Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Constellation Energy Corporation third quarter 2023 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session, and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this call may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's call, Emily Duncan, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. You may begin. Thank you, Abigail. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining Constellation Energy Corporation's third quarter earnings conference call. Leading the call today are Joe Dominguez, Constellation's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dan Eggers, Constellation's Chief Financial Officer. They are joined by other members of Constellation's senior management team, who will be available to answer your questions following our prepared remarks. We issued our earnings release this morning, along with the presentation, all of which can be found in the Investor Relations section of Constellation's website. The earnings release and other matters which we discussed during today's call contain forward-looking statements and estimates regarding Constellation and its subsidiaries that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ from our forward-looking statements based on factors and assumptions discussed in today's material and comments made during this call. Please refer to today's 8-K and Constellation's other SEC filings for discussions of risk factors and other circumstances and considerations that may cause results to differ from management's projections, forecasts, and expectations. Today's presentation also includes references to Adjusted EBITDA and other non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the information contained in the appendix of our presentation and our earnings release for reconciliations between the non-GAAP measures and the nearest equivalent GAAP measures. I'll now turn the call over to the CEO of Constellation, Joe Dominguez. Thanks, Emily. Thanks to the operator for getting us started. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call. I apologize if the quality of the audio wasn't great. We are all, if you could believe it, sitting around Emily Duncan's cell phone here because we lost a trunk line into the building. But as you can see from our numbers, pretty much everything else is going well around here. I want to begin by thanking the good people of Constellation for delivering an awesome third quarter. They continued the strong performance from the first half of the year, and they are the best at what they do. For the third quarter, we earned $1.199 billion in adjusted EBITDA. As a result of this continued strong performance, we are again raising our full-year guidance range to $3.8 billion-$4 billion. The strength is not limited to 2023, and you will see in our disclosures that we have raised our 2024 gross margin by $250 million. I want to emphasize here that STP is not yet in our final disclosures for 2024. As you recall, we estimated the average STP EBITDA contribution to be an incremental $190 million per year, with 2024 a little lower due to the fact that we have an extra outage every third year, and as it so happens, 2024 is one of those years. However, we believe that the impact of that extra outage will be offset by the higher Texas energy prices we have seen since we've announced the transaction. So we're back to an estimated $190 million for 2024, with 2025 looking even better. We will provide all of the STP and other updated financials in our fourth quarter call. We talked about this before, but it bears repeating. Constellation owns the largest and most reliable clean energy fleet in the country and has the best C&I and commercial platform in the business. We strategically couple these businesses with a strong balance sheet that, in turn, gives us a powerful competitive advantage across retail and wholesale channels. It translates into a unique ability to give our customers the certainty and visibility that they want on energy costs, as well as to provide to them sustainability solutions. All of that ultimately leads to margin expansion and creates value for you. Before I turn to the operational performance, I want to talk about some exciting developments since our last call. First, as I noted earlier, we closed ahead of schedule on our acquisition of 44% of the South Texas Project, expanding our clean, reliable annual nuclear production to approximately 180 million megawatt hours. We're looking forward to working and forging a strong relationship with our new co-owners, Austin Energy and CPS. This includes working to resolve the pending litigation and explore mutually beneficial opportunities to improve performance. I talked last quarter about the fact that an average outage at STP lasts around 31 days. At Byron, we just completed an outage for a very similar machine in 17 days. And if you think that's amazing, consider that we just completed the Peach Bottom outage in 13 days. I was happy to see that Bryan Hanson, our Chief Generation Officer, was named as Chairman of the STP Board and will begin immediately to realize some of the opportunities we see in that asset. The second development I want to highlight is that the U.S. Department of Energy awarded a $1 billion grant to the Midwest Hydrogen Hub, which includes our hydrogen project at LaSalle. A portion of this award will offset our costs for the project. The award is proof that the DOE and the administration want existing nuclear energy to play a vital role in jumpstarting domestic clean hydrogen production. However, it remains critical that the Treasury Department guidance confirms that using existing nuclear energy to produce hydrogen qualifies for the full clean energy production tax credit. Certainly, we think that the hub award is a good sign, but we need to see the right rules or the hub won't happen. Third, we signed a deal with ComEd to power its facility with hourly matched, clean, carbon-free energy, which I'll cover in more detail in a few minutes. And finally, probably the most exciting thing is that we earned a 2023 Great Place to Work certification. Really proud of this because it's based on how our employees rate their experience at Constellation. 5,000 of our colleagues participated in the survey, and 81% of them said that Constellation is a great place to work. That's 24 percentage points higher than the average U.S. company. Our people are talented, hardworking, and they're passionate about what they do, and that shows up in our results over and over again. Our culture and our mission is also an asset in attracting the best talent in the market. We've onboarded 3,000 new colleagues since separation. That's pretty incredible for a workforce of about 14,000 people. Now I'll turn to the quarterly operational updates, starting on slide 6. During the hottest summer on record, our fleet helped to support the grid and ensure that American families could cool their homes and that businesses had the electricity to power our economy. Our nuclear plants had a third quarter capacity factor of 97.2%, but they ran at nearly 100% during June, July, and August. The only reason we're at 97.2% is that in September, we started our planned refueling outages. Our power and renewable assets also ran extremely well. Our Texas fleet, which includes state-of-the-art CCGTs, produced 1.4 million MWh more this year than last year, supporting ERCOT during an extremely challenging summer. This summer, ERCOT was affected not only by extreme heat, but by unprecedented load and the impacts of a changing resource mix. For example, during the summer, ERCOT had 49 days with a peak higher than 80 GW, exceeding the all-time summer peak demand set in 2022, and exceeding 2021's peak by nearly 11.8 GW, or an incredible 16%. The system is constrained not just at peak, but in the hours after peak, due to the intermittent output that comprises much of its generation portfolio. As the grid continues to change, we expect these conditions to amplify, and challenges could occur at any hour. The changes in the ERCOT stack and the hours of challenging operating conditions will increase the importance of dispatchable generation, and particularly clean, reliable, dispatchable generation. The quality of our gas fleet, coupled with our newly acquired STP assets, sets us up for great success. I want to send a special thank you to the people who operate our nuclear and power fleets for all that they do. Now let me move to slide 7. The success of the commercial business is the foundation for our financial performance. This year, they knocked the cover off the ball. We're able to optimize our positions across both the generation and customer portfolios to create additional gross margin, and we can provide our customers certainty on energy bills in volatile times, which leads to margin expansion. We're also leading the way on sustainability solutions. In the second quarter, we spent time talking about the Microsoft deal, where we use nuclear and renewable energy to produce a time-matched clean energy product. We continue to see very strong interest in this product. This quarter, we're excited to announce an agreement with one of the largest utilities in the country, ComEd, to power its facilities with hourly matched carbon-free energy from nuclear power. Microsoft and ComEd are both sustainability leaders, and we're thrilled to be able to help them move forward in their efforts to address the climate crisis through their recognition of the importance of 24/7 carbon-free electricity made by nuclear energy. Matching regionally produced clean energy to the exact moment when a customer uses energy is essential to reaching carbon reduction goals while maintaining electric reliability and affordability. That is why our nuclear fleet is essential today and will be even more valuable tomorrow. With that, I'm going to turn it over to Dan for the financial update. Thank you, Joe, and good morning, everyone. Beginning on slide 8, as Joe mentioned, the business continues to perform extremely well. We earned $1.199 billion in adjusted EBITDA in the third quarter, which compares to $592 million in the third quarter of last year. Our commercial organization continued with the success we have seen over recent quarters. Our renewal rates have been strong, and margins remain above historical levels as market volatility and the desire of customers to control their budgets have created opportunity for our team... as we've discussed on prior calls, the volatility in commodity markets and higher interest rates are leading to more appropriate risk pricing by our competitors. These market conditions create opportunity for us to optimize our combined portfolio of generation and load, which we see in results for 2023, and as we look out to 2024 and 2025, with favorable gross margin uplift that I'll talk about in a moment. On the generation front, our nuclear and power fleets performed extremely well during a record-setting hot summer. As Joe said, our nuclear fleet ran full out during June, July, and August. And as a result of the extreme heat and load growth in Texas, ERCOT set 10 new peak demand records during the summer. In addition to record peaks, we observed more significant operating conditions in the subsequent hours after the peak load due to low intermittent output and a stretched thermal fleet, which at times resulted in prices above $1,000/MWh and at the $5,000 cap for a few hours. Investments we made in our Texas fleet in advance of summer ensured we were ready to help support the grid when the plants were needed, and they ran more than they did the previous year. Through September, our Texas plants ran 13% more than they did last year. Turning to slide 9 and our gross margin outlook, we've increased our gross margin forecast for 2023 and 2024, incorporating the continued strong execution and performance Joe and I have discussed. For 2023, total gross margin increased by $400 million to $9.2 billion. Our projected gross margin is now $850 million higher than our expectations when we began the year, reinforcing the unparalleled operating environment we have seen this year. In 2024, our total gross margin, including PTCs, is $9.45 billion. Total gross margin increased by $250 million from our last update. Market prices increased across the major regions relative to last quarter. As a result, we expect to earn less nuclear PTC revenues at our four plants without state support due to higher expected gross receipts. Turning to our commercial business, as we renew existing contracts and enter into new ones, we are seeing the favorable margin trends with our C&I customers and load auctions extending out into 2025. We have seen some moderation in margins from highs earlier this year and more participants in load auctions, but see opportunity for these margin trends to continue for some time as we anticipate sustained commodity market volatility, in part due to the changing composition of the generation stack. With the strength of our balance sheet, along with our integrated generation and load business, we are well positioned during this volatile environment to continue meeting our customers' needs while also creating value for our shareholders. Moving to slide 10. We are raising our full-year Adjusted EBITDA guidance outlook by $400 million to a $3.9 billion midpoint and narrowing the range to $3.8 billion-$4 billion. This upward revision reflects the significant increase to our gross margin forecast since the beginning of the year. As we flagged last quarter, the gross margin upside is somewhat tempered by an increase to O&M, driven primarily by increased compensation for our employees, including stock compensation, due to the strong financial performance of the company. I should note that just considering that we just closed the STP acquisition last week, our gross margin and cost forecasts do not yet reflect STP. We'll layer that plan into our year-end disclosures. That said, our updated EBITDA guidance for 2023 includes STP for November and December, which is a relatively small part of the increase to our guidance. And as Joe mentioned in his remarks, we anticipate contribution from STP to at least meet the $190 million of EBITDA starting in 2024, which, again, is not reflected in the gross margin or cost disclosures in our earnings materials today. Turning to the financing and liquidity update on slide 11. To help fund the STP transaction, we issued $1.4 billion of debt, including $900 million of 30-year and $500 million of 10-year senior unsecured notes. We saw significant demand, with order books peaking at 7 times across both tranches. We also achieved very tight pricing when we looked at both spreads to Treasuries and between the 10- and 30-year tranches, pricing competitively with recent utility holding company transactions. We appreciate the support from our fixed-income owners and the vote of confidence in the long-term need for our assets into the 2050s and well into their next license lives to 80 years. As we stated at the time of the announcement, the transaction would be credit neutral, and a debt issuance did not strain our forward credit metrics. In fact, our credit metrics are now projected to be at or above the 35% in Moody's and 45% in S&P that we laid out at the beginning of the year, due to the additional cash flows captured in our earnings guidance. We continue to execute on our commitment to return capital to our shareholders, completed another $250 million of share buybacks during the third quarter... When we look at the opportunities ahead of us, we still see our stock as attractive at current levels, and we'll continue to be opportunistic with the remaining $250 million authorized by our board. As we discussed in June, we have $1.2 billion of unallocated capital for 2023 and 2024, which will be used to create additional shareholder value through growth investments, M&A, or return of capital to our owners. I should remind you that this $1.2 billion is based on our disclosures at year-end 2022, that we shared on the fourth quarter call, and does not reflect any additional cash created by this year's outperformance and upward revisions to next year's expectations. We'll provide an updated view of all this on our fourth quarter call. I'll turn the call back now to Joe for his closing remarks. Thanks, Dan. So, you know, the management team here remains focused on creating value for our shareholders. You know our business is unique, and we continue to have many unique opportunities in front of us. As you know, we're the best operator of nuclear plants and the largest producer of carbon-free electricity in the U.S. And now with STP, we'll make more than 180 million megawatt hours annually just from our nuclear fleet. Our commercial business serves more than 22% of the competitive C&I market in the United States, and is helping customers like Microsoft and ComEd meet their sustainability goals through products like our hourly matching product. Our businesses are essential to addressing the climate crisis, and our assets are durable. The IRA provides long-term commitment to nuclear energy as part of the national security of this great nation. We have many ways to grow and bring even more value to our shareholders against a baseline earnings level supported by the PTC. And over the life of the PTC, we'll benefit from price floor inflation. We have opportunities ahead of us to create additional value for the clean, reliable nuclear energy that we provide, like hydrogen, data centers, and expanding our hourly matched product. We have the ability to relicense our nuclear fleet to run at least 80 years without needing to replace it. We have many ways to grow and bring more value to shareholders. We generate strong free cash flow that can be used to fund robust organic growth at double-digit unlevered returns, pursue disciplined M&A, support our growing dividend, and buy back our stock. Each of these opportunities will create additional value for you, our owners, and we're executing on that strategy. We closed the STP deal. We announced $1.5 billion in growth spend on hydrogen and wind repowering. We doubled the per-share dividend, and we've bought back approximately $750 million of our own stock as part of an authorized $1 billion buyback plan. And there's more we can do. We have significant unallocated capital in 2023 and 2024, as Dan just outlined, and we could use those monies to further enhance our earnings growth and provide value to you. Constellation cannot be matched anywhere in the market. Our large, clean, carbon-free nuclear fleet, paired with our customer-facing business and strong balance sheet, provides us with unparalleled opportunities to create value for you, and that's what we're focused on. Now, we, as a management team, stand ready to address your questions. Thanks, operator. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question at this time, you will need to press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press star one one again. One moment for our first question. Our first question comes from David Arcaro with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Morning, David. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Wondering if you could elaborate a bit on what you're seeing in the competitive environment in retail, just in terms of churn and any changes in market share, as you're experiencing higher margins there. Dan, I'm gonna. Dan covered a bit of this in his prepared remarks, and I'll allow him to elaborate. Hey, good morning, David. Yeah, I would say that, yeah, we've continued to see, you know, a strong market backdrop for our commercial business, both on kind of the C&I side we talk about a lot and also on the load auction side. Margins have been strong this year, particularly strong earlier in the year. Market volatility created opportunity for us as we saw some competitors pull back and get less active, as you saw them put a higher price on risk capital for them to be involved in the business. So, we've done a good job of, you know, maintaining and in some areas expanding our win rates, where we've seen opportunity at, you know, quite strong margins relative to history. I'd say probably in the last few months, as the year has moved on, we've seen a little more pressure on margins, still well above historical norms, but kind of off the highs we saw earlier this year as people start to engage a little bit more in the markets. And as I said, in the load auction side, there hasn't been a huge amount of activity, but we are seeing more participants show back up again now than we had seen in the past. Again, all margins better than history, but we're keeping a close eye on that trend as we go through the rest of this year. Got it. Yeah, that's helpful color. And does the latest guidance update, does that kind of fully reflect the patterns that you're seeing so far in 4Q? You know, if, if the, if the dynamics that you experienced in 3Q continue here, are there further opportunities to kind of bolster the outlook into 2024? Yeah, as we continue to add business, I think, you know, we've taken a reasonable approach to our expectations for margins next year. As I said, we're assuming the world stays better than it has been historically, but, you know, we have embedded some moderation in margins from what we're seeing, which I think probably makes sense given, you know, kind of movements in making sure that we meet our expectations for all of you. As we go through the balance of this year, the fourth quarter is an important one to watch. We'll see how much more we can add to backlog for 2024 and 2025. So, you know, we're hopeful we'll continue to find opportunity. Yeah. Okay, great. Thanks so much. I appreciate the call. Thanks, David. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Steve Fleishman with Wolfe Research. Your line is open. Hi, Steve. Yeah, hey, good morning. Good work, Emily, with your cell phone there. So, just on the remaining IRA things that we're kind of watching here, the hydrogen PTC rules and then, of course, the nuclear PTC, could you just give us latest thoughts on timing of those? And then also maybe more color on, you know, how much we should interpret the hydrogen hub announcement as kind of, you know, hinting at where the hydrogen PTC comes out with respect to nuclear. Steve, I'll take the last question first. We're obviously in a lot of dialogue with other stakeholders directly with the White House quite a bit. I'm very happy with the way the conversations are going, but there's a lot of detail that needs to be in the rule and be right in the rule. So I would say I'm cautiously optimistic. I think a big part of that isn't just the hub awards, but the fact that I think they're realizing that to really jump-start this hydrogen economy, we're going to need reliable time match, clean energy to get the both the environmental benefits on the on the grid side, as well as produce hydrogen in the most economic way and transition the economy. So look, it I'll leave it at that. I think the conversations have been really constructive. We've spent a lot of time on them, but we've got to kind of land this thing. In terms of when it will land, I think there's an understanding within the administration that a lot of people are waiting on the hydrogen rule, and they need to come out with some guidance. Again, not just for the hubs, but generally, you know, we indicated in an article in Bloomberg that I was interviewed in that, you know, we're slowing down on a lot of contract signings and other things pending this, and obviously we're not alone in this ecosystem doing the same thing. So I think they're working to kind of get this all nailed down. There's just there was a ton of work that needed to come out of Treasury for the IRA implementation. And so, look, I, I don't... You know, I, I hear the rumors that they're delaying things and, and all that. I'm not sure I believe that. I think they're working diligently to get this thing done. I don't think the Nuclear PTC piece of this is really, you know, at least as, as insofar as I can detect, controversial in any regard, but it also only applies to a limited handful of players like us that have nuclear assets and doesn't have the broad application of hydrogen or domestic content rules and some of the other things that have, you know, taken Treasury's time. So I think, you know, those things, the production tax credit for nuclear is gonna come in as we expected, but I wouldn't be surprised to see that come close to the end of the year or even in the first quarter. I am hopeful that we will see some guidance before the end of the year on hydrogen, and that it will categorically address the use of existing nuclear to make hydrogen in the right pace. Okay, thanks. And then one other question, just on the, the 24/7, clean, product and, and the like. Just, how should we think about kind of pace of adoption here and interest levels you're seeing? And, this part, part you probably can't really answer, which is just the, the type of premium that you might be getting for this type of product versus, you know, just normal power sales. Yeah, thanks. Yeah, yeah. You know, I think just normal power sales volatility and everything else we factor into the sales of the power. We've talked about historic margins of $2-$4, and we've been clear that we're towards the top of that as this kind of market has reset itself. The sustainability offering is gonna be considerably north of that because it's a new product and provides new value to the customer. Beyond that, for competitive reasons, we haven't really gone into the details of how big the margin is. I think at the end of the day, pace is something that, you know, we yet to fully understand in terms of adoption. We've got 180 million megawatt-hours of power, so we've got a lot of this to sell. It's not all gonna be deployed through CFE. There's gonna be other things like hydrogen, hopefully data centers that will take on the load. The customer piece of this is gonna be a big part, but policy is gonna play a role as states and others think about how they want to procure. C arbon-free time-matched energy. And at this point, I think we're just hitting every opportunity and pushing everything. But it's hard for me to sit here and say that we have enough data to talk about how quickly we're going to be able to deploy all of it or a significant chunk of that 180 million megawatt hours. So it's an incomplete at this point. Okay, great. Thank you. Thanks, Dave. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Shar Pourreza with Guggenheim Partners. Your line is open. Morning, Shar. Good morning. The EBITDA obviously was raised again, but we didn't get sort of that update on free cash flow guides or incremental buybacks. Dan, I guess, can you maybe just provide some sort of an update? Why not move on incremental buybacks? I mean, we got past the key quarter. Is there any sense on, are you saving anything for dry powder, et cetera? Just maybe a little bit of an inkling would be great. Yeah, sure. You know, we had a billion-dollar program in place. We've gotten through $750 million of it, and now without a decoder ring, you can kind of see it's been about $250 million a quarter thus far. And so, you know, we still have some money to deploy. You could imagine we'll be having conversations with the board as far as our updated budget plan, how strong, you know, 2023, 2024, and the forward look beyond that, to inform kind of the next wave of capital allocation. Getting STP done was a great deployment of capital this year and kind of looks better by the day with, you know, ERCOT prices having moved as they have. That we want to keep, you know, looking for opportunities, like that and other things along that way, to deploy, you know, meaningful amounts of capital if they come available. So, you know, we do want to keep dry powder, but we certainly understand that, you know, as we get this program worked out, we've got a lot of capital still around, and getting it back to our owners has always been a priority, and we can't find investments that exceed that double-digit unlevered return. Got it. And then another quarter of obviously outsized market and portfolio gains, right? I mean, can we just maybe unpack that $760 million year-over-year gain a little more? I guess, what percentage is durable margin expansion versus maybe opportunistic trading or more one-time items like ERCOT sparks? Thanks. Yeah, I mean, I think it's, it's probably hard to, to dismantle that as much as, as you would like to have, to be totally honest. If you think about how we run the portfolio, the commercial business becomes responsible for managing our generation business once we get in the calendar, right? So, working with the team on dispatch, how we set up positions, will change. It's kind of hard to say who is a generation dollar or commercial dollar at some point in time, the way you're thinking about it. But obviously, the Texas plants running as well as they did this summer with prices where they were, you know, we out-outpaced our production expectations. So there was some real contribution we got in the quarter or really in the year, from ERCOT. That's going to be a piece of it. A piece of it is the fact that margins have been quite strong, right? I think part of that is we've seen outside margins. We talked about the load auctions, right? Mm-hmm. And, you know, we've seen in the first half of this year what I'd fairly say is unprecedented margins in that business. And so, that's been great. We would expect that in normal courses, those moderate over time, and we're seeing a bit of that, right? So there are some of that was going to be situational to our to this year. On the kind of the C&I markets and the mass markets, we've seen very good margins this year, that's going to sit in the book for this year and next year and carrying into 2025. But, you know, as I said to David earlier, we expect some moderation in those margins as we think about what has not yet been committed or was not in our pockets at this point in time. And then the last part, and it's not going to fully get into, but as we have had with volatility, there's been opportunities to maximize our portfolio in the physical markets, and we've done well on that front again this year. You know, to outsize probably this year and last year. Got it. Then lastly, Dan, for me, I know you realize you guys are still working through your capital planning before the next role, but there have been a lot of recent data points around upgrades for in light of like the IRA, especially for BWRs. Can you just get your updated thoughts here on sort of maybe the quantum of opportunity and potential timing there? Thanks. Sure. I think we've basically said that we think the total universe is less than 1,000, actionable somewhere between 500 and 1,000 megawatts that make a lot of economic sense. Bryan and his team, you know, pretty much at this point, have identified every opportunity we see. We're recosting those. I think they'll roll into the fleet, you know, by the end of this decade, and some of them will drag out even a little bit longer. But, you know, we'll announce those, as we complete the work and start ordering the parts for them. But we see opportunities certainly beyond that, which we've already announced. We just, we don't have an update on that, but, you know, this is one of those where the duck looks calm on the surface, but there's a lot of paddling underneath in Bryan's organization, and we'll continue to work those opportunities. We think they're pretty good opportunities, spectacular results. Fantastic, guys. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thanks, Shar. One moment for our next question... Our next question comes from Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Bank of America. Your line is open. Morning, Julien. Hey. Hey, good morning, team. Thank you guys very much for the time. Appreciate it. Maybe if I can go back to where some of the other last questions were going and speaks to timing and holding back on hedge commitments, et cetera. I mean, to the extent to which you get, you know, a thumbs up, thumbs down, or what have you on hydrogen, could we see kind of an outsized pace of commitments, you know, in the start of next year? And whether that's tied to data centers or whether that's tied to capital allocation in terms of buybacks, considering, you know, maybe the hubs do or don't move forward, et cetera. Just wanna try to, like, piece together the different pieces here, both on timing and then also, are you effectively waiting for clarity on hydrogen in order to pursue more of these firm commitments, if you will? On some power. Yeah, sure, Julien. Look, I think hydrogen will occur for us in two different ways. One will be what we've called the behind-the-fence line, Clean Energy Center opportunities, where we'll make the gas. And what we're looking for in those circumstances, when we make the gas behind the fence line of the plant, is people that'll take 100% of the offtake of that gas so that we don't become somehow, you know, merchant hydrogen gas players. So, certainly continuing those conversations, and there are opportunities beyond LaSalle. But we'll probably focus on optimizing LaSalle and adding more megawatts there first, if we can. But I think that opportunity exists for a number of plants. The other way hydrogen will evolve is through what we've called hydrogen, clean hydrogen by wire, right? Where we're providing a contract, very much like the Microsoft and ComEd-type contract, to a customer who will then use that contract to justify their getting the tax credit for hydrogen production. And those are a lot of players kind of around the country, including many that exist in our customer base. I would say that we've added a great deal of focus in talking to those customers and seeing what the opportunities can be. I don't know yet how fast they will be able to buy electrolyzers and integrate those electrolyzers into those facilities. So I can't tell you, you know, this is a 2025 or 2026 type of thing in terms of actually producing the energy and producing the gas in those systems, and it could be 2027. I think if the rules end up the way we are hopeful they will end up, you'll see a flurry of contracting opportunity for us, and you'll see us begin to scale LaSalle and look at the opportunity to do behind-the-fence-line hydrogen production at a lot of other places. We haven't stopped the discussions or the work. And in a certain sense, I would say this and data centers probably are enormous inbounds into the company right now. But both require, in the case of hydrogen, clarification from Treasury as to whether those projects will move forward. In the case of data centers, those just tend to be enormous things that require a great deal of discussion, and we'll update them. I think, you know, if the rules work out the right way, I expect we'll have an exciting 2024 and 2025 around that, and I'm hopeful, data centers will play out the same way. But it's just, it's too early for me to describe pacing, number of megawatts, impact on the financial outcomes of the company. I'd just say that in 25 years of being in this business, these are the most exciting opportunities we have, and I think, I think they'll have great traction. But we got to get the work done, and then we'll announce it to all of you, and you'll see for yourself. Right. But it's not as if you're waiting for one or the other here on, let's say, Q4, right? Patience is a virtue, as they say, and 2027 is out there. And more to the point, it's not as if you're holding back on data centers or capital allocation ahead of a decision on hydrogen, just to set expectations. No, no, that's right. I think you've described it well. You know, and I've said, I said it in response to Steve's question. It's not like we're yet confronted with a scarcity of the clean megawatt hours that we produce. We've got 180 million of these things, so that gives us the luxury of exploring multiple channels at once. There will be a point in time where we'll be looking at kind of the financial value of one channel versus another. But I think in the early going year, we're gonna be wide open, and we're certainly working every angle. And, you know, none are mutually exclusive at this point. Got it. Excellent, guys. Best of luck. See you soon. Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Durgesh Chopra with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Good morning. Hey, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I just have one question on the generation. Year to date, it's kind of been around that 80%-83% range. That hasn't moved. Last year, you know, I was just looking at the Q3 2022 deck. For the next year, that would be 2023, back in Q3 2022, you were at, like, 90-ish percent. So this is just nuclear PTCs and sort of your willingness to stay more open, and next year? Maybe you can just comment on that, and how should we think about your hedging practice, going forward into, like, 25 and beyond? Let me start with that. You know, I think the early questions we got last year, frankly, after the passage of the IRA, is whether we'd stick with the hedging strategy that we had deployed for so many years at Exelon, and in the early days at Constellation, that it's been kind of generally described as a third, a third, a third. And you know, what we've done is we're exploring all the options that I just talked to Julien about. But we're not tethered to any kind of fixed hedging strategy, where we're trying to get off a certain number of megawatts in a given year. We have the freedom now to explore different opportunities, to be patient, and we have been. I think over time, the percentage of the fleet that's hedged and the disclosures that we've historically used will become less relevant because we've changed the hedging strategy. I think we'll talk a little bit more about that at the end of the year and as we update for next year, and we look at these different opportunities. But, you know, at this point, the IRA effectively gives us the ability to wait and realize the $43.75 at the bus that we're entitled to under the policy. And so anything we need to do here has to be incremental to that opportunity, and that's the way we're looking at the business. That means - That may mean we're holding on to more power or selling more power. It'll depend on how these channels ultimately work, but it's the flexibility that we have now. And frankly, the value that we offer to our owners is to get the best financial results for this fleet we have. And, you know, look, I'll add, it's already been a long answer, but I'll add to it. I just think the value of clean, reliable energy is just gonna go up over time, and that causes me to want to be patient. Without commenting on the technology, I see obviously what's happening with offshore wind, and I think all of our owners could appreciate just how difficult it is to add clean energy, let alone anything that resembles the reliability we have. So that encourages us to be patient as we walk through the transition, and the IRA gives us the policy support to be patient and get the best opportunities for us, for our customers, and for the country. Understood. I appreciate that color, Joe. I did have one more question. You guys have talked about a different or added reporting metrics, not just EBITDA. Just any thoughts or additional color that you can share there? Yeah, we're still working through that, right? I think our plan is at the year-end update, we'll, we'll probably provide a whole host of new measures and disclosures for all of you. We've had, you know, these hedge tables, I think, for going on something like 15 years. Moving out of the world of a third, a third, a third, as Joe mentioned, and getting into the structure where the PTC provides a very different, you know, revenue dynamic for us, it's gonna make sense to refresh everything. I also think that with the PTC being an after-tax revenue stream, us probably talking about earnings on an after-tax basis will make more sense for all of you guys. Understood. Thanks, guys. Congrats. Thank you. Thank you. That concludes the question and answer session. At this time, I would like to turn the call back to Joe Dominguez for closing remarks. Well, thanks, operator, for handling the call, and I'll just, I'll just end the way I started. I want to thank, our folks here at Constellation. You know, when we-- when you separate companies, there's this kind of Harvard Business School thing, that one of the, one of the values you get is that the management team, has, has a good focus and is focused on one line of business as opposed to many, and that brings value. But kind of having lived it, the enormous value that it's brought to us is a clarity of mission, not only for the management team, but for our employees. And, super excited that they feel passionate about the business. The results we present are theirs, and, I just want to end again by thanking them and thanking all of you for your interest in the company. Look forward to talking to you at the end of the fourth quarter. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.