSE American on October 31, 2025 Approvals and Conditions • Unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of Coeur and New Gold • Directors and senior officers of New Gold and Coeur have entered into voting support agreements, pursuant to which they will vote their common shares held in favor of the Transaction • Requires approval by a British Columbia court, approval by 66 2/3% of the votes by the shareholders of New Gold and the majority of votes cast by the stockholders of Coeur1 • Requires regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of certain other closing conditions customary for a transaction of this nature Other • Customary deal protections, including reciprocal fiduciary-out provisions, non-solicitation covenants, and the right to match any superior proposals • Break fees of approximately $255 million payable by New Gold and approximately $414 million payable by Coeur in certain circumstances • Upon closing, current New Gold’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Director, Patrick Godin and one other current New Gold Director are expected to join Coeur’s board of directors Timing • Shareholder meetings expected to be held in the first quarter of 2026 • Transaction expected to close in H1 2026
Page 8
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 8 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE New Afton Overview Source: New Gold disclosure. (1) Figures are in U.S. dollars as reported under IFRS. (2) Free cash flow calculated as operating cash flow less capital expenditures. The New Afton Mine in British Columbia is a low-cost gold and copper operation, with strong near-term expected production and cash flow growth, and excellent mine life extension potential at the K-Zone Summary StatisticsAsset Overview 3-Year Production Guidance Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) YTD 2025 Production OCF $197M FCF2 $115M Revenue $323M Copper 39.1M lbs Gold 50.2K oz Location Kamloops, British Columbia Ownership 100% Employees 700 Type Underground Metals Gold, copper, silver Years in Operation 13 years Current Reserve Mine Life 2031 -- 40 80 120 160 2025E 2026E 2027E -- 30 60 90 120 2025E 2026E 2027E YTD Financial Results1 Guidance Range Midpoint of Guidance
Page 9
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 9 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Rainy River Overview Source: New Gold disclosure. (1) Figures are in U.S. dollars as reported under IFRS. (2) Free cash flow calculated as operating cash flow less capital expenditures. The Rainy River Mine in Ontario is a large-scale gold operation that generates strong cash flow as it ramps up underground mining activities to supplement ongoing open pit mining -- 75 150 225 300 375 2025E 2026E 2027E Summary StatisticsAsset Overview YTD 2025 Production YTD Financial Results1 OCF $412M FCF2 $215M Revenue $657M Gold 195.8K oz Location Ontario (45 miles from International Falls, MN) Ownership 100% Employees 950 Type Open Pit / Underground Metals Gold and silver Years in Operation 8 years Current Reserve Mine Life 2033 Gold (Koz) Guidance Range Midpoint of Guidance 3-Year Production Guidance
Page 10
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 10 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE 2026E Canadian Gold Equivalent Production (Koz Au Eq) Source: S&P Capital IQ. Note: All figures in U.S. dollars unless denoted otherwise. (1) Gold equivalent production based on Street consensus pricing of US$3,438/oz Au, US$38.50/oz Ag and US$4.50 Cu. 2026E Canadian Co -Product AISC ($/oz Au Eq) 2,969 682 598 592 543 486 390 336 260 249 Agnico Eagle IAMGOLD New Gold Equinox Alamos Newmont Artemis Centerra Discovery Silver B2Gold $801 $1,026 $1,043 $1,248 $1,292 $1,438 $1,640 $1,760 $1,925 $2,105 Artemis New Gold Centerra Alamos Agnico Eagle IAMGOLD Equinox Newmont B2Gold Discovery Silver A Leading, Low -cost Canadian Precious Metal Producer
Page 11
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 11 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Enhanced Quality, Scale and Financial Capacity Source: Coeur disclosure, FactSet, New Gold disclosure, street research. Note: As of September 30, 2025; free cash flow calculated as operating cash flow less capital expenditures. (1) Aggregated across exchanges. (2) Based on analyst consensus for 2026; Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure. Primary Exchange NYSE NYSE - American / TSX NYSE / TSX Producing Asset(s) Rochester / Wharf / Kensington / Las Chispas / Palmarejo New Afton / Rainy River Rochester / Wharf / Kensington / New Afton / Rainy River / Las Chispas / Palmarejo Operating Jurisdictions U.S. / Mexico Canada U.S. / Canada / Mexico Basic Market Capitalization ($M) $11,027 $5,811 $17,768 61% Last 3 Months Avg. Daily Trading Value ($M)1 $249 $136 $385 55% 2026E Gold Production (Koz)2 425 469 894 110% 2026E Silver Production (Moz)2 20 1 20 4% 2026E Copper Production (Mlbs)2 -- 92 92 n.a. 2026E Gold Eq. Production (Koz)2 644 598 1,243 93% 2026E Gold CAS ($/oz)2 $1,303 $834 $1,077 (17%) 2026E EBITDA ($M)2 $1,481 $1,669 $3,150 113% 2026E EBITDA Margin (%)2 61% 71% 66% 5% 2026E Free Cash Flow ($M)2 $939 $1,177 $2,116 125% 2026E Free Cash Flow per Share ($)2 $1.45 $1.48 $2.03 40% Cash ($M) $266 $123 $390 46% Debt ($M) $364 $397 $761 109% Net Debt / 2026E EBITDA (Ratio) 0.07x 0.16x 0.12x 80% Combined Company % Change
Page 12
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 12 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE ($297) ($9) $583 $22 $122 $521 $2,116 $2,362 2023A 2024A 2025E 2026E 2027E $142 $339 $1,031 $296 $417 $841 $3,150 $3,377 2023A 2024A 2025E 2026E 2027E Significant Additions to Coeur’s EBITDA and FCF Source: FactSet, Public disclosures. Note: Excludes transaction costs. Adjusted EBITDA ($M) Free Cash Flow ($M) New Gold to add significant EBITDA and cash flow, Coeur free cash flow per share expected to increase by approximately 40 – 50% based on Street estimates Coeur New Gold Combined Coeur New Gold Combined ~40 – 50% increase in FCF per Share
Page 13
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 13 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE $17,768 $14,859 $12,981 $11,027 $8,623 $8,598 $6,875 $6,719 $5,132 Combined Company Pan American Alamos Coeur Hecla Equinox IAMGOLD First Majestic Eldorado 1,243 1,117 1,053 788 711 656 644 408 338 Combined Company Pan American Equinox IAMGOLD Eldorado Alamos Coeur Hecla First Majestic 2026E Gold Equivalent Production 1 (k oz AuEq) Creating a New All North American Senior PM Producer Source: Coeur disclosure, FactSet, Public disclosures. (1) Gold equivalent production based on Street consensus pricing of US$3,438/oz Au, US$38.50/oz Ag and US$4.50/ lb Cu. (2) Based on market data as of October 31, 2025. Basic Market Capitalization 2 ($M) Peer Leading Production Increased Scale and Liquidity
Page 14
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 14 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE $2,116 $1,544 $1,474 $1,366 $1,072 $939 $634 $597 $462 Combined Company Pan American IAMGOLD Equinox Alamos Coeur Eldorado First Majestic Hecla 2026E EBITDA ($M) Peer Leading Quality Cash Flow Profile Source: FactSet, Street research. Note: Free cash flow calculated as operating cash flow less capital expenditures. (1) Based on analyst consensus for 2026. Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure. 2026E Free Cash Flow 1 ($M) …Driving A More than Doubling of Expected Free Cash Flow Lower Cost & Higher Margins… Combined Company 2026E EBITDA Margin of 66% vs 61% Standalone $3,150 $2,560 $2,281 $2,060 $1,840 $1,656 $1,481 $865 $850 Combined Company Pan American Equinox IAMGOLD Alamos Eldorado Coeur Hecla First Majestic
Page 15
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 15 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE • Combined silver exposure of ~20% and ~30% based on 2026E revenue and total reserves, respectively • Over 80% of combined revenue will be derived from Canada and U.S. based assets • Adding two high-quality Canadian assets further reduces Coeur’s jurisdictional risk relative to peers • Coeur’s Silvertip project in British Columbia represents further silver optionality Continuing to be a Top 5 Global Silver Producer The combined company is expected to be among the largest silver producers globally, generating more than 80% of 2026E revenue from Canada and the U.S. ✓ ✓ 2026E Ag Production1 (Moz) / 2026E U.S. & Canada Revenue (%) ✓ ✓ 49 29 26 24 20 17 16 15 15 11 0% 24% 12% 0% 82% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Fresnillo Newmont Pan American Southern Copper Coeur Hecla First Majestic Buenaventura Cuprum Endeavour Silver Source: S&P Capital IQ, FactSet. (1) Excluding state owned enterprises.
Page 16
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 16 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Significantly Enhanced Cost Profile for Coeur Source: S&P Capital IQ, FactSet, Street research. Additions of New Gold’s low cost, Canadian mines to improve the combined company’s resilience and optionality throughout the cycle -- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 -- 17,897 35,794 53,691 Gold CAS (US$/oz Au Eq.) Cumulative Global Production (%) Spot Au Price: US$4,003/oz 25% Street Consensus Long Term Au Price: US$2,950/oz 50% 75% 100% New Gold Combined Company Standalone Coeur
Page 17
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 17 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE 12% 10% 10% 9% 9% 8% 5% Combined Company Pan American Kinross First Majestic Coeur Alamos Hecla 2,041 1,243 1,117 656 644 408 338 Kinross Combined Company Pan American Alamos Coeur Hecla First Majestic $27,961 $17,768 $14,859 $12,981 $11,027 $8,623 $6,719 Kinross Combined Company Pan American Alamos Coeur Hecla First Majestic $2,816 $2,116 $1,544 $1,072 $939 $597 $462 Kinross Combined Company Pan American Alamos Coeur First Majestic Hecla Significant Re -Valuation Opportunity 2026E Gold Equivalent Production 1 (koz AuEq) Basic Market Capitalization 4 ($M) 2026E FCF Yield 2 (%) 2026E Free Cash Flow 3 ($M) Source: FactSet, Street research. (1) Gold equivalent production based on Street consensus pricing of US$3,438/oz Au, US$38.50/oz Ag and US$4.50/lb Cu. (2) FCF yield calculated as FCF over basic market capitalization. (3) Free cash flow calculated as operating cash flow less capital expenditures. (4) Based on market data as of October 31, 2025. Peer leading combined FCF yield to support strong re-rating potential
Page 18
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 18 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE 559 385 302 283 255 249 216 214 199 79 Kinross Combined Company Pan American First Majestic Hecla Coeur Equinox IAMGOLD Alamos Eldorado Enhanced Trading Liquidity for Investors L3M Average Daily Traded Value ($M) Source: FactSet. Note: Daily traded value across all exchanges. The combined company will be among the most liquid names in the sector, with an average daily traded value of more than $380M
Page 19
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 19 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Unlocking the Full Potential of New Afton & Rainy River Note: See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) Gold equivalence assumes gold-to-silver, -lead, -zinc ratios of 1:60, 1:1,200 and 1:1,000, respectively. Coeur has a demonstrated track record of successfully extending mine lives by maintaining high levels of exploration investment. The Company also has a strong history of optimizing underground operations • History of optimizing underground mine throughput – Increased throughput rates and productivity at Palmarejo and Kensington through sustained exploration investment and business improvement initiatives to remove bottle necks in mining and processing facilities – Both processing plants at Kensington and Palmarejo are now achieving record historical throughput rates • Proven track record of successfully transitioning open pit operations to underground operations – Coeur to leverage experience transitioning Palmarejo to an underground operation as Rainy River is set to undergo similar transition • Consistent exploration success and mine life extensions1 – Coeur has invested over $285 million in exploration over the past five years, during which time it has added 4 million ounces of proven and probable reserves on a gold equivalent basis2 — a 66% increase and has increased resources by over 50% ✓ ✓ ✓
Page 20
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 20 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE High-grade silver and critical mineral potential in British Columbia Substantial Exploration Potential Across Entire Portfolio The combined, highly prospective portfolio will support a sustained level of investment in exploration to unlock significant and long-term value NW Independencia growth and East Palmarejo untapped potential Multi-kilo results and new discoveries Focus on bringing forward higher grade material earlier in mine life Increased investment aimed at significant mine life extension Extended life of mine and recent resource growth Kensington Rochester Silvertip Wharf Las Chispas K-Zone provides meaningful upside potential NW Trend extension, UG potential, and regional upside Palmarejo New Afton Rainy River
Page 21
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 21 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Coeur’s and New Golds’s disciplined approach to sustainability, spanning governance, safety, Indigenous and community engagement, and environmental stewardship, reinforces their proven ability to deliver responsibly sourced metals and long-term value Shared Commitment to Responsible Mining S a fety Ex c ellenc e I n d u st r y-l e ad in g s a f e t y p e r f o rm an ce sup p o rt e d b y a st ro ng safe t y cult ure , co m p rehensive t raining , and e m p lo y e e e m p o w e rm e nt p ro g ram s t o st o p w o rk w he n co ndit io ns are unsafe . B o t h c o m p a ni e s a r e r e c o g ni z e d a w a r d r e c i p i e n t sfo r he alt h and safe t y p e rfo rm ance En v iro nmental S tew ardship C o m p re he nsive e nviro nm e nt al m anag e m e nt sy st e m s acro ss b o t h co m p anie s sup p o rt w a t er s t e w ar dsh ip, b i o d i ve r sit y ,a i r q u a l i t y p r o t e ct i o n and co m p liance w it h re g ulat io ns. C o nt inuo us m o nit o ring and adap t ive m anag e m e nt sup p o rt co nt inuo us im p ro ve m e nt R e s p o nsible P r o duc tion fo r th e En er gy Tr a n sitio n B o t h co m p anie s r e s p o nsi b l y p ro duce m e t al s e s s e nt i al t o c l e a n e n e r gy t e c h no l o g i e s, advancing e ne rg y e fficie ncy and int e g rat ing re ne w ab le s t o re duce e xp o sure t o carb o n p ricing , st re ng t he n lo ng - t e rm clim at e re silie nce , and s u p p o rt r e s p o nsi b l e s u p p ly- c h a i n s P ledg e to Co mmu nities a n d I n dig enous P eo ples B o t h co m p anie s e n g a g e e a r l y a n d c o n t in uo u sl y w it h I ndigeno us Pe o p le s and co m m unit ie s t hro ug ho ut t he m ining life cy cle . C o m m o n e ffo rt s include e m p lo y m e nt , p r o c ure m e n t , a n d c u l t u ra l i n i t i at i v e s t hat aim t o cre at e last ing so cial value Ta ilin gs M a n agement Po st -t ransact io n, t he c o m b i n e d t e chnical e xp e rt ise and s u b j e ct-m at t e r k n o w l e dg e fro m bo t h co m p anies is e xp e ct e d t o e n h a n ce t a i l i n g s m a n a g e m e n t p e rfo rm ance , driving im p ro ve m e nt s acro ss g o ve rnance , e ng ine e ring , co m m unit y e ng ag e m e nt , and e m e rg e ncy p re p are dne ss Tr a n spa rency a n d D is c losure C o m m it m e nt t o t ransp are nt and b a l a n c e d s u s t a in ab i l it y d i s c l o s uret hro ug h alignm ent o f vario us fram e w o rk s. B o t h co m p anie s have re ce ive d f a v o r ab l e r a t i n g s fro m I S S and S u s t a i na ly t i cs, re fle ct ing st ro ng sust ainab ilit y p e rfo rm ance and g o ve rnance p ract ice s
Page 22
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 22 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE An Unrivaled All North American Mining Powerhouse Creates U.S. Precious Metals Leader Approximately $20 billion combined market capitalization company with seven high quality North American operations, sector-leading free cash flow, significantly enhanced trading liquidity and potential U.S. index inclusion Significant & Immediate Addition to EBITDA & Free Cash Flow Expected to generate approximately $3.0 billion of EBITDA and approximately $2.0 billion of free cash flow in 2026 at lower overall costs and higher overall margins Best in Class Financial Position with Growing Cash Balance Strong free cash flow expected to result in net-cash position at closing and rapidly growing cash balance, creating a clear path to an investment-grade credit rating and stockholder returns Robust Fully-Funded Growth Pipeline Strong financial position to accelerate investment in high-return organic growth opportunities at New Afton, Rainy River and across Coeur’s portfolio Highly Accretive Transaction Accretive to Coeur’s Street per share net asset value, and significantly accretive to operating cash flow, and free cash flow metrics, positioning the combined company for a potential share price re-rating
Page 23
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 23 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Appendix
Page 24
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 24 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Las Chispas (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) Guidance (or with respect to percentages, midpoint of guidance) as published by Coeur on October 29, 2025. (3) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. The Las Chispas silver-gold operation is located in the state of Sonora, Mexico, and is an underground mine with processing operations as well as several other deposits and exploration targets Share of Companywide 2025E 2 Production Gold 415,250 oz Silver 18.1M oz Asset Overview Ownership 100% Employees1 314 Claims 3,462 net acres Type Underground Processing Crushing, grinding, CIL, Merrill-Crowe precipitation, refining Metals Silver and gold doré Mine life ~7 years 357 33.5 2024 Silver (M oz)Gold (K oz) 144 10.1 2024 Reserves & Resources 3 P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources 156 14.4 2024
Page 25
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 25 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Operating cash flow Capital expenditures Gold production (K oz) Silver production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz3 Adj. CAS per AgOz3 1Q 2025 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 UG tons mined 76,855 125,398 137,447 UG mining costs per UG ton mined $115 $129 $135 Processing costs per ton processed4 $42 $41 $37 G&A per ton processed5 $28 $35 $26 Las Chispas (cont.) Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Costs Per Ton ($) 1 2 2 2 (1) 1Q25 operating cash flow includes $72.0M of monetized finished goods following the SilverCrest acquisition on February 14. (2) 1Q25 reflects six weeks of operations following the SilverCrest acquisition on February 14. (3) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (4) Excludes third-party refining charges. (5) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate.
Page 26
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 26 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE 24% Palmarejo (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) Guidance (or with respect to percentages, midpoint of guidance) as published by Coeur on October 29, 2025. (3) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. The Palmarejo gold-silver complex is located in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, and is an underground mine with processing operations as well as several other deposits and exploration targets Reserves & Resources 3 Share of Companywide 2025E 2 Production Gold 415,250 oz Silver 18.1M oz P&P Reserves M&I Resources Silver (M oz)Gold (K oz) Inferred Resources 693 681 50.5 46.0 2019 2024 425 1,423 34.5 89.9 2019 2024 367 643 26.3 34.7 2019 2024 Asset Overview Ownership 100% Employees1 869 Claims 67,296 net acres Type Underground Processing Crushing, grinding, flotation, CIL, Merrill- Crowe precipitation, refining Metals Silver and gold doré Mine life ~6 years
Page 27
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 27 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Operating cash flow Capital expenditures Gold production (K oz) Silver production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1 Adj. CAS per AgOz1 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 1Q 2025 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 UG tons mined 412,201 416,977 444,025 504,673 484,417 UG mining costs per UG ton mined $64 $61 $54 $54 $55 Processing costs per ton processed2 $28 $29 $27 $28 $27 G&A per ton processed3 $14 $17 $13 $15 $14 Palmarejo (cont.) (1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (2) Excludes third-party refining charges. (3) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate. Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Costs Per Ton ($)
Page 28
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 28 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE 737 1,298 117.5 191.0 2019 2024 Rochester (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) Guidance (or with respect to percentages, midpoint of guidance) as published by Coeur on October 29, 2025. (3) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. The Rochester mine is an open pit, heap leach silver-gold operation, located in northern Nevada, which completed a significant expansion that is driving a step-change in production and cash flow Reserves & Resources 3 Share of Companywide 2025E 2 Production Gold 415,250 oz Silver 18.1M oz P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources Asset Overview Ownership 100% Employees1 431 Claims 17,044 net acres Type Open pit and heap leach Processing Crushing, dump heap leaching, Merrill-Crowe precipitation, refining Metals Silver and gold doré Mine life ~16 years Silver (M oz)Gold (K oz) 546 260 82.8 36.9 2019 2024 378 258 60.8 41.8 2019 2024
Page 29
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 29 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Rochester (cont.) (1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (2) Excludes third-party refining charges. (3) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate. Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Costs Per Ton ($) Operating cash flow Capital expenditures Silver production (K oz) Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AgOz1 Adj. CAS per AuOz1 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 1Q 2025 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 Ore tons mined 6,523,611 8,124,737 6,745,667 7,545,264 8,170,836 Strip Ratio 0.3:1 0.1:1 0.2:1 0.1:1 0.2:1 Mining costs per ton mined $2.32 $2.18 $2.32 $2.22 $2.28 Processing costs per ton processed2 $3.71 $3.14 $3.81 $3.58 $3.62 G&A per ton processed3 $1.29 $0.93 $1.17 $1.07 $1.21
Page 30
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 30 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Kensington (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) Guidance (or with respect to percentages, midpoint of guidance) as published by Coeur on October 29, 2025. (3) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. 366 501 2019 2024 The Kensington mine is an underground gold operation located in southeast Alaska, consisting of the Kensington Main deposit and Elmira deposit, as well as other nearby deposits and exploration targets Reserves & Resources 3 Share of Companywide 2025E 2 Production Gold P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources Asset Overview Ownership 100% Employees1 374 Claims 12,336 net acres Type Underground Processing Crushing, grinding, flotation processing Metals Gold concentrate Mine life ~5 years Gold (K oz) 762 886 2019 2024 358 228 2019 2024 415,250 oz
Page 31
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 31 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 1Q 2025 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 Ore tons mined 168,403 210,692 173,370 197,710 168,544 Mining costs per ton mined $109 $100 $133 $124 $138 Processing costs per ton processed3 $54 $49 $50 $48 $53 G&A per ton processed4 $49 $51 $50 $48 $53 Kensington (cont.) (1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (2) Excludes impact of prepayments. (3) Excludes third-party smelting charges, which are reflected in average realized selling prices of concentrate production. (4) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate. Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Costs Per Ton ($) Operating cash flow2 Capital expenditures Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1
Page 32
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 32 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Wharf (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) Guidance (or with respect to percentages, midpoint of guidance) as published by Coeur on October 29, 2025. (3) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. The Wharf mine is an open pit, heap leach gold operation located in western South Dakota. The property consists of several areas of adjoining gold mineralization, which have been mined as a series of open pits Reserves & Resources 3 Share of Companywide 2025E 2 Production Gold P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources Asset Overview Ownership 100% Employees1 258 Claims 7,852 net acres Type Open pit and heap leach Processing Crushing, “on-off” heap leaching, spent ore neutralization, carbon absorption/desorption Metals Electrolytic cathodic sludge Mine life ~6 years 415,250 oz Gold (K oz) 768 757 2019 2024 334 1,019 2019 2024 81 470 2019 2024 1% Silver 18.1M oz
Page 33
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 33 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Wharf (cont.) (1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (2) Excludes third-party refining charges. (3) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate. Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Costs Per Ton ($) 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 1Q 2025 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 Ore tons mined 1,759,149 958,394 826,699 1,103,605 1,422,845 Strip Ratio 1.3:1 3.2:1 2.5:1 1.4:1 1.5:1 Mining costs per ton mined $3.04 $2.87 $3.43 $3.88 $3.39 Pad unload costs per ton mined $0.46 $0.61 $1.30 $0.92 $0.61 Total mining costs per ton mined (incl. pad unload) $3.49 $3.47 $4.72 $4.79 $3.99 Processing costs per ton processed2 $4.76 $6.01 $5.81 $5.12 $4.98 G&A per ton processed3 $2.70 $3.70 $3.59 $3.88 $3.18 Operating cash flow Capital expenditures Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1
Page 34
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 34 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Silvertip (1) As of December 31, 2024. (2) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. The Silvertip critical minerals exploration project is one of the highest-grade polymetallic projects in the world. The site is located in northern British Columbia, Canada and sits within a highly prospective land package Silver (M oz) Zinc (M lb) Lead (M lb) M&I Resources Inferred Resources Reserves & Resources 2 Asset Overview Ownership 100% Employees1 71 Claims 313,555 net acres Type Underground Processing Crushing, grinding, flotation processing, concentrate thickening Metals Lead concentrate, zinc concentrate 11.6 57.7 305.0 1,516.8 143.9 768.7 2019 2024 8.2 16.1 182.2 481.8 105.3 199.8 2019 2024
Page 35
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 35 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Non-GAAP Reconciliations
Page 36
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 36 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Non-IFRS to IFRS Reconciliation ($ millions) 3Q 2025 2Q 2025 1Q 2025 4Q 2024 3Q 2024 Cash generated from operations $300.7 $162.9 $107.5 $109.5 $127.9 Mining interest capital expenditures (75.5) (92.1) (75.2) (75.4) (62.6) Lease payments (1.1) (1.1) (1.1) (0.7) (0.1) Cash settlement of non-current derivative financial liabilities (19.4) (7.2) (6.3) (11.3) (8.2) Free cash flow $204.7 $62.5 $24.9 $22.1 $57.0 Unaudited New Gold Free Cash Flow
Page 37
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 37 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources 2024 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) PROVEN RESERVES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 787,000 0.150 15.99 118,000 12,586,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 3,473,000 0.059 3.94 205,000 13,667,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 468,432,000 0.002 0.37 1,116,000 172,408,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,340,000 0.186 - 249,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 6,563,000 0.030 - 199,000 - Total 480,595,000 0.004 0.41 1,887,000 198,660,000 PROBABLE RESERVES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 2,700,000 0.089 7.75 239,000 20,931,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 8,373,000 0.057 3.86 475,000 32,307,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 59,123,000 0.003 0.32 182,000 18,632,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,427,000 0.177 - 252,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 22,993,000 0.024 - 558,000 - Total 94,615,000 0.018 0.76 1,706,000 71,870,000 PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 3,486,000 0.102 9.61 357,000 33,516,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 11,845,000 0.057 3.88 681,000 45,974,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 527,555,000 0.002 0.36 1,298,000 191,040,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,768,000 0.181 - 501,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 29,556,000 0.026 - 757,000 - Total Proven and Probable Reserves 575,211,000 0.006 0.47 3,593,000 270,530,000
Page 38
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 38 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2024 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves) Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 116,000 0.302 31.23 35,000 3,623,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 6,996,000 0.068 4.59 474,000 32,138,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 82,371,000 0.002 0.28 144,000 23,383,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,150,000 0.254 - 546,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 10,180,000 0.017 - 175,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 734,000 - 10.56 9.93% 7.88% - 7,749,000 145,703,000 115,648,000 Total 102,547,000 0.013 0.65 1,374,000 66,894,000 145,703,000 115,648,000 INDICATED RESOURCES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 1,094,000 0.110 9.87 120,000 10,798,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 15,368,000 0.062 3.76 949,000 57,777,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 40,402,000 0.003 0.34 116,000 13,541,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,450,000 0.234 - 340,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 49,155,000 0.017 - 845,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 6,418,000 - 7.78 10.68% 5.09% - 49,919,000 1,371,074,000 653,008,000 Total 113,887,000 0.021 1.16 2,370,000 132,035,000 1,371,074,000 653,008,000 MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 1,211,000 0.129 11.91 156,000 14,421,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 22,363,000 0.064 4.02 1,423,000 89,915,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 122,773,000 0.002 0.30 260,000 36,924,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 3,600,000 0.246 - 886,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 59,335,000 0.017 - 1,019,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 7,152,000 - 8.06 10.60% 5.37% - 57,668,000 1,516,777,000 768,657,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 216,434,000 0.017 0.92 3,744,000 198,929,000 1,516,777,000 768,657,000
Page 39
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 39 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2024 Inferred Mineral Resources Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Las Chispas Sonora, Mexico 1,276,000 0.113 7.91 144,000 10,088,000 Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 6,577,000 0.098 5.28 643,000 34,748,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 116,521,000 0.002 0.36 258,000 41,838,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 993,000 0.230 - 228,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 26,735,000 0.018 - 470,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 2,345,000 - 6.86 10.27% 4.26% - 16,084,000 481,791,000 199,815,000 Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 Total Inferred Resources 180,185,000 0.013 0.46 2,273,000 106,104,000 481,791,000 199,815,000
Page 40
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 40 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2024 Mineral Reserves: (1) The Mineral Reserve estimates are current as of December 31, 2024 and are reported using the definitions in Item 1300 of Regulation S–K (17 CFR Part 229) (SK1300) and were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2024 Mineral Reserves were $23.50 per ounce of silver, $1,800 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound of zinc, $0.95 per pound of lead, except for Kensington at $2,000 per ounce of gold. (3) Palmarejo Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 2.13–2.45 g/t AuEq and an incremental development cut-off grade 1.05 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 92.0% for gold and 83.0% for silver; mining dilution assumes 0.3–1.5 meter of hanging/foot wall waste dilution; mining loss of 15% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US$57.67–US$74.45/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$4.29/tonne, process costs of US$31.06/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$15.95/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$4.42/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Reserves. No assurances can be given that all mineral reserves will be mined, as mineralized material that may qualify as reserves under applicable standards by virtue of having positive economics may not generate attractive enough returns to be included in our mine plans, due to factors such as the impact of the gold stream at Palmarejo. As a result, we may elect not to mine portions of the mineralized material reported as reserves. (4) Rochester Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated within a confining pit design and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 77.7–85.9% and Ag = 59.4-61.0%; Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7% and Ag = 0.0–59.4%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $3.76/ton oxide and US$3.86/ton sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.24/ton for oxide; Lincoln Hill oxide recovery Au = 63.9% and Ag = 39.5%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.53/ton for oxide where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the life-of-mine. (5) Kensington Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; gold price of $2,000/oz; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.133 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 94.2%; gold payability of 97.5%; mining dilution of 15-20%; mining loss of 12% was applied; mining costs of US$116.09/ton mined; process costs of US$55.14/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$53.18/ton processed; sustaining capital US$4.50/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$97.48/oz sold. (6) Wharf Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: Assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 78.0%; royalty burden of US$140.40/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of US$2.56/ton mined, and process costs of US$12.02/ton processed (includes general & administrative and sustaining capital costs). (7) Las Chispas Mineral Reserve estimates uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; reported above a silver cut-off grade of 250 g / tonne silver equivalent and an incremental development cut-off grade of 63 g / tonne AgEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 97.5% for silver and 98.0% for gold; mining dilution assumes 5% for development, 1 meter to 1.5 meters of ELOS (0.5 m – 1.0 m of hanging wall and 0.25 m – 0.5 m of footwall dilution) depending on geotechnical conditions in each stoping location, 0.2 meter ELOS (0.1 m of hanging wall and 0.1 m of footwall dilution) for cut and fill, 0.4 meter ELOS (0.2 m of hanging wall and 0.2 m of footwall dilution), 0.25 m for each exposed backfill floor, and 0.5 m for each exposed backfill wall; mining loss of 2% for development and 5% for stoping was applied, additional losses have been included to account for the required pillars in uphole stopes that cannot be filled; variable production mining costs that range from US$58.06–US$239.51/tonne, development mining costs of US$27.40/tonne, process costs of US$45.72/tonne, site general and administrative costs of US$20.70/tonne, underground general and administrative costs of US$12.81/tonne, and sustaining capital costs of US$7.64/tonne. (8) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 41
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 41 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2024 Mineral Resources: (1) Mineral Resource estimates are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves, are current as of December 31, 2024, and are reported using definitions in SK1300 on a 100% ownership basis. Mineral Resource estimates were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2024 estimated Mineral Resources were $27.00 per ounce of silver, $2,100 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead, unless otherwise noted. (3) Palmarejo Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 1.83–2.10 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 92.0% for gold and 83.0% for silver; variable mining costs that range from US$57.67–US$74.45/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$4.29/tonne, process costs of US$31.06/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$15.95/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$4.42/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Resources. (4) Kensington Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: metal price of $2,300 per ounce gold, assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold cut-off grade of 0.115 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 94.2%; gold payability of 97.5%, mining costs of US$116.09/ton mined; process costs of US$55.14/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$53.18/ton processed; sustaining capital US$4.50/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$97.48/oz sold. (5) Wharf Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.008 oz/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 78.0% across all rock types; royalty burden of US$140.40/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of $2.56/ton mined, and process costs of US$12.02/ton processed (includes general & administrative and sustaining capital costs). (6) Rochester Mineral Resource estimates are tabulated within a confining pit shell and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 77.7–85.9% and Ag = 59.4%; Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7% and Ag = 0.0–59.4%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $3.76/ton oxide and US$3.86/ton sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.24/ton for oxide; Lincoln Hill oxide recovery Au = 63.9% and Ag = 39.5%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.53/ton for oxide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the life-of-mine. (7) Silvertip Underground Mineral Resource estimates are reported using a net smelter return (“NSR”) cutoff of US$130/tonne. Mineral Resources are reported insitu using the following assumptions: The estimates use the following key input parameters: lead recovery of 89-90%, zinc recovery of 82-83% and silver recovery of 83- 84%. Lead concentrate grade of 53-54%; zinc concentrate grade of 56-57%; mining costs of US$68.77/tonne; processing costs of US$58.20/tonne and US$46.49/tonne, where the NSR ($/tonne) = tonnes x grade x metal prices x metallurgical recoveries – royalties – TCRCs – transport costs over the life of the mine. 2023 metal prices were used to determine the mineral resource which were $25.00 per ounce of silver, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead. (8) Wilco Open Pit Mineral Resource estimates are reported using an equivalent gold cutoff of 0.20 ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Resources are reported in-situ and contained withed a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell. Silver price of US$20/oz, gold price of US$1,400/oz. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 70%, average carbonaceous gold recovery is 50%. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 60%. Average carbonaceous silver recovery is 50%. Open pit mining cost is US$1.50/ton, processing and processing and G&A cost is US$5.46/ton; average pit slope angles of 50º. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the mineral resources if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource report is considered current and is presented unchanged.
Page 42
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 42 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2024 Mineral Resources (cont.): (9) Las Chispas Mineral Resource estimates uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; reported above a silver cut-off grade of 205 g / tonne silver equivalent and an incremental development cut-off grade of 54 g / tonne AgEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 97.5% for silver and 98.0% for gold; mining loss of 2% for development and 5% for stoping was applied, additional losses have been included to account for the required pillars in uphole stopes that cannot be filled; variable production mining costs that range from US$58.06–US$239.51/t, development mining costs of US$27.40/t, process costs of US$45.72/t, site general and administrative costs of US$20.70/t, underground general and administrative costs of US$12.81/t, and sustaining capital costs of US$7.64/t. (10) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 43
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 43 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2023 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 4,203,000 0.060 4.21 252,000 17,698,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 465,919,000 0.002 0.38 1,135,000 177,472,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,009,000 0.186 - 188,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 5,931,000 0.032 - 188,000 - Total 477,062,000 0.004 0.41 1,763,000 195,170,000 PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 8,580,000 0.060 3.88 517,000 33,283,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 44,524,000 0.002 0.35 104,000 15,413,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,109,000 0.201 - 223,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 21,318,000 0.027 - 575,000 - Total 75,531,000 0.019 0.64 1,418,000 48,695,000 PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 12,783,000 0.060 3.99 769,000 50,981,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 510,443,000 0.002 0.38 1,238,000 192,885,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,119,000 0.194 - 411,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 27,249,000 0.028 - 764,000 - Total Proven and Probable Reserves 552,594,000 0.006 0.44 3,182,000 243,865,000
Page 44
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 44 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2023 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves) Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 5,674,000 0.070 4.56 396,000 25,875,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 110,460,000 0.002 0.29 200,000 31,587,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,653,000 0.286 - 477,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 1,666,000 0.024 - 40,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 734,000 - 10.56 9.93% 7.88% - 7,749,000 145,703,000 115,648,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 4,642,000 0.012 0.34 58,000 1,592,000 Total 124,828,000 0.009 0.54 1,171,000 66,803,000 145,703,000 115,648,000 INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 15,500,000 0.060 3.85 926,000 59,701,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 27,170,000 0.002 0.41 47,000 11,237,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,278,000 0.268 - 342,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 22,150,000 0.021 - 458,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 6,418,000 - 7.78 10.68% 5.09% - 49,919,000 1,371,074,000 653,008,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 27,668,000 0.011 0.31 306,000 8,655,000 Total 100,184,000 0.021 1.29 2,078,000 129,512,000 1,371,074,000 653,008,000 MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 21,174,000 0.062 4.04 1,321,000 85,576,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 137,630,000 0.002 0.31 247,000 42,824,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,931,000 0.279 - 819,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 23,816,000 0.021 - 498,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 7,152,000 - 8.06 10.60% 5.37% - 57,668,000 1,516,777,000 768,657,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 32,310,000 0.011 0.32 364,000 10,247,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 225,012,000 0.014 0.87 3,249,000 196,315,000 1,516,777,000 768,657,000
Page 45
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 45 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2023 Inferred Mineral Resources Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 4,207,000 0.091 4.50 381,000 18,933,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 135,104,000 0.002 0.34 267,000 45,959,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,567,000 0.248 - 388,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 7,125,000 0.021 - 149,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 2,345,000 - 6.86 10.27% 4.26% - 16,084,000 481,791,000 199,815,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 22,952,000 0.011 0.36 255,000 8,163,000 Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 Total Inferred Resources 199,037,000 0.010 0.46 1,971,000 92,485,000 481,791,000 199,815,000
Page 46
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 46 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2023 Mineral Reserves: (1) The Mineral Reserve estimates are current as of December 31, 2023 and are reported using the definitions in Item 1300 of Regulation S–K (17 CFR Part 229) (SK1300) and were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2023 Mineral Reserves were $21.00 per ounce of silver, $1,600 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound of zinc, $0.95 per pound of lead, except for Kensington at $1,850 per ounce of gold. (3) Palmarejo Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 2.11–2.97 g/t AuEq and an incremental development cut-off grade ranging from 1.16–1.55 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 92.0% for gold and 83.0% for silver; mining dilution assumes 0.4–1.1 meter of hanging/foot wall waste dilution; mining loss of 15% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US$44.72–US$85.71/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$4.92/tonne, process costs of US$32.70/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$14.06/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$3.18/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Reserves. No assurances can be given that all mineral reserves will be mined, as mineralized material that may qualify as reserves under applicable standards by virtue of having positive economics may not generate attractive enough returns to be included in our mine plans, due to factors such as the impact of the gold stream at Palmarejo. As a result, we may elect not to mine portions of the mineralized material reported as reserves. (4) Rochester Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated within a confining pit design and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 77.7–85.9% and Ag = 59.4-61.0%; Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7% and Ag = 0.0–59.4%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $3.01/st oxide and US$3.11/st sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $5.51/st for oxide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the life-of-mine. (5) Kensington Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; gold price of $1,850/oz; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.135 oz/st Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 93.5%; gold payability of 97.5%; mining dilution of 20%; mining loss of 12% was applied; mining costs of US$103.67/ton mined; process costs of US$55.06/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$55.37/ton processed; sustaining capital US$4.50/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$108.67/oz sold. (6) Wharf Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 79.0%; royalty burden of US$64/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of US$2.44/ton mined, process costs of US$11.71/ton processed (includes general and administrative costs). (7) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 47
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 47 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2023 Mineral Resources: (1) Mineral Resource estimates are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves, are current as of December 31, 2023, and are reported using definitions in SK1300 on a 100% ownership basis. Mineral Resource estimates were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2023 estimated Mineral Resources were $25.00 per ounce of silver, $1,800 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead, unless otherwise noted. (3) Palmarejo Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 1.87–2.64 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 92.0% for gold and 83.0% for silver; variable mining costs that range from US$44.72–US$85.71/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$4.92/tonne, process costs of US$32.70/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$14.06/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$3.18/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Resources. (4) Kensington Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: metal price of $2,000 per ounce gold, assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold cut-off grade of 0.124 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 93.5%; gold payability of 97.5%, mining costs of US$103.67/ton mined; process costs of US$55.06/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$55.37/ton processed; sustaining capital US$4.50/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$108.67/oz sold. (5) Wharf Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 79.0% across all rock types; royalty burden of US$72/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of $2.44/ton mined, process costs of US$11.71/ton processed (includes general and administrative costs). (6) Rochester Mineral Resource estimates are tabulated within a confining pit shell and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 77.7–85.9% and Ag = 59.4%; Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7% and Ag = 0.0–59.4%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $3.01/st oxide and US$3.11/st sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $5.51/st for oxide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the life-of-mine. (7) Silvertip Underground Mineral Resource estimates are reported using a net smelter return (“NSR”) cutoff of US$130/tonne. Mineral Resources are reported insitu using the following assumptions: The estimate use the following key input parameters: lead recovery of 89-90%, zinc recovery of 82-83% and silver recovery of 83- 84%. Lead concentrate grade of 53-54%; zinc concentrate grade of 56-57%; mining costs of US$68.77/tonne; processing costs of US$58.20/tonne and US$46.49/tonne, where the NSR ($/tonne) = tonnes x grade x metal prices x metallurgical recoveries – royalties – TCRCs – transport costs over the life of the mine. (8) Lincoln Hill Open Pit Mineral Resource estimates are reported in-situ and are contained within a confining pit shell and use the following key input parameters: reported above an oxide gold equivalent cutoff of 0.15 ounces per ton and 0.20 oz ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1; gold recoveries of 64%; silver recoveries of 59%; mining costs of US$3.10/ton; process costs of US$3.60/ton; general and administrative costs of $1.50/ton processed; average pit slope angles of 45º over the life-of-mine. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the Mineral Resource if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource is considered current and is presented unchanged.
Page 48
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 48 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2023 Mineral Resources (cont.): (9) Wilco Open Pit Mineral Resource estimates are reported using an equivalent gold cutoff of 0.20 ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Resources are reported in-situ and contained within a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell. Silver price of US$20/oz, gold price of US$1,400/oz. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 70%, average carbonaceous gold recovery is 50%. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 60%. Average carbonaceous silver recovery is 50%. Open pit mining cost is US$1.50/ton, processing and processing and G&A cost is US$5.46/ton; average pit slope angles of 50º. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the mineral resources if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource report is considered current and is presented unchanged. (10) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 49
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 49 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2022 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 4,081,000 0.059 4.21 241,000 17,172,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 425,748,000 0.003 0.39 1,079,000 166,172,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 939,000 0.180 - 169,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 6,379,000 0.031 - 199,000 - Total 437,148,000 0.004 0.42 1,688,000 183,343,000 PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 14,119,000 0.050 3.44 712,000 48,565,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 38,001,000 0.002 0.36 93,000 13,803,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,273,000 0.189 - 240,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 27,328,000 0.026 - 709,000 - Total 80,721,000 0.022 0.77 1,754,000 62,367,000 PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 18,201,000 0.052 3.61 953,000 65,736,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 463,749,000 0.003 0.39 1,173,000 179,975,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,212,000 0.184 - 408,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 33,707,000 0.027 - 908,000 - Total Proven and Probable Reserves 517,868,000 0.007 0.47 3,443,000 245,711,000
Page 50
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 50 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2022 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves) Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 4,030,000 0.066 4.39 267,000 17,689,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 94,296,000 0.002 0.33 187,000 31,452,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,412,000 0.276 - 665,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 1,166,000 0.022 - 26,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 680,000 - 11.47 9.88% 7.71% - 7,798,000 134,462,000 104,870,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 4,642,000 0.012 0.34 58,000 1,592,000 Total 107,226,000 0.011 0.55 1,203,000 58,531,000 134,462,000 104,870,000 INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 16,704,000 0.054 3.42 907,000 57,062,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 15,507,000 0.002 0.34 27,000 5,332,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,309,000 0.293 - 384,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 13,303,000 0.020 - 267,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 6,375,000 - 8.21 9.65% 4.84% - 52,317,000 1,230,898,000 617,279,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 27,668,000 0.011 0.31 306,000 8,655,000 Total 80,866,000 0.023 1.53 1,891,000 123,367,000 1,230,898,000 617,279,000 MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 20,734,000 0.057 3.61 1,174,000 74,751,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 109,803,000 0.002 0.33 214,000 36,784,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 3,722,000 0.282 - 1,049,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 14,468,000 0.020 - 293,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 7,056,000 - 8.52 9.68% 5.12% - 60,115,000 1,365,360,000 722,150,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 32,310,000 0.011 0.32 364,000 10,247,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 188,092,000 0.016 0.97 3,094,000 181,897,000 1,365,360,000 722,150,000
Page 51
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 51 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2022 Inferred Mineral Resources Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 5,633,000 0.067 3.19 380,000 17,948,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 77,001,000 0.002 0.34 148,000 26,151,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,246,000 0.282 - 351,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 3,149,000 0.020 - 63,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,873,000 - 7.70 10.09% 4.43% - 14,414,000 378,088,000 165,985,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 22,952,000 0.011 0.36 255,000 8,163,000 Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 Total Inferred Resources 137,590,000 0.013 0.51 1,728,000 70,021,000 378,088,000 165,985,000
Page 52
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 52 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2022 Mineral Reserves: (1) The Mineral Reserve estimates are current as of December 31, 2022 and are reported using the definitions in Item 1300 of Regulation S–K (17 CFR Part 229) (SK1300) and were prepared by the company’s technical staff. (2) 3Assumed metal prices for 2022 Mineral Reserves were $21.00 per ounce of silver, $1,600 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound of zinc, $0.95 per pound of lead, except for Kensington at $1,700 per ounce of gold. (3) Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: Assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 2.02–2.07 g/t AuEq and an incremental development cut-off grade of 1.05 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 90.5% for gold and 82.5% for silver; mining dilution assumes 0.4-1.0 meter of hanging wall waste dilution; mining loss of 20% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US$44.74–US$47.13/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$4.01/tonne, process costs of US$29.17/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$12.56/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$3.24/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Reserves. (4) Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated within a confining pit design and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 77.7-93.7% and Ag = 59.4%; Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2-77.7% and Ag = 0.0-59.4%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $3.25/st oxide and US$3.35/st sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.40/st for oxide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 43º over the life-of-mine. (5) Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; gold price of $1700/oz; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.133-0.135 oz/st Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 94%; gold payability of 97.5%; mining dilution varies from 15-23%; mining loss of 5% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US$87.13–90.00/ton mined; process costs of US$54.38/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$54.76/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$88.39/oz sold. (6) Mineral Reserve estimate uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 79.1%; royalty burden of US$64/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of US$2.39/ton mined, process costs of US$11.91/ton processed (includes general and administrative costs).. (7) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 53
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 53 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2022 Mineral Resources: (1) Mineral Resource estimates are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves, are current as of December 31, 2022, and are reported using definitions in SK1300 on a 100% ownership basis. Mineral Resource estimates were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2022 estimated Mineral Resources were $25.00 per ounce of silver, $1,800 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead, unless otherwise noted. (3) Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: Assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 1.75-1.84 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 90.5% for gold and 82.5% for silver; variable mining costs that range from US$42.50–US$47.13/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$4.01/tonne, process costs of US$29.17/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$12.56/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$3.24/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Resources. (4) Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold cut- off grade that ranges from 0.125–0.191 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 94%; gold payability of 97.5%, variable mining costs that range from US$87.13–175.48/ton mined; process costs of US$54.38/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$54.76/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$88.39/oz sold. (5) Mineral Resource estimate uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 78.7% across all rock types; royalty burden of US$64/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of $2.39/ton mined, process costs of US$11.91/ton processed (includes general and administrative costs). (6) Mineral Resource estimates are tabulated within a confining pit shell and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 77.7-93.7% and Ag = 59.4%; Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2-77.7% and Ag = 0.0-59.4%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $3.25/st oxide and US$3.35/st sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.40/st for oxide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 43º over the life-of-mine. (7) Underground Mineral Resource estimates are reported using a net smelter return (“NSR”) cutoff of US$130/tonne. Mineral Resources are reported insitu using the following assumptions: The estimate use the following key input parameters: lead recovery of 89-90%, zinc recovery of 82-83% and silver recovery of 83-84%. Lead concentrate grade of 53-54%; zinc concentrate grade of 56-57%; mining costs of US$68.77/tonne; processing costs of US$58.20/tonne and US$46.49/tonne, where the NSR ($/tonne) = tonnes x grade x metal prices x metallurgical recoveries – royalties – TCRCs – transport costs over the life of the mine. (8) Open Pit Mineral Resource estimate is reported in-situ and are contained within a confining pit shell and use the following key input parameters: reported above an oxide gold equivalent cutoff of 0.15 ounces per ton and 0.20 oz ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1; gold recoveries of 64%; silver recoveries of 59%; mining costs of US$3.10/ton; process costs of US$3.60/ton; general and administrative costs of $1.50/ton processed; average pit slope angles of 45º over the life-of-mine. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the Mineral Resource if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource is considered current and is presented unchanged.
Page 54
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 54 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2022 Mineral Resources (cont.): (9) Open Pit Mineral Resource estimates are reported using an equivalent gold cutoff of 0.20 ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Resources are reported in-situ and contained withed a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell. Silver price of US$20/oz, gold price of US$1,400/oz. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 70%, average carbonaceous gold recovery is 50%. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 60%. Average carbonaceous silver recovery is 50%. Open pit mining cost is US$1.50/ton, processing and processing and G&A cost is US$5.46/ton; average pit slope angles of 50º. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2017 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the mineral resources if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource report is considered current and is presented unchanged. (10) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 55
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 55 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2021 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 3,754,000 0.066 4.39 247,000 16,480,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 386,008,000 0.003 0.39 998,000 149,652,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 656,000 0.191 - 125,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 27,976,000 0.022 - 621,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 186,000 - 12.01 10.14% 8.53% - 2,233,000 37,647,000 31,656,000 Total 418,580,000 0.005 0.40 1,991,000 168,365,000 37,647,000 31,656,000 PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 12,139,000 0.052 3.78 637,000 45,875,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 31,769,000 0.003 0.36 82,000 11,593,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 690,000 0.197 - 136,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 8,306,000 0.028 - 231,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,618,000 - 7.67 7.98% 4.99% - 12,403,000 258,418,000 161,569,000 Total 54,522,000 0.020 1.28 1,086,000 69,871,000 258,418,000 161,569,000 PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 15,893,000 0.056 3.92 884,000 62,355,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 417,777,000 0.003 0.39 1,080,000 161,245,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,346,000 0.194 - 261,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 36,283,000 0.023 - 852,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,804,000 - 8.11 8.21% 5.36% - 14,636,000 296,065,000 193,225,000 Total Proven and Probable Reserves 473,103,000 0.007 0.50 3,077,000 238,236,000 296,065,000 193,225,000
Page 56
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 56 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2021 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves) Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 3,696,000 0.053 3.89 195,000 14,373,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 191,889,000 0.002 0.29 372,000 56,573,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,860,000 0.231 - 660,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 13,947,000 0.020 - 273,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 319,000 - 10.33 9.41% 6.57% - 3,296,000 60,029,000 41,939,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 4,642,000 0.012 0.34 58,000 1,592,000 Total 217,353,000 0.007 0.35 1,558,000 75,834,000 60,029,000 41,939,000 INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 17,377,000 0.049 3.41 852,000 59,340,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 39,565,000 0.002 0.33 74,000 12,932,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,263,000 0.256 - 323,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 6,379,000 0.022 - 139,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 2,498,000 - 9.23 10.59% 5.42% - 23,048,000 529,353,000 270,643,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 27,668,000 0.011 0.31 306,000 8,655,000 Total 94,750,000 0.018 1.10 1,694,000 103,975,000 529,353,000 270,643,000 MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 21,073,000 0.050 3.50 1,047,000 73,712,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 231,454,000 0.002 0.30 446,000 69,505,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 4,124,000 0.238 - 983,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 20,326,000 0.020 - 412,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 2,817,000 - 9.35 10.46% 5.55% - 26,344,000 589,382,000 312,582,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 32,310,000 0.011 0.32 364,000 10,247,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 312,104,000 0.010 0.58 3,252,000 179,808,000 589,382,000 312,582,000
Page 57
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 57 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2021 Inferred Mineral Resources Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 4,713,000 0.052 3.70 246,000 17,453,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 128,410,000 0.002 0.30 243,000 38,626,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,915,000 0.238 - 455,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 3,724,000 0.024 - 90,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 2,350,000 - 7.57 8.98% 4.27% - 17,787,000 422,335,000 200,725,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 22,952,000 0.011 0.36 255,000 8,163,000 Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 Total Inferred Resources 189,800,000 0.010 0.45 1,820,000 85,375,000 422,335,000 200,725,000
Page 58
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 58 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2021 Mineral Reserves: (1) The Mineral Reserve estimates are current as of December 31, 2021 and are reported using the definitions in Item 1300 of Regulation S–K (17 CFR Part 229) (SK1300) and were prepared by the company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2021 Mineral Reserves were $20.00 per ounce of silver, $1,400 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound of zinc, $0.95 per pound of lead. (3) Palmarejo Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: Assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 1.94–2.51 g/t AuEq and an incremental development cut-off grade of 1.08 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 93.1% for gold and 81.9% for silver; mining dilution assumes 1 meter of hanging wall waste dilution; mining loss of 5% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US$36.01–US$41.75/tonne, surface haulage costs of US$3.52/t, process costs of US$27.29/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$11.00/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$3.19/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Reserves. (4) Rochester Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated within a confining pit shell and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide recovery Au = 85% and Ag = 59%; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 95% and Ag = 61%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $2.55/st oxide and US$2.65/st sulfide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 43º over the life-of-mine. (5) Kensington Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; gold price of $1400/oz; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.143-0.201 oz/st Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 95%; gold payability of 97.5%; mining dilution varies from 15-23%; mining loss of 5% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US$90.91–150.73/ton mined; process costs of US$46.93/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$38.83/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$60.00/oz sold. (6) Wharf Mineral Reserve estimate uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 80%; royalty burden of US$56/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of US$2.15/ton mined, rehandle costs of US$1.65/ton rehandled, process costs of US$10.34/ton processed (includes general and administrative costs). (7) Silvertip Underground Mineral Resource estimates are reported using a net smelter return (“NSR”) cutoff of US$130-160/tonne. Mineral Resources are reported insitu using the following assumptions: The estimate use the following key input parameters: lead recovery of 87-88%, zinc recovery of 81-82% and silver recovery of 88-89 %. Lead concentrate grade of 51-53%; zinc concentrate grade of 48-50%; mining dilution varies from 5-25%; mining loss of 5% was applied; mining costs of US$68.77/tonne; processing costs of US$58.20/tonne and US$46.49/tonne, where the NSR ($/tonne) = tonnes x grade x metal prices x metallurgical recoveries – royalties – TCRCs – transport costs over the life of the mine. (8) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 59
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 59 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2021 Mineral Resources: (1) Mineral Resource estimates are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves, are current as of December 31, 2021, and are reported using definitions in SK1300 on a 100% ownership basis. Mineral Resource estimates were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. (2) Assumed metal prices for 2021 estimated Mineral Resources were $22.00 per ounce of silver, $1,700 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead, unless otherwise noted. (3) Palmarejo Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: Assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 1.59-2.21 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 93.1% for gold and 81.9% for silver; variable mining costs that range from US$36.01–US$41.75/t, surface haulage costs of US$3.52/tonne, process costs of US$27.29/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$11.00/tonne, and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$3.19/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Resources. (4) Kensington Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold cut-off grade that ranges from 0.116–0.164 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 95%; gold payability of 97.5%, variable mining costs that range from US$90.91–150.73/ton mined, process costs of US$46.93/ton processed, general and administrative costs of US$38.83/ton processed. and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$60.00/oz sold. (5) Wharf Mineral Resource estimate uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a gold cut-off grade of 0.010 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 78.7% across all rock types; royalty burden of US$56/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of $2.15/ton mined, rehandle costs of US$1.65/ton rehandled, process costs of US$10.34/ton processed (includes general and administrative costs). (6) Rochester Mineral Resource estimates are tabulated within confining pit shells that uses the following input parameters: oxide gold recovery of 77.7%-93.7% and silver recovery with range of 59%-61%; sulfide gold recovery range of 15.2%-77.7% and silver recovery with range of 0.0%-59% with a net smelter return cutoff of US$2.55–US$3.70/ton oxide and US$2.65/ton sulfide, where the NSR is calculated as resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz); and variable pit slope angles that approximately average 43º over the life-of-mine. (7) Silvertip Underground Mineral Resource estimates are reported using a net smelter return (“NSR”) cutoff of US$130/tonne. Mineral Resources are reported insitu using the following assumptions: The estimate use the following key input parameters: lead recovery of 87-88%, zinc recovery of 81-82% and silver recovery of 88- 89 %. Lead concentrate grade of 51-53%; zinc concentrate grade of 48-50%; mining costs of US$68.77/tonne; processing costs of US$58.20/tonne and US$46.49/tonne, where the NSR ($/tonne) = tonnes x grade x metal prices x metallurgical recoveries – royalties – TCRCs – transport costs over the life of the mine. (8) Lincoln Hill Open Pit Mineral Resource estimate is reported in-situ and are contained within a confining pit shell and use the following key input parameters: reported above an oxide gold equivalent cutoff of 0.15 ounces per ton and 0.20 oz ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1; gold recoveries of 64%; silver recoveries of 59%; mining costs of US$3.10/ton; process costs of US$3.60/ton; general and administrative costs of $1.50/ton processed; average pit slope angles of 45º over the life-of-mine. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the Mineral Resource if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource is considered current and is presented unchanged.
Page 60
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 60 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) Notes to 2021 Mineral Resources (cont.): (9) Wilco Open Pit Mineral Resource estimates are reported using an equivalent gold cutoff of 0.20 ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Resources are reported in-situ and contained withed a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell. Silver price of US$20/oz, gold price of US$1,400/oz. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 70%, average carbonaceous gold recovery is 50%. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 60%. Average carbonaceous silver recovery is 50%. Open pit mining cost is US$1.50/ton, processing and processing and G&A cost is US$5.46/ton; average pit slope angles of 50º. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the Mineral Resource if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource report is considered current and is presented unchanged. (10) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents.
Page 61
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 61 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2019 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 1,093,000 0.093 5.17 102,000 5,649,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 249,815,000 0.003 0.45 710,000 112,286,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 898,000 0.200 - 180,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 23,436,000 0.024 - 571,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 176,000 - 11.31 9.84% 8.07% - 1,990,000 34,577,000 28,366,000 Total 275,418,000 0.006 0.44 1,563,000 119,925,000 34,577,000 28,366,000 PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 10,576,000 0.056 4.24 591,000 44,843,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 13,577,000 0.002 0.38 27,000 5,187,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 779,000 0.239 - 186,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 7,530,000 0.026 - 197,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,636,000 - 7.94 7.97% 5.14% - 12,986,000 260,847,000 168,096,000 Total 34,097,000 0.029 1.85 1,001,000 63,016,000 260,847,000 168,096,000 PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 11,669,000 0.059 4.33 693,000 50,492,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 263,392,000 0.003 0.45 737,000 117,473,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,677,000 0.218 - 366,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 30,965,000 0.025 - 768,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,812,000 - 8.26 8.15% 5.42% - 14,976,000 295,424,000 196,463,000 Total Proven and Probable Reserves 309,515,000 0.008 0.59 2,564,000 182,941,000 295,424,000 196,463,000
Page 62
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 62 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2019 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves) Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 870,000 0.055 3.69 48,000 3,210,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 194,330,000 0.002 0.35 450,000 67,602,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,062,000 0.239 - 493,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 6,631,000 0.027 - 178,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 138,000 - 10.85 9.79% 7.70% - 1,497,000 26,924,000 21,183,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 4,642,000 0.012 0.34 58,000 1,592,000 La Preciosa Durango, Mexico 9,536,000 0.005 3.04 45,000 29,001,000 Total 218,209,000 0.006 0.47 1,272,000 102,902,000 26,924,000 21,183,000 INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 7,894,000 0.048 3.97 377,000 31,313,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 42,015,000 0.002 0.36 96,000 15,195,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,164,000 0.231 - 269,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 4,926,000 0.032 - 156,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,579,000 - 6.39 8.81% 3.89% - 10,091,000 278,081,000 122,734,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 27,668,000 0.011 0.31 306,000 8,655,000 La Preciosa Durango, Mexico 19,141,000 0.006 3.98 118,000 76,185,000 Total 104,385,000 0.013 1.35 1,323,000 141,438,000 278,081,000 122,734,000 MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 8,764,000 0.048 3.94 425,000 34,522,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 236,345,000 0.002 0.35 546,000 82,797,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 3,226,000 0.236 - 762,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 11,557,000 0.029 - 334,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 1,716,000 - 6.75 8.89% 4.19% - 11,588,000 305,005,000 143,917,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 32,310,000 0.011 0.32 364,000 10,247,000 La Preciosa Durango, Mexico 28,677,000 0.006 3.67 163,000 105,186,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 322,594,000 0.008 0.76 2,594,000 244,340,000 305,005,000 143,917,000
Page 63
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 63 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Reserves and Resources (cont.) 2019 Inferred Mineral Resources Notes to 2019 mineral reserves and resources: (1) Effective December 31, 2019. (2) Assumed metal prices for Mineral Reserves were $17.00 per ounce of silver, $1,350 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound zinc, $0.95 per pound lead. (3) Assumed metal prices for estimated Mineral Resources were $20.00 per ounce of silver, $1,500 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound zinc, $1.05 per pound lead, except Lincoln Hill and Wilco at $1,350 per ounce gold and $22.00 per ounce silver, and Sterling at $1,200 per ounce of gold. (4) Mineral Resources are in addition to Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be considered for estimation of Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the Inferred Mineral Resources will be realized. The preliminary economic assessment for the re-scoped mine plan at Kensington is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources, and does not have as high a level of certainty as a plan that was based solely on proven and probable reserves and there is no certainty that the results from the preliminary economic assessment will be realized. (5) Rounding of tons and ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grade, and contained metal content. (6) For details on the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Canadian investors should refer to the NI 43-101 Technical Reports for Coeur's properties on file at www.sedar.com. Location Short tons Grade Contained Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Chihuahua, Mexico 6,469,000 0.057 4.07 367,000 26,341,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 171,042,000 0.002 0.36 378,000 60,803,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,562,000 0.229 - 358,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 2,483,000 0.033 - 81,000 - Silvertip British Columbia, Canada 976,000 - 8.40 9.34% 5.39% - 8,199,000 182,181,000 105,267,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 22,952,000 0.011 0.36 255,000 8,163,000 Sterling Nevada, USA 32,013,000 0.030 - 960,000 - Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 La Preciosa Durango, Mexico 1,761,000 0.003 3.31 6,000 5,835,000 Total Inferred Resources 264,996,000 0.011 0.43 2,936,000 112,687,000 182,181,000 105,267,000
Page 64
NYSE: CDE JC 2016 64 NYSE: CDE JC 2016 NYSE: CDE Contact Information Corporate Office Coeur Mining, Inc. 200 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60606 Main Telephone +1 (312) 489 -5800 Stock Ticker NYSE: CDE Website www.coeur.com Contact Jeff Wilhoit Senior Director, Investor Relations investors@coeur.com Corporate Office New Gold, Inc. Brookfield Place 181 Bay Street, Suite 3320 Toronto, Ontario V6C 3P1 Main Telephone +1 (416) 324 -6000 Stock Ticker TSX: NGD NYSE: NGD Website www.newgold.com Contact Brandon Throop Director, Investor Relations invest@newgold.com