Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Compass Inc. 2025 Q3 earnings call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand. If you have dialed into today's call, please press star nine to raise your hand and star six to unmute. I will now hand the conference over to Soham Bhonsle, Head of Investor Relations. Soham, please go ahead. Thank you very much, Operator, and good morning, everybody. Thank you for joining the Compass third quarter 2025 earnings call. Joining us today will be Robert Reffkin, our founder and CEO, and Scott Wahlers, our Chief Financial Officer. In discussing our company's performance, we will refer to some Non-GAAP measures. You can find the reconciliation of these Non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in our third quarter 2025 earnings release posted on our Investor Relations website. Any discussion regarding organic revenue, organic OPEX, organic transactions, or organic GTV excludes any activity from businesses we acquired since July 1, 2024. We will make forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, forecasts, and assumptions, and involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include our guidance for the fourth quarter of 2025 and full year 2025, including comments related to our expected financial results, operating expenses, and free cash flow, as well as our expectations for operational achievements. Our actual results may differ materially from these statements. You can find more information about risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could affect our results in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and available on our Investor Relations website. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All information in this presentation is as of today's date, November 4. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update this information. In addition, as we announced in September, Compass has agreed to merge with Anywhere Real Estate. The transaction is pending customary regulatory and shareholder approval, and we expect to close in the second half of 2026. We intend to make limited comments related to the Anywhere transaction in our prepared remarks. However, given that we are currently in the regulatory process, please know that we will be unable to answer any questions or comment any further on the transaction beyond our prepared remarks. I will now turn the call over to Robert Reffkin. Robert. Thank you for joining us today for our third quarter conference call. In what remains a trough-level housing market, I am pleased to share that the Compass team produced the strongest Q3 results in our history. In Q3, Compass delivered record third quarter market share, delivered record third quarter revenue, delivered record third quarter Adjusted EBITDA, delivered record third quarter Adjusted EBITDA margin, delivered record Q3 free cash flow. The Compass platform hit a Q3 record of 22 average weekly sessions per agent, and we grew our Q3 title and escrow revenue to record levels. Furthermore, we achieved a few all-time records once again, including delivering the best organic principal agent recruiting quarter in the company's history, including adding 851 principal agents, growing our title and escrow attach in our legacy markets to all-time highs. Lastly, growing our mortgage JV earnings to record levels. Revenue in the third quarter increased by 23.6% year-over-year, and we achieved the high end of our revenue guide. Total transactions increased by 22%, and organic transactions were up 7% year-over-year as compared to the overall market, where transactions increased by 2%. So this means Compass's total transaction count growth outpaced the market's growth by close to 20 percentage points, and Compass's organic transaction count growth outpaced the market's growth by five percentage points. For 18 consecutive quarters, spanning our entire history as a public company, Compass has outperformed the market on an organic basis. There has never been a quarter since we started measuring this metric where Compass hasn't grown faster than the market. As I will touch on a little later, we believe we can continue to outgrow the market even once we close the Anywhere transaction. In Q3 2025, we generated Adjusted EBITDA of $93.6 million, an increase of 80% from the $52 million in the year-ago quarter, and we exceeded the high end of our Adjusted EBITDA guidance by 17%. Quarterly principal agent retention was a solid 97.3%. In the quarter, we also successfully added 851 gross principal agents organically to Compass, which is a new record. We are seeing more momentum at this point in the quarter compared to the same point in the last quarter. Given this increased momentum, we expect to add 800 gross principal agents organically in Q4. We see the new normal as 700-800 gross adds going forward as the new range. In the T&E business, excluding 2025 M&A, our attach rate continued to improve year-over-year and was once again at a record in Q3. The Christie's International Real Estate business also continues to grow, with four new affiliates joining the network in the quarter and six affiliates in the pipeline. As I will touch on a little later, I'm excited to share that the Christie's International Real Estate business is pacing better than our initial expectations, driven by outperformance in agent retention, outperformance in revenue synergies from T&E, outperformance in synergies from mortgage, and outperformance in OPEX control. Revenue less commissions and other related expenses as a percentage of revenue in the third quarter was 18.6%, which is approximately 73 basis points above the 17.8% reported in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP OPEX, excluding the $7.5 million related to the Anywhere transaction, was $252 million in Q3, which was relatively flat quarter-over-quarter as we continue to focus on OPEX control as a company. Last quarter, we shared that we expect to deliver an incremental $50 million-$75 million in Adjusted EBITDA, with at least $50 million of that Adjusted EBITDA improvement realized in 2026. I'm excited to share that we remain on track to deliver against this goal. Now, let me take a moment to touch on the transformational merger we announced with Anywhere Real Estate a few weeks ago. Since we made the announcement, our teams have been hard at work getting all the necessary regulatory forms in place, and we have now filed our HSR forms to start the regulatory approval process. We continue to be confident in our ability to get the deal approved, as we firmly believe that this is a pro-competitive deal that will bring more choice and better products to home sellers, to home buyers, to real estate professionals, and to franchise owners. As one of the largest shareholders in Compass, I believe this combination is highly compelling for all our shareholders. The positive reaction from agents inside and outside of Compass only reinforces my view that we are creating a premier platform in residential real estate that will make the home selling and home buying experience better for consumers and ensure that real estate professionals and franchise owners continue to thrive for decades to come. A common question we've fielded from investors since the announcement is whether we believe we can continue to grow organically post the merger. To answer this question, we believe we already have a blueprint in the Christie's International Real Estate transaction, which I will refer to as CIRE going forward. What have we observed since closing the CIRE acquisition? First, on agent count and retention. Since close, we've been able to increase the number of net new principal agents in the business. Total principal agents didn't decline post-close; they increased. Second, in the nine months since we closed the transaction, their title business has experienced a 1,000 basis point lift in attach rate as more of our agents' clients choose to work with their title business. The Anywhere transaction will, one, add a T&E presence in seven states where we currently have a brokerage presence, but no T&E presence. Two, we'll increase our T&E market coverage in many of the markets we have a smaller T&E presence in that is limited in market coverage. Given this increase in T&E market coverage, we believe we will achieve a significant lift in attach in these new markets as well as our existing markets. Next, in mortgage, Compass and CRE both had Guaranteed Rate mortgage JVs under separate brands. Post-close, we improved the profitability of these businesses resulting from OPEX efficiencies and increased attach rates. Anywhere also has a Guaranteed Rate mortgage JV, so we expect the similar integration efficiencies and attach rate improvements. Lastly, in terms of cost synergies, we are on track to achieve our stated $30 million target by bringing the Compass OPEX improvement playbook to this transaction. So as you can see. What we've been able to demonstrate in the Christie's International Real Estate transaction is that we can, one, grow agent count, two, increase T&E attach, three, improve mortgage JV profitability, and four, achieve the synergies that we've set out to achieve. In summary, we have proven an ability to drive both top and bottom line growth in Christie's International Real Estate post-close and to do so organically. I expect Anywhere agents to also see the positives of coming together to get the best of both worlds. While we recognize that the Anywhere transaction is clearly much bigger in size, we are confident that we can replicate the Christie's International Real Estate playbook at Anywhere over time. Before I move on from the Anywhere transaction, I want to address our synergy targets directly. When we first committed to aggressive cost reductions to manage our burn rate, a commitment I made very clearly to this community, we followed through. In 2022, I said we would bring OPEX down by $320 million. By the end of 2023, we reduced our OPEX by $550 million, with over $600 million reduced by 2025. We didn't just meet our goal; we exceeded it. That track record is the foundation of the commitment I am making today. Based on the analysis we completed at the time of the transaction, we articulated a net cost synergy target of $225+ million, not $225 million, but $225+ million. That was a conservative target, and we remain entirely confident in achieving it. However. As we have moved deeper into the integration process. We worked with the merger integration expert, we have now retained a top three consulting firm. One consensus has emerged: we can do more. Therefore, I'm increasing our commitment. I am personally committing today that we will deliver more than $300 million in net cost synergies, representing 11% of combined annualized Non-GAAP OPEX. $150 million will be realized in the first year post-close. The more than $300 million in net cost synergies includes the same synergy assumption that we previously had. This is a CEO commitment backed by the same discipline and focus that allowed us to reset our cost structure without compromising our core growth engine. My commitment is firm. More than $300 million in net cost synergies, including the same synergy assumption that we previously had. We will hold ourselves accountable to this new benchmark, and we will update you on our progress every quarter post-close. Now, let me provide an update on the major AI initiative that's underway at Compass. Our vision around AI is clear. AI will transform our business by, one, redefining agent productivity, two, driving greater efficiency across the organization, and three, enhancing the relationship our agents have with their clients. At Compass, we call it AI for AI, artificial intelligence to empower agent intelligence. As we shared last quarter, we began testing Compass AI 2.0 with our real estate professionals. In Q3, we completed an alpha that included hundreds of real estate professionals who tested Compass AI on both mobile and desktop. Our real estate professionals are finding tremendous value in simply using their voice to ask the Compass platform to perform tasks such as creating client collections, creating client one dashboards, creating business tracker folders, or adding and tagging a CRM contact. What I've been particularly pleased to see is that some of our agents have already been testing it live with their clients during listing appointments, which is helping elevate them in the eyes of their clients. This is the power of agentic AI in action, which breaks down complex manual processes into actionable steps that the AI can handle autonomously. This ability to automate administrative work will ultimately allow our real estate professionals to focus on what matters most, which is serving their clients. What has become increasingly clear to us as we've continued to test Compass AI 2.0 is that Compass is well positioned to harness agentic AI in the brokerage vertical. This advantage stems from having invested nearly $2 billion to date in our proprietary end-to-end agent productivity platform, compared to our competitors that almost all rely on multiple third-party software platforms that do not allow them to connect the various parts of an agent's workflow. In contrast to our competitors, our deeply integrated platform feeds our AI, giving it a unique contextual understanding. We believe Compass AI 2.0 has the ability to supercharge the adoption of the Compass platform and unlock a new wave of productivity for our agents. We expect to launch Compass AI 2.0 to all agents before the next earnings call and look forward to updating you on the impact. In addition to these efforts, I'm now hearing a significant shift in increased revenue coming from ChatGPT and similar generative AI chatbots. Specifically, I've had dozens of top real estate professionals tell me they're getting free business from today's conversational AI platforms as home buyers are now asking models like ChatGPT for the best agents in their market. Here's the critical distinction. Unlike real estate portals that divert buyers to the highest-paying agents, AI models like ChatGPT are sending buyers to agents that have verifiable real-world data, things like transaction history, unique listings, and client reviews. This is a major tailwind for Compass because we are home to so many of the industry's highest-performing real estate professionals that have a lot of this verifiable real-world data. Ultimately, we believe that as search in the residential real estate category evolves towards AI-based search, it will unlock a whole new era for agents at Compass. This new era will be defined by real estate transaction experience, results, and reputation that is validated and verified. It will raise the bar and ensure that performance is directly rewarded with leads from these AI models, which will enhance the revenue of top brokerages and top agents like ours. While we are optimistic that AI will elevate our agents even further, artificial intelligence is not emotional intelligence. I believe nothing can replace the ability our agents have to make meaningful connections, build relationships, and get clients to trust them. In this new era of AI, artificial intelligence. EQ, emotional intelligence wins. Finally, we are using AI to drive cost containment from an OPEX perspective. We have launched a mandatory employee AI learning initiative across our organization, including but not limited to engineering, transaction operations, legal, and finance. The goal is to find better ways to work and become more efficient by leveraging AI to support routine tasks today and more complex tasks in the future. By embedding AI across all our workflows, we believe we can deliver, one, a lower cost to serve per transaction. Two, limit the increase in our OPEX going forward, and three, deliver an even better experience for our real estate professionals. With that, I will now hand it over to Scott. Thanks, Robert. As Robert stated earlier, our results this quarter were the strongest results for a third quarter in Compass's history. Set a series of new records both financially and operationally. Our third quarter revenue was $1.85 billion, an increase of 23.6% from the year-ago period, and an all-time Q3 record for Compass. While M&A contributed to the year-over-year growth in revenue, even excluding M&A, revenue increased 11% on an organic basis. Transactions for the quarter increased 21.5%, or 6.6% on an organic basis, which compares favorably to the overall market where transactions increased by 2%. This outperformance to the industry is also reflected in our market share, which was 5.6% in the quarter, an increase of 83 basis points from the year-ago period. As a reminder, due to seasonality, our quarterly market share in each third quarter is lower than the sequentially prior second quarter. This is driven by our West Coast markets that are typically a greater contributor to our total revenue mix in each Q2 period compared to Q3. Gross transaction value was $70.7 billion in the third quarter, an increase of 22.5% from a year ago, reflecting a 21.5% increase in total transactions combined with an increase in average selling price of about 1%. The increase in our average selling price was closer to 5% on an organic basis. However, our acquisitions over the past year primarily operate in markets with lower average selling prices compared to our organic average selling price, which brings down the overall average. Our commissions and other related expenses as a percentage of revenue was 81.44% for the quarter, an improvement of 73 basis points compared to Q3 of last year at 82.17%. Primarily driven by the impact of our January acquisition of Christie's International Real Estate, which has more favorable margins. Excluding M&A, our commissions and other related expenses as a percentage of revenue were down 20 basis points for the quarter versus the prior year quarter. Consistent with what we've seen all year, our highest-producing agents, who generally carry higher splits, continue to take more of the market share gains, which contributes to the decline in this metric. As we said previously, we're okay with this trade-off today as these agents are driving higher gross commission income, and therefore we retain a higher aggregate dollar value of revenue after commissions, albeit at a slightly lower effective rate. Our total Non-GAAP operating expenses were $252 million in Q3, an increase from $215 million of OPEX in the year-ago period, which was largely driven by M&A, including the OPEX we assumed from the January 2025 acquisition of Christie's International Real Estate, the Washington Fine Properties acquisition in February 2025, and a number of other smaller brokerage and title companies we acquired this year. Excluding the impact of M&A, our Non-GAAP OPEX over the prior year is higher by about 3.5%, reflecting our strong discipline on minimizing growth in organic OPEX. During the third quarter, we incurred $7.5 million of transaction expenses related to the announced merger with Anywhere, primarily legal fees and investment banking fees. We expect to continue to incur these types of expenses through the closing of the transaction, and we also expect to incur integration costs in future periods as we've kicked off the planning process for bringing these two companies together. Given this dynamic, we've opened a new line item on our statement of operations this quarter titled Anywhere Merger Transaction and Integration Expenses to capture the $7.5 million incurred this quarter, and we've also excluded these costs from our Non-GAAP operating expenses and excluded them from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA. We'll continue to present these types of costs on this new line item in future periods. Adjusted EBITDA was $93.6 million, a strong improvement of 80% from Adjusted EBITDA of $52 million a year ago, and this also represents a record level of Adjusted EBITDA for any third-quarter period and the second-strongest level of Adjusted EBITDA for any quarter. Adjusted EBITDA benefited from the higher revenue and the continued strong discipline on operating expenses, but this quarter, Adjusted EBITDA also benefited from the most profitable quarter we've ever had for our mortgage joint venture, which is now combined with the mortgage JV we acquired through the Christie's International Real Estate acquisition earlier this year. As a reminder, the mortgage JV results are included in the line item of our P&L titled equity in income of unconsolidated entities, which was a + $3 million this quarter. Stock-based compensation expense in the quarter was $60 million and in line with our guidance. As a reminder, during our Q1 results call earlier this year, we explained that our stock-based compensation levels would be elevated during the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2025 due to a change in our methodology for granting employee equity and the accounting rules related to that change. As a result, you should expect a similar level of SBC in the fourth quarter, followed by reductions in 2026 as the RSUs with the higher accounting values begin to vest out. GAAP net loss was $4.6 million in Q3 compared to GAAP net loss of $1.7 million a year ago. However, excluding the $7.5 million in deal-related expenses from the Anywhere transaction, net income would have been a + $2.9 million. As for cash, we generated $73.6 million in free cash flow in the third quarter, which was not only an improvement over the $32.8 million of free cash flow from Q3 2024, but also a new record level of quarterly free cash flow for any third-quarter period. As a reminder, our Q2 2025 free cash flow would have been higher than Q3 had it not been for the second and final installment of the class action settlement we paid in Q2 for $29 million. Also, as a reminder, due to the seasonality of our business, our Q2 and Q3 free cash flow levels are the highest, and you should expect lower levels of free cash flow over the next two quarters due to the seasonality. As a result of the strong cash flow in the third quarter, we paid down the $50 million balance on the revolver, which we previously drew to fulfill the cash portion of the purchase price for Christie's International Real Estate. We ended the third quarter with no outstanding balance on our revolver and $170 million of cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet. Our basic weighted average share count for the third quarter was 566 million, which was in line with our prior guidance. Turning now to financial guidance for Q4. For Q4 of 2025, we expect revenue in the range of $1.59 billion-$1.69 billion and expect Adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $35 million-$49 million. We expect our weighted average share count for the third quarter to be between 571 million-574 million shares. As you can see from our Q3 results, we remain very focused on OPEX discipline. Last quarter, we reduced our full-year OPEX guidance from the prior levels of $1.017 billion-$1.042 billion down to $1.01 billion-$1.02 billion, or a reduction of $14.5 million off the midpoints. However, we continue to pace favorably to this revised OPEX level, and therefore we're further reducing our OPEX range for the full year 2025 to $1 billion-$1.005 billion. This updated full-year estimate includes the assumption of about $7 million of assumed in-year OPEX from four smaller acquisitions we completed during the third quarter. After considering the assumed OPEX from Q3 M&A, this reduction in our full-year OPEX estimate is an additional $19.5 million off the midpoints, or an aggregate reduction of $34 million. The continued favorability reflected in our OPEX guide is in part due to the actions we announced last quarter with the goal of improving our profitability incrementally by $50 million-$75 million. When we announced this initiative last quarter, we stated we expected to achieve at least $50 million of this profitability enhancement to our Adjusted EBITDA by 2026, and I'm pleased to say that we continue to expect to achieve this goal based on our progress to date. I would now like to turn the call over to the operator to begin Q&A. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand now. If you have dialed into today's call, please press star nine to raise your hand and star six to unmute. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Ryan McKeveny with Zelman and Associates. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hey, thank you. Good morning and great job on the quarter. Scott, just on that last point on the incremental $50 million-$75 million EBITDA, I think it sounded as though some of that may have flowed through this quarter, maybe also in the four-Q guide. Is that the case? As we think about the incremental of that into 2026, is the 50 kind of inclusive of what we've already been achieving, or could there be an incremental 50 on top in 2026? Thank you. Yeah, hey, Ryan, good to talk to you. Thanks for the question. Yeah, and it's included in the $50 million-$75 million guide we talked about. When we brought that up last quarter, we talked about the fact that some of it was already being considered in the reduction that we put out last quarter. Then with the reduction this quarter, it's incremental to that. The idea is that those reductions in OPEX will continue into the baseline for 2026. So that's really kind of that initial what we put out as a $50 million-$75 million kind of EBITDA profitability improvement on really what were 2026 expectations as of the quarter ago. Got it. Okay, that makes sense. Then, Robert, you mentioned on the Christie's business, I think you said there's been a thousand basis point uplift in attach. My understanding is they had pretty strong ancillaries to begin with. So can you drill into that a little bit? Is that just agents allocating more business to that, or did you guys possibly incorporate OneClick Title into their markets? Anything to unpack that uplift a little would be helpful. Thank you so much. Absolutely. It comes from bringing the Christie's agents into the fold. Before they were that title business was only working with their own agents and selectively with ours. But when we bring our agents into the fold and let them know that the Christie's Washington Fine Properties title business is part of the family and giving them access to the offices integration into our technology, helping them understand that when the title business succeeds, we all succeed. That buy-in and the time saved by bringing it into the same house is what drives it. So we are excited to see how bringing other title businesses from Anywhere into markets where we already operate, how that can drive attach as well. Got it. Thank you very much. Your next question comes from the line of Bernie McTernan with Needham & Company. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe to start, Robert, I thought the commentary on everything that's going on in generative AI and generative AI was interesting. Do you have an actual integration with ChatGPT currently, or is this all organic traffic? If not, are those conversations going on for you to potentially partner and deepen that integration? We have an integration with OpenAI through our Compass AI 1.0, moving to Compass AI 2.0. That's the generative AI that our agents are using that's in alpha that will be in full with all of our agents by the next earnings call. In terms of the ChatGPT lead flow, that's just coming organically from the world. Really, it's just such a wonderful thing. You just call any top agent you know and say, "Have you gotten leads, received leads from ChatGPT?" They're going to say yes. Then ask the same question from someone who has no transaction experience, and they're going to say no. What's great for us is we're a company of highly experienced real estate professionals with a lot of transaction experience. It really does mark a different era. The technology was being used by companies to force agents to pay for leads that didn't have experience. Now technology is being used to guide agents organically to the best agents. Let me share it this way. What some portals do, not to mention any name, what some portals do is they've taken the goodwill of Google, and they've made the consumer think that similar to how Google just guides you to the right answer, guides you to exactly what you're looking for. When it's not guiding you there, it says "Sponsored ad." It's taken the goodwill of Google, and then it has made the buyer think that they're always being guided to the best agent or the listing agent. It's not saying when it's a paid agent. It's not saying like Google that's a sponsored paid agent. So what's great about ChatGPT is it's bringing the lead flow back to the truth, similar to the way Google did, to the organic path to the best, most experienced agent. That's a great thing for highly experienced real estate professionals and is a great thing for companies like Compass. Yep, makes a lot of sense. You mentioned the increased synergy target for the annual transaction going from at least $225 to at least $300. Any particular area you can say those costs are coming from, or is it just more widespread? Thank you. As Soham mentioned earlier in the call, we aren't commenting beyond the updates provided earlier, but I would like to just reiterate my overall excitement for the transaction for all the reasons that we laid out on the call today, but also their last call that we had. Got it. Thanks, Robert. Your next question comes from the line of Chris Kuntarich with UBS. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks for taking the question. Robert, if I could just ask on the increasing number of agents you're going to be adding, I think you're talking 700 - 800 now. That was previously 600 - 700. Could you just talk about what's giving you the confidence, what you're kind of seeing there to increase that expectation? What's giving us the confidence is just the pipeline and flow of interested real estate agents and walkovers. Like I mentioned on the call, we have more momentum at this point in the quarter than we did in the same point in the quarter in last quarter. We see, I think what the average real estate professional sees that things are changing. They're looking for a company that is going to be proactive as the world changes and not reactive, and a company that has the resources to build the right future for their profession. We've invested nearly $2 billion in our technology platform. We've advocated for listing agents and their clients for home seller choice in an environment where they are being fined up to $5,000 by MLSs controlled by NAR whenever they don't give a listing to the MLS. Now, of course, they're being banned by certain portals if they don't give their listing to the portal. So it's such a It's an environment where I don't think the average real estate professional feels like they are being supported. I don't think the average real estate professional feels like they're being supported by NAR. I don't think the average real estate professional feels like they're being supported by their MLS. I don't think the average real estate professional feels like they're being supported by certain leading portals. The only reason Compass exists is to support the real estate agent. If we can't help real estate agents create more success, we have no reason to exist. We have now a track record of 13 years of investing in their profession. So yeah, I think any investor or analyst that does market checks on how people are feeling about this moment and the potential of these two companies coming together, I think you'll be continuously pleasantly surprised. Super helpful. Just one quick follow-up on the 30% market share in your top 30 markets. Could you just give us a quick update on how that strategy is progressing? Thanks. Yeah. At this time, we're not talking about that topic, but definitely appreciate the question. Thanks. Your next question comes from the line of Jason Helfstein with Oppenheimer & Co. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. I apologize if this was addressed just a bunch of companies this morning. So two questions, though. What drove the two-point acceleration in organic growth, and what's implied in 4Q? I mean, it sounds like it's simply just adding more agents, but if there's just other ways you want to unpack that. Two. Robert, just any more color, what's the current adoption of three-phase marketing and any thoughts you have around kind of adoption levels, given that we saw momentum, it slowed, has it picked back up? Thanks. Hey, Jason, it's Scott. I'll go into the organic growth. I mean, really, the Q3 was really a story of September. We started out the quarter with a decent July and August, but it really kind of hit a nice stride in September. That's what led to the beat really on the organic side. We don't break out the organic versus M&A growth for our future guidance. So we don't have that for Q4. But you can see you can kind of back into that based on what we've done through the first three quarters. The Christie's International Real Estate acquisition back in January is the primary driver for the inorganic growth all year, and it will be the same way in the fourth quarter. On three-phase marketing. Just given where things are. We're not diving into that topic. But I can share with you that I can share with you that clients continue to want more choices, not less choices. I don't know a seller who wants less choices of how to mark them. I don't know a seller who said, "I only want my listing to go through one funnel." I don't know a seller who says, "I don't want to have an option to not have days on market and price drop history on my listing." I don't know a seller who says, "I don't want an option to test price privately before being on the open market where you have the risk of price drops." I don't know an agent who went into a listing presentation, came back, and said, "You know what? Because I offered the Compass three-phase marketing strategy, phase I, private exclusive, phase II, coming soon, testing price privately with a large network of top agents in the country." And then going to the open market. No agents told me in the last quarter that that reduced their chances of getting the listing. I've only heard that it's increased their chances. Again, sellers want more choices, not less choices. Okay. That's just loud and clear. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Alec Brondolo with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks so much for the question. I appreciate it. Maybe on Christie's, could you describe the propensity of the affiliates or the franchisees to work with you on operational improvements? Is it harder to bring operational improvements to bear in that business model relative to kind of the O&O model that the business is more accustomed to? Thank you. We have really focused on the O&O. But given the pending transaction, we are focusing much more on the franchise business. We are ensuring that the platform will be able to work for the entire franchise business day one. And that we will be able to get the appropriate efficiencies. Not just for the company, the franchisor, but also for the real estate professional, giving them a platform that will allow them to move to save time and to better serve their clients. So yeah. So it's a key focus given the moment that we're in. Got it. Thanks. Maybe if I could just follow up on the question around ChatGPT and kind of agents in that modality. The ChatGPT having a greater propensity to kind of serve the customer to the agent as opposed to serving the customer to the portal. How do you think about syndicating more data into kind of the ChatGPT environment? A lot of data in this industry is behind a paywall. It's behind the MLS. It's inside a brokerage internal system. How do you think about over time, perhaps giving ChatGPT more access to Compass data and more access to Compass listings to perhaps accelerate the trend that you're describing? Anything we do will be consistent with what sellers and their listing agents want, right? I think it's not the MLS's data, although as a. Monopoly, they force you to the listing agent to give it to them out of fear of $5,000 fines, and then they sell it to well over 100 different entities. So I think just given that what Compass stands for is choice over platform control, anything we do will be consistent with what sellers and their listing agents want. I do think the home is personal property. I think people have property rights. I think the theme of privacy, data privacy, personal privacy, I think that theme is becoming more valuable every year that goes by, not less. So if we can the greater value than selling data to ChatGPT. I think is in getting more listings by serving the client's needs. Again, that said, if the listing agent and their client would like any certain platform to have their listing for more exposure, as you know Homes.com is boosting every listing that's banned in support of the listing agent and the seller in support of choice. I think there will be opportunities like the one you're mentioning, but it just has to come from the listing agent and their seller. Last thing on ChatGPT, it's not just that the top agents are getting more referrals, but they're getting them for free. You could spend 40% of your commission getting it from one. An inexperienced agent can spend 40% of their commission to give it to a portal, or an experienced agent can get no referral fee and just get a free referral from ChatGPT. It really is a paradigm shift. I'm happy for all the experienced agents that are benefiting in this moment. Thank you so much. Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Bouley with Barclays. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for taking the questions. I wanted to ask on Christie's. Sticking with that topic, so really helpful color around everything you've done since the deal, kind of growing agents and the synergies you've achieved and so forth. I wanted to ask on kind of the learnings on running a franchise business over the past nine months. How do you think about what you can sort of leverage between your own brokerage and the franchises across perhaps leads or otherwise? Would refranchising ever be a consideration? Thank you. Yeah. What we've learned is the platform can scale to franchises and provide tremendous benefits to franchises just like owned and operated. I mean, from a real estate agent perspective, it's the same thing. You just have to make it multi-tenant, multi-brand. That's exciting. We're in the middle of that work now. What we've learned is that we can give the same advantages that Compass created for ourselves to the franchise business. Think of what are the things that we have had outside success with at Compass that we would want to bring to others. For example, our enterprise sales engine, right, with our recruiting engine for Compass, we can give the same strategic growth manager sales process and give it to our franchise. We're in the process of testing that with our current franchise affiliates, but we're going to give it more broadly afterwards. All the things with transaction management, we have the ability to provide a lower cost to serve to process transactions, which is a combination of our technology processes and our people. As well as we've really leaned into offshore and outsourcing. Bringing those same learnings to the franchise owners and really everything that we've had to do on whether the growth or on the cost side for ourselves in the context of these last four years with the market turning, giving those same advantages to our franchise owners. I'm really, really excited. I mean, I love real estate professionals, but at the core of what I love are entrepreneurs. These franchise owners are entrepreneurs at the highest level. I'm excited to help them grow and to have them as my client. Got it. No, that's really helpful color. Thank you for that, Robert. Secondly, I wanted to ask on maybe smaller M&A and growth investment into new markets. Obviously, I heard you loud and clear kind of put the 30/30 aside. Are there additional markets around the country on your wish list where you would look to build scale? If we're thinking out over the next several years, kind of where would you focus that next leg of growth investment? Thank you. Given the pending merger, we're going to hit a pause on incremental tuck-in M&A as we shift our focus on executing the integration flawlessly. The main thing is keeping the main thing the main thing. That is a flawless integration, day-one execution for the majority of execution tasks and the platform for everybody and while driving free cash flow in the interim period and, of course, afterwards for the obvious reason. The good news is that our walk-over motion has been working incredibly well. As a reminder, these are typically the agent teams that could range from 50 + or even as small as 20- 30. But there's a lot of. If you're the average small brokerage or boutique that's 20 - 100, we're more interesting to them today than we were two years ago. You have not just the platform but you also have the brands as well, which is great. Yeah. Just to add one comment to Robert's point there, we talked about four acquisitions, three small brokerages, and one title company that we acquired in the third quarter. That was all kind of pre-the Anywhere transaction announcement. We've effectively hit the pause button now. Got it. Well, thanks, guys. Good luck. Thank you. Your final question comes from the line of Michael Ng with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you for the question. I just wanted to ask about OPEX management. Compass has obviously delivered a lot of good efficiencies in sales and marketing, ops and support. Is that kind of the key area of operational efficiencies that you see going forward? And then as a follow-up. Within the Non-GAAP SG&A, were there any kind of meaningful legal expenses that are in there? I can appreciate the Anywhere transaction costs are excluded, but I was just wondering if there are any kind of legal costs related to pending lawsuits and litigation. Thank you. Yeah. Quickly on the last question first. Yeah, there's some legal expenses that are being incurred for the various litigation matters we have outstanding in the third quarter. And we have that in our OPEX guide for the fourth quarter. But to clarify, the stuff related to Anywhere specifically has been broken out on that separate line. On the where we see the OPEX reductions, as we've talked about in the past, the whole company is really aligned on a fiscally responsible management approach here. And as we said before, it's really embedded into the DNA of our employees at this point. I'll give you a couple of examples, but it kind of goes around the board. When we have a resignation in somebody's group, we challenge if the role needs to be backfilled. And if it does need to be backfilled, we challenge ourselves if it can be staffed in an offshore lower-cost labor market. We've got an internal team that focuses on applying Six Sigma methodologies to some of the key process areas with a goal of creating efficiencies and lowering costs. Robert talked about the AI initiative we've launched across the company that's being led by one of our senior vice presidents where all of our departments are being challenged on how they can use AI to improve productivity. Just in my own area of finance, we've been using an outside consulting firm to augment some of the support on our accounts payable processing for years now. But due to efficiency gains and some offshore staffing, we're going to be fully wound down on that consulting firm by the end of this year that's going to bring a lower cost to that service. So it's really kind of just across the board we're seeing this. And then, of course, we're making good progress on integrating the acquired businesses. And when we do that, we have opportunities to also consolidate and reduce some of those same categories. So the way we're really thinking about it is we're going to continue to invest in the platform, invest in our agents, but we're being really disciplined on OPEX because when we close the Anywhere transaction, we're going to pick up a lot of debt. We realize that. So any dollar we save now is really kind of being put into the cash accounts, and that'll be used to accelerate the debt paydown when we close that deal. Great. Thank you, Scott. If I could just have a quick follow-up on those legal costs that are embedded in the fourth quarter guidance, are you expecting them to come off in 2026, or do you think these things will be ongoing? Thank you. Yeah. I think there's some that will be ongoing. A little bit. Fully tough to tell now. It kind of depends on how some of the actions occur in the fourth quarter. For now, I would expect some of them will continue into 2026. We'll obviously provide an update on that when we get closer to our next quarter, when we put out some expectations for 2026 guidance. Great. Thank you very much. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Robert for closing remarks. Thank you, everyone, for joining our call today. I want to end by thanking all of our employees, all of our agents for their incredible hard work. Together, we delivered our best third quarter ever. I look forward to building upon this momentum in 2026 together with the Anywhere team. Thank you, and have a great rest of your day. This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.