Good morning. My name is Chris, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Civitas Research fourth quarter... Excuse me, Civitas Resources fourth quarter 2022 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question during this time, simply press star, then the one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. I'm going to hand it over to John Wren, Director of Investor Relations. You may begin. Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining our conference call. Today, I'm joined by Civitas CEO, Chris Doyle; CFO, Marianella Foschi; COO, Matt Owens; and Brian Cain, our Chief Sustainability Officer. By now, I hope you've had a chance to review our earnings release, 10-K and slide deck, all of which are available on our website. On today's call, we may make forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projections. Please read our full disclosures regarding forward-looking statements in our 10-K and other SEC filings. We may also refer to certain non-GAAP financial metrics. Reconciliations to certain non-GAAP metrics can be found in our earnings release and SEC filings as well. After our brief prepared remarks, Chris and other members of the leadership team will be happy to take your questions. However, please limit your time to one question and one follow-up. Now I'll turn the call over to Chris. Thanks, John. Good morning, everyone. We have a lot of good news to share today, both in terms of our strong finish to 2022 as well as our plans for 2023. First, I want to highlight three points which are critical to understanding where we sit today and the tremendous opportunity that lies before us. Let's start with 2022. As we often discuss, our business model is based on the principle that a company in our space should prioritize free cash flow, sustainably return that cash to shareholders, maintain a premier balance sheet and lead on ESG. In 2022, we delivered across each of these strategic pillars. We met our original capital guidance for the year despite significant service cost inflation. We exceeded the top end of our production guidance and generated a record $1.2 billion in free cash flow, which is about 25% of our enterprise value. We demonstrated our commitment to returning cash to shareholders through our base and variable dividends, totaling about $530 million last year or $6.29 per share. We bought back $300 million in stock last month. We maintained our pristine balance sheet and exited the year with nearly $770 million in cash against $400 million in total debt and an undrawn facility. We continued our focus on best-in-class ESG performance, initiating an equipment retrofit program to reduce emissions by more than a third by the end of this year, and standing up the Civitas Community Foundation, a scholarship fund for high school graduates living in our operating areas in nearby communities. We talk a lot about our commitment to ESG. It's not just Civitas. We're among a truly exceptional group of North American oil and gas operators who are meeting global demand while producing among the cleanest energy molecules in the world every single day. Turning our attention to 2023, our approach this year remains consistent. We're committed to capital discipline. We're focused on generating free cash flow. We'll return that cash to our shareholders. We've seen a meaningful pullback in commodity prices lately. Service costs have yet to adjust. Utilization remains high as many operators are choosing to sacrifice margins and capital efficiency to keep programs going. Although the DJ Basin has some of the lowest break-evens in North America, I can assure you Civitas will not make that mistake. We started taking action late in the 3rd quarter of 2022 when we dropped a rig and temporarily added a 3rd completion crew to work down our DUC inventory and improve overall program efficiency. Although we have the permits in hand today to add that 3rd rig back, we're instead electing to maintain two rigs and two completion crews to maximize capital efficiency and overall program returns. For 2023, year-over-year capital investments will be down, cash returns to shareholders are projected higher, and production will be broadly flat. Let me explain how we get this done. Our capital investments will be $850 million or about 15% lower than last year. Our reinvestment rate will be below 50%. In the updated slide deck, we show cumulative production for our wells vintage by year. The company delivered a step change in performance in 2021. You can see our 2022 program delivered that same performance. We don't expect to see degradation in 2023's program. We continue to be excited with the results we're delivering in our Watkins and Lowry area. This year's turning lines will be similar to 2022. Production will be relatively flat year-over-year and exit to exit. Record cold weather in the Rockies will impact first quarter sales. We've had six weeks so far already this year with below zero wind chills, including this week. This weather has impacted our field operations. We expect volumes will be in the 155,000-160,000 BOE per day range in the first quarter versus our full year guide of 160,000-170,000 BOE per day. At current strip prices, we expect to generate roughly $1 billion in free cash this year, the majority of which will be returned to shareholders. Due to our unique and resilient return framework with payouts based on the last 12 months of free cash flow, we actually expect total dividends to increase year-over-year to more than $600 million. Our commitment to return cash to shareholders is unwavering. Yesterday, we were excited to announce a new billion-dollar buyback authorization. This is in addition to the $300 million we repurchased in January. We believe Civitas has the most compelling cash return framework in industry. Finally, I continue to be impressed with the talented Civitas team and our collective accomplishments. We strengthened our business on numerous fronts over the past year. We secured more new pad permits than any other operator in the DJ. We received approval on the state's first CAP with preliminary siting. We were disciplined in our approach to M&A, selectively executing on a couple of accretive transactions. We found innovative ways to drive capital efficiency that helped counter industry-wide inflation. I'd like to give a special shout-out to our field team. This team's executed operationally quarter after quarter. They've delivered these results safely despite record cold temperatures. I thank them, and our shareholders thank them. Before I close, I would be remiss if I didn't mention the significant contributions to our company's foundation provided by both Ben Dell and Brian Steck. Back in 2021, these two former chairmen recognized a shared vision of driving consolidation within the DJ Basin. I want to thank them for their service that proved to be so critical during our first chapter as Civitas. I'm excited to start a new chapter in our company's history and welcome Wouter van Kempen and Deborah Byers to our board. The Civitas team is just getting started, and we look forward to delivering differentiated results for our shareholders in the years ahead. Operator, we're now happy to take questions. Thank you. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. The first question is from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Your line is open. An outstanding quarter, Chris. I'm glad investors are recognizing that this morning. My first question is, you know, I guess, you know, looking at the free cash flow, or I guess I'd call it cash investment, specifically, you all recently announced a material stock buyback. I'm just wondering, was this just you all simply looking at, you know, how you I guess you assume the PV of your company value versus what you're seeing current deals or, you know, what were the other drivers or decisions part of that process? Yeah. Thanks for the question, Neal. Yeah, I think you hit on it. You know, as you know, we've been very active looking at in-basin M&A. You know, what we did last month, pulling down $300 million of our stock really is an indication that the most attractive thing we saw in front of us was buying back our own equity. As we roll our business model, which is very simple, forward through 2023 and into 2024, the $1 billion authorization's really a product of looking at the excess cash flow that this company is, and this business is gonna generate. Looking at, you know, 2022 dividends of a little over $500 million, going to $600 million this year, and $1 billion of free cash this year, roll that forward into 2024, in addition to the cash balance that we currently have. We think, hey, this could be a really good opportunity, and a really compelling investment to buy back additional shares. Yeah. I'm glad to hear that. Second question's on your operating plan that you just touched upon. Specifically, I appreciate and agree with your plan to slow activity, especially if these OFS costs remain relatively high while oil and gas decline. I'm just wondering what would it take for you to ramp this plan back up? Maybe asked another way, maybe just talk a little bit more than you already have about how you're thinking about just returning shareholder return versus growth. Sure. You know, let me start just by reiterating, we're not focused on growth, right? We're focused on keeping production as flat as we can and minimizing capital to do so to maximize free cash. What we saw, if you think back in 2022, prior to, you know, 20%+ of inflation in 2022, we actually were more aggressive. We drilled, we picked up, went to four rigs for a short period, built up a DUC inventory, and we worked that down through the year. When we look at where we are today, it's actually the opposite. Commodity prices, oil's down, call it 20%-ish. Gas is less than half of what it was just a short while ago. We're still seeing pressure given where utilization sits. I think with this environment, with the disconnect between service costs and commodity prices, I think the right thing to do is to sit back a little bit. Now, what will it take to lean back in? Those two things need to align better. That's either commodity prices up or service costs start to soften a bit. I think as you see operators pull back on activity, especially some of the gassier names, you know, we'll see that. How long will that take? We'll see. We'll be very disciplined in our approach to how we allocate capital. That's not just M&A, it's not just buybacks, it's, you know, organic investments as well. Great. Thanks for the color. Thanks, Neal. The next question is from Tim Rezvan with KeyBanc. Your line is open. Good morning, everybody. I'd like to dig into the slide eight of your deck a bit. You know, you're highlighting lack of degradation. I was just curious kind of, were these consistent results a result of specific areas you're drilling? Was it changes in the D&C design? How repeatable do you think these results are over the next few years? Yeah. Thanks for the, thanks for the question, Tim. You know, we pulled in the full year programs for everything 2020 and before, looked at just what was drilled in 2021, looked at just what was drilled in 2022. Yeah, I would say the character of each year's program is starting to shift a bit and into Watkins and the Lowry area. What we've seen is consistent results and not just what we show here, but there was a recently published report about a week and a half ago showing consistency in the Watkins area from a step change in 2020 to 2021, and then again in 2022, layover on 2021. We look at our 2023 plan, it's a laydown on 2022. We're seeing very consistent, very repeatable results. I would say that a lot of that is being driven by upspacing and optimizing returns focused on the right things, not necessarily how many sticks we can drill a year, but how do we maximize those returns for the company and maximize free cash flow. Okay. Okay. That's helpful. If I could pivot back to the repurchase discussion. I know there's some folks who've argued that having an open-ended repurchase that's not, you know, being actively utilized is not helpful. Do you believe that is it your intent in a, in a steady state world to kind of fully utilize this $1 billion over the next two years? Do you have a preference over open market repurchases versus sort of negotiated repurchases like you did with CPPIB? Sure. I'll kick us off and then maybe kick it to Nella to add some color. Yes, our intent with the authorization is to purchase $1 billion by the end of next year. How we do that, I think everything is on the table. I would tell you one thing that this team has shown time and time again, and the company has shown time and time again, is we're going to be disciplined, and we're going to attack whatever it is, if it's a buyback, to maximize returns for our company. What we saw in January, again, was an opportunity to pull down a pretty significant chunk from one of our larger shareholders, not impact the overall flow to the equity and do so at a really compelling price. What that looks like over the next couple of years is yet to be determined, but everything is on the table. Tim, I would add, I mean, to Chris's point, any and all options are open. I I mean, the way we think about it's just really the incremental dollar, like where the return on that incremental dollar is. I mean, open market repurchases are just more spread out. You can't do them as chunky. If you look at something negotiated like we announced in January, that one is more chunky. You know, you saw sort of the last year evaluate. You know, we did a couple of relatively small deals, one in January, one in July. You know, at those points, we determined that those asset acquisitions were better than our stock. In January, we determined our stock was very compelling. You know, it's just a continuous evaluation of the relative merits of our stock and in additional asset acquisitions. We always, you know, every time we do those evaluations, we look at the value proposition in our stock, and it's a continuous evaluation. It's hard to say, you know, pace or anything format, right? I mean, it's gonna depend on the situation and what the best return is at the time. We'll be very opportunistic. Okay. I look forward to seeing what happens. Thank you. Great. Thanks. The next question is from Phillips Johnston with Capital One. Your line is open. Hey, guys. Thank you. just to ask about the setup for 2024. Obviously, it's early to be talking about next year, and obviously, there's no guidance out there or anything like that. It is pretty notable that you guys are gonna be bringing about 40 more wells online this year than the number of wells that you're drilling with the two-rig program. You know, I agree with the rationale, if services costs do remain high, I'm wondering if we're at risk of robbing Peter to pay Paul and essentially pulling some free cash flow from 2024 forward by a year since, you know, you would presumably need to ramp up drilling activity to sort of keep the same till pace. Yeah. Thanks for the question, Phillips. You know, I'll step back for a second and just make the point that no company should be building up DUCs. No company should have hundreds of DUCs, in my opinion. That's, that's inefficient use of capital. What we saw last year was we entered the year with about 40 DUCs. We exited with about 60, and so we're working that down in 2023 because it's the best use of capital. As I look from 2023 into 2024, while there's no guidance there, the guidance is the business model. The business model is we're gonna keep production broadly flat. If that's 160, 170, that's fine. Now how we get there, to your point, depends very highly on service costs. Now, in my opinion, why would service costs remain high? I think because commodity prices will deem the utilization to remain high. In that case, we would lean into that. I think the simplicity of our business model, focusing on all the right things, trying to be as efficient every year as possible, is not gonna waver this year, next year, or over the foreseeable future. Matt, I don't know if there's anything you would add in terms of how we think about capital allocation or not. No, nothing for me. I would echo that we're not drawing down a significant number of DUCs. Like Chris said, we did enter the year with about 40 or the previous year, going into 2023, we have about 60. It wasn't like we built up a massive number, and that's what we're focusing on going forward. We should always be kind of normalized right around that 40-ish number, depending on just the ebb and flow of the rig schedule. Okay, sounds good. That's good color. Maybe just to follow up on Neal's question on the M&A front. You know, you guys haven't been shy about your efforts to acquire some of the larger privates in the basin. Can you maybe just give us an update there? And should we assume that the more aggressive return of capital plans means that M&A is less of a priority going forward? Yeah, I wouldn't say that, Phillips. I appreciate the question. I think it's an indication that all along, anything that we do in terms of M&A has to compete against our underlying business. We've been very active, as we said, on the M&A side. The most compelling thing we've seen currently is our own equity. That's a tribute to the strength of the business model and the opportunities versus the opportunities that are out there. I would say we will remain active and look for ways, big or small, to continue to optimize our underlying business model, which is how do you generate the most cash that you can, get it back to shareholders, without putting your balance sheet at risk, and lead on ESG. We'll remain active. It's really just a commitment to investors to say, "Look, this is... we're not committed one way or the other. Everything has to compete on a level playing field. Great. Thanks, guys. Thank you. The next question is from Noel Parks with Tuohy Brothers. Your line is open. Hi, good morning. Morning. Just a couple for me. In the release, you talked about setting a record for the your drill time on a 2.5 mile lateral. I'm just curious if you could talk about that. I assume that record will still not be the will not be the average or typical in the near term. I was just sort of curious of the elements of that improvement, and I think it was described as being your highest performing rig. I was just wondering how much of that was maybe sort of crew dependent as well as just, you know, process consistency? Yeah, thank you for the question. I'll kick us off and then kick it over to Matt. It's Matt's team that is delivering that type of continuous improvement. I think what I would highlight for us is not just the record. The thing that jumps off the slide for me is a 30%+ improvement over 2017, a 16% improvement over 2019. A team that is geared to continuously improve and drive cost, time, cycle times out of a system is that's how you win in a commodity business. I would say the other thing is that this highlights the underlying capital efficiency of a DJ asset. Industry, and it's not just us, has gotten this down to a fine art. We continue to look for ways and find ways to get cost and time out of the, out of the system. Your last point is a good one. You know, there are, it's beyond just the rig. It's the crew in the field. It's the team helping those crews. What we've seen is while we highlight the highest performing rig, we're very happy with performance of all our rigs. You know, the last thing I would point out, too, is to have that type of performance for an entire year with no lost time incidences is what we can be most proud of. Matt, anything to add from you? Yeah, I'd just add, this was the only rig that we ran for the full year last year. Our second rig that we were running all of last year, the second two quarters anyways, we picked up halfway through the year, and it's not far behind what this rig was in terms of pace. Our average 2.5 mile well isn't 2.2 days spud to TD, but the averages have been coming down, and you can see that in that bullet point Chris referenced earlier in the improvement over the prior years. Our goal is to, you know, continue bringing down that average closer and closer to what our records are. Again, if you were to rewind two years and asked if we thought we'd be drilling a two and a half mile well, almost 21,000 ft spud to TD in 2.2 days, I would have thought that would've been a little bit out of reach. You know, we keep finding new ways to innovate and get things done a little bit quicker and a little bit quicker each year. Great. Just wanted to ask about reserves and, wondering if you could talk a bit about maybe whether you saw positive type curve revisions. I'm assuming that with the five-year rule, not all of those would necessarily be immediately visible in the proved numbers. You know, if you have any sense of, you know, what kind of improvement you might be able to see going forward? Yeah, good question. This is Matt again. I'm assuming you're referring to the roughly $25 million barrels equivalent of revisions that is showing up in the 10-K. If you're looking at that, about half of that is due to price, and of the other half, roughly, is due to well performance. We have seen positive well performance compared to what type curves were generated off of a few years ago. A lot of that has to do with what Chris alluded to earlier in our, you know, repeatable well results year-over-year due to different completion designs that we think are attributing to our outperformance, but also up spacing. We've generally up-spaced across the board, and we're seeing positive results and consistent results from that over the 1.5 years. Great. Thanks a lot. Thank you. Thanks. The next question is from Nicholas Pope with Seaport Research. Your line is open. Morning, everyone. Morning. I was hoping you could expand a little bit on these big wells that you're drilling, 'cause I see that the guidance for 2023, you're talking about average lateral lengths are gonna be two and a half miles. I guess, how has that progressed over the last year in terms of maybe the last two years, as you kinda look at the size of the wells you're drilling and kind of how sustainable that is to kinda keep with those bigger, longer wells? Yeah, no, thank you for highlighting that. That's a big move year-over-year, drilling two-milers on average versus 2.5 miles now. We're testing longer laterals. We're very excited about what the team's been able to do in terms of cycle times and being able to extend laterals. It really is just another ingredient to drive additional capital efficiency into the program. Looking into 2024, that generally longer lateral mix of wells is, again, how we will most efficiently keep production broadly flat. Matt, I don't know if you wanna add anything, any other details? Yeah, I would add our acreage position is different now too, especially in Watkins, where it's nearly a 80,000 acre contiguous block where we can drill these longer laterals. Down in that area, you'll see us drilling a lot more three-mile wells. We drilled quite a few three-mile wells last year, completed them, brought them online, and we have the ability to even do four-mile wells now going forward. We anticipate efficiencies to get better with these longer laterals, but the one thing you gotta remember that's different about the DJ Basin compared to other basins is we can drill the wells so fast, so the vertical section doesn't save us millions of dollars like it does in other basins. It only saves us about $1 million to not have to drill that vertical section. It's not quite as efficient as some other basins where drilling costs are a lot more expensive, but it is, we still think, gonna be more efficiencies going forward that we can continue to capitalize on. Got it. That's great. and to kinda switch gear a little bit here, kinda curious if you could update, thoughts on the permitting process. I know there's a small piece of 2023 that's still kind of outstanding to kinda lock up permitting. Can you give a little update on where things are and kind of where the expectation is on kinda updates on kinda finalizing everything with 2023? Sure. I appreciate the question. I'll kick us off and then kick it over to Brian Cain. As you highlight, we're about 85% of the way through for the 2023 program. I would just on the backs of the hard work of the team highlight how much different a place we are this year than we were a year ago. And that's again, lots of hard work and collaboration with multiple groups. You know, at the tail end of last year, you saw our first, actually the first CAP get approved with preliminary siting. One of our peer companies in Basin followed us. We're seeing the process work and certainly a much different pace than what we saw this time last year. We're focused with that CAP, and you also saw us submit our second CAP. You know, we're talking about 2024, 2025 activity. The team is getting out in front of the rigs, which is exactly what we wanna see and continue to work very well with the COGCC. Let me kick it to Cain, and he'll give you some additional details. Thanks, Chris. You know, as you said, 85% of our 2023 plan is permitted. You know, we have enough permits right now to run 3 rigs if we wanted to. Obviously choosing not to. Those 2 pads essentially left in the 2023 plan are currently pending. Those are November, December pads, and we believe that they are worth the wait because of the value that we assign to those. We feel good about our 2023 plan. I would just point out that, you know, we ended 2022, as you see, with 9 new pad permits, which is more than any other operator in the basin by nearly 2x. We're creating a demonstrated track record of success in navigating this regulatory environment with we think exceptional results. I would also note that by the end of the first quarter, by the end of this quarter, we will have as many OGDP permits, that's new pad permits, pending as we received in the entirety of last year. Those new pad permits that will be pending would be going toward the 2024 drilling program. Longer term, we'd like to have a bank of about 12-18 months of permits in hand to provide that maximum flexibility and value acceleration, where desired in our development plans. This year, we're laser focused on working toward that goal. And we'll be augmenting that through the pads associated with our approved Boxelder CAP. Our next CAP, the Lowry CAP, which is a very exciting development, about 170 wells nameplate, one surface owner and no dissenting owners within 2,000 feet. We remain laser focused in building that bank this year for coming years. Got it. That's very detailed, very helpful. I appreciate that. I'd also like to add the, I like this slide on the greenhouse gas emissions reduction, that target you guys have for 2023. I mean, that's a nice big number. I like to see that. That's all I have. Thanks. Yep. No, I appreciate the question. Appreciate the comment. Certainly that's a massive commitment for the company, and we think it's the right thing to do, and excited to see what the team can do throughout the year. That's star one if you'd like to ask a question. The next question is from Bill Dezellem with Tieton Capital. Your line is open. Thank you, and congratulations on a good quarter and year. How are you thinking about moving outside of Colorado over the course of the next couple years? Sure. So I think I would take us back to our four pillars really of how we're gonna run this business. We have an asset that generates significant free cash. We have returned significant cash to shareholders. We're protecting our balance sheet, and we're leading the way in ESG. I say that because that grounds us to opportunities as we look outside of the DJ perhaps. Has to be assets that allows us to extend or optimize that business model. You're talking about asset quality, you're talking about entry into that asset is important as well. Again, as we look at options to deploy capital, will we consider adding assets in base ensure, out of basin perhaps. We have a fundamentally really strong business going here right now. It's gonna take quite a bit to have us consider those opportunities. We've proven ourself as having a very disciplined approach to M&A and we'll continue down that path. Marianella, I don't know if you wanna add anything to that? I think that's right. I think with this latest buybacks announcement, you know, you saw us over the last 12 months execute on opportunities to compete with that. I think with this latest buyback announcement, we're making a very clear signal that everything that we do has to compete with our stock. That's what you saw us do in January, and that's what you'll see us do pursuant to execution of this new, newly announced billion-dollar program. Thank you both. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks. There are no further questions at this time. I'll turn it over to Chris Doyle for any closing remarks. Sure. Thank you. I appreciate everyone's continued interest in Civitas. You know, I'm looking out, looking at the temperature, we're below zero again, so I really appreciate the hard work of all of the Civitas employees, especially the field, the field operations group, that is making this a super compelling investment and super compelling business. Thank you so much for the time this morning, and look forward to speaking soon. Be safe. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.