Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Certara second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, David Deuchler. Please go ahead. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you all for participating in today's conference call. On the call from Certara, we have William Feehery, Chief Executive Officer, and Andrew Schemick, Chief Financial Officer. Earlier today, Certara released financial results for the quarter ending June 30th, 2022. A copy of the press release is available on the company's website. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Federal securities laws, which were made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained in this call that relate to expectations or predictions of future events, results, or performance are forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. For a list and description of risks and uncertainties associated with Certara's business, please refer to the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1st, 2022. We urge you to consider these factors, and you should be aware that these statements should be considered estimates only and are not a guarantee of future performance. Also, in their remarks or responses to questions, management may mention some Non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, adjusted EPS, and constant currency revenue to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are available in the recent earnings release, which is available on the company's website. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast today, August 9th, 2022. Certara disclaims any intention or obligation, except as required by law, to update or revise any financial projections or forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise. With that, I will turn the call over to William. Thank you, David. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining Certara's second quarter earnings call. Andrew and I will start with prepared remarks, and then we will take questions. In the second quarter, Certara delivered significant growth in bookings and the biosimulation software and services business achieved mid-teens growth in revenue despite headwinds from foreign exchange rates. Our performance in regulatory services, which comprises less than 25% of our business, did not meet expectations due to ongoing delays and recent regulatory decisions regarding China-only clinical trial data. Our operating cash flow growth, which was not impacted significantly by foreign exchange rates, continues to be strong. We reported second quarter revenue of $82.8 million, growing 18% year-over-year on a reported basis and 21% on a constant currency basis, including Pinnacle 21. As you know, Certara operates a global business with employees and customers located in many different countries around the world. This global footprint has many advantages. However, during periods of foreign currency volatility, our reported revenue growth figures may be impacted. As a result, we have decided to disclose our second quarter financial results on both a reported basis and a constant currency basis to help you better understand the underlying trends in the business, which remain healthy. Reported software revenue was $28.7 million, growing 48% year-over-year on a constant currency basis with a 92% aggregate renewal rate. These results were in line with our expectations and driven by mid-teens growth in our core Simcyp and Phoenix biosimulation software businesses, as well as the contribution from Pinnacle 21. Demand for biosimulation continues to be strong with customer interest and new applications growing at a very healthy rate. We are committed to expanding the role of biosimulation to meet the needs of researchers with innovation and expansion of our software offerings. In June, we launched our new Simcyp Discovery Simulator, which applies biosimulation earlier in discovery and development. Simcyp Discovery Simulator advances lead optimization, first in human dose prediction, and early formulation development. We are excited to help identify and progress the most promising new drug candidates for further investigation. In addition, we released new versions of our immunogenicity, immuno-oncology, and vaccine simulators to help predict how drugs work and to address key questions in the development of novel biologic therapies. The latest versions of these simulators help our customers tackle the toughest challenges in drug discovery and development. We also recently announced an initiative to develop a biosimulation platform for CAR T-cell therapies with Memorial Sloan Kettering. We are excited to be collaborating in the MSK Innovation Hub and look forward to developing a biosimulation model that will help researchers, practitioners, and ultimately patients with personalized therapies. Pinnacle 21 continues to meet our expectations. Last week, we introduced an updated version of Pinnacle 21 Enterprise with a new data exchange module. The majority of pharmaceutical companies are grappling with four or more primary data sources in clinical trials. Data exchange is a data management solution that streamlines the process of ingesting clinical trial data from external sources. This solution ensures data integrity and regulatory compliance while empowering sponsors to maintain executive oversight to drive objective decisions. Turning to technology-driven services, we delivered revenue of $54 million, representing a 10% growth on a constant currency basis compared with the second quarter of last year. Within technology-driven services, biosimulation services revenue continues to show robust growth in the high teens on a constant currency basis. We expect continued strength in biosimulation services in the H2 of 2022 and into 2023. The industry has clearly shown an interest in expanding the use of biosimulation, with strong growth in bookings and new customers. As demand for biosimulation services continue to grow, we are investing in our team to expand existing customer relationships as well as establish new relationships. In our regulatory services business, we have experienced more volatility this year than planned. Our customers continue to experience delays in projects, and our business in China has been impacted by recent regulatory decisions, causing Chinese customers to reassess their U.S. strategy. As a result, performance in the regulatory business was below plan in the second quarter, and we are taking a more conservative outlook on this business for the remainder of the year. We believe in the strategic value of the regulatory business, which generates very healthy cash flow and remain committed to supporting our clients. With our revised outlook, regulatory services and the negative impact from foreign exchange rates, we are adjusting our revenue guidance for the full year to $325 million-$335 million, reflecting an approximate $10 million reduction due to foreign exchange and $15 million related to the performance in regulatory services. Andrew will provide more details to the guidance shortly. Overall, we continue to see industry trends moving in the right direction to drive growth in the adoption of biosimulation and Pinnacle 21. We see opportunities to expand our software and services offerings throughout the entire drug development cycle, as well as into new modalities and disease areas. I am confident our Certara team will capitalize on these opportunities as we continue to deliver on our mission. I now turn it over to our CFO, Andrew Schemick, to discuss second quarter financial results in more detail. Thank you, William. Hello, everyone. Total reported revenue for the three months ended June 30th, 2022 was $82.8 million, representing year-over-year growth of 21% on a constant currency basis and 18% on a reported basis. Excluding Pinnacle 21, constant currency second quarter revenue growth was 11%. As a reminder, the largest non-U.S. dollar currency exposures are the British pound, euro and yen, and the majority of the foreign currency translation impacts biosimulation software and services. We remain well-positioned with trailing twelve months bookings coming in at $393.5 million, up approximately 25% year-over-year on a reported basis and excluding Pinnacle 21, up 17%. We continue to look at trailing 12- months bookings as a basis for forward 12-month revenue. Reported software revenue was $28.7 million in the second quarter, which increased 48% over the prior year period on a constant currency basis and 43% on a reported basis. Excluding $6.5 million in Pinnacle 21 software revenue contribution, year-over-year growth was 16% on a constant currency basis. The growth in this quarter, excluding Pinnacle 21, was driven by our biosimulation software, Simcyp and Phoenix, which grew approximately 15% compared to the same period a year ago, despite the foreign exchange headwinds. Software bookings were $30.5 million in the second quarter, which increased 57% from the prior year period. Pinnacle 21 contributed $8.6 million to software bookings in the second quarter, so the 2Q year-over-year software bookings growth, excluding Pinnacle 21, was 13%. Trailing twelve months software bookings were $113.1 million, up 44% year-over-year and up 14% excluding Pinnacle 21. Software aggregate renewal rate was 92% in the second quarter, and net retention rate was 139%, or 107% excluding Pinnacle 21. Reported services revenue was $54 million in the second quarter, which increased 10% over the prior year period on a constant currency basis and 8% on a reported basis. As William mentioned, biosimulation services revenue growth was in the high teens on a constant currency basis. Regulatory services growth was flat and we're no longer forecasting it to grow at historical rates for the remainder of this year. Technology-driven services bookings in the second quarter were $69.7 million, which increased 25% from the prior year period. TTM services bookings were $280.4 million, which increased 19% as compared to the prior year. Regulatory services booking growth is trending in the low single digits, and we're forecasting a longer conversion of bookings to revenue in this business due to elongated customer cycles. Total cost of revenue for the second quarter of 2022 was $35.2 million, an increase from $27.5 million in the second quarter of 2021. Primarily due to a $4.2 million increase in employee related costs due to billable headcount growth, $1.7 million increase in intangible asset amortization, a $1.2 million increase in stock-based compensation expense, and a $0.5 million increase in cost of licenses. Total operating expenses for the second quarter of 2022 were $43.4 million, an increase from $37.3 million in the second quarter of 2021. The components of operating expenses are as follows. Sales and marketing expenses were $7.1 million compared to $4.6 million for the second quarter of 2021. This increase is primarily due to $1.6 million in employee expenses due to the expansion of the sales force, an $0.5 million increase in marketing and travel costs, and miscellaneous sales and marketing operations costs. R&D expenses were 7.7 million compared to $4.6 million for the second quarter of 2021. The increase in R&D expenses was primarily due to R&D expense from acquisitions and software R&D headcount investments. G&A expenses were $17.8 million compared to $18 million for the second quarter of 2021. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in transaction and M&A costs, $0.6 million decrease in stock-based compensation, offset by $1 million of investment in headcount, and $0.6 million in higher professional services costs, primarily related to accounting and SOX implementation. Intangible asset amortization was $10.4 million compared to $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2021, increasing due to amortization costs from acquired intangible assets. Depreciation expense was $0.4 million compared to $0.6 million last year due to a decrease in depreciation for furniture and equipment. Continuing down the P&L, interest expense was $3.9 million compared to $6.3 million for the second quarter of 2021 due to slightly higher interest expense offset by the reclassification of our interest rate swap to an effective hedge. Miscellaneous income was $2.5 million compared to a loss of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2021 due to foreign currency gains of $2.7 million. Income tax expense was $3.4 million as compared to $1.5 million in the prior year due to the relative mix of domestic and international earnings and the impact of pre-IPO stock compensation expense, which is not deductible for corporate income tax purposes. We expect the rate to come down in the back half of the year. Net loss for the second quarter of 2022 was $0.6 million compared to a net loss of $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2021. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2022 was $0.00 as compared to a loss of $0.02 in the second quarter of 2021. Reported adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2022 was $28 million compared to $25.5 million for the second quarter of 2021, representing 9% growth. Reported adjusted net income for the second quarter of 2022 was $14.6 million compared to $11.8 million for the second quarter of 2021. Adjusted diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2022 was $0.09 compared to $0.07 for the second quarter of 2021. Now moving to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with $194.8 million of cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30th, 2022, we had $299 million of outstanding borrowings under our term loan and full availability under our revolving credit facility. Turning to guidance, we are adjusting our full year guidance due to foreign exchange rates and slow recovery in the regulatory services market. We are lowering our revenue forecast by approximately $10 million due to foreign exchange headwinds and $15 million due to the performance and outlook of the regulatory services business. Our updated forecast for the full year of 2022 is as follows. Revenue in the range of $325 million-$335 million. Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $112 million-$117 million. Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.43-$0.48 per share. Fully diluted shares in the range of 159 million-161 million. A GAAP tax rate in the range of 40%-45% and cash tax rate in the range of 20%-25%. I would like to point out that due to capital planning, the approximate $10 million of foreign exchange headwind we have forecasted flows through to a minor impact on reported adjusted EBITDA and virtually no impact to reported adjusted EPS. Lastly, as we look towards the H2 of the year, it's worth highlighting that we have a particularly challenging third quarter comparison in reported technology-driven services revenue due to the change in outlook in regulatory services. As a result, we anticipate reported revenue growth in technology-driven services to be in the low single digits for the third quarter before returning to mid-teens growth in the fourth quarter. I will now turn the call back to our CEO, William Feehery, for closing remarks. Thank you, Andrew. In summary, we remain focused on our commitments to customers and delivering strong results for our shareholders as we continue to grow as a global leader in biosimulation. We will now open the line for questions. Operator, can you please open up the line? As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Dave Windley from Jefferies. I wanted to understand a little bit more on the regulatory services. It's been a little bit choppy for you at different times in the last year plus. I guess first question there would be what visibility, you know, what communication level and visibility do you have with your clients to, you know, kind of understand in real time what the anticipated, you know, project end dates and delivery of databases to you for your start of these projects? If you could just kind of help us understand, you know, how tight is your visibility there? Yeah. Thanks, David. It varies by client. A number, many times what we find is that, you know, the clients are still working that out themselves sometimes when they book with us. So there can be some discrepancies. But generally, you know, we have been in touch with all of our clients in our backlog, talking with them about when they expect to start the projects we currently have booked. You know, we're just sort of seeing a slowdown in some of the projects starting. That started last year, which I think is what you referred to during the pandemic, and it's continued a little bit. I would say generally, we have about 60% visibility at any given time. We said that in the past. Anything you wanna add? That just relates specifically to the reg services projects on hand. We would have firm visibility into start dates about 60%. The other 40%, we're in dialogue with the customers today. Got it. That 60% visibility on forward quarter, forward four quarters? That, that- You said that's regulatory specifically? That's regulatory specifically. That relates only to the total work available to work on. That gives us 60% visibility if it gives us basically 100% coverage to what's in the guidance here. Okay. Maybe on the product side, you mentioned Discovery Simulator, new versions of Simcyp Phoenix, enterprise version of Pinnacle 21, and then I'd also throw in you had carved out Biologics Simulator and were beginning to sell that on more of a standalone basis. I guess I'd be interested in how that Biologics Simulator is taking hold in the market, what kind of receptivity you're getting there? And then, Pinnacle 21 being a late last year acquisition, looks like it's tracking pretty well. What opportunities do you see for that to inflect a little bit? Thanks. Yeah. What you're referring to is we launched in the quarter two new products. One of them is the Simcyp Discovery Simulator, so this is targeted more towards the earlier in discovery and preclinical. Simcyp, as we said, has derived more of its revenues in the past, you know, in the clinical phase, and beyond. It's been a successful launch. We already have paying customers for that product, and it's growing nicely. To answer your question about the Biologics, it's been growing over time. The, you know, the simulator. I would say that the percentage of our customers focused on biologics has been growing pretty nicely. I don't think we've given exact numbers on that particular product. Pinnacle 21, I'll let Andy talk in a minute, but the product we launched recently was Pinnacle 21 Data Exchange. Obviously, it was in the pipeline before we bought the company, but has also reached early sales already this year, and we expect it to continue, and then as people put it in their budgets for next year, to continue to grow next year. Andy, do you wanna comment on the growth of Pinnacle 21 versus our expectations there? Pinnacle 21 is pleased to say tracking in line with our guidance from the beginning of the year. We did about $13 million year to date, $7 million in the second quarter, 95% SaaS, and we've seen you know some uptake on the new product launch there. We're feeling that that's performing well relative to our expectations. Excellent. I'll leave it at that. Thank you. Thank you, David. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Again, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Our next question comes from the line of Joy Zhang from SVB Securities. Thanks for taking my question. I want to revisit one of your comments in the prepared remarks about, you know, Chinese customers reassessing their strategy. Is that a headwind only for the regulatory business, or could that, you know, eventually become a bigger headwind in other parts of your business as well? I could start, Bill. That's specifically addressing a headwind in our regulatory business. We started to see some, we call export work, helping Chinese companies with global submissions last year. Based on some FDA feedback in the current pipeline, that work's not materializing this year, but we're continuing to add resources on the biosimulation front and believe that the opportunity to use biosimulation with regards to some of the concerns about the lack of diversity in the populations of the submissions could create some new, you know, entry points for us in discussions with clients. Got it. No, that's helpful. Maybe a question on the QSP side, I know you touched on this a little bit, but just once again, update on, you know, in terms of large molecules modeling, what is possible to do now, and what are some of the areas for future innovation? On QSP, we're building models of the action of a drug on whatever system it's targeted to interact with. Some of the work that we've been investing in in QSP and that we've been bringing in from our clients has been on things like cell and gene therapy. We recently announced a collaboration Memorial Sloan Kettering that is designed to let us build up our models for CAR T therapies. In addition, we've done a lot of work on modeling the immune system in general, and specifically, that's led to, for example, our vaccine simulator, which was used by some of the companies who launched vaccines during the pandemic. That's a little bit of a flavor for what we're doing there. Hopefully, that helps. Yeah. No, that's super helpful. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question goes to the line of Jeff Garro from Piper Sandler. Yeah, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. I want to follow up on the regulatory services outlook and just was hoping you could comment more on, you know, whether any headwinds there are being caused by capacity with the regulatory agencies themselves or just various reasons causing delays from clients. No, we're not seeing this as an issue specifically that we believe is because of regulatory agencies. Our, what we're seeing with the regulatory business, I think is a combination of several factors in our case. One is what we've talked about around we had some Chinese clients, where we were developing a business as they came to the U.S., and that's went to the FDA, and that's paused a bit this year. Second one is, we believe that some of the tier two and tier three clients have slowed down, just to conserve cash, and so they, you know, there's a slowing. The third effect, which really isn't, you know, which we did talk about, you know, in past quarters, has been that there's been, during the pandemic, a slowdown in completing studies. Generally our work doesn't begin until there's 100% database lock. We've seen just sort of a slowdown in study completion, which has kind of made a lot of the backlogs stretch out much longer than it had historically. Got it. Very helpful there. Maybe to follow up a little bit on the funding environment. You know, saw the strong bookings number in the quarter, but wanted to ask more about your business, given some of the discussion from the CROs around the kind of pros and cons of a long sales cycle and the various steps before a project gets into their backlog and is marked as a net new win. You know, just hoping you could discuss the typical length of your sales cycle and whether any elements of that have changed over the last six months. Yeah. I mean, our sales cycle tends to run a couple of quarters for most of the company. I'm not sure it's really radically different on biosimulation versus regulatory. There's some differences in software sales is that, you know, we tend to get more. Since we tend to get a lot of renewals, for example, in that business, which happened disproportionately in the first quarter, which we've disclosed in the past. I think relative to what CROs, I think my impression is, you know, what we're seeing in our regulatory business is not too dissimilar from what looks like some of the CROs are seeing. The difference there is we don't get started until the study is completely finished and there's a database lock, whereas the CRO tends to get paid, you know, throughout the entire study. I don't think that what we're reporting is radically different than some of what I've seen people talking about on the market. I will say in general though, that one thing we are seeing with our bookings is that we are seeing very strong bookings on the biosimulation side. The effects that are happening on regulatory with Chinese customers in tier two and three, and tier one and everybody else just doesn't seem to be happening in biosimulation. We're seeing, you know, pretty good customer interest in bookings across the board for both software and services in biosimulation. Yeah, we just had specifically in Q2 in terms of the bookings mix ex Pinnacle 21, we saw 2% growth on the regulatory side and 42% growth on the biosim side. You know, similar trend when I look at it on a TTM basis as well. Great. One last follow-up there. You know, it sounds very positive in terms of the client activity, the overall end market, you know, but to specifically ask, is the pipeline growing, you know, roughly in line with the bookings growth that you've printed year to date? The pipeline remains healthy, particularly on the Biosim side. On the regulatory side, you know, one of the factors in incorporating the guidance is just the lack of a, you know, major submission project, which we typically have 1 or 2 a year, and which are in the $7 million, several million dollars price range. I would say that the Biosim pipeline remains healthy and we expect, you know, continuation of strong bookings performance. With that being said, we did have two large deals that occurred last year, that were scheduled to book last year, that booked in the H1 of this year. I do anticipate pretty consistent with historical trends, a step down in the bookings in Q3 and then a return back up to Q4, which is typically our largest quarter. Great. Helpful color. Thanks again. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Again, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Again, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Dave Windley from Jefferies. weren't many questions in the queue. I'd come back in on margin. Your margin, your adjusted EBITDA margin, was lower in 2Q. I'm gonna guess that that's at least partly a function of the revenue coming in lower than you expected. Perhaps you could explain the, you know, or add some color to the impacts on your adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. Is your regulatory services business appropriately sized to what you now view as the outlook for that business? Or are there some, you know, some cost changes in that cost structure that need to happen as a result? All right, Andy, you wanna take the first part? I would say that generally speaking, the business is sized. There are some opportunities, and we're looking at those opportunities for the back half of the year. The biggest opportunity is the rate of hiring. They do have a pretty healthy backlog. The rate of hiring will be slower than historically, given the revenue growth projections for regulatory. The way that I look at the margins is on a product basis, kind of the contribution from the software and the services. We're still basically flat year-over-year on contribution there. We did see a dip in regulatory, but it was offset by higher margin elsewhere. No change. We had the mixed benefit from stronger software. The margin impact is really the lower revenues impacted by some investments at corporate. It's about a third. It's audit and SOX costs going up. It is the build-out of the commercial office, and it's the build-out of the recruiting and talent and HR team. Okay. In the H2, it looks like you're at midpoints your full-year adjusted EBITDA margin. Is it just a little bit lower, not much, but a little bit lower than what you've posted year-to-date? Should we expect, giving your comments on revenue, third quarter to look more like second quarter and then fourth quarter jumps up, or is it a little bit more even through the back half? Maybe you could help us with cadence there, please. Yes. It's a little bit more even through the back half. I'm not quite sure what you're looking at. We can talk offline, but I think I've got about 35.5% for Q3 and Q4. Got it. Okay. Could be some- Okay. That's very. Could be a little shift towards Q4. Yep. Okay. That's very helpful. Thank you. Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference back over to William Feehery for closing remarks. All right. Well, thank you everybody for joining. I would say that to summarize, what I'd see for the quarter is we have a very healthy biosimulation business. It did well in the quarter. Our bookings are strong. We're making investments as evidenced by our new products, and we're very bullish about that. Our regulatory business has, you know, grown less than we had anticipated for the factors that we talked about. We're still very supportive of that business. It has a very nice margin. It generates a significant amount of cash flow for us, and we view it as an important part of the business. You know, we have a small regulatory business in a big market and, you know, it can grow. I would now like this. Maybe biosimulation can. Overall, I think, we're excited for the future. We have a lot of good things coming for the company, and we'll look forward to talking to you all next quarter. Thank you very much. Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.