Greetings, welcome to the Columbus McKinnon Corporation third quarter fiscal year 2023 financial results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Deborah Pawlowski, Investor Relations for CMCO. Thank you, Ms. Pawlowski. Please go ahead. Thank you, Donna. Good morning, everyone. We certainly appreciate your time today and your interest in Columbus McKinnon. Joining me here for the quarterly conference call are David Wilson, our President and CEO, and Greg Rustowicz, our Chief Financial Officer. You should have a copy of the third quarter fiscal 2023 financial results, which we released earlier this morning, and if not, you can access the release as well as the slides that will accompany our conversation today on our website at investors.columbusmckinnon.com. David and Greg will provide their formal remarks, after which we will open the line for questions. If you would turn to slide 2 in the deck, I'll review the Safe Harbor statement. You should be aware that we may make some forward-looking statements during the formal discussions as well as during the Q&A session. These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties as well as other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated here today. These risks and uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release as well as other documents filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can find those documents on our website or at sec.gov. During today's call, we will also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these will be useful in evaluating our performance. However, you should not consider the presentation of this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have provided reconciliation of non-GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today's release and slides. With that, please advance to slide 3, and I'll turn the call over to David to begin. Thanks, Deb, and good morning, everyone. Our results for the quarter demonstrate the steady progress we're making as we execute our plan to transform Columbus McKinnon into a higher margin, higher growth business. There were several highlights in the quarter. Sales were up 11% on a constant currency basis as we captured price, increased volume to meet demand, and the team successfully reduced past due backlog. Past due backlog was reduced by $16 million or 28% as we continued efforts to improve our customers' experience. We expanded operating margins by 170 basis points on a GAAP basis and 70 basis points on an adjusted basis. Q3 daily order rates increased 3% sequentially, and order rates in January through last Friday are up nearly 6%. Finally, we are seeing project activity that had stalled in Q3 begin to advance this month. We remain bullish on megatrends that we expect will continue to drive opportunities for us even against the softening economic backdrop. Global shifts, or I should say geopolitical shifts, transportation and logistics challenges, insufficient supply, and the limitations of available labor are driving investment decisions that support automation, the reshoring of manufacturing, facility upgrades, and expanded operational investment. We continue to strengthen our balance sheet and improve our financial flexibility to execute our strategy. We paid down $30 million in debt through the first 9 months of our fiscal year and have brought our net debt leverage ratio to 2.7x. We also repurchased approximately 31,000 shares at an average price of $32.17 in the quarter. On slide 4, I will update you on our strategic progress. As mentioned earlier, growth in the quarter on a constant currency basis was 11%. I believe our new regional leadership team structure contributed to this success. In fact, sales in EMEA were up nearly 12%, excluding the impact of FX, driven by both price and volume. We also continue to innovate to drive growth, we introduced 3 new products in the quarter. A new medium-duty belted conveyor that fills the gap between our current flagship products in capacity and capabilities. The new line includes many features that provide competitive advantages, including flow accuracy, tracking, and a slim profile. A new 4.5 ton hand chain hoist for the general industrial markets. We pre-launched a next generation wire rope hoist with available frequency drive controlled motion for better speed and position control. This solution offers an easy upgrade path to a digitally connected footprint for diagnostics and remote monitoring. Our NPD N-3 revenue, which we use to measure vitality, was 5% of total revenue on a year-to-date basis and remains ahead of plan. Our most immediate opportunity is improving our customer experience in North America to gain market share and to grow our customer base. We have improved our performance relative to internal customer service metrics, including call wait times, quotation lead times, order entry times, engineer drawing lead times, lead time accuracy, delivery status update accuracy, and past due backlog reduction. We are laser focused on reducing delivery lead times and have created plans for each product that will reduce lead times to competitively advantaged levels. While we are making progress on these initiatives, we are not yet satisfied with the results. I should also mention that in December, we successfully launched and went live with our new ERP system in Mexico. This is consistent with our digital initiatives roadmap and is expected to improve efficiency and enable our teams to be more effective as they address both internal and external customer needs. This also provides the foundation for future enterprise simplification efforts. Despite supply chain headwinds and related production impacts, we continue to expand margins. We have now extracted $7.2 million in annualized costs through the business realignment efforts we initiated earlier this fiscal year. We have realized $4.7 million of these savings in fiscal year 2023 and expect the balance to help offset further inflationary pressures in fiscal 2024. Rest assured, we're also taking actions to identify additional costs that we can take action on in fiscal 2024. We generated $6.5 million in free cash flow in the quarter and are expecting a significant increase in cash from operations in the fourth quarter as we reduce inventory and improve working capital. Slide 5 depicts our adjusted gross margin progression over the last several years. Since fiscal 18, we have improved gross margin by 310 basis points, and we believe we are on track to achieve our fiscal 27 objectives. As you can see on this slide, there are several levers we will address to achieve our targeted level of approximately 40%. I wanna remind you on slide 6 of where we're heading and why. We're transforming Columbus McKinnon into a leading motion control enterprise for material handling by leveraging our product portfolio and expanding into secular growth markets. We expect our strategy to shift our mix of business into our product platforms that command higher margins and have greater growth potential. By organizing around these platforms, we are also identifying larger addressable markets, creating more opportunities for us to grow and succeed. With that, let me turn the call over to Greg to discuss our financial results in greater detail. Greg? Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone. On slide 7, net sales in the third quarter were $230.4 million, up 10.5% from the prior year period on a constant currency basis and above the midpoint of the guidance we provided last quarter. As you know, the third quarter is impacted the most from a seasonality perspective, as we had 4 less workdays in most geographies around the world compared with the previous quarter. Overall, we are pleased that we were able to reduce past due backlog by $16 million, despite persistent supply chain challenges for motors, drives, and other components that we purchase. We also had delays in certain rail projects for various reasons that impacted revenue by about $4 million in Q3. This revenue is expected to be recognized in Q4. Looking at our sales bridge, pricing gains of $11.9 million or 5.5% accelerated as we converted orders to revenue at more current prices. This was up 60 basis points from our Q2 level. Volume increased by 2.7% or $5.9 million, which we will cover in the regional update. Acquisition revenue represents 2 months of sales from the Garvey acquisition, which closed on December 1st of 2021. This provided $4.9 million of incremental growth in the quarter. Foreign currency translation reduced sales by $8.4 million or 3.9% of sales. Let me provide a little color on sales by region. For the 3rd quarter, the 9.9% growth we saw in the U.S. was driven by a 5.8% improvement in pricing. Acquired revenue from Garvey added 3.5% growth in the U.S. Sales volume was up 0.6%. Outside of the U.S., sales grew 11.4% on a constant currency basis. Pricing improved by 5.1%, and sales volume increased by 5.9%. We were encouraged with the volume increases we saw, which were approximately 12% in Latin America, 9% in Asia, 5% in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, or EMEA, and 3% in Canada. We are especially encouraged by the volume gains in EMEA, which represents 25% of our business. The region is proving to be resilient in the face of the war in the Ukraine and an energy crisis. Both our project business and short cycle business in Europe saw meaningful volume growth. On slide 8, gross margin of 35.6% was up 90 basis points from the prior year. On an adjusted basis, gross margin was lower by 110 basis points compared with the prior year. Last year's third quarter was unusually strong as we didn't see our typical seasonal dip of roughly 100 basis points in gross margin. In the prior year, we benefited from a strong month from the Garvey acquisition as they delivered an exceptionally strong margin on a large project they shipped right after we acquired them. This quarter, we saw a more normal sequential dip in margins. Third quarter gross profit increased $6.9 million compared with the prior year and was driven by several factors which you can see in the table. Let me comment on a few highlights on our gross profit bridge. Pricing net of material inflation added $5.9 million of gross profit, which includes $6 million of material inflation in the quarter. We see material inflation decelerating as we enter Q4. We also had an unusual product liability settlement last year that did not repeat. The two incremental months in the quarter from the Garvey acquisition provided $1.9 million of gross profit on $4.9 million of revenue. Offsetting these items was foreign currency translation, which reduced gross profit by $2.8 million and lower factory productivity compared with the prior year of $3.7 million. The lower factory productivity was primarily at our Künzelsau facility as volume picked up for engineer-to-order production activity as our mix shifted to more ETO product, which is more complex than standard product. This disrupted our planning and execution processes. This is being addressed as we add a new planning tool to increase the efficiency of this process. Moving to slide 9, our SG&A expense was $55.4 million in the quarter, or 24.1% of sales. This includes a purchase accounting item for $1.2 million related to contingent consideration paid to the owners of Garvey. The acquisition was structured with an earn-out provision based on delivering certain levels of EBITDA in the first year, which was achieved this quarter. The $1.2 million represents the excess of what was estimated during purchase accounting. The total earn-out of $2 million was placed in escrow when the deal closed. There will not be a cash impact when it is paid in Q1 of next fiscal year. In addition, the sequential increase in our SG&A included $500,000 of incremental business realignment and headquarters relocation costs. The remainder of the sequential increase was due to adjustments to our annual incentive plan accruals and stock compensation. Compared with the prior year, our SG&A costs were higher by $1.9 million, which includes the $1.2 million of contingent consideration for the Garvey acquisition, which I just discussed. We also incurred $1.1 million of incremental business realignment costs related to our commercial reorganization, and the incremental 2 months of the Garvey acquisition added $900,000 to our SG&A costs as well. Offsetting these increases were foreign currency translation, which reduced our costs by $1.8 million. For the fiscal fourth quarter, we expect our SG&A expense to approximate $54 million. We are assessing further cost reduction opportunities as we plan for fiscal 2024. Turning to slide 10, operating income in the quarter increased 32% to $20.2 million, and adjusted operating income was $23.5 million. Operating margin expanded 170 basis points, reflecting pricing, acquisition performance, and higher volumes. Adjusted operating margin was 10.2% of sales, a 70 basis point increase over the prior year. As you can see on Slide 11, we recorded GAAP earnings per diluted share for the quarter of $0.42, up $0.08 versus the prior year. Our tax rate on a GAAP basis was 28% in the quarter. For the full year, the tax rate is expected to be between 30% and 32%, which reflects a 6 percentage point impact from the two discrete items that we discussed in our Q1 earnings call. Adjusted earnings per diluted share of $0.72 was up $0.12 from the prior year. While EPS was negatively impacted by $0.08 per share from higher interest expense versus the prior year, we had a favorable impact from FX gains as well as mark-to-market investment gains, which together favorably impacted EPS by $0.12 per share year-over-year. Even though we are 60% hedged to interest rate exposure, interest expense is expected to increase to $7.6 million in the fourth quarter. Weighted average diluted shares outstanding will approximate 29 million, and our pro forma tax rate is 22% for calculating non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share. On slide 12, our trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA margin is 15.7%. We are making steady progress towards our target of $1.5 billion in revenue with a 21% EBITDA margin in fiscal 2027. Our return on invested capital of 6.9% was impacted by the Garvey acquisition. ROIC is a key metric in our long-term incentive plan, and we expect to see this improve over time. We continue to advance our efforts to reduce overhead, improve productivity, and simplify both our product lines and factories. We will also drive the top line as well. These are the key elements to delivering on our growth and profit goals. Moving to slide 13, we had positive free cash flow of $6.5 million in the third quarter. This includes cash inflows from operating activities of $10.8 million and CapEx of $4.2 million. Third quarter cash flow was impacted by approximately $15 million of higher cash interest and cash tax payments compared to the prior year. As we turn to the fiscal fourth quarter, we expect strong free cash flow as we drive earnings and reduce working capital investments. Full year capital expenditures are expected to be in a range of $13 million-$15 million, or between $3.5 million-$5.5 million of CapEx in the fourth quarter. Turning to slide 14, we have a strong and flexible capital structure comprised of a Term Loan B, which requires $5.3 million of annual principal payments as well as an excess cash flow sweep, depending on our total leverage ratio. We have been actively paying down our borrowings and made another $10 million payment in the quarter, bringing the total debt payments year to date to $30 million. We expect to pay an additional $10 million in the fourth quarter. The Term Loan B is 60% hedged with interest rate swaps that blend to a swap rate of approximately 2.08%. As of December 31st, our net debt leverage ratio was 2.7x. We have prioritized debt repayment in the current environment and expect to see our leverage ratio drop to under 2.5x next quarter. As David noted, we took advantage of market conditions to repurchase about $1 million of stock in the quarter. Our liquidity, which includes our cash on hand and revolver availability, remains strong and was approximately $166 million at the end of December. Please advance to slide 15, I will turn it back over to David. Thanks, Greg. As I mentioned earlier, daily order rates improved 3% sequentially in Q3. On a year-over-year basis, there were two major impacts that affected our Q3 order levels. First, FX had a $9 million negative impact in the period. Additionally, there was a $9 million impact to orders resulting from the curtailment in new warehouse investment by a large e-commerce customer. Year to date, orders for this customer are down approximately $25 million. While current order activity with this customer is paused, we are highly engaged with them on other promising and innovative new projects. I should also highlight that we're excited about additional e-commerce applications that we are winning. We are working with several integrators that are serving end users who are looking for increased production efficiencies within their intralogistics systems. Our backlog remains stable at $329 million in the quarter, was more current given the 28% reduction in past two orders we achieved in the period. Let me wrap up on slide 16 with some thoughts regarding our outlook. First, looking to the fourth quarter, we expect to deliver quarterly revenue of about $240 million-$250 million. This implies fiscal 2023 growth of 6% for the full year on a constant currency basis, which is in line with our strategic plan. As I mentioned earlier, we are planning for a measurable improvement in cash generation in the quarter through a reduction in working capital. We are encouraged with the developing view of fiscal 2024 as well. We anticipate that we can deliver growth on the order of low to mid-single digits for the year. While quotation to order conversion timing has been extended, customer activity and quotation levels have held up well, and we are not seeing indications of an industrial recession. We also think that a stabilizing environment will help advance projects that have been held up in decision-making processes. There's actually quite a lot of activity in a number of our markets. For example, we see continued strength in the EV market, whether it be for vehicle or battery production. Energy and utilities around the world are also very active, from water treatment, wastewater management, and waste-to-energy power facilities, to active oil production in the Middle East. Utilities are adding new plants and upgrading older facilities to drive improved efficiencies. Defense has also been active with missile elevation devices and chain hoists to erect mobile tents. In life sciences, we're providing automated pharmaceutical packaging and delivery systems for prescription fulfillment. Finally, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that demand for our entertainment solutions continues to be solid. We are hyper-focused on improving our customers' experience and are executing plans to do so. This will enable improved market share and expanding addressable markets. As we look beyond fiscal 2023, given the activity we're seeing in our markets, our efforts to improve customer experience and our strong backlog, we expect to continue to grow even as the economy moderates. We are committed to achieving our longer-term goals and expect to deliver additional steady proof points as we advance. Donna, with that, I'll open up the call for questions. Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad at this time. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Once again, that's star one to register a question at this time. The first question is coming from Matt Summerville of D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. This is Will Jellison on for Matthew Summerville today. Hi, Will. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. The first thing that I was curious about is, as we head into fiscal year 2024, I was curious about how you're thinking about pricing entering that year, considering that in fiscal 2023 to date, it's been especially strong. I'm curious as to how you're approaching that equation as we head into the next periods here. Okay. Yeah, thanks, Will. Obviously, we've made a lot of pricing moves over the past 12 months as we've managed through inflation and tried to stay positive as it relates to price cost. As we look into the new year and as we think about our bridge looking at this year versus next year, we're thinking there might be another 3%-4% that might translate as we look at where inflation rates might be, our cost position, and where we think we've got leverage with our portfolio. Understood. Okay. Greg, I had a follow-up question from you from prepared remarks. It sounded like during the quarter, if I interpreted correctly, you were able to actually net recover some of the sales that had been pushed out in prior periods as a result of supply chain. I was just curious if we could get a bit better understanding about what enabled that. Yeah. Will, what we actually saw was that supply chain constraints were about at the same level. It was better in certain component categories and worse than others. Net-net, we still had roughly a $24 million impact, which I think was maybe $1 million better than it was in the second fiscal quarter. Was there something else in the prepared remarks that led you to a different conclusion? No, I was just interpreting the comment of the $16 million. Past due backlog reduction. Oh, yeah. That's right. Will, this is David. I'll jump in a little bit. Yeah, we did reduce past due backlog by about $16 million sequentially in the quarter. That was a 28% reduction in total past due backlog. We're able to make progress as it related to, you know, supply chain delays as it relates to those particular items. Our backlog is becoming more current. Greg's comment related to opportunities to even do better than what we did g iven, you know, the items that were left on the dock, if you will. We are continuing to make progress there, and I think we are seeing some loosening in the supply chain. There are spot challenges that we're addressing every single hour. You know, we are making progress there and expect to continue to make progress as we head through this quarter. Understood. Thank you for that clarification. Great. Thanks, Will. Thank you. The next question is coming from Steve Ferazani of Sidoti & Company. Please go ahead. Morning, David. Morning, Greg. Appreciate all the info on the call this morning. A couple of things I wanna check in on. Greg, you explained a little bit that the year-over-year gross margin decline, I think you owed it to a big Garvey order at the end of four Q a year ago. I'm just trying to make sure that's, you know, most of the change, particularly because your revenue was essentially flat sequentially, but we saw the gross margin decline. I'm just trying to get a sense of gross margin trends. Great question. Thanks for that, Steve. A year ago, our gross margins were, I believe, 37.2% in the quarter, and they actually were the same level as they were in the fiscal second quarter. We didn't see our historical drop. What I was mentioning is that a large driver of why we didn't see our historical 100 basis point drop that we would typically see because of less workdays, is that we owned Garvey for one month, but they had a tremendous month of December with some meaningful revenue to one large customer that had almost 60% gross margin. It was a very, very accretive, and that's why we didn't see the typical drop. Now, this year we saw a drop, a little bit more than 100 basis points. I believe it was 160 basis points from Q2. What I talked about on the call was that we actually, you know, about 100 of that we would normally expect with just less working days. You know, there were only 60 working days versus 64 in the September quarter. In addition, we did have lower productivity, which you see in our bridge, largely driven by our Künzelsau factory, which is our largest, most complex, most highly engineered factory. We've had a, we've seen more of a mix shift where we have more engineer-to-order product and less standard product, which is more complex, takes more time. Also we had, you know, issues just with the planning of these large projects. That impacted us as well in the quarter. We are, Steve, introducing a solution for that challenge as we speak, and are going live with a new production planning module for that facility that augments or supplements what we have in place today with our SAP solution to take that to a next level. We expect to see benefits for that that will phase in in our Q1 of next year time period. You know, as we think about our Q4 gross margin, Steve, you know, we would expect normally around a 37% gross margin. We're kind of, you know, at, in that ZIP code, especially with the additional workdays. However, we are gonna see roughly an 80 basis point mix, negative mix impact from some rail projects that are going to ship in the quarter. Our rail business has typically, it's about a $10 million of revenue, and it typically is, you know, gross margins are much lower than the overall corporate average. That is gonna have about an 80 basis point, 80-100 basis point impact. Steve, those are projects that have been. So I believe. Sorry, Steve. Those are projects that have been delayed given those supply chain issues we've talked about. There's been some pricing impacts, cost impacts that are phasing through on those. A lot of electrical component price adjustments and controls. That's the impact of the lower margins. Typical volume in that business in a quarter is about 3x less than what we're shipping. That drives this mix shift, and the margin impact Greg's talking about 80 basis points. When we think about this moving forward, even past this quarter, you know, generally, mix shift has been helping you because Dorner and Garvey have been growing at a faster rate and are higher margin. You mentioned the e-commerce customer. How are you thinking about mix shift over the next multiple quarters in terms of what you're seeing from orders, et cetera? Yeah. Steve, we think we can continue to drive accretive margins in the business over the mid to long term. We have this issue that Greg just referred to in the period, which is driven by the shipment of this very large volume of legacy, you know, orders that we need to get through the system. We anticipate that the volume increases we would expect to see continuing to come from those faster-growing segments, as well as our own work around 80/20 and productivity improvements driven by a more stable and an improving supply chain will allow us to drive expanding margins. Thanks, David. Thanks, Greg. Great. Thanks, Steve. Thanks, Steve. Thank you. The next question is coming from Jon Tanwanteng of CJS Securities. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. David, I was wondering if you could just comment a little bit more on the visibility you have in the rest of 2024. Are you actively planning for a soft landing at this point or something different? Are there any places you expect, you know, any significant weakening from here, or does your crystal ball tell you that things are gonna stay pretty healthy at this point? Right. Now we have a pretty good bead on you know, certain current activity. As we look to the quotation and customer discussion activity, we see no signs of an industrial recession as we were talking about earlier in the prepared remarks. Obviously, our crystal ball doesn't go out y ears and years, obviously things can change. At this point, we're planning on a relatively soft landing in the way that we're thinking about the way the year develops. If there is an impact, it's an impact that would come later in our period. We're anticipating that we can deliver low to mid-single digit growth next year given the current environment, the activity we're seeing in the marketplace, our improvement initiatives around share gains and customer additions, as well as the backlog that we have, which is still pretty robust. Yeah, just to add on, Jon, we typically lag by a quarter or so, and as David mentioned, you know, our backlog is very healthy currently, and that will, I think, buffer us even if there is a bit of a slowdown or recession later in our fiscal year. Got it. No, that's very helpful and encouraging to hear. Greg, I think I got the message on the longer-term margins and, Dave, from what you said, expanding. Could you give me directional thoughts on gross margins in the current quarter? I know it's usually a little bit better if you just on volume. Are there any other plus or takes that we should be? Yeah. Hey, Jon, that was really what we talked about with Steve a few minutes ago, where, you know, normally we'd expect roughly the 37% gross margins roughly in the fourth quarter. You know, they'd be expanded from our current levels, we're gonna have this negative mix impact from our rail business that we think is roughly about an 80 basis point negative impact. My apologies. That was the past quarter. I got it. Okay. Last of all, just in terms of the cash flow that you're expecting to generate in the near future, I assume that's working capital improvement. Is supply improving to the point where you can do that, or is there something else that we should be thinking about? Yeah. No, it is. It's largely gonna be driven by working capital improvement. You know, as you know, we're carrying almost $32 million more inventory than we started the year with, and we've been working on this, and we expect to see, you know, meaningful improvement in our working capital utilization in the fourth quarter, and we'll see a really strong free cash flow time frame for us. Got it. Thank you very much, guys. Thanks, Jon. Thank you. The next question is coming from Walter Liptak of Seaport Research. Please go ahead. Hey, thank you. Good morning, guys. just wanted to follow up on the productivity system that you're putting in the ERP. Has that started going in? I just wanna get an idea of, you know, what the size of that manufacturing location, you know, maybe as a% of square footage or whatever. You know, are you expecting or could we see some disruptions, you know, similar to what we saw with that Europe ERP ramp? No. No. Well, we have a 600 person, roughly, manufacturing facility over in Künzelsau, Germany. It's our largest manufacturing facility. We, it's the STAHL acquisition effectively. We implemented SAP, went live, had good success in the wake of that implementation as we continued to ramp volume. The mix shift that Greg referenced to a more engineer-to-order balance of production had an impact on planning activities, you know, somewhat impacted by supply chain challenges as well. That created a level of disruption in the period that led to productivity losses. We are implementing a, you know, an adjustment to the planning module for that system. It's an additional tool that we're confident will enable our ETO, highly complex ETO business to have a much more efficient planning and execution process and don't anticipate that it'll have a disruptive impact on the business. We're implementing that as we speak, and that'll continue into the first quarter of next fiscal year when we'll start to see some benefits begin to be realized. Okay, great. Greg, during the, thanks for that, David. You talked about that $3.7 million productivity issue. I'm sorry, could you just provide the details of that again? Yeah. The negative productivity is largely due to this issue that we're talking about with the mix shift at our Künzelsau factory. Remember, the Stahl business is the highly engineered explosion-protected products, and they have very, very complex BOMs that are much more than SAP can handle. We have to add an additional system onto it that will help us from a planning perspective, and it really will improve our production planning as well as improve our capacity utilization, which is really where the productivity factor comes into play. That was the lion's share of the negative productivity that we had. Okay, great. Okay. Okay. Then I wanted to ask about the, you know, there was a comment, David, I think that you made about lower quote-to-order turns. I wanted to ask about, you know, last quarter and the second quarter, you know, you called out that there was a lot of quoting activity. Was there something that changed in the last three months that, you know, where there's delays in some of these, you know, quote-to-order times? Quote activity, Walt, actually is remaining very robust. We're in great conversations with customers. There's high levels of demand around quotation activity. The conversion on those quotes to orders has taken longer. What we saw was that that began to take effect in Q2. We talked about that in the last call. That's what you're referring to, I believe. As we progressed through this quarter, we saw that continue but we are seeing many projects that had been stuck in that cycle start to break loose as we've come into January. That's very encouraging. I don't know, in all cases what all the drivers are, but I would say, you know, we're seeing a new capital budget as people enter their new fiscal periods, and we're seeing, you know, a better view on stabilization around economic activity, perhaps, or a later cycle, recession, if there's a view there is a recession. People are, you know, moving forward with investments that they were pausing on as we saw them pause through the last couple of quarters. The quotation activity, if I miscommunicated that, is not an issue. Demand visibility looks good. It's more the conversion and the timing on those projects and how they're coming through. Okay, great. Great. Thanks for the clarification. That sounds very good. And maybe just a last one for me, on the gross margin conversation. You know, you guys have that 40% target, which is great, and it sounds like there's a little bit of a headwind this quarter. How are you thinking? Once you get through that rail gross margin issue, you know, how do you? Are you looking for more step change, you know, like you had in 2023, in 2024, or is it going to be more incremental? Yeah, I'll take that. Walt, it's really going to be, you know, a continuous improvement process that we're going to, you know, step up. You know, in essence, we'll be, you know, exiting this year at roughly the 37% gross margin level. Over the next, 4+ years, you know, we really would need about 300 basis points to get to the 40% target gross margin in fiscal 2027. We think it's going to be more of s teady level. I think it's gonna be steady and progressive. We're gonna try to put more proof points on the board each time we report and, you know, be pointing to how we're climbing that hill, you know. If you think about it on a linearized basis, you might be thinking it's a 75 basis point kinda climb per year to get to that 40%. There will be some lumps in there with some larger initiatives that we have planned that, you know, maybe a more year+ out in terms of timing and impact. The progression through productivity improvements, our 80/20 work, the work that we're doing around better management in the supply chain and the visibility to our planning will enable us, I think, to show steady and consistent progress. Okay, sounds great. Okay, thank you very much. Thanks, Walt. Thank you. The next question is coming from Patrick Baumann of JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Hey, Pat. Pat. Good morning. Good morning. A quick one, just mechanically on the backlog. Just, with book-to-bill below 1 in the quarter, how did it hold up stable sequentially? Like, what are kind of the moving parts there? Yeah. It was more, FX-driven, I guess. Yeah. Pat, than anything else. If you think about the move in FX in the period, we saw a book-to-bill that was less than one. We shipped $230, we booked $215, the gap is really the FX adjustment in the period. It's all FX, Pat. You know, the backlog is marked to, you know, the U.S. dollars as of December 31st. You know, the euro moved quite a bit from basically being below 1 in, at the end of September to roughly, I think today it's around 1.09. It would've been around 1.08 roughly at the end of December. Okay. Understood. On the orders, Dynamics, I think you said 6% growth in January, which I think you said is sequential versus maybe the third quarter, or? That's right, Pat. Yeah, it's sequential versus the third quarter up about 6% on a period-to-date basis through Friday of last week. Got it. Yeah. You'd kind of be up, you know, you know, into kinda close to 230 maybe if that continued, you know, through the quarter from that 215 number. My question is, assuming, you know, supply chain eases so you can work down the backlog to more normal levels, what absolute level of orders do you think you need to support an outlook for low to mid-single digit growth in revenue in 2024? We're forecasting that we see demand continue at current levels, that we're, you know, we're seeing a relatively stable base of activity through the period, and we can support the level of outcome that we talked about with a stable base of demand. It's not, you know, overly aggressive or ambitious as it relates to increasing order activity, nor is it assuming any material declines in demand. You know, we're obviously working on initiatives that will help us to grow and to, you know, gain access to more opportunities. If things do improve, we'll, you know, certainly be seeking to capitalize on them. We think that with a basic, stable, continuous performance that we've been having, we can, we can execute to those levels. What is kind of, I think you said this in the past, what's the normal backlog level? Like, what's kind of a more normalized level than, you know, the $330 you're at right now? If you look at the legacy business, we have about $125 million more backlog than historical levels. That means, you know, we're roughly at, we used to run, say roughly at $160 million of backlog, so that would take you to $285 million. The difference between the $329 million and the $285 million is the precision conveyance backlog for Garvey and Dorner. Got it. Okay, that's helpful. Just one quick one on the SG&A side. The commentary around, you know, in the slides and I think on the intro around, you know, working to, you know, find more cost reductions, like what's, can you give some color around, you know, the actions you're taking there and that may be actions you've already taken as well, and how we should think about the run rate of SG&A, you know, into next year? Okay. Yeah. Pat, we're not satisfied with our SG&A as a percentage of sales. As we plan for next year, and we think about the volume that we have in the business, given that moderate growth that we were talking about, we think that there's, you know, a need for us to be more proactive as it relates to the cost base. Clearly, what we've said in previous discussions is that we are gonna get benefit from scale, and that's very true. As we execute on our strategy and grow the business, there are opportunities for us to get good scale on the investments that we have in place. We're also taking a proactive approach to the new structure that we've put in place that enables us to unlock, we think, some more value as it relates to that cost structure. You know, we're taking a hard look at that in the period. We're not giving a specific guide at this point, you know, we'll probably be more prepared to talk about that as we enter Q1 and finish up this year. Yeah. Pat, overall as we think about our long-term target of the 21% EBITDA margin, we're looking at roughly, you know, 40% gross margins. SG&A as a percent of sales of roughly 21%, there's, you know, a point and a half add back for depreciation. You know, getting to 21% is a combination of being really efficient with our spend, but also scaling, as David mentioned. Got it. Got it. Okay. In a year in which maybe the growth isn't as high as you would want in the long-term plan, you would look to be more efficient, I guess, on your spend, sounds like. Yeah. Yeah. Look at structural costs. structural costs, and we will benefit from a lot of the IT investments that we've made in digital investments over the past year, including, you know, a couple of SAP implementations this past year, you know, both in Künzelsau as well as in Mexico. Okay. That makes sense. Thanks for the time. Appreciate it. Okay. Absolutely. Thanks, Pat. Thank you. Once again, ladies and gentlemen, if you do have a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad at this time. The next question is coming from Jon Tanwanteng of CJS Securities. Please proceed with your follow-up question. Hi, guys. Just a follow-up on the large customer that's currently paused in e-commerce. Do you expect them to come back in the near-term at any point, and would it be at a similar level of scale or something different? I assume their push for automation isn't gonna decrease at all, so just wondering what your thoughts are on their ability to you know. That's a great question, Jon, we're very actively engaged in dialogue with them as a customer and working with them and many other customers in the space and excited about the opportunities that exist there. Obviously, it's a pretty material impact to absorb in a, you know, a 9-month period. We, you know, we're really proud of the team, really excited about the investments we've made in this space, and think that the longer-term opportunities there are really great. When you look at what will happen over time and the CapEx that'll be spent in automating, delivery and execution as people think about e-commerce or e-delivery, we think we're gonna really see some nice developments there, both with this customer and others. The discussions that we're having involve project opportunities that are every bit as large as what we've experienced in the past and could be even more significant. Obviously that depends on timing and how things develop and the pace at which they do. When you look more broadly at the market in general, and you think about the distribution and execution of order fulfillment and the automation needs in that environment and our focus on being very relevant there, I think there's a nice opportunity. Got it. Thank you. Just coming back to the improvement in cash flow, I know you're planning to pay down $10 million in debt. What's the plan for the excess at this point? I know you've been repurchasing some shares. Are you planning to keep that powder dry, or is that a potential use of the capital? Yeah. We will be, you know, pushing the entire quarter on the cash front to reduce inventory and, you know, collect more receivables, et cetera. A lot of times, you know, the last couple of weeks of the quarter is when you see a, you know, pretty significant spike as, you know, we're putting the full court press on. So we'll probably end up with the cash on the balance sheet. Okay. Got it. Thank you. Great. Thanks, Jon. Thank you. At this time, we're showing no additional questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any additional or closing comments. Great. Thank you, Donna. We appreciate everyone's interest in Columbus McKinnon. In closing, Q3 represented another proof point along the path to delivering on our strategic objectives. We had double-digit growth on a constant currency basis, a 32% increase in operating income. We made progress towards improving customer experience, and we further reduced debt. We are excited about our future, and we look forward to updating you again after we close out the fiscal year. Have a great day, everyone. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's event. You may disconnect your lines at this time or log off the webcast and enjoy the rest of your day.