Good afternoon. My name is Jamaria, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Cadence Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Per the company, please limit your questions to one primary question and one follow-up question. Thank you. I will now turn the call over to Alan Lindstrom, Senior Group Director of Investor Relations for Cadence. Please go ahead. Thank you, Jamaria. I would like to welcome everyone to our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2021 earnings conference call. I am joined today by Anirudh Devgan, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John Wall, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The webcast of this call is available through our website, cadence.com, and will be archived through March 18th, 2022. A copy of today's prepared remarks will also be available on our website at the conclusion of the call today. Please note that the discussion today will contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our business outlook, product development, business strategy and plans, industry and regulatory trends, market size, opportunities, and positioning. Due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those projected or implied in today's discussion. For information on the factors that could cause a difference in our results, please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These include Cadence's most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, and the cautionary comments regarding forward-looking statements in today's earnings press release. Please note that our 2021 Form 10-K was filed about 1:30 P.M. today, Pacific Time. You should not rely on our forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All such statements are based on estimates and information available to us at this time, and Cadence disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements except as required by law. In addition to the financial results prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP, we will also present certain non-GAAP financial measures today. Cadence management believes that in addition to using GAAP results in evaluating our business, it can also be useful to review results using certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for GAAP results. These non-GAAP financial measures are not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures from other companies. Investors and potential investors are encouraged to review the reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures with their most direct comparable GAAP financial results in today's earnings press release. Copies of today's press release dated February 22, 2022 for the quarter and fiscal year ended January 1, 2022, related financial tables, and the CFO commentary are also available on our website. For the Q&A session today, we'd also ask that you observe a limit of one question and one follow-up. You may re-queue if you would like to ask additional questions and time permits. Now we'll turn the call over to Anirudh. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'm pleased to report that Cadence delivered outstanding financial results for 2021 as we exceeded our original growth target, achieving 11% revenue growth, 37% non-GAAP operating margin, and operating cash flow of over $1 billion. Generational trends such as 5G, hyperscale computing, and AI/ML are propelling the digital transformation of multiple end markets and fueling a golden era for semiconductors and electronic systems. With robust design activity providing a strong tailwind, we expect our innovative solutions to continue driving broad-based business momentum in 2021 and 2022, accelerating revenue growth and profitability. John will provide more details in a moment. Our intelligence system design strategy triples our total available market and our compelling portfolio of chip, package, board, and system design solutions, leveraging our computational software expertise uniquely positions us to capture a wide range of exciting opportunities. During the year, we significantly expanded our core EDA and IP solutions footprint with market-shaping customers. As new customers accelerated their adoption of our expanding systems portfolio, we deepened our partnerships with leading foundry, IP, and cloud service providers and launched key strategic initiatives. Earlier today, we announced an exciting strategic partnership with Dassault Systèmes. That brings together Cadence, Allegro, and Dassault's 3DEXPERIENCE platforms to provide virtual twin experiences for optimizing the entire value chain for electromechanical system modeling, design, simulation, and product lifecycle management. Central to our strategy is a relentless commitment to innovation. In 2021, we introduced 13 significant differentiated products across our business groups that will be key to our future growth. Now, let's talk about some of the product highlights for both Q4 and 2021. Our digital and signoff business had another strong year with 10% revenue growth. Deployment of our digital full flow, delivering industry-leading quality of results at the most advanced nodes, continued to accelerate as more than 45 additional customers adopted it during the year. In 2021, we strengthened our relationship with OPPO, a leading mobile phone manufacturer in China, with our digital full flow and an expansion of our system design and analysis product. We expanded our relationship with Socionext, who used our digital full flow, delivering the best quality of results to successfully tape out several advanced node automotive and hyperscaler designs. Our transformative Cadence Cerebrus solution incorporates sophisticated ML technologies to explore the entire design space and intelligently optimize the digital full flow in an automated manner. Several leading customers are increasingly deploying Cadence Cerebrus in production design and getting exceptional power, performance, area, and productivity benefits, including a market-shaping U.S. automotive company that reduced the power consumption of critical 5nm SoC AI blocks by nearly 10% in just two weeks. Additionally, a premier Asia-Pacific system company reduced power of their 4nm design by 10% with one-tenth the effort of manual optimization, and then applied the Cadence Cerebrus trained ML model to other designs, further improving their power and productivity. Cadence Cerebrus enabled a marquee U.S. semiconductor company to tape out their next generation SoC with a 5x productivity improvement on several critical blocks. Rapidly escalating system verification and software bringup challenges continue to drive heavy demand for our verification full flow solutions, delivering industry-leading verification throughput. Our verification business grew 20% year-over-year, fueled by a record year for hardware. Our next generation Palladium Z2 and Protium X2 platforms provide best-in-class solutions to address system verification and software bring up challenges of complex multi-billion gate designs. Demand for these platforms that were launched earlier last year has greatly exceeded our expectations as customers quickly embrace their superior performance, capacity, and debug capabilities. The compelling value offered by the common front-end compiler led to more than half of our customers purchasing both Palladium as well as Protium platforms during the year. Our hardware family added over 30 new customers and over 100 repeat orders during the year, with particular strength seen in hyperscaler, mobile, and networking verticals. Our verification software products, which include the Xcelium logic simulator and Jasper formal verification platform, continued to proliferate, with Jasper having an exceptional year, adding 40 new customers with particular strength in compute and hyperscale. Today's complex memory and mixed-signal high-frequency design underscore the need for high performance and very accurate circuit simulation. Our Spectre platform has been a longstanding leader in simulation tech solutions for analog and RF design. Now with the recent addition of Spectre FX, our next-generation FastSPICE simulator for memory and large SoC design, we provide the industry's most advanced, comprehensive cross-domain circuit simulation platform. Several leading customers have already deployed Spectre FX on their production designs, such as SK hynix has successfully evaluated and deployed the Spectre FX simulation solution to improve their design methodology and productivity in DRAM verification. Micron adopted Spectre FX simulator as it gave very compelling FastSPICE simulation performance for accurate verification of their DRAM and flash design. In 2021, our IP business grew in multiple vertical markets, including mobile, 5G, hyperscaler, and automotive. Our leadership DDR and PCI IP portfolio continued to proliferate at the 5 nanometer and lower process nodes. Our design IP portfolio had several wins at top customers, including a significant expansion at a marquee U.S. semiconductor company. Our Tensilica DSP portfolio continued expanding its footprint in audio, imaging, computer vision, and ML applications. During the year, we introduced the Tensilica AI platform, delivering scalable and energy efficient on-device to edge AI processing. Rising system complexity for advanced 5G automotive and HPC application is driving the need for a seamless platform solution across design, simulation, and analysis. Our system design and analysis business that is driving our expansion beyond EDA continued its strong momentum, delivering 18% year-over-year growth. There is rapidly growing demand for sophisticated multi-die integration packaging solutions, and our revolutionary Integrity 3D-IC solution, providing tightly integrated system planning, implementation, and analysis technologies, has been gaining strong customer traction. Our Integrity 3D-IC platform was recognized at TSMC's OIP Ecosystem Forum by winning Partner of the Year Award for joint development of 3DFabric design solutions, as well as winning a Customer Choice Award for 3D- IC design. Last year, we furthered our system analysis strategy of building out the disruptive, comprehensive multi-physics platform by expanding into CFD domain through the acquisitions of NUMECA and Pointwise. The integration has gone well, and we have added nearly 100 new logos, including competitive wins across multiple end markets, notably in aerospace and defense. We expanded our collaboration with Schneider Electric, a leader in digital transformation of energy management and industrial automation, as they standardize on Allegro X platform for PCB design, as well as adopting our Clarity solution for system analysis. In Q4, we significantly strengthened our partnership with ADI with a wide-ranging expansion of our EDA products, along with deployment of our system design and analysis solutions, which will enable them to develop more complete end-to-end solutions for their customers. Butterfly Network leverages our Clarity 3D Solver for advanced mobile ultrasound design. Lastly, usage of our Cadence Cloud portfolio continued to scale with over 250 customers using our solutions in the cloud. Cadence cloud-ready products are enabling our customers to realize meaningful scalability, performance, and productivity benefits through the availability of several flexible use models. Now I will turn it over to John Wall to provide more details on the Q4 results and our 2022 outlook. Thanks, Anirudh, and good afternoon, everyone. I'm pleased to report we exceeded all of our key operating metrics for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2021. The underlying strength and demand for our essential technology and solutions continues to drive consistent growth across the business. A strong finish to 2021, combined with our relentless focus on innovation, customer success, and inclusive employee culture and continued execution, helped Cadence to achieve revenue growth of 11% and a fifth consecutive year of non-GAAP incremental margin of greater than 50%, which contributed to an increase in our operating cash flow to $1.1 billion for the year. Here are some highlights from the fourth quarter and the year, starting with the P&L. Total revenue was $773 million for the quarter and $2.988 billion for the year. Non-GAAP operating margin was approximately 36% for the quarter and 37% for the year. GAAP EPS was $0.63 for the quarter and $2.50 for the year. non-GAAP EPS was $0.82 for the quarter and $3.29 for the year. Next, turning to the balance sheet and cash flow. Our cash balance was $1.09 billion at year-end, while the principal value of debt outstanding was $350 million. Operating cash flow in the fourth quarter was $216 million and $1.10 billion for the full year. DSOs were 40 days, and we repurchased $612 million of Cadence shares during the year. Before I provide commentary for Q1 and fiscal 2022, I'd like to take a moment to share the assumptions embedded in our outlook. Our outlook assumes a non-GAAP tax rate of 17.5%. At the midpoint of our 2022 outlook, we are assuming our annual upfront revenue percentage will increase slightly from 2021 to 2022. This is primarily due to higher upfront revenue in Q1, resulting from a very strong hardware bookings finish to 2021. Finally, our outlook assumes that the export limitations that exist today will remain in place for all of 2022. Embedding these assumptions into our outlook for fiscal 2022, we expect revenue in the range of $3.32 billion-$3.38 billion. Non-GAAP operating margin of 37.5%-39%. GAAP EPS in the range of $2.46-$2.56. Non-GAAP EPS in the range of $3.70-$3.80. Operating cash flow in the range of $1.15 billion-$1.25 billion. We expect to use at least 50% of our free cash flow to repurchase Cadence shares in 2022. For Q1 2022, we expect revenue in the range of $850 million-$870 million. Non-GAAP operating margin of 40%-41%. GAAP EPS in the range of $0.70-$0.74. Non-GAAP EPS in the range of $1.00-$1.04. We expect to repurchase approximately $250 million of Cadence shares in Q1. Our CFO commentary, which is available on our website, includes our outlook for additional items as well as further analysis and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations. In conclusion, I would like to take a moment to acknowledge the entire Cadence team for continuously improving our three-year revenue growth CAGR and delivering over 50% incremental margin for five years in a row. As a result of the compounding impact of all their efforts, I am pleased that at the midpoint of our outlook, we expect revenue growth of 12% and over 38% non-GAAP operating margin for 2022. As always, I'd like to close by thanking our customers, partners, and our employees for their continued support. With that operator, we'll now take questions. At this time, I would like to remind everyone who wants to ask a question, please press star then the number one on your telephone keypad now. Per the company, please limit your questions to one primary question and one follow-up question. We will pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question will come from the line of Joe Vruwink with Baird. Please proceed with your question. Great. Hi, everyone. I wanted to start, in the past, Cadence has alluded to certain product segments maybe having a faster growth opportunity over the course of an upcoming year. I'm curious if maybe you could give an updated rank ordering, and I guess two questions. One, would maybe the growth skew a bit more towards verification in 2022, given the ongoing new product cycle you've alluded to? And then, maybe 1b to this question, is there any region that might contribute outsized growth for Cadence over the coming year? Yeah, Joe, this is a great question, and let me start, and then John can comment more. I think what I would like to say is that, you know, we feel that all business groups in all product areas and all regions are performing well at this time. We feel pretty good where we are and the design activity we see. We are expecting good growth across our portfolio, and I think we feel good with how we are positioned. Yeah, Joe, I would add to that, if you look at the CFO commentary on page five, we've outlined a three-year revenue CAGR by product category. I find that the most interesting view for me because it's typically one contract cycle with customers. If you look at how we finished 2021, you have kind of strong double-digit growth across all lines of business, with the exception of custom IC, which is high single-digit growth. Looking at the guide that we have for 2022, I'm expecting slight improvements on all of those, for 2022 over 2021. The one I've hedged back a little bit was IP. I've got low teens growth in the guide for IP, for 2022. There may be upside to that, but right now I feel comfortable with low teens. Okay. That's great. Then just on the outlook and maybe more of a midterm focus question, but if I leave 1Q aside, given the elevated upfront product contribution, it seems like the rates of growth for the remainder of the year are not too far from these three-year CAGRs we're talking about, you know, 11%, 12%. As you kind of think midterm and you know, we've gotten some midterm frameworks from some of your peers in the space, would you expect Cadence to deviate that much from kind of these 11%, 12%, 13% rates of growth? As you say, you seem to have quite a good degree of visibility, so it seems like it may be sustainable, but curious on your thoughts there. Yeah, I can take that one. On that, Joe, I think you're right to assume that. We're expecting a very strong Q1 and we have a lot of visibility into core EDA. You know, we continue to expect like double-digit growth there. I called out IP. IP, we typically aim for low teens. If you look at the three-year CAGR, you know, we've achieved mid-teens in that. We typically aim for low teens because we're looking for the highest level of sustainable, profitable revenue growth there. I don't want to give the team the opportunity to walk away from some business if it's not the profitable nature we want. On Systems Analysis, we've typically driven to kind of high teens there. Yeah, I kind of expect that. The challenge is probably on in terms of visibility, it's on the upfront business. On the functional verification side, on the hardware side, it's tough to have visibility into the second half of the year until we get to the summer. Okay. Very helpful. Thank you. Your next question will come from Charles Shi with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your question. Oh, good afternoon, and thank you for taking my question. Maybe as we exit 2021, could management team kind of provide us an update on how much of your revenue coming from system companies versus semiconductor companies? How does that number stack up with the previous years? Charles, I think what we say is that about 40%-45% of our revenue is coming from system companies versus semi companies, and over the years that has increased. It used to be 40%, now trending towards 45%. As you know, there is more and more system companies doing silicon, you know, and semi companies are becoming more system companies, and system companies are becoming more semi companies. That is a good trend for us and for the industry. The other thing is our product portfolio is also adding, as you know, more system design and analysis products that makes us work more with the system company. That's a trend that is positive, and I expect to be extra positive for Cadence for the future. Got it. Maybe the next question is really to John Wall. I think your first quarter guidance operating margin is well north of 40%. I know you have this metric that called out 50% flow through for the flow through rate. As your operating margin kind of gets to the 40% plus, at one point your margin expansion, if you don't change that target 50% flow through, it's going to moderate at some point. I just wonder any thoughts, updated thinking here? When do you think you want to raise that flow through rate? Thank you. Charles, good observation there. Yeah. I see, I mean, we're very pleased with the fact that operating or incremental margins have come through at over 50% for five years running now. It's actually averaged 55% over those five years, you know, and I'm delighted at the start for this year. I think the incremental margin that we've included or embedded in our outlook on the initial guide is the highest on record incremental margin for Cadence on our outlook. So we're certainly targeting to try and drive that up to 50% and higher again for this year. But you know, naturally as long as we're driving incremental margins that are higher than the underlying margin, we'll continue to see operating margin expand. Got it. Thank you. Your next question will come from the line of Jackson Ader with JP Morgan. Please proceed with your question. Great. Good evening, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. On the system interconnect and analysis side, the growth rate in that product segment came down, you know, pretty steadily and precipitously through the year. I'm just curious what gives you the confidence to kind of go from this fourth quarter growth rate in the low single digits back to that low double digits that might be embedded in the outlook? Hi, Jackson. This is John. That's one of the easier ones to forecast, given that we're mostly recurring revenue in that segment. Like you say, we've embedded high-teens growth into the guide there. Like you say, most of it's coming from recurring revenue. Okay, great. Easy enough. I guess on the partnership with Dassault, just curious, you know, what the commercial relationship will actually look like. Also, I mean, I guess I would have thought that maybe Cadence was already trying to kind of go from your PCB Allegro business to 3D electromagnetics and so how does with your own organic solvers that you've developed. I'm just, like, curious how this all fits together and what your organic electromagnetics business fits into the puzzle. Yeah, that's a great question. You know, what I would like to say is I'm really excited about this partnership with Dassault, because this is like two leaders in their respective spaces coming together to address a problem that I think is becoming more and more important, and that's where the industry is going. As you know, the market is moving towards this mechatronics, you know, combination of mechanical and electronic with with software and data on top, and then silicon driving, you know, all these engines and then when you come from the mechanical side, right? Whether it's a car or a washing machine or airplane, the first electronics you see is the PCB, right? The chip, you know, the package and the chip. With Allegro, with our position in Allegro, it gives us a great platform, and then of course the chip and the package solutions. With Dassault, they are the leader in 3D mechanical design and with product life cycle management. This is a natural combination of doing a seamless integration of the data and also the application that span from all the way from concept to design to manufacturing. It's a truly broad-ranging partnership, and it's a multi-year partnership, and we are in the beginning of it. To your specific question on electromagnetics, that's the one specific application that we have and we are developing. There's a lot of things that Dassault does which are completely orthogonal to what Cadence is and our plans are. You know, things like, you know, 3D mechanical design, things like, you know, their leadership in product life cycle management. I think there's a good synergy between the two leaders coming together to address this whole space of mechanical plus electronic systems. All right, great. Thank you. Your next question will come from the line of Jay Vleeschhouwer with Griffin Securities. Please proceed with your question. Thanks. Good evening. Anirudh, we've seen over the last six to 12 months a quite material increase in semiconductor R&D spending for a number of the large semiconductor companies. We call it great inflection in R&D when we look at numbers from AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, Qualcomm and so forth. To the extent that EDA perhaps as a percentage of semi R&D has held steady or even increased in recent years, would it be fair to say that a good part of this inflection in R&D has already been reflected in your business, hence your $500 million increase in backlog over the past year, and this is what it accounts for at least part of your accelerated growth expectation for 2022? Second question, you've had a recurring theme in your technology development for the last number of years of commonality and integrations across the product line. Could you mention perhaps which of the integrations, whether organic or acquisition, might have been the most meaningful for you in terms of incremental business, for example, AWR and Allegro or anything else you might care to mention? Jay, I mean, as you know, I think we are in a, you know, like you said, the R&D spending is increasing semi and the other thing just to point out is all the system companies doing semi design, okay? That, you know, is also adding to this. I don't see any, you know, we see a lot of design activity, you know, continuing to be very, very strong across multiple regions, across multiple verticals. We feel pretty good as to where we are and where the market is growing. On the second part of your question, in terms of integration, we always believe that we have to provide a complete solution. I mean, the industry has to move beyond point tools that used to happen, you know, five, 10 years ago to more of these comprehensive solutions. We have driven that across all segments, you know, whether it's digital implementation starting from 2015, you know, to verification, now system design and analysis, and also at the same time partner with the right leaders as it makes sense, you know, like we did with MATLAB few years ago and now with Dassault. In terms of return, I think, you know, there are a lot of areas which are growing. You know, the whole 3D- IC and chiplet-based design, I think that's growing nicely and the whole notion of Integrity and the overall solution together with analysis and implementation can provide a good vector. There's a whole hardware platform, you know, Palladium and Protium with a common compiler, and then integration with rest of the verification suite. I think this still has a lot of legs to go, a lot of growth can happen there. The third area I would highlight is truly excited is Cadence Cerebrus and this integration of AI driving chip design. I think we are still in the early innings and results are phenomenal, and I think that can provide a lot of growth going forward. Just to pick like these three top things, Jay, to highlight with 3D- IC design being one of them, you know, the whole verification and software bring up being another one, and then AI-based design and Cerebrus being the third one. Okay. Clarification on the Dassault relationship. Would it be fair to say that it pertains to both your direct and indirect channels and perhaps both their indirect channels? Yes. Jay, this is a wide-ranging arrangement like you said, and we'll start with enterprise and then go to the other parts of the market. Okay, great. Thanks, Anirudh. Thanks, John. Your next question will come from the line of Pradeep Ramani with UBS. Please proceed with your question. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Congratulations on those strong results. I had a question about the trajectory of margins through the year. It feels like very strong guidance in Q1, despite, you know, or what you could argue is a very big hardware quarter. And yet the full year margin guide, you know, the midpoint is roughly 38.25%. So is there something going on with the mix? Maybe it's a big IP back half or is the guidance just way too conservative? I mean, can you help us sort of understand that trajectory? I have a follow-up. Pradeep, this is John. That, I mean, effectively what I've got in the first half versus second half is probably 50% revenue first half versus second half. On the expense side, it's probably 49/51 because we typically do our pay increases and our promotion cycle effective July 1. You probably see something similar to last year, where, you know, margins are probably higher in the first half compared to the second half, and then we can continue to improve efficiency through the year so that we start the next year higher than we started the previous year. On the hardware side, on the upfront piece, I mean, that's certainly benefiting Q1. It's just a pipeline business, so it's tough to see into the second half of the year. The second half of the year may be conservative right now. I don't know. Thanks. For my follow-up, can you speak to maybe where you are with respect to penetration? I mean, I get it that maybe visibility, you know, into the second half is not clear. Just in terms of penetration, with respect to the install base and maybe even your growing customer base, where do you think we are, as of, call it, Q1? Yeah, let me take that on the hardware business. I mean, I think there are two big trends I would say that are helping us. One is the market is growing. I mean, I think the need for more and more hardware-based verification and software bring-up is increasing. This is true for multiple verticals, because as we said, like, more semi companies become system companies, then more system companies become semi companies. Of course, the reason they are system companies is they have a software stack, right? You have to develop the chip and also bring up software. I think one thing is that the overall market is increasing. The second thing, I think our competitive position is improving tremendously on top of that. You know, in the old days, we wouldn't participate that much on the prototyping side, and we were more on the Palladium side. Now with the combination of Palladium and Protium and these brand-new systems and the power, we feel pretty strongly in terms of how well we are positioned in the market. I think the market is growing, and our position with Palladium and Protium together with the new system is pretty good. I think that, you know, it's difficult to predict in terms of, you know, like your exact question of how far into it, but it still appears to me that both of these are net positive. The market will continue to expand over the next few years, and we feel pretty good about our market position there. Thank you. Your next question will come from the line of Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo Securities. Please proceed with your question. Hey, guys. Hope all is well. Thanks for taking my question, and congrats on a strong finish to the year and strong start to the fiscal year 2022. I wanted to give a little bit of a pushback on your fiscal year 2022 guide, and this is a first-class pushback, so don't take it the wrong way. If I look at your next 12-month backlog as disclosed in your 10-K, it's up about 18.5%. If you back out the extra week from fiscal year 2022, you just grew 13.3%. Under the assumption that the backlog didn't increase as a result of the hardware sales you're expecting the first quarter, why the conservative view on fiscal year 2022 revenue growth? Gary, okay, great question. That, I'm not sure I followed the logic on the backlog growth, but there's nothing unusual about the structure of backlog. I think we have about 75% of the guide for next year's guide coming out of backlog. Now I know our backlog includes RPO plus the IP access arrangements. I'm not sure if you're looking at the RPO piece only. If you're looking at the full backlog number. Essentially, in round numbers, about $2.5 billion of the $3.35 billion is coming out of backlog. Is that what you're getting at? Yeah. I mean, it's helpful, and we can talk more about it offline. On a related note, going way back to the end of 2019, I think, it was you and Lip-Bu sat down for whatever reason, you were projecting a recession. Oh, yeah. You could be right for the wrong reasons, perhaps. Probably. You pulled in some license renewals in that late 2019 timeframe. Now we're about 2.5 years past that mark. So are we seeing now, or should we expect to see some higher level of renewal activity given that we're kind of at the 2.5-year mark? Oh, yeah. Good question, Gary. I mean, so generally in terms of duration, it was typically within our normal range. You know, we typically have most of our customers are predominantly on a three-year baseline contract, and then they'll do add-ons throughout the contract that co-terminate. That generally results in roughly 2.5-year kinda average duration. If you look over a contract cycle, I think we're always in and around the 2.5 years on a weighted average over kind of a three-year booking time frame. Yeah, RPO was up. I mean, very strong finish to the year. We ended up at $4.4 billion. The only thing that was unusual, I called out in my prepared remarks, 'cause I wanted to make sure that you understood that there was a slightly higher kind of upfront revenue percentage in the guide than in the prior year. Typically, I mean, we say, what, 85%-90% of our revenue is recurring, generally, which means that, what, 10%-15% is upfront. Last year it was 88% recurring, 12% upfront. In the FY 2025, it's actually 87% recurring and 13% upfront. It's 1% higher in upfront revenue, but a lot of that's falling into Q1, and that's why we have a strong Q1. Got it. That's helpful. Thanks, John. Thank you. Always. Thanks. Your next question will come from John Pitzer with Credit Suisse. Please proceed for the question. Yeah, guys. Thanks for letting me ask a question. Congratulations on the solid results. John, maybe just to follow up on Gary's question and maybe to ask it a little bit differently, but you know, if Q1 and the full year plays out as guided today, Q1 will be about 25.6% of full year guide, which is, I go back in history, would be the highest ever. And I know you know, the linearity of some of the hardware stuff is falling in Q1, but is the skew really such that this could be an historic year? And I guess as you think about visibility into the back half of the year, especially around some of the hardware sales, when would that start to materialize one way or the other? Well, yeah, I definitely think it's gonna be an historic year. I mean, you can see from the guide in the CFO commentary that the three-year CAGR continues to accelerate. I think with the 12% revenue growth embedded in the guide for 2022, our three-year CAGR is naturally rounding up to 13%, when we achieve 12% this year. Now it's off of the back of a strong Q1. The second half of the year is tougher to predict for hardware, so that's why I kinda modeled it out at 50% of our revenue falling in the first half versus second half. If we see the demand continue to flow through into the second half, then, you know, that we'll take the guide up. It's tough to see that right now because typically our visibility in hardware and the pipeline is about six months. I mean, that's basically how we constructed the outlook. That's helpful. As my follow-up, Anirudh, I'm wondering if you could help me better understand the impact of AI in the design process. A couple questions. What% of the designs out there are utilizing AI? And at the endpoint, what's the intended impact of having more AI functionality embedded in design? Is it higher velocity, higher variety? Is it bringing down the entry cost for new customers? You know, what would be the longer term impact you see on the design business and the growth rate there? Yeah, that's a good question, and you already have several key observations there in the question. I think AI, we are still in the early innings, but the demand for, you know, Cadence Cerebrus and these AI solutions is phenomenal. Actually, at this point, we are engaged with almost all of our major customers. I think if you look forward like 12-24 months, it's not a question. It'll not be a question of who's using AI-driven designs. You know, it's like, who's not using? I think most of our top customers are moving towards that, and we are seeing, you know, phenomenal results. I mean, some of the numbers we mentioned, you know, like, 10% power saving, you know, 20% timing. I mean, these are numbers that you typically get when you move from one process node to another process node. We are able to get these kind of improvements purely on results of better algorithms and, you know, AI and mathematics. I think the value proposition is very well understood and recognized by all our customers. The engagement are there across all regions and across all verticals. I think it's just like to give analogy to driving a car, you know, once you get used to more automated cars, you know, people are not going back to driving cars the old way. I think the new way will be AI and Cerebrus being the primary driver of how people will design chips. The benefits are significant, you know. Mostly in productivity, you know, so the customers can do more things with the same number of engineers in PPA and also geographically. You know, sometimes they have different skill level in different geographies, and all that can be, you know, kind of, made better with these Cerebrus kind of solutions. I'm very optimistic. I think the demand is through the roof, and the solutions are providing real meaningful results. Actually, I expect almost all customers will move towards this as the way to run our digital full flow. The other thing I would like to add is that even though we started Cerebrus with digital, you know, the similar technologies can be applied to other parts of the design flow. Overall, I think this can provide a pretty big benefit to the industry. Anirudh, not at the risk of getting you too far over your skis, against a three-year CAGR that's been accelerating, does the addition of AI allow you to maintain the gains you've made, or does it actually open the promise of even a faster growth rate ahead? I think the promise is there. We just have to see, you know, how much of the design process is taken over by AI. I mean, the other thing is that the other good thing with Cerebrus is that when we run these things, you know, when a human is running it, they run like one experiment at a time, typically. But when Cerebrus done it mathematically, we typically run 10, 20 machines in parallel, and each of them may have, like 16 CPUs or 32. So we're running hundreds of CPUs or thousands of CPUs and multiple design iterations in parallel. So it's not like driving one car automatically. It's like driving 10 cars automatically in parallel and finding, you know, what is the best way to get from point A to point B. That naturally consumes, you know, more licenses, and I think it's good value that our customers are getting. Now, in terms of the CAGRs and all, we just have to see. I mean, I think it's promising. We just have to see, and we don't want to project too much till we actually see what it's doing to the license counts and utilization and what percentage of design teams are moving to a purely AI-driven flow. I think we'll update you more over the next, you know, 12-24 months. The promise is there, but we have to see the uptake. Yeah. Perfect. Thanks, guys. Thanks. Your next question will come from the line of Gal Munda with Berenberg. Please proceed with your question. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one, just let me piggyback on the Cerebrus stuff. Obviously, it's you know, it's like you said, it's early innings, but just to try to understand how you capitalize on it in terms of contract sizes. Does it increase your just contract size and negotiations, so basically for the pricing, or do you actually include it as a new SKU that you know, goes in and it's a direct uplift to existing contracts, or it helps in the contract renewals? Like, when do you usually engage customers on it? Cerebrus is a new product. Of course, we have to make sure that the base products are good and best in class, right? The Innovus platform and Genus Innovus, the whole digital flow. Cerebrus is an additional capability and product that we provide to our customers. It's add-on sale on top of that. I think it's important to make sure not just the AI part is good, but the base tool is also good. Typically, the customers, when they run Cerebrus, run multiple copies, like I mentioned, of Innovus or our digital full- Yeah, that's my question. Would it increase the usage of the core products, actually? Because in the past, you were limited by the number of engineers that companies had. If it expands that, does it widen the bottleneck and potentially they need more of the basic products as well? That's what I was thinking, kind of, does it get lumped together? Yes, absolutely. That's a great observation. Because when you run Cerebrus mathematically, it is running like 10 or 20 experiments in parallel. Where when you're running it manually, you're running one or two experiments. Naturally it is increasing the use of the base product, like you mentioned. Yeah. Awesome. Thank you. Just as a follow-up, we've obviously been talking and seeing the systems segment growing, outgrowing the other segments and continuing to post a great performance there. If you think about the verticals there, you made a little comment around the auto and the hyperscalers and, like, what is the growth you're seeing from the auto, for example, and you know, in that area? Like, how maybe if you can give us an idea of how important auto is for you today versus other verticals. Yeah, that's a good question. Now, in general, you know, auto has multiple aspects to it, right? There's the semiconductor design of it, you know. I think Cadence historically, you know, because we have both we have analog, mixed signal, and digital verification, you know, we have traditionally done well with the auto companies, like the semiconductor ecosystem of the auto companies. Because we always had the broadest portfolio, and auto chips are naturally mixed signal. Now, I think as we have more of these new products, you know, like CFD or system analysis, auto is a very important segment for that too, you know, which is beyond just the semiconductor component. This is actual physical car and the electromagnetics and, you know, the thermal, the dynamics of that. You know, last quarter, we talked about, for example, Tesla being one of our key customers. I think auto for overall system analysis market is a very important market. I mean, I think the three big markets there are auto and then aero and defense and then high-tech electronics, which includes, of course, the semiconductor and the hyperscalers. I think all these three markets are important. As we expand our system portfolio, we wanna make sure we do well in all three of them. You know, like for example, Pointwise acquisition we made is particularly strong in aero and defense. I think to answer your question, we have been traditionally strong in the semi part of the auto, and now with these expanded products, we have opportunity to engage on the overall auto, you know, including the mechanical and the system design. This partnership with Dassault amplifies that connection beyond semi to more system and software connection. Got you. That's very helpful. Thank you so much. Your next question will come from Vivek Arya with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question. Thanks for taking my question. Now, Anirudh, I'm curious if this increase that a lot of the foundries are putting at the leading edge is pricing some EDA customers perhaps out of the market or maybe, you know, making some customers stay at the N-minus-one node or be more judicious about the use of the most leading edge because, you know, given the expense of going to it? Just what is the correlation, if any, between the cost inflation right from the foundry side and the customer's willingness to engage with designs at the leading edge? Yeah. I think the way I would say is that I think we always wanna make sure we address the whole range of process technologies, right? We always are working at the most advanced nodes, and I think that's going very well, and there is more and more investment and demand for that. We are working at, you know, 3nm, and most of the R&D is at 2nm. We always work more and more, right, with, you know, traditional legacy nodes and then now with RF and 3D- IC. You know, in 3D- IC, in chiplet-based design, one of the key things is that, as you know, the customers then can mix process node. Not everything has to be at 3nm. Maybe some chips are at 3nm, some are at 7nm. I think the key thing from Cadence standpoint is to have a very broad solution that addresses the chiplet and 3D- IC part, the most advanced digital part, and the mainstream, legacy nodes. As the customers make different choices, which is best for their, you know, end markets and economics, we are in a position to support them fully. What I would like to say is that there is more and more divergence of how the customers put the systems together, with advanced node and legacy nodes and chiplet, and I think we are in the best position to provide the solutions for the entire set, and let the customers choose how they want to use it, and we'll be there to support them in whatever choices they make in terms of process node and foundries and design methodology. Right. Very helpful. Maybe a follow-up, if I may, for John, kind of two related questions. John, the earnings growth you're guiding to this year is 14%, but free cash flow growth, very modest, on only 4%. I guess CapEx is doubling, but very modest free cash flow growth. Kind of related to that, if you're essentially spending on half of the buyback allocation in Q1, does it mean buyback activity is kind of modest on the rest of the year? No. Can you hear me? Yeah. Yeah, on the buyback side, you know, our first priority for cash is investment in organic R&D, and then to a lesser extent, it's kinda smaller token M&As that gives us an opportunity to accelerate our roadmap. After that, we look at repurchasing shares, and we look to use our free cash flow. Traditionally, we've been using over 50% or around 50% of free cash flow to repurchase shares every year. I expect that we'll do at least 50% this year. As I said in the prepared remarks, we're planning to repurchase $250 million worth of shares in Q1, and that's a lot more than 50%. That's just we're taking the opportunity to repurchase shares at the prices that we see today. In relation to your observation on free cash flow, I mean, some of that's the timing of cash. We received a lot of cash in the last week of last year. But also in 2022, we're picking up some additional or extra cash taxes. There was a provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 that went into effect on January 1st, 2022, that required companies to capitalize and amortize R&D costs rather than expense those costs as occurred or as incurred. That creates a bit of an extra cash or tax burden for us in 2022, and we've embedded that into the guidance. All right. Thank you. We have reached the end of the allotted time for questions and answers. I would now like to turn the call back over to Anirudh Devgan for closing remarks. Thank you all for joining us this afternoon. It's an exciting time for Cadence as we enter 2022 with strong business momentum and a thriving semiconductor and system industry offering tremendous market opportunity. Our intelligent system design strategy with relentless execution and customer-first mindset is driving accelerating growth as we continue expanding our portfolio with new innovative solutions. We are proud of the innovative and inclusive culture we have built at Cadence and are grateful for the recognition we have received over the years. On behalf of our employees and our board of directors, we thank our customers and partners for their continued trust and confidence in Cadence. Thank you.