Welcome to Cummins Inc's Q1 Earnings Release. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. We ask that you please limit to one question and one follow-up. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press Star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Mr. Chris Clulow, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you, Rob. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our teleconference today to discuss Cummins' results for the Q1 of 2025. Participating with me today are Jennifer Rumsey, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Smith, our Chief Financial Officer. We will all be available to answer questions at the end of the teleconference. Before we start, please note that some of the information that you will hear or be given today will consist of forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements express our forecasts, expectations, hopes, beliefs, and intentions on strategies regarding the future. Our actual future results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements because of a number of risks and uncertainties. More information regarding such risks and uncertainties is available in the forward-looking disclosure statements in the slide deck and our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly the risk factors section of our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequently filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. During the course of this call, we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures, and we will refer you to our website for the reconciliation of those measures to GAAP financial measures. Our press release with a copy of the financial statements and a copy of today's webcast presentation[crosstalk] are available on our website within the Investor Relations section at cummins.com. With that out of the way, I'll turn you over to our Chair and CEO, Jennifer Rumsey, to kick us off. Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. As you can see from our press release and earnings material, we delivered very strong results in the Q1, led by record performance in our Power Systems segment. We are entering uncharted territory as the trade tariffs start to have a more significant impact beginning in the Q2. The breadth and changing nature of the tariffs have introduced a great degree of uncertainty and mean that at this time we are unable to predict with confidence our expected performance for the year. It is important to note that we serve many different end markets, some with long backlogs and clear secular themes in our Power Systems business, some less sensitive to short-term economic sentiment such as our aftermarket business, and other markets where customers tend to flex demand more quickly when business confidence weakens. The duration of uncertainty and extent of tariffs will influence how much and for how long demand is impacted. Cummins is in a strong position strategically and financially with an experienced leadership team well-versed in navigating through periods of uncertainty. We look forward to restoring our guidance when we have more stability in the outlook. Now I will move on to some of our highlights from our Q1. Then I will discuss our sales and end market trends by region. I will then provide an update on how uncertainties in our current environment may impact our end markets. Mark will then take you through more details of our Q1 financial performance. In the Q1, we continued to make progress in the execution of our Destination Zero strategy. In our Engine segment, we introduced the much-anticipated X10 as a part of our Cummins HELM platforms. This engine replaces both the L9 and X12 engine platforms and will deliver a new level of performance, durability, and efficiency for heavy and medium-duty customers. Alongside the X15 and B Series, the X10 provides customers with a power solution to meet their unique operational requirements while maintaining the performance and reliability for which Cummins is known. In addition, we unveiled the new Cummins B7.2 diesel engine that brings the latest technology and advancements to one of our most proven platforms. The new engine will feature a slightly higher displacement and is designed to be a global platform, which creates flexibility for different applications and duty cycles. Both the B7.2 and X10 engines will be manufactured at Rocky Mount Engine Plant in North Carolina and will go into production in North America in 2027. In our Power Systems segment, we announced the acquisition of assets of First Mode, a leader in retrofit hybrid solutions for mining and rail operations. This technology represents the first commercially available retrofit hybrid system for mining equipment, significantly reducing total cost of ownership while advancing decarbonization and operations. This acquisition reinforces Cummins' commitment to providing innovative and effective decarbonization solutions while meeting the needs of our customers on their transition to a lower carbon future. Lastly, our Accelera by Cummins segment announced the supply of a 100-megawatt proton exchange membrane, or PEM, electrolyzer system for BP's Lingen Green Hydrogen project in Germany. The hydrogen generation system will be the largest electrolyzer system assembled by Accelera to date and will be manufactured in Accelera's new electrolyzer plant in Spain. Once fully commissioned in 2027, the 100-megawatt electrolyzer system will produce up to 11,000 tons of green hydrogen per year. Now I will comment on the overall company performance for the Q1 of 2025 and cover some of our key markets. Demand for our products remains strong across many of our key markets and regions, offset by softening in the North America truck market. Revenues for the Q1 were $8.2 billion, a decrease of 3% compared to the Q1 of 2024. EBITDA was $1.5 billion, or 17.9%, compared with $2.6 billion, or 30.6% a year ago. Q1 2024 results included a gain net of transaction costs and other expenses of $1.3 billion related to the Atmus divestiture and $29 million of restructuring expenses. Excluding the one-time gain and the costs related to the separation of Atmus, as well as restructuring expenses, EBITDA and gross margin dollars improved compared to the Q1 of 2024. This improvement in profitability was driven by the benefit of higher power generation and aftermarket volumes, pricing, and operational efficiency, which more than exceeded the impact of lower North America truck volumes and the separation of Atmus. For our Power Systems business in particular, we had record performance in both EBITDA dollars and percentage in the Q1, as we continue to benefit from operational improvements and strong end markets. Our Q1 revenues in North America decreased by 1% compared to 2024. Industry production of heavy-duty trucks for the Q1 was 63,000 units, down 18% from 2024 levels, while our heavy-duty unit sales were down 21,000, or 21% from 2024. Industry production of medium-duty trucks was 32,000 units in the Q1 of 2025, a decrease of 21%, while our unit sales were 31,000, down 14% from 2024. We shipped 29,000 engines to Stellantis for use in their Ram pickups in the Q1 of 2025, down 25% from 2024 levels. Revenues for North America power generation increased by 12%, driven primarily by continued strong data center demand. Our international revenues decreased by 5% in the Q1 of 2025 compared to a year ago. Q1 revenues in China, including joint ventures, were $1.8 billion, an increase of 9%, as accelerating data center demand and high domestic infrastructure demand more than offset lower export demand. Industry demand for medium and heavy-duty trucks in China was 294,000 units, a decrease of 4% from last year. Our sales and units, including joint ventures, were 42,000, an increase of 6%. Industry demand for excavators in China in the Q1 was 61,000 units, an increase of 23% from 2024 levels. Our units sold were 11,000, an increase of 19%. The increase in the China market size is primarily due to domestic cyclical replacement demand, rural development, and farmland renovation demand. Sales of power generation equipment in China increased 68% in the Q1 due to accelerating data center demand. Q1 revenues in India, including joint ventures, were $725 million, a decrease of 14% from the Q1 a year ago. Industry truck production was flat with 2024. Power generation revenues decreased by 11% in the Q1, as the prior year included a pre-buy ahead of emissions regulations change. To summarize, we achieved impressive results in the Q1 with record financial performance in our Power Systems business. Looking ahead, there's heightened uncertainty about the pace of growth in the global economy due to tariffs, which could negatively impact demand for capital goods. Absent more clarity about the likely duration of elevated tariffs, we are not able to provide a reliable forecast for the remainder of this year. As a large U.S. headquartered company with significant manufacturing in the U.S., we appreciate the administration's support for American manufacturing. This support is crucial as we invest more than $1 billion in our engine and Power Systems manufacturing operations in the U.S. over the next few years, employing people in nearly every state through our manufacturing plants and sales and service branches. As we evaluate our current manufacturing footprint and our exposure to tariff regulations, we believe we are well-positioned because we primarily produce engines and gensets in the markets where we sell them. For instance, our medium-duty, heavy-duty, and high-horsepower engines, as well as power generation products for U.S. customers, are manufactured in our plants located in Indiana, North Carolina, New York, and Minnesota. However, like much of our industry, our Components and supplier manufacturing would be affected by current tariff regulations, which could disrupt the global economy and ultimately lead to higher costs for consumers. In addition to trade and economic uncertainty, there is also uncertainty in North America emissions regulations for 2027. We continue to expect new NOx regulation to go in place in 2027 and are focused on launching our products on schedule while also working with the administration as they explore options to lower the cost of existing regulations. While we believe our product plan is well-positioned, the uncertainty in regulations, along with economic uncertainties, have led to a weaker-than-anticipated recent quarter and also have made pre-buy for the H2 of the year unlikely. In summary, we had a strong Q1 and continued our progress in improving EBITDA margins, as we shared in our Analyst Day almost a year ago, with tariffs not a significant factor in our results. The economic environment has changed significantly over the past three months. We have an experienced leadership team that has demonstrated capability in managing through periods of uncertainty, and we will maintain focus on our customers, our employees, and shareholders. We enter this period of heightened uncertainty in a position of strength and look forward to reinstating our guidance when some of the uncertainty has subsided. Now let me turn it over to Mark. Thank you, Jen, and good morning, everyone. We delivered strong revenue and profitability in the Q1. Q1 revenues were $8.2 billion, down 3% from a year ago. Sales in North America decreased 1%, while international revenues declined 5%. The separation of Atmus in mid-March in the prior year resulted in year-over-year sales decline of around 4% to the total consolidated sales, meaning that we were close to flat on an underlying basis. EBITDA was $1.5 billion, or 17.9% of sales for the quarter, compared to $2.6 billion, or 30.6% of sales a year ago, which, of course, included a one-time gain on the divestiture of the Atmus business of $1.3 billion net of transaction costs. Also, a year ago, we incurred $29 million of restructuring expenses. To provide clarity on operational performance and allow comparison to the prior year, I'm excluding the one-time gain and the costs related to the separation of Atmus and the restructuring expenses in my following comments. EBITDA was $1.5 billion, or 17.9% of sales for the quarter, compared to adjusted $1.3 billion, or 15.5% of sales a year ago. The higher EBITDA was driven by higher power generation and aftermarket volumes, positive price- cost driven by operational improvements, partially offset by lower North America truck volumes, and the separation of Atmus. Now let's look at each line item a little more. Gross margin for the quarter was $2.2 billion, or 26.4% of sales, up from $2.1 billion, or 24.5% last year. The improved margins were driven by favorable pricing, higher aftermarket, and operational improvements, especially in Power Systems. Selling, administrative, and research expenses were $1.1 billion, or 13.6% of sales, compared to $1.2 billion, or 13.8% of sales a year ago. Joint venture income of $131 million increased $8 million from the prior year, primarily driven by higher technology fees within our Engine business and higher volumes in our Cummins Chongqing joint venture within Power Systems. Other income was $23 million compared to $21 million from the prior year, as gains on investments related to company-owned life insurance more than offset the negative impact of foreign currency revaluation. Interest expense was $77 million, a decrease of $12 million from the prior year, primarily driven by a lower average debt balance as a result of the separation of Atmus and lower weighted average interest rates. The all-in effective tax rate in the Q1 was 23.9%, including $7.05 per diluted share of favorable discrete tax items. All-in net earnings for the quarter were $824 million, or $5.96 per diluted share, compared to $2 billion, or $14.33 per diluted share a year ago, which includes the net gain on the separation of Atmus, which was $1.3 billion, or $9.08 per diluted share, and restructuring expenses of $29 million, or $0.15 per diluted share. Hopefully, we have now lapped all of those exclusions and adjustments and look forward to having less words around those in future quarters. All-in operating cash flow was an outflow of $3 million compared to an inflow of $276 million a year ago, primarily driven by higher working capital. Now let me comment a little more on segment performance. For the Engine segment, Q1 revenues were $2.8 billion, a decrease of 5% from a year ago. EBITDA was 16.5%, up from 14.1% a year, even on the lower truck volumes. T he Engine business benefited from pricing related to the launch of updated products, now a light-duty segment, stronger aftermarket volumes, operational efficiencies, good cost control, and a modest increase in joint venture income. Components segment revenue was $2.7 billion, a decrease of 20%, while EBITDA, excluding costs related to the separation of Atmus, decreased to 14.3% from 14.8% a year ago, as lower on-highway demand in North America and Europe, and the diluted impact of the Atmus separation was partially offset by the benefit from operational efficiencies. In the Distribution segment, revenues increased 15% from a year ago to $2.9 billion. EBITDA also increased as a percent of sales to 12.9% compared to 11.6% of sales a year ago, driven by higher power generation volumes, higher aftermarket, and favorable pricing. In the Power Systems segment, revenues were $1.6 billion, an increase of 19%. EBITDA was a record, increasing from 17.1% to 23.6% of sales driven by strong volume, particularly in data center applications and rebuilds, favorable pricing, and continued focus on operational improvement. Accelera revenues increased 11% to $103 million, driven by increased e-mobility sales and electrolyzer installations arising from prior period orders. Our EBITDA loss was $86 million compared to an EBITDA loss of $101 million a year ago, as we lowered costs in existing operations, partially offset by additional losses in the Amplify Cell joint venture as it advances its operations. In summary, we delivered impressive profitability for the Q1, even as demand in North America truck markets declined. Uncertainty has increased due to trade tariffs, resulting in a slowdown in the global movement of goods, particularly between China and the U.S. It remains to be seen how long the tariffs remain in place and the impact that they have on business confidence and the demand for capital goods. Cummins is in a strong financial position to navigate through uncertainty with our industry-leading portfolio of products and our global network. We are well-placed to support our customers. We look forward to reinstating our outlook when the economic conditions become clearer, along with hopefully a return to growth and greater prosperity here in the U.S. and in the global economy. In the meantime, we'll continue to focus on areas we can control in managing costs and optimizing working capital while meeting our customer commitments. We'll stay focused on our strategic priorities in what is likely to be a more complex operating environment in the coming months, as the full impact of the current tariff levels has not yet been felt, in our opinion. I want to close my prepared remarks by thanking Chris Clulow for his leadership in investor relations. He's moving to a new finance leadership role in operations and supply chain and will remain a key advisor to me and our business leaders as we navigate through the current challenges. Congratulations to Nick Ahrens in assuming the investor relations role. Nick and I look forward to meeting with investors and analysts in person in the coming weeks and months. We're very fortunate to have such a strong finance team at Cummins. Now let me turn it back over to Chris. Thank you, Mark. Out of consideration to others on the call, I would ask that you limit yourself to one question and a related follow-up. If you have an additional question, please rejoin the queue. Operator, we're ready for our first question. Thank you. At this time, we'll be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press Star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press Star two if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the Star keys. As a reminder, we ask that you please limit to one question and one follow-up. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. Our first question comes from Jamie Cook with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question. Hi, good morning, and nice quarter. I guess just my first question, understanding you're not providing guidance, but based on what's been announced so far, is there any way you can sort of help us quantify the gross or net tariff cost? You know what I mean? That would impact your business and which segments are impacted the most. I guess my second question, just trying to understand which businesses have the most visibility, like where your backlog sits today, and just how you're handling pricing, just concerned with some of the businesses that have greater backlog, perhaps there's pricing risk associated with tariffs. Thank you. Thanks, Jamie. I'll answer the first question and pass it on to Jen. It's a very uncertain set of circumstances given the changing and evolving nature of the tariffs, so we're not going to quantify that today. Quite frankly, the bigger concern is the broader impact on the overall economic level environment. We've taken the steps without knowing what the tariffs were going to be. We've taken what steps we could to try and mitigate the impact. Beyond that, to the extent that we incur tariffs, we're going to have to pass those on. We will, of course, as we get into actual results, share what the impact of tariffs is going to be. There's inevitably going to be some lag between cost and recovery, and we'll provide more color going forwards. Yeah. In terms of what we're seeing in different markets, as I noted, we do have some different markets that we expect to be impacted in different ways by uncertainty in the economy. We have a multi-year order board in our power generation business, and where there are customers that want to cancel or push out builds, we're able to reallocate those to other customers. For the foreseeable future, we're feeling pretty confident in that part of the business. Aftermarket, of course, as customers may delay purchase decisions, that can drive aftermarket business for us. The real market that is very sensitive is in the Engine business and Components, some of those on-highway markets. We're seeing that, right? You saw that on Friday with the heavy-duty truck orders for April, where customers are waiting to see what happens and pausing, in many cases, on placing orders for new trucks. It is a little bit varied in different parts of our business with a big question of what will happen over the next couple of months. As Mark said, we are looking at passing on tariff costs where we cannot mitigate those and continuing to invest in our new products and price for value that we are able to offer through those. It's certainly not a case that we're seeing a widespread change in short-term momentum. There are obviously pockets where uncertainty seems to be more evident. It's that lack of clarity that's led us to believe the right thing to do right now is withdraw guidance versus constantly tweaking it for every latest change in momentum. We didn't do that lightly. We're not trying to foreshadow anything other than that the uncertainty is high, but it's very much varied. Hopefully, there's going to be a change, and we'll be happy to reinstate that guidance as quickly as we can. Our next question comes from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question. Yes. Hi, good morning, everyone. Chris and Nick, congratulations. I want to ask in Power Systems, really fantastic performance from an absolute basis and also relative to the Analyst Day targets. Sitting here today, obviously, we have some volatility on costs for next year. Can you talk about where we should be thinking about margins moving forward for this business? Is the level of performance that we saw in this quarter, should we be thinking about that as the run rate going forward as we think about what incremental volumes could look like over the next couple of years once we do get through this low visibility spot mark that you spoke to? Yeah. First, thanks and good morning, Jerry. What I'd say is there are no significant one-off items in those results. So those are pure operating results. Of course, they're going to depend to some extent on the ebbs and flows of demand in individual segments. The only thing I'd point to in those results is that the aftermarket sales were very high. They're probably higher than we would have anticipated three months ago. Right now, that's the only thing that I would say looks, yeah, probably higher than we expected. Other than that, the business has made tremendous improvement, and it's continued to improve quarter on quarter. I would say the results were a little bit better than we expected, but mostly down to the strength in aftermarket, not the underlying performance of the business. Again, as long as the demand trends continue, then it will be continuing to push to maintain very strong margins and improve where we can. Super. Separately, you mentioned, Jennifer, in the prepared remarks just the uncertainty around EPA 27. In the scenario that EPA 27 does not move forward, can you just talk about Cummins' response in that environment? Because obviously, you folks have invested a lot in the next engine family, and how should we think about potential contract renegotiations of 27 plus if we do not get a changeover with your large customers on highway? Yeah. Great. Thanks, Jerry. Our current view is that likely we'll see a revision in a rulemaking process around Greenhouse Gas Phase III. Those regulations will change from what we have currently on the books, and those go into effect, of course, starting in 2030. We still anticipate NOx regulation in 2027. We're actively working with EPA on their work to look at opportunities to lower cost and impact those. Probably one likely thing that will be looked at is this requirement for a longer emissions warranty that customers purchase. Today, customers have the option when they buy a new vehicle to purchase an extended warranty. Some of them do, in particular in heavy duty, but the regulations as they are today would require everybody to purchase that. We're continuing to invest in bringing these new platforms to market with that 2027 regulation. It's difficult for me to speculate beyond that on other changes. Of course, if there are further changes, we'll look at revisiting what we're launching. We intend to continue to launch as planned currently. Right. That is the same question for all engine manufacturers, right? The whole industry's been investing in new products, so we're all wondering, hoping for clarity. Yeah. Our next question comes from Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question. Hi, good morning, everyone, and thanks for taking my question. Listen, I know it's incredibly a lot of or a lot of uncertainty out there, incredible amount of uncertainty and just very wide range of outcomes. I was wondering if you could perhaps talk a little bit more about one specific scenario for 2Q, meaning there's tariffs that are already in place today that you have a little bit more visibility to. If we just kind of put aside maybe some of the reciprocal or errors that are paused, can you just talk to what is the impact or kind of margin and sales volume that you kind of see based on orders, backlog, in terms of paying today for 2Q? Just want to get a better sense of kind of directionally what that implies very near term, accepting that you know whatever term there might be more. What I will say is the impact of tariffs on our financial results in Q1 was immaterial. Those results that you saw, which were very strong, had essentially close to zero financial impact. That is going to change, right? It is going to change, and it is going to change month to month, certainly as we start to go through the Q2. Probably it is contributing to the biggest degree of uncertainty for the H2 of the year in terms of the demand outlook. There is uncertainty now, but the visibility of the H2 is weak. We will give the impacts of the tariffs as we go along in our financial results. Needless to say, I would say it is going to build over the next few months. There will be some lag inevitably between ordering, incurring, mitigating, and recovering all of those costs. I would say the H2, we're going to see the fullest impact, assuming the tariffs remain as they are, which is a big assumption. Hopefully, it's not a good assumption, but if we make it as an assumption, then you're going to start to see the fuller impact on consumers of equipment, right, and suppliers in the H2 of the year. We will update you as we go along, but there's a lot of work going on, a lot of moving parts. I know everyone wants to do these calculations. I will just step back and say our broader concern is on the demand of the economic environment and the overall level of demand. The tariffs will be significant for Cummins from a cost basis based on where they are right now. We've got plans to manage through that, and we'll provide that to you going forward. As we said at the start, we've taken steps to mitigate where we incur them. We'll be looking to pass them on. There'll be some lag, in fact. Understood. That's very helpful. Maybe just a little bit of a bigger picture question. Just the Power Systems, you talked about some of the aftermarket strength. Particularly on the data center side, I tend to think about those kind of large backup generators as not really having a lot of aftermarket in the first place, again, in that data center piece. Could you just talk about what you're seeing in terms of what's driving the aftermarket parts, demand growth, and Power Systems? To the extent that you're seeing maybe more purchases of aftermarket related to maybe the data centers, what does that tell you about how your assets are being run? If there's some kind of maybe substituting for prime power wherever there's a little bit more of a shortage or any other factors that might impact how your assets are being used? Yeah. I appreciate the question. I think what's happening with Power Systems, which is I understand why, I'm not being critical. The lens is all zoned in on data centers. What you see in aftermarket parts is the use of all of the applications: mining, oil and gas, marine, power gen for the broader economy, rebuild activity. All those things are contributing. In fact, some price increases in aftermarket are all contributing to the strong revenue. It is not a data center-driven phenomenon in the moment. Eventually, there will be some parts consumption on this, but it will be nothing like a mining engine or a frac rig. I just wanted to clear that up. I would just take this opportunity to remind people the performance improvement in the Power Systems business is not driven by fair winds in the data center, right? There's been a broad-based improvement. We're very appreciative of the opportunity to serve the data center customers, and that's positive for our business. The Power Systems leadership team has done a great job in driving up our margins in most parts of what they do below the surface. I just want to make sure we're enthusiastic about data center demand. We're not changing that enthusiasm. This is a much bigger story. The improvement and the aftermarket really relates to what's gone on in years before. I hope that helped. Maybe just one other reminder as we think about the Power Systems business and its markets is there's a strong partnership between Power Systems and our Distribution business. Just in power gen, about half of the revenue shows up in Power Systems. The other half in the Distribution business. Similar in aftermarket, the Distribution business plays an important role in the service that's provided to those customers. Our next question comes from Tim Thein with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question. Thank you. Good morning. Mark, it was nice of Chris to cook up these new snazzy slides on his way. It was good. Yeah. They told me I was very old-fashioned. Yeah. Not used to that. New look. Just on Mark on the business, maybe we can dig a bit more on the margin performance there. Specifically, you mentioned aftermarket being a contributor. Maybe just a comment in terms of your expectation for parts as we look forward. I guess related to that on the JV income, I know that those technology fees can move around a bit, but that was a nice tailwind. Think about kind of the balance of the year. If you're still expecting this is not just the Engine business, but the JV income to be a headwind to profits for the year, is that still the expectation just given some of the uptick in China? Thank you. Those are my two-part question. Engine business. Yeah. Engine business margins were up, right? Of course, we set out our stall for improving margins. In the current quarter relative to the prior year, JV income, as you said, improved from some of the tech fees. They're going to be lumpy. Probably won't continue at that rate. China haven't been seeing any dramatic changes in demand for some time. That's a past-looking comment, not a forward-looking comment. It's been pretty steady. Yes, probably could be a little bit lower going forward. Product coverage or warranty, as many people refer to it, has been an enormous success story over multiple years, of which the Engine business is the biggest driver of that. That really helped in the Q2 for the company. Our product coverage costs were 1.9% in the quarter. Normally, we'd be looking in the 2%-2.5% range. That was a real positive. Strong parts demand. It remains to be seen. We hope parts demand will remain resilient as we work through this period of uncertainty, but we do not know. We got some additional pricing where we launched products in the light-duty part of the business. There were many ingredients to the Engine business improvement. Of course, the Full Year, we can say we are off to a good start. We, of course, were expecting, like others, some accelerating truck demand in the H2 of the year. Right now, the momentum you have seen in the truck orders, you do not need me to tell you the momentum has been going in the wrong way. We will have to see. Overall, it is a good start. There are a number of factors, some of which may continue, some of which may fade. Volume's going to be the big question, I think, from here. I just want to remind you, as you look at overall really strong performance in Q1, even with softening in North America truck, we remain focused on the key areas we've been talking to you about, including in our last Analyst Day, even as we manage through uncertainty and tariffs and work to mitigate tariffs. Improving gross margin in the business. We have growing aftermarket population that allows that aftermarket revenue to continue to grow over time. We're still investing in critical areas. We continue to invest in capacity expansion in the Power Systems business and these next-generation engine platforms while also monitoring the pace of decarbonization and regulation and pacing investment in other areas. We continue to be focused on that even as we navigate through this uncertain time. Our next question comes from David Raso with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question. Hi. Thank you. The comment earlier about more worried about demand destruction, just curious, a very understandable view just from a broad macro view. I can appreciate that. I'm just curious, are these comments based off of already communicating maybe what your cost increases would need to be and a pushback from your truck customers? Or is it even the end user of the truck saying, "Hey, at that price increase, we'll cancel backlog"? I'm just curious, how much is this a ready sort of floated price increase that would be needed to cover your cost that's getting that reaction? Or again, is it more just a broad and again, understandable, just a broad macro view? Of course, these tariffs can hurt the economy. Yeah. Yeah, David, what I'd say is really uncertainty and a broader thing. I was at ACT Expo a week ago today, talked to many both OEM and fleet customers. They just don't know, right? They're just waiting because there's a huge amount of uncertainty on what's going to happen both economically and with tariffs. That's really it. It's the wait and see. That said, I know you do not want to go into a real exact quantification, but just to level set everybody, can you help us with your greatest exposures to cost, be it 6%-7% of Global COGS is Mexico and China, something like that so we can at least quantify it? At the same time, hopefully, if the tariffs come down, quantify it in a positive way. Also, what mitigating factors have already been put in place or at least are imminent based off the tariffs of today? Thank you. Yeah. I'm just going to be honest and say I'm not going to answer all of those questions for some of the reasons I said earlier. What I can say is our U.S. on-highway engine plants are USMCA compliant, right? In the terms of the operations that we do for our on-highway markets, which is the largest proportion of our business. We're in many markets, but that's the largest proportion. We are USMCA compliant for all of those large engine plants. It's really what happens here from these tariffs. Yes, there's some exposure to China. Yes, there's some exposure to Mexico. Yes, there's some exposure to some of the other countries as well. We're going to quantify that on a quarter-by-quarter basis. We're working through all of that with suppliers, with customers, and we'll provide an update as we go forwards. Our next question comes from Rob Wertheimer with Melius Research. Please proceed with your question. Hi. Good morning. It was a remarkable quarter on margin on a lot of fronts. I understand the comments within power system on all the work you've done. Nonetheless, I do have a data center question. You mentioned China. I wonder if you'd be willing to sort of talk about, for one, I'm not 100% sure how you serve data centers there, whether it's direct or through JV. Two, I wonder if you could provide any context or color around size geographically in the data center market or momentum, etc. Is this largely a U.S. phenomenon, or are there other areas that are importantly big? Thank you. The trends that are driving data center growth are global trends, right? Increasing use of AI, data storage going into cloud digitization. Those underlying trends are global trends. Our market, we have global markets, but in particular, U.S and China have been areas where we've seen a lot of growth. Like we serve the US market through our US plants, we primarily serve the China market through plants in China, including joint venture plants that we have there. Yeah. Just to add on that, Rob, the primary backup gensets in China are run with the 60-liter engines, which are made in our Cummins Chongqing engine plant there. That is the primary source. Yeah. Like other major markets, we are one of the very leading players, right? It is a very select group of companies that are relied upon in this industry for backup power. Our next question comes from Kyle Menges with Citigroup. Please proceed with your question. Thank you. Jen, I wanted to touch on the comment you made just about the power gen business. You had just mentioned about cancellations and push-outs and being able to reallocate those orders. Was that more of a hypothetical, or is that something that you're seeing today? We're not seeing significant changes, but it's not atypical for some of that to happen, which we have seen. As I said, we have when it happens and expect that we continue to be able to reallocate. We have a lot of customers that would like us to deliver some of these products sooner than it's currently scheduled. I wouldn't describe it as a broad trend, but a limited one that we're seeing. Yet another way. Okay. Got it. Okay. Got it. It's the business with the least visibility to any changing economic sentiment overall so far. Right. Makes sense. Could you guys just touch on a little bit any sort of tariff mitigation actions you've taken already? Just any mitigation steps you're exploring. Can you remind us, is there any sort of tariff pass-through baked into any of your contracts? That would also be helpful. Thank you. Yeah. Of course, mitigating when there's a high degree of uncertainty is a little bit tricky because we're waiting to have a little bit more clarity on where tariffs will go over time. What I would say is we have done some mitigation through inventory strategies where we anticipated we would see higher tariffs. We have dual sourcing in some of our supply base. There's some no-regrets moves that we're taking now. As we continue to have more clarity on what tariffs will look like, we may make changes in the dual sourcing. There are places where there are other options, but it will take time to develop alternatives. It is really a bit of a mix. As you can imagine, we have an extensive strategy and work underway looking at options and determining when we action those. As we said, we're working through all of this, which I think if you're not in the business, it'd be hard to appreciate how much work it is for supply chain and other groups. Yeah, we're working through all of that with suppliers and customers right now. We're not going to comment anymore. Our next question comes from Tami Zakaria with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question. Hey. Good morning. Thank you so much. My first question is on price-cost. Are you able to share what price-cost was in the Q1? Yes. We had about, almost exactly, 2% gross margin improvement year over year, of which we had about 3% of price-cost improvement and 1% of negative volume impacts. That price-cost impact varies quite a lot between segment, and you can figure that out from some of the improvements we've driven over time. Cost includes many things, including the improved warranty cost over time. That's the macro picture. Understood. That's very helpful. The second question is, I understand Cummins engines are primarily made in the U.S. for the U.S., which is great news long-term given all that's going on. For the Distribution and Components segments, are those primarily made in the U.S. as well? What's the mix of imports that serve the U.S. market for those two segments? The Distribution business is really just reselling parts from the rest of the company. It depends on the different applications. Components, we've got manufacturing facilities and aftertreatment systems in Wisconsin, turbochargers that are made in Charleston. It is the supply base and some of the suppliers that we use that bring more of that exposure, if we want to use that word. That is where the complexity comes in from the tariffs. I mean, that is what I would say. Our next question comes from Steven Fisher with UBS. Please proceed with your question. Thanks. Good morning and impressive quarter. I think you said that you are on track with the timing of your product launches. Can you just clarify kind of some of the timing of those launches that you had in mind, particularly around the 2027 engine and how the outcome of these NOx rules may impact the timing there? Yeah. As I said, right now, we have not changed our launch plans on any of those products. We are planning to launch the new 10-liter and the B7.2 in 2027 as those regulations go in place. We plan to launch the X15 diesel version in the 2026 timeframe. We'll have kind of a split strategy across the year with the current X15 and the new one. Remember, we already have launched the natural gas variant of that new platform. The diesel version is going to bring significant fuel efficiency improvements, so value to the customer that we believe is worth bringing into the market early. That is our plan. Terrific. In terms of the guidance, I'm curious kind of what you think you need to see in order to actually reinstate the guidance. Is it actual kind of signed trade agreements, or what degree of certainty do you think you need to be able to bring that guidance back? What I would say is a few more data points would be helpful, right? I mean, the April truck orders I would describe as disappointing. Is that something that can move back to a normal trend level? What do we see? I mean, tariffs are designed to be disruptive to trade, right? I mean, that's what they're designed for. We have seen that significant slowing, certainly, of freight activity into the West Coast. That directly impacts ultimately road freight here in the U.S. Even as things, let's hope they stabilize, improve, we have caused a slowing of the global supply chain. That's what happens. It's like things are queuing up at ports, and then it just takes a long time to right that momentum. I think if you're not in the industry, that may be underappreciated. The less time the uncertainty is in place, the more quickly I think we'll have greater clarity and confidence. The longer it's in place, it'll just make it more difficult. Ultimately, we're not going to continue forever without guidance, but we'll get a sense of where purchases of capital goods, whether their confidence is shaken or whether it's a temporary pause and we get back on, and we actually start to see more positive economic activity, right? Right now, we're not trying to comment on the whole of the global economy or even the whole of the U.S. economy. We're just commenting on the slices that we see, and uncertainty has gone up. We want to see a few more data points on the broader economy specific, certainly to on-highway as a ranking. Those would be helpful. Our next question comes from Chad Dillard with Bernstein. Please proceed with your question. Hey. Good morning, guys. I totally appreciate that it's difficult to quantify the impact of tariffs, but I was hoping you could lay out a timeline for that impact on the P&L. How much Components inventory did you pull forward? When does it run out? When will you need to raise price to offset the costs? If you could share the percentage of U.S. COGS that are imports. Yeah. It's way too many things to give because there's way too many variables. What I'll say is, just to remind you, no impact really in the Q1. Given the pause in some of the tariffs, then the escalation, and some mitigation actions, we're going to start to see creeping and growing impact even yet as the Q2 unfolds here. There's inevitably going to be some lags between what we see, what we anticipate, what actually happens, and all the work that's going on with customers and suppliers. That's the reason why. We will, when we get to the Q2 results and going forwards, tell you what the impact is. Hopefully, we've got more clarity then. We will certainly tell you what the impact was in the Q2 and what we think is going to happen to that run rate as we go through the rest of the year. I think nobody has absolute certainty on the direct flow of every single widget right through the supply chain. That is still evolving. We are not alone, right? We are not the only manufacturer of engines, powertrains, and Power Systems in our markets. Got it. Okay. Just one more. Just on Section 232, assuming that does eventually get applied, how does that impact your relative positioning? From your perspective, would you consider it good, bad, or neutral versus the status quo of what we are right now? For those that maybe haven't been paying attention, maybe you've all been paying attention, 232, the U.S. Commerce Department launched a 232 investigation two weeks ago on foreign production of medium and heavy-duty trucks and parts. That has the potential to result in additional tariffs on trucks and parts that come from outside the U.S. Of course, we've seen the announcement of we're in the middle of the public comment period, and we'll be providing comments, of course, as a part of that. Just emphasizing the U.S. manufacturing that we make and advocating for exemptions on imports to U.S. manufacturing through a robust exemption process and ensuring that we reflect the impact that any tariffs could have on the underlying U.S. economy. Stay tuned there, but that's the potential with 232 investigation. Our next question is from Jeff Kauffman with Vertical Research Partners. Please proceed with your question. Thank you. Thank you for sliding me in here. Chris, it's been great working with you. Nick, look forward to getting to know you. Mark, thank you for all the detail that you were able to give. I have one on currency. Given that so much of your business occurs outside the U.S., was currency translation a good guy, a bad guy? Can you give us an idea of magnitude? You explained the price increase on the light-duty engines well with the new product at Stellantis. Can we talk a little bit more about the ASP increase on the power system side? Was that also new products, product mix, larger products? You did mention aftermarket. Just kind of understand what's driving that increase as well. Sorry, you caught my attention with the pricing. Repeat the first part, sorry. Currency. Currency. Currency. [crosstalk] Currency. Currency. Yeah. Currency. [crosstalk] Currency. Yeah. The answer is, generally, if we could choose and we did not deploy hedging techniques, then a weaker dollar except against the pound would be our perfect choice of combinations. We do deploy. We have natural hedges from the way we are globally organized, and then we do use some very simple vanilla derivatives. The net impact is no. If you ask any individual business leader, Distribution in particular, they are more exposed to a strengthening dollar. The net result is very, very modest to the P&L, like less than $10 million when you look at all the impacts of the hedges. That has generally been the case for a long time. Sharp shifts, where we get caught, is when there are capital constraints and currency revaluations like Nigeria. Argentina is a common topic of conversation about what to do there. Net-net, Jeff, for the company, we're fortunate that we're close to neutral. Yeah. On your second question, Jeff, on the ASP for the Power Systems, power generation product, it's a tough one to gauge. That's really kind of a bit of a red herring because the size is so different across that portfolio. We have lower demand in the small stuff, think RVs or power or backup gensets at home versus strong growth in data centers. That can flex quite a bit, and it's usually not a really great indicator. We continue to see strength, I guess, through the Q1 in that big stuff. That drives a higher ASP. We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Chris Clulow for closing comments. Great. Thank you, everybody, for joining. Thank you. It's been a pleasure working with you all over the last couple of years. That concludes our teleconference for the day. We'll be available as an investor relations team for the remainder of the day should you have any follow-ups. Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation.